• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Roll-over test in primigravidae attending a public primary care service

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Roll-over test in primigravidae attending a public primary care service"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texto

(1)

SÃO PAULO

T.",'•.':',.'

~,

Luiz F rancisco M arcopito

R oll-over test in prim igravidae attending a

public prim ary care service

Division of Epidemiology,

Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil

O bjective:T o determine the roll-over test (ROT) performance in predicting pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) in primigravidae aged

15-29 years in a public primary care service. M ethod: Prospective cohort study enrolling 369 consecutive and initially normotensive

primigravidae. The ROT was applied within 28-32 weeks of pregnancy. PIH was defined as diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 90 mm Hg or systolic blood pressure (SBP) 140 mm Hg, or a rise in DBP 15 mm Hg or a rise in SBP 30 mm Hg. The ROT prognostic properties

were calculated, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROG) curve was constructed. R esults: For the 20 mm Hg cutoff point,

sensitivity was 20% and specificity was 93%. Positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, 23% and 92%, for a PIH

cumulative incidence of 9.5%. W ith other cutoff points, the ROG curve showed a poor discriminatory value of the test. C oncliJsion:

The ROT was not useful for predicting PIH in a primary prenatal care setting.

Uniterms: Pregnancy. Pregnancy-induced hypertension. Toxemia. Pre-eclampsia. RolI-Over Test.

INTROOUCTION

H

y p erten sio n w h ich co m p licates p reg n an cy is a

m ajo r cau se o f p rem atu rity an d p erin atal

m o rtaIity . IA n y Iarg e u n seIected g ro u p o f p reg n an t

w o m en w ith raised b Io o d p ressu re w ill co n tain in d iv id u aIs

w h o se h y p erten sio n an ted ates th e p reg n an cy , th o se w h o se

b Io o d p ressu re b eg an to rise after th e en d o f th e seco n d

trim ester (p reg n an cy -in d u ced h y p erten sio n - P IH ), an d a

few w ith p re-ex istin g h y p erten sio n ex acerb ated b y th e

p reg n an cy . It is reco g n ized th at p rim ig rav id ae are at h ig h est

risk o fP IH .2

In m o st p arts o f th e w o rld , p ren atal care serv ices, w h en

accessib le, h av e th e m o st p ro fo u n d effect o n th e

A dress for correspondence:

Luiz F rancisco M arcopito R ua P edro de T oledo, 675

S ão P aulo/S P - B rasil - C E P 04039-032

co n seq u en ces o f h y p erten sio n in p reg n an cy , b u t n o t in its

p rev en tio n . If th e ro ll-o v er test (R O T ), p u b lish ed b y G an t

et aI.3in 1 9 7 4 an d still tau g h t in m ed icaI sch o o ls, is in fact

accu rate, it co u ld b e u sefu l fo r id en tify in g h ig h er risk g ro u p s

o f p rim ig rav id ae, w h o w o u ld d eserv e sp ecial atten tio n .

T h is p ro sp ectiv e stu d y w as th erefo re aim ed at

d eterm in in g th e v aIu e o f th e R O T in p red ictin g P IH

d ev elo p m en t in p rim ig rav id ae ag ed 1 5 -2 9 y ears Iiv in g in th e

eastem reg io n o f G reater S ao P au lo , B razil, a 1 0 w -in co m e

u rb an area, w h o atten d ed a p rim ary p ren atal care p u b lic serv ice

(L eo n o r M en d es d e B arro s M atern ity H o sp ital).

PARTICIPANTS ANO METHOOS

T h e in cIu sio n cri teria w ere as fo llo w s: a) sp o n tan eo u s

d em an d fo r ro u tin e p ren atal assistan ce in th e serv ice w h ere

th e stu d y w as b ased ; b ) rep o rtin g b ein g p rim ig rav id a at th e

MARCOPITO, L.F. - Roll-over test in primigravidae attending a public primary care service

(2)

1 5 3 4

tim e o f re g istra tio n ; c ) 1 5 -2 9 y e a rs o ld ; a n d d ) n o rm o te n siv e (b lo o d p re ssu re lo w e r th a n 1 4 0 /9 0 m m H g b e fo re th e 2 4 th w e e k o f p re g n a llc y ) w ith o u t th e u se o f a n ti-h y p e rte n siv e d ru g s.

T h e e x c lu sio n c rite ria (a n d th e re sp e c tiv e n u m b e rs e x c lu d e d b y e a c h c rite rio n ) w e re a s fo lIo w s: a ) in th e first c o n ta c t, e x p e c ta tio n o f m o v in g to a n u n k n o w n "a d d re ss (7 ); b ) c o n tin u e d in a b ility to g iv e a p re c ise h o m e a d d re ss a t th e se c o n d c o n ta c t (1 0 ); c ) m isc a rria g e b e fo re th e 2 4 th w e e k o f p re g n a n c y (5 ); d ) d e te rm in a tio n , th ro u g h fu rth e r c o n ta c t, th a t th e w o m a n w a s e ith e r n o t a p rim ig ra v id a (4 ) o r n o t p re g n a n t (3 ); e ) su ffe re d c o n g e n ita l v a sc u la r d ise a se (1 ); o r f) m a d e re g u la r u se o f a sp irin o r d ru g s k n o w n a s v a so a c tiv e s (z e ro ). O u t o f 4 2 2 p rim ig ra v id a e c o n sid e re d e lig ib le , 3 9 4 w e re su b m itte d to R O T .

L o ss d u rin g fo lIo w -u p w a s m in im iz e d b y sp e c ia l e ffo rts a im e d a t th o se (6 8 % ) w h o m isse d a t le a st o n e a p p o in tm e n t: 4 6 te le p h o n e c a lIs w e re m a d e , 7 3 1 le tte rs w e re se n t (m a x im u m o fth re e p e r w o m a n )4 , a n d 1 5 1 h o m e v isits w e re p e rfo rm e d (in th e c a se o f n o n -re sp o n se to th e th ird le tte r). T h e se e ffo rts re su lte d in fo lIo w -u p lo sse s o f o n ly 6 .3 % (2 5 p a rtic ip a n ts). A Iso , 3 4 h o sp ita Is h a d to b e v isite d in o rd e r to g e t th e m e d ic a I re c o rd s o f th o se (m o re th a n 5 0 % ) w h o g a v e b irth in h o sp ita Is o th e r th a n th a t w h e re th e stu d y w a s b a se d . A lI th e re m a in in g 3 6 9 w e re fo lIo w e d u p fro m 2 4 w e e k s o f p re g n a n c y u n til o n e m o n th a fte r d e liv e ry .

T h e R O T c o n siste d o f th e sa m e p ro c e d u re p e rfo rm e d b y G a n t e t a I. 3 , e x c e p t th a t th e p a rtic ip a n ts' re sp o n se s to a n g io te n sin II a fte r th e te st w e re n o t e v a lu a te d . A t th e . tim e o f stu d y , e a c h p a rtic ip a n t w a s p la c e d in th e le ft la te ra l

re c u m b e n t p o sitio n , a n d b lo o d p re ssu re m e a su re m e n ts in th e rig h t u p p e r a rm w e re re p e a te d a t fiv e m in u te s in te rv a ls, u n til a c o n sta n t b a se lin e d ia sto lic b lo o d p re ssu re h a d b e e n e sta b lish e d . W h e n th e d ia sto lic b lo o d p re ssu re h a d b e c o m e c o n sta n t, th e su b je c t w a s tu rn e d to th e su p in e p o sitio n a n d th e b lo o d p re ssu re w a s m e a su re d im m e d ia te ly a n d a g a in fiv e m in u te s la te r w h ile th e p a rtic ip a n t w a s stilI su p in e .

T h e R O T w a s c o n d u c te d b y th e sa m e o b se rv e r e v e ry tim e , w h o w a s tra in e d to m e a su re b lo o d p re ssu re w ith th e L o n d o n S c h o o l o f H y g ie n e a n d T ro p ic a l M e d ic in e so u n d ta p e s. A lI th e p a rtic ip a n ts w e re in v ite d to u rin a te b e fo re th e te st. T h e K o ro tk o ff first p h a se w a s ta k e n a s th e sy sto lic b lo o d p re ssu re . T h e d ia sto lic w a s re c o rd e d a s th e K o ro tk o ff fifth p h a se - o r th e fo u rth , if th e fifth p h a se w a s n o t d e te c te d b e fo re th e v a lu e re a c h e d z e ro .

A n in c re a se in d ia sto lic b lo o d p re ssu re o f a t le a st 2 0 m m H g , fro m th e le ft la te ra l to th e su p in e p o sitio n , w a s ta k e n a s a p o sitiv e te st, b u t o th e r c u to ff p o in ts w e re c o n sid e re d in th e a n a ly sis. S e n sitiv ity a n d sp e c ific ity w e re

c a lc u la te d w ith su c h d iffe re n t c u to ff p o in ts, in o rd e r to g e n e ra te a re c e iv e r o p e ra tin g c h a ra c te ristic (R O C ) c u rv e6

P IH w a s d e fin e d a s7a d ia sto lic b lo o d p re ssu re (D B P )

o f a t le a st 9 0 m m H g o r a sy sto lic b lo o d p re ssu re (S B P ) o f a t le a st 1 4 0 m m H g , o r a rise in D B P o f a t le a st 1 5 m m H g o r a rise in S B P o f a t le a st 3 0 m m H g . T h e d ia g n o sis o f P IH w a s c o n firm e d w h e n su c h b lo o d p re ssu re re a d in g s w e re o b ta in e d o n a t le a st tw o o c c a sio n s, six h o u rs o r m o re a p a rt. R e g a rd in g th e re v ie w o f m e d ic a I. re c o rd s fro m a ro u n d th e tim e o f d e liv e ry , th e sa m e b lo o d p re ssu re c rite ria w e re a p p lie d , a n d th e m e d ic a I re c o rd re v ie w w a s d o n e b y th e sa m e o b se rv e r, b lin d to th e p re v io u s b lo o d p re ssu re le v e Is o f th e p a rtic ip a n ts.

R E S U L T S

S o m e c h a ra c te ristic s o f th e 3 6 9 p rim ig ra v id a e a n a ly z e d a re sh o w n in T a b le 1 . In th e se w o m e n , th e o v e ra lI risk o fP IH d e v e lo p m e n t w a s 9 .5 % (3 5 /3 6 9 ), w ith th e 9 5 % c o n fid e n c e in te rv a l b e tw e e n 6 .5 % a n d 1 2 .5 % .

T a b le 2 sh o w s th e te st re su lts fo r th e c u to ff p o in t o f ~ D B P ~ 2 0 m m H g . S e n siv ity (7 /3 5 ) w a s 2 0 % , a n d o sp e c ific ity (3 1 1 /3 3 4 ), 9 3 % . P re d ic tiv e v a lu e s (fo r a P IH c u m u la tiv e in c id e n c e o f9 .5 % ) w e re : p o sitiv e (7 /3 0 ), 2 3 % , a n d n e g a tiv e (3 1 1 /3 3 9 ), 9 2 % . T h e se p re d ic tiv e v a lu e s, p a rtic u la rly th e n e g a tiv e , p ro v e d to b e q u ite c lo se to th o se w h ic h w o u ld h a v e b e e n e x p e c te d if th e te sts h a d n o t b e e n p e rfo rm e d .

T a b le 3 sh o w s th e R O T se n sitiv itie s a n d sp e c ific itie s fo r d iffe re n t ~ D B P c u to ff p o in ts. T h o se n u m b e rs w e re u se d to c o n stru c t th e R O C c u rv e e x h ib ite d in th e F ig u re , w h ic h sh o w s th e p o o r R O T p ro g n o stic v a lu e fo r P IH in th e stu d ie d p rim ig ra v id a e .

D IS C U S S IO N

G a n t e t a I.3 o b se rv e d 8 8 % se n sitiv ity (1 5 /1 7 ) a n d 9 5 % sp e c ific ity (2 0 /2 1 ) fo r th e R O T , in a sa m p le w ith P IH o c c u rre n c e o f a lm o st 4 5 % (1 7 /3 8 ), a fig u re fa r d iffe re n t fro m th a t o b se rv e d in u n se le c te d p re g n a n t w o m e n . T h is m a y su g g e st p ro b le m s o f p a rtic ip a n ts' se le c tio n o r u n b lin d e d a sse ssm e n t a n d P IH d ia g n o sis c rite ria .

In th e sa m e w o rk , G a n t e t a I. 3 a lso e v a lu a te d th e re sp o n se to a n g io te n sin II a d m in istra tio n (w ith a n in fu sio n

M A R C O P IT O , L .F . - R o ll- o v e r te s t in p r im ig r a v id a e a tte n d in g a p u b lic p r im a r y c a r e s e r v ic e

(3)

1 5 3 5

la b ia 1

S o m e ch a ra cte ristics o f th e 3 6 9 a n a lyze d p rim ig ra vid a e .

la b ia 3

R o lI o ve r te st se n sitivitie s a n d sp e cificitie s fo r p re g n a n cy-in d u ce d h yp e rte n sio n , a cco rd in g to

d iffe re n t cu to ff p o in ts.

*D ifferen ce fro m su p in e to left lateral d iasto lic b lo o d p ressu re, in m m H g .

/ ,/' ,/' ,/' ,/' ,/' ,/' ,/' ,/'

C h a ra cte ristics N u m b e r (% )

A G E (ye a rs)

1 5 -1 9 1 6 1 4 3 .6

2 0 -2 4 1 5 2 4 1 .2

2 5 -2 9 5 6 1 5 .2

E T H N IC G R O U P

W h ite 2 0 6 5 5 .8

A frica n 1 5 9 4 3 .1

A sia n 4 1 .1

E D U C A T IO N (h ig h e st sch o o l g ra d e co m p le te d )

0 -3 4 7 1 2 .7

4 - 7 2 3 2 6 2 .9

8 o r m o re 9 0 2 4 .4

la b ia 2

R o ll-o ve r te st re su lts fo r th e cu to ff p o in t o f A D B P ~ 2 0

m m

H g .

P IH * d e ve lo p m e n t

Y e s N o T o ta l

C u to ff p o in t (L \D B P m m H g )*

2 0 o r m o re " 1 4 o r m o re

8 o r m o re 2 o r m o re -4 o r m o re

1 0 0 1 0 0

8 0

~

•..

"S; 6 0

; ; "Ui C 4 0 (1 ) UI 2 0 o 80

S e n sitivity

(% )

( 7 /3 5 ) = 2 0 .0 (1 7 /3 5 )

=

4 8 .6 (2 5 /3 5 )

=

6 5 .7 (2 9 /3 5 )

=

8 2 .9 (3 4 /3 5 )

=

9 7 .1

E S P E C IF IC IT Y

6 0 4 0

S p e cificity

(% )

(3 1 1 /3 3 4 )

=

9 3 .1 (1 9 1 /3 3 4 ) = 5 7 .2 (1 2 0 /3 3 4 )

=

3 5 .9 ( 3 5 /3 3 4 )

=

1 0 .5 ( 5 /3 3 4 )

=

1 .5

2 0

R o ll-o ve r

te st

T o ta l

P o sitive

N e g a tive

7

2 8

3 5

23

3 1 1

3 3 4

30

3 3 9

3 6 9

F ig u re - R e ce ive r o p e ra tin g ch a ra cte ristic cu rve (so lid lin e ) o f th e ro ll-o ve r te st p e rfo rm a n ce in th e p ro g n o sis o f p re g n a n cy-in d u ce d h yp e rte n sio n .

* P reg n an cy -in d u ced h y p erten sio n

p u m p ) a fte r th e R O T , a n d o b se rv e d a h ig h c o rre la tio n w ith th e R O T re su lts. T h is p ro c e d u re , h o w e v e r, w a s n o t te ste d in th e p re se n t stu d y , a s it w o u ld n o t h a v e b e e n fe a sib Ie in a p u b lic p re n a ta I c a re se rv ic e a s c ro w d e d a s th e o n e w h e re th is stu d y w a s b a se d .

T h is tim e -c o n su m in g (a Im o st th irty m in u te s) te st w o u Id c e rta in Iy b e c o n sid e re d fo r p re v e n tiv e p u rp o se s, if it p re se n te d a n a ttra c tiv e p e rfo rm a n c e in d e fin in g

a

h ig h risk g ro u p o f p rim ig ra v id a e fo r d e v e Io p in g P IH . H o w e v e r, a s h a s b e e n sh o w n , th a t w a s n o t th e c a se .

M a n y in v e stig a to rs h a v e stu d ie d th e R O T p e rfo rm a n c e in se v e ra I p a rts o f th e w o rId : so m e8

-12 h a v e

re c o m m e n d e d its u se , a n d o th e rsl3

-1 8 h a v e n o L

M e th o d o Io g ic a I d isc re p a n c ie s m a y a c c o u n t fo r su c h a d iv isio n o f o p in io n s: in tw o o f th e se stu d ie slO,1 7 , th e c u

t-o ff p t-o in t o f a p o sitiv e R O T w a s d iffe re n t to i1 D B P ~ 2 0 m m H g ; in tw oI2

,1 6 , d ia g n o sis o f P IH in c Iu d e d c rite ria

o th e r th a n b Io o d p re ssu re o n ly ; in a t Ie a st th re e 8 ,1 4 ,1 8 it

w a s n o t sta te d w h e th e r th e m e d ic a I re c o rd re v ie w e r fo r P IH d ia g n o sis w a s b Iin d to th e R O T re su Its. T h e

re m a in in g1 3

,1 5 still sh o w e d c o n flic tin g re su Its o n th e R O T

p e rfo rm a n c e " , p o ssib Iy b e c a u se o f d iffe rin g P IH d ia g n o sis c rite ria , in sp ite o f b e in g b a se d o n b Io o d p re ssu re o n Iy . N o n e o f th e se stu d ie s w a s c a rrie d o u t in a p rim a ry c a re se ttin g .

C O N C L U S IO N

T h e p o o r p e rfo rm a n c e o f th e R O T in p re d ic tin g fu rth e r P IH d o e s n o t re c o m m e n d its u " se in p rim ig ra v id a e in a p rim a ry p re n a ta I c a re se ttin g .

A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S

D r. M a rc o p ito w a s fin a n c ia lly su p p o rte d b y F A P E S P 9 5 /4 5 2 8 -0 w h e n th is p a p e r w a s w ritte n .

M A R C O P IT O , L .F . - R o ll-o ve r te st in p rim ig ra vid a e a tte n d in g a p u b lic p rim a ry ca re se rvice

(4)

1 5 3 6

REFERENCES

1 . D a v ie s A M , D u n lo p W . H y p e rte n s io n in p re g n a n c y . In : B a rro n S L , T h o m s o n A M , e d ito rs , O b s te tric a l E p id e m io lo g y . L o n d o n : A c a d e m ic P re s s . 1 9 8 3 : 1 6 8 -2 0 8 .

2 . D a v ie s A M . E p id e m io lo g y o f h y p e rte n s iv e d is o rd e rs o f p re g n a n c y . B u lI W o rld H e a lth O rg a n 1 9 7 9 ; 5 7 : 3 7 3 -3 8 6 . 3 . G a n t N F , C h a n d S , W o rle y R J , W h o lIe y P J , C ro s b y U D ,

M a c D o n a ld p c . A c lin ic a I te s t u s e fu l fo r p re d ic tin g th e d e v e lo p m e n t o f a c u te h y p e rte n s io n p re g n a n c y . A m J O b s te t G y n e c o l1 9 7 4 ; 1 2 0 : 1 -7 .

4 . M a rc o p ito L F , B a ru z z i M , S n itc o v s k y M - E s tu d o p re lim in a r s o b re o p a c ie n te a m b u la to ria l. fa lto s o e o u s o d o c o rre io p a ra re c u p e rá -lo , R e v A s s M e d B ra s il 1 9 8 8 ; 3 4 :1 0 1 -1 0 5 . 5 . R o s e G . S ta n d a rd is a tio n o f o b s e rv e rs in b lo o d p re s s u re

m e a s u re m e n t. L a n c e t 1 9 6 5 ; i: 6 7 3 -6 7 4 .

6 . S a c k e tt D L , H a y n e s R B , G u y a tt G H , T u g w e lI P . C lin ic a I e p id e m io lo g y : a b a s ic s c ie n c e fo r c lin ic a I m e d ic in e . B o s to n : L ittle B ro w n . 1 9 9 1 . 4 4 1 p .

7 . C u n n in g h a m F G , M a c D o n a ld P C , G a n t N F . H y p e rte n s iv e d is o rd e rs in p re g n a n c y . In : _ e d s , W ilIia m s 'o b s te tric s , 1 8 th e d itio n . N o rw a lk : A p p le to n & L a n g e . 1 9 8 9 : ,6 5 3 -6 9 4 . 8 . K a rb h a ri D , H a rrig a n J T , L a m a g ra R . T h e s u p in e

h y p e rte n s iv e te s t a s a p re d ic to r o f in c ip ie n t p re -e c la m p s ia . A m e r J O b s te t G y n e c 1 9 7 7 ; 1 2 7 : 6 2 0 -6 2 2 .

9 . M a rs h a lI G v i, N e w m a n R L . R o lI-o v e r te s te A m J O b s te t G y n e c o l 1 9 7 7 ; 1 2 7 :6 2 3 -6 2 5 ._

M A R C O P I T O , L . F . - R o ll- o v e r t e s t in p r im ig r a v id a e a t t e n d in g a p u b lic p r im a r y c a r e s e r v ic e

1 0 . P e c k T M . A s im p le , te s t fo r p re d ic tin g p re g n a n c y -in d u c e d h y p e rte n s io n . O b s te t G y n e c 1 9 7 7 ; 5 0 : 6 1 5 -6 1 7 .

1 1 . V ig g ia n o M G C , S ilv a C M , A lv e s N e to J , B a rro s L C P , M a g a lh a e s N e to M , M o ra e s V A . R o lI-o v e r te s t e p re s s ã o a rte ria l m e d ia . J B ra s G in e c o l 1 9 7 9 ; 8 7 : 2 4 9 -2 6 4 .

1 2 . U ja la m b k a r A N , S u ta ria U D . T h e ro lI-o v e r te s t to p re d ic t to x e m ia in p re g n a n c y . In t J G y n e c o l O b s te t 1 9 8 1 ; 1 9 : 3 2 7 -3 -3 1 .

1 3 . G u s d o n J r J p , A n d e rs o n S G , M a y W J . A c lin ic a I e v a lu a tio n o f th e ro lI-o v e r te s t fo r p re g n a n c y -in d u c e d h y p e rte n s io n . A m J O b s te t G y n e c o l1 9 7 7 ; 1 2 7 : 1 -3 .

.1 4 . O 'G ra d y J p , H a m ilto n C , M o rris J A , D a v id s o n E C ., S e q u e n tia l e v a lu a tio n o f th e s u p in e h y p e rte n s io n o f ro lI-o v e r te s t in a h ig h ris k p o p u la tio n . G y n e c o t In v e s t 1 9 7 7 ; 8 : 2 8 2 -2 8 7 .

1 5 . P h e la n J p , E v e rid g e G J , W ild e r T L , N e w m a n C . Is th e s u p in e p re s s o r te s t a n a d e q u a te m e a n s o f p re d ic tin g a c u te h y p e rte n s io n in p re g n a n c y ? A m J O b s te t G y n e c o l 1 9 7 7 ;

1 2 8 : 1 7 3 -1 7 6 : '

1 6 . B e n e d e tti T J , R e a d J A , M ille r F C . T h e e ffe c t o fh y d ro s ta tic p re s s u re o n th e in te rp re ta tio n o f th e s u p in e p re s s o r te s te J R e p ro d M e d 1 9 8 2 ; 2 7 : 1 6 1 -1 6 4 .

1 7 . H a rtik a in e n R , E rk k o la R . In a d e q u a c y o f ro lIo v e r te s t in p re d ic tin g p re g n a n c y -in d u c e d h y p e rte n s io n . A c ta O b s te t G y n e c S c a n d 1 9 8 2 ; 6 1 : 5 1 1 -5 1 2 .

1 8 . T u n b rid g e R D G , D o n n a i P . P re g n a n c y -a s s o c ia te d h y p e rte n s io n , a c o m p a ris o n o f its p re d ic tio n b y ro lI-o v e r te s t a n d p la s m a n o ra d re n a lin e m e a s u re m e n t in 1 0 0 p rim ig ra v id a e . B r J O b s te t G y n a e c o l1 9 8 3 ; 9 0 : 1 0 2 7 -1 0 3 '2 .

I

Referências

Documentos relacionados

syphilis, cytomegalovirus, hepatitis and HIV among pregnant women receiving care at a Public Health Service, São Paulo State,

Assim como serve de recurso para o Gmail, a Amazon e o Last FM relacionarem-se com seus usuários, por meio de recomendações do sistema, a vigilância digital

http://www.rrh.org.au. The domiciliary support service in Portugal and the change of paradigm in care provision. The science of asking questions. Integrated primary care in

The study presented in this paper identifies probable changes generated in the care process of a primary healthcare service in a municipality of Santa Catarina, Brazil, part of

Conclusion: Patients seeking the public health service have less access to medical care, reaching the system at more advanced stages of disease.. The public service also

O Governo Federal lançou em julho de 2011 o Programa Nacional de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica (PMAQ-AB), uma atitude louvável desde que adequada a

Therefore, whereas some of the inequalities in service provision and in public health results are attenuated by the amplification of SUS services – especially in primary care –

Trichomonas vaginalis in women attending a primary health care service and to evaluate factors associated with some of these infec- tions in the population under