• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Leaf gas exchange and yield of three upland rice cultivars

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "Leaf gas exchange and yield of three upland rice cultivars"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texto

Loading

Imagem

Table 1. Grain yield and yield components of ‘Caiapó’, ‘Primavera’ and ‘Maravilha’ upland rice cultivars, cultivated in Botucatu‑SP, Brazil,  from January to June 2002
Figure 4. Mean values (n = 7 plants) of total dry matter accumulation  in ‘Caiapó’, ‘Primavera’ and ‘Maravilha’ upland rice cultivars, between  PI and FL (a), between FL and MA (b) and throughout the plant  cycle of each cultivar (c)
Figure 5. Minimum, medium and maximum air temperature (a), and daily rainfall (b) observed in the field, from emergency (0 DAE) up  to the maturation in ‘Caiapó’, ‘Primavera’ and ‘Maravilha’ upland rice cultivars.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The average natural crossing rate of the upland rice cultivar Guarani to the IAC 201 at a distance of 0.5 m at the environmental conditions of Recife and Carpina counties, state

Rice plant dry mass, leaf N content and plant height for upland rice planted in succession with single corn crop or corn intercropped with grassy or legume species, as a function

The dry matter yield (root, leaf, sheaths and leaf blade) and plant architecture (angle of leaf insertion and leaf arc) were evaluated in rice plants grown in nutrient solutions

the following yield parameters were evaluated: a) number of panicles per m 2 - count of panicles per meter in one row of the evaluated area and extrapolated to square meters;

Total yield (TY) and commercial yield (CY) of roots, root dry matter (RDM) and leaf dry matter (LDM), root dry matter content (RDMC), and ratio of root dry matter and leaf dry

The objective of this research was to determine the influence of zinc, manganese and copper on shoot dry matter yield and uptake of macro and mi- cronutrients in upland rice,

Predictive accuracy of the GGE biplot models considering the use of the mean phenotypic and genotypic values estimated by the REML/BLUP method for 20 rice genotypes evaluated in

Ranking, genotype, genotypic effect ( g ), predicted genotypic values ( u+g ), and increase in the general mean of the cultivars and the mean genotypic values in the