ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Fluid
Phase
Equilibria
jo u r n al h om ep a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / f l u i d
Viscosity
of
liquid
systems
involving
hydrogenated
and
fluorinated
substances:
Liquid
mixtures
of
(hexane
+
perfluorohexane)
Pedro
Morgado
a,
Jana
Black
b,
J.
Ben
Lewis
b,
Christopher
R.
Iacovella
b,
Clare
McCabe
b,c,
Luís
F.G.
Martins
d,
Eduardo
J.M.
Filipe
a,∗aCentrodeQuímicaEstrutural,InstitutoSuperiorTécnico,UniversidadeTécnicadeLisboa,1049-001Lisboa,Portugal bDepartmentofChemicalandBiomolecularEngineering,VanderbiltUniversity,Nashville,TN37235,USA
cDepartmentofChemistry,VanderbiltUniversity,Nashville,TN37235,USA
dCentrodeQuímicadeÉvora,UniversidadedeÉvora,RuaRomãoRamalho,59,7000-671Évora,Portugal
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received21June2013
Receivedinrevisedform26July2013 Accepted30July2013
Available online 19 August 2013 Keywords: Viscosity Mixtures Perfluoroalkanes Alkanes Moleculardynamics
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Theviscosityof(hexane+perfluorohexane)mixtureshasbeenmeasuredat298K,303Kand308K,over
thewholecompositionrange.Theresultsshowlargenegativedeviationsfromthearithmeticmeanofthe
viscositiesofthepurecomponents,reaching−17%atx(perfluorohexane)=0.7.Toobtainmolecularlevel
insightintothebehaviourofthesystem,all-atommoleculardynamicssimulationshavebeenperformed
andusedtocalculatetheviscosities,radialdistributionfunctions,androtationalrelaxationtimesof
thestudied(hexane+perfluorohexane)mixtures.Thisisthefirstefforttoassesstheeffectofmixing
hydrogenatedandfluorinatedmoleculesintheviscosity.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Itiswellknownthatalkane+perfluoroalkanemixturesdisplay
largedeviationsfromidealbehaviour(liquid–liquidimmiscibility,
largepositiveexcessvolumesandenthalpies,positivedeviationsto
Raoult’slaw,etc.).Inthecaseoftransportproperties,eventhough
theconceptofidealityisnotclearlydefined,atypicalbehaviour
couldalso be expected due to thealleged weak cross
interac-tionsbetweenhydrogenatedandperfluorinatedchains.However,
despiteitsobviousimportance,thesubjecthasnotbeenaddressed
intheliterature.Theonlymeasurementsofviscosityreportedfor
mixturesofalkanesandperfluoroalkanesarethoseofMcLureand
Clements[1],whofocusedonthediscontinuityinviscosityneara
liquid–liquidcriticaltemperature.Theauthorsmeasuredthe
vis-cosityof a single(hexane (H6)+perfluorohexane (F6))mixture,
atthecriticalcomposition(x(F6)=0.370),atseveraltemperatures
abovetheliquid–liquiduppercriticalsolutiontemperature(UCST).
BelowtheUCST,theviscosityofbothphasesinequilibriumwasalso
measuredatseveraltemperatures.
The knowledge of the viscosity behaviour of
alkane+perfluoroalkane mixtures is of special importance in
∗ Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+351218419261. E-mailaddress:efi[email protected](E.J.M.Filipe).
thefield ofbiphasicsynthesisand catalysisknownas“fluorous
chemistry”,sincethesolventsusedare(partiallymiscible)
mix-tures ofhydro-and fluorocarbons.Additionally, thisknowledge
is of great benefit to theinterpretation of perfluoroalkylalkane
(PFAA)viscosities,recentlymeasured[2]inourgroup.PFAAare
diblock compounds madeof alkyl and perfluoroalkyl segments
covalentlybondedtoformasinglechain.Theycanbepicturedas
chemicalmixturesoftwomutuallyphobicsegmentsthatinmost
caseswouldotherwisephaseseparate.
Structurally, thesubstitution of hydrogenfor the largerand
heavierfluorineatomresultsin alargercross-sectional areafor
perfluorinatedchains[3](0.283nm2 comparedto0.185nm2 for
n-alkanes) and also in higher densities and molar volumesfor
n-perfluoroalkanes,whencomparedton-alkanes withthesame
numberofcarbonatoms.Consequently,inamixtureofan-alkane
withthecorrespondingperfluoroalkane, thevolumefractionof
perfluoroalkaneisalwaysconsiderablyhigherthanitsmole
frac-tionandaprobeimmersedinsuchamixturewould“experience”a
muchmorefluorinatedenvironmentthanexpectedfromthemolar
composition. Anotherimportantdifference betweenfluorinated
andhydrogenatedchainsisconformational.Whilethen-alkanes
tendtobeinanall-transplanarform,n-perfluoroalkanesdisplay
ahelicalconformation[4];also,theflexible characterof
hydro-genatedchainscontrastswiththerigidityoftheirperfluorinated
counterparts.Itisbelievedthatoneoftheconsequencesofchain
0378-3812/$–seefrontmatter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2013.07.060
stiffnessinliquidfluorocarbonsisalessefficientmolecularpacking
andtheexistenceof“holes”intheliquid.Thiscanexplain(atleast
inpart)theenhancedsolubilityofsimplegases(oxygen,nitrogen,
etc.)inliquidperfluoroalkanes.Ontheotherhand,
perfluoroalka-nestendtobemorevolatilethanthecorrespondingn-alkanesdue
totheirweakercohesiveforces,showinghoweverhigher
viscos-ity,which canalsobeattributedto theknownrigidityoftheir
molecularstructure.
Considerable changes in volume occur when hydrogenated
chains are mixed with fluorinated chains. We have recently
reportedpartialmolarvolumesatinfinitedilutionforaseriesof
n-perfluoroalkanesinn-octane[5,6].Forexample,whenamolecule
ofF6isimmersedinn-octane,atinfinitedilution,itsmolarvolume
increasesfrom202.4cm3mol−1to229.3cm3mol−1,i.e.,13%.
Lit-erally,alayerofemptyspaceiscreatedaroundtheF6molecule.
Theeffectisevenmorepronouncedwhenn-alkanesaredissolved
inn-perfluoroalkanes:theirmolarvolumesincreaseby20%[7]!It
shouldbeemphasizedthattheseareinfinitedilutiondata,i.e.,no
packingeffectsareincludedthatathigherconcentrationswould
contributetotheexcessvolume.Inviewoftheseresults,itcanbe
anticipatedthattheviscosityofmixturesofalkanesand
perfluo-roalkanesmightbelowerthanthatexpectedfromtheviscosityof
thepurecomponents.
In this work we have measured the viscosity of mixtures
of(H6+F6) atthree temperatures, over thewholecomposition
range.Additionally,all-atommoleculardynamicssimulationshave
been performed and used to calculate viscosity and rotational
relaxation timesfor the studied mixtures, as wellas to
exam-inethemolecularlevelstructureviaradialdistributionfunctions.
Webelieve this isthefirst studyofthetransport properties of
alkane+perfluoroalkanemixtures.
2. Experimental
H6andF6,bothwith99%claimedpurity,werepurchasedfrom
Sigma–Aldrichandusedasreceived.Themixtureswereprepared
byweightin20mlscrew-capvials.Toensureinternalconsistency
oftheresults,theviscosityofH6wasmeasuredinthesame
experi-mentalconditionsasthemixtures.TheviscosityofF6wasrecently
measuredbyourgroup[2]usingthesamemethod,brieflyoutlined
below.
The viscosities were measured using a Schott-Geräte Type
545–00/0Ubbelhodeviscometer,withtheAVS440measuringunit.
Thisautomaticsystemcomprisesaviscometerstand(AVS/S)with
opticalsensors,anautomaticpumpingsystemandacontroland
recordingunit;theviscometerstandisimmersedinathermostatic
bath,withtemperaturestabilitybetterthan0.01K.Eachviscosity
reportedisobtainedfromtheaverageoffiveindependent
mea-surementsofflowtime, witha scatteringof lessthan0.2%;the
uncertaintyofeachflowtimemeasurementusingthisunitis0.01s.
Thetemperatureofthethermostaticbathwasmeasuredwitha
calibratedplatinumresistanceprobeconnected toa 5½ digital
multimeter(Keithley191),withanaccuracyof0.05Kanda
pre-cisionof0.01K.
ThedensityofallsampleswasmeasuredwithanAntonPaar
DMA5000vibrating-tubedensimeter,forthedeterminationofthe
dynamicviscosity.Thisinstrumentwascalibratedwithwater
(dis-tilled,deionizedina Milli-Q185Pluswater purificationsystem
andfreshlyboiled)andairat20.000◦C,takingintoaccount
atmo-sphericpressure;itsinternaltemperaturecontrolsystemisstable
at±0.001K.Thedensityoftheliquid mixtureswasdetermined
beforeandaftertheviscositymeasurements,inordertoestimate
anycompositionchangeduetodifferentialevaporationduringthe
measuringprocess.Theviscositiesweremeasuredat298K,303K
and308K,andthemeasurementat298Kwasrepeatedattheend
Table1
Density,relativevolumeandsimulatedrotationalrelaxationtimesatT=298Kasa functionofF6molarfraction.
x(F6) Density(gcm−3) Volumerelative topureH6 H6(ps) F6(ps) 0 0.655 1.000 12 – 0.25 0.956 1.111 11 17 0.50 1.207 1.194 12 19 0.75 1.457 1.266 13 23 1.0 1.672 1.333 – 27
oftheseriestofurtherassesstheeffectofeventualevaporation. Whenthetwomeasurements,compositionand/orviscosity,were differenttheaveragevaluewastaken.Thechangesincomposition wereestimatedtobealwayslessthan0.015molefraction.
Eventhoughthetemperaturewasconstantwithin±0.01K,it wasnotpossibletostabilizethetemperatureatexactlythesame valueforallthestudiedcompositions.Hence,reported temper-aturescorrespondtoan averagevalue of±0.1K.Thecombined uncertaintyofthemeasuredmixtureviscositiesisestimatedtobe lessthan1.5%.
3. Simulations
Tocompare withexperiment, atomistic moleculardynamics (MD)simulationshavebeenperformed.Theoptimizedpotentials for liquid simulations all-atom (OPLS-AA) forcefield, originally developedfor alkanes[8]andextended toperfluoroalkanes[9],
was used to model the molecules studied. The OPLS-AA force
fieldwasdevelopedtoaccuratelyreproduceexperimental
prop-ertiesofliquids,andrecentstudies[2,10]demonstrateexcellent
agreementwithexperimentforpressurevs.densityisothermsof
PFAAalkanes.SimulationswereperformedusingtheLAMMPS
sim-ulationengine[11],carried out in theNVTensemble (constant
numberofatoms,temperature,andvolume)atatemperatureof
298Ktomatchexperiment.Temperaturewascontrolledviathe
Nosé–Hoover thermostat; therRESPAmulti-timestep algorithm
wasusedwithtimestepsof0.1fsforbond,angle,anddihedral
interactions and time stepsof 1.0fsfor thenon-bonded
inter-actionsandelectrostaticinteractions,whicharecomputedusing
theparticle–particle,particle–meshalgorithm(PPPM).Simulations
wereconductedfor systemscomposedof256molecules.While
systemsizeNisconservedasthemolarratioofalkanesto
per-fluoroalkaneswaschanged,thesystemvolume wasadjustedto
theexperimentaldensityreportedbyBedfordandDunlap[12];the
densityandsystemvolumeratiosusedarereportedinTable1.
The rotational relaxation time of the individual H6 and F6
molecules was calculated for each composition. The rotational
relaxationtimeofeachmoleculewasestimatedusingthe
auto-correlationfunctionofthedotproductoftheend-to-endvectorof
themolecule: C(t)=
1 N N i=1ui.uj (1)whereNisthetotalnumberofmoleculesinthesystemandûiis
thedirectorofmoleculei.Toobtaintherelaxationtime,,C(t)isfit
usingtheKohlrausch–Williams–Wattsfunction[13]:
C(t)=˛exp
−t ˇ(2)
wheretcorrespondstothetimeand˛andˇarefitting
param-eters.Fittedrotationalrelaxationtimesat298K,roundedtothe
nearest picosecond, are reportedin Table 1 for each
composi-tion.UsingthecriteriaproposedbyMondelloandGrest[14]that
0 50 100 150 200
time (ps)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7(cP)
x(100) x(75) x(50) x(25) x(0)Fig.1. AverageviscositycalculatedasafunctionoftimefromsimulationatT=298K fortherangeofF6concentrations.
rotationalrelaxationtimeofthemoleculeinordertoobtain10%
statisticaluncertaintyinviscositycalculations,thisdatasuggests
a minimumof 5.4ns simulation time isneeded. Simulationsat
eachcompositionwereconductedinexcessof60ns(in3
indepen-dentsimulationsforeachcomposition),wellbeyondthisminimum
timeandofsufficientlengthtocapturefluctuationsinthespatial
arrangementofmoleculesinthemixtures.
ThezeroshearviscositywascalculatedusingtheGreen–Kubo
relation: = V kBT
∞ 0 Pij(0)Pij(t) dt (3)Inthisequation,Visthevolumeofthesystem,kBisthe
Boltz-mannconstant,Tis temperature,andtis time.ThequantityPij
correspondstotheijoff-diagonalcomponentofthepressure
ten-sor.Theaverageautocorrelationfunctionofthepressuretensoris
calculatedwithina200pswindow;sincethisquantitydependson
therelativetimedifference(i.e.,t–t0),theaverageautocorrelation
functionwasconstructedviatimeshiftingoftheorigin,witha
cor-relationoffsetof10fs.Ingeneral,theviscosityasafunctionoftime
plateausby∼50psintothiswindow(seeFig.1);theaverage
vis-cosityreportedinthisworkwascalculatedfrom20evenlyspaced
datapointsfrom100to200pswithinthisplateauedregion.To
pro-videanestimateoftheerrorinthesemeasurements,eachofthe
three20nssimulationtrajectoriesareconsideredindependently
andthestandarddeviationofthesethreeviscositymeasurements
isreportedastheerror.
4. Results
TheexperimentallymeasureddynamicviscosityofH6is
pre-sentedinTable2.Theresultscomparefavourablywithliterature
data[15](deviationsarelessthan0.5%).Table3reportsthe
experi-mentalviscositiesoftheH6+F6mixtures,aswellasthecalculated
Table2
ExperimentaldynamicviscosityofH6.
T/K /mPa.s
298.20 0.2937
303.16 0.2798
308.13 0.2669
Uncertaintyinviscositylessthan0.8%.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
(cP)
sim, 298K exp, 298K exp, 303K exp, 308K0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
x(F6)
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
100
/
(a)
(b)
Fig.2.(a)Experimentalandsimulatedviscosityof(H6+F6)mixtures,.(b)Relative viscositydeviationsfromthearithmeticmeanofthepurecomponentviscosities, /,fromexperimentandsimulation;forclaritythishasbeenexpandedbyafactor of100togivepercentdeviation.Thelegendappliestobothpanels.
deviationsfromthearithmeticmeanofpurecomponent viscosi-ties:
=exp−(F6xF6+H6xH6) (4)
Theexperimentalviscosityofthepurecompoundsateach tem-peraturewasinterpolatedusingtheAndradeequation[17].Fig.2a
plotstheviscositiescalculatedfromexperiment.
Relative viscosity deviations, /, are plotted in Fig. 2b.
AlthoughtheabsolutedeviationsshowninTable3decreasewith
increasingtemperature,thisisnotthecasefortherelativevalues
plottedinFig.2b.Thetemperaturedependenceoftherelative
vis-cositydeviationsisprobablywithintheestimatedexperimental
uncertainty.Measurementsinaclosedviscometer(without
evap-oration)wouldallowalargerrangeoftemperaturestobestudied.
Ascanbeseen,thehighestrelativeviscositydeviationhasavalue
ofabout−17%andislocatedbetweenx(F6)=0.5andx(F6)=0.7.
Table3
Experimentaldynamicviscosityof(H6+F6)mixtures,anddeviationsfromthearithmeticmeanofpurecomponentviscosities(Eq.(4)),.
x(F6) 298.0K 303.0K 308.0K
/mPa.s /mPa.s /mPa.s /mPa.s /mPa.s /mPa.s
0.000 0.294 – 0.280 – 0.267 – 0.243 0.341 −0.036 0.319 −0.036 0.299 −0.036 0.500 0.408 −0.057 0.375 −0.059 0.350 −0.058 0.500 0.407 −0.057 – – 0.352 −0.056 0.705 0.458 −0.076 0.428 −0.070 0.401 −0.064 0.727 0.468 −0.074 0.438 −0.067 0.410 −0.061 0.902 0.556 −0.045 0.520 −0.039 0.483 −0.037 1.000 0.635 – 0.589 – 0.548 –
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
x(F6)
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
(cP)
H6+F6 H6+H9Fig.3.ViscosityofH6+F6(298.0K)andH6+H9(298.15K)mixtures.Thelines representthearithmeticalmeanofpurecomponentviscosities.
Fig.2a alsoincludes viscositiescalculated fromthe
molecu-lardynamicssimulations,whichareadditionallysummarizedin
Table4.Thevaluescalculatedfromthesimulationsdemonstrate
closeagreementwithexperiment.Aspreviouslymentioned,the
simulationsweredoneattheexperimentaldensity.Itisknown
fromprevious work[16] that the forcefield usedis unableto
reproducetheexperimentalpositiveexcessvolume,even when
theH–Fcrossinteractionisreducedby25%,whichissufficientto
bringagreementbetweentheexperimentalandsimulatedexcess
enthalpy. It is interesting to note that simulations run at the
experimentaldensityproduceviscositiesthatagreecloselywith
experiment.Wealsonotethattherelativelylargeuncertaintyinthe
reportedviscosityforpureH6makesitdifficulttoprovidea
mean-ingfulcomparisonoftherelativeviscositydeviations,althoughthe
absoluteviscositydeviationsshowsimilarbehaviourtothatseen
experimentally.
5. Discussion
Itisknownthatbinarymixturesoftenshownegativeviscosity
deviations,asdefinedinEq.(4).Hence,mostpredictivemethods
fortheviscosityofmixturesproposetheuseofequationssimilarto
Eq.(4),butintermsofthelogarithmofviscosity,usingsubsequent
adjustableparameterswhicharefittedtoeachbinarymixture[17].
Toprovideadditionalinsightintothemixingbehaviour,Fig.3
comparestheexperimentalviscositiesofH6+F6mixturesat298K
withliteratureresults[18]forH6+nonane(H6+H9)at298.15K.
Thislatter mixturewaschosen becausetheviscosityofnonane
(0.66mPa.s) is close to that of F6 (0.635mPa.s) and because
bothcomponentshave,inthis case,verysimilarintermolecular
interactions,i.e.,dispersionforcesbetweenhydrogenatedchains
exclusively. As can be seen from Fig. 3, the (H6+H9) system
hasnegativedeviationsfromthelinearbehaviour,whichreacha
Table4
SimulateddynamicviscosityoftheH6+F6systemat298.0Kandthecalculated viscositydeviations. x(F6) /mPa.s /mPa.s 0.000 0.344±0.061 – 0.250 0.329±0.026 −0.085 0.500 0.380±0.006 −0.105 0.750 0.466±0.010 −0.089 1.000 0.625±0.034 –
maximumof5.5%attheequimolarcomposition.However,as pre-viouslyshown,thealkane+perfluoroalkanesystemshowsamuch largernegativeviscositydeviationwithamaximumof17%.The dif-ferenceintheseotherwisesimilarsystemsislikelyrelatedto(i)the significantvolumeincreaseassociatedwithH6+F6mixtures;(ii) therigidityofthefluorinatedmolecule;(iii)theweaknessofthe crossinteractionbetweenalkylicandfluorinatedchains.As pre-viouslydiscussed,themolarvolumeofperfluoroalkanesinfinitely dilutedinn-alkanesincreasesby13%,whereasthemolarvolume ofn-alkanesdissolvedinn-perfluoroalkanesincreasesby20%;also recallthatthevolumeofpureF6islargerthanthevolumeofpure H6byafactorof1.33.
Tofurtherexploretheeffectofvolumeofthesesystemsatthe molecularlevel,theradial distributionfunction(RDF)hasbeen calculatedfromthesimulation trajectories;thefirstpeaks, cor-respondingto thenearest neighbourdistances, are highlighted
inFig.4.TheRDFiscalculatedbetweenthecarbonatomsinthe
moleculebackbone(excludingdistances betweenatomsonthe
samechain) asa function ofmolecularspecies. Fig.4a–cshow
theRDFsfor H6–H6,H6–F6,and F6–F6,respectively. Thereis a
significant increase in the width and the intensity of the first
peak oftheH6–H6 RDFas F6isadded tothesystem(Fig.4a),
whereasboththepeakwidthandthepeakintensityremain
rel-ativelyunchangedintheothertwocases.In theH6–H6RDF,as
theF6molefractionisincreasedfrom0to0.75,thepeakwidth,
asestimatedfromthelocationofthefirstminimum,increasesby
∼1 ˚A.ThissuggeststhatthevolumeaccessibletoaH6molecule
thatisincontactwithotherH6moleculesincreasesasF6isadded
tothesystem.Recall thattheexcess volumefor this systemis
positiveandlarge,∼5cm3mol−1,andthatthesimulationswere
performed at the experimental density. The simulation results
seemtoindicatethataportionofthisincreasedvolumeismore
efficiently taken by H6, probably aidedby its higherflexibility
relativelytoF6(e.g.,intheequimolarmixture,theaverage
end-to-enddistanceofthecarbonbackboneis6.10±0.04 ˚AforH6and
6.38±0.03 ˚AforF6).Thus,asF6isaddedtothesystemthe
effec-tivedensityoftheH6fractiondecreases,whichshouldresultin
areductioninthecontributiontothetotalviscosityofthe
mix-ture.These findings are compatible withtheincrease of molar
4
6
8
10
0.8
1.0
1.2
x = 100 x = 75 x = 50 x = 25 x = 04
6
8
10
r (Å)
0.8
1.0
1.2
4
6
8
10
0.8
1.0
1.2
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig.4.Radialdistributionfunction(RDF)calculatedbetweenthecarbonatomsofthecompoundsasafunctionofF6concentration,x,for:(a)H6–H6(b)H6–F6,and(c)F6–F6. Thelegendin(b)appliestoallpanels.NotetheRDFonlyincludesatomsonseparatechains.
volumeatinfinitedilutionofH6whendissolvedinF6.However,the
simulationsshownodirectexplanationfortheincreaseofpartial
molarvolumeatinfinitedilutionofF6whendissolvedinalkanes.
Thiscouldindicatethepresenceofamoresubtleeffect,solvophobic
inorigin.Theincreaseofthewidthandintensityofthefirstpeakof
theH6–H6RDFasF6isaddedtothesystemcouldalsobethesignof
anincipientsegregationbetweenthetwosubstancesandthe
cor-respondingformationofalkaneandperfluoroalkanerichdomains.
Thishypothesiswillbeinvestigatedinfuturework.
Re-examinationoftherotationalrelaxationtimesreportedin
Table1providesadditionalinsightintotheroleofmolecular
rigid-ity.WhiletherotationalrelaxationofH6isrelativelyunchangedat
allstatepoints,therotationalrelaxationtimeofF6increases
sig-nificantlyastheF6concentrationisincreased.Statepointswith
shorterrotationalrelaxationtimesshouldexhibitincreased
rota-tionalfreedom;withlessencumberedmolecularmotion,itwould
beexpectedthattheviscosityshouldbereduced,reducingthe
con-tributiontothetotalviscosityofthemixture.This,incombination
withtheincreasedaccessiblevolumeofH6asF6isaddedtothe
system,islikelythecauseofthesignificantdeviationsseeninboth
experimentandsimulation.
6. Conclusions
Theeffectofmixinghydrogenatedandfluorinatedmolecules
onthe viscosityof the mixture hasbeen assessedfor thefirst
time.TheviscosityofH6+F6hasbeenmeasuredoverthewhole
compositionrange,atthreetemperaturesandshowslarge
nega-tivedeviationsfromthearithmeticmeanoftheviscositiesofthe
purecomponents,reaching−17%atx(F6)=0.7.Theresultsobtained
frommoleculardynamicssimulationsfollowthetrendexhibited
bytheexperiments,andgiveadditionalinsightintothemolecular
levelbehaviour.Specifically,itisseenthatthevolumeaccessibleto
H6moleculesincreasesasF6isaddedandtherotationalrelaxation
timeofF6issignificantlyreducedasH6concentrationincreases;
thesetwofactorslikelycontributeforthestrongnon-linearmixing
behaviourseeninbothexperimentandsimulation.Theseresults
correlatewiththerecentlyreportedvolumeexpansionsobserved
inalkane+perfluoroalkanemixtures.
Acknowledgements
PM acknowledges funding from Fundac¸ão para a
Ciên-cia e Tecnologia, in the form of a Post-Doctoral Grant (Ref.:
SFRH/BPD/81748/2011).CMC,CRI,JBLandJBacknowledgepartial
supportfromtheNationalScienceFoundationundergrantnumber
OCI-1047828.JBalsoacknowledgessupportfromtheDepartment
ofEducationforaGraduateAssistanceinAreasofNationalNeed
(GAANN)FellowshipundergrantnumberP200A090323.
References
[1]I.A.McLure,P.J.Clements,Shearviscosityofhexane+tetradecafluorohexane neartheuppercriticalendpoint,Ber.Bunsenges.Phys.Chem.101(1997) 114–119.
[2]P.Morgado,C.M.C.Laginhas,J.B.Lewis,C.McCabe,L.F.G.Martins,E.J.M. Fil-ipe,Viscosityofliquidperfluoroalkanesandperfluoroalkylalkanesurfactants, J.Phys.Chem.B115(2011)9130–9139.
[3]P.Kirsch,ModernFluoroorganicChemistry,Wiley-VCH,Weinheim,2004. [4]S.S.Jang,M.Blanco,W.A.Goddard,G.Caldwell,R.B.Ross,Thesourceofhelicity
inperfluorinatedn-alkanes,Macromolecules36(2003)5331–5341. [5]P.Morgado,R.Tomás,H.Zhao,M.C.dosRamos,F.J.Blas,C.McCabe,E.J.M.Filipe,
Solutionbehaviorofperfluoroalkanesandperfluoroalkylalkanesurfactantsin n-octane,J.Phys.Chem.C111(2007)15962–15968.
[6]P.Morgado,H.Rodrigues,F.J.Blas,C.McCabe,E.J.M.Filipe,Perfluoroalkanesand perfluoroalkylalkanesurfactantsinsolution:partialmolarvolumesinn-octane andhetero-SAFT-VRmodelling,FluidPhaseEquilib.306(2011)76–81. [7]L.Lepori,E.Matteoli,A.Spanedda,C.Duce,M.R.Tiné,Volumechangesonmixing
perfluoroalkaneswithalkanesorethersat298.15K,FluidPhaseEquilib.201 (2002)119–134.
[8]W.L.Jorgensen, D.S.Maxwell,J.Tirado Rives,Developmentandtestingof theOPLSall-atomforcefieldonconformationalenergeticsandpropertiesof organicliquids,J.Am.Chem.Soc.118(1996)11225–11236.
[9]E.K.Watkins,W.L.Jorgensen,Perfluoroalkanes:conformationalanalysisand liquid-statepropertiesfromabinitioandMonteCarlocalculations,J.Phys. Chem.A105(2001)4118–4125.
[10]P.Morgado,J.B.Lewis,C.M.C.Laginhas,L.F.G.Martins,C.McCabe,F.J.Blas, E.J.M.Filipe,Systemsinvolvinghydrogenatedandfluorinatedchains: volumet-ricpropertiesofperfluoroalkanesandperfluoroalkylalkanesurfactants,J.Phys. Chem.B115(2011)15013–15023.
[11]S.Plimpton,Fastparallelalgorithmsforshort-rangemolecular-dynamics,J. Comput.Phys.117(1995)1–19.
[12]R.G.Bedford,R.D.Dunlap,Solubilitiesandvolumechangesattendingmixing forthesystem:perfluoro-n-hexane-n-Hexane,J.Am.Chem.Soc.80–2(1958) 282–285.
[13]G.Williams,D.C.Watts,Non-symmetricaldielectricrelaxationbehaviour aris-ingfromasimpleempiricaldecayfunction,Trans.FaradaySoc.(1970)80–86, 66-565P.
[14]M.Mondello,G.S.Grest,Viscositycalculationsofn-alkanesbyequilibrium moleculardynamics,J.Chem.Phys.106(1997)9327–9336.
[15]P.J.Linstrom,W.G.Mallard(Eds.),NISTChemistryWebBook,NISTStandard Ref-erenceDatabaseNumber69,NationalInstituteofStandardsandTechnology, GaithersburgMD,20899,http://webbook.nist.gov,(retrieved20.07.11). [16]W.Song,P.J.Rossky,M.Maroncelli,Modelingalkane+perfluoroalkane
interac-tionsusingall-atompotentials:failureoftheusualcombiningrules,J.Chem. Phys.119(2003)9145–9162.
[17]B.E.Poling,J.M.Prausnitz,J.P.O’Connell,ThePropertiesofGasesandLiquids, 5thed.,McGraw-Hill,NewYork,2001.
[18]A.Aucejo,M.C.Burguet,R.Munoz,J.L.Marques,Densities,viscosities,and refractiveindicesofsomen-alkanebinaryliquidsystemsat298.15K,J.Chem. Eng.Data.40(1995)141–147.