w ww . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b j p
Original
Article
Yeast
extract
elicitation
increases
vinblastine
and
vincristine
yield
in
protoplast
derived
tissues
and
plantlets
in
Catharanthus
roseus
Mehpara
Maqsood,
Mujib
Abdul
∗JamiaHamdard,HamdardNagar,NewDelhi,India
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received17January2017 Accepted23May2017 Availableonline29July2017
Keywords: Embryogeniccallus Elicitor
Protoplastisolation Vinblastine Vincristine Yeastextract
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Catharanthusroseus(L.)G.Don,Apocynaceae,isanimmenselyimportantmedicinalplant,producesa varietyofanticancerouscompounds.Theyieldoftwomostinvestigatedalkaloidsvinblastineand vin-cristineisunfortunatelyverylow.Avastarrayoftechnologiesincludingelicitationhaverecentlybeen usedtoenrichCatharanthusalkaloidinculture.Yeastextractisabioticelicitor,thepolysaccharideand thepeptidemoietyhavebeenrecognizedasasignallingelementinenrichingsecondarymetabolites.In thisstudy,theyeastextractelicitationonvinblastineandvincristinewasstudiedinvariousprotoplast derivedtissuesandplantlets.Fourdifferentyeastextracttreatments(T1=0.5g/l,T2=1.0g/l,T3=1.5g/l andT4=2.0g/l)werepreparedandused.Thealkaloidwasquantifiedandacomparativeaccountofyield werepresentedbytheuseofHighperformancethinlayerchromatography.Theyeastextractamendment inmediumimprovedvinblastineandvincristineyieldincultivatingtissues,maximumbeingin germinat-ingembryosandininvitroraisedleaf.ThehighestyieldwasinT3(1.5mg/l)inwhich22.74%vinblastine and48.49%vincristineenrichmentwasnotedingerminatingembryos;theenhancementwashowever, treatment-specific.Antioxidantenzymessuchassuperoxidedismutase,catalase,ascorbateperoxidase andglutathionereductaseactivitieswereinvestigatedasadditionofyeastextractcausedcellularstress andhadenrichedlevelofalkaloids.
©2017SociedadeBrasileiradeFarmacognosia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisisanopen accessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
Catharanthusroseus(L.)G.Don(Madagascarperiwinkle)belongs tothefamilyApocynaceae.Itisanimportantmedicinalplantand it contains a wide variety of anti-cancerousalkaloids (Van Der Heijdenetal.,2004;Mujibetal.,2012).Amongthose,vinblastine (VB)andvincristine(VC)arethemostimportantdrugs(Moreno, 1995)andthesetwoalkaloidsareusedasatherapeuticagentto treatagainstanumberofcancers(Mukherjeeetal.,2001).Thelow yieldofalkaloidsinplanthasencouragedresearcherstoexplore otheralternativeproduction methods byusinginvitro cultures (Verpoorteetal.,2002;Nazetal.,2015),metabolicengineering (DeLucaandStPierre,2000),semi-synthesis(Kutneyetal.,1991) or even total chemical synthesis (Kuboyama et al.,2004).In C. roseus,varioussemi-syntheticproceduresweredevelopedbyusing chemicalsandenzymaticcouplingofcommerciallyavailable catha-ranthineandvindoline(Goodbodyetal.,1988;Morenoetal.,1995). In recent years, various culturalpractices such asoptimization ofculturemedia,selection ofhighalkaloid producingcelllines,
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:amujib@jamiahamdard.ac.in(M.Abdul).
precursor feeding,bioconversionand metabolicengineeringare successfullyutilizedforenrichingalkaloidsincultivatedcells(Van DerHeijdenetal.,2004;ZarateandVerpoorte,2007;Mujibetal., 2012;TeixeiradaSilvaandDobranszki,2016).Ithasearlierbeen notedthatanexogenousamendmentofspecificgroupsof com-pounds tomedium drasticallyincreasedthe yieldof secondary metabolites(Ibrahimetal.,2009;Murthyetal.,2014).These exter-naltriggersarebioticandabioticinnature;inthebiotictypesthe microbial extractssuchas Pythium,Botrytis, Phytophthora, Pseu-domonas and Aspergillus are observed to be very effective in a varietyofcellculturesincludingC.roseus(Valluri,2009;Mustafa etal.,2009;Diptietal.,2016).
Yeastextract(YE)isanimportantelicitorandisfoundtoberich invitaminB-complex.Italsocontainsessentialcomponentslike chitin, N-acetyl-glucosamineoligomers, -glucan, glycopeptides andergosterol(Boller,1995);thesecompoundselicitplantdefense responsesbytriggeringmetabolitesynthesis(Putalunetal.,2007; Caietal.,2012).Inotherculturalexperiments,complexbiological preparationshave alsobeenusedaselicitorswhere the molec-ularstructure of active compound isnot fully known(Radman etal.,2003;Zubeketal.,2012).TheadditionofYEhassuccessfully beenusedincultureandoverproductionofimportant phytocom-poundwasobservedinseveralstudiedplantgenera(Prakashand
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2017.05.008
Srivastava, 2008;Zhao et al., 2010;Cai et al.,2012).The addi-tionof external compounds causesstress in cultivating tissues andimprovesalkaloidbiosynthesis(Elmaghrabietal.,2013;Samar etal.,2015;Diptietal.,2016).Inducedstresshasbeenmeasured bystudyingantioxidantenzymesactivityandotherstressmarkers inculturedtissuesthatoverproduceimportantphyto-compounds (Feher,2015).InthispresentarticleofC.roseus,wetherefore exam-inedtheroleofYEonVBandVCyieldoncultivatedtissues/plants developedfromprotoplast.
Materialandmethods
Plantmaterial
Catharanthusroseus(L.)G.Don,Apocynaceae,seedswere col-lectedfromherbalgarden,HamdardUniversity,NewDelhi, and wasidentifiedby taxonomist(Dr.M.P. Sharma),Department of Botany;thespecimenwasdepositedinDepartmentalarchivefor futurereference.Theseedsweresurface-sterilizedwith0.1%(w/v) HgCl2for2min,rinsedfour-timeswithsterilizeddouble-distilled waterandwereplacedinaconicalflaskcontaining50mlofMS medium(MurashigeandSkoog,1962)withoutorganiccompounds andplant growthregulators(PGR).The seedsweregerminated andtheseedlingsweregrownfor3weeks.Variousexplants(e.g., hypocotyls,leavesandnodalsegments)wereexcisedandcultured onsameMS,amendedwithvariousPGRforcallus/embryogenic induction.Thedetailedprocedurewasdescribedpreviously(Junaid etal.,2006)and wasfollowed.ThemediumpHwaskeptat5.7 beforesterilizationat121◦Ctemperature.Thecultureswerekept inanincubationroomwith25±2◦Cand16-hphotoperiodregime providedbycoolwhitefluorescenttubes(100molm−2s−1).
Protoplastisolationandculture
Protoplastswereisolatedfrom4-day-oldembryogenic suspen-sion.Suspended cells (0.5gfresh weight) were incubatedwith 10mlof enzymesolutioncontaining2% cellulase,1% pectinase, 0.02%(w/v)macerozyme(SigmaAldrich)and0.5%(w/v)driselase (SigmaAldrich)alongwithCaCl2·2H2Oandsorbitol.Themixture waslaterincubated onarotary shaker(50rpm)for 12hunder constantlightconditions at25◦C forliberating protoplasts. Iso-latedprotoplastswereculturedinliquidmediumatadensityof 5×105protoplasts/ml.Protoplastswerepouredintoaconicalflask
containing25ml MS liquidmedium amended withPGR, which
facilitatedprotoplastdivision.
Micro-colony,callus,embryoformationfromprotoplasts
Suspended protoplasts were cultured on medium
supple-mented with appropriate PGR concentrations, i.e. 0.25mg/l l-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 0.50mg/l NAA, 0.25mg/l
2,4-dichlorophenoxyaceticacid(2,4-D),0.50mg/l2,4-D,and combina-tionof0.25mg/lNAA+0.25mg/l2,4-D,0.50mg/lNAA+0.50mg/l 2,4-Dfordevelopingmicrocolonies.Theinducedcolonies trans-formedintocallus,whichlaterconvertedintoembryogeniccallus. The embryogenic calli were placed on MS, added with 1mg/l NAA+1.5mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BA) for differentiation of embryos. Later, protoplasts-derived embryos were cultured in optimizedgibberellicacid(GA3)amendedmedium(1.5mg/l)for embryomaturationandsubsequentgermination/plantrecovery. Theculturedtissuesweresubculturedregularlyatanintervalof4 weeks,unlessmentionedotherwise.
Elicitortreatment
VariousinvitrogrowntissuesweresubjecttoYEtreatments. Four different concentrations of YE (Merck, India) were pre-pared and were designated as: T1=0.5g/l, T2=1g/l, T3=1.5g/l andT4=2g/l.The abovedesignateddoses ofYEwereamended toMSfollowing Darshanieetal.method(1991).AfterYE addi-tion,thepHwasmaintainedat5.7andthemediumwassterilized at15lb(121◦C).Theyieldofalkaloidwasmeasuredatdifferent tissues/embryos,andplantletsoriginatedfromprotoplasts.
QuantificationofVBandVCusinghighperformancethinlayer chromatography
Extraction
TheVBandVCcontentsweremeasuredindifferenttissuesusing standardVBandVC,procuredfromSigma-Aldrich(St.Louis,MO, USA).Select tissues(25 weeksold)were culturedin optimized mediaand wereharvested whenthetissues wereattheirbest growth.Tissuesample(onegram[g],dryweight)wasrefluxedin 30mlofmethanolforabout5–6handtherecoveredsupernatant washeatedat60◦Cuntilthevolumereducedto1–2ml.
Preparationofstocksolutionandcalibrationcurve
OnemgofVBandVCwasdissolvedin1mlofmethanoltomake astocksolutionofconcentration1mgml−1.Fromstocksolution, differentdilutionsweremade(minimumfive)toobtain200,400, 600,800and1000gperbandofstandardandanalyzed indepen-dentlybyHPTLC.Standardcurvewasplottedbetweenpeakarea (y-axis)andconcentration(x-axis).
HPTLCandquantificationindifferentsamples
Pre-coatedThinLayerChromatography(TLC)Aluminiumsheets (20×10cm)withSilicagel(60F254,Merck)wereusedas station-aryphase.Themobilephasewasfreshlyprepared,consistingof toluene,carbinol,acetoneandammoniaintheratioof40:20:80:2. Sampleswereappliedbythehelpof100lmicrosyringe(CAMAG) usingLinomat3(CAMAG)applicator.Aftertheapplicationof sam-ples,thesilicaplateswereairdriedfor10–15minandplacedina developingchamber(TwinthroughChamberCAMAG20×10cm) containingmobile phase. Solventsystemwas allowedtomove upwardsupto85mm.Theplatewasremovedfromthechamber and air dried again for 10–20min. Silica gel plates were
doc-umented by using the Reprostar (CAMAG) in the presence of
UV-light.StationaryphasealongwiththeVBandVCwasscanned byusingtheScanner3(CAMAG).VBwasscannedat280nmand theVCwasscannedat300nm.Alkaloidcontentwasmeasuredas gg−1dryweightbasis.ThepeakofVBandVCwasfixedandthe detectionofthesamealkaloidsinthesampleswascomparedwith thepeaksofstandard.
Antioxidantenzymaticactivity
Freshplantmaterialwashomogenizedin2mlof0.1M com-monextractionbuffer(pH7.5,0.1MK-phosphate,0.5mMEDTA, 1.0mMascorbicacid)andcentrifugedat8608.6×gfor20minat 4◦C.Supernatant(enzymeextract)wastakenforenzymeanalysis andtheactivityofenzymeswasexpressedinEnzymeUnit(EU) mg−1proteinmin−1.
Catalase
0.1mlH2O2.Thereactionwasrunfor3min.Theenzyme activ-itywasexpressedinEUmg−1proteinmin−1.Oneunitofenzyme determinestheamountnecessarytodecompose1molofH2O2 permin.CATactivitywascalculatedbyusingtheco-efficientof absorbance0.036mM−1cm−1.
Superoxidedismutase
ThemethodofDhindsaetal.(1981)wasfollowedwithslight modificationtoestimatesuperoxidedismutase (SOD)activities. Embryos(0.1g) atdifferentdevelopmentalstageswere homog-enized in 2ml of extraction mixture containing 0.5M sodium phosphatebuffer(pH7.3),3mMEDTA,1.0%(w/v) polyvinylpyrolli-done(PVP),1.0%(v/v)TritonX-100,andcentrifugedat8608.6×gat 4◦C.TheSODactivityinthesupernatantwasassayedbyitsability toinhibitthephoto-chemicalreduction.Theassaymixture consist-ingof1.5mlreactionbuffer,0.2mlmethionine,0.1mlofenzyme extractwithequalvolumeof1MNaCO3and2.25mMNitroBlue Tetrazolium(NBT)solution,3mMEDTA,riboflavin,1mlof Milli-poreH2Owastakenintest tubesandincubatedunderlightfor 10min at25◦C. A 50% reduction in colour is oneunit and the enzymeactivitywasexpressedinEUmg−1proteinmin−1.
Ascorbateperoxidase
ThemethoddevelopedbyNakanoandAsada(1981)wasused todeterminetheactivityofascorbateperoxidase(APX).The reac-tionmixturecontained1mlof0.1Msodiumbuffer(pH7.2),0.1ml of EDTAand 0.1ml of tissue extract. Ascorbatewasadded and thereactionwasrunfor3minat25◦C.Ascorbateoxidationwas monitoredspectrophotometrically at 290nm by a reduction of absorbanceandusingtheabsorptioncoefficientof2.8mM−1cm−1. TheactivityofAPXwasexpressedinEUmg−1proteinmin−1.One unitof enzymeistheamountnecessarytodecompose1mof ascorbatepermin.
Glutathionereductase
Theglutathionereductase(GR)activitywasdeterminedbythe methodofFoyerand Halliwell(1976). Theenzymeextractwas rapidlyassayed for theGR activity bytaking 0.1ml of enzyme extractand1mlofreactionbuffer(Tris0.1M/pH7.0,to100ml ofTris0.2mMNADPHand0.5mMGSSGwasadded).Thereaction wasrunfor3minat25◦C.TheGRactivitywascalculatedbyusing theco-efficientofabsorbance6.22mM−1cm−1.TheGRactivitywas determinedthroughglutathione-dependentoxidationofNADPHat 340nm.TheactivityofGRwasexpressedinEUmg−1proteinmin−1. Oneunitofenzymedeterminestheamountnecessaryto decom-pose1molofNADPHpermin.
Statisticalanalysis
ThedataontheeffectsofYEonprotoplastcallus,embryogenesis, alkaloidyieldandonenzymeactivitywereanalyzedbyone-way analysisofvariance(ANOVA)followedbyleastsignificant differ-ence(LSD)test.Valuesareexpressedasmeans±standarderrors ofthreereplicatesoftwoexperiments.Thepresentedmeanvalues wereseparatedusingLSDatp≤0.05level.
Results
Protoplastisolation,callusformation,embryoformationand plantletregeneration
Thehypocotylinducedembryogeniccalluswasusedfor pro-toplast isolation study; this embryogenic callus henceforth is calledas normal embryogeniccallus(NEC). Protoplastisolation wascarriedfromNECsuspensionbyusingvariouswall degrad-ingenzymes.Significantnumbersofprotoplasts(datanotshown
here)wereobtainedontreatmentwithcellulase(2%),pectinase (1%),driselase(0.5%),macerozyme(0.02%)andsorbitol(0.6mM) (Fig.1a).Repeateddivisionsofprotoplastsformedmicro-colonies; andthemaximumnumbersofmicrocolonies/calliwereinduced
on 0.50mg/l NAA+0.50mg/l 2,4-D added medium within 12
weeks ofincubation. Protoplastoriginatedmicro-calli gradually transformedintoembryogeniccalli, calledasprotoplastderived embryogeniccalli(PDEC).The micro-callihad slowgrowth ini-tially, butwithtime thetissues showednormal fastgrowthas thosecultivatedcellsovercamestressgradually,causedbyenzyme mixturesandosmoticumtreatment.Themicro-calliofPDEC ori-ginstartedtoinducesomaticembryoswithin8weeksofculture (inductionstage).InMSembryoproliferationmedium,a hetero-geneous mixture of embryos was formed (proliferation stage). Globular andheart-stageembryosweremorein numbers com-paredtotorpedoandcotyledonaryembryos,whichdifferentiated ingoodnumberslater.Theembryomaturationwasveryhighon 1.5mg/l GA3addedmediumand withtimethematuration per-centageimproved.Theembryosstartedtoregenerateplantsinthe samematurationmedium.Theentireprocessfrom‘protoplastto plantlet’recoverywasachievedthroughsomaticembryogenesis followingembryoinduction,proliferation,maturationandembryo germinationmethods(Fig.2aandd).Thewholeprocesstookabout 40weekstoobtainaplantfromprotoplast.
VBandVCcontent(gg−1dryweight)
The yield of VB and VC was measured in different tissues. ThemobilephaseofstandardsproducedasharpandcompactVB (Rf=0.28)andVC(Rf=0.46)peak(Fig.1aandc,respectively). Scan-ningof VBand VC wasmadeat 280and 300nm,respectively. TheregressionanalysisshowedagoodlinearrelationshipwithVB r=0.999(r2=0.998)and VCr=0.994(r2=0.989)withrespectto peakareaandconcentrationrangeof200–1000gperspot.The regression equationofVBwasY=943.7X+180.0andof VCwas Y=813.5X+1684.
From Tables 1 and 2, it is clear that VB was maximum (9.32gg−1dryweight)ingerminatingembryosandtheyieldwas improved(11.44gg−1dryweight)withYEelicitation,especially inT3treatments.ComparedtoVB,theyieldofVCwaslowand ingerminatingembryos,theyieldwashigh.WithYEelicitation, VCyieldwasfurtherimproved,maximumbeinginT3(3.46gg−1 dry weight). We alsoquantified VBand VCyield in protoplast regeneratedleaves.Invitroleaftissuehadmaximumamountof VBcomparedtoothertissues/embryos.T3(1.5mg/lYE)harvested leaveshadhighestyieldofVB(15.47gg−1 dryweight)andVC (4.14gg−1dryweight),followedbyT4treatment(Fig.1bandd). TheVBandVClevelincreased22.74%and48.49%,respectively,with YEelicitationingerminatingembryosovernon-treatedcontrol tis-sue.
CAT,APX,SODandGRactivities
The addition of elicitors often cause stress in
cultivat-ing tissue we therefore analyzed and compared antioxidant
enzyme activities (CAT, APX, SOD and GR) as an indicator of stress. Protoplast derived embryogenic tissue showed higher
antioxidant enzyme activities compared to normal
embryo-genic tissue as these tissues derived from digestion with wall
degrading enzymes, which caused moderate to severe stress
to cells/tissues. With YE elicitation, the anti-oxidant enzyme activities were further up suggesting extra stress on tissues. Comparedtoembryoinductionandproliferationstages,the
alka-loid yield was high on maturing- and germinating embryos,
Track 1 , ID: ∨inblastine Track 13 , ID: ∨incristine
AU AU AU AU
400 600 500 500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0 450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0 500
400
300
200
100
0 350
300
1
1
1
1 250
200
150
100
0.05 0.25 0.45 0.05 0.25 0.45 0.05 0.25 0.45 0.65 0.05 0.25 0.45 50
0
a
b
c
d
Fig.1.(a)Standardpeakofvinblastine,(b)peakshowingthemaximumyieldofvinblastineinYEtreatedleavesatT3,(c)standardcurveofvincristineand(d)peakshowing themaximumyieldofvincristineinYEtreatedleavesatT3(x-axispresentspeakareaandy-axispresentsRf).
a
b
c
d
Table1
Vinblastine(VB)content(gg−1dryweight)inprotoplastderivedembryos/tissuesinCatharanthusroseus.TissueswereaddedwithdifferenttreatmentsofYE.
Sample Vinblastine(gg−1dryweight)
Induction Proliferation Maturation Germination Leaves(invitro)
C 1.82±0.015d 4.44±0.022e 7.45±0.025e 9.32±0.028e 13.10±0.007d
T1 1.93±0.018c 4.81±0.043d 7.65±0.025d 9.64±0.029d 13.25±0.031c
T2 2.04±0.022b 5.25±0.015c 7.87±0.033c 10.34±0.015c 13.24±0.094c
T3 2.13±0.019a 6.03±0.015a 8.06±0.036a 11.44±0.014a 15.47±0.018a
T4 1.94±0.023c 5.86±0.044b 7.97±0.014b 11.07±0.019b 14.21±0.007b
LSDat5% 0.048 0.426 0.071 0.051 0.108
Valuesareexpressedasmeans±standarderrorsofthreereplicatesoftwoexperiments.Dataweretakenafter6thofculture.Differentsuperscriptletters(a–f)indicate
significanceatp≤0.05levelaccordingtoLSD.T1=0.5mg/l;T2=1.0mg/l;T3=1.5mg/l;andT4=2.0mg/l.C,control,i.e.protoplastderivedembryogenictissue.
Table2
Vincristine(VC)content(gg−1dryweight)inprotoplastderivedembryos/tissuesinCatharanthusroseus.TissueswereaddedwithdifferenttreatmentsofYE.
Sample Vincristine(gg−1dryweight)
Induction Proliferation Maturation Germination Leaves(invitro)
C 0.79±0.058de 1.79±0.011d 2.21±0.047e 2.33±0.014d 3.65±0.022e
T1 0.95±0.018c 2.08±0.022c 2.54±0.018d 2.94±0.025c 3.82±0.011d
T2 1.09±0.027b 2.46±0.029b 2.99±0.018c 3.27±0.011b 3.96±0.022c
T3 1.18±0.011a 2.68±0.018a 3.35±0.016a 3.46±0.016a 4.14±0.015a
T4 0.83±0.025d 2.33±0.011b 3.13±0.015b 3.35±0.015b 4.07±0.011b
LSDat5% 0.068 0.048 0.058 0.281 0.040
Valuesareexpressedasmeans±standarderrorsofthreereplicatesoftwoexperiments.Dataweretakenafter6thofculture.Differentsuperscriptletters(a–f)indicate
significanceatp≤0.05levelaccordingtoLSD.T1=0.5mg/l;T2=1.0mg/l;T3=1.5mg/l;andT4=2.0mg/l.C,control,i.e.protoplastderivedembryogenictissue.
Table3
Enzymeactivities(EUmg−1proteinmin−1)atmaturationstagesofembryo;MSmediumwasaddedwith0.5mg/lGA
3.
Sample CAT APX SOD GR
NEC 1.02±0.025d 0.55±0.018d 2.87±0.018d 0.21±0.014d
C 1.46±0.022c 0.74±0.011c 4.27±0.033c 0.31±0.011c
T3 1.77±0.015b 1.01±0.018b 6.42±0.048b 0.67±0.011b
T4 1.85±0.018a 1.14±0.022a 7.05±0.016a 0.73±0.019a
LSDat5% 0.041 0.033 0.080 0.031
Valuesareexpressedasmeans±standarderrorsofthreereplicatesoftwoexperiments.Dataweretakenafter6thofculture.Differentsuperscriptlettersindicatesignificance
atp≤0.05levelaccordingtoLSD.T3=1.5mg/landT4=2.0mg/l.C,control,i.e.protoplastderivedembryogenictissue;NEC,normalembryogenictissue.
Table4
Enzymeactivities(EUmg−1proteinmin−1)atgerminationstagesofembryos;MSmediumwasaddedwith0.5mg/lBA+0.5mg/lNAA.
Sample CAT APX SOD GR
NEC 1.67±0.018c 0.65±0.015d 3.20±0.011d 0.29±0.018d
C 1.99±0.022a 0.86±0.021c 5.05±0.018c 0.39±0.011c
T3 1.89±0.018b 1.18±0.011b 7.24±0.029b 0.68±0.029b
T4 2.03±0.014a 1.26±0.022a 7.47±0.021a 0.85±0.014a
LSDat5% 0.052 0.045 0.057 0.035
Valuesareexpressedasmeans±standarderrorsofthreereplicatesoftwoexperiments.Dataweretakenafter6thofculture.Differentsuperscriptlettersindicatesignificance
atp≤0.05levelaccordingtoLSD.T3=1.5mg/landT4=2.0mg/l.C,control,i.e.protoplastderivedembryogenictissue;NEC,normalembryogenictissue.
Table5
Enzymeactivities(EUmg−1proteinmin−1)ofinvitroharvestedleaftissues,cultivatedonMS+0.50mg/BA+0.50mg/lNAA.
Sample CAT APX SOD GR
NEC 1.05±0.029d 1.04±0.036d 2.10±0.029d 0.19±0.014d
C 3.27±0.018c 1.57±0.018c 3.15±0.018c 0.29±0.002c
T3 6.02±0.032b 1.96±0.015b 6.06±0.022b 0.52±0.001b
T4 7.52±0.835a 2.09±0.011a 7.06±0.011a 0.62±0.002a
LSDat5% 0.063 0.057 0.039 0.039
Valuesareexpressedasmeans±standarderrorsofthreereplicatesoftwoexperiments.Dataweretakenafter6thofculture.Differentsuperscriptlettersindicatesignificance
atp≤0.05levelaccordingtoLSD.T3=1.5mg/landT4=2.0mg/l.C,control,i.e.protoplastderivedembryogenictissue;NEC,normalembryogenictissue.
in maturing- and germinating embryos, respectively, at high YE (T4) treatment (Tables 3 and 4). The APX activity was alsosimilarly morein maturating-(1.14EUmg−1proteinmin−1) andgerminatingembryos(1.26EUmg−1proteinmin−1).TheSOD
CAT,APX,SODandGRactivities,whichyieldedhighestlevelofVB andVC(Table5).
Discussion
The present study was carried out to investigate the effect ofYEonVBandVCinprotoplast derivedtissues/plantletsinC. roseus.WenotedenhancedyieldofVBandVCinresponsetoYE elicitation.ThereareseveralsimilarreportsonYE-induced syn-thesisoftriterpenoidsandothermetabolitesincultivatedplant tissuessuchasinScutellariabaicalensis(Yoonetal.,2000),Panax ginseng(Luetal.,2001),Centellaasiatica(Kimetal.,2007), Angel-icagigas(Rheeetal.,2010)andPuerariacandollei(Korsangruang etal.,2010).Itisknownthattheplants’responsetopathogenis basedonitsabilitytorecognizesignalmoleculesofforeignagent andthesemoleculesorelicitorsareprimarilyproteinsand/orcell wall-derived oligosaccharides (Neurnberger, 1999; Mahalingam andFedoroff,2003).Elicitorsarecapableofevokingavarietyof plantdefenseresponsesincludingthesynthesisofreactive oxy-genspecies (ROS),thehypersensitiveresponse,thesynthesis of phytoalexin,antimicrobialsecondarycompoundsandother man-ifestationsof defensivenature(Montesanoetal.,2003).Several valuablebioactivecompoundslikeazadirachtin,artemisininand tanshinonesaccumulationwerereportedtobestimulatedbyYE elicitor(Putalunetal.,2007;PrakashandSrivastava,2008;Zhao etal.,2010).Themechanismofelicitationwas,however,variedin differentplantgroupsandinmostcases‘elicitor-receptor’ com-plexwasformedandavastarrayofbiochemicalresponseswere manifested(Radmanetal.,2003;Caietal.,2012).
TheactivitiesofantioxidantenzymessuchasAPX,SODandCAT areoftenusedasmarkerinevaluatingphysiological,biochemical alterationsof plants inresponse tostresses (bioticand abiotic) andinstudieswithplants’systemic acquiredresistancesystem (Tanabeetal.,2008);andtheseenzymeactivityincreaseatthe onsetand increasinglevelsof stress(Renet al.,2002).Inplant systems,themajorROSscavengingmechanismsincludethe activ-ityofSOD,APXandCAT(Mittler,2002).InEuphorbiapekinensis, increasedCATactivityandsynthesisofH2O2werenotedpost elici-tortreatmentincultivatedtissues(Gaoetal.,2011).Theprotoplast derivedtissueshadhighenzymaticactivityandtheactivitywas evenmoreonYEaddedconditions;thisincreasemaybedueto overproductionofROS.InOryzasativacultivar,increased antiox-idativeenzymeactivityscavengedcellularROSsuccessfully and preventedmembraneinjurybyimprovingoxidativestress toler-ance(Hassanein,2000).FoyerandNoctor(2005)notedthatthe enzymeglutathionereductase(GR)–akeyascorbate-glutathione cycleenzyme,helpedmaintainabalanceofGSH/GSSGratioand protected cells from oxidative damage. Current proteomic and molecularanalysessuggestthatSaltOverlySensitive1(SOS1)gene, genesencodingtranscriptionfactors,stressproteins,enzymes cat-alyzingsecondarycompoundsgenesarenotedtobeupregulated bystressorstressinducers(Pazminoetal.,2012;Maetal.,2014). Protoplast derived embryogenic tissue showed an enriched level ofalkaloid, the yield ofVB and VCwaseven more in YE amended conditions. The action of YE was earlier reported to beassociatedwithactivationofterpenoidindolealkaloids(TIA) biosyntheticgenesSTRandTDC encodingstrictosidinesynthase andtryptophandecarboxylaseinbiosynthesisofalkaloids(Pauw etal.,2004).Asemi-syntheticmethodofchemicalorenzymatic couplingofmonomericindolealkaloidsvindolineand catharan-thinein formingvinblastine wassuccessfullymade inprevious studies(Goodbodyetal.,1988;Kutney,1990)inwhichperoxidase catalyzedcouplingreactionstepofsynthesis(Smithetal.,2003). Inthispresentstudy,weobservedincreasedenzymeactivityon applicationofYEthatmighttriggerenhancedlevelofVBandVC
synthesisinculture.Abrahametal.(2011)studiedYEeffectin Cur-cumamanggaandhigherantioxidantenzymeactivitywasnoted tobedue toenrichedlevel ofphenolicaccumulationintissues. Thecorrelationbetweenaccumulatedphenoliclevelswithradical scavengingwasearliernotedindifferentberryspeciesandthus, theantioxidantenzymeactivitiesandthesynthesisofsecondary metaboliteareconsideredtobeinvariablyrelated(Amakuraetal., 2000).In Catharanthus,there is enrichmentof alkaloids,sothe studyisimportantasitistheonlysourceofexpensive,important chemotherapeuticdrugs withanti-cancerousactivity,whichare presentinaverytrace(0.0005%DW)amount(SchmellerandWink, 1998).Thesynthesisofrosmaricacid(RA)andphenoliccompounds inSalviamiltiorrhizahairyrootswassimilarlystimulatedbyYEand Ag+,anabioticelicitor(Qiongetal.,2006).Thebioticandabiotic elicitorinduced(YEandMJ)RAaccumulationwasobservedinother investigatedplantssuchasOrthosiphonaristatus(Mizukametal., 1992)andColeusblumei(Szaboetal.,1999).InL.erythrorhizon,the additionofYEinsuspensionrapidlyandtransientlyenhancedRA accumulation(Ogataetal.,2004).Sanchez-Sampedroetal.(2005) reportedabout three-foldproduction of silymarin followingYE treatmentinSilybummarianum.TheamendmentofYEat0.5g/l wasfoundtobeanoptimumtreatmentforelicitationinGymnema sylvestreinwhich over5.25foldsof gymnemicacidproduction wasnotedwithin20daysofculture(Veerashreeetal.,2012).Over 113.3%increaseintotalphenoliccontentovercontrolwasreported in YE treated cells in Astragalus chrysochlorus (Ozgur and Sule, 2009).Inourstudy,enrichedVBandVCalkaloidyieldwasnoticed onYEtreatmentsand1.5g/lwasobservedtobetheoptimumdose. YEcontainsseveralcomponentslikechitin,N-acetylglucosamine oligomers,-glucan,glycopeptidesandergosterol(Boller,1995) butthespecificfractiontriggersthesynthesisofalkaloidsisstill notelucidatedclearly. Thepeptideandpolysaccharidemoieties presentinYEhavebeensuggestedtobethemoleculesof stimulat-ingnature(Menkeetal.,1999;Zhaoetal.,2011).Theprotoplasts and theprotoplast derived tissues showedstress as this tissue underwentadversecellularconditions,causedbywalldegrading enzymes,PGRsandinflux/effluxofrequiredions.Theadditionof YEinmediummayraisestresslevelfurther(aswasevidencedfrom increasinglevelsofstressmarkerenzymes)thatmayhelpin syn-thesizingenhancedlevelofVBandVCinculturedtissues.Thisis thefirsteverstudyofsystematicmonitoringofVBandVCin proto-plastregeneratedtissuesinCatharanthusunderYEinfluence.This studymaycomplementtoothereffortsaimingtoenrichVBandVC yieldinculture.
Conclusion
ThisisthefirstreportontheeffectofYEonVBandVCyieldin protoplastregeneratedplantsinC.roseus.Theobservationsuggests that YE efficiently enhanced alkaloid yield however, the accu-mulationwastreatment-specific.Theidentificationofsignalling componentofYEinbiosynthesiscouldbeaveryeffectiveapproach forlargescale augmentationofalkaloidyieldofpharmaceutical importance.
Authorship
Thefirstauthorconceivedtheideaandperformedmostofthe experimentsandthesecondauthoreditedthemanuscript.
Conflictsofinterest
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to University Grant Commission, India, for receivingfinancialassistance.WearealsothankfultoDepartment ofBotany,Central InstrumentationFacility,HamdardUniversity (JamiaHamdard)forprovidingotherfacilities.
References
Abraham,F.,Bhatt,A.,Keng,C.L.,Indrayanto,G.,Sulaiman,S.F.,2011.Effectofyeast extractandchitosanonshootproliferation,morphologyandantioxidantactivity ofCurcumamanggainvitroplantlets.Afr.J.Biotechnol.10,7787–7795. Aebi,H.,1984.Catalaseinvitro.MethodsEnzymol.105,121–126.
Amakura,Y.,Umino,Y.,Tsuji,S.,Tongai,Y.,2000.Influenceofjamprocessingonthe radicalscavengingactivityandphenoliccontentinberries.J.Agric.FoodChem. 48,6292–6297.
Boller,T.,1995.Chemoperceptionofmicrobialsignalsinplantcells.Annu.Rev.Plant Physiol.PlantMol.Biol.46,189–214.
Cai,Z.,Kastell,A.,Mewis,I.,Knorr,D.,Smetanska,I.,2012.Polysaccharide elici-torsenhanceanthocyaninandphenolicacidaccumulationincellsuspension culturesofVitisvinifera.PlantCellTissueOrg.Cult.108,401–409.
Darshanie,P.,Rajapakse,Mendis,M.H.,Jayawardene,S.D.G.,1991.Establishmentof calluscultureinBg-94-1:acommerciallycultivatedriceinSriLanka.J.Nat.Sci. Coun.SriLanka19,163–170.
DeLuca,V.,StPierre,B.,2000.Thecellanddevelopmentalbiologyofalkaloid biosyn-thesis.TrendsPlantSci.5,168–173.
Dhindsa,R.H.,Plumb-Dhindsa,P.,Thorpe,T.A.,1981.Leafsenescencecorrelatedwith increasedlevelofmembranepermeability,lipidperoxidationanddecreased levelofSODandCAT.J.Exp.Bot.32,93–101.
Dipti,T.,Mujib,A.,Maqsood,M.,Ali,M.,Zafar,N.,2016.Aspergillusflavusfungus elic-itationimprovesvincristineandvinblastineyieldbyaugmentingcallusbiomass growthinCatharanthusroseus.PlantCellTissueOrg.Cult.126,291–303. Elmaghrabi,A.M.,Ochatt,S.,Rogers,H.J.,Francis,D.,2013.Enhancedtoleranceto
salinityfollowingcellularacclimationtoincreasingNaCllevelsinMedicago truncatula.PlantCellTissueOrg.Cult.114,61–70.
Feher,A.,2015.Somaticembryogenesis–stress-inducedremodelingofplantcell fate.Biochim.Biophys.Acta1849,385–402.
Foyer,C.,Noctor,G.,2005.Oxidant andantioxidantsignaling inplants:a re-evaluationoftheconceptofoxidativestressinaphysiologicalcontext.Plant CellEnviron.28,1056–1071.
Foyer,C.H.,Halliwell,B.,1976.Thepresenceofglutathioneandglutathione reduc-taseinchloroplasts:aproposedroleinascorbicacidmetabolism.Planta133, 21–25.
Gao,F.,Ying-hui,Y.,Chuan-chao,D.,2011.Effectsofendophyticfungalelicitor ontwokindsofterpenoidsproductionandphysiologicalindexesinEuphorbia pekinensissuspensioncells.J.Med.PlantsRes.5,4418–4425.
Goodbody, A.E., Endo, T., Vukovic, J., Kutney, J.P., Choi, L.S.L., Misawa, M., 1988. Enzymic coupling of catharanthine and vindoline to form 3␣,4␣-anhydrovinblastinebyhorseradishperoxidase.PlantaMed.54,136–140. Hassanein,A.A.,2000.Physiologicalresponsesinducedbyshockandgradual
salin-izationinrice(OryzasativaL.)seedlingsandthepossiblerolesplayedby glutathionetreatment.Acta.Bot.Hung.42,139–159.
Ibrahim,I.A.,AbdElKawi,M.,Nower,A.,AbdelMotaal,A.,AbdElAal,A.,2009. AlkaloidproductionandorganogenesisfromcallusofHyoscyamusmuticusL.in vitro.J.App.Sci.Res.5,82–92.
Junaid,A.,Bhat,M.A.,Mujib,A.,Sharma,M.P.,2006.Somaticembryoproliferation, maturationandgerminationinCatharanthusroseus.PlantCellTissueOrg.Cult. 84,325–332.
Kim,O.T.,Bang,K.H.,Shin,Y.S.,Lee,M.J.,Jung,S.J.,Hyun,D.Y.,Kim,Y.C.,Seong,N.S., Cha,S.W.,Hwang,B.,2007.Enhancedproductionofasiaticosidefromhairyroot culturesofCentellaasiatica(L.)Urbanelicitedbymethyljasmonate.PlantCell Rep.26,1941–1949.
Korsangruang, S., Soonthornchareonnon, N., Chintapakorn, Y., Saralamp, P., Prathanturarug,S.,2010.Effectsofabioticandbioticelicitorsongrowthand isoflavonoidaccumulationinPuerariacandolleivar.candolleiandP.candollei var.mirificacellsuspensioncultures.PlantCellTissueOrg.Cult.103,333–342. Kuboyama,T.,Yokoshima,S.,Tokuyama,H.,Fukuyama,T.,2004.Stereocontrolled
totalsynthesisof(+)vincristine.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.101,11966–11970. Kutney,J.P.,1990.Biosynthesisandsynthesisofindolealkaloidsinplantcell
cul-tures:apersonaloverview.Nat.Prod.Rep.7,85–103.
Kutney,J.P.,Choi,L.S.L.,Nakano,J.,Tsukamoto,H.,Boulet,C.A.,McHugh,M.,1991. Processofsynthesisofvinblastineandvincristine.USPatent5047528. Lu,M.B.,Wong,H.L.,Teng,W.L.,2001.Effectsofelicitationontheproductionof
saponinincellcultureofPanaxginseng.PlantCellRep.20,674–677. Ma,Q.,Ding,Y.,Chang,J.,Sun,X.,Zhang,L.,Wei,Q.,Cheng,Y.,Chen,L.,Xu,J.,Deng,X.,
2014.Comprehensiveinsightsonhow2,4-dichlorophenoxyaceticacidretards senescenceinpost-harvestcitrusfruitsusingtranscriptomicandproteomic approaches.J.Exp.Bot.65,61–74.
Mahalingam,R.,Fedoroff,N.,2003.Stressresponse,celldeathandsignalling:the manyfacesofreactiveoxygenspecies.Physiol.Plant119,56–68.
Menke,F.L.H.,Parchmann,S.,Mueller,M.J.,Kijne,J.W.,Memelink,J.,1999. Involve-mentoftheoctadecanoidpathwayand proteinphosphorylationinfungal
elicitorinducedexpressionofterpenoidindolealkaloidbiosyntheticgenesin Catharanthusroseus.PlantPhysiol.119,1289–1296.
Mittler,R.,2002.Oxidativestress,antioxidantsandstresstolerance.TrendsPlant Sci.7,405–410.
Mizukam,H.T.,Ogawa,H.,Ohashi,B.,Ellis,E.,1992.Inductionofrosmarinicacid biosynthesisinLithospermumerythrorhizoncellsuspensionculturesbyyeast extract.PlantCellRep.11,480–483.
Montesano,M.,Brander,G.,Tapio,P.E.,2003.Pathogenderivedelicitors:searching forreceptorsinplants.Mol.PlantPathol.4,73–79.
Moreno,P.R.H.,VanderHeijden,R.,Verpoorte,R.,1995.Cellandtissueculturesof Catharanthusroseus:aliteraturesurveyII.Updatingfrom1998to1993.Plant CellTissueOrg.Cult.42,1–25.
Moreno,P.R.H.,(Ph.Dthesis)1995.Influenceofstressfactorsonthesecondary metabolisminsuspensionculturedCatharanthusroseuscells.LeidenUniversity, Leiden.
Mujib,A.,Ilah,A.,Aslam,J.,Fatima,S.,Siddiqui,Z.H.,Maqsood,M.,2012.Catharanthus roseusalkaloids:applicationofbiotechnologyforimprovingyield.PlantGrowth Reg.68,111–127.
Mukherjee,A.K.,Basu,S.,Sarkar,N.,Ghosh,A.C.,2001.Advancesincancertherapy withplantbasednaturalproducts.Curr.Med.Chem.8,1467–1486.
Murashige,T.,Skoog,F.,1962.Arevisedmediumforrapidgrowthandbioassaywith tobaccotissuecultures.Physiol.Plant15,473–497.
Murthy,H.N.,Lee,E.J.,Paek,K.Y.,2014.Productionofsecondarymetabolitesfrom cellandorgancultures:strategiesandapproachesforbiomassimprovement andmetaboliteaccumulation.PlantCellTissueOrg.Cult.118,1–16.
Mustafa,N.R.,Kim,H.K.,Choi,Y.H.,Erkelens,C.,Lefeber,A.W.,Spijksma,G.,Vander Heijden,R.,Verpoorte,R.,2009.Biosynthesisofsalicylicacidinfunguselicited Catharanthusroseuscells.Phytochemistry70,532–539.
Naz,R.,Anis,M.,Aref,M.I.,2015.Managementofcytokinin-auxininteractionsfor invitroshootproliferationofAlthaeaofficinalisL.:avaluablemedicinalplant. Rend.Fis.Acc.Lincei.26,323–334.
Nakano,Y.,Asada,K.,1981.Hydrogenperoxideisscavengedbyascorbate-specific peroxidaseinspinachchloroplasts.PlantCellPhysiol.22,867–880.
Neurnberger,T.,1999.Signalperceptioninplantpathogendefense.Cell.Mol.Life Sci.55,167–182.
Ogata,A.,Tsuruga,A.,Matsunob,M.,Mizukami,H.,2004.Elicitor-inducedrosmarinic acidbiosynthesisinLithospermumerythrorhizoncellsuspensioncultures: activ-itiesofrosmarinicacidsynthaseandthefinaltwocytochromeP450-catalyzed hydroxylations.PlantBiotechnol.2,393–396.
Ozgur, C., Sule, A., 2009. Defensive and secondary metabolism in Astragalus chrysochloruscellculturesinresponsetoyeastextractstressor.J.Environ.Biol. 30,51–55.
Pauw,B.,Duijn,B.,Kijne,J.W.,Memelink,J.,2004.Activationoftheoxidativeburstby yeastelicitorinCatharanthusroseuscellsoccursindependentlyoftheactivation ofgenesinvolvedinalkaloidbiosynthesis.PlantMol.Biol.55,797–805. Pazmino,D.M.,Romero-Puertas,M.C.,Sandalio,L.M.,2012.Insightsintothe
differ-entialresponseofwoundandleavestoherbicides2,4-dichlorophenooxyacetic acidinpeaplants:roleofreactiveoxygenspecies. PlantSignal.Behav.7, 425–427.
Prakash,G.,Srivastava,A.K.,2008.Statisticalelicitoroptimizationstudiesforthe enhancementofazadirachtinproductioninbioreactorAzadirachtaindicacell cultivation.Biochem.Eng.J.40,218–226.
Putalun,W.,Luealon,W.,De-Eknamkul,W.,Tanaka,H.,Shoyama,Y.,2007. Improve-mentofartemisininproductionbychitosaninhairyrootculturesofArtemisia annua.Biotechnol.Lett.29,1143–1146.
Qiong,Y.,Ming,S.,Janet,N.,Jian,Y.W.,2006.Elicitor-inducedrosmarinicacid accu-mulationandsecondarymetabolismenzymeactivitiesinSalviamiltiorrhiza hairyroots.PlantSci.170,853–858.
Radman,R.,Saez,T.,Bucke,C.,Keshavarz,T.,2003.Elicitationofplantsandmicrobial cellsystems.Biotechnol.Appl.Biochem.37,91–102.
Ren,A.Z.,Gao,Y.B.,Liu,S.,2002.ResponseofsomeprotectiveenzymesinBrassica chinensisseedlingtoPb++,Cd+andCr+++stress.Chin.J.Appl.Ecol.13,510–512. Rhee,H.S.,Cho,H.Y.,Son,S.Y.,Yoon,S.Y.H.,Park,J.M.,2010.Enhancedaccumulation ofdecursinanddecursinolangelateinrootculturesandintactrootsofAngelica gigasNakaifollowingelicitation.PlantCellTissueOrg.Cult.101,295–302. Samar,F.,Mujib,A.,Dipti,T.,2015.NaClamendmentimprovesvinblastineand
vin-cristinesynthesisinCatharanthusroseus:acaseofstresssignallingasevidenced byantioxidantenzymesactivities.PlantCellTissueOrg.Cult.121,445–458. Sanchez-Sampedro,M.A.,Fernandez-Tarrago,J.,Corchete,P.,2005.Yeastextract
andmethyljasmonate-inducedsilymarinproductionincellculturesofSilybum marianum(L.)Gaertn.J.Biotechnol.119,60–69.
Schmeller,T.,Wink,M.,1998. Utilizationofalkaloidsinmodernmedicine.In: Roberts,M.F.,Wink,M.(Eds.),Alkaloids,Biochemistry,EcologyandMedicinal Applications.PlenumPress,NewYork,pp.435–459.
Smith, J.I., Amouzou, E., Yamaguchi, A., 2003. Peroxidase from bioreactor cultivatedCatharanthusroseuscellculturesmediatesbiosynthesisof␣-3′,4′ -anhydrovinblastine.Biotechnol.Appl.Biochem.10,568–575.
Szabo,E.,Thelen,A.,Petersen,M.,1999.Fungalelicitorpreparationsandmethyl jas-monateenhancerosmarinicacidaccumulationinsuspensionculturesofColeus blumei.PlantCellRep.18,485–489.
Tanabe,S.,Hayashi,N.,Nishizawa,Y.,Yamane,H.,Shibuya,N.,Minami,E.,2008. Elicitorandcalatalseactivityofconidiasuspensionsofvariousstrainsof Mag-naporthegriseainsuspension-culturedcellsofrice.Biosci.Biotechnol.Biochem. 72,889–892.
Valluri,J.V.,2009.Bioreactorproductionofsecondarymetabolitesfromcellcultures ofperiwinkleandsandalwood.MethodsMol.Biol.54,325–335.
VanDerHeijden,R.,Jacobs,D.I.,Snoeijer,W.,Hallared,D.,Verpoorte,R.,2004.The Catharanthusalkaloids:pharmacognosyandbiotechnology.Curr.Med.Chem. 11,607–628.
Veerashree,V.,Anuradha,C.M.,Kumar,V.,2012.Elicitor-enhancedproductionof gymnemicacidincellsuspensionculturesofGymnemasylvestreR.Br.PlantCell TissueOrg.Cult.108,27–35.
Verpoorte,R.,Contin,A.,Memelink,J.,2002.Biotechnologyfortheproductionof plantsecondarymetabolites.Phytochem.Rev.1,13–25.
Yoon,J.H.,Kim,K.H.,Ma,J.C.,Huh,H.,2000.Inducedaccumulationoftriterpenoids inScutellariabaicalensissuspensionculturesusingayeastelicitor.Biotechnol. Lett.22,1071–1075.
Zarate,R.,Verpoorte,R.,2007.Strategiesforthegeneticmodificationofthe medic-inalplantCatharanthusroseus(L.)G.Don.Phytochem.Rev.6,475–491. Zhao,J.,Zhou,L.,Wu,J.,2010.Effectsofbioticandabioticelicitorsoncellgrowth
andtanshinoneaccumulationinSalviamiltiorrhizacellcultures.Appl.Microbiol. Biotechnol.87,137–144.
Zhao,J.,Zheng,B.,Li,Y.,Shan,T.,Mou,Y.,Lu,S.,Li,P.,Zhou,L.,2011.Enhancement ofDiepoxinproductionbyyeastextractanditsfractionsinliquidculture ofBerkleasmium-likeendophyticfungusDzf12fromDioscoreazingiberensis. Molecules16,847–856.