• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Agronomic performance of soybean cultivars in an agroforestry system

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "Agronomic performance of soybean cultivars in an agroforestry system"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texto

Loading

Imagem

Figure 1. Rainfall (mm) and maximum, average and minimum air  temperatures (ºC), during the soybean development in  the 2014/2015 (a) and 2015/2016 (b) growing seasons,  in Londrina, Paraná state, Brazil.
Figure 2. Positions of the soybean subplots between the rows of Eucalyptus grandis.
Table 2. Number of pods per plant, grains per pod and 1,000-grain  mass for soybean cultivars (average of five positions  between the rows of Eucalyptus grandis), in the  2014/2015 and 2015/2016 growing seasons
Table 3. Soybean grain yield (kg ha -1 ) for cultivars and positions between tree rows of Eucalyptus grandis, in the 2014/2015 and  2015/2016 growing seasons.
+2

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Os resultados principais relativos à EIC são: 1) há um maior investimento na subescala de cuidado corporal e um menor investimento na subescala de bem-estar no contacto

In an earlier work 关16兴, restricted to the zero surface tension limit, and which completely ignored the effects of viscous and magnetic stresses, we have found theoretical

A infestação da praga foi medida mediante a contagem de castanhas com orificio de saída do adulto, aberto pela larva no final do seu desenvolvimento, na parte distal da castanha,

To determine the water use efficiency, the relationship between the production (weight) of fruits obtained in kilograms during the entire cycle in both the open and the

The last argumentative line configures the major objective of the present research work: to put together a new perspective on the second academic revolution that explores the

In processing functional soybean foods, hydrothermal treatments of the soybean grains, as well as high isoflavone content soybean cultivars will enhance development of

The stress caused by the flooding on soybean plants, resulted in differences in protein content on the grains of cultivars ‘BRS 257’ and ‘BRS 213’ in the R4 stage..

According to Pimentel-Gomes & Garcia (2002), the yield components, regarding the number of soybean grains per pod and mass of 100 grains, indicated a low variability,