ht t p : / / w w w . b j m i c r o b i o l . c o m . b r /
Food
Microbiology
Multidrug
resistance
and
ESBL-producing
Salmonella
spp.
isolated
from
broiler
processing
plants
Rosangela
Estel
Ziech
a,∗,
Camila
Lampugnani
a,
Ana
Paula
Perin
a,
Mallu
Jagnow
Sereno
a,
Ricardo
Antônio
Pilegi
Sfaciotte
b,
Cibeli
Viana
a,
Vanessa
Mendonc¸a
Soares
c,
José
Paes
de
Almeida
Nogueira
Pinto
c,
Luciano
dos
Santos
Bersot
aaProgramadePós-Graduac¸ãoemCiênciaAnimal,UniversidadeFederaldoParaná(UFPR),RuaPioneiron◦2153,BairroJardimDallas,
Palotina,PR85950-000,Brazil
bUniversidadeFederaldoParaná(UFPR),RuaPioneiron◦2153,BairroJardimDallas,Palotina,PR85950-000,Brazil
cUniversidadeEstadualPaulistaJúliodeMesquitaFilho(UNESP),FaculdadedeMedicinaVeterináriaeZootecniadeBotucatu,
DistritodeRubiãoJúniors/n,BotucatuSP18618-000,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received16December2014 Accepted24July2015
AssociateEditor:EduardoCesar Tondo
Keywords:
Antimicrobialresistance Salmonellaspp.
Foodbornepathogens
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Theaimofthisstudywastoinvestigatetheoccurrenceofmultidrug-resistant,extended spectrumbeta-lactamase(ESBL)producingSalmonellaspp.isolatedfromconveyorbeltsof broilercuttingroomsinBrazilianbroilerprocessingplants.Ninety-eightstrainsofSalmonella spp.wereanalyzed.Multidrugresistancewasdeterminedbythediskdiffusiontestand the susceptibilityoftheisolated bacteriawasevaluatedagainst18 antimicrobialsfrom sevendifferentclasses.ThedoublediskdiffusiontestwasusedtoevaluateESBL produc-tion.Ofthe98strainstested,84weremultidrugresistant.Thehighestratesofresistance wereagainstnalidixicacid(95%),tetracycline(91%),andthebeta-lactams:ampicillinand cefachlor(45%),followedbystreptomycinandgentamicinwith19%and15%ofstrain resis-tance,respectively.Bycontrast,97%ofthestrainsweresensitivetochloramphenicol.45% ofthestrainswerepositiveforthepresenceofESBLactivity.Inthisstudy,highratesof multidrugresistanceandESBLproductionwereobservedinSalmonellaspp.
©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisis anopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:[email protected](R.E.Ziech).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2015.11.021
1517-8382/©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
Salmonellaspp.isoneofthemainagentsresponsiblefor sev-eralinfections,e.g.,foodbornegastroenteritis.Mostofthese infections cause self-limiting diarrhea and do not require antimicrobialtreatment.However,incertaincases,suchas when thebacterium is spread via blood stream leading to complicationssuchasmeningitis,antibiotictherapyis nec-essary.Suchcomplicationsaremostcommonlyobservedin childrenandelderlyandimmunecompromisedpatients. Flu-oroquinolonesandcephalosporinsarethedrugsoffirst-choice insuchcases.1
Food ofanimal origin, especially poultryderived items, arethe mainsourcesofinfectionbySalmonellaspp.2 Given theimportancetoSalmonellaspp.ascausativeagentsinfood bornediseases,reductionofitscontaminationonbroiler car-cassesisofextremelyhigh priority forindustry aswell as regulatoryagencies.3TheoccurrenceofSalmonellaspp.onthe broilercarcassesmight bearesultofcontaminationeither at the farm or cross-contamination within the processing plant.4Cross-contaminationcanbeattributedpartlyto resid-ual bacteria remaining on surfaces and equipment after sanitization.5
Studies on Salmonella spp. are usually focused on ana-lyzing resistance of the bacterium to antimicrobials such as fluoroquinolones; but, in the last decade or so, bac-terial production of large spectrum beta-lactamases has alsobeen evaluated.6,7 In Enterobacteriaceae,resistance to cephalosporins isgenerally attributedto the productionof largespectrumbeta-lactamasessuchasESBL(extended spec-trumbeta-lactamase)andAmpCbeta-lactamase.8ESBListhe termused forany beta-lactamasethat isacquiredand not intrinsictoaspecies.Suchlactamasesquicklyhydrolyzeand confer resistanceagainst oxyimino-cephalosporins.Mutant beta-lactamasesthathavesimilaractivityarealsoreferredto asESBLs.9,10
ExtensivestudieshavebeenundertakentoanalyzeESBL productionbyKlebsiellaspp.,Enterobacterspp.,andEscherichia coli isolated from human clinical samples. These studies are prompted by the lack of therapeutic success against thesemicroorganisms,whichincludes,butnotrestrictedto, cephalosporins.Treatment isrenderedunsuccessful bythe acquisitionofresistancegenesthatresideonmobilegenetic elements. For example, plasmids that transmit resistance genesforcephalosporinsarefrequentlyfoundtocarry resis-tancetootherantibiotics,suchasfluoroquinolones.11Some authorshavealsoreportedESBLsinmicroorganismsisolated fromfoodproducts.12–14AccordingtoBlancetal.(2006),these findingsaremorerecentinthecaseofE.coliandSalmonella spp.ascomparedtoKlebsiellaspp.andEnterobacterspp.ESBL productionbySalmonellaspp.isolatedfromanimalshasalso beenreported15,16;although,thereportsonESBLfromanimal originarelessfrequent.17,18
Due tothe public healthrisk ofcross-contamination, it is important to have sufficient information on the occur-renceofpathogens,e.g.,Salmonellaspp.,inthecuttingrooms forbroilerprocessingand slaughteringfacilities.Itis espe-ciallyimportanttohaveknowledgeofthebehaviorofthese strains against antimicrobials. Therefore, the objective of
this study was to determine the occurrence of multidrug resistant in ESBL-producing Salmonella spp. isolated from conveyor belts in the cutting rooms of broiler processing plants.
Materials
and
methods
IsolationandidentificationofSalmonellaspp.
Strains of Salmonella spp. were obtained from the cutting roomsoffourdifferentBrazilianbroilerprocessingand export-ingplantshavingaslaughteringcapacityinexcessof160,000 broilers/day.FortheisolationofSalmonellaspp.fromthe sur-faceoftheconveyorbelts,thesponges(NascoWhirl-PakTM), pre-moistenedwith10mLof0.1%salinepeptonewater,were utilizedona400cm2area.Salmonellaspp.detectionwas
car-riedoutaccordingtotheFoodandDrugAdministration(FDA– USA)methodologyaspublishedintheBacteriological Analyt-icalManual.19Subsequenttothesetests,isolatesofSalmonella spp.wereconfirmedbygenusidentificationusingpolymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the sifB gene as per the protocol describedbyAlmeidaetal.20
Antimicrobialsusceptibilitytest
The susceptibility to antimicrobials was determined using the agar diffusion test as per the documents M31-A321 and M100-S2322 of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Eighteen antimicrobial agents from seven dif-ferent classes were tested: (1) Beta-lactams, divided into 3 subclasses: (a) Penicillins: ampicillin (AMP; 10g), (b) Cephalosporins: cefachlor (CFC; 30g) and ceftiofur (CTF; 30g), and (c) Carbapenems: meropenem (MER;10g) and imipenem (IPM; 10g); (2) Aminoglycosides: streptomycin (EST; 10g), tobramycin (TOB; 10g), gentamycin (GEN; 10g), amikacin (AMI; 30g) and neomycin (NEO; 30g); (3)Quinolones:enrofloxacin(ENO;5g),nalidixicacid(NAL; 30g),andciprofloxacin(CIP;5g);(4)Sulfamethoxazoleand Trimethoprim:sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SUT; 25g); (5)Tetracyclines:tetracycline(TET;30g);(6)Phenicols: chlor-amphenicol (CLO;30g) and florfenicol(FLF; 30g) and (7) Polymyxins:polymyxinB(POL,300UI).Strainswere consid-eredmultidrugresistantiftheywereresistanttoatleastthree classes ofantimicrobials(atleastoneantimicrobialofeach class).23 Thequalitycontroltest wasbasedon E.coliATCC 25922.
ESBLproduction
ESBL productionwasanalyzedbythedoublediskdiffusion test.24Thecentraldiskwashavingamoxicillinplusclavulanic acid(AMX/AC;20/10g).Fourotherdiskswereplacedwithin a20mmradiusofthefirstone:ceftazidime(CAZ;30g), cef-triaxone(CRO;30g),cefepime(CPM,30g)and aztreonam (ATM; 30g).25 Samples were considered positive for ESBL whentheinhibitionzonearoundanycephalosporinincreased towardthecentraldiskwithAMX/AC,andwhentheinhibition zonearoundatleastoneofthecephalosporinswassmaller than19mm.26
Results
Outofthe98strainsevaluated(26,23,19,and30fromeachof thefourcuttingrooms,respectively),threeweresensitivetoall antimicrobialstested,fourwereresistanttooneclass,seven wereresistanttotwoclasses,and84(86%)wereconsidered multidrugresistant.
Fig.1showstheresistanceprofilesofthemultidrug resis-tant strainsarranged accordingto the roomof origin,and the corresponding percentage profiles in each room. ESBL activitywasdetectedin45%ofthestrains.Fromthestrains positiveforESBLproduction,themostfrequentresistance pro-filewasagainstbeta-lactams,quinolones,and tetracyclines (38/44);theESBL-negativestrainswereresistantto aminogly-cosides,quinolones,andtetracyclines(36/54).Theresultsfor Salmonellaspp.antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestarepresented inFig.2.
Thestrains,sensitivetoallantimicrobials(3/98),originated fromRoom3and represented16% (3/19)ofthe total num-berofstrainsisolatedfromthisroom.Thesamepercentage ofresistancewasobservedforonlyoneortwoantimicrobial classesand52%(10/19)strainsweremultidrugresistant. How-ever,inRooms1,2,and4,100%(26/26),87%(20/23),and93% (28/30),respectively,oftheSalmonellaspp.strainswere mul-tidrugresistant.ThehighestnumbersofESBL-positivestrain wereisolatedfromRoom4,correspondingto54%(24/44)of thepositivestrains.
Room 1 2 3 4 ESBL β -LA C AMI QU I
SUT TET POL No
6
Resistance profile*
3 14 2 1 5 15 5 1 4 22 1 1 3 1 3 10 3 3 73 21 5 26 65 22 4 8 54 12 23 %Fig.1–ResistanceprofileofmultidrugresistantSalmonella
spp.strainsasperESBLanalysisandcuttingroomof origin.*B-LAC,B-lactams;AMI,aminoglycosides;QUI, quinolones;SUT,sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim;TET, tetracyclines;POL,polymixin.
Discussion
Recently,incidenceofantimicrobialresistanceinSalmonella spp.isolatedfromfoodsofanimalorigin,especiallypoultry products, has increased.27–29 In this study, all strainswere sensitivetociprofloxacinand95%ofthemwereresistantto nalidixicacid (Fig. 2).Hamidiamet al.30 suggestedthat the lowinvitroresistancetociprofloxacinmaybeduetoa muta-tioninthegyrAgeneandthatinvitroresistancetonalidixic acid maybeusedtodetecttheactuallevelofresistanceto ciprofloxacin.TheCLSI22recommendsthatresistancetothis classofantimicrobialsshouldbeconsideredascollective,that is,resistancetoonedrugimpliesthatthemicroorganismis resistanttothewholeclass.Thisinformationisofgreat impor-tancebecausefluoroquinolonesareconsideredasthedrugof firstchoiceforthetreatmentofinfectionscausedbySalmonella spp.inhuman.31
Highlevelsofresistancewerealsoobservedagainst tetra-cycline(Fig.2).WorldwideincidenceofresistanceinSalmonella spp. isolated from the poultry production chain is vari-able withpercentages rangingfrom 96.6% to 21.8%.32–34 In Brazil, Oliveira et al.35 reported low resistance indexes in Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from humans, poultry car-casses,poultry-relatedsamples,and fooditemsinvolvedin foodbornedisease outbreaksinthesouthernregionofthe country.
Additionally, 97% ofthe strainstested were sensitiveto chloramphenicol(Fig.2),whichisoneofthefirstdrugsused inveterinarymedicineandwhichhasbeenbannedfrom ani-malproductioninBrazilsince1998.36Theuseoftetracycline asagrowthpromoterinpoultryproductionisalsoprohibited inBrazil.37
All strains were sensitive to the carbapenems tested; this isan importantfinding because carbapenemsare the drugs of first choice in the treatment of ESBL-producing microorganisms.38 ESBL production was detected in 45% (44/98)ofthestrains. TheseESBL-positivestrainswerealso multidrug resistant. Clemente et al.17 analyzed 1120 iso-lates of Salmonella spp. from food items of animal origin and found onlyfive ESBL-producing strains. However,they usedamethodologythatwasdifferentfromthepresentone. Nogueira-Mirandaetal.10comparedsixmethodologiesforthe detectionofESBLinEnterobacterspp.andconcludedthatthe double disk diffusion testshowed sensitivity of89.2% and specificityof100%forthisspecies.Duetotheabsenceofa standardmethodologyapprovedbyanyoftheinternational committeesfortheevaluationofSalmonellaspp.,ESBL produc-tionmayresultinunderestimationoftheoccurrenceofthis phenotype.Itisalsodifficulttocomparedifferentstudies.The phenotypicconfirmatorytestsarehighlysensitiveand spe-cificascomparedtothegenotypicconfirmatorytests.39This study wasaimedtoscreenESBLproducing organisms. Fur-ther researchisrequiredforthe genotypiccharacterization ofESBL-producingSalmonellaspp.foundinbroilerprocessing plants.
Inconclusion,thepresentstudydemonstratedmultidrug resistancein86%andESBLactivityin45%oftheSalmonella spp.isolatedfromthestudiedbroilerprocessingplants.These resultsshouldbetakenasaprecautionarywarningforthe
AMP POL 0% FLF CLO TET SUT CIP NAL ENO NEO AMI GEN TOB EST IPM MER CTF CFC 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
Susceptible Intermediate Resistant
Fig.2–PercentagesrecordedfortheantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestofSalmonellaspp.strainsisolatedfromcuttingrooms ofbroilerprocessingplants.AMP,ampicillin;CFC,cephachlor;CTF,ceftiofur;MER,meropenem;IPM,imipenem;EST, streptomycin;TOB,tobramycin;GEN,gentamycin;AMI,amikacin;NEO,neomycin;ENO,enrofloxacin;NAL,nalidixicacid; CIP,ciprofloxacin;SUT,sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim;TET,tetracycline;CLO,chloramphenicol;FLF,florfenicol;POL, polymyxinB.
spreadofmultidrugresistantSalmonellaspp.inbroiler pro-ductionindustry.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
Acknowledgment
WearegratefultoLaboratóriodeInspec¸ãoeControlede Qual-idadedeAlimentoseÁgua,UniversidadeFederaldoParaná (UFPR)forsubsidizingthepurchasematerialsforthisstudy.
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1. MiriagouV,TassiosPT,LegakisNJ,TzouvelekisLS.
Expanded-spectrumcephalosporinresistancein
non-typhoidSalmonella.IntJAntimicrobAgents.
2004;23:547–555.
2. GreigJD,RavelA.Analysisoffoodborneoutbreakdata
reportedinternationallyforsourceattribution.IntJFood
Microbiol.2009;130:77–87.
3. BerrangME,BaileyJS,AltekruseSF,etal.Prevalence,
serotype,andantimicrobialresistanceofSalmonellaon
broilercarcassespostpickandpostchillin20U.S.processing
plants.JFoodProt.2009;72:1610–1615.
4. RasschaertG,HoufK,GodardC,WildemauweC,
Pastuszczak-FrakM,DeZutterL.Contaminationofcarcasses
withSalmonelladuringpoultryslaughter.JFoodProt.
2008;71:146–152.
5.RasschaertG,HoufK,DeZutterL.Impactoftheslaughter
linecontaminationonthepresenceofSalmonellaonbroiler
carcasses.JApplMicrobiol.2007;103:333–341.
6.ThrelfallEJ.AntimicrobialdrugresistanceinSalmonella:
problemsandperspectivesinfood-andwater-borne
infections.FEMSMicrobiolRev.2002;26:141–148.
7.LiXZ,MehrotraM,GhimireS,AdewoyeL.Beta-lactam
resistanceandbeta-lactamasesinbacteriaofanimalorigin.
VetMicrobiol.2007;121:197–214.
8.deJongA,SmetA,LudwigC,etal.Antimicrobial
susceptibilityofSalmonellaisolatesfromhealthypigsand
chickens(2008–2011).VetMicrobiol.2014;171:298–306.
9.LivermoreDM.Defininganextended-spectrum
beta-lactamase.ClinMicrobiolInfect.2008;14(suppl1):3–10.
10.Nogueira-MirandaKS,PalmeiroJK,ConteD,etal.Detection
ofextended-spectrum-lactamaseinEnterobacterspp.–
evaluationofsixphenotypictests.MicrobDrugResist.
2012;18:66–70.
11.NogueiraKS,PaganiniMC,ConteA,etal.Emergenceof
extended-spectrum-lactamaseproducingEnterobacterspp.
inpatientswithbacteremiainatertiaryhospitalinsouthern
Brazil.EnfermInfeccMicrobiolClin.2014;32:87–92.
12.CohenStuartJ,vandenMunckhofT,VoetsG,ScharringaJ,
FluitA,HallMLV.ComparisonofESBLcontaminationin
organicandconventionalretailchickenmeat.IntJFood
Microbiol.2012;154:212–214.
13.RyuSH,LeeJH,ParkSH,etal.Antimicrobialresistance
profilesamongEscherichiacolistrainsisolatedfrom
commercialandcookedfoods.IntJFoodMicrobiol.
2012;159:263–266.
14.Ojer-UsozE,GonzálezD,VitasAI,etal.Prevalenceof
EnterobacteriaceaeinmeatproductssoldinNavarra,Spain.
MeatSci.2013;93:316–321.
15.ClementeL,CorreiaI,ThemudoP,NetoI,Canic¸aM,Bernardo
F.AntimicrobialsusceptibilityofSalmonellaentericaisolates
fromhealthybreederandbroilerflocksinPortugal.VetJ.
2014;200:276–281.
16.JiangHX,SongL,LiuJ,etal.Multipletransmissiblegenes
encodingfluoroquinoloneandthird-generation
cephalosporinresistanceco-locatedinnon-typhoidal
Salmonellaisolatedfromfood-producinganimalsinChina.
IntJAntimicrobAgents.2014;43:242–247.
17.ClementeL,ManageiroV,FerreiraE,etal.Occurrenceof
extended-spectrum-lactamasesamongisolatesof
Salmonellaentericasubsp.entericafromfood-producing
animalsandfoodproducts,inPortugal.IntJFoodMicrobiol.
2013;167:221–228.
18.EgervärnM,BörjessonS,ByforsS,etal.Escherichiacoliwith
extended-spectrumbeta-lactamasesortransferableAmpC
beta-lactamasesandSalmonellaonmeatimportedinto
Sweden.IntJFoodMicrobiol.2014;171:8–14.
19.AndrewsW,HammackT.Salmonella.In:Bacteriological
AnalyticalManual[s.l.].U.S.FoodandDrugAdministration; 2007.
20.deAlmeidaMV,SilvaAJr,NeroLA.Evaluationoftarget
sequencesforthepolymerasechainreaction-based
detectionofSalmonellainartificiallycontaminatedbeef.
FoodbornePathogDis.2014;11:111–118.
21.CLSI.PerformanceStandardsforAntimicrobialDiskandDilution
SusceptibilityTestsforBacteriaIsolatedfromAnimals.Aproved Standard.CLSIDocumentM31-A3.3rded.Wayne,PA:Clinical
andLaboratoryStandardsInstitute;2008.
22.CLSI.PerformanceStandardsforAntimicrobialSusceptibility
Testing.23rdInformationalSupplement.CLSIDocument M100-S23.Wayne,PA:ClinicalandLaboratoryStandards
Institute;2013.
23.NgoiST,ThongKL.Molecularcharacterizationshowed
limitedgeneticdiversityamongSalmonellaEnteritidisisolated
fromhumansandanimalsinMalaysia.DiagnMicrobiolInfect
Dis.2013;77:304–311.
24.PitoutJDD,ReisbigMD,VenterEC,ChurchDL,HansonND.
Modificationofthedouble-disktestfordetectionof
enterobacteriaceaeproducingextended-spectrumand
AmpC-lactamases.JClinMicrobiol.2003;41:3933–3935.
25.SousaMAJr,FerreiraEV,Conceic¸ãoGC.Betalactamasede
espectroestendido(ESBL):umimportantemecanismode
resistênciabacterianaesuadetecc¸ãonolaboratórioclínico.
NewsLab.2004;63:152–174.
26.EUCAST.EuropeanCommitteeonAntimicrobialSusceptibility
TestingGuidelinesforDetectionofResistanceMechanismsand SpecificResistancesofClinicaland/orEpidemiologicalImportance.
EuropeanSocietyofClinicalMicrobiologyandInfectious
Diseases:Sweden;2013.
27.AntunesP,RéuC,SousaJC,PeixeL,PestanaN.Incidenceof
Salmonellafrompoultryproductsandtheirsusceptibilityto
antimicrobialagents.IntJFoodMicrobiol.2003;82:97–103.
28.HurJ,KimJH,ParkJH,LeeYJ,LeeJH.Molecularandvirulence
characteristicsofmulti-drugresistantSalmonellaEnteritidis
strainsisolatedfrompoultry.VetJ.2011;189:
306–311.
29.BacciC,BoniE,AlpigianiI,LanzoniE,BonardiS,BrindaniF.
Phenotypicandgenotypicfeaturesofantibioticresistancein
Salmonellaentericaisolatedfromchickenmeatandchicken
andquailcarcasses.IntJFoodMicrobiol.2012;160:
16–23.
30.HamidianM,TajbakhshM,TohidpourA,RahbarM,ZaliMR,
Walther-RasmussenJ.DetectionofnovelgyrAmutationsin
nalidixicacid-resistantisolatesofSalmonellaentericafrom
patientswithdiarrhoea.IntJAntimicrobAgents.
2011;37:360–364.
31.PokharelBM,KoiralaJ,DahalRK,MishraSK,KhadgaPK,
TuladharNR.Multidrug-resistantandextended-spectrum
beta-lactamase(ESBL)-producingSalmonellaenterica
(serotypesTyphiandParatyphiA)frombloodisolatesin
Nepal:surveillanceofresistanceandasearchfornewer
alternatives.IntJInfectDis.2006;10:434–438.
32.ManieT,KhanS,BrözelVS,VeithWJ,GouwsPA.
Antimicrobialresistanceofbacteriaisolatedfrom
slaughteredandretailchickensinSouthAfrica.LettAppl
Microbiol.1998;26:253–258.
33.Carrami ˜nanaJJ,RotaC,AgustínI,HerreraA.Highprevalence
ofmultipleresistancetoantibioticsinSalmonellaserovars
isolatedfromapoultryslaughterhouseinSpain.Vet
Microbiol.2004;104:133–139.
34.ThaiTH,HiraiT,LanNT,YamaguchiR.Antibioticresistance
profilesofSalmonellaserovarsisolatedfromretailporkand
chickenmeatinNorthVietnam.IntJFoodMicrobiol.
2012;156:147–151.
35.DiasdeOliveiraS,SiqueiraFloresF,dosSantosLR,Brandelli
A.AntimicrobialresistanceinSalmonellaenteritidisstrains
isolatedfrombroilercarcasses,food,humanand
poultry-relatedsamples.IntJFoodMicrobiol.2005;97:
297–305.
36.Brasil.Portarian.448,de10desetembrode1998.Dispõe sobreaproibic¸ãodefabricac¸ão,importac¸ão,comercializac¸ão eoempregodepreparac¸õesfarmacêuticasdeuso
veterinário,derac¸ões,edeaditivosalimentaresque especificaerevogaaportariaquemenciona.Ministérioda AgriculturaeAbastecimento,Brasília;1998.
37.Brasil.Portarian◦159,de23dejunhode1992.Dispõesobrea proibic¸ãodousodeclortetraciclina,oxitetraciclinae penicilinacomopromotoresdecrescimento.Ministérioda AgriculturaeAbastecimento,Brasília.
38.ZhanelGG,WiebeR,DilayL,etal.Comparativereviewofthe
carbapenems.Drugs.2007;67:1027–1052.
39.PatersonDL,BonomoRA.Extended-spectrum
beta-lactamases:aclinicalupdate.ClinMicrobiolRev.