Simultaneous retrieval of aerosol and cloud properties during the MILAGRO field campaign

Relationship between aerosol number concentration and cloud droplet number concen- tration (CDNC) with (a) showing that the volcanically induced cloud albedo e ff ect is larger

Weekly cycles have been analysed in surface observations of sulfur dioxide and sul- fate concentrations, satellite observations of aerosol optical depth, cloud properties (cloud

Real-time depth estimation of benchmark and real captured scene: a “Tsukuba” test set,b real-case camera capture This discrepancy imposes the problem of evaluating the importance of

Measurements of total and fine mode fraction (FMF) AOD from the AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) and so- lar irradiance at the surface from the Solar Radiation Net- work

The well- predicted aerosol quantities, such as aerosol number, mass composition and optical properties, and the inclusion of full aerosol-cloud couplings lead to

Comparison of 24-hour average R eff , f values obtained from the NOAA CRD σ ep data and from the AERONET sunphotometer using the spectral methods (SSRI is the full sun-sky

The R e ff ,f values obtained from the spectral analyses of the CRD data are compared to those derived from sun/sky inversions using the AERONET V2 approach, and to those obtained

With the exception of the nucleation mode, particle number and volume concentration cycles are very similar to the cycles of aerosol optical properties and mass concentrations..

The cloud optical thickness and the droplet e ff ective radius are retrieved from spectral radiance data in nadir and and from hyperspectral radiances in a 40 ◦ field of view..