Short-lived pollutants in the Arctic: their climate impact and possible mitigation strategies

In contrast, there are differences between models in their response to removing anthropogenic BC emissions: NorESM shows a clear cooling, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere;

In Zimbabwe research and literature on the impact of climate variability on agricultural productivity as well as the adaptation strategies devised by the rural poor

During the period of scientific campaign “Arctic Study of Tropospheric Aerosols, Clouds and Radiation 2004” (ASTAR2004), precipitation samples were collected in late spring

The model has been used to study the impact of aerosol direct radiative e ff ect on East Asian climate (Zhang et al., 2012a), direct radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols (Bond

Sen’s slope with the Mann–Kendall test (denoted by a *) for the Arctic regions of the Arctic Ocean (AO), Nordic Greenland Sea (NGS), Barents Sea (BS), Kara Sea (KS), Laptev Sea

We then summarize airborne measurements, made in the troposphere of the Alaskan Arctic, of aerosol particle size distributions, composition, and optical proper- ties and discuss

Tropospheric ozone changes, radiative forcing and attribution to emissions in the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP)..

Here we assess the aerosol optical depth ( τ ), direct radiative effect (DRE) by natural and anthropogenic aerosols, and direct climate forcing (DCF) by anthropogenic aerosols,