• Nenhum resultado encontrado

The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models"

Copied!
51
0
0

Texto

Loading

Imagem

Figure 1. Box and whisker plot for all POA, SOA and OA global budgets and comparison with AeroCom phase I (Textor et al., 2006, 2007) results
Figure 2. Top row: POA emissions included in models (before POA evaporation in the case of GISS-CMU-VBS); middle row: SOA chemical production (including the pseudo-primary SOA source, where applicable); bottom row: total OA sources (sum of top and middle r
Figure 3. Same as in Fig. 2, for the POA/SOA/OA load.
Figure 4. Same as in Fig. 2, for the dry/wet OA deposition.
+7

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Intra-seasonal variability of smoke aerosol optical depth (AOD) and downwelling solar irradiance at the surface during the 2002 biomass burning season in South Amer- ica was

Positive matrix factorization analysis of the TPOT AMS organic mass spectra yielded a primary biomass burning factor and four oxygenated organic aerosol factors directly..

In the upper troposphere, Northern Hemisphere PAN mixing ratios peak in summer, with contributions from an- thropogenic sources, biomass burning and lightning.. This summertime

The analysis of the biomass burning plume composition mixing with the freshly emit- ted urban aerosol population in Singapore highlighted the very high concentrations of primary

The structure of the remelting zone of the steel C90 steel be- fore conventional tempering consitute cells, dendritic cells, sur- rounded with the cementite, inside of

Firstly, demand models of labour used in land preparation, planting, weeding, harvesting, primary processing, and the total amount of labour consumed during the season were

The most important difference between the Markov models and other models of economic evaluation in health science is the state of a patient during a specific moment

The use of factorial bioenergetic models, integrated with the hydrodynamic model, aids in determining the waste load and in adjusting the values used to calculate