jcoloproctol(rioj).2015;35(1):59–62
w w w . j c o l . o r g . b r
Journal
of
Coloproctology
Case
Report
Appendicitis
caused
by
ingestion
of
metal
foreign
body
José
Inácio
de
Almeida
Neto
a,∗,
Bruna
Schawn
Guerini
b,
Felipe
Fernandes
Nogueira
de
Almeida
baGeneralSurgeryService,HospitaldeClínicasDr.RadamésNardini,Mauá,SP,Brazil bHospitaldeClínicasDr.RadamésNardini,Mauá,SP,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received13December2013 Accepted11August2014 Availableonline28January2015
Keywords:
Appendicitis
Foreign-bodymigration Appendix
Laparotomy
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Introduction:Theingestionofforeignbodiesisafrequentoccurrence,especiallyamong chil-dren.Themajorityoftheseobjectstravelsafelythroughthegastrointestinaltract,without causingsymptomsorleavingsequelae.Acuteappendicitisistheemergencysurgical pathol-ogyofgreaterprevalence.However,theimpactionofaforeignbodyintotheappendicular lumenasanetiologicagentofappendicitisisaveryrareevent.
Casereport:Wedescribethecaseofa21-year-oldmalepatientwithlowerabdominalpain overapproximatelysixdays,inassociationwithvomiting,feverandabdominaldistension. Afterimagingstudies,aradiopaqueforeignbodywasidentifiedinapelvictopography,with distentionandair-fluidlevelsinintestinalloops.Ourpatientwassubmittedtoanopen appendectomy,evidencingacuteperforatedappendicitisandthepresenceoftwoforeign bodiesinitslumen.Thepatientprogressedsatisfactorilyinthepost-operativeperiod,with useofbroad-spectrumantibiotics.
Discussion: Foreignbodiesimpactedinthegastrointestinal tractareusuallyremovedby endoscopictechniques.Whenthesebodiescauseinfections,thereshouldbearesolution, preferablybysurgicallaparoscopy,whichwillservebothfordiagnosticastherapeutic pur-poses.
©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeColoproctologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.All rightsreserved.
Apendicite
provocada
por
ingesta
de
corpos
estranhos
metálicos
Palavras-chave:
Apendicite
Corpoestranho,migrac¸ão Apêndice
Laparotomia
r
e
s
u
m
o
Introduc¸ão: Aingestadecorposestranhoséumacontecimentofrequente,principalmente entrecrianc¸as.Amaioriadestespassadeformainócuapelo tratogastrointestinal,sem causarsintomasoudeixarsequelas.Apendiciteagudaéapatologiacirúrgicaemergencial demaiorprevalência.
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:jialmeidacirplast@gmail.com(J.I.deAlmeidaNeto). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcol.2014.08.014
60
jcoloproctol(rioj).2015;35(1):59–62Contudo:aimpactac¸ãodeumcorpoestranhonolúmenapendicularcomoagenteetiológico deapendiciteéumeventomuitoraro.
Relatodecaso:Descrevemosocasodeumpacientemasculinode21anoscomquadrodedor abdominalbaixaháaproximadamente6dias,associando-seavômitos,febreedistensão abdominal.Apósexamesdeimagem,identificou-secorpoestranhoradiopacoemtopografia pélvica,distensãoeníveishidroaéreosemalc¸asintestinais.Foisubmetidoa apendicecto-mialaparotômica,evidenciando-seapendiciteagudaperfuradaepresenc¸adedoiscorpos estranhosemseulúmen.Evoluiudeformasatisfatórianopós-operatório,tendo-sefeito usodeantibióticosdelargoespectro.
Discussão: Corposestranhosimpactadosnotratogastrointestinalsãousualmenteretirados portécnicasendoscópicas.Quandoprovocamquadrosinfecciosos,deve-seprocederauma resoluc¸ãocirúrgica,preferencialmenteporvideolaparoscopia,aqualservirátantoparafins diagnósticosquantoterapêuticos.
©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeColoproctologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda. Todososdireitosreservados.
Introduction
Appendectomyisthemostcommonemergencysurgical pro-cedure worldwide.1 However, these procedures remove up
to28.7% ofnormalappendices,evenwith theevolution of diagnosticmethods.Thispercentageisevenhigherinyoung women.1,2
Theingestionofinedibleandindigestibleobjectsisvery common,especially in younger age groups. In adults, this occursaccidentally,orinpatientswithmentalretardation.3
Thepresenceofaforeignbodyintheappendix,actingasa causeofaninflammatoryprocess,isaveryrareevent.4
Wedescribeacaseofacuteappendicitiscausedby inges-tionofametalobject,whichimpactedintotheappendiceal lumen, comparing the conduct taken witha reviewofthe existingliteratureonthesubject.
Case
report
Amale patient, 21 years old,was admittedto the general surgeryemergencydepartment witha24-h non-irradiating abdominalpainontherightiliacfossa(RIF),without aggra-vatingor mitigatingfactors, and associated with vomiting episodes.Thepatienthadnoothercomplaintsrelatedtothe gastrointestinaltractandwithnohistoryofcommorbidities, surgeryorallergies.Thephysicalexaminationrevealedpain onpalpationofRIF,butwithoutsignsofperitonealirritation; air-fluidsoundspresent,withnopalpablemasses.Thepatient hadmildleukocytosis(12,600leukocytes),withoutpresenceof rods.Anabdominalultrasoundwasperformed,which identi-fiedtwometallicforeignbodieslocatedinthepelvisorright iliacfossa.
A CT scan of the pelvis confirmed the presence of radiopaquebodies;wecouldnotdeterminewhethertheywere locatedintheinteriorofthegastrointestinaltractorinthe abdominalcavity(Fig.1).Thepatienthadhispainsymptoms improved,withnormalbowelmovementsduringthefirst48h afteradmission,whenfledthehospitalafter72h.
Fig.1–Computedtomography.
Thepatient returnedwithworsening ofpainsymptoms after48hofevasion,nowwiththeadditionofbowel bloat-ingandmultipleemeticepisodes,withperitonealirritationon physicalexamination.Anewradiographyrevealedagainthe pelvicforeign bodies,plusair-fluidlevelsinsmallintestine topography(Fig.2).
Surgery wasindicatedand performedbyan exploratory laparotomy,whenanacuteappendicitiswasidentified,with necrosisandperforationofthevermiformappendixand pres-enceoftwometalbodiesintoitslumen(Figs.3and4);Thus, aconventionalappendectomywasperformed.
jcoloproctol(rioj).2015;35(1):59–62
61
Fig.2– Radiographyoftheabdomen.
Fig.3–Vermiformappendix.
Fig.4–Appendixandforeignbodies.
wasdischargedonthe5thpostoperativeday,withacceptance ofageneraldietandwithnormalbowelhabits.
Discussion
Theingestionofforeign bodiesisacommon phenomenon inclinicalpractice,especiallyamongchildrenandinadults withmentalretardation;2inmostcases,thesearefragments
offishorpoultrybone,dentalprosthesesorleadfragments (present in slaughtered poultry products).In general, their passagethroughthegastrointestinaltractisasymptomatic,5
andthepresenceofcomplicationssuchasintestinal perfora-tion,abscessorbowelobstructionbeingarareevent.3,6The
impactionofforeign bodiesinto theappendixisan excep-tionalevent;acuteappendicitiscausedbyaforeignbodyhas aprevalenceof0.0005%,2,5andthelatencytimebetweenthe
ingestion of the foreign body and the onset of symptoms couldbemeasuredinyears.7Inourcase,thepatientdoesnot
62
jcoloproctol(rioj).2015;35(1):59–62Thereisstillcontroversyabouttheactiontobetakenafter theingestionofanasymptomaticforeignbody.Klingeretal. proposetheendoscopicremovalofallforeignbodiesbyupper gastrointestinalendoscopy;ifthisprocedureisnotavailable, thecaseshouldbeaccompaniedwithserialradiographsand leucograms.8
Colonoscopyshouldbeusedtoremovestationaryobjects inthelowerrightquadrantoftheabdomenforaperiodofat least72h,eveniftheseobjectsareasymptomatic.8,9
In fact, thin and pointed impacted objects show a greaterpropensitytocausesymptoms,around93%ofcases; abscesses(88%)orintestinalperforation(70%)are themost commonfindings.Ontheotherhand,bluntobjects maybe asymptomaticforlongperiods,andanincidenceofupto66% ofappendicitisinthecaseofimpactionofsuchobjectswas reported.3
If the endoscopic removal failed, a fluoroscopy-guided laparoscopytoremovetheseforeignbodiesisindicated.2
Thepositioningofthe appendix inamorecaudal loca-tionthantheusualmaybeduetotheweightcausedbythe presenceofbothforeignbodiesintothelumen;inaway,this complicatestheexactlocationoftheseobjects.
Inthe casein study,the endoscopicprocedure was not attempted,sincetherewas asurgicalindicationduetothe inflammationcausedbytheforeignbodies.Failuretouse a laparoscopicprocedurewasduetotheunavailabilityofthis procedureintheperiodwhenthepatientwasseen.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1.ChandrasegaramMD,RothwellLA,AnEI,MillerRJ.Pathologies oftheappendix:a10-yearreviewof4670appendicectomy specimens.ANZJSurg.2012;82:844–7.
2.KlinglerPJ,SeeligMH,DeVaultKR,WetscherGJ,FlochNR, BrantonSA,etal.Ingestedforeignbodieswithintheappendix: a100-yearreviewoftheliterature.DigDis.1998;16:308–14. 3.BenizriEI,CohenC,BerederJM,RahiliA,BenchimolD.
Swallowingasafetypin:reportofacase.WorldJGastrointest Surg.2012;4:20–2.
4.BaekSK,BaeOS,HwangI.Perforatedappendicitiscausedby foreignbodyingestion.SurgLaparoscEndoscPercutanTech. 2012;22:e94–7.
5.SarS,MahawarKK,MarshR,SmallPK.Recurrentappendicitis followingsuccessfulconservativemanagementofan appendicularmassinassociationwithaforeignbody:acase report.CasesJ.2009;2:7776.
6.PilichosC,TasiasG,PylerisE,AnyfantisN,PantelarosN, BarbatzasC.Endoscopicextractionofametalkeyimpacted withintheappendix.WorldJGastrointestEndosc.2010;2: 372–4.
7.SelfaMunozA,PalaciosPerezA,MartinezTiradoP,Barrientos DelgadoA.Anunusualcauseofacuteappendicitis.MedClin. 2012;138:e15.
8.SarkarRR,BishtJ,SinhaRoySK.Ingestedmetallicforeignbody lodgedintheappendix.JIndianAssocPediatrSurg.
2011;16:29–30.