w w w . r b o . o r g . b r
Original
article
Long-term
functional
evaluation
of
videoarthroscopic
treatment
of
partial
injuries
of
the
rotator
cuff
夽
Glaydson
Gomes
Godinho
a,b,∗,
Flávio
de
Oliveira
Franc¸a
a,c,
José
Márcio
Alves
Freitas
a,b,
Flávio
Márcio
Lago
e
Santos
a,c,
Danilo
Santos
Resende
a,b,
João
Pedro
Zambrano
Wageck
a,b,
Sara
Fortes
Barbosa
Portela
a,baHospitalOrtopédico,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil
bHospitalBeloHorizonte,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil
cHospitalLifecenter,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received12July2013 Accepted7March2014 Availableonline11March2015
Keywords:
Shoulder Arthroscopy Rotatorcuff
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Objective:Tocomparethefunctionalresultsfromhighandlow-gradeisolatedpartiallesions
ofthesupraspinatustendonofbursalandarticulartypes,afterarthroscopictreatment.
Methods:Sixty-fourpatientswithisolatedpartiallesionsofthesupraspinatustendonwere
evaluated.Themeanlengthoffollow-upwas76months(range:29–193).Themeanagewas 59years(range:36–82).Thedominantsidewasaffectedin44patients(68.8%).Therewere35 bursallesions(54.7%)and29articularlesions(45.3%).WeusedtheEllmanclassificationand characterizedthelesionsasloworhigh-gradeaccordingtowhethertheyaffectedlessthan ormorethan50%ofthetendonthickness,respectively.Debridementwasperformedin15 patients(23.5%),repairwithoutcompletingthelesionin11(17%)andrepairaftercompleting thelesionin38(59.5%).Thefunctionalassessmentsonthepatientsweredoneusingthe Constant&MurleyandUCLAscores.
Results:ThemeanConstant&Murleyscoreamongthepatientswithbursallesionswas
82.64±6.98(range:59.3–99)andamongthose witharticularlesions,83.57±7.58(range: 66–95),whilethemeanUCLAscoreinthebursallesionswas33.37±2.85(range:21–35) andinthearticularlesions,32.83±2.95(range:22–35).
Conclusion:Videoarthroscopictreatmentofpartiallesionsoftherotatorcuffpresentsgood
orexcellentresultswhenthelow-gradelesionsaredebridedandthehigh-gradelesions arecompletedandrepaired.Theseresultsaremaintainedoverthelongterm,withahigh satisfactionrateandfewcomplications.
©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora Ltda.Allrightsreserved.
夽
WorkdevelopedattheShoulderSurgeryServicesoftheHospitalOrtopédicoandHospitalBeloHorizonte,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil.
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:[email protected](G.G.Godinho). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2015.02.015
Avaliac¸ão
funcional
em
longo
prazo
do
tratamento
videoartroscópico
das
lesões
parciais
do
manguito
rotador
Palavras-chave:
Ombro Artroscopia Manguitorotador
r
e
s
u
m
o
Objetivo: Compararosresultadosfuncionais,apósotratamentoartroscópico,daslesões
parciaisisoladasdotendãosupra-espinaldostiposbursalearticularnosgrausaltoebaixo.
Métodos:Foramavaliados64pacientescomlesõesparciaisisoladasdotendãosupra-espinal.
Seguimentomédiode76meses(29a193).Amédiadeidadefoide59anos(36a82).Olado dominantefoiacometidoem44pacientes(68,8%).Observadas35lesõesbursais(54,7%)e29 articulares(45,3%).Usamosaclassificac¸ãodeEllmanecaracterizamosaslesõescomobaixo ealtograuquandoacometiammenosoumaisde50%desuaespessura,respectivamente. Foifeitodesbridamentoem15pacientes(23,5%),reparosemcompletaralesãoem11(17%) ereparoapóscompletaralesãoem38(59,5%).Aavaliac¸ãoclínicafuncionaldospacientes foifeitacomousodosescoresdeConstant&MurleyeUCLA.
Resultados: A média dos escores de Constant dos pacientes com lesão bursal foi de
82,64±6,98(59,3a99)ecomlesãoarticularfoide83,57±7,58(66a95),enquantoquea médiadoUCLAnaslesõesbursaisfoide33,37±2,85(21a35)enaslesõesarticularesfoide 32,83±2,95(22a35).
Conclusão: Otratamentovideoartroscópicodaslesõesparciaisdomanguitorotador
apre-sentaresultadosbons/excelentesquandoaslesõesdebaixograusãodesbridadaseaslesões dealtograusãocompletadasereparadas.Essesresultadossemantêmemlongoprazo,com altoíndicedesatisfac¸ãoepoucascomplicac¸ões.
©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevier EditoraLtda.Todososdireitosreservados.
Introduction
Partial lesions of the rotator cuff are a frequent cause of
pain and functional limitation of the shoulder. They can
occur oneither thearticular or thebursalside, or may be intrasubstantial.1 Theincidenceofarticularlesionsisthree timesthatofbursallesions.2 Ithasbeenobservedthatthe footprintofthesupraspinatustendonhasameanthicknessof 12mm.3Interfingeringofthefibersoftherotatorcufftendons occursatthislocation,suchthatthedeepestfiberspresent obliqueorientation,whilethesuperficialfibersareparallelto theaxisofthemuscle.4
Ellman1describedaclassificationsystemforpartiallesions
based on their locations and depths, as measured during
arthroscopy. In this system, articular lesions (A) or bursal lesions(B)aredescribedasgradeIiftheirdepthislessthan 3mm,gradeIIifitisbetween3and6mmandgradeIIIifit ismorethan6mm.GradeIandIIlesionscompromiseupto 50%ofthetendonsurface(lowgrade),whilegradeIIIlesions
compromise morethan 50% ofthe thickness (high grade).
Intrasubstantiallesionsaredescribedas(C).
Some partial lesions of the rotator cuff do not heal,
despiteconservativetreatmentwithphysiotherapyanduseof anti-inflammatorydrugs,andrequiresurgicaltreatment.5–11 Severalmethodsofsurgicaltreatmenthavebeendescribed, includingacromioplastyalone,12,13debridementofthelesion withorwithoutacromioplasty,7,14,15transtendonrepair,16–21 conversiontoacompletelesionfollowedbyrepair11,22,23and transosseousrepair.24Thereisstillnoconsensusregardingthe besttreatmentforeachtypeoflesion,butithasbeenshown intheliteraturethatdebridement,withorwithoutassociated
acromioplasty,providessatisfactoryresultsincasesof
low-grade lesions, while high-grade lesions respond better to
repair.25
Themainobjectivesofourstudyweretoevaluatethe func-tionalresultsfollowingvideoarthroscopictreatmentofpartial lesionsoftherotatorcuffandcomparethetypesandgrades
of lesions. We believed that when low-grade lesions were
debrided and high-gradelesions were repaired, the results wouldremainsatisfactoryoverthelongterm,withlowfailure andcomplicationrates.
Materials
and
methods
This wasa retrospective study withfunctional evaluations
onpatientswho underwentvideoarthroscopictreatmentof
partiallesionsoftherotatorcuff.BetweenJanuary1995and December2010,704patientswithpartiallesionsofthe rota-torcuffwereoperatedbymeansofvideoarthroscopyatthe Orthopedic,BeloHorizonte andLifecenterhospitals,bythe BHOrthopedicSurgeryGroup.
Thelesionswerediagnosedbymeansofmagnetic
reso-nanceimaging(MRI)orarthro-MRIand thediagnoseswere
confirmed through arthroscopy.The patientsincluded
pre-sented partial lesions (articular or bursal) solely of the
supraspinatus tendon,withaminimumof2yearsof
post-operative follow-up. The patients had failed to respondto
conservative treatment over a periodof atleast 4months
beforeundergoingsurgery.Theexclusioncriteriacomprised previous surgery on the shoulder; sequelaeof fractures in
the region of the shoulder or the scapular belt; presence
Table1–Topographyofthelesions.
N %
Supraspinatus,bursal 35 54.7
Supraspinatus,articular 29 45.3
rheumatoidarthritis; involvementinemploymentlawsuits;
andfailuretolocatethepatientorinsufficientdocumentation. Thefunctionalevaluationwasmadebymeansofthescores ofConstant and Murley26 and the University of California atLosAngeles(UCLA).27 ThevalidationofBoehm28 forthe Constantscorewasused.Inthis,thequantitativevaluesare expressedqualitatively, asfollows:excellent (91–100), good (81–90),satisfactory(71–80),fair(61–70)orpoor(<60).Usingthe UCLAscore,theresultscouldbeassessedasexcellent(34–35), good(28–33),fair(21–27)orpoor(0–20).
Limbdominance,anyassociationwithprofessionaland/or leisureactivitiesandthe typeand gradeofthelesionwere noted.Thesurgicalparameterstakenintoconsiderationwere: (1)techniqueapplied(debridement,debridement in associ-ation with repairor repair aftercompletion ofthe lesion); (2)presenceofassociatedpathologicalalterationsandtheir
concomitanttreatment;and (3)whetheracromioplastywas
performed.
Sixty-fourpatientswereincluded(64shoulders):31males (48.4%)and33 females(51.6%).Themeanfollow-upwas76
months (range: 29–193). The mean age at the time of the
surgerywas53years(range:26–76)anditwas59yearsatthe timeoftheassessment(range:36–82).Thedominantsidewas affectedin44patients(68.8%)andthe non-dominantin20 (31.2%).
Partialbursallesionswerepresentedby35patients(54.7%) andpartialarticularlesionsby29(45.3%)(Table1).In19cases (29.7%),associatedlesionswerepresent.
The surgical procedures performed were as follows:
debridement in15patients(23.5%); repairwithout comple-tionofthelesionin11(17%);andrepairaftercompletionof thelesionin38(59.5%).Theassociatedprocedureswere as follows:acromioplastyin61cases(95%);totalMunfordinone case(1.5%);partialMunfordintwocases(3%);repairofSLAP lesioninsixcases(9.3%);andrepairofBankartlesioninone case(1.5%)(Table2).
Thedifferencesintheclinicalcharacteristics(profession andsportsactivity)andthefunctionalresults(Constantand UCLA)betweenthegroupsofpatients,accordingtothetype
and grade of the lesion, were analyzed either using the
Mann–Whitneytest orusing the chi-squaretest (according
towhetherthevariablewasquantitativeorqualitative).The
nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Pearson testswere also
used.Theresearchdatawereprocessedthroughthe Statisti-calPackagefortheSocialSciences(SPSS),version17.0.Forall
Table2–Associatedprocedures.
Acromioplasty 61(95%)
TotalMunford(resectionofthedistalclavicle) 1(1.5%)
PartialMunford 2(3%)
RepairofSLAPlesion 6(9.3%)
Bankartsurgery 1(1.5%)
thestatisticalmeasurementsmade,thestatisticalsignificance levelwassetat5%.
Surgicaltechnique
Allthepatientswereoperatedbyfoursurgeons(GGG,FOF,JMF andFMLS)belongingtotheShoulderGroupoftheBH Lifecen-terOrthopedicHospital.Thepatientwaspositionedinlateral decubitusafteradministrationofgeneralanesthesiain asso-ciationwithbrachialplexusblock.Arthroscopicviewingwas obtainedthroughastandardposteriorportaland,iftherewas aneedtorepairanyintra-articularlesion,thiswasaddressed withtheaidofananteriorportallocatedintherotatorcuff interval.Thelesionwasdebridedandthedepthwas evalu-atedusingthetipoftheshaver(4.5mmindiameter).When thisbecamefullyimmersedinthelesion,thelesionwas con-sideredtobeofhighgrade.Thearticularlesionsweremarked
usingamonofilamentthreadthatwasinsertedinaneedle
andpassedpercutaneouslythroughthelesion.
Low-grade partial lesions were treated by means of
debridement,whilehigh-gradelesionswere completedand
then repairedusinganchors.Acromioplastywasperformed
whentherewereintraoperativesignssuggestiveof subacro-mialimpact,i.e.lesionsduetosubacromialfriction,viewed beforeusingtheshaverblade.Duringthepostoperativeperiod, thepatientscontinuallyusedapaddedabductionslingfor3
weeksand all underwent the same rehabilitationprotocol,
which consistedofanalgesia,rehabilitationoftherangeof motion(ROM)and,finally,strengthening.Thestrengthening
exercises were implemented after reaching the 60th
post-operative day, providedthat the passive ROMhad become
normal.
Results
The mean Constant score among the patients withbursal
lesions was 82.64±6.98 (range: 59.3–99) and with articular lesions,83.57±7.58(range:66–95),whilethemeanUCLAscore forthebursallesionswas33.37±2.85(range:21–35)andforthe articularlesions,32.83±2.95(range:22–35).Therewasno sta-tisticallysignificantdifferenceintheresultsaccordingtothe typeoflesion(Table3).UsingthevalidationofBoehm,28we foundthattheresultswereexcellentandgoodin47patients (73.5%),satisfactoryandfairin16(25%)andpoorinone(1.5%).
Using the UCLAcategories,wefoundthatthe resultswere
excellentandgoodin62patients(97%)andfairandpoorin two(3%).
Nosignificantdifferencesinthetypesandgradesoflesions wereobservedinrelationtothevariables ofprofessionand sport.Therewerealsonosignificantdifferencesinageatthe timeofthesurgery,inrelationtothefunctionalresults.The statisticalanalysisshowedthatitwasmorecommonforthe patientswithlow-gradelesionstoundergoadebridement pro-cedure(p<0.05),whileitwasmorecommonforthepatients withhigh-gradelesionstoundergorepairaftercompletionof thelesionindependentofthelocationatwhichthetendon wasaffected(Table4).
Table3–Resultsfromthefunctionalscorescomparedwiththetypeoflesion.
Parameter n Bursal n Articular p-Value
Mean SD Mean SD
Constant 35 82.64 6.98 29 83.57 7.58 0.318
UCLA 35 33.37 2.85 29 32.83 2.95 0.355
Theprobabilitiesofsignificance(pvalues)refertotheMann–Whitneytest.
Table4–Distributionoflesionsandtreatments.
Variable Typeoflesionandgrade p-Value
Low-gradebursal High-gradebursal
n % n %
Surgery 0.000
Debridement 10 83.4% 1 4.5%
Debridement+repair 1 8.3% 3 13.6%
Repairaftercompletionoflesion 1 8.3% 18 81.9%
Total 12 100% 22 100%
Variable Low-gradearticular High-gradearticular p-Value
n % n %
Surgery 0.010
Debridement 4 31% 0 0%
Debridement+repair 2 15.3% 4 23.5%
Repairaftercompletionoflesion 7 53.7% 13 76.5%
Total 13 100% 17 100%
Theprobabilitiesofsignificance(pvalues)refertothechi-squaretest.
again.Amongtheseunsatisfiedpatients,themeanConstant scorewas68.1±9.39(range:59.3–78)andtheUCLAscorewas 24±4.35(21–29).Nosignificantdifferencesinthefunctional resultswere observedinrelationtothe presenceof associ-atedlesionsthatweretreatedconcomitantlywiththetendon repair(Table5).
Amongthepostoperativecomplications,twopatients(3%) witharticularlesionspresentedrenewedtearing(oneofthem wasduetotrauma)andunderwentarthroscopicrepairagain, withsatisfactoryevolution.Anothertwopatients(3%) devel-opedadhesivecapsulitis,alsowithfavorableevolution.
Discussion
Partiallesionsoftherotatorcuffmaycausepainand
func-tional limitation of the shoulder. Most of the symptoms
occuratnightandduringactivitiesinvolvingeffortwithan upperlimbelevated.29Theyarepotentiallymorepainfulthan
complete lesions,possiblybecauseofthenon-physiological tensionthatiscreatedinthefibersoftheremnanttendon.30
Biomedical studies have demonstrated that after a partial
lesion of the rotator cuff occurs, the tension patterns in the fiberssurrounding thelesion becomealteredsuchthat lesion propagation is favored, even to the point of reach-ingacompletelesion.4,31–33Yamanakaetal.34demonstrated the progressionofpartialarticular lesionsover time. Forty patientswithlesionsofthistypewereevaluatedbymeansof arthrographyoverameanfollow-upperiodof412daysafter theinitialdiagnosishadbeenmade.Thelesionincreasedin sizein53%anditprogressedtoacompletelesionin28%ofthe cases.Thisprogressionprobablyoccurredthroughchangesto thetensionpatternsofthefibersintheremnanttendon,as observedinbiomechanicalstudies.31–33,35
Theinitialconservativetreatmentconsistsofrest,changes toactivities, useofanti-inflammatorydrugs,intra-articular infiltrationofcorticoidsandphysiotherapy.Whenthis treat-mentmethodfails,surgicalinterventionisindicated.29Inthe
Table5–Profileofthepatientsevaluatedandcategorizedaccordingtothepresenceofassociatedlesions.
Parameters n Withoutassociatedlesion n Withassociatedlesion p-Value
Mean SD Mean SD
Constant 46 83.42 7.29 18 82.13 7.15 0.289
UCLA 46 32.08 3.12 18 33.22 2.24 0.982
literature,manysurgical approaches forthistypeoflesion havebeendescribed,withvaryingfunctional results.12–24,29 Thetendencyhasbeentodebridethelow-gradelesionsand repairthehigh-gradelesions.However,thedatareportedso farhavebeenlimitedtomakingindicationsforaspecifictype oftreatmentforeachtypeandgradeoflesion.25
Ourstudywasbasedon64patientswhopresentedpartial lesions(bursalorarticular)ofthesupraspinatustendonalone andwhohadbeenoperatedbymeansofvideoarthroscopy.In ourseries,unlikewhatwefoundintheliterature,wehadmore patientswithpartialbursallesions(54.7%)thanwithpartial articularlesions(45.3%).2,29
Intheliterature,wefoundfour prospectivestudiesthat comparedthefunctionalresultsbetweentreatmentsof par-tialarticularandpartialbursallesions.12,15,23,36Intwoofthese studies,12,15 therewas nostatisticallysignificant difference
between the groups. Another study36 demonstrated better
resultsfrombursallesions,whilethelastofthesestudies23 founda highfailure rate amongthe bursallesions.Kartus etal.15foundameanpostoperativeConstantscoreof61.5in thegroupwithbursallesionsafterdebridementand acromio-plasty, whilethe score was 72 inthe group witharticular lesionsthatunderwentthesametreatment,butwithoutany statisticaldifference.Parketal.36observedthatafter debride-mentandacromioplasty,therewasanotablereductioninpain 6monthsaftertheoperation,inpatientswithbursallesions incomparisonwiththegroupwitharticularlesions.However,
this difference between the typesoflesion was not found
innewevaluationsthatweremadeafteroneand2yearsof follow-up.Itwasobservedinourstudythattherewasno dif-ferenceinthefunctional resultsbetweenthe patientswith regardtothelocationofthelesion(articularorbursal).
Cordascoetal.12observedahigherfailurerateinthegroup
withbursallesionstreatedwithdebridementand
acromio-plasty.Failure occurred in 29% ofthe patients with bursal lesions(4outof14shoulders)andin3%ofthepatientswith articular lesions (2 out of63 shoulders). IN another study, Kamathetal.23comparedtheresultsfrom42shouldersthat underwentrepairaftercompletionofthelesion(33with artic-ularlesionsandnine withbursallesions).Renewedtearing occurredin22.2%ofthepatientswithbursallesions, com-paredwith9.1%ofthepatientswitharticularlesions.
Inourstudy,weobservedrenewedtearingintwopatients witharticularlesions(3%)butnotinanyofthepatientswith bursallesions.
In1991,Snyderetal.7 evaluated31patientswithpartial
articularlesionswho underwentarthroscopic debridement,
withor without associatedacromioplasty. They found sat-isfactory results (mean UCLA score of 32 points), without anydifferencesintheresultsbetweenperforming subacro-mialdecompressionandnotdoingthis.Budoffetal.14found that86%oftheresultsweregoodorexcellent,accordingto
theUCLAscore,among62shouldersthatweretreatedwith
debridement of partial lesions of the rotator cuff, with or withoutacromioplasty.Kartusetal.15obtainedamean Con-stantscoreof65pointsfromevaluating26patientswhowere treatedbymeansofdebridementinassociationwith acromio-plasty.Theseauthorsattributedtheunsatisfactoryresultsto degenerationoftherotatorcuffovertheyearsandconcluded
thatacromioplasty hadnot protectedthe tendonfrom the
degenerativeprocess.Inourstudy,10outofthe11patients
whopresentedbursallesionsandunderwentdebridementin
association withacromioplastypresentedamean Constant
score of 84.06 (range: 78–89.4) and a mean UCLA score of
34.7(range:33–35),whichwereconsideredtobegoodresults. Theeffectontheresultsfromperformingornotperforming acromioplastycouldnotbecomparedstatistically,giventhat thisprocedurewasperformedinthecasesof95%ofallofthe patientsevaluated.
Weperformedrepairsaftercompletionofthelesionsin19 patientswithpartialbursallesions(29.6%)andin20patients withpartialarticularlesions(31.2%).Themeanscores
result-ing from these treatments were 81.78 (range: 59.3–99) and
32.97(range:21–35),respectively.In2007,Deutsch11evaluated
41 patientswithhigh-gradepartiallesions who underwent
repair afterthe lesionshad been completed. Aftera mean
follow-up of 38 months, significant improvements in pain
andfunctionalresultswereobserved,asassessedusingthe
scoreoftheAmericanShoulderandElbowSurgeons(ASES).
In2008,Poratetal.22usedthistechniquetotreat36patients withhigh-gradearticularlesionsandobtainedgoodand excel-lentresultsin83.3%ofthecases,asassessedusingtheUCLA score.In2009,Kamathetal.23demonstratedasatisfactionrate of93%among41patientswithhigh-gradearticularlesions whounderwentrepairaftercompletionofthelesions.These dataaresimilartotheresultsfoundbyourgroup,with100% satisfactionandgood/excellentresultswhentherepairwas performedaftercompletionofthelesionsinthehigh-grade cases.
Themainlimitationofthe presentstudy wasthe small samplesizefollowedup(64patients),incomparisonwiththe totalpopulationofpatientsoperated(704patients).This sit-uation occurredbecause ourservice receivespatients from manyregionsofthecountryand,thus,manyofthesepatients were unabletocomeinperson forthe evaluation. Further-more,becausethiswasaretrospectivestudy,wewereunable toobjectivelyobservetheevolutionofthefunctionalresults. Weconsider thatthepositive pointsofourstudy were the longfollow-up(meanof76months)inapopulationthatwas homogenousintermsofageanddemand,withspecific surgi-caltreatmentforeachtypeoflesionandasinglerehabilitation protocol.
Conclusion
Thevideoarthroscopictreatmentofthesepartiallesionsofthe rotatorcuffpresentedgoodorexcellentresultswhenthe low-gradelesionsweredebridedandthehigh-gradelesionswere repairedaftercompletion.Theseresultsweremaintainedover thelongterm,withahighsatisfactionrateandfew compli-cations.Nostatisticallysignificantdifferenceswereobserved betweentheresultsfromthearticularandbursallesions,or betweenthegradesoflesion.Long-termrandomized prospec-tivestudiescomparingthetechniquesoftranstendonrepair andrepairaftercompletionofthelesionbecomenecessary.
Conflicts
of
interest
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1. EllmanH.Diagnosisandtreatmentofincompleterotatorcuff tears.ClinOrthopRelatRes.1990;(254):64–74.
2. FukudaH,HamadaK,NakajimaT,TomonagaA.Pathology andpathogenesisoftheintratendinoustearingoftherotator cuffviewedfromenblochistologicsections.ClinOrthop RelatRes.1994;(304):60–7.
3. RuotoloC,FowJE,NottageWM.Thesupraspinatusfootprint: ananatomicstudyofthesupraspinatusinsertion.
Arthroscopy.2004;20(3):246–9.
4. ClarkJM,HarrymanDT2nd.Tendons,ligaments,andcapsule oftherotatorcuff:grossandmicroscopicanatomy.JBone JointSurgAm.1992;74(5):713–25.
5. FukudaH.Themanagementofpartial-thicknesstearsofthe rotatorcuff.JBoneJointSurgBr.2003;85(1):3–11.
6. GartsmanGM,MilneJC.Articularsurfacepartial-thickness rotatorcufftears.JShoulderElbowSurg.1995;4(6):409–15. 7. SnyderSJ,PachelliAF,DelPizzoW,FriedmanMJ,FerkelRD,
PatteeG.Partialthicknessrotatorcufftears:resultsof arthroscopictreatment.Arthroscopy.1991;7(1):1–7. 8. EllmanH,KaySP.Arthroscopicsubacromialdecompression
forchronicimpingement.Two-tofive-yearresults.JBone JointSurgBr.1991;73(3):395–8.
9. EschJC,OzerkisLR,HelgagerJA,KaneN,LilliottN.
Arthroscopicsubacromialdecompression:resultsaccording tothedegreeofrotatorcufftear.Arthroscopy.1988;4(4):241–9. 10.RoyeRP,GranaWA,YatesCK.Arthroscopicsubacromial
decompression:twotoseven-yearfollow-up.Arthroscopy. 1995;11(3):301–6.
11.DeutschA.Arthroscopicrepairofpartial-thicknesstearsof therotatorcuff.JShoulderElbowSurg.2007;16(2):193–201. 12.CordascoFA,BackerM,CraigEV,KleinD,WarrenRF.The
partial-thicknessrotatorcufftear:isacromioplastywithout repairsufficient?AmJSportsMed.2002;30(2):257–60. 13.LiemD,AlciS,DedyN,SteinbeckJ,MarquardtB,Mollenhoff
G.Clinicalandstructuralresultsofpartialsupraspinatus tearstreatedbysubacromialdecompressionwithoutrepair. KneeSurgSportsTraumatolArthrosc.2008;16(10):967–72. 14.BudoffJE,RodinD,OchiaiD,NirschlRP.Arthroscopicrotator
cuffdebridementwithoutdecompressionforthetreatment oftendinosis.Arthroscopy.2005;21(9):1081–9.
15.KartusJ,KartusC,Rostgard-ChristensenL,SernertN,ReadJ, PerkoM.Long-termclinicalandultrasoundevaluationafter arthroscopicacromioplastyinpatientswithpartialrotator cufftears.Arthroscopy.2006;22(1):44–9.
16.IdeJ,MaedaS,TakagiK.Arthroscopictranstendonrepairof partial-thicknessarticular-sidetearsoftherotatorcuff: anatomicalandclinicalstudy.AmJSportsMed. 2005;33(11):1672–9.
17.WaiblB,BuessE.Partial-thicknessarticularsurface supraspinatustears:anewtranstendonsuturetechnique. Arthroscopy.2005;21(3):376–81.
18.CastagnaA,DelleRoseG,ContiM,SnyderSJ,BorroniM, GarofaloR.Predictivefactorsofsubtleresidualshoulder symptomsaftertranstendinousarthroscopiccuffrepair:a clinicalstudy.AmJSportsMed.2009;37(1):103–8.
19.CastriciniR,PanfoliN,NittoliR,SpurioS,PiraniO. Transtendonarthroscopicrepairofpartial-thickness,
articularsurfacetearsofthesupraspinatus:resultsat2years. ChirOrganiMov.2009;93(Suppl1):S49–54.
20.SpencerEEJr.Partial-thicknessarticularsurfacerotatorcuff tears:anall-insiderepairtechnique.ClinOrthopRelatRes. 2010;(468):1514–20.
21.DuraldeXA,McClellandWBJr.Theclinicalresultsof arthroscopictranstendinousrepairofgradeIIIpartial articular-sidedsupraspinatustendontears.Arthroscopy. 2012;28(2):160–8.
22.PoratS,NottageWM,FouseMN.Repairofpartialthickness rotatorcufftears:aretrospectivereviewwithminimumtwo yearfollow-up.JShoulderElbowSurg.2008;17(5):729–31. 23.KamathG,GalatzLM,KeenerJD,TeefeyS,MiddletonW,
YamaguchiK.Tendonintegrityandfunctionaloutcomeafter arthroscopicrepairofhigh-gradepartial-thickness
supraspinatustears.JBoneJointSurgAm.2009;91(5): 1055–62.
24.TauberM,KollerH,ReschH.Transosseousarthroscopicrepair ofpartialarticularsurfacesupraspinatustendontears.Knee SurgSportsTraumatolArthrosc.2008;16(6):608–13.
25.StraussEJ,SalataMJ,KercherJ,BarkerJU,McGillK,BachBRJr, etal.Thearthroscopicmanagementofpartial-thickness rotatorcufftears:asystematicreviewoftheliterature. Arthroscopy.2011;27(4):568–80.
26.ConstantCR,MurleyAH.Aclinicalmethodoffunctional assessmentoftheshoulder.ClinOrthopRelatRes. 1987;(214):160–4.
27.EllmanH,HankerG,BayerM.Repairofrotatorcuff.Factors influencingreconstruction.JBoneJointSurgAm.
1986;68(8):1136–44.
28.BoehmD.ValuationoftheConstantscore.In:HabermeyerP, MagoschP,LichtenbergS,editors.Classificationsandscores oftheshoulder.Heidelberg:Springer;2006.p.204.
29.WolffAB,SethiP,SuttonKM,CoveyAS,MagitDP,Medvecky M.Partial-thicknessrotatorcufftears.JAmAcadOrthop Surg.2006;14(13):715–25.
30.HalderAM,O’DriscollSW,HeersG,MuraN,ZobitzME,AnKN, etal.Biomechanicalcomparisonofeffectsofsupraspinatus tendondetachments,tendondefects,andmuscleretractions. JBoneJointSurgAm.2002;84(5):780–5.
31.BeyMJ,RamseyML,SoslowskyLJ.Intratendinousstrainfields ofthesupraspinatustendon:effectofasurgicallycreated articular-surfacerotatorcufftear.JShoulderElbowSurg. 2002;11(6):562–9.
32.ReillyP,AmisAA,WallaceAL,EmeryRJ.Supraspinatustears: propagationandstrainalteration.JShoulderElbowSurg. 2003;12(2):134–8.
33.Andarawis-PuriN,RicchettiET,SoslowskyLJ.Rotatorcuff tendonstraincorrelateswithtearpropagation.JBiomech. 2009;42(2):158–63.
34.YamanakaK,MatsumotoT.Thejointsidetearoftherotator cuff.Afollowupstudybyarthrography.ClinOrthopRelatRes. 1994;(304):68–73.
35.MazzoccaAD,RinconLM,O’ConnorRW,ObopilweE, AndersenM,GeaneyL,etal.Intra-articularpartial-thickness rotatorcufftears:analysisofinjuredandrepairedstrain behavior.AmJSportsMed.2008;36(1):110–6.