• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Correction: Efficacy and Safety Assessment of the Addition of Bevacizumab to Adjuvant Therapy Agents in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Correction: Efficacy and Safety Assessment of the Addition of Bevacizumab to Adjuvant Therapy Agents in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials."

Copied!
1
0
0

Texto

(1)

CORRECTION

Correction: Efficacy and Safety Assessment

of the Addition of Bevacizumab to Adjuvant

Therapy Agents in Cancer Patients: A

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of

Randomized Controlled Trials

Fariba Ahmadizar, N. Charlotte Onland-Moret, Anthonius de Boer, Geoffrey Liu, Anke

H. Maitland-van der Zee

The phrases

log hazard ratio

and

log HR

appear incorrectly throughout the article and

Sup-porting Information files, with the exception of the

Data analysis

subsection, Fig 5, and Fig 6.

The correct terminology in all other cases should be

hazard ratio

and

HR.

Reference

1. Ahmadizar F, Onland-Moret NC, de Boer A, Liu G, Maitland-van der Zee AH (2015) Efficacy and Safety Assessment of the Addition of Bevacizumab to Adjuvant Therapy Agents in Cancer Patients: A System-atic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0136324. doi:10. 1371/journal.pone.0136324PMID:26331473

PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0141704 October 22, 2015 1 / 1

OPEN ACCESS

Citation:Ahmadizar F, Onland-Moret NC, de Boer A, Liu G, Maitland-van der Zee AH (2015) Correction: Efficacy and Safety Assessment of the Addition of Bevacizumab to Adjuvant Therapy Agents in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS ONE 10(10): e0141704. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141704

Published:October 22, 2015

Copyright:© 2015 Ahmadizar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Antes de iniciar a referida discussão, cabe ressalvar que a finalidade desta seção não é realizar a comparação entre as situações propostas pela professora e a

perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of all randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of all avail- able endoscopic treatments when compared to

Phase II randomized trial comparing sequential first-line everolimus and second-line sunitinib versus first-line sunitinib and second-line everolimus in patients with metastatic

Desde uma perspectiva global, tendo em vista a fraqueza e a crise de sentido das narrativas racionais das instituições sociais na modernidade tardia, apresentamos neste trabalho

No Brasil também temos críticos às propostas do MMM, como Ávila, que afirma que o ensino da Matemática vive uma crise que se estende há muitos anos, mais precisamente desde o

We aimed to show the long term efficacy and safety of the use of anticholinergic agents in patients with LUTS and DO (proven by urodyna- mic studies) by a placebo controlled

[r]

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of chemo- therapy and support treatment in patients with advanced non-resect- able gastric cancer in a systematic review