• Nenhum resultado encontrado

SCARB2 mutations as modifiers in Gaucher disease: the wrong enzyme at the wrong place?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "SCARB2 mutations as modifiers in Gaucher disease: the wrong enzyme at the wrong place?"

Copied!
34
0
0

Texto

(1)

SCARB2

MUTATIONS AS

MODIFIERS

IN

GAUCHER DISEASE:

the wrong enzyme at the wrong place?

C O U T I N H O M F

1

, L A C E R D A L

2

, G A S PA R A

3

, P I N T O E

2

, R I B E I R O I

2

, L A R A N J E I R A

F

2

, R I B E I R O H

2

, S I LV A E

2

, F E R R E I R A C

2

, P R ATA M J

4 , 5

, A LV E S S

1

15th

International Symposium

(2)

Gaucher Disease

(GD)

Autosomal recessive

Lysosomal Storage Disorder

Deficient enzyme:

β-glucocerebrosidase

(Gcase)

Gene:

GBA

(1q21)

Atypical form:

Deficient enzyme:

Saposin C

Gene: PSAP

(10q21-q22)

Original illustration by Marcos Bernardino for Cristiana Petriz´s “Gigi e a Doença de Gaucher”, 2010

(3)

Gaucher Disease

(GD)

Autosomal recessive

Lysosomal Storage Disorder

Deficient enzyme:

β-glucocerebrosidase

(Gcase)

Gene:

GBA

(1q21)

Large spectrum of severity

& symptoms

Original illustration by Marcos Bernardino for Cristiana Petriz´s “Gigi e a Doença de Gaucher”, 2010

(4)

Gaucher Disease

(GD)

Autosomal recessive

Lysosomal Storage Disorder

Deficient enzyme:

β-glucocerebrosidase

(Gcase)

Gene:

GBA

(1q21)

At the clinical level…

3 variants

based on the presence

of

neuronopathic disease

abscence

(5)

Gaucher Disease

(GD)

Autosomal recessive

Lysosomal Storage Disorder

Deficient enzyme:

β-glucocerebrosidase

(Gcase)

Gene:

GBA

(1q21)

At the clinical level…

3 variants

Non-Neurological

Neurological

GD type

1

2

3

(6)

Gaucher Disease

(GD)

Autosomal recessive

Lysosomal Storage Disorder

Deficient enzyme:

β-glucocerebrosidase

(Gcase)

Gene:

GBA

(1q21)

At the clinical level…

3 variants

Genotyope-Phenotype correlations

(7)

Gaucher Disease

(GD)

Autosomal recessive

Lysosomal Storage Disorder

Deficient enzyme:

β-glucocerebrosidase

(Gcase)

Gene:

GBA

(1q21)

One of the

most frequent LSD

Available ERT

Original illustration by Marcos Bernardino for Cristiana Petriz´s “Gigi e a Doença de Gaucher”, 2010

(8)

Gaucher Disease

(GD)

“The prototype lysosomal disease…”

(

Zhao and Grabowski, 2002

)

1

st

described

1

st

drug approved

> nr therapeutic approaches

Original illustration by Marcos Bernardino for Cristiana Petriz´s “Gigi e a Doença de Gaucher”, 2010

(9)

Gaucher Disease

(GD)

“The prototype lysosomal disease…”

(

Zhao and Grabowski, 2002

)

Still…

it does have some

significant differences

Original illustration by Marcos Bernardino for Cristiana Petriz´s “Gigi e a Doença de Gaucher”, 2010

(10)

At the populational level…

GBA mutation carriers

Parkinson’s disease

(11)

Gaucher Disease

(GD)

GCase

(12)

Gaucher Disease

(GD)

GCase

(13)

Gaucher Disease

(GD)

GCase

At the molecular level…

LIMP2

Gene:

SCARB2

Action myoclonus-renal failure

(14)

Gaucher Disease

(GD)

GCase

At the molecular level…

LIMP2

Gene:

SCARB2

Variation in this gene may account

for

GD phenotype

(15)

Gaucher Disease

(GD)

GCase

At the molecular level…

LIMP2

Gene:

SCARB2

Variation in this gene may account

for

GD phenotype

(16)

Objective

Understand the role of

variations

in

SCARB2

in the

broad

phenotype spectrum

observed for GD patients

(17)

Sample Collection

Portuguese

GD cohort

91

samples

Biochemically

molecularly

characterized GD patients,

diagnosed at CGMJM

from ? to 2013

+

Controls

50 samples

(18)

Genetic analysis

Sanger sequencing

12

SCARB2

exons +

intronic bounderies

Intron 1 Intron 2 Intron 3

Exon 1 Exon 2 Exon 3 Exon 4

Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 19 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Normal transcript Mutant transcripts Alu-Sz element 62 bp of intron 18 (a) (b) (c1) (3) (2) Exon 18 Exon 20

C

A

Gg

c

a

c

g

t

(c2) 5’ss GC Alu-Sz element

CA

GG

C

T

G

A C

T

C 5’ss GC 5’ss flanking sequence fitting the parameters described by Sorek et al., 2004 for Alu exonization

Alu element

5’ UTR Intron 4 Intron 5 Intron 6 Intron 7

Exon 5 Exon 6 Exon 7 Exon 8

Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 19 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Normal transcript Mutant transcripts Alu-Sz element 62 bp of intron 18 (a) (b) (c1) (3) (2) Exon 18 Exon 20

C

A

Gg

c

a

c

g

t

(c2) 5’ss GC Alu-Sz element

CA

GG

C

T

G

A C

T

C 5’ss GC 5’ss flanking sequence fitting the parameters described by Sorek et al., 2004 for Alu exonization

Alu element

Intron 8 Intron 9 Intron 10 Intron 11

Exon 9 Exon 10 Exon 11 Exon 12

Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 19 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Normal transcript Mutant transcripts Alu-Sz element 62 bp of intron 18 (a) (b) (c1) (3) (2) Exon 18 Exon 20

C

A

Gg

c

a

c

g

t

(c2) 5’ss GC Alu-Sz element

CA

GG

C

T

G

A C

T

C 5’ss GC 5’ss flanking sequence fitting the parameters described by Sorek et al., 2004 for Alu exonization

Alu element

Intron 12

In silico analyses

Evaluation of the

deleterious potential

of the novel variant(s)

DNA

Peripheral blood

(19)

Results

Intron 1 Intron 2 Intron 3

Exon 1 Exon 2 Exon 3 Exon 4

Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 19 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Normal transcript Mutant transcripts Alu-Sz element 62 bp of intron 18 (a) (b) (c1) (3) (2) Exon 18 Exon 20

C

A

Gg

c

a

c

g

t

(c2) 5’ss GC Alu-Sz element

CA

GG

C

T

G

A C

T

C 5’ss GC 5’ss flanking sequence fitting the parameters described by Sorek et al., 2004 for Alu exonization

Alu element

5’ UTR Intron 4 Intron 5 Intron 6 Intron 7

Exon 5 Exon 6 Exon 7 Exon 8

Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 19 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Normal transcript Mutant transcripts Alu-Sz element 62 bp of intron 18 (a) (b) (c1) (3) (2) Exon 18 Exon 20

C

A

Gg

c

a

c

g

t

(c2) 5’ss GC Alu-Sz element

CA

GG

C

T

G

A C

T

C 5’ss GC 5’ss flanking sequence fitting the parameters described by Sorek et al., 2004 for Alu exonization

Alu element

Intron 8 Intron 9 Intron 10 Intron 11

Exon 9 Exon 10 Exon 11 Exon 12

Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 19 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Normal transcript Mutant transcripts Alu-Sz element 62 bp of intron 18 (a) (b) (c1) (3) (2) Exon 18 Exon 20

C

A

Gg

c

a

c

g

t

(c2) 5’ss GC Alu-Sz element

CA

GG

C

T

G

A C

T

C 5’ss GC 5’ss flanking sequence fitting the parameters described by Sorek et al., 2004 for Alu exonization

Alu element Intron 12

N

o

n

-co

d

in

g

vari

an

ts

rs3733259

rs894248

rs2289512

rs2289513

rs35369082

rs77814624

rs35583533

Registered polymorphisms

(20)

Results

Intron 1 Intron 2 Intron 3

Exon 1 Exon 2 Exon 3 Exon 4

Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 19 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Normal transcript Mutant transcripts Alu-Sz element 62 bp of intron 18 (a) (b) (c1) (3) (2) Exon 18 Exon 20

C

A

Gg

c

a

c

g

t

(c2) 5’ss GC Alu-Sz element

CA

GG

C

T

G

A C

T

C 5’ss GC 5’ss flanking sequence fitting the parameters described by Sorek et al., 2004 for Alu exonization

Alu element

5’ UTR Intron 4 Intron 5 Intron 6 Intron 7

Exon 5 Exon 6 Exon 7 Exon 8

Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 19 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Normal transcript Mutant transcripts Alu-Sz element 62 bp of intron 18 (a) (b) (c1) (3) (2) Exon 18 Exon 20

C

A

Gg

c

a

c

g

t

(c2) 5’ss GC Alu-Sz element

CA

GG

C

T

G

A C

T

C 5’ss GC 5’ss flanking sequence fitting the parameters described by Sorek et al., 2004 for Alu exonization

Alu element

Intron 8 Intron 9 Intron 10 Intron 11

Exon 9 Exon 10 Exon 11 Exon 12

Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 19 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Normal transcript Mutant transcripts Alu-Sz element 62 bp of intron 18 (a) (b) (c1) (3) (2) Exon 18 Exon 20

C

A

Gg

c

a

c

g

t

(c2) 5’ss GC Alu-Sz element

CA

GG

C

T

G

A C

T

C 5’ss GC 5’ss flanking sequence fitting the parameters described by Sorek et al., 2004 for Alu exonization

Alu element Intron 12

p.M159V

p.V396I

Co

d

in

g

vari

an

ts

known polymorphic variations

(21)

Results

Intron 1 Intron 2 Intron 3

Exon 1 Exon 2 Exon 3 Exon 4

Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 19 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Normal transcript Mutant transcripts Alu-Sz element 62 bp of intron 18 (a) (b) (c1) (3) (2) Exon 18 Exon 20

C

A

Gg

c

a

c

g

t

(c2) 5’ss GC Alu-Sz element

CA

GG

C

T

G

A C

T

C 5’ss GC 5’ss flanking sequence fitting the parameters described by Sorek et al., 2004 for Alu exonization

Alu element

5’ UTR Intron 4 Intron 5 Intron 6 Intron 7

Exon 5 Exon 6 Exon 7 Exon 8

Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 19 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Normal transcript Mutant transcripts Alu-Sz element 62 bp of intron 18 (a) (b) (c1) (3) (2) Exon 18 Exon 20

C

A

Gg

c

a

c

g

t

(c2) 5’ss GC Alu-Sz element

CA

GG

C

T

G

A C

T

C 5’ss GC 5’ss flanking sequence fitting the parameters described by Sorek et al., 2004 for Alu exonization

Alu element

Intron 8 Intron 9 Intron 10 Intron 11

Exon 9 Exon 10 Exon 11 Exon 12

Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 18 Exon 19 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 20 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Exon 21 Normal transcript Mutant transcripts Alu-Sz element 62 bp of intron 18 (a) (b) (c1) (3) (2) Exon 18 Exon 20

C

A

Gg

c

a

c

g

t

(c2) 5’ss GC Alu-Sz element

CA

GG

C

T

G

A C

T

C 5’ss GC 5’ss flanking sequence fitting the parameters described by Sorek et al., 2004 for Alu exonization

Alu element Intron 12

p.T398M

Co

d

in

g

vari

an

ts

Novel coding variant

not detected in 50 controls

(22)

In silico analyses

(23)

Reassessment

of the

clinical case

Symptoms’ onset:

7 months

Disease progression:

severe anemia;

poor facial mimic;

stridor;

thrombocytopenia;

cardiomegaly;

marked splenomegaly;

interstitial lung disease with multiple recurrent infections;

bilateral convergent strabismus;

marked axial hypotonia

global psychomotor developmental delay

2

nd

child of young parents

healthy

unrelated

(24)

Symptoms’ onset:

7 months

Disease progression:

severe anemia;

poor facial mimic;

stridor;

thrombocytopenia;

cardiomegaly;

marked splenomegaly;

interstitial lung disease with multiple recurrent infections;

bilateral convergent strabismus;

marked axial hypotonia

global psychomotor developmental delay

2

nd

child of young parents

healthy

unrelated

Cape Verdean origin

Neurological GD

(25)

Reassessment

of the

clinical case

Symptoms’ onset:

7 months

Disease progression:

severe anemia;

poor facial mimic;

stridor;

thrombocytopenia;

cardiomegaly;

marked splenomegaly;

interstitial lung disease with multiple recurrent infections;

bilateral convergent strabismus;

marked axial hypotonia

global psychomotor developmental delay

2

nd

child of young parents

healthy

unrelated

Cape Verdean origin

(26)

Reassessment

of the

GBA genotype

Genotype:

L444P/L444P

Common mutation

Known genotype-phenotype correlation

2

nd

child of young parents

healthy

unrelated

Cape Verdean origin

(27)

p.T398M: GD modulator?

Still…

therapeutic follow-up with assessment of

chitotriosidase

levels

enzyme levels disparate from the ones

expected for a GD patient under ERT

low response to treatment?

No conclusions

can be drawn by the analysis of the

phenotype

alone

(28)

A LOOK FORWARD…

Functional studies

Western Blot

Real time PCR

Immunofluorescence

GCase activity assay

(29)

A LOOK FORWARD…

Functional studies

Western Blot

Real time PCR

Immunofluorescence

GCase activity assay

p.T398M

dysfunction

or

r

ed

uc

tion

of

LIMP-2

levels

Lower receptor density

key factor for

recombinant GCase uptake

(30)

A LOOK FORWARD…

Parkinson’s disease

Dementia with Lewy Bodies

SCARB2

screening

Portuguese cohort

(31)

A LOOK FORWARD…

Parkinson’s disease

Dementia with Lewy Bodies

SCARB2

screening

Portuguese cohort

(32)

SUMMARY

1

st

time a

whole GD population

is screened for

SCARB2

mutations;

SCARB2 variability does

not account much to the

Portuguese GD phenotypic spectrum

Still,

one novel variant here identified

(p.T398M)

, deserves further attention and

extra studies

Plenty of questions remain unanswered…

(33)

Acknowledgments

Dr. Sandra Alves

Prof. Mª João Prata

UID-SA, DHG, INSA

Biochemical Genetics Unit, CGMJM, CHP

PTDC/SAU-GMG/102889/2008

SFRH/BD/124372/2016

(34)

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Direito à cidade, plano diretor e gestão participativa: O caso-referência de Paraty / Ananda Barros de Matos; Orientadora: Rosângela Lunardelli Cavallazzi – Rio de Janeiro:

O artigo descreveu o desenvolvimento do DC Alerta, um sistema de monitoramento da temperatura e umidade para data centers através de uma rede de objetos que constitui a

Desde a sua implantação, o Fome Zero sofreu críticas contundentes por parte da mídia, da oposição e de formadores de opinião. As principais críticas presentes nas

Por meio desse raciocínio, se o texto grego passou, hipoteticamente, do oral para o escrito; o brasileiro (ao contrário e a julgar por sinalizações do autor em cartas, entrevistas e

Note- se, finalmente, que chamamos ao verso vernáculo usado nesta nossa tradução de Juvenal “hexâmetro português” por mera convenção – isto é, cientes de que, em

sí mismo (fragmento 48-49) y que la ciencia consiste en el conocimiento de esto último y no de imitaciones, para luego concluir que Aristóteles tuvo que haber defendido en este

A última pergunta deste questionário deveria levar os alunos a reflectir acerca da importância dada ao portefólio e à sua influência na disciplina de Língua Portuguesa. Como

Superada a diferenciação da natureza jurídica, o próximo passo será definir o tipo societário que melhor se amoldará à situação da família. 17) não significa dizer