SHORT
COMMUNICATION/COURTE
COMMUNICATION
Susceptibility
to
caspofungin
of
Candida
spp.
strains
isolated
in
Ceará,
Northeastern
Brazil
Sensibilite
´ a
` la
caspofungine
de
souches
de
Candida
sp.
isole
´ es
en
Ceara
´,
Nord-est
Bre
´ silien
C.
Rocha
da
Silva
a,b,
R.
de
Sousa
Campos
a,b,
M.
Adalgiza
dos
Santos
Neta
a,b,
M.
Rozellê
Ferreira
Ângelo
c,
H.
Iury
Ferreira
Magalhães
a,d,
B.
Coêlho
Cavalcanti
d,
M.
Odorico
de
Moraes
d,
D.
Silveira
Macedo
d,
H.
Vitoriano
Nobre
Júnior
a,b,d,*
aDepartmentofClinicalandToxicologicalAnalysis,SchoolofPharmacy,LaboratoryofBioprospectionand
ExperimentsinYeast(LABEL),FederalUniversityofCeara´,Fortaleza,CE,Brazil
bDepartmentofPathologyandLegalMedicine,SchoolofMedicine,SpecializedMedical,MycologyCenter,
FederalUniversityofCeara´,Fortaleza,CE,Brazil
cCentralPublicHealthLaboratory(LACEN-CE),Fortaleza,CE,Brazil
dDepartmentofPhysiologyandPharmacology,FederalUniversityofCeara´,Fortaleza,CE,Brazil
Received1August2011;receivedinrevisedform15September2011;accepted23September2011 Availableonline9November2011
KEYWORDS Caspofungin;
Candidaspp.; Microdilution; Susceptibilitytests
Summary Caspofungin isan echinocandinprescribedforthetreatment ofinvasivefungal infectionscausedbyCandidaspp.andAspergillusspp.Theaimofthisstudyistoassessthe degreeofsusceptibilityofCandida spp., isolatedfromblood culturesin thestateofCeará (Brazil)tocaspofunginbythebrothmicrodilutionmethod.Thirty-threestrainsofCandidaspp. wereselectedforthetest(sevenC.albicans,nineC.tropicalisand17C.parapsilosis);these strainsarethemostcommonlyisolatesoffungalinfectionsinCeará.Theresultsofsusceptibility testsbybrothmicrodilutioncanbereadat24or48hoursaftertesting,withoutcompromising testinterpretations.C.parapsilosisexhibitedthehighestMICswhencomparedwiththeMICsof caspofunginagainstC.albicansandC.tropicalis.
#2011ElsevierMassonSAS.Allrightsreserved.
MOTSCLÉS Caspofungine;
Candidasp.;
Résumé Lacaspofungineestuneéchinocandineprescritepourletraitementdesinfections fongiquesinvasivescauséesparCandidasp.etAspergillussp.Lebutdecetteétudeestd’évaluer ledegrédesensibilitéàlacaspofunginedeCandidasp.,isoléàpartird’hémoculturesdansl’état duCeará(Brésil)parlaméthodedemicrodilution.Trente-troissouchesdeCandidasp.ontété
JournaldeMycologieMédicale(2011)21,273—276
* Correspondingauthor.CapitãoFranciscoPedro,1210,CEP-60.420-970RodolfoTeófilo,Brazil. E-mailaddress:helioufc@yahoo.com.br(H.VitorianoNobreJúnior).
Availableonlineat
www.sciencedirect.com
Microdilution; Testsdesensibilité
sélectionnéespourletest(septC.albicans,neufC.tropicaliset17C.parapsilosis);cessouches sontleplussouventisoléesdansdesinfectionsfongiquesenCeará.Lesrésultatsdestestsde sensibilitéparmicrodilutionpeuventêtrelusà24ou48heuresaprèslestests,sans compro-mettrelesinterprétationsdutest.C.parapsilosismontrelesCMIlesplusélevées comparative-mentàcellesdeC.albicansetC.tropicalispourlacaspofungine.
#2011ElsevierMassonSAS.Tousdroitsréservés.
Introduction
Candidaalbicansisthespeciesmostcommonlyisolatedfrom patients with invasive fungal infections (IFIs); however,
C.tropicalisandC.parapsilosisare increasinglyprevalent andaretheprincipalspeciesisolatedinBrazil[8,14,22,16]. Echinocandins are the newest class of antifungal drugs approvedbytheFoodandDrugAdministration(FDA)forthe treatment of systemicfungal infections. Thiswas the first classofantifungalagentstoexhibitactiononthecellwall,by inhibitingtheenzyme(1,3)beta-glucansynthase. Echinocan-dinsexhibitalimitedspectrumofactioncomparedtoazoles. However, they are excellent agents for the treatment of candidiasis.Theprimaryconstituentsofthisgroupare: cas-pofungin,micafunginandanidulafungin[11,3,5,9,18,12].
Thereisnoinvitrosusceptibilitytestingwith echinocan-dins against Candida spp. isolated from blood cultures in Ceará.Theaimofthisstudyistoevaluatethesusceptibility of strains of C. albicans, C.tropicalis and C. parapsilosis
againstcaspofunginbythebrothmicrodilutionmethod,and tocomparetheeffectivenessof caspofunginagainstthese strains.
Materials
and
methods
Isolationandidentificationoffungalstrains
Weused33strainsofCandidaspp.(sevenC.albicans,nine
C.tropicalisand17C.parapsilosis),thestrainswereisolated frombloodcultures,between2009and2010,andarepartof theCollectionofYeastsoftheLaboratoryofBioprospection andExperiments inYeast (LABEL), Departmentof Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, College of Pharmacy, Federal UniversityofCeará.The strainswereinoculatedonpotato agar(HimediaMumbai,India)andincubatedat378C/24h. They were then plated on CHROMagar Candida (Himedia Mumbai,India)toassesspurity.Identificationwasdoneby micromorphologyonriceagarTween80,germtube produc-tion,fermentationandassimilationofcarbohydrates,aswell asmoleculartests[7,2].
Susceptibilitytesting
Caspofungin(Sigma,StLouis,MO)waspreparedinwater,and dilutedinRPMI1640medium(Sigma,St.Louis,MO)buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165M MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid)buffer(Sigma).Themicrodilutiontestingwasperformed inaccordancewiththeguidelinesinCLSIdocumentM27-A3 (CLSI2008).MICsweredeterminedvisually,after24hand48h ofincubation,asthelowestconcentrationinmicrogramper millilitreofdrugthatcausedasignificantdiminutionof50%
and90% inhibition of growth belowcontrol levels.Quality controlwas performedbystrainsC. kruseiATCC6258and
C.parapsilosisATCC22019.
Results
and
discussion
Treatmentofsystemicmycosesisoneoftheforemost pro-blemsinthefieldofmedicalmycology;theseinfectionsaffect patientswithpredisposingfactors.Suchpathologiesare diffi-culttodetectandthedelayindiagnosingthemisthereason forhighmortality.Theantifungalagentsavailabletodayoften showsecondaryandsideeffectsbecausetheir therapeutic margin is narrow, which limits usage of such agents[20]. Testing for susceptibility to antifungal agentshas become veryimportantduetotheemergenceoffungiexhibitingsome degreeofresistancetodrugscommonlyusedinclinical med-icine[23,21].InnortheasternBrazil,thereareveryfewstudies thatassesstheincidenceoffungalinfectionsandtheprofileof drugsusceptibility.Whatweobservedinclinicalpractice,ona culturalbasis,wastheprescriptionofantifungaldrugswithout priorsusceptibilitytesting.Thereisanoveralllackoftrained professionalsandreferencelaboratories withqualifiedand knowledgeablepersonnel,and mostimportantly, a lack of integration between laboratories andhospitals. Echinocan-dinsareattractivetherapeuticoptionsforthetreatmentof IFIs. Althoughthese agents have a narrow spectrum, they coverthetwomostcommonIFIs,candidiasisandaspergillosis
[3].Echinocandinsexhibitfewinteractionswithotherdrugs, lowtoxicity,andare broadlyactive againstazole-resistant
Candidaspp.[5].Table1showsthegeometricmean(GM)of MICs50%and90%at24and48hoursofcaspofunginagainst
C.albicans,C.parapsilosisandC.tropicalis.Froma micro-biologicalviewpoint,weseethattheGMofthe50%and90% MICs at 24 and48hours of C. parapsilosisis higher when comparedtotheGMofthe50%and90%MICsat24and48hours ofC.albicansandC.tropicalis;thisdifferencewas statisti-callysignificantwithP<0.05,24and48hoursofcaspofungin vis-a-visC.albicans,C.parapsilosisandC.tropicalis. Epide-miological studiesconducted in different regions of Latin America,includingBrazil,haveindicatedthatC.albicansis themostcommonlyisolatedspecies,followedbyC.tropicalis
andC.parapsilosis[22].C.parapsilosisisoneoftheforemost causesofinvasivecandidiasis[14].Inourstudy,itwasthe principalstrainisolated(17strains)(Table1).Treatmentof IFIsrequiresanunderstandingoftheepidemiologyofspecific infections.Echinocandinsrepresentoneofthemainstaysin thetreatmentagainstcandidiasis,andshouldbemonitoredby identifyingthemostfrequentspecies,aswellasthe suscept-ibilityofsuchspeciestodrugsusedpreviously[5].Inourstudy, theGMoftheMICsofC.parapsilosiscomparedtoC.albicans
and C. tropicalis was higher, showing that C. parapsilosis
exhibitshigherMICsforcaspofungin;similarobservationshave beendescribedintheliterature[9,18,1,4,19].
ThePearsoncoefficient(R)wasusedtoassessthe corre-lationofthelaboratoryresultsat24and48hours.Onecan seeastrongcorrelationbetweentheresultsreadafterthese periodsoftime,suggestingthatthereisnodifferenceinthe release of results at 24 or 48hours aftertesting, thereby speedingupnotonlydiagnosis,butalsoestablishmentofthe appropriate therapy. This coefficient is a measure of the degreeoflinearrelationshipbetweentwoquantitative vari-ables,usedinseveralstudiestocorrelatelaboratory proce-duresandtimeofoperationalization[6,13,17].
Prescribingcaspofunginwithoutpriorsusceptibility test-ingmaycompromisethetreatmentofinfectionscausedby
C.parapsilosis,whichinourstudyandinotherstudieshave been shown to be less susceptible to caspofungin
[9,18,1,4,19]. The union between susceptibility testing andprior identificationof thecausative agentis essential forestablishingthecorrecttreatment.TheGMofthehigh MICsfoundinthestrainsofC.parapsilosiscanbeexplained by the presence of the mutation on thefks genealready reportedinotherstudies.C.parapsilosis,Candida metapsi-losis,and Candida orthopsilosis,which harbor a naturally occurringaminoacidsubstitutionintheequivalentposition ofFks1p.[10,15].Futurestudiesarerequiredtoevaluatethis mutationandtheMICsfound.
Disclosure
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhavenoconflictsofinterest concerningthisarticle.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported byConselho Nacional de Desen-volvimentoCientíficoeTecnológico(CNPq),Coordenaçãode
AperfeiçoamentodePessoaldeNívelSuperior(CAPES)and FundaçãoCearensedeApoioaoDesenvolvimentoCientíficoe Tecnológico(FUNCAP).
References
[1]Andes D,DiekemaDJ, Pfaller MA,BohrmullerJ,MarchilloK, Lepak A. In vivocomparisonof thepharmacodynamic target among echinocandin drugs and Candida species. Antimicrob AgentsChemother2010;54:2497—506.
[2]AzevedoAC,BizerraFC,MattaDA,AlmeidaLP,RosasR,Colombo AL.InvitrosusceptibilityofalargecollectionofCandidastrains against fluconazole and voriconazole by using the CLSI disk diffusionassay.Mycopathologia2011;171:411—6.
[3]Bal AM.Theechinocandins: threeusefulchoicesorthreetoo many?IntJAntimicrobAgents2010;35:13—8.
[4] CantónE,Espinel-IngroffA,PemánJ,delCastilloL.Invitro fungicidalactivitiesofechinocandinsagainstCandida metap-silosis,C.orthopsilosis,andC.parapsilosisevaluatedby time-killstudies.AntimicrobAgentsChemother2010;54: 2194—
7.
[5]ChenSCA,PlayfordEG,SorrellTC.Antifungaltherapyininvasive fungalinfections.CurrOpinPharm2010;10:522—30.
[6]Clinical and Laboratory StandardsInstitute - CLSI.Reference method forbroth dilutionantifungal susceptibilitytestingof yeasts:informationalsupplement,M27-A3.Clinicaland Labora-toryStandardsInstitute,Wayne,PA;2008.
[7]ColomboAL,NucciM,ParkBJ,etal.Epidemiologyofcandidemia in Brazil:a nationwide sentinelsurveillanceof candidemia in elevenmedicalcenters.JClinMicrobiol2006;44:2816—23. [8]Colombo AL,Bourque M, Ngai AL,et al. Caspofungin usein
patientswithinvasivecandidiasiscausedbycommon non-albi-cans Candida species: review of the Caspofungin database. AntimicrobAgentsChemother2010;54:1864—71.
[9]DenningDW,HopeWW.Therapyforfungaldiseases: opportu-nitiesandpriorities.TrendsMicrobiol2010;18:195—204. [10] Garcia-EffronG, KatiyarSK,ParkS,EdlindTD,Perlin DS.A
naturally occurring proline-to-alanine amino acid change infks1p inCandida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, and Table1 InvitroactivityofcaspofunginagainstCandidaspp.
Activite´ invitrodelacaspofunginecontreCandidasp.
Species(n8ofisolates) Time CaspofunginMICa Pvalue
GM Rb
50% 90% Range 24h 48h
C.albicans(7) 24 0.06 0.07 0.06—0.12 1 0.7 0.03c
48 0.06 0.07 0.06—0.12
C.tropicalis(9) 24 0.06 0.06 0.06 1 1 0.01d
48 0.06 0.06 0.06
C.parapsilosis(17) 24 0.07 0.09 0.06—0.25 0.5 0.5 48 0.10 0.17 0.06—0.50
Overall(33) 24 0.07 0.08 0.06—0.25 0.6 0.5 48 0.08 0.11 0.06—0.50
GM:geometricmean.
aMICsdeterminedbyfollowingtheprotocolintheCLSIM27-A3document. bPearson’scoefficient.
c ComparisonbetweensusceptibilityofC.parapsilosisandC.albicans. dComparisonbetweensusceptibilityofC.parapsilosisandC.tropicalis.
Candidametapsilosisaccountsforreducedechinocandin sus-ceptibility.AntimicrobAgentsChemother2008;52:2305—12. [11] HazenKC,DirksD,MasuokaJ.DeterminationofEchinocandin
MICsforCandidaspeciesinlessthan8hours:comparisonofthe rapidsusceptibilityassaywiththeclinicalandlaboratory Stan-dardsInstitute’s Broth MicrodilutionAssay. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:4043—8.
[12] LanternierF,Lortholary O.Caspofungin. JMycolMed2010; 20:190—3.
[13] MaindaCM,MiliciME,TrovatoL,etal.Evaluationofthedisk diffusionmethodcompared to the microdilution methodin susceptibilitytestingofanidulafunginagainstfilamentous fun-gi.JClinMicrobiol2008;46:4071—4.
[14] Miceli MH, Díaz JA, Lee SA. Emerging opportunistic yeast infections.LancetInfectDis2011;11:142—51.
[15] MirhendiH,BruunB,ChristensenJJ,SchonheyderHC,etal. Molecular screening for Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosisamongDanishCandidaparapsilosisgroupblood cultureisolates:proposalofanewRFLPprofilefor differentia-tion.JMedMicrobiol2010;59:414—20.
[16] MünozP,GuineaJ,RojasL,BouzaE.Newantifungalagentsfor the treatment of candidaemia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010;36S:S63—9.
[17] PfallerMA,DiekemaDJ,Ostrosky-ZeichnerL,etal.Correlation ofMICwithoutcomeforCandidaspeciestestedagainst
Cas-pofungin.Anidulafungin,andMicafungin:analysisandproposal for interpretive MIC breakpoints. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46: 2620—9.
[18] PfallerMA,CastanheiraM,DiekemaDJ,MesserSA,MoetGJ, JonesRN.ComparisonofEuropeanCommitteeon Antimicro-bialSusceptibilityTesting(EUCAST)andEtestMethodswith theCLSIBrothMicrodilutionMethodforEchinocandin suscep-tibilitytestingofCandidaspecies.JClinMicrobiol2010;48: 1592—9.
[19] PfallerMA,AndesD,DiekmaDJ,etal.Clinicalbreakpointsforthe echinocandinsandCandidarevisited:integrationofmolecular, clinical,andmicrobiologicaldatatoarriveatspecies-specific interpretivecriteria.DrugResistUpdat2011;14:164—76. [20] Ruiz-CampsI,Cuenca-EstrellaM.Antifúngicosparauso
sistê-mico.EnfermInfeccMicrobiolClin2009;27:353—62.
[21] SabraW,TawfikAF,ShiblAM.Evaluationofanewmethodfor antifungalsusceptibilitytestingforazoles.WorldJMicrobiol Biotechnol2010;26:451—7.
[22] San-Blas G, Burger E. Experimental medial mycological re-search in Latin America 2000—2009 overview. Rev Iberoam Micol2011;28:1—25.
[23] Silva AP, Miranda IM, Lisboa C, Pina-Vaz C, Rodrigues AG. Prevalence,distribution,andantifungalSusceptibilityprofiles ofCandidaparapsilosis,C.orthopsilosis,andC.metapsilosisin atertiarycarehospital.JClinMicrobiol2009;47:2392—7.