• Nenhum resultado encontrado

2º Painel - Produção e disseminação de pesquisa aplicada

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "2º Painel - Produção e disseminação de pesquisa aplicada"

Copied!
18
0
0

Texto

(1)

Measuring Research Impact

Vladimir Ponczek1 Cristine Pinto1

1S ˜ao Paulo School of Economics, FGV

(2)

Introduction

Main Ideas:

Dimensions

Measures

Aggregations

(3)

Dimensions

Impact to academia

Impact to policy-making

Public dissemination

(4)

Dimensions

Impact to Academia

Peer-reviewed publications.

Thesis and dissertations (students participation).

(5)

Dimensions

Impact to Policy-Making

Policy papers.

Participation in policy-making workshops and congresses.

Courses and training targeting policy-makers.

(6)

Dimensions

Public Dissemination

Events (seminars, workshops, lectures) open to general public.

Courses open to general public.

Media Coverage.

(7)

Dimensions

Financial Funding

Funding from research agencies.

Funding from private sector.

(8)

Measures

Impact to Academia

Peer-reviewed publications.

Journal ranking (ranking CL - Based onInferring Missing Citations: A Quantitative Multi-Criteria Ranking of all Journal in Economics by Combes and Linnemer):

Focuses on Economics (EconLit), but considers other fields (multidisciplinary).

Impact factors based on JCR (Thomson-Reuters) and Google H-Index.

Takes into consideration self-citation, page numbers and number of co-authors.

(9)

Measures

Impact to Academia

Table :CL-Ranking

Journal CLm Final Ranking Quarterly Journal of Economics 100.00 1

Econometrica 98.42 2

American Economic Review 96.14 3

Journal of Finance 94.21 4

Review of Economic Studies 86.37 5 Journal of Political Economy 82.93 6 Journal of Financial Economics 82.56 7 Review of Financial Studies 78.41 8 Review of Economics and Statistics 68.50 9 Journal of Econometrics 66.55 10 Journal of Economic Theory 65.27 11

Economic Journal 59.94 12

(10)

Measures

Impact to Academia

Thesis and Dissertations

Number of thesis and dissertation defenses.

Number of thesis and dissertation published in peer-reviewed journals.

Academic Seminar, Congresses and Workshops.

Number of papers of students or/and professors accepted in congresses and workshops.

Number of academic seminars presented in other institutions by students or professors.

(11)

Measures

Impact to Policy-making

Policy papers

Number of working papers or papers produced by professors and students published in thinks-tanks, government journals,

working-paper series, etc.

Participation in policy-making workshops and congresses.

Number of attendances in workshops and debates with policy-makers.

Number of workshops and seminars promoted by the Centers with policy-makers.

Courses and training targeting policy-makers

Number of lectures in courses targeting policy-makers. Number of courses promoted by the Centers targeting policy-makers.

Number of courses’ participants.

Project development to the public sector

(12)

Measures

Public Dissemination

Events open to general public

Number of attendances in workshops and debates with the general public.

Number of events promoted by the Centers open to the general public.

Number of events’ participants.

Media coverage

Media Metrics

Online dissemination

Number of website accesses Social media metrics

Courses and training targeting general public

(13)

Measures

Financial Funding

Funding from research agencies

Research Grants (in R$). Student scholarships.

Professor and student fellowships.

Funding from private sector

Research Grants (in R$).

(14)

Aggregation

One size does not fit all!

Centers may have different objectives and aggregation must reflect them!

(15)

Aggregation

Aggregation

Centers are ranked in each sub-dimension.

Aggregate each dimension using different weights based on Center type.

(16)

Aggregation

Table :Suggestions of Weights

Center focus Academia Policy-making

Academia 60% 15%

Peer reviewed Publication 70% 60% Thesis and dissertations 20% 20% Congress and workshops 10% 20%

Policy-making 15% 60%

Policy papers 25% 30%

Congress and workshops 25% 15%

Courses 25% 15%

Project Development 25% 40%

Public Dissemination 10% 10%

Congress and workshops 25% 15%

Courses 25% 15%

Media Coverage 30% 50%

Online dissemination 20% 20%

Financial funding 15% 15%

Research Agencies 60% 50%

(17)

Aggregation

Table :Example for policy-making Centers

Center A Center B Center C

Academia 15% 2 1.4 2.6

Peer reviewed Publication 60% 2 1 3 Thesis and dissertations 20% 1 2 3 Congress and workshops 20% 3 2 1

Policy-making 60% 2.1 2 1.9

Policy papers 30% 1 2 3

Congress and workshops 15% 2 1 3

Courses 15% 2 3 1

Project Development 40% 3 2 1

Public Dissemination 10% 2.2 2.3 1.5

Congress and workshops 15% 3 2 1

Courses 15% 1 2 3

Online dissemination 20% 3 1 2

Media Coverage 50% 2 3 1

Financial funding 15% 2 2 2

Research Agencies 50% 2 3 1

Private sector 50% 2 1 3

Final Index 2.08 1.94 1.98

(18)

Next Steps

Internal discussion with faculty members.

New specialized staff:

Data collection and measuring of impact.

Imagem

Table : CL-Ranking
Table : Suggestions of Weights Center focus Academia Policy-making
Table : Example for policy-making Centers

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Assim, a dignidade humana deve ser especialmente utilizada na defesa de direitos das pessoas inseridas em setores sociais mais vulneráveis, a exemplo dos transexuais, ou da- queles

Ainda assim, e mesmo na dimensão disciplinar da História, haverá sempre um “nível micro”, no qual comentários específicos – autorais ou anônimos - altamente

Responsabilidade Social Empresarial: oportunidades perdidas para trabalhadores e empregadores Criar mecanismos de recompensa para os funcionários  que  contribuam  na 

oligolepis is also present to the south of the Alcoa River, in the small inde- pendent coastal drainages of Real and Alcabrichel Rivers (Diogo, 1999).. Chondrostoma arcasii is

Essa ideia é reforçada por Al- Hawamdeh (2002) que dá ênfase as pessoas que possuem conhecimento e cuja transmissão é favorecida pela comunicação e sobretudo

A partir de então perduraram quase 50 anos de pouco, quiçá nenhum, interesse na relação entre a doença bucal e as doenças sistêmicas, até que a partir do anos de

E por falar em dedicação, a de Gerson Mascarenhas, como dirigente, era não só para as grandes lutas, mas também para as mais localizadas, onde ele dava sempre o melhor de si..

A análise estatística realizou-se através da criação de tabelas de contingência e teste de Fisher e Qui-quadrado, de forma a interpretar a associação de alguns