• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.66 número1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.66 número1"

Copied!
6
0
0

Texto

(1)

REVISTA

BRASILEIRA

DE

ANESTESIOLOGIA

OfficialPublicationoftheBrazilianSocietyofAnesthesiology www.sba.com.br

MISCELLANEOUS

Profile

of

drug

administration

errors

in

anesthesia

among

anesthesiologists

from

Santa

Catarina

Thomas

Rolf

Erdmann

,

Jorge

Hamilton

Soares

Garcia,

Marcos

Lázaro

Loureiro,

Marcelo

Petruccelli

Monteiro,

Guilherme

Muriano

Brunharo

HospitalGovernadorCelsoRamos,Florianópolis,SC,Brazil

Received19April2014;accepted26June2014 Availableonline30November2015

KEYWORDS

Medicalerrors; Drugerrors; Anesthesiology; Anesthesia

Abstract

Introduction:Anesthesiologyistheonlymedicalspecialtythatprescribes,dilutes,and admin-istersdrugswithoutconferralbyanotherprofessional.Addingtothehighfrequencyofdrug administration,apropitiousscenariotoerrorsiscreated.

Objective: Accesstheprevalenceofdrugadministrationerrorsduringanesthesiaamong anes-thesiologists from Santa Catarina, the circumstances in which they occurred, and possible associatedfactors.

Materialsandmethods: An electronic questionnaire was sent to all anesthesiologists from SociedadedeAnestesiologiadoEstadodeSantaCatarina,withdirectormultiplechoice ques-tionsonresponderdemographics andanesthesiapracticeprofile;prevalenceoferrors,type andconsequenceoferror;andfactorsthatmayhavecontributedtotheerrors.

Results:Oftherespondents,91.8%reportedtheyhadcommittedadministrationerrors,adding thetotalerrorof274andmeanof4.7(6.9)errorsperrespondent.Themostcommonerrorwas replacement(68.4%),followedbydoseerror(49.1%),andomission(35%).Only7%of respon-dentsreportedneuraxialadministrationerror.Regardingcircumstancesoferrors,theymainly occurredinthemorning(32.7%),inanesthesiamaintenance(49%),with47.8%withoutharmto thepatientand1.75%withthehighestmorbidityandirreversibledamage,and87.3%ofcases with immediateidentification.Asfor possiblecontributingfactors,themostfrequent were distractionandfatigue(64.9%)andmisreadingoflabels,ampoules,orsyringes(54.4%).

Conclusion: Mostrespondentscommittedmore thanoneerrorinanesthesiaadministration, mainlyjustifiedasadistractionorfatigue,andoflowgravity.

© 2014SociedadeBrasileirade Anestesiologia.Publishedby ElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrights reserved.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:thomaserdmann@hotmail.com(T.R.Erdmann). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.06.011

(2)

PALAVRAS-CHAVE

Errosmédicos; Errosdemedicac¸ão; Anestesiologia; Anestesia

Perfildeerrosdeadministrac¸ãodemedicamentosemanestesiaentre

anestesiologistascatarinenses

Resumo

Introduc¸ão:Aanestesiologiaéaúnicaespecialidademédicaqueprescreve,diluieadministraos fármacossemconferênciadeoutroprofissional.Somando-seaaltafrequênciadeadministrac¸ão defármacos,cria-seocenáriopropícioaoserros.

Objetivo:Verificaraprevalênciadoserrosdeadministrac¸ãodemedicamentosdurante aneste-sia,entreanestesiologistascatarinenses,ascircunstânciasemqueocorreramepossíveisfatores associados.

Materiaisemétodos:Umquestionárioeletrônicofoienviado atodososanestesiologistasda SociedadedeAnestesiologiadoEstadodeSantaCatarinacontendorespostasdiretasoude múlti-plaescolhasobredadosdemográficoseperfildapráticaanestésicadoentrevistado;prevalência deerros,tipoeconsequênciadoerro;efatoresquepossivelmentecontribuíramparaoserros.

Resultados: Dosentrevistados,91,8%afirmaramtercometidoerrodeadministrac¸ão,somando total deerros de274 emédia de4,7 (6,9) errospor entrevistado.Oerro maiscomum foi substituic¸ão(68,4%),seguidoporerrodedose(49,1%)eomissão(35%).Apenas7%dos entre-vistadosreferiramerrosdeadministrac¸ãononeuroeixo.Quantoàscircunstânciasdoserros, ocorreramprincipalmente noperíodomatutino(32,7%), namanutenc¸ão daanestesia(49%), com47,8%semdanosaopacientee1,75%commaiormorbidadecomdanoirreversíveleem 87,3%doscasosaidentificac¸ãoimediata.Quantoaospossíveisfatorescontribuintes,osmais frequentesforam:distrac¸ãoefadiga(64,9%)eleituraerradadosrótulosdeampolasouseringas (54,4%).

Conclusão:A maioria dos anestesiologistas entrevistados cometeu mais de um erro de administrac¸ão em anestesia,principalmente justificadocomo distrac¸ãoou fadiga,de baixa gravidade.

©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeAnestesiologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda.Todosos direitosreservados.

Introduction

Drugadministrationerrorsareimportantcausesofmorbidity andmortality,1,2accountingforabout7000deathsperyear

inthe United States,3 resulting indirect health costsand

possiblyavoidablehuman suffering.2 Anesthesiologyisthe

onlymedicalspecialtythatprescribes,dilutes,and adminis-tersdrugswithoutconferralbyanotherprofessional.Adding tothehighfrequencyofdrugadministration,aswellasits potencyandapplicationurgency,itcreatesafavorable set-tingfor errorsandtothedisastrousconsequencesofsuch failure.

Thus,thereareseveralstudiesreportingdrug administra-tionerrorsasanimportantcauseofanestheticmorbidityand mortality.Ina1984study,evaluatinganesthesiaincidents, themostfrequentlyreportedwererespiratorysystem shut-downandneedleExchange.4Inanotherstudyperformedin

Denmarkofdeathsrelatedtoanesthesia,medicationerrors werethesecond leadingcause,secondonlytoairwayand ventilation problems. When associated with deaths from medicationerrorsandinfusionpumpproblems,theybecome thestudyleadingcauseofmortality.5

Overthepast60years,manystudieshaveassessedthe prevalenceofdrugadministrationerrorin anesthesia,but prospectiveworks designedspecifically tostudy the issue aroseonlyinthelastdecade.6---10 Suchworksreported

inci-dencesrangingfromoneerrorforeach133---450anesthesia applications. Considering the higher incidence, it was

estimatedthateachanesthesiologistmakessevenmistakes a year and consequently causes damage in two patients overacareer.2

Thus,togetherwiththegrowing interestinissues con-cerning thepatientsafetyduringanesthesia, itisofgreat valuetoexaminetheprevalenceofmedicationerrorsamong anesthesiologistsinSantaCatarina,aswellasthe verifica-tionofthefactorsthatcontributetotheerror.

Objective

Checkthe prevalenceofdrugadministrationerrorsduring anesthesia among anesthesiologists in Santa Catarina, as wellasthecircumstancesinwhichtheyoccurred,andassess thepossibleassociatedfactors.

Method

(3)

errors,type,detection time,andworst consequence of a committederror.The lastsection investigatedthe factors thatmayhavecontributedtotheerror.

The questionnairewassentby e-mailtwice,with four-week interval, together with an explanatory text on the researchnature,subjectrelevance,andinformedconsent for the use of data to all associated anesthesiologists of the Society of Anesthesiology of the Stateof Santa Cata-rina(SAESC)intheyear2013.Participationinthestudywas voluntaryuponacceptanceofthetermssentviaemail.

Thesoftwareusedforsendingthequestionnaireand stor-ageofresponseswastheSurveyMonkeyandforstatistical analysisandchartpreparation,MicrosoftExcelwasused.

Results

The questionnaire wassentto membersof the Anesthesi-ology Society of the State of Santa Catarina in July and August2013,30daysapart.Ofthe376membersofSAESC, 61answeredthequestionnaire,andtheresponseratewas 16.2%.

Regarding demographic data,the mean age of respon-dents was39 (standard deviation, 10.8) years, and80.3% were male. The mean working time with anesthesiology including residency training was 13 (10.6) years, and the meanweeklyworkinghourswas59(20.1)hours.Asfor spe-cialization,only16.4%werestillattendingresidency,45.9% hadanaesthesiologyexperttitle,and37.7%hadasuperior titleinanesthesiology.

AsshowninFig.1,91.8%ofrespondentssaidtheyhave committedadrugadministrationerror,withatotalnumber of 274 errors and a mean error of 4.7 (6.9) per intervie-wee. The most common type of error was replacement, committedby68.4%ofrespondents,followedbydoseerror (49.1%)andomission(35%).Withregard toneuraxialdrug administration error, only 7% of respondents reported its occurrence.Fig.2showserrortypesandpercentages.

Asforthecircumstancesinwhichtheerrorsoccurred,the majorityreportedtohaveoccurredinthemorning(32.7%), followed by the afternoon (21.8%) and evening (16.3%) periods.However,29%ofrespondentsdidnotrememberthe timetheerroroccurred.Mostoftheerrorsoccurredduring

8%

92%

Yes No

Figure 1 Prevalence of drug administration error among SantaCatarinaanesthesiologists.

0% 10%20%30%40%50%60%70% 80%

Incorrect route (administration of a drug by another route)

Incorrect dose (unwanted concentration, amount or infusion rate) Insertion (drug administered in unwanted

time)

Replacement (administration of a drug different from the intended one) Repetition (readministration of a drug due

to prior administration uncertainty)

Omission (a forgotten/non-administered drug or…)

Figure2 Typesoferrorsandprevalence.

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Other

Inadequated communication among anesthesiologists

Programming or malfunction of pumps Improper storage

Lack of knowledge or experience with the drug

Misreading of label/vial

Pressure to perform the procedure

Distraction/fatigue

Figure3 Factorsthatrespondentsbelievedhadcontributed totheerrors.

maintenance of anesthesia (49%), followed by the induc-tionofanesthesia(30.9%)andextubation(12.7%)periods.A minorityofrespondentsreportedhavingcommittederrors inthepreanesthetic(5.5%)orpostanesthetic(1.8%)periods. Regardingthe worst consequence of anerror, 47.8% of thosewhomademistakes reportedthattheerrorsdidnot bringharm to the patient, 43.9% reported less morbidity withreversibledamage,withincreasedtimetoextubation orpostanestheticrecovery.Highermorbiditywithreversible damagerequiringinvasivemonitoringwasreportedby7%of respondents,andhighermorbiditywithirreversibledamage wasreported by only one respondent (1.75%). No deaths were reported. For 87.3% of respondents who had made mistakes,theerroridentificationwasimmediate.

Regardingthepossiblefactorsthatrespondentsbelieved hadcontributedtotheerrors,themostcommonwere: dis-tractionandfatigue(64.9%),misreadingthelabelsofvialsor syringes(54.4%),pressuretoperformtheprocedure(21%), andimproperstorage(19%),asshowninFig.3.

Discussion

Thisstudyshowedthattheabsolutemajorityof anesthesiol-ogistshavecommittedadrugadministrationerror,andsome ofthemalreadycommittedmorethan oneerror. Notably, mostoftheseerrorsbroughtlittleconsequenceandlow mor-bidity,withnoreportofdeath.Thisresultisinagreement withtheliteratureonthesubject. Thisisacomplexissue and,assuch,difficulttostudy,withagreatvarietyoftypes ofstudiesonthesubjectandfewprospectivestudies.

ACanadianstudy,withadesignsimilartothis,reported that 85% of that country anesthesiologists have commit-ted an error or ‘‘quasi error’’, with four cases of death reported as a direct consequence of drug administration error,althoughmostofthemdidnotresultinmorbidity.11

(4)

formonitoringincidents,reportingthat itwas7%and10% ofallincidentsreported.12,13Inanotherstudywithsimilar

method,thisincidencewas21%of reportedincidentsand 0.36%regardingthenumberofanesthesiaintheperiod,but thestudyalsoincludedsideeffectsanddrugreactions.7

Inprospectivestudies,the commonlyusedmethodisa prospectivemonitoringofincidentsinwhich,forany anes-thesiaperformed,thereisaformthatmustbefilled(even negatively) and handed at the end of surgery. In these studiesthereis reallyadenominatorandtheincidenceof errorsmaybemoreaccuratelydetermined.Thehighest inci-dencereportedinaNewZealandstudy6was0.75%,orone

errorfor every133anesthesiaapplications,muchlikethe resultsofarecentChineseprospectivestudy9reportingan

incidenceof 0.73%, or one error for each 136 anesthesia applications.

In ourstudy,the mostcommon typeof errorwasdrug replacement, followed by incorrect dose and omission. Olderstudiesassumethatanerroroccurswhenthewrong drugordoseisgiven,11,12,14andothertypesoferror,suchas

omissionand incorrectroute ofadministration, were con-sideredonlyinmorerecentstudies.Thereisnodoubtthat these three types of error are the most common, how-ever,itsincidencevarieswiththestudies.Inmoststudies, replacement errors are the most frequent.6,8 In a

multi-centerstudy byLlewellyn etal.,it isinteresting thatthe replacementerrorswere morecommon whenaggregating the data for the three participating hospitals; however, whendata fromthe pediatrichospital areevaluated sep-arately,doseerrorsareasfrequentasreplacement.8 This

finding probably reflects the wide variations in weight amongpediatric patients, requiring frequent and unusual dilutions.

Incontrasttootherprospectivestudies,themost com-monerrorreportedbyZhangetal.9wasomission.Thisresult

is perhaps what most reflects the reality, given the high possibilityof memorybiasinvolving omissions:ifthedrug dose hasbeen forgotten, itis unlikely that theindividual remembertoreportit.

Inaccordancewithmostprospectivestudies,8,9ourstudy

showedthatmostoftheerrorsoccurduringmaintenanceof anesthesiabecausethisisthelongestperiodofanesthesia, inwhichmostofthedrugisadministeredorsimplybecause thisisatimewhenmonitoringisdecreased.9Thedayperiod

mostcommonlyreportedfortheoccurrenceoferrorswere matutinalandvespertine.Only16%oftheerrorsoccurredat night,thoughpossiblyanevensmallerfractionofsurgeries occurredinthisperiod.

Fatigue,hastiness,andinattentionundermine the abil-ityofanesthesiologiststomonitoractionsinwhichtheyare extremelyskilledandusuallypaynoattention.Thus, simi-larvialsor syringesareinterpretedascorrectandapplied wrongly, a well-known failure of the cognitive process.12

Fatigueanddistractionwerethecontributingfactorsmost frequentlycitedbyrespondents.Inaninitialassessment,in additiontothehigh workloads citedby respondents,it is easytoconcludethattheresultingfatiguefromoverwork makesthegapsincognitiveprocessmorelikely,leadingto theerrorand,consequently,toatendencyofanindividual errorapproach.

However, on further analysis, based on a work by Reason15andreviewbyWheeleretal.,16wenotethatthere

are organizational and administrative latent conditions that contribute to the error. Factors such as the lack of standardization of ampoules, labels, pharmacological presentation, andinfusionpump softwares,aswellasthe division of work that allows endless working hours and pressuretoproduce.15,16

Withthisinmind,itisworthnotingthatinourworkthe other contributingfactorscitedby respondentswere mis-readingthelabelsofvialsorsyringes,pressuretoperform theprocedure,andimproperstorage,allofwhichare associ-atedwithlatentconditionsandnotonlywiththeindividual. Thus,theerrorapproachmustalsoincludethesystem, tak-ingintoaccountthatphysicians areattheend ofa chain andonlypartofasystematicfailure.15,16

Althoughnotevaluatedinthisstudy,thepharmacological class generally more involved in the errors are the neu-romuscular blockers.7,14 This is a worrying fact given the

devastatingconsequences ofits unwantedadministration, especiallyinawakepatients.ANorwegianstudyestimated thatapatientreceivesneuromuscularblockerseverythree monthswhileawake.14Thepossibleexplanationisdrugthe

storagein5mLsyringes,asmostopioids,7aswellasitsuse

throughoutanesthesia.

Timely,itisworthnotingthatthehighincidenceoferrors inanesthesiologycontrastswiththelowincidenceof mor-tality and irreversible morbidity.14 In our study,only one

anesthesiologistreportedirreversibledamageandtherewas no report of death. Still, most anesthesiologists reported thattheerrordetectionwasimmediate.Thefactthatthe drugs used in anesthesia cause significant and immediate physiologicalchanges,combinedwiththespecialty charac-teristicmonitoringandconstanttrainingincriticalevents, mightexplainthisfinding.

Asthisisaproblemwithrareunfavorableoutcome,but potentially catastrophic,itmaybedifficulttostatistically provetheeffectivenessofeachsafetymeasure.Itisworth mentioning a study that reported a tendency to overall reductionoferrorswiththeuseofcoloredlabels,althoughit hasnotreachedstatisticalsignificance.Asignificant reduc-tion of errors involving only an exchange of ampolas was observed.14 Wemust remember thattheaviation industry

isaglobal securitymodel,andthatthepracticesadopted toreduce morbidityandmortalitywerenotbasedon evi-dence.Logicalandpracticalmeasureswereestablishedand asafetyculturewascreated.13,17

This study has some limitations. First, this is a cross-sectional study and it is only possible to calculate the prevalenceoferrorswithlowlevelofevidence.Moreover, theresponseratewaslowevenwhencomparedtosimilarly designedstudies,11probablyduetotheuseoftheinternet

tosendthequestionnaire,assuchcommunication vehicle probablyinspireslesscommitmenttotheresearch.

(5)

habits such as proper labeling and conference, such as institutional, with standardization of ampoules, syringes andlabels,useofbarcodeandcolors,evenifnotbasedon evidence, inorder toreduce to aminimum the potential forerrorandcreateasafetycultureinanesthesiology.

Conclusion

Mostrespondents made morethan one anesthesia admin-istrationerror,mainlyjustifiedasa distractionor fatigue, withlowincidenceofmajorconsequences.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

Appendix

1.

Questionnaire

1. Whatisyourage?(years) 2. Whatisyoursex?(M/F)

3. Howlongdoyou workwithanesthesia(including resi-dency)?(years)

4. Howmanyhoursdoyouworkaweek? 5. Whatisyourlevelofexpertise?

Residencyinprogress

Anesthesiologist(specialisttitle) SuperiortitleinAnesthesiology

6. Haveyouevercommittedamedicationerror?(yes/no) 7. Howmanytimeshaveitoccurred?

8. Whatkindofmistakeshaveyoucommitted? Omission(aforgotten/non-administereddrug) Repetition(re-administrationofadrug)

Replacement (administration of a drug different fromtheintendedone)

Insertion(drugadministeredinunwantedtime) Incorrectdose (unwanted concentration, amount orinfusionrate)

Incorrectroute

9. Didsomefactorbelowcontributedtotheerror? Distractionorfatigue

Pressuretoperformtheprocedure

Misreadingoflabel/vialorsimilarcontainer Lackofknowledgeorexperiencewiththedrug Improperstorage

Incorrectprogrammingor malfunction ofinfusion pump

Inadequate communication among anesthesiolo-gists

Otherorunspecified

10. Someofyourmistakesoccurredbyincorrectneuraxial drugadministration?(yes/no)

11. Whatwastheworstconsequenceofanadministration errorofyours?

Nodamage(errorresultedinnochangeinthe anes-thesiaplanorincreasedrecoverytime)

Minormorbiditywithreversibledamage(increased timetoextubationorpost-anesthesiarecovery) Majormorbiditywithreversibledamage (invasive monitoringrequiredforerrorcorrection)

Majormorbiditywithirreversibledamage (myocar-dial infarction, heart failure, or permanent neurologicalsequelae)

Death

12. Inwhatshiftofthedaythemostseriouserroroccurred? Matutinal

Vespertine Nightly

Idonotremember

13. Whenintheperioperativeperioddidyourmostserious mistakeoccurred?

Preanesthetic

Inductionofanesthesia(orearlyintraoperative) Maintenanceofanesthesia

Extubation(ormomentsbeforeextubation) Postoperative

14. Howlongdidittakeyoutoidentifyyourmostserious mistake?

Immediateidentification Lateidentification

Suspectederror,unconfirmed

References

1.LeapeLL, BrennanTA,LairdN,etal. Thenatureofadverse eventsinhospitalizedpatients.ResultsoftheHarvardMedical PracticeStudyII.NEnglJMed.1991;324:377---84.

2.GlavinRJ.Drugerrors:consequences,mechanisms,and avoid-ance.BrJAnaesth.2010;105:76---82.

3.PhillipsDP,Christenfeld N,GlynnLM.IncreaseinUS medica-tionerrordeathsbetween1983and 1993.Lancet. 1998;351: 643---4.

4.Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Kitz RJ. An analysis of major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia management: considerations for prevention and detection. Anesthesiology. 1984;60:34---42.

5.Hove LD, Steinmetz J, Christoffersen JK, et al. Analysis of deaths related to anesthesia in the period 1996---2004 from closedclaimsregisteredbytheDanishPatientInsurance Asso-ciation.Anesthesiology.2007;106:675---80.

6.WebsterCS,MerryAF,LarssonL,etal.Thefrequencyandnature ofdrugadministrationerrorduringanaesthesia.Anaesth Inten-siveCare.2001;29:494---500.

7.KhanFA,HodaMQ.Drugrelatedcriticalincidents.Anaesthesia. 2005;60:48---52.

8.Llewellyn RL, Gordon PC, Wheatcroft D, et al. Drug admin-istrationerrors:a prospectivestudysurvey fromthreeSouth African teaching hospitals.Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37: 93---8.

9.ZhangY,DongYJ,WebsterCS,etal.Thefrequencyandnature ofdrug administrationerrorduringanaesthesia ina Chinese hospital.ActaAnaesthesiolScand.2013;57:158---64.

10.Cooper L, Nossaman B. Medication errors in anesthesia: a review.IntAnesthesiolClin.2013;51:1---12.

11.Orser BA, Chen RJ, Yee DA. Medication errors in anes-theticpractice:asurveyof687practitioners.CanJAnaesth. 2001;48:139---46.

12.CurrieM,MackayP,MorganC,etal. TheAustralianIncident MonitoringStudy. The «wrongdrug» problem inanaesthesia: ananalysisof2000incidentreports.Anaesth IntensiveCare. 1993;21:596---601.

(6)

14.Fasting S, Gisvold SE. Adverse drug errors in anesthesia, and the impact of coloured syringe labels. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47:1060---7.

15.ReasonJT.Humanerror:modelsandmanagement.BrMedJ. 2000;320:768---70.

16.WheelerSJ,WheelerDW.Medicationerrorsinanaesthesiaand criticalcare.Anaesthesia.2005;60:257---73.

Imagem

Figure 3 Factors that respondents believed had contributed to the errors.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

A perigosidade do objecto, que incita movimentos mais próximos da lógica do luto mas sem essas suas capacidades organizadoras, é responsável pelas clivagens objectais, obser- vadas

De forma mais branda, Prince e Beaver, (2001) e Tarapanoff (2004), concordam que o termo UC tem um valor simbólico e até mesmo um apelo de marketing que objetiva melhorar

According to Kvale (1995), credibility in qualitative research becomes evident whenever the researcher develops works that can be: (i) in the pro- cess of problematizing of the

Given the high prevalence of HBV markers in the different regions of the state of Santa Catarina, the high risk of transmission of HBV infection through transfusions and the high

Analisando agora a figura 89, onde se encontra representada a evolução da performance com a variação do número de neurónios na primeira camada interna, é possível

Ao Dr Oliver Duenisch pelos contatos feitos e orientação de língua estrangeira Ao Dr Agenor Maccari pela ajuda na viabilização da área do experimento de campo Ao Dr Rudi Arno

Neste trabalho o objetivo central foi a ampliação e adequação do procedimento e programa computacional baseado no programa comercial MSC.PATRAN, para a geração automática de modelos

The results obtained indicate that the nutritional status of adolescent students in Brazil is characterized by: low prevalence of underweight; high prevalence of over- weight; as