6. Chau P. K. Factors used in the selection of packaged software in small businesses: views of owners and managers. // Information and Management. – 1995. – № 29. – P. – 71 – 78.
7. Gamblin A. J., Software for accountants / A. J. Gamblin, J. G. Siegel // The National Public Accountant. – 1997. – № 6. – P. 12 – 17.
8. Grau G. DesCOTS: a software system for selection COTS components / G. Grau, J. P. Carvallo, X. Franch, C. Quer // EUROMICRO. – 2004. – № 4. – P. 118 – 126.
9. Ivanchevich S. H., Accounting software selection and satisfaction: a comparative analysis of vendor and user perception / S. H. Ivanchevich, D. M. Ivanchevich, F. Elikai // The Review of Business Information Systems. – 2007. – № 3 (Vol. 11). – P. 43 – 52.
10. Jadhav A. S. Evaluating and selection software packages: A review / A. S. Jadhav, R. M. Sonar // Information and software technology. – 2008. – № 51. – P. 555 – 563.
11. Kathuria P., M M. Selecting IT applications in manufacturing: a KBS approach / P. Kathuria, M. Anandarajan, M. ., Igbaria // Omega. – 1997. – № 27. P. 605 – 616.
12. Little I. Evaluating, selecting and implementing accounting software / I. Little // Credit control. – 2006. – № 3 (Vol. 27). – P. 36 –39.
13. Mattingly T. How to select accounting software / T. Mattingly // CPA Journal. – 2001. – № 11. – P. 48–53.
14. Mollaghasemi M. Briefing: Making Multiple Objective Decisions / M. Mollaghasemi, J. Pet-Edwards – Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1997. – 91 p.
15. Saaty T. L. The analytic hierarchy process: [ ].
– :
http://www.gobookee.net/analytic-hierarchy-process-saaty – .
16. Sahay B. S., Development of software selection criteria for supply chain solution / B. S. Sahay, A. K. Gupta // Industrial Management & Date Systems. – 2003. – № 2 (Vol. 103). – P. 97 – 110.
0 1 . 0 8 . 1 3
. , .
,
-.
.
К : , , KBS- ,
-.
I. Derun, postgraduate student
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv
EVALUATION OF NON-CURRENT ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE SELECTION
One of the important management decisions is selection of computer program that will ensure the effective functioning of accounting system in any company with minimal costs. Paper deals with evaluation of non-current accounting software selection and implementation. The purpose of the study is development of the methodical approach of software evaluation for accounting of non-current assets in Ukrainian industrial enterprises. The methodical criteria of evaluation of the software selection for accounting of non-current assets are suggested which based on the method of experts' evaluations. These criteria involve a number of quality characteristics which represented in the form of points to evaluate selection of the most effective computer program for accounting of non-current assets.
Keywords: non-current assets, software evaluation, KBSs, commercial-off-the-shelf software.
JEL I24, M19 658: 001.895
. , . . , .,
. , .
,
-. , ,
.
, .
.
К : , є , ,
-, , , , .
.
-, ,
-,
'є
-,
-,
,
, ,
.
-. є
[8, c. 271].
-, є
,
-,
-, .
– XXI
-, ,
-.
( ),
,
.
є
– є .
–
, , –
-є
-:
, ,
-,
.
-є
-,
.
.
-,
. . ,
. . , . , . . , . .
-, . . , . . , . . ,
. . , . . , . . , . .
-, . . , . , . . .
є ,
-. , . , . , .
-, . , . , . , .
-, . , . є , . , . ,
. , . , . .
-. , . , . ,
. , . , . , . , .
-, . . ,
-, є
-, є
-.
. є
-,
.
.
. є ,
-. , 1970 1990- .
:
28 . 69 . , 2002 .
122 . [19, . 92]. є
, є
-, є
-, є є
50%. є
2001-2010 .
27,6%,
– 72,9%,
– 49,6% [6; . 165].
є
100 . : 1990 .
(5 591 )
(5 102 ), '
-, 1 700 . 2011 .
5 850 .
[5; XV].
2025 .
150 . [19; . 92].
є
.
-є 'є 600 . . ,
,
[7; . 93].
є
.
є
є :
є ,
є є ,
.
-є ,
є
, є
-. є
-є " - ",
є –
-, є
-,
є.
-'
.
(1998), є
, '
.
є ,
-,
[19; . 101].
,
, ,
( ) – ,
"
-" [1]. є
-: (
-); (
) (
-
-) [2, . 261-265]. . ,
-є :
–
( , )
(
-, ,
-), , , ;
–
є ,
: " "
, ;
є " "
" " , є
-;
–
-,
-;
-є
[21].
-,
-, – є . "
-є " (entrepreneurial university)
1998 .
( ) . "
-є :
-".
– , '
-,
" є ": ;
-;
-;
;
,
є
–
є 140 . .
-,
( 50% )
-, , , , ,
-, , . ,
( 25%
50% ),
-, , , , .
( 10%
25% )
, є , , , , ,
, , , , .
є ,
( 10%
-) – , , , ,
, , , , ,
, , , , [19; . 92].
-'є ,
, є
: 1999 .
25-30 . . , 2007 . 100 . .
. 'є є
. є
, , ,
.
-є , , 2015 .
200 . . [4, . 5-6].
(tertiary education).
-, , .
, .
( , International Standard Classification of
Education – ISCED), 2011
, . 1.
1. 97, 2011 *
** 1997 є 2011
– 5 5 – 5
– 6 5 – 6
, – 7 5 – 7
– 8 – є
– 9 6 – 8
* : [1], [9], [15]
** – . 23.11.2011 №1341
" ь "; , ь
20.04.12 № 488 / 225 " ь ".
(GATS-). є
- ,
.
, , . . ,
-є :
1. (cross-border
supply of the service),
є ' ( ,
. .), , ,
-.
- (UCLA)
(the
Home Education Network) є 50
, 44
.
2. ( onsumption abroad),
є
–
.
(
, є
-), є
-,
є
.
,
( ),
0,8 . 1975 ., 3 . 2000 .,
2010 . 4,1 . .
. , 2010 .
177 .
77 . 2000 .,
-2,1 4,1 . [11, .362]. ,
-є ,
-є .
-: ,
-;
, /
-; , '
-, , ,
.
-,
. ,
є , Є
,
.
3.
( ommercial presence of the provider). –
, , ,
, є
-. є
-, ,
[18, . 17].
4.
-(the presence of persons in another country to provide the
service). є
.
,
[13]. є
.
( )
-є 2,8 .
[16, . 362], . 2.
-є , 2025 .
7,2 . [13].
:
2,8 .
100-120 . .,
50%
-- ,
-, , , ( . . 1).
-
, 2000 .
,
10,29 . .,
[19; . 93]. 2000- .
' –
,
14 . .,
є (13,3 . .) [17].
є 1/6
( . . 1),
(13%),
5 . . ., (6,6%),
(6,4%) .
-: 2,5 .
32,6 . Є , є 1%
-.
0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0
Ча
тка
ин
ку
,
%
Ча тка инку, 2010 Ча тка инку, 2000
. 1. *
( ) ; 2010 .
* : І [13]; [16]; [17].
2000 2010 . ,
, 23% 17%,
-, , 6%
( .1), ,
1 %,
,
-, 2%.
-,
-
-, є
.
2
-, є .
-Є
(
Є є 2/3
-).
, ,
-є є .
-є ,
(1,2 . ,
, 41%
-).
( є 0,2%).
є 120 . . – 11%
" ".
-є
2. , , 2008* ,
( ),
(%)
, ,
, ( )
-,
,
( )
: ( ) / є ** (%)
27 214
1%
(7 186), (6 436), (2 672), (1 716),
(1 372)
32 573
(6 700), (4 734),
(2 215), (1 809), (1 780),
(1 136), (1 038)
5 359
0,2%
43 982
0,5%
(9 795), (4 911),
(4 734), (3 347), (2 646)
60 288
(19 627), (8 405), (7 186), (5 566), (2 440)
17 411
0,2%
32 599
1,5%
(10 797), (8 572),
(3 260), (2 734),
(1 637)
13 021
(2 672), (1 780), (911), (397)
-19 868
-0,9%
2 965 840
1,9%
Є (62,1%
1,842 . ),
(18,9%),
Є (7,7%), (4,5%).
–
-(846 618),
Є
(486 981),
Є
(330 563)
-
* : [11]; [20].
** є ь – ь ь ь ( ),
ь , ь ь є , ь (
-), ь ь .
є
Є , , ,
-, є
-,
, є
-0,9%.
, є
, :
1) . є
. ,
є
( , , ,
) є
, , .
є : ,
, є
-, 93% є
[16].
( , , ,
-, ) є .
2) . Є (
, , , ,
, , , , , ,
, , ,
-) Є
-. ( , ,
), є
( , ) є
. ,
,
, .
,
. 1,
,
, ,
-,
-.
3) .
(OECD, 2008).
є
.
4) .
,
-, ' ,
,
, є , є
є
,
-,
, Internet.
'є
-,
-є є є .
є ,
-є .
-: ( ,
-, ); ( ;
); 'є (
);
( ,
-, є
-); ( ,
, ,
-- , ,
-) [4, . 132]. є
,
,
.
, є,
.
-,
( )
QS,
, ,
-, , "
-" ,
-, ( ,
-),
.
3 ,
-. ,
є
,
,
, 'є
-. QS
" - ",
є (55%) є
,
, "
" ( 10%)
-є
, є
,
.
є
,
-(Institute for Higher Education Policy, ) Є
(CEPES, ).
(IREG, 2004).
REG є
-,
:
;
;
-. REG
, 16 ,
,
,
-.
-є ,
-є
-, ,
-.
,
-, є , ,
,
-,
-. є
, [10].
-є
,
-є " REG" ( REG Recognized).
REG
QS (QS World University Rankings)
( ).
, , ,
2002 .
Є [20],
,
,
-, .
. . . є
QS World University Rankings 2012 .,
501-550 ,
2013 .
441-500. QS 2013
3 : " "
(601-650),
" " (701 +).
3.
,
(ARWU )
2003 .
" " ( 10%) : ,
;
" " ( 40% (20%+20%)), : ) -,
, , ,
, , , ( ,
); )
21 є –
21 (
-, , , ,
-, / , , , ,
-/ , , , );
" " ( 40% (20%+20%)) :
-, "Nature" "Science" (
, , 2005-2009); (
, , 2009)
(SCIE), (SSCI)
(AHCI);
" " ( 10%) –
-.
2012 .
є
(100,0 ). –
( ,
( ), )
( ).
–
17 ,
2 – , є
. 3
,
2004 .
є
" "
є 13 .
13 , :
– ; – ;
– ;
–
-; – .
2012 . 144 ,
-17 . :
– 22,1%; – 21,3%;
– 18%; – 15,4%,
– 12,7%; – 10,5%.
є
.
-:
45 – ,
12 – , 10 – ,
4 – ,
, ,
,
(Webometrics)
2004 .
Cybemetrics Lab
( )
" "( 20%): : ,
-: Google, Yahoo, Live Search, Exalead
" " ( 50%): : ,
Yahoo, Live Search Exalead
" " ( 15%): : Adobe Acrobat (.PDF), Adobe PostScript (.PS), Microsoft Word (.DOC) Microsoft Powerpoint (.PPT),
"Ц " ( 15%): :
.
-.
2009 . 10
( , ,
( ),
).
-є
QS (QS World University
Rankings)
2010 . є
"Times Higher Education"
Thomson Reuters
" - " ( 55%)
:
-; ;
; ,
;
;
"І " ( 25%),
: ;
(PhD)
; ;
" " (
10%) – -
-. є ,
,
-, ;
"І " ( 10%), :
;
.
2012 .
QS World University Rankings,
'
, , Є
* : [12], [14].
.
,
-,
є ,
є є є
-є
є " - ".
– ,
'є ,
є
-, , –
,
– ,
,
є .
є
, , є
-, ,
,
, 10-20%
-,
.
є
,
-, є
-, є
-, є
.
є
, ,
є , ,
.
-
-, ,
,
, ,
.
є є
-,
-, ,
'є
-.
є ,
-:
,
,
-є
-, , є
є .
1. Clark Burton R. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities:
Organizational Pathways of Transformation [Text] / Burton R. Clark. – IAU PRESS, Published for the IAU PRESS PERGAMON, 1998. – 167 p.
2. Leslie L. Technology Transfer and Academic Capitalism [Text] / L. Leslie, R. Oaxaca, G. Rhoades // AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook. 2001. – . 261-277.
3. Toffler E. The third wave [Text] / E. Toffler. – N. Y., 1980. – P. 560.
4. . . [ ] /
. . , . . . – .: , 2008. – 194 .
5. 2003 .
. ,
[ ] / ; . . – .: - " ",
2003. – 280 .
6. 2011.
: [ ] / .
. ; . – .: - " ", 2011. – 188 .
7. . . :
[ ] / . . //
. – 2011. – № 10. – . 82-95.
8. . . -
[ ] / . . . – . : - , 2010. – 552 .
9. . . " " "
-" [ ]
/ . . // : IV
-- "
- ", 18 2012 . – .,
2012. – . 4-8.
10. Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions :
[ ] – : http: // www.che.de/
downloads/Berlin_Principles.
11. Global Education Digest 2010: Comparing Education Statistics Across the World. – [Site]. – URL: www.uis.unesco.org/ publications/GED2010.
12. The Times Higher Education World University Rankings. – [Site]. – URL: http: // www.goo.gl/TuEou.
13. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. – [Site]. – URL: http: // www.unesko.org/education.
14. The Ranking Webometrics. – [Site]. – URL: http: //
www.webometrics.info. 14. ISCED 2011: International Standard Classification of Education. – [Site]. – URL: http://www.uis.unesco.org/ Education/Pages/international-standard-classification-of-education.aspx.
15. OECD Education at a Glance 2012: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing. – 2012. – P. 570. – [Site]. – URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2012-en.
16. Open Doors 2002 Reports : [ ] –
-: http-: // www.open-doors.iinetwork.org.
17. Varghese, N.V. (2009) Globalization, economic crisis and national strategies for higher education development. Paris: IIEP UNESCO. [Site] – URL: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001864/186428e.pdf.
18. 2007 : [
-] – : http: // www.unis.unesco.org/template/
pdf/ged/2007GED2007_rus.pdf.
19. : [ ] –
: http://www.mon.gov.ua/
20. .
[ ] / .
// . 2003. . 28. № 3. :
http://bologna.mgimo.ru/about.php?lang=ru&cat_id19&doc_id=211.
0 6 . 0 8 . 1 3
. , . . , .,
. , .
,
. ,
, .
, .
.
К : , ,
-, , , , ,
.
O. Zhylinska, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, V. Voloshina, postgraduate student
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv
GLOBALIZATION'S ASPECTS OF HIGHER EDUCATION COMMERCIALIZATION
The article is devoted to higher education current trends in the context of commercialization under globalization. The paper analyzes dynamics of the global education market, identifies factors that influence the choice of university and educational programs abroad. The importance of world universities rankings as information products that reflect the quality of education is shown. The study characterizes Ukrainian realities of globalization's activation in higher education.
JEL E44, G14, G15 336.767.2
. , . ,
.
-.
. , .
, .
К : ; ; ; ; .
є
.
є
,
-.
є .
– , , –
,
. ' ,
є
-. ,
. ,
90- XX ,
, '
,
-, .
: . . є , . . , . . ,
. . , . . , . . , . .
-, . . , . . є , . . ,
. . єє , . . , . . , . . є
-, . . , . . ' , . . ,
. . , . . , . . , . .
-, . . , .Є. , . . , . .
-, . . , . . , . . ,
. . . ,
. . . . ,
-, .
є 'є
-.
,
. ,
є
,
, , ,
є .
, є
300. є 22
( , , , ).
-є
Є .
є .
є 8 ( , , , ,
-, , , ),
-. – 7 ( -
-, , , , ,
-, ), – - - .
є
-є
(WFE), 2013 .
57 - : - , , ,
, . ,
- WFE є
-.
є [1]:
–
;
– WFE
, ;
– WFE
-;
– WFE є
;
– WFE
-. ,
-.
Є , є
(
Є ). є 'є
-, ,
(
) є Euronext. Deutsche Borse є
( '
-),
-'є .
, є
Є .
Є
-, ,
[2, . 191-198].
' є
-,
-є є .
-є ,
-, ,
. ,
, є [3,
. 303-304]:
–
( 'є ,
-,
-); –
(
є
);
