• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel - GEF/STAP

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Share "Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel - GEF/STAP"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texto

(1)

1

Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel

The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel, administered by UNEP, advises the Global Environment Facility

STAP Scientific and Technical screening of the Project Identification Form (PIF)

Date of screening: 25th January 2010 Screener: Lev Neretin Panel member validation by: N.H. Ravindranath

I. PIF Information

GEFPROJECT ID:3923 COUNTRY(IES):CAPE VERDE

PROJECT TITLE: PROMOTING MARKET BASED DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL TO MEDIUM SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS IN CAPE VERDE

GEFAGENCY(IES):UNIDO

OTHER EXECUTING PARTNER(S): MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND ENERGY,ELECTRA,ECOWASCENTER FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY

GEFFOCAL AREA (S):CLIMATE CHANGE GEF-4STRATEGIC PROGRAM(S): CC-SP3

NAMEOFPARENT/UMBRELLAPROJECT: A NATIONAL LEVEL PROJECT IN CAPE VERDE UNDER THE GEF PROGRAMMATIC APPROACH ON ACCESS TO ENERGY IN WEST AFRICA

II. STAP Advisory Response (see table below for explanation)

1. Based on this PIF screening, STAP’s advisory response to the GEF Secretariat and GEF Agency(ies):

Consent

III. Further guidance from STAP

1. The project submitted by UNIDO aims to establish market conditions for small to medium scale renewable energy systems. The project’s framework is comprehensive and addresses key barriers for market transformation such as information and technical, institutional, legal and regulatory as well as economic and market barriers. Project interventions are expected to be built based on the baseline assessment conducted at the preparatory phase. STAP recommends considering the following issues before the CEO endorsement.

2. Scale-up and replication: Scale-up and replication are important issues to consider for the project of this scale to assure that enabling environment and lessons learned are distributed at the national level. STAP recommends that institutional capacity building and awareness raising activities target strategically important stakeholders from relevant sectors (energy generation, building and construction, waste management and etc) and at different levels (islands vs. national level).

3. Climate risks: Investments in small to medium scale renewable energy (wind, solar and small hydro) are susceptible to climate risks. Climate-proofing of proposed technologies/measures is required as a part of the technical feasibility/commercial viability analysis.

STAP advisory response

Brief explanation of advisory response and action proposed

1. Consent STAP acknowledges that on scientific/technical grounds the concept has merit. However, STAP may state its views on the concept emphasising any issues that could be improved and the proponent is invited to approach STAP for advice at any time during the development of the project brief prior to submission for CEO endorsement.

2. Minor revision required.

STAP has identified specific scientific/technical suggestions or opportunities that should be discussed with the proponent as early as possible during development of the project brief. One or more options that remain open to STAP include:

(i) Opening a dialogue between STAP and the proponent to clarify issues

(ii) Setting a review point during early stage project development and agreeing terms of reference for an independent expert to be appointed to conduct this review

The proponent should provide a report of the action agreed and taken, at the time of submission of the full project brief for CEO endorsement.

3. Major revision required

STAP proposes significant improvements or has concerns on the grounds of specified major scientific/technical omissions in the concept. If STAP provides this advisory response, a full explanation would also be provided. Normally, a STAP approved

(2)

2 review will be mandatory prior to submission of the project brief for CEO endorsement.

The proponent should provide a report of the action agreed and taken, at the time of submission of the full project brief for CEO endorsement.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The proponent is strongly encouraged to: i Open a dialogue with STAP regarding the technical and/or scientific issues raised; ii Set a review point at an early stage during project

PIF Information Copied from the PIF FULL SIZE PROJECT GEFTRUST FUND GEFPROJECT ID: 4841 PROJECT DURATION : 4 COUNTRIES : Uruguay PROJECT TITLE: Strengthening the Effectiveness of the

However, STAP may state its views on the concept emphasising any issues that could be improved and the proponent is invited to approach STAP for advice at any time during the

PIF Information Full size project GEF Trust Fund GEF PROJECT ID:3808 PROJECT DURATION:5 YEARS COUNTRIES: Brazil, Kenya, Turkey, Sri Lanka PROJECT TITLE: Mainstreaming

PIF Information : Promoting and Strengthening an Energy Efficiency Market in the Industry Sector in Chile Full size project GEF Trust Fund GEFSEC PROJECT ID1: 3599 GEF AGENCY

PIF Information Copied from the PIF FULL SIZE PROJECT MULTI TRUST FUNDS GEFPROJECT ID: 4512 PROJECT DURATION : 2.5 COUNTRIES : Regional PROJECT TITLE: Pilot Asia-Pacific Climate

At the CEO endorsement phase, STAP expects that project proponents provide specific details on how to assure and enforce sustainability of bamboo plantations and processing without

PIF Information Full size project GEF Trust Fund GEFSECPROJECT ID:3555 GEF AGENCY PROJECT ID:4043 COUNTRYIES:INDIA PROJECT TITLE:ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS IN COMMERCIAL