• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Scalp cooling to prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia,

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Scalp cooling to prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia,"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texto

(1)

Anais

Brasileiros

de

Dermatologia

www.anaisdedermatologia.org.br

REVIEW

Scalp

cooling

to

prevent

chemotherapy-induced

alopecia

夽,夽夽

Giselle

de

Barros

Silva

a,∗

,

Kathryn

Ciccolini

b

,

Aline

Donati

c

,

Corina

van

den

Hurk

d

aCenterofOncology,HospitalAlemãoOswaldoCruz,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

bDepartmentofHematology/Oncology,MountSinaiHospital,NewYork,NY,UnitedStatesofAmerica cDepartmentofDermatology,HospitaldoServidorPúblicoMunicipaldeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil dR&DDepartment,NetherlandsComprehensiveCancerOrganisation,Utrecht,TheNetherlands

Received29August2019;accepted20March2020 Availableonline16June2020

KEYWORDS Alopecia; Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; Cooling; Drugtherapy; Preventionand mitigation

Abstract Chemotherapy-inducedalopeciacausesanimportantimpactoncancerpatientsand itsriskofpersistenceiscurrentlyaconsiderableissueincancersurvivors.Ofthevarious inter-ventions proposed for the prevention ofchemotherapy-induced alopecia, scalp cooling has emergedasaneffective andsafe strategy.Thispaperaimstoprovideanoverviewonscalp coolingandchemotherapy-inducedalopeciaprevention.

©2020SociedadeBrasileira deDermatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEspa˜na,S.L.U.Thisisan openaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Howtocitethisarticle:SilvaGB,CiccoliniK,DonatiA,HurkC.

Scalpcoolingtopreventchemotherapy-inducedalopecia.AnBras Dermatol.2020;95:631---7.

夽夽Studyconducted atthe HospitalAlemãoOswaldoCruz, São

Paulo,SP,Brazil.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:gisellebarros@yahoo.com.br(G.B.Silva).

Introduction

Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) is one of the most reportedunpredictableadverseevents(AEs)experiencedby cancerpatientsandsurvivors,1withanoverallincidenceof

65%.2Ithasbeenreportedasthemostdisturbingcondition

ofcancertreatmentbymost(88%)womenreceiving periop-erativechemotherapy.1Patientsmaydeclinelife-prolonging

chemotherapy to avoid developing alopecia.1,3,4

Further-more,CIAstrongly influences howothersperceive cancer patients,thevisibilityofdisease,socialrelationships,and

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2020.03.005

0365-0596/©2020SociedadeBrasileiradeDermatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEspa˜na,S.L.U.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

(2)

sexuality.1,3,5Inadditiontophysicalandpsychosocial

impair-ment, CIA can also be financially detrimental due to expensivecosmeticproductssuchaswigsandhairregrowth treatments.6

ManystrategieshavebeentestedtominimizeCIA,among whichscalpcoolinghasproventobethemosteffective.7,8

Since recent publications on its efficacy and safety as a preventivemethodagainstCIA,7---9 thisprocedurehasbeen

increasinglyemployedinBrazilandworldwide.TheNational Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice GuidelinesinOncologyhaverecentlyaddeda recommenda-tionofscalpcoolingtreatmentforCIAprevention(category 2A)forbreastcancerpatients.10

The presentarticle aimstoprovidean overviewof CIA andscalpcoolingsothatdermatologistscanbecome famil-iarwiththesetopics,whichhavebecomemorecommonin clinicalpractice.

Understanding

chemotherapy-induced

alopecia

Most chemotherapeutic agents are cytotoxic drugs that affectproliferatingcancercells.Othernormally proliferat-ingcells, e.g.,thehair matrix cells(in anagenphase90% of the time) and bone marrow, are unintentional targets of chemotherapy. Patientsreceiving --- among other drugs --- anthracyclines(i.e.,doxorubicinandepirubicin),taxanes (i.e.,docetaxelandpaclitaxel),oretoposidedevelop alope-cia,oftenreferredtoasanageneffluvium(Fig.1).8,11---14

Clinically,alopeciaismostnoticeableonthescalp,which hasthehighestdensity ofterminalhairfolliclesinanagen phase,andtypicallyappearswithindaystoweeksafter ini-tiationoftreatmentwithmanychemotherapeuticagents.14

Theinterruptionofhairfolliclemitoticactivitycontributes tothefragilityoftheproximalportionofthehairshaft,and consequentlybreakagewithinthehaircanal.2After

cessa-tionofchemotherapy,inmostcases,regrowthbeginswithin 1---3months;however, itcanpresent withchangesin tex-ture,color,and/orthickness.13---15 Dependingonthedegree

Figure 1 Chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Breast cancer patientattheendofthetreatmentwithfourcyclesof doxoru-bicinandcyclophosphamide (PhotocourtesyofLíviaNicoletti Ariano).

ofhair-folliclestem-celldamage,regrowthgenerallytakes uptosixmonthsaftercessationofchemotherapy.8,14

The trichoscopic findingsof CIA show thechanges suf-fered by thehair shaftthroughout chemotherapy, varying accordingtothephaseofthetreatment.Brokenhairs,black dots,flamehairs,andPohl-Pinkusconstrictionsmaybeseen inthe firstmonthsofchemotherapy. Additionally, regrow-ing hairs,rare terminal hairs,and circlehairs areusually observedattheendofthetreatment(Fig.2).16

Consideringthetypeofthechemotherapeuticagent,the incidenceofCIAmayrangefrom60%to100%with topoiso-meraseinhibitors(i.e.,irinotecan,etoposide,doxorubicin), >80% with taxanes (i.e., docetaxel, paclitaxel), and >60% withalkylatingagents(i.e.;cyclophosphamide,ifosfamide), whereas antimetabolites (i.e.; 5FU, methotrexate, gemc-itabine)presentalowerrisk.17,18

Besidesthechemotherapydrugtype,commonrisk fac-tors for CIA include dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and combination regimens with various concurrent cytotoxic agents.14 The degree of hair loss can also varywith age,

comorbidities,andnutritional/hormonalstatus.14

Persistentchemotherapy-inducedalopecia:an increasingconcern

In some instances,hair loss may bepersistent (persistent chemotherapy-inducedalopecia,PCIA),whichisdefinedas theabsenceorsuboptimalhairgrowthpersistingbeyondsix monthsaftercessationofchemotherapy.13Theincidenceof

PCIAcanrangefrom14%inchildhoodcancersurvivorsto30% inbreastcancersurvivors.19Inthe1990s,thefirstreported

casesof PCIAoccurredafterhigh-dosechemotherapy reg-imens (busulfan and cyclophosphamide) received before bonemarrowtransplantation.20Radiationandtaxane-based

chemotherapyregimenshavealsobeen involvedinPCIA.21

In a recent cohort ofAsian breastcancer patients,about 42% had PCIA afterthree yearsof chemotherapy comple-tion,withhigherriskusingtaxanes,whichappeartobemore cytotoxicto hair-follicle stem cells.15 Relevant impacton

self-imagewasreportedinthosepatients.15,22

Figure2 Trichoscopyofchemotherapy-inducedalopecia. Tri-choscopicfindingsintheregionofthevertexofthescalpofthe patientinfig.1:multipleblackdots,circularhair,andgrowing hair.Rareterminalhairs,someshowingpointsofconstriction (Pohl-Pinkus)intheirextension,referringtopreviouscyclesof chemotherapy(PhotocourtesyofLíviaNicolettiAriano).

(3)

Strategiesforchemotherapy-inducedalopecia prevention

Considering the impactof CIA in cancer patients, several medications and procedures have been tested to reduce or preventCIA. A large numberof studies have used ani-mal models, with variable and not yet clinically proven results.23---28 Afewproductshavebeentestedinhumansin

small studies with positive results, but more evidence is lacking, exceptforscalpcooling, whosesafetyand effec-tiveness have been frequently described in recent years (Table1).Sometopicals,suchasminoxidilorbimatoprost, havebeen showneffectivein stimulationofhairregrowth afterchemotherapy,withnopreventiveeffectonCIA.29---44

Sincethe1970s,avarietyofscalpcoolingtechniques ---such as cryogel bags, cold caps, and cooling machines ---havebeen usedfor CIAprevention.12,25---28 Coldcaps(e.g.,

Elasto-gel,Penguin)andelectroniccoolingmachines(e.g., Paxman,Dignitana)arethemostusedworldwide.

InBrazil,threedeviceshaveapprovalfromtheBrazilian Health Regulatory Agency(Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária[ANVISA])forscalpcoolingduringchemotherapy: Elasto-gel,PaxmanandCapelli.Thelatterisadevicemade inBrazil,usingcoldair,whosestudiesregardingitsefficacy areabouttobepublished.

Workingmechanism

The beneficial effects of scalp cooling are caused by vasoconstriction in the scalp skin, decreased intrafollicu-larmetabolic rate,anddecreasedfollicular drugsuptake, whichintheoryreducefollicularexposuretoharmful cyto-toxiceffectsattheirpeakplasmaconcentrations.3,11,45---48 Efficacy

Theefficacyofscalpcoolingwasrecentlyconfirmedby Nan-giaetal.inarandomized-controlledtrialwithearly-stage breast cancer patients that received at least four cycles of taxane- and/or anthracycline-based chemotherapy, in which the experimental group used a Paxman device for scalp cooling,started 30min prior chemotherapy infusion

and maintained throughout infusion and for 90min after infusion.Inthescalpcoolinggroup,successwasreportedin 50.5%ofwomen(50.5%;95%CI40.7---60.4%)comparedto0% inthecontrolgroup(0%;95%CI0---7.6%).9Rugoetal.,ina

recentsystematicreviewandmeta-analysiswhichincluded tenrandomizedcontrolledtrials(twowithaPaxmandevice and the others with cryogel caps or bag), endorsed the positiveeffectof scalpcooling inreducingCIAinpatients withsolidtumors (RR=0.54; 95%CI 0.46---0.63; I2¼=11%;

p<0.00001).7Shahetal.analyzedcontrolledand

random-izedclinical trials (CCTand RCT, respectively) evaluating scalp hypothermia for CIA prevention, with reduction in theincidence of CIA by 2.7 (in CCT) to3.9 fold (in RCT) in scalp-cooled patients. There were 18 trials included in the review, with different scalp cooling techniques ---rangingfromolderandlesscomplexcoolingcapstodigitally controlledmachines.49ScalpcoolingmachinesfromPaxman

andDignitana have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration(FDA),andhavebeenincorporatedintothe NCCNguidelinesforbreastcancerpatients.

Pre-coolingtimeandpost-infusioncoolingtime

Theduration ofscalp coolingappears tobean influential factor in hair preservation.50 Cooling is generally started

30minbeforeinfusion(pre-coolingtime[PCT])sothatthe scalpskin temperaturehasreacheditslowestpeakatthe momentthedrugentershairfollicles. Intradermalor sub-cutaneousscalptemperatureduringscalpcoolingtendsto beon average around 22◦C,the target temperature sug-gestedbyGregoryetal.51However,lowscalptemperature

rangemayvaryfromone patienttoanother for unknown reasons.Itmaybeduetodifferencesintheinsulatingaction ofscalpstructures(hair,dermis,andsubcutaneoustissue), heatdissipation,skullanatomy,andreflexthermalreaction tovasoconstriction.Those withintradermal scalp temper-aturelowerthan18◦Caremorelikelytohave betterhair protectionwithscalpcooling.49,52

The cooling procedure is maintained during the chemotherapyinfusion andkeptforaperiodoftimeafter itsend(post-infusioncoolingtime[PICT]),dependingonthe chemotherapyregimen.

Table1 Preventivestrategiesforchemotherapy-inducedalopecia(CIA)inanimalmodelsandinhumantrials Studiedinanimalmodels Studiedinhumantrials:not

effective

Studiedinhumantrials:effective

Anti-doxorubicin29 Topicalminoxidil23 AS101a30

Topicalepinephrineandnorepinephrine31 Parathyroidhormonereceptor (PPR)ligands32

Scalpcooling9,33,34 Topicaln-acetylcysteine35 Scalptourniquet36

Topicalantioxidants(resveratrol,aminothiol)31 Topicalcalcitriol37 TopicalcyclosporineA38 DHL-HisZnNA39 Immunomodulators(Il-1,40imuvert41)

AcidFGF,EGF40 CDK2inhibitors42 Caspase-3inhibitors43

Multi-targetironchelatorM3044

(4)

Some studies involving cold caps reported they were unabletomaintainlow temperaturesfor theentire dura-tionoftheplannedtreatmenttime.Ithas,however,been suggested that the caps shouldbe changed three tofour times,or every25min, duringthe chemotherapy infusion andPICT,toensureastabletemperature.48However,

cool-ingmachines with thermostatmanagement keep a stable temperatureandrequirefewernursinginterventions.18

To date, the precise durationof thePICT is yet tobe estimated. Ideally, the PICT should consider the pharma-cokinetics of exposure to the cytotoxic agent and/or its activemetabolites, whichcorrespondtopeakplasma con-centrations,drug half-life, and potential interactions.28,50

Consideringpatientstreatedwithdocetaxelregimens,PICTs of90’and45’hadsimilarresultspreventinghairloss(79%

vs.95% of patientswith success,respectively; p=0.04).53

Komenetal.studiedPICTsof20’and45’,alsoinpatients taking docetaxel, with comparable rates of hair reten-tion (73% vs. 79% of patients with success, respectively;

p=0.5).54Inanthracyclineregimens,PICTsof90’orgreater

areoftenused;however,prolongingPICTshowedno reduc-tionin theneed for scalp coverage.55 Further studies are

needed to determine the most effective PICT for each chemotherapyregimen.

Hairlossassessmentandscalpcoolingresults

The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) is largely used in oncology to systematize the adverseeventsofcancertreatment.AccordingtotheCTCAE v.5.0,alopeciagrade1correspondstolessthan50%ofhair loss,notrequiringtheuseofawigoraheadcover;in alope-ciagrade2,hairlossismorethan50%,andawigorascarf isnecessary.56 Amodified Dean’sscale forhair lossis also

usedtoquantifytheseverityofCIA(grade0:nohairloss; grade1:0to≤25%hairloss;grade2:>25%to≤50%hairloss; grade3:>50to≤75%hairloss;grade4:>75%hairloss).In theliterature,scalpcoolingisgenerallyconsidered success-fulwhenalopeciaislessthan50%(CTCAEv.5.0grade0or 1;modifiedDean’sscalegrade0.1or2).9,34,57

Factorsinfluencingscalpcoolingsuccess

The success of scalp cooling may vary according to the chemotherapeutic drug, dose, and combination, and also depends on the scalp temperature achieved, duration of cooling,andproper fitting of thecap.33,48,58 In the

litera-ture,thereisvariabilityinthesuccessratesofscalpcooling forthesamechemotherapyregimenanddose.Consideration shouldbegiventothestudydesign,population character-istics, applied technique, PCT/PICT, hair loss assessment scale,andtheselectedsuccesscriteria.InaDutchregistry studywith1411patients(scalpcoolingperformedwith Pax-mandevices),regimenswithlow-dosedocetaxel(75mg/m2)

andpaclitaxel (70---90mg/m2)showedbetter ratesof

suc-cesswithscalpcooling(94%and81%,respectively)whereas amongpatientstakinganthracyclineandcyclophosphamide, 39%weresuccessful.33Rugoetal.reportedsuccessin66.3%

of patientsreceiving taxanes withscalp coolingwith Dig-nitanadevices.34 Nangiaet al.reportedthat scalp-cooled

patientsusingPaxmandevicesundertaxane-basedregimens

aremorelikelytohavehigherratesofhairpreservation(59% success;paclitaxelusedweeklyismoreeffectivethan doc-etaxel used every three weeks) than anthracycline-based chemotherapy(16%success).9

Scalpcoolingandcutaneousscalpskinmetastases

Since the first reports of scalp cooling studies, safety concerns have been raised regarding the possibility that chemotherapy doesnotsufficientlytreat pre-existing sub-clinicalscalpskinmetastases.59Theincidenceofmetastases

in scalp-cooled breast cancer patients appears to be less than1.1%,whichiswithintherates(0.03---3%)reportedin breastcancerpatientstreatedwithoutscalpcooling.46,60In

astudyinvolving442patientsusingacoldcap,theoverall incidenceofscalpskinmetastaseswas0.45%(2/442), occur-ringin0.88%(2/227)ofbreastcancerpatients.59Similarlow

ratesofscalpskinmetastases(7/640,1.1%)werealsonoted inaretrospectivecohortstudyofwomenwithbreast can-cer, wherein the majority (86.4%) had been offeredscalp coolingatsomepointduringtheirtreatment.Itis notewor-thy that in neithercase didscalpmetastases manifest as thefirstisolatedsiteofrecurrence---womenwhohadahigh riskofbreastcancerrecurrence,suchasthoseinstageIII, weremorelikelytohavemetastasesinthescalp,inaddition tootherorgans.61Althoughadditionalresearchwithlonger

follow-up is needed to establish a clear association, data availableindicatethatthereis noincreasedriskofapoor outcomewithscalpcoolinginbreastcancerpatients.7,62

However, regression of scalp skin metastases, despite scalpcooling,hasalsobeenreported(twocases),suggesting thatthedistributionofchemotherapyatthesesitesisnot completely prevented.59,63 Nevertheless, in patients with

bloodcancerspresentingwithcancercellsalloverthebody (e.g. leukemia,lymphoma), scalpcooling is currently not recommended.46,64Witmanetal.reportedacaseofmycosis

fungoidesthatdisappeared withconsolidation chemother-apybutrecurredonthescalp.64Anotherinstanceofrelapse

wasdescribedina17-year-oldboywhoseacutemyeloblastic leukemiamanifestedwithseveralsubcutaneous scalp nod-ules but withnoevidenceof hematologicalrelapse seven yearsaftertheuseofscalpcoolingduringhistwocourses ofchemotherapy.65

Adverseeventsandcontraindicationsforscalp cooling

Scalpcoolinghasbeenshowntobeawell-tolerated support-ivecare.49,66 The mostcommonly reportedAEswithscalp

coolingarelow-gradeandincludeheadaches,nausea, dizzi-ness,complaintsofcoldness,andclaustrophobia.Frostbite wasreportedinafewcaseswithcoldcaps,whichare usu-allybelow−25◦Cbeforebeingappliedtothepatient’shead; nonehasbeenreportedwithcoolingmachines.9,33,50,58,67,68

Hairlessareas(e.g.,forehead,ears,scalpalopecia)should beprotectedduringscalpcooling,usingasimplebandage.

Scalp cooling is not indicated for patients with cold agglutinin disease, cryoglobulinemia, cryofibrinogenemia, orcoldsensitivity.50Itisnotrecommendedforpatientswith

hematologic tumors,whoareat higherrisk for cutaneous metastases.

(5)

Scalpcoolingandimpactonqualityoflifeand well-being

Althoughtheuse ofscalpcoolinghasbecomeincreasingly widespreadtopreventCIA,studieshaveshowninconsistent evidenceofimprovementinpatients’qualityoflife(QoL), reportedlyduetononspecificQoLassessments(most stud-iesusedEORTCQLQ-C30and-BR23),differencesinmethods andoutcomesreportingQoLandoverallcostandfinancial burdenofscalpcooling.47Whenscalpcoolingdoesnotwork

asexpected,theimpactonQoLisworsewhencomparedto controls,i.e.,patientsnotusingscalpcooling.33Therefore,

anappropriateQoLinstrumentisstillsought.Inoneofthe firstmulti-centeredprospectivestudiesdesignedto inves-tigatethe impactonwell-being in breastcancer patients receivingscalp cooling(98/266), 52% of thepatients who experienced effective scalp cooling reportedbetter well-being when compared to patients in whom this was not achieved.69

Final

considerations

Scalpcooling is an approved and generallywell-tolerated option to prevent CIA and can minimize the burden of cancer treatment and potential impairments in patients’ health-relatedQoLandpsychosocialwell-being.Whilethe type of scalp cooling method might not be decisive, maintaining stable low scalp skin temperatures is cru-cial.Patientsreceivinganthracycline-basedregimenshave lower rates of hair retention compared to taxane-based chemotherapies.Patientswithhematologicalmalignancies and cold-precipitated diseases should not undergo scalp-coolingtherapy.Scalpcoolingdoesnotappeartoincrease theriskofcutaneousscalpmetastasesinearly-stagebreast cancerpatients,nordoes itappeartocompromisecancer outcome,althoughlong-termfollow-upstudiesareneeded.

Financial

support

Nonedeclared.

Authors’

contributions

Giselle de Barros Silva: Approval of final version of the manuscript; conception and planning of the study; draft-ingandeditingofthemanuscript;collection,analysis,and interpretationofdata;participationinstudydesign;critical reviewoftheliterature;criticalreviewofthemanuscript.

KathrynCiccoliniHernandez:Approvaloffinalversionof themanuscript;draftingandeditingofthemanuscript; par-ticipationinstudydesign;criticalreviewofthemanuscript. AlineDonati:Approvaloffinalversionofthemanuscript; criticalreviewofthemanuscript.

Corina van den Hurk: Approval of final version of the manuscript;criticalreviewofthemanuscript.

Conflicts

of

interest

Nonedeclared.

References

1.KiebertGM,HannekeJ,deHaesCJ,KievitJ,vandeVC.Effect ofperi-operativechemotherapyonthequalityoflifeofpatients withearlybreastcancer.EurJCancer.1990;26:1038---42.

2.TrüebRM.Chemotherapy-inducedalopecia.CurrOpinSupport PalliatCare.2010;4:281---4.

3.ProtièreC,EvansK,CamerloJ,d’IngradoMP,Macquart-Moulin G,ViensP,etal.Efficacyandtoleranceofascalp-coolingsystem forpreventionofhairlossandtheexperienceofbreast can-cerpatientstreatedbyadjuvantchemotherapy.SupportCare Cancer.2002;10:529---37.

4.ParkerR.Theeffectivenessofscalphypothermiain prevent-ing cyclophosphamide-inducedalopecia. Oncol NursyForum. 1987;14:49---53.

5.Auvinen PK,MähönenUA, SoininenKM,PaananenPK, Ranta-Koponen PH, Saavalainen IE, et al. The effectiveness of a scalpcoolingcapinpreventingchemotherapy-induced alope-cia.Tumori.2010;96:271---5.

6.MolsF,VanDenHurkCJ,VingerhoetsAJ,BreedWPM.Scalp cool-ingtopreventchemotherapy-inducedhairloss:practicaland clinicalconsiderations.SupportCareCancer.2009;17:181---9.

7.Rugo HS, Voigt J. Scalp hypothermia for preventing alope-cia during chemotherapy. a systematic review and meta-analysis ofrandomized controlled trials.Clin BreastCancer. 2018;18:19---28.

8.Shin H, Jo SJ, Kim DH, Kwon O, Myung SK. Efficacy of interventionsforpreventionofchemotherapy-induced alope-cia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E442---54.

9.NangiaJ,WangT,OsborneC,NiravathP,OtteK,PapishS,etal. Effectofascalpcoolingdeviceonalopeciainwomenundergoing chemotherapyforbreastcancer:theSCALPrandomizedclinical trial.JAMA.2017;317:596---605.

10.nccn.org. National Comprehensive Cancer Network; c2019. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/ physiciangls/pdf/breastblocks.pdf[cited20.08.19].

11.KatsimbriP,BamiasA,PavlidisN.Preventionof chemotherapy-inducedalopeciausinganeffectivescalpcoolingsystem.EurJ Cancer.2000;36:766---71.

12.RidderheimM,BjurbergM,GustavssonA.Scalphypothermiato preventchemotherapy-inducedalopeciaiseffectiveandsafe: apilotstudyofanewdigitizedscalp-coolingsystemusedin74 patients.SupportCareCancer.2003;11:371---7.

13.ChonSY,ChampionRW,GeddesER,RashidRM. Chemotherapy-inducedalopecia.JAmAcadDermatol.2012;67:e37---47.

14.PausR,HaslamIS,SharovAA,BotchkarevVA.Pathobiologyof chemotherapy-inducedhairloss.LancetOncol.2013;14:e50---9.

15.KangD,KimI,ChoiEK,ImYH,ParkYH,AhnJS,etal.Permanent chemotherapy-inducedalopeciainpatientswithbreastcancer: a3-yearprospectivecohortstudy.Oncologist.2019;24:414---20.

16.Rossi A, CaterinaFortuna M,Caro G, Cardone M,Garelli V, GrassiS,etal.Monitoringchemotherapy-inducedalopeciawith trichoscopy.JCosmetDermatol.2019;18:575---80.

17.Rossi A, Fortuna MC, Caro G, Pranteda G, Garelli V, Pom-pili U, et al. Chemotherapy-induced alopecia management: clinicalexperienceandpracticaladvice.JCosmetDermatol. 2017;16:537---41.

18.Dunnill CJ, Al-TameemiW, CollettA, HaslamIS, Georgopou-los NT. A clinical and biological guide for understanding chemotherapy-inducedalopeciaanditsprevention.Oncologist. 2018;23:84---96.

19.Freites-MartinezA,ShapiroJ,GoldfarbS,Nangia J,Jimenez JJ,PausR,etal.Hairdisordersincancerpatients.JAmAcad Dermatol.2019;80:1179---96.

20.Yeager CE, Olsen EA. Treatment of chemotherapy-induced alopecia.DermatolTher.2011;24:432---42.

(6)

21.Haider M, Hamadah I, Almutawa A. Radiation- and chemotherapy-induced permanent alopecia: case series. JCutanMedSurg.2013;17:55---61.

22.Freites-MartinezA,ChanD,SibaudV,ShapiroJ,FabbrociniG, TostiA,etal.Assessmentofqualityoflifeandtreatment out-comesofpatientswithpersistentpostchemotherapyalopecia. JAMADermatol.2019;155:724---8.

23.DuvicM,LemakNA,ValeroV,HymesSR,FarmerKL,Hortobagyi GN, etal. Arandomizedtrialofminoxidil in chemotherapy-inducedalopecia.JAmAcadDermatol.1996;35:74---8.

24.WirtaD,BaumannL,BruceS,AhluwaliaG,WengE,DanielsS. Safetyandefficacyofbimatoprostforeyelashgrowthin.JClin AesthetDermatol.2015;8:11---20.

25.Edelstyn GA,MacDonald M,MacRae KD.Doxorubicin-induced hair lossand possiblemodification byscalp cooling.Lancet. 1977;2:253---4.

26.DeanJC,GriffithKS,CetasTC, MackelCL,JonesSE,Salmon SE.Scalphypothermia:acomparisonoficepacksandtheKold Kapinthepreventionofdoxorubicin-inducedalopecia.JClin Oncol.1983;1:33---7.

27.PeckHJ,MitchellH,StewartAL.Evaluatingtheefficacyofscalp coolingusingthePenguincoldcapsystemtoreducealopecia inpatientsundergoingchemotherapyforbreastcancer.EurJ OncolNurs.2000;4:246---8.

28.MasseyCS.Amulticentrestudytodeterminetheefficacyand patientacceptability ofthePaxman ScalpCoolerto prevent hairlossinpatientsreceivingchemotherapy.EurJOncolNurs. 2004;8:121---30.

29.BalsariAL,MorelliD,MénardS,VeronesiU,ColnaghiMI. Protec-tionagainstdoxorubicin-inducedalopeciainratsby liposome-entrappedmonoclonalantibodies.FASEBJ.1994;8:226---30.

30.SredniB, XuRH, AlbeckM,GafterU, GalR, Shani A,et al. The protective role of the immunomodulator AS101 against chemotherapy-inducedalopeciastudiesonhumanandanimal models.IntJCancer.1996;65:97---103.

31.SorefCM,FahlWE.Anewstrategytopreventchemotherapyand radiotherapy-inducedalopeciausingtopicallyapplied vasocon-strictor.IntJCancer.2015;136:195---203.

32.Skrok A, Bednarczuk T, Skwarek A, Popow M, Rudnicka L, OlszewskaM.Theeffectofparathyroidhormonesonhairfollicle physiology: implications for treatment of chemotherapy-inducedalopecia.SkiPharmacolPhysiol.2015;28:213---25.

33.vandenHurkCJ,PeerboomsM,vandePoll-FranseLV,Nortier JW, Coebergh JW, Breed WP. Scalp cooling for hair preser-vation and associated characteristics in 1411 chemotherapy patients --- results ofthe Dutch Scalp Cooling Registry. Acta Oncol.2012;51:497---504.

34.Rugo HS, Klein P, Melin SA, Hurvitz SA, Melisko ME, Moore A, et al. Associationbetween useof a scalp cooling device and alopecia after chemotherapy for breast cancer. JAMA. 2017;317:606---14.

35.Jiménez JJ, Huang HS, Yunis AA. Treatment

with ImuVert/N-acetylcysteine protects rats from cyclophosphamide/cytarabine-induced alopecia. Cancer Invest.1992;10:271---6.

36.Maxwell MB. Scalp tourniquets for chemotherapy-induced alopecia.AmJNurs.1980;80:900---3.

37.PausR,SchilliMB,HandjiskiB,MenradA,HenzBM,PlonkaP. Topicalcalcitriolenhancesnormalhairregrowthbutdoesnot preventchemotherapy-inducedalopeciainmice.CancerRes. 1996;56:4438---43.

38.Hussein A, Stuart A, Peters WP. Protection against chemotherapy-induced alopecia by cyclosporin a in the newbornratanimalmodel.Dermatology.1995;190:192---6.

39.Sagawa N,OhnoS,HiratsukaT,KondoN,IwataH,BandoH, etal.TheutilityofDHL-HisZnNa,anovelantioxidant,against anticanceragent-inducedalopeciainbreastcancerpatients:

amulticenterphaseIIclinicaltrial.BreastCancerResTreat. 2019;176:625---30.

40.Jimenez JJ, Yunis AA. Protection from 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine-induced alopecia by epidermal growthfactor andfibroblastgrowth factorin theratmodel. CancerRes.1992;52:413---5.

41.HousseinAM. Chemotherapy-induced alopecia: new develop-ments.SouthMedJ.1993;86:489---96.

42.KnockaertM, Greengard P, Meijer L. Pharmacological inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases. Trends Pharmacol Sci.2002;23:417---25.

43.PorterAG,JänickeRU.Emergingrolesofcaspase-3inapoptosis. CellDeathDiffer.1999;6:99---104.

44.Lim YC, Kim H, Lim SM, Kim JS. Genetic analysis of a noval antioxidant multi-target iron chelator, M30 protecting againstchemotherapy-inducedalopeciainmice.BMCCancer. 2019;19:149.

45.TollenaarRA,LiefersGJ,RepelaervanDrielOJ,vandeVelde CJ. Scalp cooling has no place in the prevention of alope-ciainadjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancer.EurJCancer. 1994;30:1448---53.

46.Kadakia KC, Rozell SA, Butala AA, Loprinzi CL. Supportive cryotherapy:areviewfromheadtotoe.JPainSymptom Man-age.2014;47:1100---15.

47.Marks DH, Okhovat JP, Hagigeorges D, Manatis-Lornell AJ, Isakoff SJ, Lacouture ME, et al. The effect of scalp cool-ing on CIA-relatedquality of life in breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;175: 267---76.

48.GrevelmanEG,BreedWP.Preventionofchemotherapy-induced hairlossbyscalpcooling.AnnOncol.2005;16:352---8.

49.ShahVV,Wikramanayake TC, DelCantoGM, vandenHurkC, Wu S, LacoutureME, et al. Scalp hypothermia as a preven-tativemeasure forchemotherapy-inducedalopecia: areview ofcontrolledclinicaltrials.JEurAcadDermatologyVenereol. 2018;32:720---34.

50.Komen MM, Smorenburg CH, van den Hurk CJG, Nortier JWR.Factorsinfluencingtheeffectivenessofscalpcoolingin thepreventionofchemotherapy-inducedalopecia.Oncologist. 2013;18:885---91.

51.GregoryRP,CookeT,MiddletonJ,BuchananRB,WilliamsCJ. Preventionofdoxorubicin-inducedalopeciabyscalp hypother-mia: relation to degree of cooling.Br MedJ (Clin Res Ed). 1982;284:1674.

52.KomenMMC,SmorenburgCH,NortierJWR,vanderPloegT,van denHurkCJG, vanderHoevenJJM.Results ofscalp cooling duringanthracyclinecontainingchemotherapydependonscalp skintemperature.Breast.2016;30:105---10.

53.vandenHurkCJ,BreedWP,NortierJW.Shortpost-infusionscalp coolingtimeinthepreventionofdocetaxel-inducedalopecia. SupportCareCancer.2012;20:3255---60.

54.KomenMM,BreedWP,SmorenburgCH,vanderPloegT,Goey SH, vander Hoeven JJ, et al. Results of 20- versus 45-min post-infusionscalpcoolingtimeinthepreventionof docetaxel-inducedalopecia.SupportCareCancer.2016;24:2735---41.

55.KomenMMC,vandenHurkCJG,NortierJWR,vanderPloegT, NieboerP,vanderHoevenJJM,etal.Prolongingthedurationof post-infusionscalpcoolinginthepreventionof anthracycline-inducedalopecia: a randomisedtrialin patientswithbreast cancertreatedwithadjuvantchemotherapy.SupportCare Can-cer.2019;27:1919---25.

56.ctep.cancer.gov. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). Available from: https://ctep.cancer.gov/ protocolDevelopment/electronicapplications/ctc.htm#ctc50

[cited25.08.19].

57.Rubio-Gonzalez B, Juhász M, Fortman J, Mesinkovska NA. Pathogenesis and treatment options for

(7)

chemotherapy-induced alopecia: a systematic review. Int J Dermatol. 2018;57:1417---24.

58.Friedrichs K, Carstensen MH.Successful reduction of alope-ciainducedbyanthracyclineandtaxane containingadjuvant chemotherapyinbreastcancer---clinicalevaluationof sensor-controlledscalpcooling.Springerplus.2014;3:500.

59.ChristodoulouC,TsakalosG,GalaniE,SkarlosDV.Scalp metas-tases and scalp cooling for chemotherapy-induced alopecia prevention.AnnOncol.2006;17:350.

60.vandenHurkCJ,vandePoll-FranseLV,BreedWP,CoeberghJW, NortierJW.Scalpcoolingtopreventalopeciaafter chemother-apy can be considered safe in patients with breast cancer. Breast.2013;22:1001---4.

61.LemieuxJ,AmireaultC,ProvencherL,MaunsellE.Incidenceof scalpmetastasesinbreastcancer:aretrospectivecohortstudy inwomenwhowereofferedscalpcooling.BreastCancerRes Treat.2009;118:547---52.

62.Rugo HS, Melin SA, Voigt J. Scalp cooling with adju-vant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer and the riskofscalpmetastases:systematicreviewandmeta-analysis. BreastCancerResTreat.2017;163:199---205.

63.SatterwhiteB,ZimmS.Theuseofscalphypothermiainthe pre-ventionofdoxorubicin-inducedhairloss.Cancer.1984;54:34---7.

64.WitmanG, CadmanE,ChenM.Misuseofscalphypothermia. CancerTreatRep.1981;65:507---8.

65.Forsberg SA.Scalp cooling therapyand cytotoxic treatment. Lancet.2001;357:1134.

66.RossM,Fischer-CartlidgeE.Scalpcooling:aliteraturereview ofefficacy,safety,andtolerabilityforchemotherapy-induced alopecia.ClinJOncolNurs.2017;21:226---33.

67.ChanA,BauwensA,PontreS,JacksonS,McgloneF,Ernenwein T,etal.Efficacyofscalpcoolinginreducingalopeciainearly breastcancerpatientsreceivingcontemporarychemotherapy regimens.Breast.2018;41:127---32.

68.BelumVR,deBarrosSilvaG,LaloniMT,CiccoliniK,GoldfarbSB, NortonL,etal.Coldthermalinjuryfromcoldcapsusedforthe preventionofchemotherapy-inducedalopecia.BreastCancer ResTreat.2016;157:395---400.

69.VanDenHurkCJ,MolsF,VingerhoetsAJ,BreedWP.Impactof alopeciaandscalpcoolingonthewell-beingofbreastcancer patients.Psychooncology.2010;19:701---9.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

A facilidade para a operação e manutenção de tais instalações, considerando as fases de desenvolvimento da criança, bem como os exercícios e práticas necessárias para

The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) has been presented as a valid measure to assess psychological distress levels in population surveys but

uma possível desorganização da equipa contrária para receber uma bola mais em profundidade. Sendo assim, foi instruído na equipa algumas dinâmicas para pôr em prática

Este artigo examina as páginas de Facebook dos candidatos à Prefeitura de Curitiba no primeiro turno da eleição de 2016, com o objetivo de avaliar as principais formas de uso de

Protocolo 1: maceração direto no tampão CTAB (Dodecil Sulfato de Sódio) 2%; Protocolo 2: maceração direto no tampão SDS (Brometo de Cetiltrimetilamônio) 20%; Protocolo

transcendental realizado” (S CHLEGEL 1963:XVIII, 350 [V 359]), ou seja, a tentativa de ligação do ideal e do real, que para Schlegel e Novalis é sempre paradoxal: “A mais

Durante este período, a história das três maiores economias da América Latina: Argentina, México e Brasil apresentaram muitas características semelhantes, tais

Apenas os valores obtidos pela câmera para a velocidade da bolha, que apresentaram uma leve tendência de diminuição na dispersão dos resultados com o aumento da pressão,