PARCERIA NACIONAL
PELA MOBILIDADE POR BICICLETA
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A successful completion of a research is always the
result of a collaborative process between individuals
and their institutions. This research - entitled Brazilian
Cyclist Profile – is no exception to the rule. The work
presented in this publication is the result of a survey
conducted with the support of many individuals and
Brazilian institutions.
88+
30
+
60
+
76
This publication aims to present the main
results of the National Survey about
the Brazilian Cyclist Profile and their
motivations to use a bike.
5012 cyclists were interviewed in ten
Brazilian cities among different regions:
Aracaju, Belo Horizonte, Brasilia, Porto
Alegre, Manaus, Niterói, Recife, Rio de
Janeiro, Salvador and São Paulo. In order
to accomplish this task, more than 100
researchers went to the streets during
the months of July and August of 2015.
This is the first Brazilian study about the
profile of urban cyclists with national
coverage and fills a gap where there was
limited data about cyclists and the use of
the bike as urban transportation in Brazil.
As an immediate use of the data
collected and analyzed in this research,
it is to provide information for public
officials, urban planners and other
stakeholders to create a robust and
more precise agenda of public policies
and actions to promote cycling as a
transportation mode.
There is a revolution going on in the
Brazilian cities with urban cyclists as
protagonists: bikes have been seen more
often in the streets.
We are experiencing the birth of an
emerging culture of urban mobility –
focused on pedestrians and cyclists
– in response to social, economic and
environmental challenges faced by the
Brazilian society.
Despite of the urban chages that already
occurred, , the Brazilian cities condition
is far from ideal. The hegemonic urban
development pattern still has the private
car as a protagonist and cyclists and
pedestrians are relegated to a second
place. This situation has led to the
collapse of our cities and reveals the
urgent need for a shift in the Brazilian
urban development model.
There are many challenges, but we do
believe in a better future powered by
the transformation of Brazilian cities into
inviting environments for cyclists. We are
looking for a democratic and accessible
city model!
O percentual de entrevistados
em relação à população foi o
mesmo em todas as cidades.
As entrevistas foram feitas
com pessoas que pedalam pelo
menos uma vez por semana
como meio de transporte,
abordadas pedalando,
empurrando ou estacionando a
bicicleta.
As entrevistas foram
distribuídas igualmente no
tecido urbano pelas áreas
centrais, intermediárias e
periféricas das cidades. Estas
áreas foram definidas pela
organização da sociedade civil
local envolvida.
As entrevistas foram realizadas
MAIN
DESTINATIONS
88.1%
30.5%
59.2%
76%
WORK
SCHOOL / COLLEGE
SHOPPING
LEISURE
MANAUS
78
+57
+1
+33
+57
+33
77.8%
56.6%
33.4%
57%
33.4%
0.7%
BRASÍLIA
60
+75
+52
+22
+57
+38
59.9%
74.4%
52.2%
57.3%
37.6%
22.2%
BELO
HORIZONTE
71
+80
+15
+33
+56
+36
71%
79.8%
33%
56.4%
36.4%
14.4%
71
+52
+15
+33
+56
+36
ARACAJU
69.3%
52.3%
42%
54.5%
29.5%
6%
NITERÓI
71
+60
+41
+35
+64
+29
71.3%
59.7%
34.5%
64.4%
28.7%
41%
RIO
81
+42
+35
+31
+57
+30
81.2%
42.5%
30.7%
56.6%
27.7%
34.8%
RECIFE
90
+53
+18
+33
+64
+33
89.6%
41.9%
33.1%
63.7%
32.7%
18.3%
63
+70
+20
+29
+56
+39
62.9%
66.9%
28.6
55.8%
39.3%
20.1%
PORTO ALEGRE
SALVADOR
70
+77
+12
+35
+56
+30
69.4%
52.6%
35%
56.3%
29.7%
11.8%
SÃO PAULO
73
+71
+30
+28
+54
+40
73.2%
70.9%
28.2%
54.2%
39%
27.8%
NATIONAL
73
+62
+26
+30
+56
+34
73.6%
61.8%
30%
56.2%
34.3%
26.4%
USES BIKE 5 DAYS OR MORE PER WEEK USES BIKE AS MEAN OF TRANSPORT LESS THEN 5 YEARS
USED BIKE IN COMBINATION WITH OTHER TRANSPORTATION MODE HAS INCOME BETWEEN 1 AND 2 MINIMUM SALARIES
TAKES BETWEEN 10 TO 30 MINUTES IN THEIR BIKE RIDES
BRASIL
MOTIVATION TO START USING
THE BIKE AS AN URBAN
TRANSPORTATION MODE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN2
2.2%
+
98A
COST20
19.6%
+
80A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
43
42.9%
+
57A
HEALTH CONCERN24
24.2%
+
76A
OTHERS10
10.5%
+
90A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.6%
EVERYDAY
PROBLEMS
LACK OF CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE24+76A
26.6%
PUBLIC SAFETY7
7.4%
+
93A
TRANSIT SAFETY19
22.7%
+
81A
EDUCATION IN THE TRANSIT37
34.6%
+
63A
SIGNALING4
3.3%
+
96A
OTHERS8
4.6%
+
92A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.8%
MOTIVATION FOR
CONTINUE CYCLING
Percentual sem resPosta 0.6%
MOTIVATION TO
CYCLING MORE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN3
3.4%
+
97A
COST18
17.7%
+
82A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
45
44.6%
+
55A
HEALTH CONCERN26
25.9%
+
74A
OTHERS8
7.8%
+
92A
BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE49
50%
+
51A
PUBLIC SAFETY14
11.8%
+
86A
TRANSIT SAFETY17
21.5%
+
83A
BIKE PARKING7
5.9%
+
93A
TREE-LINED STREETS AND BIKE LANES1
4.7%
+
99A
OTHERS10
5.7%
+
90A
MOTIVATION TO START USING
THE BIKE AS AN URBAN
TRANSPORTATION MODE
MOTIVATION FOR
CONTINUE CYCLING
MOTIVATION TO
CYCLING MORE
MAIN
DESTINATIONS
EVERYDAY
PROBLEMS
ARACAJu
POPULATION: 623 THOUSAND INHABITANTS
Percentual sem resPosta 1.2%
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONCERN COST SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY HEALTH CONCERN OTHERS
4
4.5%
+
96A
18
18.2%
+
82A
51
51.1%
49A
+
15
14.8%
+
85A
10
10.2%
+
90A
Percentual sem resPosta 1.1%
33
33%
+
67A
36
36.4%
+
64A
23
22.7%
+
77A
7
6.8%
+
93A
0
+
100A
0%
Percentual sem resPosta 1.2%
BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE
PUBLIC
SAFETY TRANSIT SAFETY PARKINGBIKE STREETS AND TREE-LINED BIKE LANES
OTHERS
53
53.4%
+
47A
22
21.6%
+
78A
14
13.6%
+
86A
3
3.4%
+
97A
2
2.3%
+
98A
4
4.5%
+
96A
WORK
84
83.9%
+
16A
SCHOOL / COLLEGE28
28.2%
+
72A
SHOPPING68
67.7%
+
32A
LEISURE59
58.8%
+
41A
Percentual sem resPosta 1.2%
LACK OF CYCLING
INFRASTRUCTURE PUBLIC SAFETY TRANSITSAFETY EDUCATION IN THE TRANSIT SIGNALING OTHERS
35+65A
35.2%
10
10.2%
+
90A
24
23.9%
+
76A
23
22.7%
+
77A
2
2.3%
+
98A
4
4.5%
+
96A
ENVIRONMENTAL
MOTIVATION TO START USING
THE BIKE AS AN URBAN
TRANSPORTATION MODE
MOTIVATION FOR
CONTINUE CYCLING
MOTIVATION TO
CYCLING MORE
MAIN
DESTINATIONS
EVERYDAY
PROBLEMS
Belo
HoRIZoNTe
POPULATION: 2.4 MILLIONS OF INHABITANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
2
2.1%
+
98A
COST
21
20.7%
+
79A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
41
41%
+
59A
HEALTH CONCERN27
26.6%
+
73A
OTHERS7
7.4%
+
93A
Percentual sem resPosta 2.2%
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
2
2.1%
+
98A
COST
21
20.7%
+
79A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
37
37%
+
63A
HEALTH CONCERN33
32.7%
+
67A
OTHERS6
6.4%
+
94A
Percentual sem resPosta 1.2%
WORK
91
91.4%
+
9A
SCHOOL / COLLEGE51
50.6%
+
49A
SHOPPING67
67.4%
+
33A
LEISURE88
88.1%
+
12A
LACK OF CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE25+75A
25.3%
PUBLIC SAFETY2
2.1%
+
98A
TRANSIT SAFETY38
37.8%
+
62A
EDUCATION IN THE TRANSIT30
29.8%
+
70A
SIGNALING1
0.8%
+
99A
OTHERS3
2.9%
+
97A
Percentual sem resPosta 1.3%
BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE
53
52.7%
+
47A
PUBLIC SAFETY4
3.7%
+
96A
TRANSIT SAFETY29
29%
+
71A
BIKE PARKING4
4.5%
+
96A
TREE-LINED STREETS AND BIKE LANES4
4.3%
+
96A
OTHERS5
4.8%
+
95A
MOTIVATION TO START USING
THE BIKE AS AN URBAN
TRANSPORTATION MODE
MOTIVATION FOR
CONTINUE CYCLING
MOTIVATION TO
CYCLING MORE
MAIN
DESTINATIONS
EVERYDAY
PROBLEMS
BRASÍlIA
POPULATION: 2.8 MILLIONS OF INHABITANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
8
8.1%
+
92A
COST
14
14.5%
+
86A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
36
36.5%
+
64A
HEALTH CONCERN34
33.7%
+
66A
OTHERS7
6.7%
+
93A
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN5
4.8%
+
95A
COST21
21%
+
79A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
31
30.9%
+
69A
HEALTH CONCERN32
32.3%
+
68A
OTHERS11
10.6%
+
89A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.4%
Percentual sem resPosta 0.5%
BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE
43
43.4%
+
57A
PUBLIC SAFETY18
17.8%
+
82A
TRANSIT SAFETY26
25.9%
+
74A
BIKE PARKING6
6.5%
+
94A
TREE-LINED STREETS AND BIKE LANES3
3.5%
+
97A
OTHERS2
2.8%
+
98A
WORK82
81.6%
+
18A
SCHOOL / COLLEGE77
76.9%
+
23A
SHOPPING64
64.2%
+
36A
LEISURE82
82.3%
+
18A
LACK OF CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE29+71A
28.6%
PUBLIC SAFETY17
16.6%
+
83A
TRANSIT SAFETY22
22.4%
+
78A
EDUCATION IN THE TRANSIT22
22.4%
+
78A
SIGNALING5
5.5%
+
95A
OTHERS3
3.5%
+
97A
Percentual sem resPosta 1%
MOTIVATION TO START USING
THE BIKE AS AN URBAN
TRANSPORTATION MODE
MOTIVATION FOR
CONTINUE CYCLING
MOTIVATION TO
CYCLING MORE
MAIN
DESTINATIONS
EVERYDAY
PROBLEMS
MANAuS
POPULATION: 2 MILLIONS OF INHABITANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
2
1.7%
+
98A
COST
27
27.2%
+
73A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
50
50%
+
50A
HEALTH CONCERN19
19.2%
+
81A
OTHERS2
1.7%
+
98A
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN1
1%
+
99A
COST21
21.5%
+
79A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
55
55.3%
+
45A
HEALTH CONCERN19
19.2%
+
81A
OTHERS3
2.6%
+
97A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.4%
Percentual sem resPosta 0.2%
BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE
39
38.7%
+
61A
PUBLIC SAFETY3
2.6%
+
97A
TRANSIT SAFETY41
40.7%
+
59A
BIKE PARKING4
3.6%
+
96A
TREE-LINED STREETS AND BIKE LANES13
12.6%
+
87A
OTHERS1
1.3%
+
99A
WORK97
97.4%
+
3A
SCHOOL / COLLEGE20
19.7%
+
80A
SHOPPING84
83.7%
+
16A
LEISURE67
67.6%
+
33A
LACK OF CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE20+80A
20.2%
PUBLIC SAFETY1
0.3%
+
99A
TRANSIT SAFETY28
28.5%
+
72A
EDUCATION IN THE TRANSIT46
46.4%
+
54A
SIGNALING3
2.6%
+
97A
OTHERS2
1.7%
+
98A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.3%
MOTIVATION TO START USING
THE BIKE AS AN URBAN
TRANSPORTATION MODE
MOTIVATION FOR
CONTINUE CYCLING
MOTIVATION TO
CYCLING MORE
MAIN
DESTINATIONS
EVERYDAY
PROBLEMS
NITeRÓI
POPULATION: 495 THOUSAND INHABITANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
5
4.6%
+
95A
COST
28
27.6%
+
72A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
47
47.1%
+
53A
HEALTH CONCERN13
12.6%
+
87A
OTHERS7
6.9%
+
93A
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN2
2.3%
+
98A
COST25
25.3%
+
75A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
39
39.1%
+
61A
HEALTH CONCERN25
25.3%
+
75A
OTHERS7
6.9%
+
93A
Percentual sem resPosta 1.1%
Percentual sem resPosta 1.2%
BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE
34
34.5%
+
66A
PUBLIC SAFETY7
6.9%
+
93A
TRANSIT SAFETY38
37.9%
+
62A
BIKE PARKING7
6.9%
+
93A
TREE-LINED STREETS AND BIKE LANES10
10.3%
+
90A
OTHERS2
2.3%
+
98A
WORK75
75.1%
+
25A
SCHOOL / COLLEGE24
24.2%
+
76A
SHOPPING70
70.4%
+
30A
LEISURE76
76%
+
24A
LACK OF CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE37+63A
36.8%
PUBLIC SAFETY6
5.7%
+
94A
TRANSIT SAFETY22
21.8%
+
78A
EDUCATION IN THE TRANSIT31
31%
+
69A
SIGNALING3
3.4%
+
97A
OTHERS0
+
100A
0%
Percentual sem resPosta 1.3%
MOTIVATION TO START USING
THE BIKE AS AN URBAN
TRANSPORTATION MODE
MOTIVATION FOR
CONTINUE CYCLING
MOTIVATION TO
CYCLING MORE
MAIN
DESTINATIONS
EVERYDAY
PROBLEMS
poRT0
AlegRe
POPULATION: 1.4 MILLIONS OF INHABITANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
4
4.5%
+
96A
COST
14
14.3%
+
86A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
45
45.1%
+
55A
HEALTH CONCERN24
24.6%
+
76A
OTHERS11
11.2%
+
89A
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN2
2.2%
+
98A
COST20
20.1%
+
80A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
37
37.1%
+
63A
HEALTH CONCERN32
31.7%
+
68A
OTHERS8
8.5%
+
92A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.4%
Percentual sem resPosta 0.3%
BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE
47
46.9%
+
53A
PUBLIC SAFETY9
8.9%
+
91A
TRANSIT SAFETY29
29.5%
+
71A
BIKE PARKING6
5.8%
+
94A
4
3.6%
+
96A
TREE-LINED STREETS AND BIKE LANES5
4.9%
+
95A
OTHERS WORK86
85.8%
+
14A
SCHOOL / COLLEGE49
48.7%
+
51A
SHOPPING79
78.8%
+
21A
LEISURE94
93.8%
+
6A
LACK OF CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE27+73A
27.2%
PUBLIC SAFETY5
4.9%
+
95A
TRANSIT SAFETY28
28.1%
+
72A
EDUCATION IN THE TRANSIT33
33.5%
+
67A
SIGNALING2
1.8%
+
98A
OTHERS4
4%
+
96A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.5%
MOTIVATION TO START USING
THE BIKE AS AN URBAN
TRANSPORTATION MODE
MOTIVATION FOR
CONTINUE CYCLING
MOTIVATION TO
CYCLING MORE
MAIN
DESTINATIONS
EVERYDAY
PROBLEMS
ReCIfe
POPULATION: 1.4 MILLIONS OF INHABITANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
2
2.4%
+
98A
COST
17
16.7%
+
83A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
53
53%
+
47A
HEALTH CONCERN22
21.9%
+
78A
OTHERS5
5.2%
+
95A
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN4
4%
+
96A
COST17
16.7%
+
83A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
51
51.4%
+
49A
HEALTH CONCERN20
20.3%
+
80A
OTHERS7
7.2%
+
93A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.4%
Percentual sem resPosta 0.8%
BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE
45
45%
+
55A
PUBLIC SAFETY8
8%
+
92A
TRANSIT SAFETY31
31.5%
+
69A
BIKE PARKING2
1.6%
+
98A
TREE-LINED STREETS AND BIKE LANES13
12.7%
+
87A
OTHERS1
0.8%
+
99A
WORK96
95.8%
+
4A
SCHOOL / COLLEGE26
26%
+
74A
SHOPPING67
66.8%
+
33A
LEISURE73
73%
+
27A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.4%
Percentual sem resPosta 0.4%
LACK OF CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE
26+74A
26.3%
PUBLIC SAFETY3
2.8%
+
97A
TRANSIT SAFETY17
17.5%
+
83A
EDUCATION IN THE TRANSIT53
52.6%
+
47A
SIGNALING1
0.4%
+
99A
OTHERS0
+
100A
0%
MOTIVATION TO START USING
THE BIKE AS AN URBAN
TRANSPORTATION MODE
MOTIVATION FOR
CONTINUE CYCLING
MOTIVATION TO
CYCLING MORE
MAIN
DESTINATIONS
EVERYDAY
PROBLEMS
RIo de
JANeIRo
POPULATION: 6.4 MILLIONS OF INHABITANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
2
2.1%
+
98A
COST
18
18.1%
+
82A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
52
52
+
48A
HEALTH CONCERN17
16.8%
+
83A
OTHERS10
10.2%
+
90A
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN2
1.7%
+
98A
COST20
20.5%
+
80A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
38
38.2%
+
62A
HEALTH CONCERN19
18.6%
+
81A
OTHERS20
20.5%
+
80A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.5%
Percentual sem resPosta 0.8%
BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE
57
57.2%
+
43A
PUBLIC SAFETY13
13.3%
+
87A
TRANSIT SAFETY15
14.8%
+
85A
BIKE PARKING6
6.3%
+
94A
TREE-LINED STREETS AND BIKE LANES5
5.4%
+
95A
OTHERS2
2.5%
+
98A
WORK84
81.8%
+
16A
SCHOOL / COLLEGE24
23.9%
+
76A
SHOPPING60
60.1%
+
40A
LEISURE70
70.3%
+
30A
LACK OF CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE29+71A
28.8%
PUBLIC SAFETY10
10.5%
+
90A
TRANSIT SAFETY26
25.6%
+
74A
EDUCATION IN THE TRANSIT27
26.8%
+
73A
SIGNALING3
3.3%
+
97A
OTHERS4
3.9%
+
96A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.5% Percentual sem resPosta 1.1%
MOTIVATION TO START USING
THE BIKE AS AN URBAN
TRANSPORTATION MODE
MOTIVATION FOR
CONTINUE CYCLING
MOTIVATION TO
CYCLING MORE
MAIN
DESTINATIONS
EVERYDAY
PROBLEMS
SAlvAdoR
POPULATION: 2.9 MILLIONS OF INHABITANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
6
6.2%
+
94A
COST
16
16%
+
84A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
37
37.3
+
63A
HEALTH CONCERN37
37.3
+
63A
OTHERS3
2.7%
+
97A
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN5
4.7%
+
95A
COST18
18.4%
+
82A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
38
37.7%
+
62A
HEALTH CONCERN35
34.6%
+
65A
OTHERS4
3.8%
+
96A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.8%
Percentual sem resPosta 0.5%
BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE
55
54.8%
+
45A
PUBLIC SAFETY10
9.8%
+
90A
TRANSIT SAFETY19
18.6%
+
81A
BIKE PARKING4
3.8%
+
96A
TREE-LINED STREETS AND BIKE LANES9
9.1%
+
91A
OTHERS3
3.5%
+
97A
WORK84
84.5%
+
16A
SCHOOL / COLLEGE23
23.2%
+
77A
SHOPPING67
67%
+
33A
LEISURE81
81.2%
+
19A
LACK OF CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE32+68A
32.4%
PUBLIC SAFETY5
5.1%
+
95A
TRANSIT SAFETY13
13.3%
+
87A
EDUCATION IN THE TRANSIT44
43.9%
+
56A
SIGNALING4
4.2%
+
96A
OTHERS1
0.7%
+
99A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.4%
MOTIVATION TO START USING
THE BIKE AS AN URBAN
TRANSPORTATION MODE
MOTIVATION FOR
CONTINUE CYCLING
MOTIVATION TO
CYCLING MORE
MAIN
DESTINATIONS
EVERYDAY
PROBLEMS
SÃo pAulo
POPULATION: 11.8 MILLIONS OF INHABITANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
3
2.7%
+
97A
COST
17
16.6%
+
83A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
43
43.4
+
57A
HEALTH CONCERN27
27.5
+
73A
OTHERS9
9.2%
+
91A
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN1
1.3%
+
99A
COST18
17.9
+
82A
SPEED AND FAST CONNECTIVITY
48
47.6%
+
52A
HEALTH CONCERN23
22.8%
+
77A
OTHERS10
9.9%
+
90A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.5%
Percentual sem resPosta 0.6%
BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE
49
49.4%
+
51A
PUBLIC SAFETY14
13.8%
+
86A
TRANSIT SAFETY17
17.5%
+
83A
BIKE PARKING7
7.3
+
93A
TREE-LINED STREETS AND BIKE LANES1
1.2%
+
99A
OTHERS10
10.4%
+
90A
WORK91
91%
+
9A
SCHOOL / COLLEGE24
23.9%
+
76A
SHOPPING44
44.2%
+
56A
LEISURE74
73.9%
+
26A
LACK OF CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE24+76A
24.1%
PUBLIC SAFETY7
7.2%
+
93A
TRANSIT SAFETY19
19.5%
+
81A
EDUCATION IN THE TRANSIT37
36.8%
+
63A
SIGNALING4
3.9%
+
96A
OTHERS8
7.9%
+
92A
Percentual sem resPosta 0.6%
OVERALL COORDINATION
Zé LoboASSISTANTS
GabrieLa binatti / GLauston Ferreira
TECHNICAL STAFF
GRAPHIC DESIGN
CubíCuLoOBSERVATÓRIO DAS METRÓPOLES
/ LABORATÓRIO DE MOBILIDADE
SUSTENTáVEL – PROURB-UFRJ
FiLipe Marino / JuCiano rodriGues Laurine séZérat / ViCtor andrade
CICLO URBANO
ARACAJUCOORDINATION: José WaLdson Costa de andrade
STAFF: andreW JunGkunt
LuCiano aranha / nyCoLLy Maria dos santos siLVa / sayuri siLVa dantas de oLiVeira / thiaGo reis dos santos
BH EM CICLO
BELO HORIZONTECOORDINATION: CarLos edWard CaMpos STAFF: CirLeia sainZ / eLis reGina Martins souZa / GuiLherMe Medeiros / irene beneVides dutra Murta / Jhonathan MarCeL de oLiVeira / keiLa desLandes / LuiZa taVares siqueira Mariana MiCoLi barquete / MoaCyr aníCio Viana FiLho / raMon brant
RODAS DA PAZ
BRASÍLIA COORDINATION: Jonas bertuCCiSTAFF: Fábio iGLesias / renata FLorentino isaque siMoni / karLa GaMba / LuCas de souZa / Mateus baruCi / rauL araGão yuri prestes
PEDALA MANAUS
MANAUS COORDINATION: CLaudia VaLente STAFF: CaroLa sChuLZ / danieLe braZ israeL FéLix / Luana deMosthenes pauLo aGuiar / prisCiLa santiaGo raiMundo neto / raqueL Cardoso sueLen MariaMOBILIDADE NITERÓI
NITERÓI COORDINATION: ana LuiZa Carboni STAFF: aLine steFanie / eLisa siLVa de souZa / isabeLa Ledo / Matheus LiMa da Costa / raiLane borGes / raViny oLiVeira da siLVa / renato da horta LiMa / rodriGo rosa / serGio FranCo / thayana santana da ConCeição / tuiZa teóFiLo Fernandes / ViViane da siLVa MartinsMOBICIDADE
PORTO ALEGRE COORDINATION: tássia Furtado STAFF: andré GoMides / auGusto benneMann / Cadu CarVaLhodanie siLVa / FeLipe proLo / isa Janaísa LíVia arauJo / rodriGo GranJa
AMECICLO
RECIFECOORDINATION: rudiney barbosa
STAFF: aLdenio F. aLVes / CLáudia renata G. hoLder / Cristiane Crespo
Jason torres / LíGia LiMa / MárCio CabraL de Moura / rodriGo nibberinG rosaLia VasConCeLos
TRANSPORTE ATIVO
RIO DE JANEIRO COORDINATION: Zé LoboSTAFF: arLindo pereira / CaroLina queiroZ / dandarah Jordão / LuiZ FeLipe aVeLar / MiCheLLe CastiLho
MôniCa bentes / riCardo Martins
BIKE ANJO SALVADOR
SALVADOR COORDINATION: danieL baGdeVeSTAFF: ed Ferreira / Fernanda passos GiLMar pereira / MarCeLLa MarConi MarCia Meneses / Mário CarVaLho prisCiLa batistão
CICLOCIDADE
SÃO PAULO COORDINATION: danieL Guthana CaroLina nunes / Maíra boMbaChini STAFF: aLex abrahão / aLexandre GreGório / bruno pinheiro FLaVio soares / huGo CruZ JuLiana pinheiro / Marina barrio Marina harkot / Matheus paiVa steLLa rosati / WesLey estêVão
STAFF ITAú
CiCero arauJo / GabrieLa GoMes aLMeida LuCiana niCoLa / Maira Moreno MaChado siMone GaLLo
CREATION AND CONCEPT
DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH COORDINATION
laboratório de mobilidade sustentável
