ABSTRACT
InvitedR
eview
laryngealcancerinBrazil
DepartmentofEpidemiology,FaculdadedeSaúdePública,Universidade
deSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,Brazil
INTRODUCTION
Laryngealcancerisgenerallyuncommon inmalesandveryrareinfemales.Laryngeal tumorsrepresentaround2.0%ofallcancers in Brazil, corresponding to approximately 8,000newcasesannually.1Theyaccountfor
3.8%inmenand0.6%inwomenofalldeaths by cancer, corresponding to around 3,000 deathsannually.2Thediseaseispredominantly
foundinpatientsagedfrom50to70years, althoughindevelopingcountriesmanycases arediagnosedinindividualsintheirfifthde-cadeoflife.Inacase-controlstudyconducted in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo, betweenJanuary1999andDecember2001, 63%ofthelaryngealcancercasesoccurred intheagegroupfrom50to70years.3The
lifetimerisk(30-74years)oflaryngealcancer amongmaleshasbeenfoundtobelessthan 1%inmostcountriesforthegenerationborn in1915.ButinSãoPaulothelifetimerisk forthe1915cohortwasfoundtobegreater than1%.4
Canceratthisanatomicalsitewasrarely diagnosed until about 1860, when Garcia developed the laryngoscope.5 Although the
larynxmaybethesiteofprimaryneoplasms suchassarcomas,adenocarcinomas,cylindro-mas,lymphomasorhistiocytomas,theseare rare. Laryngeal cancer relates almost exclu-sivelytosquamouscellcarcinomaofvarying degreesofhistologicaldifferentiation.Inthe case-control study previously mentioned,3
outofatotalof129casesoflaryngealcancer screened in seven hospitals in the city of São Paulo, 121 (93.7%) were classified as squamouscellcarcinoma.Another0.8%was
classified as nonspecific “carcinoma”, 0.8% as verrucous carcinoma, 0.8% as tubular adenocarcinomaand0.8%asneuroendocrine carcinoma.Theremainingfourcases(3.1%) hadtumorsassociatedwithboththelarynx andthepharynx(datanotpublished).Inthis review the term laryngeal cancer relates to squamouscellcarcinoma.
Thelarynxisdividedintothreeanatomi- calregions:supraglottic,glotticandsubglot-tic larynx.The glottis consists of the true vocalcordsandthemucosaoftheanterior and posterior commissures. Cancers of the supraglottic or subglottic areas have a high tendency to involve adjacent organs, such as the hypopharynx by infiltration and the cervical lymph nodes by lymphatic spread. The descriptive epidemiology of laryngeal cancer is complicated by the difficulty in clinically distinguishing between tumors of the supraglottis or epilarynx and those of the hypopharynx, since the larynx has a complexanatomythatiscloselyrelatedtothe hypopharynx,andalsobytheinternational variationintheproportionsofcancersofthe glottisorendolarynx(includingvocalcords) amongalllaryngealcancers.4Mostfailuresin
thetreatmentoflaryngealcanceraredueto thedifficultyineradicatingthelocoregional disease,andalargenumberofsuchlaryngeal cancerpatientsdiefromthedisease.5
Incidencepatterns
Worldwideestimatesfor2005predictmore than160,000newcasesoflaryngealcancerin malesand22,000casesamongfemales.6These
predictionsonlyaccountfor1.7%ofallnew cancercasesaroundtheworld.Themale/female
The city of São Paulo exhibits one of the highest incidences of laryngeal cancer in worldandBrazilpresentsremarkableoccur-rence,comparedwithotherLatinAmerican countries. Around 8,000 new cases and 3,000deathsbylaryngealcanceroccuran-nuallyintheBrazilianpopulation.Inthecity ofSãoPaulo,incidenceratesforlaryngeal canceramongmaleshavebeendecreasing sincethelate1980swhile,amongfemales, the rates have shown a stable trend. This phenomenon is probably the expression of changes in gender behavior related to tobacco smoking. Several risk factors are involvedinthegenesisoflaryngealcancer. Themostimportantaretobaccosmokingand alcoholintake,butoccupationalhazardshave alsobeenassociatedwiththedisease,suchas asbestos,stronginorganicacids,cementdust andfreecrystallinesilica.Additionally,salted meatandtotalfatintakehavebeenlinkedto elevatedriskoflaryngealcancer.Conversely, severalstudieshaveconfirmedthatfruits,raw leafvegetablesandlegumesprotectagainst thiscancer.Someresearchershavepostulated a possible association between laryngeal squamouscellcarcinomaandhumanpapil-loma virus (HPV), but this is not universally accepted. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is weakly, but consistently correlated with laryngeal cancer. Familial cancer clusters, particularlyofheadandnecktumors,seem toincreasetheriskoflaryngealcancer.Some geneticpolymorphisms,suchasofgenesthat code for xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, haveshownelevatedriskforlaryngealcancer accordingtorecentstudies.Publichealthpoli-ciesregardingthecontroloftobaccosmoking and alcohol consumption, and also surveil-lanceofcarcinogenexposureinoccupational settings,couldhaveanimpactonlaryngeal cancer.Noproposalsforscreeninghavebeen recommendedforlaryngealcancer,butone diagnosticgoalshouldbetoavoidtreatment delaywhensuspectedsymptomshavebeen observed.
ratio(almost7:1)ishigherthanforcanceratany othersite,thusemphasizingtherarityoflaryn-gealcanceramongfemales.7Thisinternational
male/femaleratiofortheincidenceoflaryngeal cancerhasbeenbasedparticularlyondatafrom developedcountries.Asimilarmale/femaleratio (almost6:1)wasobservedamongcasesinthe case-controlstudyconductedintheMetropoli-tanRegionofSãoPaulofrom1999to2001.3
Amongmen,thehighestincidencerate during the early 1990s was reported from Zaragoza, Spain (17.1 cases per 100,000 malesperyear).Theareaswithhighincidence formen(>10/100,000peryear)areFrance, northern Italy, Spain and Portugal, various areasofcentralEurope,southernBrazil,Uru-guayandwesternAsia(Table1).8-11Inwestern
Asia,laryngealcanceraccountsformorethan 6%ofallcancersamongmen.Areaswithlow incidenceincludemostregionsofAfricaand easternAsiaforwhichcancerincidencedatais available,AndeancountriesinSouthAmerica andareasofCentralAmerica,Australiaand New Zealand, Canada except Quebec and severalbutnotallcountriesofnorthernEu-rope.Thelowestratehasbeenreportedfrom Qidong,China(0.7per100,000peryear).In Brazil,thecityofGoiâniashowedanadjusted rate of 6.4 cases per 100,000 males for the periodfrom1995to199812andSãoPaulo
14.9per100,000malesin1998.10
Table 2 shows the incidence rates for laryngealcanceramongmales,frompopula-tion-basedcancerregistersinBraziliancities.It isdifficulttorecognizeanypatternaccording totheregionsofthecountryfromthesedata. Butitcanbestatedthat,inthemajorityof thesecities,themaleincidenceisgreaterthan 5.0per100,000.13
Amongwomen,blacksfromtheUnited States have the highest reported incidence. For example, black women in Detroit show anadjustedstandardizedrateof2.9/100,000. Otherfemalepopulationswithhighincidence include:whitesfromtheUnitedStatesandin areasofSouthAmerica,AsiaandEurope.The low rates found among women from Spain andFranceareremarkable.12InBrazil,therates
amongfemalesinGoiâniaandSãoPaulowere, respectively,1.5and1.8per100,000.10,12
Mortalitypatterns
TheInternationalAgencyforResearchon Cancer(IARC)hasestimatedthattherewill bearound89,000deathsduetothiscancer among males and 12,000 among females worldwide in 2005.6 Mortality from this
cancerisparticularityhighamongmalesfrom eastern and southern Europe (rates around
6.5 to 7.5 per 100,000). At a second level, SouthAmerica(southernBrazil,Uruguayand Argentina)showsthehighestmortalityrates. Mortalityduetothiscancerisveryrareamong women,accountingforonly0.4%ofalldeaths duetocanceraroundtheworld.14InBrazil,
thehighestmortalityratesformales(6.2per 100,000)andfemales(0.6per100,000)have beenregisteredinSãoPaulo.Thelowestrates havebeendetectedinthestateofMaranhão formales(0.5per100,000)andinthestates ofAcreandAmapáforfemales(lessthan0.01 per100,000).2
Incidenceandmortalitytimetrends
Thetimetrendsforlaryngealcancerin-cidenceandmortalityareconsistentwiththe trendsforothercancersassociatedwithtobacco andalcohol.Increasingtrendsareseenincen-tralandeasternEuropeandinmostdeveloping countries,whileinNorthAmericaandwestern Europetheincidenceandmortalityhaveeither leveledofforaredecreasing(Colemanetal. 1993).4 But among females, increasing
inci-dencehasbeenreportedfromCanada,Italy,
Denmark,UnitedStatesandAustralia.15
InLatinAmericacountries,differentin-cidencetrendpatternsaresuggestedforCuba (steady increase), Puerto Rico (stable) and Cali,Colombia(decreasing).4Figure1shows
theincidenceratetrendsforlaryngealcancer inthecityofSãoPaulo.Thesehavedeclined formalessincethelate1980s,buthavebeen stableforfemales.10,16
The mortality trends in Latin America haveshownasteadyincreaseforCostaRica, asmallincreaseforUruguayandadecreasein youngbirthcohortsforChileandVenezuela.4
InBrazil,themortalityratesamongmaleswent from2.5per100,000individualsin1979to 3.0per100,000in1999.Amongfemales,the mortalityrate(around0.4per100,000)was stableoverthatsameperiod.2InSãoPaulo,the
mortalityrateswerestablefrom1969to1998 forbothmenandwomen,withratesranging fromlessthan1.0per100,000forfemalesto 6.0to8.0per100,000formales.10
Survivalpatterns
Eventhoughlargepercentagesofpatients
Table1.Laryngealcancerincidenceamongmales.Selectedcountries (wholeterritoryorspecificplaces),circa1990-19958-11
Annualage-adjustedrate(worldstandardpopulation)per100,000
<5 5-10 >10
Cali,Colombia Bombay,India Ahmedabad,India CostaRica Canada VasCounty,Hungary Gambia Goiânia,Brazil Cuba
Osaka,Japan HongKong,China Isère,France Quito,Ecuador Manila,Philippines SãoPaulo,Brazil
Setif,Algeria PuertoRico Turin,Italy QidongCity,China Saarland,Germany USA(amongblacks) Sweden St.Petersburg,Russia VilaNovadeGaia,Portugal Trujillo,Peru UnitedKingdom WarsawCity,Poland WesternAustralia USA(amongwhites) Zaragoza,Spain
Table2.Laryngealcancerincidenceamongmales. SelectedBraziliancities,circa1995-20001
Annualage-adjustedrate(worldstandardpopulation)per100,000
<5 5-10 >10
Belém,PA Campinas,SP BeloHorizonte,MG Palmas,TO Goiânia,GO Cuiabá,MG
JoãoPessoa,PB FederalDistrict Natal,RN Fortaleza,CE Recife,PE Manaus,AM Salvador,BA PortoAlegre,RS Vitória,ES SãoPaulo,SP
diefromthedisease,laryngealcarcinomaisa highlycurabledisease.Inthelate1960s,there wasasignificantimprovementinthefive-year survivalofpatientswithlaryngealneoplasms, mostly as a result of improvements in the prognosis of patients with regional disease. Accordingtodatafromdevelopedcountries, theprognosisforallpatientswithlaryngeal cancerhasremainedunchangedsincethemid-1970s,witharelativesurvivalrateof60-65% afterfiveyears,forallstagesandallformsof treatment.5Butinfact,overallimprovement
intheprognosiswasseeninEuropefrom1978 to1989,wherethefive-yearsurvivalincreased from 58% to 63%.17-19 Advancing age,
re-gionalandmetastaticdisease(advancedstages ofthediagnosedtumor)andalsosupraglottic cancershavebeenassociatedwithsignificantly reducedsurvival.5,20,21
Glottic tumors have a more favorable prognosisthanforsupraglotticandsubglot-tic tumors, which show poor survival that is similar to the rate seen for cancer of the pharynx.22,23Cancers of the hypopharynx
maybeattributedtothelarynxonthedeath certificate,andthusnotonlythesurvivaldata but also the mortality data from laryngeal canceraredifficulttointerpret.4
Tworeasonsareindicatedforthehigher rateofcontrolforglottistumors.First,since cancersofthetruevocalcordsproduceper-sistentandearlychangeinvoicequality,this symptom improves early diagnosis. Second, vocalcordcarcinomastendtobemetastati-callyinefficient,sincethevocalcordisvery poor in vessels (both lymphatic and blood vessels) for stimulating the angiogenic cas-cade,thusresultinginalowrateofmetastatic spread, occurring in less than 6% of such cases.21Considering the minimal superficial
natureoftumorsthatarelimitedtotheglottis, someauthorshaverecommendedthatthese tumorsbetreatedascarcinomainsituandnot asinvasivecarcinoma.24
Robbins25 conducted a study of
dis-ease-free survival among males and females with laryngeal cancer and did not find any significantsurvivaldifferencesbetweenmen andwomenwithregardtolocalandregional tumorcontrol.
Survivalratesarelowerindevelopingcoun-triesthanindevelopedcountries.Inastudyin India,thefive-yearrelativesurvivalrateswere 58.3% for glottic laryngeal cancer cases and 31.4%forsupraglotticlaryngealtumorcases. The five-year observed survival was 53.1% forthosewithlocalizedcancerand17.8%for patientswithregionalextension.26
Liu et al.27 studied fifty-nine laryngeal
orhypopharyngealsquamouscelltumorsin patientswhounderwentsurgeryandfound, in a multivariate analysis, that lymph node metastasiswastheonlystatisticallysignificant factorassociatedwithpoorprognosis.They alsofoundthatexpressionofproliferatingcell nuclearantigen(PCNA),aDNApolymerase accessoryprotein,andKi67,alargemolecular weightproteinwhoseexpressionisrestricted totheG1throughMphasesofthecellcycle andwhosefunctionremainsunknown,were positivelyassociatedwithpoorlydifferentiated laryngealcarcinomaandlaryngealcarcinoma thatwasassociatedwithlymphnodemetas-tasis. However, these results do not match those obtained in other studies for these biomarkers.28-30
Screeningandcasesearches
Screeningisnotrecommendedforlarynge-altumors,sincenowholepopulationscreening programforlaryngealcancerhasbeenevalu-ated.31,32Eventhoughpreclinicalcasesearches
cannotberecommended,onegoalshouldbeto avoidmedicaldiagnosticdelaywhensuspected symptomshavebeennoted.
Thereisahighincidenceofsecondpri-marycancersamongpatientswithlaryngeal tumors, particularly other head and neck,
esophageal or bronchial tumors. However, screeningemployedafterthefirsttreatment hasbeenunsuccessfulinyieldingsignificant reduction in mortality from such second primarytumors.15
Riskfactors
Squamouscellcarcinomaofthelarynxis amultifactorialdiseaseinfluencedbyenviron- mentalandlifestyle-relatedfactors.Heavyto-baccosmoking,excessivealcoholconsumption andexposuretochemicalinfluencescaused bysomeoccupationalhazardsareknownto beinvolvedasetiologicalfactorsinlaryngeal tumors.Inaddition,loweducationallevels, papillomavirusinfectionandgastroesopha-gealrefluxhavebeensuggestedascofactorsfor thiscancer,accordingtosomeepidemiological studies.Ontheotherhand,adietrichinfruits andvegetablesseemstohaveaprotectiveeffect againstlaryngealcancer.Inheritedpolymor- phismsofgenesthatcodeforcarcinogen-me-tabolizingenzymes,andalsogenesresponsible forcellcyclecontrolandDNArepairsystems, mayincreasetheriskoflaryngealcancer,even thoughacausalmechanismhasnotyetbeen thoroughlydemonstrated.5
Tobaccoandalcohol
Mortality trend studies on laryngeal cancers performed in France, Britain and Australia in the 1970s suggested that these tumorswererelatedtopatternsoftobaccoand alcoholconsumptionindifferentgenerations ofmales.33,34Ecologicalstudieslinkingtherisk
of laryngeal cancer in different populations tothepercapitaconsumptionoftobaccoand alcoholhavegenerallyshownacloserassocia-tionwiththelatterfactor.35
Chronic consumption of tobacco and alcohol independently increases the relative risk of laryngeal cancer in a dose-dependent fashion.Therelativeriskisgenerallyfarhigher forsmokingthanforalcoholconsumption.In acase-controlstudy,Wynderetal.36estimated
anoddsratiofortobaccoconsumptioninrela-tiontolaryngealtumorsof13.2.Theseauthors notedthatthecombinedeffectoftobaccoand alcohol seemed to be multiplicative, as con-firmedinareanalysisofthosedatabyFlanders &Rothman.37
Insubsequentcase-controlstud-ies,38,39similarconclusionswerereached.
In most studies, the risk of laryngeal canceramongalcoholicshasbeenfoundtobe twiceashighasamongthosenotdependent onalcohol.35Severalstudieshaveconfirmeda
dose-responserelationship,inwhichtherisk oflaryngealcancerincreasedwithincreasing dailyconsumptionofalcohol.40-43
Acase-controlstudyonlaryngealcancer inSãoPaulofoundanadjustedoddsratioof 7.5forheavysmokersand3.7forheavydrink-ers.3Inanotherstudyconductedinsouthern
Brazil from 1986 to 1989, no interaction betweentobaccosmokingandalcoholcon-sumptionwasobservedintheriskoflaryngeal cancer,44clearlynegatingtheinteractionfound
inotherstudies.37,39
Occupation
Loweducationallevelsandsomeoccupa-tionsareassociatedwithhighriskoflaryngeal cancer.Alargeproportionofpatientswithla-ryngealcancerareblue-collarworkersexposed toavarietyofchemicalhazardslikepolycyclic aromatic compounds, cement dust, metal dust,asbestos,varnishandlacquer.45-47
Since the 1970s, exposure to asbestos hasbeentreatedasariskfactorforlaryngeal cancer.48,49Inacase-controlstudy,Shettigara
andMorgan50foundthatasbestoswasmore
stronglyassociatedwiththediseasethanwere smokingandalcohol.Sincethen,otherstudies havenotedincreasedlaryngealcanceramong asbestos-exposedworkers.51-54
In1992,basedonresultsfromseveralstud-ies,IARCconcludedthattherewassufficient evidence to classify sulfuric acid and other stronginorganicacidmistsashumancarcino-gens,includingtheriskofdevelopinglaryngeal, lungandnasalsinuscancers.55Thiselevated
riskoflaryngealcancerwasconfirmedlaterin acohortstudyintheUnitedStatesamongsteel industryworkersexposedtoacidmists.56
Studies have shown that construction workersdisplayhigherrisksofacquiringlaryn-gealcancer.45,47Apopulation-basedcase-control
studyperformedinGermanyhasconfirmed thatexposuretocementdustisanindependent riskfactorforlaryngealcancer.57
Occupations related to working with wood have been found to affect the risk of laryngeal cancer independently of smoking statusinacase-controlstudyfromtheUnited States.36 Workers in wood-related
occupa-tions(wood-workersandfurnitureworkers) exposedforover20yearsshowedelevatedrisk inacase-controlstudyconductedinMadrid.58
A multicenter European case-control study found an elevated risk of laryngeal cancer (odds ratio 1.8; 95% confidence interval 1.3–2.7) for males aged 55 years who were exposedtowooddust.54
However,otherstud-iesthathaveexploredsuchanassociationhave eitherindicatedthatthereisnoriskorthat theestimatedriskislow.59
In an IARC monograph on the rubber industry,60norelationshipbetweenworking
in that industry and laryngeal cancer was identified.However,acohortstudyconducted in São Paulo among rubber industry work-ersidentifiedfourcasesoflaryngealcancer. Thesecasesaccountedfor6.0%ofallcancers identifiedinthestudy:threetimeshigherthan expected.61 Asbestos, vulcanization fumes
and, particularly, nitrosamines have been consideredasthepossiblecausativeagentsof cancerintherubberindustry,inadditionto naphthylamine.60
A case-control study from the United Statesfoundriskfactorsofmorethan3.0for railroadindustryworkers,sheetmetalwork-ers,grindingwheeloperatorsandautomobile mechanics.62DeStefanietal.,53
inacase-con-trolstudyconductedinUruguay,foundan elevatedriskoflaryngealcanceramongbutch-ers, vintnelevatedriskoflaryngealcanceramongbutch-ers, bakers and car assemblers. In addition,theyfoundthatasbestos,mistsfrom stronginorganicacidsandpesticideexposure wereassociatedwithincreasedriskoflaryngeal cancer.Acase-controlstudyperformedinSão Paulo3
foundelevatedriskamongworkersex-posedtorespirablefreecrystallinesilica,soot, fumesingeneral,andliveanimals.
Nutritionanddiet
Case-controlstudiesconductedinUru-guay63-65haveindicatedthatdietarypatterns
with high consumption of salted meat and hightotalfatintakeareassociatedwithlaryn-gealcancer.Totalfatintakecombinesitseffect multiplicatively with tobacco smoking. On theotherhand,intakeofplantfoods,fruits, rawleafvegetablesandlegumesareassociated withprotectionagainstlaryngealcancer.Case-controlstudiesconductedinEuropehavealso confirmed these relational patterns between nutritionandlaryngealcancer.66-68
Viruses
Studieshavepostulatedanassociationbe-tweenlaryngealsquamouscellcarcinomaand humanpapillomavirus(HPV),types16,18and 33.69Onecase-controlstudyidentifiedincreased
odds ratios for exposure to oncogenic HPV typesandlaryngealcancer,aswellaslaryngeal leukoplakia,butthedatawerenotstatistically significantaftercontrollingfortobaccosmoking andalcoholconsumption.70HPVpositivityis
muchmorecommoninoropharyngealcancers andithasbeenpostulatedthatHPVplaysa roleinafractionofcancersoftheoralcavity andpharynx.71However,ananalogousrolefor
HPVinlarynxcancerislessclear.
TherelationshipbetweenHPVinfection and laryngeal cancer is taken for granted, since recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
is caused by proliferative growth induced byHPV6and11infectioninthelaryngeal epithelium.71 In a pilot study on a series
involving50laryngealcancercasesforming partofamulticentercase-controlstudy(São Paulo,RiodeJaneiro,Goiânia,PortoAlegre, Pelotas and Buenos Aires), the presence of HPV-DNAdetectedthroughthepolymerase chainreaction(PCR)wasidentifiedonlyin onecase(unpublisheddata).
Gastroesophagealrefluxdisease
Overrecentyears,gastroesophagealreflux as an independent carcinogenic factor and co-carcinogen in association with smoking and alcohol consumption has stirred great interest.TwocaseseriesinFranceandItaly72,73
haveconfirmedthatgastroesophagealrefluxis oftenpresentinpatientswithsquamouscell carcinoma of the pharynx and larynx. One case-controlstudyhasidentifiedasmallbut significant elevation of the risk of laryngeal canceraftercontrollingforage,sex,tobacco smokingandalcoholconsumption.74Weaver75
performedasystematicreviewofstudiesthat exploredassociationsbetweengastroesopha-geal reflux and sinusitis, otitis media and laryngealmalignancy.Basedontheanalysis of18articles,hefoundweaksupportfora positiveassociationbetweengastroesophageal refluxdiseaseandlaryngealmalignancy.How-ever,themechanismforcarcinogenicactionis notyetclearlyunderstood.
Familialclustersandgeneticsusceptibility
Genetic susceptibility to environmental riskfactorsandcarcinogensisbyandlargerec-ognized.Inacase-controlstudyconductedin Brazil,anelevatedriskofdevelopingsquamous cellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckwasde-tectedinindividualswithafirst-degreerelative whohadhadsometypeofcancer,buttherisk washigher(oddsratio3.65;95%confidence interval 1.97–6.76) if the relative had had headorneckcancer.76Basedontheseresults
only,itisdifficulttosetaparttheinfluenceof heredityversussharedenvironmentalfactors. Familialcanceraggregationmaybeexplained bybothgeneticpredispositionandbythefact thatthemembersofafamilytendtosharethe samehabits,suchastobaccosmoking,alcohol drinking,dietandoccupation.77
(CYP)andglutathione-S-transferase(GST), whicharetheonesmostfrequentlystudied, while glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) and alcoholdehydrogenase(ADH)havealsobeen examined.Polymorphismsofgenesinvolved inDNArepairsystemshavealsobeenstud-ied.78
Somestudiesoncarcinogen-metaboliz-ingenzymeshavefoundanelevatedriskof laryngeal cancer for some polymorphisms, suchasinthosewiththeenzymegenotypes GSTT1-null,79 combined GSTM3 (AB or
BB) and GSTM1-null,80 CYP1A1 (MspI
MHorNcoIHT)81andUGT1A10codon
139polymorphism.82However,otherstudies
havenotfoundrisksoflaryngealcancerfor geneticpolymorphismsinADH1B,ADH1C, GSTM1andGSTT1afteradjustingforto-bacco smoking and alcohol consumption,83
orfoundariskonlywhentheGSTM1and GSTT1nullgenotypeswerejointlypresent, butnotforCYP1A1andCYP2D6.84
Muchmorestudywillcertainlybeneeded fortheroleofgeneticpolymorphismslinked
to carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes to be clearly understood.There is a promising futureforepidemiologicalstudiesongenetic polymorphisms,notonlyforlaryngealcancer, but also for cancer in general, lying in the explorationoftheinteractionbetweengenetic polymorphismsandenvironmentalfactors.
CONCLUSIONS
Itremainsclearthat,evenwiththenew evidenceonawiderangeofriskfactorsfor laryngeal cancer, primary prevention for the majority of these tumors must be ad-dressedthroughcontroloftobaccosmoking andreductionintheconsumptionofalco-holic beverages. Patients without a history oftobaccosmokinganduseofalcoholwho develop laryngeal cancer showed different characteristics from those of smokers or drinkers. Such individuals are on average 10yearsolder,shownomalepredominance andtheirlesionsaremainlylocatedinthe
glottis,whichallowsforearlydiagnosisand consequentlyhighersurvivalrates.85
Laryngeal cancer incidence rates in the cityofSãoPaulo,forthelongestperiodthat canbeobtainedforcancerincidenceratesin Brazil(1969-1998),havedeclinedsincethe late1980samongmales,buthavebeenstable amongfemales(Figure1).Thisfactprobably reflectslifestylechangesamongwomen.The stabletrendtowardslaryngealcancerdetected amongwomencouldworseninthenearfu-ture,giventhevariousindicationsthatwomen inyoungeragegroupsshowhighertobacco smokingprevalencethanformeninthesame agegroups.86-89
Nonetheless,independentofthesetrends, thehighlaryngealcancerincidencepatterns in Brazil, particularly in the southeastern and southern regions, require public health policies for the control of tobacco smoking and reduction of alcohol consumption, as wellasreductionsincarcinogenexposurein occupationalsettings.
1. INCA.InstitutoNacionaldeCâncer.Estimativasdeincidência emortalidadeporcâncernoBrasil,2003.AvailablefromURL: http://www.inca.gov.br/estimativas/2003. Accessed in 2004 (Aug4).
2. INCA.InstitutoNacionaldoCâncer.Atlasdemortalidadepor câncernoBrasil1979-1999.RiodeJaneiro:INCA,2002. 3. SartorSG.Riscosocupacionaisparacâncerdelaringe:umestudo
caso-controle.[thesis].SãoPaulo:FaculdadedeMedicinada UniversidadedeSãoPaulo;2003.
4. Coleman MP, Estève J, Damiecki P, Arslan A, Renard H. Trends in cancer incidence and mortality. IARC Sci Publ. 1993;(121):1-806.
5. Austin DF, Reynolds P. Laryngeal Cancer. In: Schottenfeld D,SearleJG,FraumeniJF,editors.CancerEpidemiologyand Prevention.2ndEdition.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress;
1997.p.619-36.
6. FerlayJ,BrayF,PisaniP,ParkinDM.Globocan2000:cancer incidence,mortalityandprevalenceworldwide.Version1.Can-cerbaseNo.5.Lyon:IARCPress;2001.AvailablefromURL: http://www-dep.iarc.fr/globocan/globocan.html. Accessed in 2004(Aug4).
7. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer. 1999;80(6):827-41.
8. ParkinDM,MuirCS,WhelanSL,GaoY-T,FerlayJ,PowellJ. Cancerincidenceinfivecontinents.Vol.VI.Lyon:IARC,1992. (IARCScientificPublicationsNo.120).
9. ParkinDM,WhelanSL,FerlayJ,RaymondL,YoungJ.Cancer incidenceinfivecontinents.Vol.VII.Lyon:IARC,1997.(IARC ScientificPublicationsNo.143).
10. Mirra AP, Latorre MRDO, Veneziano DB. Incidência de
CâncernoMunicípiodeSãoPaulo,Brasil:tendêncianoperíodo 1969-1999.[CancerincidenceinthecityofSãoPaulo,Brazil, 1997-1998.CancermortalityinthecityofSãoPaulo,Brazil. Trendintheperiod1969-1998].Brasília,DF:Ministérioda Saúde; 2001. Available from URL: http://www.google.com. br/search?q=cache:W6Bmhf9fAC8J:www.fsp.usp.br/rcsp/rcsp1. pdf+Cancer+incidence+in+the+city+of+S%C3%A3o+Paulo, +Brazil,+1997-1998+and+cancer+mortality+in+the+city+of +S%C3%A3o+Paulo,+Brazil,+trend+in+the+period+1969-1998.&hl=pt-BR.Accessedin2004(Aug4).
11. PinheiroPS,TyczynskiJE,BrayF,AmadoJ,MatosE,Parkin DM.CancerincidenceandmortalityinPortugal.EurJCancer 2003;39(17):2507-20.
12. ParkinDM,WhelanSL,FerlayJ,TeppoL,ThomasDB.Cancer incidence in five continents. Vol. VIII. Lyon: IARC, 2002. (IARCScientificPublicationsNo.155).
13. INCA.InstitutoNacionaldeCâncer.CâncernoBrasil:dados dosregistrosdebasepopulacional.RiodeJaneiro:INCA,2003. Available from URL: http://www.inca.gov.br/regpop/2003/. Accessedin2004(Aug4).
14. Pisani P, Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwidemortalityfrom25cancersin1990.IntJCancer. 1999;83(1):18-29.
15. LicitraL,BernierJ,GrandiC,etal.Cancerofthelarynx.Crit RevOncolHematol.2003;47(1):65-80.
16. MirraAP,FrancoEL.CancerincidenceinSãoPauloCounty, Brazil.SãoPaulo:SãoPauloCancerRegistry/LudwigInstitute forCancerResearch(SãoPauloBranch);1985.
17. BerrinoF,SantM,VerdecchiaA,CapocacciaR,HakulinenT,Esteve J.SurvivalofcancerpatientsinEurope.TheEUROCAREStudy. Lyon:IARC;1995.(IARCScientificPublicationsNo.132).
18. BerrinoF,GattaG.Variationinsurvivalofpatientswithhead andneckcancerinEuropebythesiteoforiginofthetumours. EUROCAREWorkingGroup.EurJCancer.1998;34(14Spec No):2154-61.
19. BerrinoF,CapocacciaR,EsteveJ.Survivalofcancerpatients inEurope.TheEUROCARE-IIStudy.).Lyon:IARC;1999. (IARCScientificPublicationsNo.151).
20. PiccirilloJF,WellsCK,SasakiCT,FeinsteinAR.Newclinical severitystagingsystemforcancerofthelarynx.Five-yearsurvival rates.AnnOtolRhinolLaryngol.1994;103(2):83-92. 21. SasakiCT,JassinB.Cancerofthepharynxandlarynx.AmJ
Med.2001;111(Suppl8A):118S-123S.
22. Pera E, Moreno A, Galindo L. Prognostic factors in laryn-geal carcinoma. A multifactorial study of 416 cases. Cancer. 1986;58(4):928-34.
23. StellPM.Prognosisinlaryngealcarcinoma:hostfactors.Clin Otolaryngol.1990;15(2):111-9.
24. HeffnerDK.Infinitesimals,quantummechanics,andexiguous carcinomas:howtopossiblysaveapatient’slarynx.AnnDiagn Pathol.2003;7(3):187-94.
25. RobbinsKT.Prognosticandtherapeuticimplicationsofgender and menopausal status in laryngeal cancer. J Otolaryngol. 1988;17(2):81-5.
26. Sankaranarayanan R, Ramanakumar AV, Yeole BB. Survival fromglotticandsupraglotticlaryngealcarcinomainMumbai (Bombay),India.OralOncol.2003;39(7):656-63. 27. Liu M, Lawson G, Delos M, et al. Prognostic value of cell
proliferation markers, tumour suppressor proteins and cell adhesion molecules in primary squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;260(1):28-34.
28. TomasinoRM,DanieleE,BazanV,etal.Prognosticsignificance ofcellkineticsinlaryngealsquamouscellcarcinoma:clinico-pathologicalassociations.CancerRes.1995;55(24):6103-8. 29. TakesRP,BaatenburgdeJongRJ,SchuuringE,etal.Markers
forassessmentofnodalmetastasisinlaryngealcarcinoma.Arch OtolaryngolHeadNeckSurg.1997;123(4):412-9. 30. GrzankaA,SujkowskaR,JaniakA,AdamskaM.Immunogold
labellingofPCNAandKi-67antigenattheultrastructurallevel inlaryngealsquamouscellcarcinomaanditscorrelationwith lymphnodemetastasisandhistologicalgrade.ActaHistochem. 2000;102(2):139-49.
31. The periodic health examination. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121(9):1193-254.
32. USPreventiveServicesTaskForce.Guidetoclinicalpreventive services.2ndedition.Baltimore:LippincottWilliams&Wilkins;
1996.
33. TuynsAJ,AudigierJC.Doublewavecohortincreaseforoe-sophagealandlaryngealcancerinFranceinrelationtoreduced alcoholconsumptionduringthesecondworldwar.Digestion. 1976;14(3):197-208.
34. McMichael AJ. Increases in laryngeal cancer in Britain and Australiainrelationtoalcoholandtobaccoconsumptiontrends. Lancet.1978;1(8076):1244-7.
35.Tomatis L. Cancer: Causes, occurrence and control. Lyon: IARC;1990.
36. WynderEL,CoveyLS,MabuchiK,MushinskiM.Environ-mentalfactorsincancerofthelarynx:asecondlook.Cancer. 1976;38(4):1591-601.
37. FlandersWD,RothmanKJ.Interactionofalcoholandtobacco inlaryngealcancer.AmJEpidemiol.1982;115(3):371-9. 38. ElwoodJM,PearsonJC,SkippenDH,JacksonSM.Alcohol,
smoking, social and occupational factors in the aetiology of cancer of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx. Int J Cancer. 1984;34(5):603-12.
39. TalaminiR,BosettiC,LaVecchiaC,etal.Combinedeffect oftobaccoandalcoholonlaryngealcancerrisk:acase-control study.CancerCausesControl.2002;13(10):957-64. 40. MuscatJE,WynderEL.Tobacco,alcohol,asbestos,andoccupational
riskfactorsforlaryngealcancer.Cancer.1992;69(9):2244-51. 41. Tavani A, Negri E, Franceschi S, Barbone F, La Vecchia C.
AttributableriskforlaryngealcancerinnorthernItaly.Cancer EpidemiolBiomarkersPrev.1994;3(2):121-5.
42. Kjaerheim K, Gaard M, Andersen A.The role of alcohol, tobacco,anddietaryfactorsinupperaerogastrictractcancers: aprospectivestudyof10,900Norwegianmen.CancerCauses Control1998;9(1):99-108.
43. GallusS,BosettiC,FranceschiS,LeviF,NegriE,LaVecchia C.Laryngealcancerinwomen:tobacco,alcohol,nutritional, and hormonal factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12(6):514-7.
44. SchlechtNF,FrancoEL,PintosJ,etal.Interactionbetween tobacco and alcohol consumption and the risk of cancers of the upper aero-digestive tract in Brazil. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(11):1129-37.
45. ElciOC,DosemeciM,BlairA.Occupationandtheriskof laryngeal cancer inTurkey. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001;27(4):233-9.
46. Elci OC, Akpinar-Elci M, Blair A, Dosemeci M. Risk of laryngealcancerbyoccupationalchemicalexposureinTurkey. JOccupEnvironMed.2003;45(10):1100-6.
47. BoffettaP,RichiardiL,BerrinoF,etal.Occupationandlarynx andhypopharynxcancer:aninternationalcase-controlstudyin France,Italy,SpainandSwitzerland.CancerCausesControl. 2003;14(3):203-12.
48. StellPM,McGillT.Asbestosandlaryngealcarcinoma.Lancet. 1973;2(7826):416-7.
49. Newhouse ML, Berry G. Abestos and laryngeal carcinoma. Lancet.1973;2(7829):615.
50. ShettigaraPT,MorganRW.Asbestos,smoking,andlaryngeal carcinoma.ArchEnvironHealth.1975;30(10):517-9. 51. BurchJD,HoweGR,MillerAB,SemenciwR.Tobacco,alcohol,
asbestos,andnickelintheetiologyofcancerofthelarynx:a case-controlstudy.JNatlCancerInst.1981;67(6):1219-24. 52. Gustavsson P, Jakobsson R, Johansson H, Lewin F, Norell
S, Rutkvist LE. Occupational exposures and squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and oesopha-gus: a case-control study in Sweden. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55(6):393-400.
53. DeStefaniE,BoffettaP,OreggiaF,RoncoA,KogevinasM, MendilaharsuM.Occupationandtheriskoflaryngealcancer inUruguay.AmJIndMed.1998;33(6):537-42. 54. BerrinoF,RichiardiL,BoffettaP,etal.Occupationandlarynx
andhypopharynxcancer:ajob-exposurematrixapproachin aninternationalcase-controlstudyinFrance,Italy,Spainand Switzerland.CancerCausesControl.2003;14(3):213-23. 55. IARC. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC
Monographsontheevaluationofcarcinogenicrisktohumans. Occupational exposures to mists and vapours from strong inorganic acids; and other industrial chemicals. Lyon: IARC Press;1992.p.41-119.
56. Steenland K. Laryngeal cancer incidence among workers exposedtoacidmists(UnitedStates).CancerCausesControl. 1997;8(1):34-8.
57. DietzA,RamrothH,UrbanT,AhrensW,BecherH.Exposure tocementdust,relatedoccupationalgroupsandlaryngealcancer risk:resultsofapopulationbasedcase-controlstudy.IntJCancer 2004;108(6):907-11.
58. Pollán M, López-Abente G. Wood-related occupations and laryngealcancer.CancerDetectPrev.1995;19(3):250-7. 59. IARC. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC
Monographsontheevaluationofcarcinogenicrisktohumans. Wooddustandformaldehyde.Lyon:IARCPress;1995. 60. IARC. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC
Monographsontheevaluationofcarcinogenicriskofchemicals tohumans.Therubberindustry.Lyon:IARCPress;1982. 61. NevesH.Mortalidadeporcânceremumacoortedetrabalhadores
daindústriadaborrachadeSãoPaulo.[thesis]SãoPaulo:Facul-dadedeSaúdePúblicadaUniversidadedeSãoPaulo;2004. 62. Flanders WD, Rothman KJ. Occupational risk for laryngeal
cancer.AmJPublicHealth.1982;72(4):369-72. 63. DeStefaniE,OreggiaF,RiveroS,RoncoA,FierroL.Saltedmeat
consumptionandtheriskoflaryngealcancer.EurJEpidemiol 1995;11(2):177-80.
64. DeStefaniE,BoffettaP,OreggiaF,etal.Plantfoodsandriskof laryngealcancer:Acase-controlstudyinUruguay.IntJCancer. 2000;87(1):129-32.
65. OreggiaF,DeStefaniE,BoffettaP,BrennanP,Deneo-Pellegrini H,RoncoAL.Meat,fatandriskoflaryngealcancer:acase-controlstudyinUruguay.OralOncol.2001;37(2):141-5. 66. EstèveJ,RiboliE,PéquignotG,etal.Dietandcancersofthe
larynxandhypopharynx:theIARCmulti-centerstudyinsouth-westernEurope.CancerCausesControl.1996;7(2):240-52. 67. CrosignaniP,RussoA,TagliabueG,BerrinoF.Tobaccoanddiet
asdeterminantsofsurvivalinmalelaryngealcancerpatients.Int JCancer.1996;65(3):308-13.
68. BosettiC,LaVecchiaC,TalaminiR,etal.Foodgroupsand laryngealcancerrisk:acase-controlstudyfromItalyandSwit-zerland.IntJCancer.2002;100(3):355-60.
69. Sugár J,Vereczkey I,Tóth J. Some etio-pathogenetic factors in laryngeal carcinogenesis. J Environ PatholToxicol Oncol. 1996;15(2-4):195-9.
70. SmithEM,SummersgillKF,AllenJ,etal.Humanpapilloma-virusandriskoflaryngealcancer.AnnOtolRhinolLaryngol. 2000;109(11):1069-76.
71. Herrero R. Chapter 7: Human papillomavirus and cancer oftheupperaerodigestivetract.JNatlCancerInstMonogr. 2003;(31):47-51.
72. BiacabeB,GleichLL,LaccourreyeO,HartlDM,Bouchoucha M,BrasnuD.Silentgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinpatients with pharyngolaryngeal cancer: further results. Head Neck. 1998;20(6):510-4.
73. GalliJ,CammarotaG,CalòL,etal.Theroleofacidandalkaline reflux in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(10):1861-5.
74. El-SeragHB,HepworthEJ,LeeP,SonnenbergA.Gastroesopha-gealrefluxdiseaseisariskfactorforlaryngealandpharyngeal cancer.AmJGastroenterol.2001;96(7):2013-8. 75. Weaver EM. Association between gastroesophageal reflux and
sinusitis,otitismedia,andlaryngealmalignancy:asystematicreview oftheevidence.AmJMed.2003;115(Suppl3A):81S-89S. 76. FoulkesWD,BrunetJS,KowalskiLP,NarodSA,FrancoEL.
Familyhistoryofcancerisariskfactorforsquamouscellcarci-nomaoftheheadandneckinBrazil:acase-controlstudy.Int JCancer.1995;63(6):769-73.
77. Wünsch-Filho V, Boffetta P, Colin D, Moncau JE. Familial canceraggregationandtheriskoflungcancer.SãoPauloMed J.2002;120(2):38-44.
78. ElahiA,ZhengZ,ParkJ,EyringK,McCaffreyT,LazarusP. ThehumanOGG1DNArepairenzymeanditsassociationwith orolaryngealcancerrisk.Carcinogenesis.2002;23(7):1229-34. 79. Jahnke V, Matthias C, Fryer A, Strange R. Glutathione
S-transferase and cytochrome-P-450 polymorphism as risk factorsforsquamouscellcarcinomaofthelarynx.AmJSurg. 1996;172(6):671-3.
80. Jourenkova-MironovaN,VohoA,BouchardyC,etal.Glutathi-oneS-tranferaseGSTM3andGSTP1genotypesandlarynxcancer risk.CancerEpidemiolBiomarkersPrev.1999;8(2):185-8. 81. VarzimG,MonteiroE,SilvaRA,FernandesJ,LopesC.CYP1A1
andXRCC1genepolymorphismsinSCCofthelarynx.EurJ CancerPrev.2003;12(6):495-9.
82. ElahiA,BendalyJ,ZhengZ,etal.DetectionofUGT1A10 polymorphismsandtheirassociationwithorolaryngealcarci-nomarisk.Cancer.2003;98(4):872-80.
83. RischA,RamrothH,RaedtsV,etal.Laryngealcancerriskin Caucasiansisassociatedwithalcoholandtobaccoconsump-tion but not modified by genetic polymorphisms in class I alcoholdehydrogenasesADH1BandADH1C,andglutathi-one-S-transferases GSTM1 and GSTT1. Pharmacogenetics. 2003;13(4):225-30.
84. GronauS,Koenig-GregerD,JergM,RiechelmannH.Gene polymorphismsindetoxificationenzymesassusceptibilityfac-torforheadandneckcancer?OtolaryngolHeadNeckSurg. 2003;128(5):674-80.
85. AgudeloD,QuerM,LeónX,DíezS,BurguésJ.Laryngeal carcinomainpatientswithoutahistoryoftobaccoandalcohol use.HeadNeck.1997;19(3):200-4.
86. RegoRA,BerardoFA,RodriguesSS,etal.Fatoresderiscopara doenças crônicas não-transmissíveis: inquérito domiciliar no municípiodeSãoPaulo,SP(Brasil).Metodologiaeresultados preliminares. [Risk factors for chronic non-communicable diseases:adomiciliarysurveyinthemunicipalityofSãoPaulo, SP(Brazil).Methodologyandpreliminaryresults].RevSaúde Pública.1990;24(4):277-85.
87. JolyDJ.ElhábitodefumarcigarrillosenAmericaLatina.Una encuesta en ocho ciudades. [The cigarette smoking habit in LatinAmerica.Asurveyin8cities].BolOficinaSanitPanam. 1975;79(2):93-111.
88. DuncanBB,SchmidtMI,PolanczykCA,HomrichCS,Rosa RS,AchuttiAC.Fatoresderiscoparadoençasnão-transmissíveis emumaáreametropolitananaregiãosuldoBrasil.Prevalênciae simultaneidade.[Riskfactorsfornon-communicablediseasesin ametropolitanareainsouthofBrazil.Prevalenceandsimultane-ity].RevSaúdePública.1993;27(1):43-8.
Publishinginformation
VictorWünschFilho,MD,PhD. DepartmentofEpidemiol-ogy,FaculdadedeSaúdePública,UniversidadedeSão Paulo,SãoPaulo,Brazil.
Sourcesoffunding:Notdeclared
Conflictofinterest:Notdeclared
Dateoffirstsubmission:July15,2004
Lastreceived:August31,2004
Accepted:September2,2004
Addressforcorrespondence:
FaculdadedeSaúdePúblicadaUSP DepartamentodeEpidemiologia Av.DrArnaldo,715
SãoPaulo(SP)—Brasil—CEP01246-904 Tel.(+5511)3066-7764
E-mail:[email protected]
COPYRIGHT©2004,AssociaçãoPaulistadeMedicina
EpidemiologiadocâncerdelaringenoBrasil
AcidadedeSãoPauloapresentaumadas maisaltasincidênciasdecâncerdelaringe nomundoeoBrasilumaocorrênciaexpres-sivaquandocomparadacomoutrospaíses daAméricaLatina.Emtornode8.000casos novose3.000mortespeladoençaatingem anualmenteapopulaçãobrasileira.Naci-dadedeSãoPaulo,astaxasdeincidênciapor câncerdelaringemostram-sedecrescentes desdeofinaldadécadade1980,porém,en-treasmulheresastaxasrevelam-seestáveis. Estastendências,possivelmente,expressam asmudançasnocomportamentodehomens emulheresemrelaçãoaoconsumodecigar-ros.Váriosfatoresderiscosãorelacionados aocâncerdelaringe.Osmaisimportantes sãotabagismoeconsumobebidasalcoólicas, porém exposições a cancerígenos ocupa-cionais também são associadas à doença, como o amianto, os ácidos inorgânicos fortes,apoeiradecimentoeasílicacris-talinalivre.Oconsumodecarnesalgadae gorduras está relacionado com excesso de riscodecâncerdelaringe.Poroutrolado, váriosestudostêmconfirmadoquefrutas,
vegetais crus e legumes protegem contra estecâncer.Háreferênciasdapossívelas-sociaçãoentrecarcinomaespinocelularde laringeeopapilomavírushumano(HPV), mas este fato não está comprovado. O refluxo gastro-intestinal relaciona-se de forma tênue, porém consistente com o câncerdelaringe.Aglomeraçãodecâncer na família, particularmente de tumores de cabeça e pescoço, aumenta o risco de câncerdalaringe.Polimorfismosgenéticos, especialmentedegenesenvolvidosnaação deenzimasresponsáveispelametabolização decancerígenos,apresentamassociaçãocom ocâncerdelaringedeacordocomestudos recentes.Políticasdecontroledotabagismo econsumoexcessivodeálcool,bemcomo a vigilância de exposições a cancerígenos ocupacionais,terãobenéficasrepercussões nocâncerdelaringe.Nãohárecomendação paraorastreamentodecâncerdalaringe, todaviaumavezrealizadoodiagnósticoo tratamento médico imediato influenciará nasobrevidadopaciente.
PALAVRAS-CHAVE:Neoplasias laríngeas.
Epidemiologia. Incidência. Mortalidade. Fatoresderisco.