• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Parallel odor processing by two anatomically distinct olfactory bulb target structures.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Parallel odor processing by two anatomically distinct olfactory bulb target structures."

Copied!
10
0
0

Texto

Loading

Imagem

Figure 2. Spontaneous multi-unit activity in the OT and PCX.
Figure 4. Odor-evoked response probability in the OT and PCX. (A) 3-dimensional histogram of odor selectivity among OT (left) and PCX units (right) in response to the five odorants (male mouse urine, female mouse urine, fox urine, chow, IsoAA; see Material
Figure 6. Odor-evoked spike rate, but not response magnitudes are greater in OT than PCX
Figure 7. OT and PCX Odor signal:noise. (A) Average signal:noise (s:n, see Methods) in OT and PCX units

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The designation multivariate analysis represents a large number of methods and techniques that simultaneously use all variables in the analysis, interpretation and processing of

No presente artigo propomo-nos definir contributos para uma aproximação e estratégia nacional (Whole-of-Government Approach – WoGA) do Estado português na gestão de crises

This risk analysis included all activities that constituted the process, each type of failure that could affect the patient, its severity, the probability of each failure

The statistical analysis of the values at four weeks revealed that the remaining forces deliv- ered by the elastomeric chains were all different from each other; in the Long

The two absolute errors for each participant’s two responses (for Start A and Start B) were averaged to obtain the individual’s mean absolute error for each target in each

The implementation relies on static analysis, using a data flow analysis over a pro- grams call graph, that infers which locks need to be held for each unit of work, that

With the aim of evaluating the SRAP (sequence-related amplified polymorphism) technique for linkage mapping in Pisum sativum L., a F 2 mapping population.. derived from an

The surface roughness of each speci- men (n = 5) was based on the mean value of ive parallel measurements in each time and all data were submitted to two-way repeated measures