• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Medium-term macroeconomic projections in a multiregional state: the case of Belgium

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Share "Medium-term macroeconomic projections in a multiregional state: the case of Belgium"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texto

(1)

plan.be

Medium-term macroeconomic projections in a multiregional state: the case of Belgium

Delphine Bassilière (FPB) – Didier Baudewyns (FPB)

Brussels, 1stFebruary 2013 CMTEA Workshop

Long tradition of making medium-term forecasts at the Belgian Federal Planning Bureau…

… first at national level…

… since a few years also at regional level

Aim of this presentation: explaining how national and regional medium-term forecasts are generated

Overview:

1. National medium-term forecasts: the HERMES model 2. Regional medium-term forecasts: the HERMREG model

Medium-term forecasting at the Belgian Federal

Planning Bureau

(2)

plan.be

Harmonized Econometric Research for Modelling Economic Systems

Analysis of macroeconomic and sectoral aspects of the Belgian economy

Yearly sectoral model with a forecasting period of 1 to 6-12 years

Econometric model based on time series analysis with strong theoretical foundations

Demand-driven model + important supply elements

FPB’s national medium-term model: HERMES

General Description

8000 equations of which 600 are econometrically estimated

1200 exogenous variables

15 industries

4 production factors

3 main categories of salaried employment (and 2 sub- categories)

8 main energy products (total of 14)

6 greenhouse gases

15 main consumption categories (total of 24)

5 main institutional sectors (total of 12)

Highly detailed public finances block

FPB’s national medium-term model: HERMES

Which disaggregation?

(3)

plan.be

Starting point: international environment and demography

For years t and t+1, fully coherent with the short-term MODTRIM model’s results

From industries to national results

Putty-clay production functions for manufacturing

Exogenous technical progress

Use of input-output and transition matrices to determine consumption and sectoral investments

Potential output and output gap are computed ex post using the EC methodology (but applied to our own historical and projected series)

Working Paper “A new version of the HERMES model” to be published in the coming months

FPB’s national medium-term model: HERMES

Some characteristics

FPB’s national medium-term model: HERMES

Different blocks

(4)

plan.be

FPB’s national medium-term model: HERMES

An illustration: Real and potential GDP growth

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016

Real GDP growth Potential GDP growth

Main uses:

Medium-term outlook (unchanged policy scenario, notably with regard to fiscal and social policies)

Impact of policy measures and exogeneous shocks (impact of higher crude oil prices, effects of various energy taxation policies, effects of new labour policies,…)

Main users:

Social Partners

Federal Government

Parliament, universities, research departments, …

FPB’s national medium-term model: HERMES

Main uses and users

(5)

plan.be

In February: National short-term exercise (year t) for budgetary control produced by MODTRIM (FPB’s national short-term model)

In March: Fully coherent with national short-term forecast, preliminary version of national medium-term exercise, used by the government to draw up SP and NRP, submitted to EC

In May: Final version of national medium-term assessment for Belgian economy

Calendar of FPB’s national and regional forecasts

In June: Fully coherent with national medium-term outlook, regional medium-term outlook published with our regional partners

In June: Fully coherent with national medium-term outlook, national long term outlook published by the Study

Committee on Ageing (MALTESE model)

In September: National short-term exercise (year t and t+1) for the budget of year t+1

In September: Fully coherent with new national short-term exercise, quick update of national and regional medium- term outlook

Calendar of FPB’s national and regional forecasts

(6)

plan.be

Cooperation (since end 2005) between the three regional research institutes (IBSA, SVR, IWEPS) and FPB

Why HERMREG ?

Growing importance of Regions for policy making

Since 1970: six State reforms in Belgium

Sixth State reform under way: devolution of even more responsibilities to the Regions

Regional policy instruments (EU, national, regional levels)

Need for developing tools for policy analysis including a regional dimension

1ststep: development of a first top-down macroeconometric multiregional module (“HERMREG”) coupled to HERMES

Main goal: medium-term forecasting

Top-down (why ?) : severe data restrictions at regional level

Multiregional forecasting: the HERMREG project

3 regions, 13 industries

Time-series macroeconometrics (1980-…)

Public finances by Region and by Community: in HERMES

Credibility of the regional projections:

Consistency with the national FPB outlook/projections

Collective publications/communication (common press releases)

Close collaboration of experts of FPB and the 3 regions

Transparency: publication of regional projections + database 1995–… available on the FPB website

Use of HERMREG database/projections by national/regional experts, usual “outsiders” (academics, …)

Multiregional forecasting: the HERMREG project

(7)

plan.be

Top-down HERMREG model

Regional household income accounts Multiregional shift-

share block Employment, GVA, investments, labour cost: 13 branches

Inter- regional commuting

flows

Employed labour force, unemployment National medium-term projections

5 agents, 15 industries, 24 consumption goods/services, 4 production factors, 6 GHG

Population, regional labour supply

Regional GHG

emissions +

HERMES

HERMREG Regional

Public Finances

Combination of shift-share and regression analysis (similar to REGINA: Koops and Muskens, 2005)

Multiregional shift-share block: 4 key variables

GVA, investments, wages, employment

Decomposition of growth rate yij,t(sector i, region j, year t) in two components (in volumes for GVA and investments):

1) national sectoral growth rate yi.,t 2) differential shift: rij,t(= yij,t - yi.,t)

so yij,t= yi.,t+ rij,t

rij,t is endogenously determined for the 4 key variables, using

OLS-estimated equations

empirical selection of explanatory variables: general-to- specific strategy

Top-down HERMREG model

(8)

plan.be

Coherence with national projections:

Regional projections are used as

“endogenous keys”

Any regional series in current prices: weights applied to the national forecast

Any regional series in “chained Euros”: calibration to the national projected value (aggregates in PYP are additive)

3 regions 6 commuting flows are modelled …

… using push-pull factors: economic conditions in origin and/or destination region (e.g. employment growth, unemployment rate)

Regional unemployment = labour supply – working population working population = employment + (outgoing commuting – incoming commuting) + net-border workers flow

Public accounts of the Communities and Regions

Top-down regional energy-environment (GHG) module

Top-down HERMREG model

k T ij k T i k T

ij y r

yˆ , ., ˆ,

Multiregional multisectoral medium-term projections:

GVA

Investments

Wages

Employment (salaried and self-employed)

Labour productivity

Multiregional medium-term projections:

GDP

Commuting flows, working population, employment rate, unemployment

GHG emissions (CO2, …)

Households incomes

Multiregional projections

(9)

plan.be

Multiregional projections

Regional GDP in volume

growth rate in %

Regional GDP growth differentials

compared to Flanders, in pp : 5-year moving average

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Brussels-Capital Region Flemish Region Walloon Region -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

Flemish Region - Brussels-Capital Region Flemish Region - Walloon Region

Progressive development of a bottom-up multiregional macroeconometric structural model

Top-down: OK for prevision, not for regional impact analysis

Different regionsare influenced differently by national policies

Need to model both the supply and the demand sides by region

1ststep: a hybrid bottom-up/top down model

Supply side regionalised

Two-level CES four-factor production functions

Demand side: still overwhelmingly national (demand for regional production: top-down determined)

Next steps: regionalisation of demand components

Deliveries by regional branch to investments of all the branches

Work in progress: the bottom-up approach

(10)

plan.be

Regions are different: example

Regional unemployment rate

% of labour force (broad definition)

Regional employment rate

% of working age population(15-64 years)

50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0

1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

Brussels-Capital Region Flemish Region Walloon Region 0.0

5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

Brussels-Capital Region Flemish Region Walloon Region

For listening For questions (?)

Thank you !

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Respirators e.g., N95 provide 50 times more protection than homemade masks, but these can contribute by reducing population exposures to respiratory infections in the short term.18 The