REVISTA
BRASILEIRA
DE
Entomologia
AJournalonInsectDiversityandEvolutionw w w . r b e n t o m o l o g i a . c o m
Systematics,
Morphology
and
Biogeography
Taxonomic
revision
of
Plyomydas
Wilcox
&
Papavero,
1971
with
the
description
of
two
new
species
and
its
transfer
to
Mydinae
(Insecta:
Diptera:
Mydidae)
Stephanie
Castillo
a,
Torsten
Dikow
b,∗aSanDiegoStateUniversity,DepartmentofBiology,SanDiego,UnitedStates
bNationalMuseumofNaturalHistory,SmithsonianInstitution,DepartmentofEntomology,Washington,UnitedStates
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:Received22December2016 Accepted9March2017 Availableonline24March2017 AssociateEditor:MarciaSoutoCouri Keywords: Mydasflies NeotropicalRegion Cybertaxonomy Openaccess
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
ThemonotypicNeotropicalMydidaegenusPlyomydasWilcox&Papavero,1971,todateconfinedto coastalPeru,isreviewed.Twonewspecies,Plyomydasadelphesp.nov.andPlyomydasphalarossp.nov.,are describedfrommid-elevationalwesternArgentina,whichextendsthedistributionofthegenus consid-erably.Distribution,occurrenceinbiodiversityhotspotssensuConservationInternational,andseasonal incidencearediscussed.Descriptions/re-descriptions,photographs,illustrations,andidentificationkeys areprovidedandmadeopenlyaccessibleindatadepositoriestosupportfuturestudiesoftheincluded taxa.PlyomydasistransferredfromtheLeptomydinaetotheMydinae:Messiasiinibasedontheabsence ofacanthophoritespinesonabdominaltergite10infemalesandthepresenceofveinM3+M4terminating inthecostalveinC.LeptomydinaeisthereforerestrictedtotheNorthernHemispherewiththeexception ofHessemydasKondratieff,Carr&Irwin,2005knownfromMadagascar.Messiasianotospila(Wiedemann, 1828)iscomparedtoPlyomydasspecies.
©2017PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.onbehalfofSociedadeBrasileiradeEntomologia.Thisisan openaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
).
Introduction
Mydidaefliesarea conspicuouspartoftheDipterafaunaof SouthAmerica.ThelargestknownMydidae,andpossiblyDiptera ingeneral,isGauromydasheros(Perty,1833)fromsouthernBrazil
(see Wilcox and Papavero, 1971; Calhau et al., 2015). Several
other species of this genus and species of Protomydas Wilcox, Papavero&Pimentel,1989arealsoverylarge,butrarelyobserved innature. Thediscoveryof relatively largespecimens of Mydi-daefromArgentinathatdonotfitthedescriptionofGauromydas Wilcox,Papavero&Pimentel,1989orProtomydasinseveralnatural historycollectionsinitiatedthepresentstudy.
Therearesome476Mydidaespeciesknownworld-wideand thelargestspeciesandgenericdiversityisfoundinsouthernAfrica
(Dikow,inpress).TheNeotropicalRegionhascurrentlysome85
speciesin 22generain sixsubfamilytaxa (Papavero,2009,see
alsoNeotropicaltaxoncatalogatasiloidfliesweb-site).Note that
theNeotropicalcatalogbyPapavero(2009)includesNearctictaxa ofEctyphinae,Leptomydinae,andRhaphiomidinae.
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:DikowT@si.edu(T.Dikow).
The Neotropical Leptomydinae include Plyomydas Wilcox & Papavero,1971,agenuswithasinglespeciesknownfromPeru, Nemomydas Curran, 1934 with eight central American species reachingasfarsouthasColombia,andpossiblyPseudonomoneura Bequaert,1961insouthernMexico.Ingeneral,Leptomydinaeis aNorthernHemispheretaxonwithonlyHessemydasKondratieff, Carr&Irwin,2005fromMadagascarandPlyomydasfromPeru pen-etratingtheSouthernHemisphere.
ThegenusPlyomydaswasdescribedfroma singlespecies, P. peruviensis Wilcox &Papavero, 1971, occurringin coastal Peru
(Wilcox and Papavero, 1971)and hasnot beenstudied further
since. New material of this genus hasbeen discovered in sev-eralnaturalhistorycollectionsthatextendthedistributionofthis taxontotheeasternAndesinwesternArgentinaaswellas low-elevationParaguay. These fliesare relativelylargewitha wing lengthbetween15and21mm,butareveryrarein entomologi-calcollectionsasonly16specimens(ofatotalof29Plyomydas) werelocated.Inthisreview,wepresentataxonomicrevisionof PlyomydaswiththedescriptionoftwonewspeciesfromArgentina andthetransferofthegenustotheMydinae.
AlmeidaandLamas(2014)recordPlyomydasfromArgentinafor
thefirsttimebymakingreferencetoanundescribedspeciesand provideakeytogeneraof MydidaeoccurringinArgentina.The
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2017.03.002
0085-5626/©2017PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.onbehalfofSociedadeBrasileiradeEntomologia.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
specimenshowninAlmeidaandLamas(2014,p.425)isPlyomydas phalarossp.nov.(MZSP-MZ003846).
Materialsandmethods
MorphologicalfeatureswereexaminedusinganOlympusSZ60 andaZeissSteREODiscovery.V12stereomicroscope.Winglength ismeasuredfromthetegulatothedistaltipofthewing.Thefemale andmaleterminaliawerefirstexcisedandmaceratedin10% potas-siumhydroxide(KOH)at55◦Cfollowedbyneutralizationinacetic acid(glacial,CH3COOH)andrinsingindistilledwater(H2O).They
weretemporarilystoredin75% ethanol(C2H5OH)for
examina-tionandillustrationand eventuallysealedinpolyethylenevials containing100%glycerine(C3H8O)andattachedtothespecimen’s
pin.
Terminology
TerminologyfollowsDikow(2009)and Cummingand Wood
(2009) (general morphology and abbreviations for setae),
Stuckenberg(1999)(antennae), and WoottonandEnnos(1989)
(wingvenation).Abdominaltergitesareabbreviatedinthe descrip-tionswith‘T’,andsternitesare abbreviatedwith‘S’. Theterms prothoracic,mesothoracic,andmetathoracicareabbreviated‘pro’, ‘mes’, and ‘met’, respectively. The term pubescence (adjective pubescent)referstotheshort,finemicrotrichiadenselycovering certainbodyparts.OthergeneralizedtermsfollowtheTorre-Bueno GlossaryofEntomology(Nichols,1989).
Speciesdescriptionsandre-descriptions
Speciesdescriptionsarebasedoncompositesofallspecimens and not exclusively onthe holotype and are compiled from a charactermatrixof144featuresand179characterstates
assem-bledwithLucidBuilder(version3.5)andeventuallyexportedas
natural-language descriptions. These species descriptions have beendepositedintheZenododatadepositoryandcanbeaccessed inXML-formatfollowingtheSDD(StructureofDescriptiveData) standard.The structureof terminaliais onlydescribed oncefor thegenusandadditionalspecies-specificfeaturesshouldbe inter-preted from the provided illustrations. All taxon names have been registered in ZooBank (Pyle and Michel, 2008). Previous taxondescriptionshavebeenmarked-upinTaxonXXMLlanguage
(Catapano,2010)anduploadedtothePlaziTreatmentBankfrom
wheretheyareaccessibleforhumanandmachinereading.
Specimenoccurrencedata
Thefollowing data onspecies occurrencesaregiven (where available): country, state/province, county, locality, geographic co-ordinates (formatted in both degrees minutes seconds and decimal latitude/longitude), elevation (in meters), date of col-lection (format: yyyy-mm-dd), habitat information, sampling protocol(if otherthan handnetting),collector,catalog number (a unique specimen number and any other identifying num-ber), depository (institution and collection code), number of specimens, sex, life stage, name of person who identified the specimen,andanyotherpreviousidentifications.Eachspecimen is listed with a unique specimen number (either an institu-tional catalog number or an AAM-XXXXXX number used by the junior author) that will allow the re-investigation as well asprovideauniqueLifeScienceIdentifier(LSID).Theoccurrence of all species is illustrated in distribution maps plotted with
http://www.simplemappr.netwithallofthoselocalitiesforwhich
co-ordinatesareavailable.Typelocalitiesareplottedwithasquare
symbolwhileallotherspecimensareplottedwithacircular sym-bol.
The distribution map includes Biodiversity Hotspots sensu
ConservationInternational (Mittermeier, 1998; Myers et al.,
2000; Mittermeier et al., 2005). The specimen occurrence
data are deposited as a DarwinCoreArchive(DwC-A) in
the GlobalBiodiversityInformationFacility(GBIF) using the
IntegratedPublishingToolkit(IPT)attheNMNH.
Photographsandillustrations
Whole habitus photographs of pinned specimens were taken using a VisionaryDigitalPassportII system (base and StackShot only), an OlympusOM-DEM-5 Micro 4/3 camera, a
60mmf2.8macrolens (equivalent to 120mm focal length in
35mm photography). The specimens were illuminated by a
FalconFLDM-i200LED dome-light for even and soft light.
Indi-vidualRAW-formatimageswerestackedusingHeliconFocusPro
(version 6.7) and exported in AdobeDNG-format. For further information on theimaging and post-production workflow see
Photographingasiloidfliesblogpost.Allphotographshave been
depositedinMorphbank::BiologicalImagingandimagesof addi-tionalspecimensareavailableonthatplatform,too.Theseimages willbeautomaticallyharvestedbytheEncyclopediaofLife(EOL)
andareavailableundertherespectivespeciespage.
Morphologicalfeatureswereillustratedusinga10×10ocular gridontheOlympusSZ60stereo microscopeandlaterdigitally convertedtovectorgraphicsusingAdobeIllustratorsoftware.The illustrationsofmaleandfemaleterminaliahavebeendepositedin digitalformat(svg-format)infigshare.
Key
The dichotomous, interactive key has been built with
LucidPhoenix and the multi-access, matrix-based key with
LucidBuilderand bothcanbeaccessedonLucidcentraland the
juniorauthor’sresearchweb-site.
Institutionsprovidingspecimens
Institutions providing specimens are listed below, together withtheabbreviationsusedinthetextwhencitingdepositories (institutionCode),alinktotherecordintheGlobalRegistryof Bio-diversityRepositories(GRBio),andthepeoplewhokindlyassisted:
AMNH –American Museumof NaturalHistory, New YorkCity, NewYork,USA(D.Grimaldi);BMNH–NaturalHistoryMuseum, London,UK(E.McAlister);CAS–CaliforniaAcademyofSciences, SanFrancisco, California, USA(M. Trautwein); CNC – Canadian NationalCollectionofInsects,ArachnidsandNematodes,Ottawa, Ontario,Canada(J.Skevington);CSCA–CaliforniaStateCollection ofArthropods,Sacramento,California,USA(M.Hauser,E.Fisher);
IMLA–FundacioneInstitutoMiguelLillo,UniversidadNacional deTucumán,Tucumán,Argentina(E.ConstanzaPerez);IADIZA– InstitutoArgentinodeInvestigazionesdelasZonasÁridas, Men-doza,Argentina(C.Dominguez,S.Roig);MNHN–Museumnational d’Histoirenaturelle,Paris,France(C.Daugeron,E.Delfosse);MUSM
–MuseodeHistoriaNatural,UniversidadNacionalMayordeSan Marcos,Lima,Peru(G.Lamas,P.SanchezFlores);MZSP–Museude Zoologia,UniversidadedeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,Brazil(C.Lamas);
SMNS – Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde,Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany(H.-P. Tschorsnig);ZSMC–Zoologische Staatssammlung,München,Bayern,Germany(M.Kotrba).
Dataresources
GBIF: specimen occurrence data-set –
7f2de377-9f9f-4276-b0b8-5c792b499223–DOI10.15468/tiymja.
figshare: illustration collection ID – DOI 10.6084/m9.
figshare.c.3650510.
LucidBuilder:illustrated,multi-entry,matrix-based
identifica-tionkey–keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/plyomydas/.
LucidPhoenix: illustrated, dichotomous identification key –
keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/phoenix/plyomydas/.
Morphbank:imagecollectionID–860614.
PlaziTreatmentBanktaxontreatments:
WilcoxandPapavero,1971–AD29FFB3FF8E2724FFC56619FFF
DFFF6
SimpleMappr:distributionmap–6102(asinFig.27)–Google
EarthKMLfile6102.
Zenodo: natural-language species descriptions from Lucid
BuilderinSDDformat–DOI10.5281/zenodo.154750.
ZooBanknomenclatorialacts:
WilcoxandPapavero,1971B57257ED-AF72-4AEB-AF09-9047
AEDF7D3F
CastilloandDikow2017FF635991-5F13-4B7D-A3E4-D314ABB
E9E98.
Taxonomy
PlyomydasWilcoxandPapavero,1971
ZooBank43AF4DE6-F7DE-4F35-801F-BF4248D531BB
Plazi TreatmentBank 43AF4DE6-F7DE-4F35-801F-BF4248D53 1BB
Plyomydas Wilcox and Papavero, 1971: 106. Type-species: PlyomydasperuviensisWilcoxandPapavero,1971,byoriginal des-ignation.
Diagnosis:ThegenusisdistinguishedfromotherMydinaebythe absenceofaventralmetathoracictibialkeel(Figs.2and20),only slightlyenlargedmetathoracicfemora(Figs.2and20),andapartly pubescentscutum(eitherstripesFig.12orspotsFig.19).Messiasia notospila(Wiedemann,1828)(seeFigs.28–33)issomewhat simi-lartoPlyomydasbecauseitexhibitsaweaklydevelopedtibialkeel andagreypubescencepatternonthescutum,butcanbeseparated fromPlyomydasbasedonthemoreexpandedmetathoracicfemur andmaleterminalia.Thedistinctventro-posteriorgonocoxal pro-cessismuchmoredevelopedinPlyomydasthanitisinMessiasia andthetwootherposteriorgonocoxalprocesses(seeFig.7)are uniquetoPlyomydaswithinMydinae(J.Calhau,pers.comm.).See alsoDiscussionfortransferofPlyomydastoMydinae:Messiasiini.
Description:F*abdomenandgenitalia(Figs.10and11):densely arrangedanteriorlydirected setaeabsentonposterior Tand S; T8 with broad anterior rectangular apodeme; T9 simple, rect-angular; T9+10 entirely fused, T10 formed by single sclerite, acanthophoritespinesabsent;3spermathecae,allequallylarge, formedby±expandedweaklysclerotizedducts;individual sper-mathecal duct short; S9 (furca) formed by 1 sclerite, inverted U-shaped(joinedanteriorly,separatedposteriorly),anterior fur-calapodemeabsent,lateralfurcalapodemepresent,medianfurcal bridgeabsent.
M* abdomen and terminalia (Figs. 7–9, 21–26): T1–7 well-developed, entirely sclerotized, T8 postero-medially weakly sclerotized,withanteriortransversesclerotizedbridgeconnecting lateralsclerites;T7–8anteriorlywith2lateralapodemes;S6 regu-lar,withoutanyspecialsetationpostero-medially;S8simpleplate, entire(undivided)ventro-medially,withhorn-likeantero-lateral processes, not fused to T8 dorso-laterally; epandrium formed bytwo sclerites,separatedmediallyand onlyjoininganteriorly, distally in dorsal view pointed postero-laterally; subepandrial sclerite without lateral or median protuberances; hypandrium
concave,cup-shaped,entirelysclerotizedventrally,entirelyfused with gonocoxite, forming a gonocoxite-hypandrial complex, supra-hypandrialscleriteabsent;gonocoxitesimple,short, hook-like,withoutmedianorlateralprotuberance,gonocoxalapodeme present,short(atmostslightlyextendinghypopygiumanteriorly); 1functionalphallicprong,shortandwide,phallicepimerepresent, distallysimple,evenlyrounded;lateralejaculatoryprocessabsent; ejaculatoryapodeme formedby single dorso-ventrally oriented plate;ventro-medianmarginofparameralsheathheavily sclero-tized(appearingentirelyclosed); parameralsheathlong,sperm sacentirelycovered;spermsacappearing±heavilysclerotized.
Plyomydasadelphesp.nov.
ZooBank27B0A7A0-0548-4F53-97AF-BCFD98B057FC
Figs.1–11,27
Diagnosis:Thespeciesisdistinguishedfromcongenersbythe scutalpubescencepatternwithonlythreepairsofgreypubescent spots(Figs.1and5)andtheabsenceofagreypubescentstripeon theposterioranepisternum(Fig.2).
Etymology: From Greek adelphe=sister, referring to overall morphologicalsimilaritytoPlyomydasphalarossp.nov.
Description: Head: black, in general grey pubescent; width distinctly greater than thorax, interocular distance on vertex largerthanatventraleyemargin,vertexbetweencompoundeyes slightly depressed, parafacialarea very narrow,facial gibbosity nearlytouchingmedianeyemargin;facialgibbositydistinct, well-developedanddiscernibleinlateralview;mystaxbrown,covering facialgibbosityexceptdorso-medially;fronsnotelevated,laterally greypubescent,mediallyapubescent;vertexapubescent;postgena lightlygreypubescent; setation: vertexblack, fronsbrown, ocp setaeyellow,poclmacrosetaeblack;ocellartriangleapubescent; proboscisbrown, long,reachingfronto-clypealsuture; labellum large,muchwiderthanprementum,longerthanprementumandas longasoralcavity,unsclerotizedlaterally;maxillarypalpus cylin-drical,lightbrown,about1/3lengthofproboscis.
Antenna:brown,bulbouspartofpostpedicellightbrown,scape andpedicelblacksetosedorsallyandventrally,rarelybrownsetose dorsallyandventrally;postpedicelcylindricalinproximal½, sym-metricallybulbousin distal ½,≥5.0 timesas longascombined lengthofscapeandpedicel,bulbouspartbrownsetosedorsally andventrally;apicalseta-likesensoryelementsituatedapicallyin cavityonpostpedicel.
Thorax:blackorbrown,predominantlyapubescentwith dis-tinctgreypubescentscutalandpleuralspots;scutumuniformly black,surfacepredominantlysmooth,postero-paramediallyrivose, lightlygreypubescentwithdistinctgreypubescentspots:1pair antero-paramedially,2 pairs laterally(1 attransverse suture,1 postero-laterally), scutalsetation comprised ofpubescent spots long black or brown setose; dc setae pre- and postsuturally black,acr setae absent,lateralscutalsetaeblack or brown,npl setae0,spalsetae0,palsetae0;antepronotumdorso-medially smooth (without anyindentation); postpronotallobebrownto black,lightlygreypubescent;proepisternum,lateral postprono-tum,andpostpronotallobelongblacksetose;scutellumlightlygrey pubescent,brownsetose,apicalscutellarsetaeabsent; mesopost-notum,anatergite,andkatatergitelightlygreypubescent,asetose, katatergiteelevatedandsmoothlyconvex;anterioranepisternum lightly grey pubescent, asetose, supero-posterior anepisternum apubescent, asetose; posterior anepimeron long brown setose, katepimeron asetose; metanepisternum lightly grey pubescent, asetose, metepimeron evenly elevated, same color as T1, grey pubescent,asetose;infra-halterscleriteabsent.
Leg: light brown to brown, setation predominantly black; pro, mes, and met coxa lightly grey pubescent, black setose; met trochanter setose medially; femur black or brown, met
Figs.1–6.PhotographsofmaleandfemalePlyomydasadelphesp.nov.:(1)M*holotype(USNMENT01242234),dorsal(Morphbank#860756);(2)same,lateral(#860758);
(3)same,headanterior(#860760);(4)F*paratype(AAM-004053),headanterior(#860784);(5)same,dorsal(#860780);(6)same,lateral(#860782).Scaleline=5mm.
femur±cylindricalonlyslightlywider thanproandmesfemur, indistal ½ macrosetose,1antero-ventraland 1postero-ventral rowofmacrosetae,postero-ventrallylongbrownsetose;proand mestibialaterally arched,mettibiastraight,mettibia cylindri-cal,ventralkeelabsent,postero-laterallyregularsetose;proand mestarsomere1longerthantarsomere2,butlessthancombined lengthoftarsomeres2–3,mettarsomere1aslongascombined lengthoftarsomeres2–3;pulvilluswell-developed,aslongas well-developedclaw,andaswideasbaseofclaw;setiformempodium absent.
Wing:length=15.2–18.5mm; lightbrownstained,especially alongveins,distal¼andposteriormarginunstained,veinsbrown, microtrichiaabsent;cellsr1,r4,r5,m3,+cupclosedexceptr5open;
Cwell-developed,aroundentirewing;R4terminatesinR1;R5
ter-minatesinR1;stumpvein(R3)atbaseofR4present,longbutnot
reachingR2;R4andR5±parallelmedially;r-mdistinct,R4+5and
M1 apart,connectedbycrossvein; M1 curves slightly anteriorly
atr-m,M1(orM1+M2)terminatesinC;M4andCuAsplit
prox-imallytom-cu(cellm3 narrowproximally); M3+M4 terminate
togetherinC(reachingwingmargin);CuPstraight,cellcupwide, CuPandwingmarginfurtherapartproximallythandistally;alula well-developed,verylargeandpartlyoverlappingwithscutellum medially;halterbrown.
Abdomen: brown to metallic bluish-black; setation com-prised of scattered black setae, surface entirely smooth; T1–7 brownwithnarrowyellowposterior margin;T1 longbrownto blacksetose,T2–7shortblacksetose;T1lightlygreypubescent, T2–7apubescent;S1brownwithlightbrownposteriormargin, S2–6 brown withnarrow yellow posterior margin; S1 asetose, S2–7 sparsely black setose; S apubescent; T2–4 parallel-sided and not constrictedwaist-like; bullae onT2 black,transversely elongate, surface entirelysmooth, T2surface anterior tobullae smooth.
Typelocality:Argentina:Mendoza:Rt.142atMendozaRiver, 32◦3529S068◦1728W(−32.59139−68.29111).
Materialexamined:Argentina:Mendoza:1M*Rt.142at Men-dozaRiver,21kmNECostadeAraujo,32◦3529S068◦1728W, −32.59139−68.29111,585m,2015-12-04,Steiner,W., Swearin-gen, J. (USNMENT01242234, Holotype, IADIZA); 1F* Mendoza, 35◦5200S 068◦4900W, −32.88944 −68.84583, 1907-00-00 (AAM-004053,Paratype,ZSMC);LaRioja:1M*CuestadeMiranda, 29◦1900S067◦3900W,−29.31667−67.65,1700m,1977-11-29, Willink,A.,Fidalgo(AAM-002719,Paratype,MZSP).
Distributionandbiodiversityhotspot:WesternArgentinainthe provincesofLaRiojaandMendoza(Fig.27).Notknowntooccurin anybiodiversityhotspot.
Figs.7–11.MaleandfemaleterminaliaofPlyomydasadelphesp.nov.:(1)M*paratype(MZSP-MZ003844),lateral(posteriorgonocoxalprocesseshighlightedingrey);(2)
same,dorsal;(3)same,ventral;(4)F*paratype(AAM-004053),dorsal;(5)same,ventral.Scaleline=1mm,setationomitted.FigshareDOI10.6084/m9.figshare.4490462.
Remarks:Sexualdimorphismisminimal.Basedonthethree knownspecimens,femalesarelarger(winglength18.5mminthe solefemale paratype, 15.2–16.6mm in two males) and dimor-phismonlyoccursincoloroflegsandsclerites.Theholotypewas collectedinlowflatmesquitedesertanddryriverbed.
PlyomydasperuviensisWilcoxandPapavero,1971:108
ZooBankF954F6B0-BC56-4C16-BB82-0D2734030993
Plazi TreatmentBank 511087CB-FFCB-276D-FC9D-67B4FB8EF D41
Figs.12–14,21–23,27
Diagnosis: The species is distinguished from congeners by thescutalpubescencepatternwiththreedistinctgreypubescent stripes(nospots,Fig.12),thepresenceofagreypubescentstripeon theposterioranepisternum(Fig.13),anditsdistributionincoastal Peru(Fig.27).
Description: Head: brown, facial gibbosity light brown, in generalgreypubescent;widthdistinctlygreaterthanthorax, inte-roculardistanceonvertexlargerthanatventraleyemargin,vertex betweencompoundeyesslightlydepressed,parafacialareavery narrow,facialgibbositynearlytouchingmedianeyemargin;facial gibbositydistinct,well-developedanddiscernibleinlateralview; mystaxyellow,sparse;fronsnotelevated,entirelygreypubescent; vertexentirelygreypubescent;postgenalightlygreypubescent; setation: vertex yellow, frons brownor light brown, ocp setae yellow,poclmacrosetaelightbrown;ocellartriangleapubescent; proboscisbrown,long, reachingfronto-clypealsuture; labellum large,muchwiderthanprementum,longerthanprementumandas longasoralcavity,unsclerotizedlaterally;maxillarypalpus cylin-drical,lightbrown,about¼lengthofproboscis.
Antenna:brown,bulbouspartofpostpedicellightbrown,scape andpedicelbrownsetosedorsallyandventrally;postpedicel cylin-dricalinproximal2/5,symmetricallybulbousindistal3/5,≥5.0 timesaslongascombinedlengthofscapeandpedicel,bulbous
partbrownsetosedorsallyandventrally;apicalseta-likesensory elementsituatedapicallyincavityonpostpedicel.
Thorax:lightbrown,predominantlyapubescentwithdistinct greypubescentscutalstripesandpleuralspots;scutumuniformly brown, surface predominantly smooth, postero-paramedially rivose, predominantly grey pubescent, apubescent paramedian andmedianstripes(notreachingposteriormargin),scutal seta-tioncomprisedofpubescentstripesshortblacksetose;dcsetae pre-andpostsuturallybrown,acrsetaeabsent,lateralscutalsetae brown,nplsetae0,spalsetae0,palsetae0;antepronotum dorso-medially smooth (without any indentation); postpronotal lobe lightbrown,greypubescent;proepisternum,lateralpostpronotum, andpostpronotallobeshortbrownsetose;scutellumlightlygrey pubescent,laterallydenselygreypubescent,brownsetose,apical scutellarsetaeabsent;mesopostnotum,anatergite,andkatatergite lightlygreypubescent,asetose,katatergiteelevatedandsmoothly convex; anterior anepisternum lightly grey pubescent, asetose, supero-posterioranepisternumgreypubescent,asetose;posterior anepimeronshortbrownsetose,katepimeronasetose; metanepis-ternumgrey pubescent, asetose, metepimeron evenly elevated, same color as T1, grey pubescent, asetose;infra-halter sclerite absent.
Leg: light brown to brown, setation predominantly brown; pro, mes,and met coxa lightly grey pubescent, brown setose; met trochanter setose medially; femur light brown, met femur±cylindricalonlyslightlywider thanproandmesfemur, indistal ½ macrosetose,1antero-ventraland 1postero-ventral rowofmacrosetae,postero-ventrallylongbrownsetose;proand mestibialaterally arched,mettibiastraight, mettibia cylindri-cal,ventralkeelabsent,postero-laterallyregularsetose;proand mestarsomere1longerthantarsomere2,butlessthancombined lengthoftarsomeres2–3,mettarsomere1aslongascombined lengthoftarsomeres2–3;pulvilluswell-developed,aslongas well-developedclaw,andaswideasbaseofclaw;setiformempodium absent.
Figs.12–14.PhotographsofmalePlyomydasperuviensis(AAM-003731):(12)dorsal(Morphbank#860772);(13)same,lateral(#860774);(14)same,headanterior(#860776). Scaleline=5mm.
Wing:length=10.7–13.0mm;slightlybrownstained through-out, veins brown, microtrichia absent; cells r1, r4, r5, m3,+cup
closedexceptr5 open;Cwell-developed,aroundentirewing;R4
terminatesinR1;R5terminatesinR1;stumpvein(R3)atbaseofR4
present,longbutnotreachingR2;R4andR5±parallelmedially;
r-mdistinct,R4+5andM1apart,connectedbycrossvein;M1curves
slightlyanteriorlyatr-m,M1(orM1+M2)terminatesinC;M4and
CuAsplitproximallytom-cu(cellm3narrowproximally);M3+M4
terminatetogetherinC(reachingwingmargin);CuPstraight,cell cupwide,CuPandwingmarginfurtherapartproximallythan dis-tally;alulawell-developed,verylargeandpartlyoverlappingwith scutellummedially;halterlightbrown.
Abdomen:browntometallicbluish-black;setationcomprised ofsparselyscatteredshortbrownsetae,surfaceentirelysmooth; T1–7 brown with narrow yellow posterior margin; T1 long lightbrownsetose,T2–7sparselybrownsetose;T1lightlygrey pubescent,T2–7apubescent;S1brownwithlightbrownposterior margin,S2–6brownwithnarrowyellowposteriormargin;S1 ase-tose,S2–7sparselyblacksetose;Sapubescent;T2–4parallel-sided and notconstricted waist-like; bullae onT2black, transversely elongate, surfaceentirely smooth,T2 surface anterior tobullae smooth.
F*abdomen:Nofemalewasavailablefordetailedstudy. Type locality: Peru: Lima: Lima, 12◦0300S 077◦0200W (−12.05−77.03333).
Materialexamined:Peru:Ica:1F*EglisedePisco,13◦4236S 076◦1212W, −13.71 −76.20333, 1954-12-29, Dorst (AAM-001235, MNHN); La Libertad: 1M* Cartavio, 07◦5330S 079◦1322W,−7.89167−79.22278,0000-00-00,Smyth,E. (AAM-003729,Paratype,AMNH); 1M*Cartavio,0000-00-00,Smyth,E. (AAM-003730, Paratype, AMNH); Lima: 1M* Lima, 12◦0300S 077◦0200W, −12.05 −77.03333, 1939-02-08, Weyrauch, W. (MZSP-MZ001668, Holotype, MZSP); 1M* Lima, 1968-01-15, Picho, H. (MZSP-MZ003836, Paratype, MZSP); 1F* Lima, 1969-02-11,Razuri,V.(MZSP-MZ003837,Paratype,MZSP);1M*Lima, 1939-02-08,Weyrauch,W.(CNCDiptera198085,CNC);1M*Lima,
1948-04-00(AAM-003005,MUSM); 1M*Hacienda Chuquitanta, 12◦0432S076◦5700W,−12.07556−76.95,1974-03-10,Lamas, G.,Medina,N.(AAM-003742,MUSM);1M*Antioquia,12◦0449S 076◦3036W, −12.08028−76.51,1975-01-11,Garcia, R. (AAM-003737, MUSM); 1M* La Molina, 12◦0454S 076◦5545W, −12.08167 −76.92917, 280 m, 1966-03-11, Garcia, R. (AAM-003769,MUSM);1M* LaMolina, 280m,1966-03-11,Garcia, R. (AAM-003731, MUSM);1F*nolocality data (BMNH(E)1202927, BMNH).
Distributionandbiodiversityhotspot:CoastalPeru(Fig.27).Not knowntooccurinanybiodiversityhotspot.
Remarks:Thedescriptionaboveisbasedonmalespecimens only because no females were available for detailed study to provideanupdatedF*descriptionandinclusioninthismanuscript althoughthree specimens(see above)had beenstudiedseveral years ago and can be unambiguously assigned to this species. Sexualdimorphismismostlikelyminimalasintheotherspecies andthefemaleterminaliawillmostlikelybeidenticaltoP.adelphe sp.nov.andP.phalarossp.nov.ThefemalespecimenintheBMNH (BMNH(E)1202927) was apparently studied by Macquart and labeledMydasperuvianus,butneverdescribedasanewspeciesby him.
Plyomydasphalarossp.nov.
ZooBankAA0C21E1-0420-4A8A-93F3-40DC17864BCE
Figs.15–20,24–27
Diagnosis:Thespeciesisdistinguishedfromcongenersbythe scutalpubescencepatternwithfourpairsandapostero-median greypubescentspot(Figs.15–16,19–20),andthepresenceofagrey pubescentstripeontheposterioranepisternum(Figs.16and20).
Etymology:FromGreekphalaros=white-spotted,referring to thedistinctivegreypubescentspotsonthescutum.
Description:Head:brown, in generalgrey pubescent;width distinctly greater than thorax, interocular distance on vertex largerthanatventraleyemargin,vertexbetweencompoundeyes
Figs.15–20. PhotographsofmaleandfemalePlyomydasphalarossp.nov.:(15)M*holotype(AAM-005629),dorsal(Morphbank#860834);(16)same,lateral(#860836);(17)
same,headanterior(#860838);(18)F*paratype(MZSPMZ003846),headanterior(#860752);(19)same,dorsal(#860524);(20)same,lateral(#860750).Scaleline=5mm.
Figs.21–26. MaleterminaliaofPlyomydasspecies:(21)Plyomydasperuviensis(AAM-003729),lateral;(22)same,dorsal;(23)same,ventral;(24)Plyomydasphalarossp.nov. paratype(CASENT8380022),lateral;(25)same,dorsal;(26)same,ventral.Scaleline=1mm,setationomitted.FigshareDOI10.6084/m9.figshare.4490474.
Fig.27.MapofSouthAmericawithelevationalreliefandbiodiversityhotspots(ingrey)showingdistributionofPlyomydasadelphesp.nov.(orange),P.peruviensis (yellow),andP.phalarossp.nov.(blue).Typelocalitiesplottedwithsquaresymbols.MapdataavailableinGoogleEarthKMLfile6102andalsothroughGBIF(data-set 7f2de377-9f9f-4276-b0b8-5c792b499223,DOI10.15468/tiymja).
slightly depressed, parafacialarea very narrow,facial gibbosity nearlytouchingmedianeyemargin;facialgibbositydistinct, well-developedanddiscernibleinlateralview;mystaxbrown,covering facialgibbosityexceptdorso-medially;fronsnotelevated,laterally greypubescent,mediallyapubescent;vertexapubescent;postgena lightlygreypubescent;setation:vertexbrown,fronsbrown,ocp setaeyellow,poclmacrosetaebrown;ocellartriangleapubescent; proboscisbrown, long,reachingfronto-clypealsuture; labellum large,muchwiderthanprementum,longerthanprementumandas longasoralcavity,unsclerotizedlaterally;maxillarypalpus cylin-drical,lightbrown,about1/3lengthofproboscis.
Antenna:brown,bulbouspartofpostpedicellightbrown,scape andpedicelblacksetosedorsallyandventrally,rarelybrownsetose dorsallyandventrally;postpedicelcylindricalinproximal½, sym-metricallybulbousin distal ½,≥5.0 timesas longascombined lengthofscapeandpedicel,bulbouspartbrownsetosedorsally andventrally;apicalseta-likesensoryelementsituatedapicallyin cavityonpostpedicel.
Thorax:brown,predominantlyapubescent withdistinctgrey pubescentscutalandpleuralspots;scutumuniformlyblack, sur-facepredominantlysmooth,postero-paramediallyrivose,lightly
greypubescentwithdistinctgreypubescentspots:1pair antero-paramedially,3pairslaterally(1antero-laterally,1attransverse suture,1postero-laterally),1spotpostero-medially,scutal seta-tioncomprised of pubescentspots longblack orbrownsetose; dc setae pre- and postsuturally black, acr setae absent, lat-eral scutal setaebrown, nplsetae 0, spal setae 0, palsetae 0; antepronotumdorso-mediallysmooth(withoutanyindentation); postpronotallobebrown,predominantlygreypubescent; proepis-ternum,lateralpostpronotum, andpostpronotallobelongblack setose; scutellumlightly grey pubescent,laterally densely grey pubescent,brownsetose,apicalscutellarsetaeabsent; mesopost-notum,anatergite,andkatatergitelightlygreypubescent,asetose, katatergiteelevatedandsmoothlyconvex;anterioranepisternum lightly grey pubescent, asetose, supero-posterior anepisternum greypubescent,asetose;posterioranepimeronlongbrownsetose, katepimeron asetose;metanepisternum lightly grey pubescent, asetose, metepimeron evenly elevated, same color as T1, grey pubescent,asetose;infra-halterscleriteabsent.
Leg:brown,setationpredominantlyblack;pro,mes,andmet coxalightlygreypubescent,blacksetose;mettrochantersetose medially;femurbrown,metfemur±cylindricalonlyslightlywider
thanproandmesfemur,indistal½macrosetose,1antero-ventral and1postero-ventralrowofmacrosetae,postero-ventrallylong brownsetose;proandmestibialaterallyarched,mettibiastraight, mettibiacylindrical,ventralkeelabsent,postero-laterallyregular setose;proandmestarsomere1longerthantarsomere2,butless thancombinedlengthoftarsomeres2–3,mettarsomere1aslong ascombinedlengthoftarsomeres2–3;pulvilluswell-developed,as longaswell-developedclaw,andaswideasbaseofclaw;setiform empodiumabsent.
Wing:length=16.7–20.8mm;light brownstained,especially alongveins,distal¼andposteriormarginunstained,veinsbrown, microtrichiaabsent;cellsr1,r4,r5,m3,+cupclosedexceptr5open;
Cwell-developed,aroundentirewing;R4terminatesinR1;R5
ter-minatesinR1;stumpvein(R3)atbaseofR4present,longbutnot
reachingR2;R4andR5±parallelmedially;r-mdistinct,R4+5and
M1 apart,connectedbycrossvein;M1 curves slightlyanteriorly
atr-m,M1(orM1+M2)terminatesinC;M4 andCuAsplit
prox-imallytom-cu(cellm3 narrowproximally); M3+M4 terminate
togetherinC(reachingwingmargin);CuPstraight,cellcupwide, CuPandwingmarginfurtherapartproximallythandistally;alula well-developed,verylargeandpartlyoverlappingwithscutellum medially;halterbrown.
Abdomen:browntometallicbluish-black;setationcomprised of scattered black setae, surface entirely smooth; T1–7brown withnarrow yellow posterior margin; T1 long brown to black setose,T2–7shortblacksetose;T1lightlygreypubescent,T2–7 apubescent;S1brownwithlight brownposterior margin,S2–6 brownwith narrow yellowposterior margin; S1 asetose, S2–7 sparselyblacksetose;Sapubescent;T2–4parallel-sidedandnot constrictedwaist-like;bullaeonT2black,transverselyelongate, surfaceentirelysmooth,T2surfaceanteriortobullaesmooth.
Type locality: Argentina: Catamarca: Belén, 27◦3859S 067◦0158W(−27.64972−67.03278).
Material examined: Argentina: Catamarca: 1M* Belén, 27◦3859S 067◦0158W, −27.64972 −67.03278, 1975-11-25, Bohart,R.(AAM-005629,Holotype, CSCA);1F*1M*Belén,6km S, 27◦4347S 067◦0115W, −27.72972 −67.02083, 1975-11-25, Stange, L. (M* AAM-002714, F* AAM-002718, Paratypes, IMLA); 1F* 4M* Belén, 6km S, 1975-11-25, Stange, L. (MZSP-MZ003838–MZSP-MZ003841, MZSP-MZ003846, Paratypes, MZSP);Salta: 1M*Cafayate,22kmN, 26◦0256S065◦5401W, −26.04889−65.90028, 1578m, 2003-11-13,whitesand dunes, Irwin,M.,Parker,F.(CASENT8380021–CASENT8380022,Paratypes, CAS); 1M* Cafayate, 26◦0406S 065◦5829W, −26.06833 −65.97472,1700m, 1991-01-05,dune,Osten,T.(AAM-003864, Paratype, SMNS); 1M* Cafayate, 1993-11-14, Rozen, J., Rozen, B. (AAM-004054, Paratype, AMNH); Paraguay: San Pedro: 1M* Carumbé, 24◦0846S 056◦3730W, −23.95 −56.6, 1973-01-10–1973-02-10, Golbach, R. (MZSP-MZ003843, Paratype, MZSP).
Distributionandbiodiversityhotspot:WesternArgentina (Cata-marcaandSalta)andParaguay(SanPedro)(Fig.27).Thegeographic co-ordinatesforCarumbé(Paraguay)aretakenfromGBIFrecord
416921317. The easternmost distribution of this species in
ParaguayoverlapswiththeAtlanticForestbiodiversityhotspot. Remarks:Sexualdimorphismisminimalwithonlyslight differ-encesincolorofscleritesorsetae.Thetwofemalesstudiedhave awinglengthof19.3–19.4mmwhilemaleshave awinglength of 16.7–20.8mm. Two specimens (AAM-003864, AAM-002715) lackthepostero-mediangreypubescentspotdirectlyanteriorto thescutellum.WebelievethatthesetwospecimensbelongtoP. phalarossp.nov.though.ThedisjunctdistributionofP.phalaros sp.nov. in mid-elevationwestern Argentina and low-elevation Paraguay is interesting.We haveno reasonto believethat the Paraguayan specimen (AAM-002720) is mislabeled as a search ontheinternetrevealsthatotherinsectshavebeencollectedby
R.GolbachinCarumbéinthe1970s(Googlesearch)providing evi-dencethatthespecimeniscorrectlylabeled.
Keytospecies
1. Scutumpredominantlydenselygreypubescent,onlymedian stripe(notreachingposteriormargin)andparamedianstripes apubescent(Fig.12);coastalPeruvianAndes...peruviensis - Scutumpredominantlyapubescent,withonlywidelyseparated
anteriorandlateralgreypubescentspots(Fig.1);western ArgentinaandParaguay...2
2. Scutumwithonlythreepairsofgreypubescentspots (antero-lateralspotposteriortopostpronotallobeabsent, Figs.1–2)andwithoutpostero-medianpubescentspot(Fig.1); scutellumonlylightlypubescent;anepisternumwithoutposterior pubescentstripe(Fig.2);postpronotallobelightlygreypubescent ...adelphesp.nov.
- Scutumwithfourpairsofgreypubescentspots(antero-lateral spotposteriortopostpronotallobedistinct,Figs.15and16)and withpostero-mediangreypubescentspot(inadditiontoother spotsalthoughabsentintwostudiedspecimens,Figs.15and19); scutellumdenselygreypubescentlaterally;anepisternumwith narrowposteriorpubescentstripe(Figs.16and20);postpronotal lobedistinctlygreypubescent...phalarossp.nov.
Discussion
Maleterminaliaareoftenreliableindelimitingspecies bound-aries,buttheycanbeconservedamongspeciesofagenusoreven acrossgenericboundariessuchasinAfrotropicalSyllegomydinae
(Dikow,inpress).WithinPlyomydas,themaleterminaliaarevery
similarinallthree speciesand cannoteasilybedescribed with wordssothat wedeferthereader tocomparetheillustrations
(Figs. 7–9, 21–26).Wepostulate that inthis taxonthethoracic
pubescencepattern isreliable forspecies delimitationand that comparisonofmaleterminaliaisunnecessaryatthisstage.
TransferfromLeptomydinaetoMydinae:Messiasiini
WilcoxandPapavero(1971),Papavero(2009),andPapaveroand
Artigas(2009)considerPlyomydastobelongtoLeptomydinae.This
ischieflybasedontheabsenceofakeelontheventral metatho-racictibia,whichis absentinPlyomydasandLeptomydinae,but presentinvirtuallyallMydinae(anexceptionisMessiasianotospila (Wiedemann,1828)knownfromArgentina,Brazil,Paraguay,and Uruguaywithaweaklydevelopedkeel(Figs.28–33)).Weregard theabsenceofthemetathoracictibialkeeltobeasimplelossofthis featureandnotanimportantfeaturetoplacethegenus Plyomy-dasinLeptomydinae.Instead,asinallMydinae,andseveralother Mydidaegenera,veinM3+M4reachesthecostalveinCinPlyomydas
(Fig. 12) and which is absentin all Leptomydinae genera. Fur-thermore,thefemaleterminaliaofPlyomydaslackacanthophorite spinesandtergite10isasinglesclerite(Fig.10)asfoundinall Mydinae,Cacatuopyginae,andthreegeneraofSyllegomydinaein theAfrotropicalRegion(Dikow,inpress).AllknownLeptomydinae, incontrast,utilizeadividedtergite10withacanthophoritespines toovipositinsandorsoil.Fromtheshapeofthefemaleterminalia wecanpostulatethatPlyomydasspeciesovipositineitherdecaying woodorantnestsashasbeenobservedinotherMydinaetaxa(see
PapaveroandArtigas,2009).
NotethatthekeytoNeotropicalsubfamiliesinPapaveroand
Artigas(2009)isincorrectincouplet11whereitshouldread“Hind
tibiawithventralkeel(carinate).SubfamilyMydinae...12”and “Hindtibiacylindrical.SubfamilyLeptomydinae...23”.Thiskey willkeyoutPlyomydascorrectly,butwithinLeptomydinaeandnot withinMydinaeasproposedhere.
TheMydinaearecurrentlydividedintofourtribes(Papavero
andWilcox, 1974;Wilcoxet al.,1989)and weplacePlyomydas
Figs.28–33. PhotographsofmaleandfemaleMessiasianotospila(Argentina:EntreRios:Pronunciamiento,32◦2045S058◦2640W,1970-03-00,Bolle,S.):(28)M*
(CNCDiptera198880),dorsal(Morphbank#860859);(29)same,lateral(#860861);(30)same,headanterior(#860863);(31)F*(CNCDiptera198880),headanterior(#860870);
(32)same,dorsal(#860866);(33)same,lateral(#860868).Scaleline=5mm.
includedgenussofar,inantennal,proboscis,andfemaleterminalia morphology.WithPlyomydasnowinMydinae,Leptomydinaeisa taxonrestrictedtotheNorthernHemispherewiththeexceptionof HessemydasfromMadagascar.
Seasonalincidence
SpeciesofPlyomydashaveonlybeencollectedduringthe South-ernHemispheresummertoearlyautumn.Plyomydasadelphesp. nov.hasbeencollectedinNovember–December,Plyomydas peru-viensisbetweenDecember–April,andPlyomydasphalarossp.nov. inNovemberinArgentinaandJanuary–FebruaryinParaguay.
Biodiversityhotspots
WiththeexceptionofthesinglespecimenofPlyomydasphalaros sp.nov.fromParaguay,whichisdistributedintheAtlanticForest biodiversityhotspot,thegenusisnotconfinedtoanddoesnotoccur inanybiodiversityhotspotsensuConservationInternational.
Conflictsofinterest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
Acknowledgments
Wewouldliketothankthemuseumcuratorswhomade speci-mensavailablethroughloansandfortheirhospitalitywhenvisiting thecollections.WarrenSteiner(NMNH,Washington,DC,USA)is thanked for bringing the newly collectedspecimen, now holo-type, of Plyomydasadelphe sp.nov. toour attentionand Donat Agosti(Plazi,Bern,Switzerland)forhelp withaddingthe origi-naltaxondescriptionstothePlaziTreatmentBank.WethankJulia Calhaufor insight intothemale terminaliaof Mydinaespecies. Wefurthermorethankthetwopeerreviewerswhoprovided con-structivecommentsthatenhancedthemanuscript.Wegratefully acknowledgesupportfromtheU.S.NationalScienceFoundation forfundingtheResearchExperienceforUndergraduatessitegrant calledNaturalHistoryResearchExperience(NHRE)(OCE1560088; PIE.Cottrell,Co-PIE.Hunt)throughwhichtheseniorauthor par-ticipatedin this researchproject. Special thanksto Gene Hunt,
ElizabethCottrell,andVirginiaPowerfortheirsupportand admin-istrationoftheNHREProgram.Partofthisprojectwasfundedby aU.S.NationalScienceFoundationREVSYSaward(DEB0919333; PIT.Dikow,Co-PIDavidYeates).Anyopinions,findings,and con-clusionsor recommendations expressedin this manuscript are thoseoftheauthorsand donotnecessarily reflecttheviewsof theNationalScienceFoundation.
References
Almeida,J.C.,Lamas,C.J.E.,2014.Mydidae.In:Claps,L.E.,Roig-Ju ˜nent,S.(Eds.), Bio-diversidaddeArtrópodosArgentinos,vol.4.UniversidadNacionaldeTucumán, SanMigueldeTucumán,pp.425–430.
Calhau,J.,Lamas,C.J.E.,Nihei,S.S., 2015.ReviewoftheGauromydasgiantflies (Insecta,Diptera,Mydidae),withdescriptionsoftwonewspeciesfromCentral andSouthAmerica.Zootaxa4048(3),392–411.
Catapano,T.,2010.TaxPub:anextensionoftheNLM/NCBIjournalpublishingDTD fortaxonomicdescriptions.In:ProceedingsoftheJournalArticleTagSuite Con-ference,http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK47081/.
Cumming,J.M.,Wood,D.M.,2009.2.Adultmorphologyandterminology.In:Brown, B.V.,Borkent,A.,Cumming,J.M.,Wood,D.M.,Woodley,N.E.,Zumbado,M.A. (Eds.),ManualofCentralAmericanDiptera,vol.1.NRCPress,Ottawa,pp.9–50. Dikow,T.,2009.PhylogenyofAsilidaeinferredfrommorphologicalcharactersof imagines(Insecta:Diptera:Brachycera:Asiloidea).Bull.Am.Mus.Nat.Hist.319, 1–175.
Dikow,T.,2017.47.Mydidae(MydasFlies).In:Kirk-Spriggs,A.H.,Sinclair,B.J.(Eds.), ManualofAfrotropicalDiptera,vol.1.Introductorychapters,nematocerous DipteraandlowerBrachycera.SANBI,Pretoria(inpress).
Mittermeier,R.A.,1998.Biodiversityhotspotsandmajortropicalwildernessareas: approachestosettingconservationpriorities.Conserv.Biol.12(3),516–520. Mittermeier,R.A.,Gil,P.R.,Hoffman,M.,Pilgrim,J.,Brooks,T.M.,Mittermeier,C.G.,
Lamoreaux,J.,daFonseca,G.A.B.,2005.HotspotsRevisited:Earth’sBiologically RichestandMostEndangeredTerrestrial Ecoregions.Conservation Interna-tional,Washington,DC.
Myers,N.,Mittermeier,R.A.,Mittermeier,C.G.,daFonseca,G.A.B.,Kent,J.,2000. Biodiversityhotspotsforconservationpriorities.Nature403(6772),853–858. Nichols,S.W.,1989.TheTorre-BuenoGlossaryofEntomology.TheNewYork
Ento-mologicalSociety,NewYork.
Papavero,N.,2009.CatalogueofNeotropicalDiptera.Mydidae.Neotrop.Diptera14, 1–31,http://revistas.ffclrp.usp.br/Neotropical Diptera/issue/view/32. Papavero, N., Artigas, J.N., 2009. Manual of Neotropical Diptera.
Mydi-dae. Neotrop. Diptera 15, 1–58, http://revistas.ffclrp.usp.br/Neotropical Diptera/issue/view/33.
Papavero,N.,Wilcox,J.,1974.StudiesofMydidae(Diptera)systematicsand evo-lution.II.ClassificationoftheMydinae,withdescriptionofanewgenusanda revisionofCeriomydasWilliston.Arq.Zool.25(1),35–60.
Pyle, R.L., Michel, E., 2008. Zoobank: Developing a nomenclatural tool for unifying 250 years of biological information. Zootaxa 1950, 39–50, http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2008/f/zt01950p050.pdf.
Stuckenberg,B.R.,1999.AntennalevolutionintheBrachycera(Diptera),witha reassessmentofterminologyrelatingtotheflagellum.StudiaDipterol.6(1), 33–48.
Wilcox,J.,Papavero,N.,1971.TheAmericangeneraofMydidae(Diptera),withthe descriptionofthreenewgeneraandtwonewspecies.Arq.Zool.21(2),41–119. Wilcox,J.,Papavero,N.,Pimentel,T.,1989.StudiesofMydidae(Diptera).IVb.Mydas andalliesintheAmericas(Mydinae:Mydini).MuseuParaenseEmilioGoeldi (Colec¸ãoEmilieSnethlage),pp.1–139.
Wootton,R.J.,Ennos,A.R.,1989.Theimplicationsoffunctionontheoriginand homologiesofthedipterouswing.Syst.Entomol.14(4),507–520.