Anais
Brasileiros
de
Dermatologia
www.anaisdedermatologia.org.br
REVIEW
Scalp
cooling
to
prevent
chemotherapy-induced
alopecia
夽,夽夽
Giselle
de
Barros
Silva
a,∗,
Kathryn
Ciccolini
b,
Aline
Donati
c,
Corina
van
den
Hurk
daCenterofOncology,HospitalAlemãoOswaldoCruz,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil
bDepartmentofHematology/Oncology,MountSinaiHospital,NewYork,NY,UnitedStatesofAmerica cDepartmentofDermatology,HospitaldoServidorPúblicoMunicipaldeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil dR&DDepartment,NetherlandsComprehensiveCancerOrganisation,Utrecht,TheNetherlands
Received29August2019;accepted20March2020 Availableonline16June2020
KEYWORDS Alopecia; Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; Cooling; Drugtherapy; Preventionand mitigation
Abstract Chemotherapy-inducedalopeciacausesanimportantimpactoncancerpatientsand itsriskofpersistenceiscurrentlyaconsiderableissueincancersurvivors.Ofthevarious inter-ventions proposed for the prevention ofchemotherapy-induced alopecia, scalp cooling has emergedasaneffective andsafe strategy.Thispaperaimstoprovideanoverviewonscalp coolingandchemotherapy-inducedalopeciaprevention.
©2020SociedadeBrasileira deDermatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEspa˜na,S.L.U.Thisisan openaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
夽 Howtocitethisarticle:SilvaGB,CiccoliniK,DonatiA,HurkC.
Scalpcoolingtopreventchemotherapy-inducedalopecia.AnBras Dermatol.2020;95:631---7.
夽夽Studyconducted atthe HospitalAlemãoOswaldoCruz, São
Paulo,SP,Brazil.
∗Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:gisellebarros@yahoo.com.br(G.B.Silva).
Introduction
Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) is one of the most reportedunpredictableadverseevents(AEs)experiencedby cancerpatientsandsurvivors,1withanoverallincidenceof
65%.2Ithasbeenreportedasthemostdisturbingcondition
ofcancertreatmentbymost(88%)womenreceiving periop-erativechemotherapy.1Patientsmaydeclinelife-prolonging
chemotherapy to avoid developing alopecia.1,3,4
Further-more,CIAstrongly influences howothersperceive cancer patients,thevisibilityofdisease,socialrelationships,and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2020.03.005
0365-0596/©2020SociedadeBrasileiradeDermatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEspa˜na,S.L.U.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
sexuality.1,3,5Inadditiontophysicalandpsychosocial
impair-ment, CIA can also be financially detrimental due to expensivecosmeticproductssuchaswigsandhairregrowth treatments.6
ManystrategieshavebeentestedtominimizeCIA,among whichscalpcoolinghasproventobethemosteffective.7,8
Since recent publications on its efficacy and safety as a preventivemethodagainstCIA,7---9 thisprocedurehasbeen
increasinglyemployedinBrazilandworldwide.TheNational Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice GuidelinesinOncologyhaverecentlyaddeda recommenda-tionofscalpcoolingtreatmentforCIAprevention(category 2A)forbreastcancerpatients.10
The presentarticle aimstoprovidean overviewof CIA andscalpcoolingsothatdermatologistscanbecome famil-iarwiththesetopics,whichhavebecomemorecommonin clinicalpractice.
Understanding
chemotherapy-induced
alopecia
Most chemotherapeutic agents are cytotoxic drugs that affectproliferatingcancercells.Othernormally proliferat-ingcells, e.g.,thehair matrix cells(in anagenphase90% of the time) and bone marrow, are unintentional targets of chemotherapy. Patientsreceiving --- among other drugs --- anthracyclines(i.e.,doxorubicinandepirubicin),taxanes (i.e.,docetaxelandpaclitaxel),oretoposidedevelop alope-cia,oftenreferredtoasanageneffluvium(Fig.1).8,11---14
Clinically,alopeciaismostnoticeableonthescalp,which hasthehighestdensity ofterminalhairfolliclesinanagen phase,andtypicallyappearswithindaystoweeksafter ini-tiationoftreatmentwithmanychemotherapeuticagents.14
Theinterruptionofhairfolliclemitoticactivitycontributes tothefragilityoftheproximalportionofthehairshaft,and consequentlybreakagewithinthehaircanal.2After
cessa-tionofchemotherapy,inmostcases,regrowthbeginswithin 1---3months;however, itcanpresent withchangesin tex-ture,color,and/orthickness.13---15 Dependingonthedegree
Figure 1 Chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Breast cancer patientattheendofthetreatmentwithfourcyclesof doxoru-bicinandcyclophosphamide (PhotocourtesyofLíviaNicoletti Ariano).
ofhair-folliclestem-celldamage,regrowthgenerallytakes uptosixmonthsaftercessationofchemotherapy.8,14
The trichoscopic findingsof CIA show thechanges suf-fered by thehair shaftthroughout chemotherapy, varying accordingtothephaseofthetreatment.Brokenhairs,black dots,flamehairs,andPohl-Pinkusconstrictionsmaybeseen inthe firstmonthsofchemotherapy. Additionally, regrow-ing hairs,rare terminal hairs,and circlehairs areusually observedattheendofthetreatment(Fig.2).16
Consideringthetypeofthechemotherapeuticagent,the incidenceofCIAmayrangefrom60%to100%with topoiso-meraseinhibitors(i.e.,irinotecan,etoposide,doxorubicin), >80% with taxanes (i.e., docetaxel, paclitaxel), and >60% withalkylatingagents(i.e.;cyclophosphamide,ifosfamide), whereas antimetabolites (i.e.; 5FU, methotrexate, gemc-itabine)presentalowerrisk.17,18
Besidesthechemotherapydrugtype,commonrisk fac-tors for CIA include dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and combination regimens with various concurrent cytotoxic agents.14 The degree of hair loss can also varywith age,
comorbidities,andnutritional/hormonalstatus.14
Persistentchemotherapy-inducedalopecia:an increasingconcern
In some instances,hair loss may bepersistent (persistent chemotherapy-inducedalopecia,PCIA),whichisdefinedas theabsenceorsuboptimalhairgrowthpersistingbeyondsix monthsaftercessationofchemotherapy.13Theincidenceof
PCIAcanrangefrom14%inchildhoodcancersurvivorsto30% inbreastcancersurvivors.19Inthe1990s,thefirstreported
casesof PCIAoccurredafterhigh-dosechemotherapy reg-imens (busulfan and cyclophosphamide) received before bonemarrowtransplantation.20Radiationandtaxane-based
chemotherapyregimenshavealsobeen involvedinPCIA.21
In a recent cohort ofAsian breastcancer patients,about 42% had PCIA afterthree yearsof chemotherapy comple-tion,withhigherriskusingtaxanes,whichappeartobemore cytotoxicto hair-follicle stem cells.15 Relevant impacton
self-imagewasreportedinthosepatients.15,22
Figure2 Trichoscopyofchemotherapy-inducedalopecia. Tri-choscopicfindingsintheregionofthevertexofthescalpofthe patientinfig.1:multipleblackdots,circularhair,andgrowing hair.Rareterminalhairs,someshowingpointsofconstriction (Pohl-Pinkus)intheirextension,referringtopreviouscyclesof chemotherapy(PhotocourtesyofLíviaNicolettiAriano).
Strategiesforchemotherapy-inducedalopecia prevention
Considering the impactof CIA in cancer patients, several medications and procedures have been tested to reduce or preventCIA. A large numberof studies have used ani-mal models, with variable and not yet clinically proven results.23---28 Afewproductshavebeentestedinhumansin
small studies with positive results, but more evidence is lacking, exceptforscalpcooling, whosesafetyand effec-tiveness have been frequently described in recent years (Table1).Sometopicals,suchasminoxidilorbimatoprost, havebeen showneffectivein stimulationofhairregrowth afterchemotherapy,withnopreventiveeffectonCIA.29---44
Sincethe1970s,avarietyofscalpcoolingtechniques ---such as cryogel bags, cold caps, and cooling machines ---havebeen usedfor CIAprevention.12,25---28 Coldcaps(e.g.,
Elasto-gel,Penguin)andelectroniccoolingmachines(e.g., Paxman,Dignitana)arethemostusedworldwide.
InBrazil,threedeviceshaveapprovalfromtheBrazilian Health Regulatory Agency(Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária[ANVISA])forscalpcoolingduringchemotherapy: Elasto-gel,PaxmanandCapelli.Thelatterisadevicemade inBrazil,usingcoldair,whosestudiesregardingitsefficacy areabouttobepublished.
Workingmechanism
The beneficial effects of scalp cooling are caused by vasoconstriction in the scalp skin, decreased intrafollicu-larmetabolic rate,anddecreasedfollicular drugsuptake, whichintheoryreducefollicularexposuretoharmful cyto-toxiceffectsattheirpeakplasmaconcentrations.3,11,45---48 Efficacy
Theefficacyofscalpcoolingwasrecentlyconfirmedby Nan-giaetal.inarandomized-controlledtrialwithearly-stage breast cancer patients that received at least four cycles of taxane- and/or anthracycline-based chemotherapy, in which the experimental group used a Paxman device for scalp cooling,started 30min prior chemotherapy infusion
and maintained throughout infusion and for 90min after infusion.Inthescalpcoolinggroup,successwasreportedin 50.5%ofwomen(50.5%;95%CI40.7---60.4%)comparedto0% inthecontrolgroup(0%;95%CI0---7.6%).9Rugoetal.,ina
recentsystematicreviewandmeta-analysiswhichincluded tenrandomizedcontrolledtrials(twowithaPaxmandevice and the others with cryogel caps or bag), endorsed the positiveeffectof scalpcooling inreducingCIAinpatients withsolidtumors (RR=0.54; 95%CI 0.46---0.63; I2¼=11%;
p<0.00001).7Shahetal.analyzedcontrolledand
random-izedclinical trials (CCTand RCT, respectively) evaluating scalp hypothermia for CIA prevention, with reduction in theincidence of CIA by 2.7 (in CCT) to3.9 fold (in RCT) in scalp-cooled patients. There were 18 trials included in the review, with different scalp cooling techniques ---rangingfromolderandlesscomplexcoolingcapstodigitally controlledmachines.49ScalpcoolingmachinesfromPaxman
andDignitana have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration(FDA),andhavebeenincorporatedintothe NCCNguidelinesforbreastcancerpatients.
Pre-coolingtimeandpost-infusioncoolingtime
Theduration ofscalp coolingappears tobean influential factor in hair preservation.50 Cooling is generally started
30minbeforeinfusion(pre-coolingtime[PCT])sothatthe scalpskin temperaturehasreacheditslowestpeakatthe momentthedrugentershairfollicles. Intradermalor sub-cutaneousscalptemperatureduringscalpcoolingtendsto beon average around 22◦C,the target temperature sug-gestedbyGregoryetal.51However,lowscalptemperature
rangemayvaryfromone patienttoanother for unknown reasons.Itmaybeduetodifferencesintheinsulatingaction ofscalpstructures(hair,dermis,andsubcutaneoustissue), heatdissipation,skullanatomy,andreflexthermalreaction tovasoconstriction.Those withintradermal scalp temper-aturelowerthan18◦Caremorelikelytohave betterhair protectionwithscalpcooling.49,52
The cooling procedure is maintained during the chemotherapyinfusion andkeptforaperiodoftimeafter itsend(post-infusioncoolingtime[PICT]),dependingonthe chemotherapyregimen.
Table1 Preventivestrategiesforchemotherapy-inducedalopecia(CIA)inanimalmodelsandinhumantrials Studiedinanimalmodels Studiedinhumantrials:not
effective
Studiedinhumantrials:effective
Anti-doxorubicin29 Topicalminoxidil23 AS101a30
Topicalepinephrineandnorepinephrine31 Parathyroidhormonereceptor (PPR)ligands32
Scalpcooling9,33,34 Topicaln-acetylcysteine35 Scalptourniquet36
Topicalantioxidants(resveratrol,aminothiol)31 Topicalcalcitriol37 TopicalcyclosporineA38 DHL-HisZnNA39 Immunomodulators(Il-1,40imuvert41)
AcidFGF,EGF40 CDK2inhibitors42 Caspase-3inhibitors43
Multi-targetironchelatorM3044
Some studies involving cold caps reported they were unabletomaintainlow temperaturesfor theentire dura-tionoftheplannedtreatmenttime.Ithas,however,been suggested that the caps shouldbe changed three tofour times,or every25min, duringthe chemotherapy infusion andPICT,toensureastabletemperature.48However,
cool-ingmachines with thermostatmanagement keep a stable temperatureandrequirefewernursinginterventions.18
To date, the precise durationof thePICT is yet tobe estimated. Ideally, the PICT should consider the pharma-cokinetics of exposure to the cytotoxic agent and/or its activemetabolites, whichcorrespondtopeakplasma con-centrations,drug half-life, and potential interactions.28,50
Consideringpatientstreatedwithdocetaxelregimens,PICTs of90’and45’hadsimilarresultspreventinghairloss(79%
vs.95% of patientswith success,respectively; p=0.04).53
Komenetal.studiedPICTsof20’and45’,alsoinpatients taking docetaxel, with comparable rates of hair reten-tion (73% vs. 79% of patients with success, respectively;
p=0.5).54Inanthracyclineregimens,PICTsof90’orgreater
areoftenused;however,prolongingPICTshowedno reduc-tionin theneed for scalp coverage.55 Further studies are
needed to determine the most effective PICT for each chemotherapyregimen.
Hairlossassessmentandscalpcoolingresults
The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) is largely used in oncology to systematize the adverseeventsofcancertreatment.AccordingtotheCTCAE v.5.0,alopeciagrade1correspondstolessthan50%ofhair loss,notrequiringtheuseofawigoraheadcover;in alope-ciagrade2,hairlossismorethan50%,andawigorascarf isnecessary.56 Amodified Dean’sscale forhair lossis also
usedtoquantifytheseverityofCIA(grade0:nohairloss; grade1:0to≤25%hairloss;grade2:>25%to≤50%hairloss; grade3:>50to≤75%hairloss;grade4:>75%hairloss).In theliterature,scalpcoolingisgenerallyconsidered success-fulwhenalopeciaislessthan50%(CTCAEv.5.0grade0or 1;modifiedDean’sscalegrade0.1or2).9,34,57
Factorsinfluencingscalpcoolingsuccess
The success of scalp cooling may vary according to the chemotherapeutic drug, dose, and combination, and also depends on the scalp temperature achieved, duration of cooling,andproper fitting of thecap.33,48,58 In the
litera-ture,thereisvariabilityinthesuccessratesofscalpcooling forthesamechemotherapyregimenanddose.Consideration shouldbegiventothestudydesign,population character-istics, applied technique, PCT/PICT, hair loss assessment scale,andtheselectedsuccesscriteria.InaDutchregistry studywith1411patients(scalpcoolingperformedwith Pax-mandevices),regimenswithlow-dosedocetaxel(75mg/m2)
andpaclitaxel (70---90mg/m2)showedbetter ratesof
suc-cesswithscalpcooling(94%and81%,respectively)whereas amongpatientstakinganthracyclineandcyclophosphamide, 39%weresuccessful.33Rugoetal.reportedsuccessin66.3%
of patientsreceiving taxanes withscalp coolingwith Dig-nitanadevices.34 Nangiaet al.reportedthat scalp-cooled
patientsusingPaxmandevicesundertaxane-basedregimens
aremorelikelytohavehigherratesofhairpreservation(59% success;paclitaxelusedweeklyismoreeffectivethan doc-etaxel used every three weeks) than anthracycline-based chemotherapy(16%success).9
Scalpcoolingandcutaneousscalpskinmetastases
Since the first reports of scalp cooling studies, safety concerns have been raised regarding the possibility that chemotherapy doesnotsufficientlytreat pre-existing sub-clinicalscalpskinmetastases.59Theincidenceofmetastases
in scalp-cooled breast cancer patients appears to be less than1.1%,whichiswithintherates(0.03---3%)reportedin breastcancerpatientstreatedwithoutscalpcooling.46,60In
astudyinvolving442patientsusingacoldcap,theoverall incidenceofscalpskinmetastaseswas0.45%(2/442), occur-ringin0.88%(2/227)ofbreastcancerpatients.59Similarlow
ratesofscalpskinmetastases(7/640,1.1%)werealsonoted inaretrospectivecohortstudyofwomenwithbreast can-cer, wherein the majority (86.4%) had been offeredscalp coolingatsomepointduringtheirtreatment.Itis notewor-thy that in neithercase didscalpmetastases manifest as thefirstisolatedsiteofrecurrence---womenwhohadahigh riskofbreastcancerrecurrence,suchasthoseinstageIII, weremorelikelytohavemetastasesinthescalp,inaddition tootherorgans.61Althoughadditionalresearchwithlonger
follow-up is needed to establish a clear association, data availableindicatethatthereis noincreasedriskofapoor outcomewithscalpcoolinginbreastcancerpatients.7,62
However, regression of scalp skin metastases, despite scalpcooling,hasalsobeenreported(twocases),suggesting thatthedistributionofchemotherapyatthesesitesisnot completely prevented.59,63 Nevertheless, in patients with
bloodcancerspresentingwithcancercellsalloverthebody (e.g. leukemia,lymphoma), scalpcooling is currently not recommended.46,64Witmanetal.reportedacaseofmycosis
fungoidesthatdisappeared withconsolidation chemother-apybutrecurredonthescalp.64Anotherinstanceofrelapse
wasdescribedina17-year-oldboywhoseacutemyeloblastic leukemiamanifestedwithseveralsubcutaneous scalp nod-ules but withnoevidenceof hematologicalrelapse seven yearsaftertheuseofscalpcoolingduringhistwocourses ofchemotherapy.65
Adverseeventsandcontraindicationsforscalp cooling
Scalpcoolinghasbeenshowntobeawell-tolerated support-ivecare.49,66 The mostcommonly reportedAEswithscalp
coolingarelow-gradeandincludeheadaches,nausea, dizzi-ness,complaintsofcoldness,andclaustrophobia.Frostbite wasreportedinafewcaseswithcoldcaps,whichare usu-allybelow−25◦Cbeforebeingappliedtothepatient’shead; nonehasbeenreportedwithcoolingmachines.9,33,50,58,67,68
Hairlessareas(e.g.,forehead,ears,scalpalopecia)should beprotectedduringscalpcooling,usingasimplebandage.
Scalp cooling is not indicated for patients with cold agglutinin disease, cryoglobulinemia, cryofibrinogenemia, orcoldsensitivity.50Itisnotrecommendedforpatientswith
hematologic tumors,whoareat higherrisk for cutaneous metastases.
Scalpcoolingandimpactonqualityoflifeand well-being
Althoughtheuse ofscalpcoolinghasbecomeincreasingly widespreadtopreventCIA,studieshaveshowninconsistent evidenceofimprovementinpatients’qualityoflife(QoL), reportedlyduetononspecificQoLassessments(most stud-iesusedEORTCQLQ-C30and-BR23),differencesinmethods andoutcomesreportingQoLandoverallcostandfinancial burdenofscalpcooling.47Whenscalpcoolingdoesnotwork
asexpected,theimpactonQoLisworsewhencomparedto controls,i.e.,patientsnotusingscalpcooling.33Therefore,
anappropriateQoLinstrumentisstillsought.Inoneofthe firstmulti-centeredprospectivestudiesdesignedto inves-tigatethe impactonwell-being in breastcancer patients receivingscalp cooling(98/266), 52% of thepatients who experienced effective scalp cooling reportedbetter well-being when compared to patients in whom this was not achieved.69
Final
considerations
Scalpcooling is an approved and generallywell-tolerated option to prevent CIA and can minimize the burden of cancer treatment and potential impairments in patients’ health-relatedQoLandpsychosocialwell-being.Whilethe type of scalp cooling method might not be decisive, maintaining stable low scalp skin temperatures is cru-cial.Patientsreceivinganthracycline-basedregimenshave lower rates of hair retention compared to taxane-based chemotherapies.Patientswithhematologicalmalignancies and cold-precipitated diseases should not undergo scalp-coolingtherapy.Scalpcoolingdoesnotappeartoincrease theriskofcutaneousscalpmetastasesinearly-stagebreast cancerpatients,nordoes itappeartocompromisecancer outcome,althoughlong-termfollow-upstudiesareneeded.
Financial
support
Nonedeclared.
Authors’
contributions
Giselle de Barros Silva: Approval of final version of the manuscript; conception and planning of the study; draft-ingandeditingofthemanuscript;collection,analysis,and interpretationofdata;participationinstudydesign;critical reviewoftheliterature;criticalreviewofthemanuscript.
KathrynCiccoliniHernandez:Approvaloffinalversionof themanuscript;draftingandeditingofthemanuscript; par-ticipationinstudydesign;criticalreviewofthemanuscript. AlineDonati:Approvaloffinalversionofthemanuscript; criticalreviewofthemanuscript.
Corina van den Hurk: Approval of final version of the manuscript;criticalreviewofthemanuscript.
Conflicts
of
interest
Nonedeclared.
References
1.KiebertGM,HannekeJ,deHaesCJ,KievitJ,vandeVC.Effect ofperi-operativechemotherapyonthequalityoflifeofpatients withearlybreastcancer.EurJCancer.1990;26:1038---42.
2.TrüebRM.Chemotherapy-inducedalopecia.CurrOpinSupport PalliatCare.2010;4:281---4.
3.ProtièreC,EvansK,CamerloJ,d’IngradoMP,Macquart-Moulin G,ViensP,etal.Efficacyandtoleranceofascalp-coolingsystem forpreventionofhairlossandtheexperienceofbreast can-cerpatientstreatedbyadjuvantchemotherapy.SupportCare Cancer.2002;10:529---37.
4.ParkerR.Theeffectivenessofscalphypothermiain prevent-ing cyclophosphamide-inducedalopecia. Oncol NursyForum. 1987;14:49---53.
5.Auvinen PK,MähönenUA, SoininenKM,PaananenPK, Ranta-Koponen PH, Saavalainen IE, et al. The effectiveness of a scalpcoolingcapinpreventingchemotherapy-induced alope-cia.Tumori.2010;96:271---5.
6.MolsF,VanDenHurkCJ,VingerhoetsAJ,BreedWPM.Scalp cool-ingtopreventchemotherapy-inducedhairloss:practicaland clinicalconsiderations.SupportCareCancer.2009;17:181---9.
7.Rugo HS, Voigt J. Scalp hypothermia for preventing alope-cia during chemotherapy. a systematic review and meta-analysis ofrandomized controlled trials.Clin BreastCancer. 2018;18:19---28.
8.Shin H, Jo SJ, Kim DH, Kwon O, Myung SK. Efficacy of interventionsforpreventionofchemotherapy-induced alope-cia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E442---54.
9.NangiaJ,WangT,OsborneC,NiravathP,OtteK,PapishS,etal. Effectofascalpcoolingdeviceonalopeciainwomenundergoing chemotherapyforbreastcancer:theSCALPrandomizedclinical trial.JAMA.2017;317:596---605.
10.nccn.org. National Comprehensive Cancer Network; c2019. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/ physiciangls/pdf/breastblocks.pdf[cited20.08.19].
11.KatsimbriP,BamiasA,PavlidisN.Preventionof chemotherapy-inducedalopeciausinganeffectivescalpcoolingsystem.EurJ Cancer.2000;36:766---71.
12.RidderheimM,BjurbergM,GustavssonA.Scalphypothermiato preventchemotherapy-inducedalopeciaiseffectiveandsafe: apilotstudyofanewdigitizedscalp-coolingsystemusedin74 patients.SupportCareCancer.2003;11:371---7.
13.ChonSY,ChampionRW,GeddesER,RashidRM. Chemotherapy-inducedalopecia.JAmAcadDermatol.2012;67:e37---47.
14.PausR,HaslamIS,SharovAA,BotchkarevVA.Pathobiologyof chemotherapy-inducedhairloss.LancetOncol.2013;14:e50---9.
15.KangD,KimI,ChoiEK,ImYH,ParkYH,AhnJS,etal.Permanent chemotherapy-inducedalopeciainpatientswithbreastcancer: a3-yearprospectivecohortstudy.Oncologist.2019;24:414---20.
16.Rossi A, CaterinaFortuna M,Caro G, Cardone M,Garelli V, GrassiS,etal.Monitoringchemotherapy-inducedalopeciawith trichoscopy.JCosmetDermatol.2019;18:575---80.
17.Rossi A, Fortuna MC, Caro G, Pranteda G, Garelli V, Pom-pili U, et al. Chemotherapy-induced alopecia management: clinicalexperienceandpracticaladvice.JCosmetDermatol. 2017;16:537---41.
18.Dunnill CJ, Al-TameemiW, CollettA, HaslamIS, Georgopou-los NT. A clinical and biological guide for understanding chemotherapy-inducedalopeciaanditsprevention.Oncologist. 2018;23:84---96.
19.Freites-MartinezA,ShapiroJ,GoldfarbS,Nangia J,Jimenez JJ,PausR,etal.Hairdisordersincancerpatients.JAmAcad Dermatol.2019;80:1179---96.
20.Yeager CE, Olsen EA. Treatment of chemotherapy-induced alopecia.DermatolTher.2011;24:432---42.
21.Haider M, Hamadah I, Almutawa A. Radiation- and chemotherapy-induced permanent alopecia: case series. JCutanMedSurg.2013;17:55---61.
22.Freites-MartinezA,ChanD,SibaudV,ShapiroJ,FabbrociniG, TostiA,etal.Assessmentofqualityoflifeandtreatment out-comesofpatientswithpersistentpostchemotherapyalopecia. JAMADermatol.2019;155:724---8.
23.DuvicM,LemakNA,ValeroV,HymesSR,FarmerKL,Hortobagyi GN, etal. Arandomizedtrialofminoxidil in chemotherapy-inducedalopecia.JAmAcadDermatol.1996;35:74---8.
24.WirtaD,BaumannL,BruceS,AhluwaliaG,WengE,DanielsS. Safetyandefficacyofbimatoprostforeyelashgrowthin.JClin AesthetDermatol.2015;8:11---20.
25.Edelstyn GA,MacDonald M,MacRae KD.Doxorubicin-induced hair lossand possiblemodification byscalp cooling.Lancet. 1977;2:253---4.
26.DeanJC,GriffithKS,CetasTC, MackelCL,JonesSE,Salmon SE.Scalphypothermia:acomparisonoficepacksandtheKold Kapinthepreventionofdoxorubicin-inducedalopecia.JClin Oncol.1983;1:33---7.
27.PeckHJ,MitchellH,StewartAL.Evaluatingtheefficacyofscalp coolingusingthePenguincoldcapsystemtoreducealopecia inpatientsundergoingchemotherapyforbreastcancer.EurJ OncolNurs.2000;4:246---8.
28.MasseyCS.Amulticentrestudytodeterminetheefficacyand patientacceptability ofthePaxman ScalpCoolerto prevent hairlossinpatientsreceivingchemotherapy.EurJOncolNurs. 2004;8:121---30.
29.BalsariAL,MorelliD,MénardS,VeronesiU,ColnaghiMI. Protec-tionagainstdoxorubicin-inducedalopeciainratsby liposome-entrappedmonoclonalantibodies.FASEBJ.1994;8:226---30.
30.SredniB, XuRH, AlbeckM,GafterU, GalR, Shani A,et al. The protective role of the immunomodulator AS101 against chemotherapy-inducedalopeciastudiesonhumanandanimal models.IntJCancer.1996;65:97---103.
31.SorefCM,FahlWE.Anewstrategytopreventchemotherapyand radiotherapy-inducedalopeciausingtopicallyapplied vasocon-strictor.IntJCancer.2015;136:195---203.
32.Skrok A, Bednarczuk T, Skwarek A, Popow M, Rudnicka L, OlszewskaM.Theeffectofparathyroidhormonesonhairfollicle physiology: implications for treatment of chemotherapy-inducedalopecia.SkiPharmacolPhysiol.2015;28:213---25.
33.vandenHurkCJ,PeerboomsM,vandePoll-FranseLV,Nortier JW, Coebergh JW, Breed WP. Scalp cooling for hair preser-vation and associated characteristics in 1411 chemotherapy patients --- results ofthe Dutch Scalp Cooling Registry. Acta Oncol.2012;51:497---504.
34.Rugo HS, Klein P, Melin SA, Hurvitz SA, Melisko ME, Moore A, et al. Associationbetween useof a scalp cooling device and alopecia after chemotherapy for breast cancer. JAMA. 2017;317:606---14.
35.Jiménez JJ, Huang HS, Yunis AA. Treatment
with ImuVert/N-acetylcysteine protects rats from cyclophosphamide/cytarabine-induced alopecia. Cancer Invest.1992;10:271---6.
36.Maxwell MB. Scalp tourniquets for chemotherapy-induced alopecia.AmJNurs.1980;80:900---3.
37.PausR,SchilliMB,HandjiskiB,MenradA,HenzBM,PlonkaP. Topicalcalcitriolenhancesnormalhairregrowthbutdoesnot preventchemotherapy-inducedalopeciainmice.CancerRes. 1996;56:4438---43.
38.Hussein A, Stuart A, Peters WP. Protection against chemotherapy-induced alopecia by cyclosporin a in the newbornratanimalmodel.Dermatology.1995;190:192---6.
39.Sagawa N,OhnoS,HiratsukaT,KondoN,IwataH,BandoH, etal.TheutilityofDHL-HisZnNa,anovelantioxidant,against anticanceragent-inducedalopeciainbreastcancerpatients:
amulticenterphaseIIclinicaltrial.BreastCancerResTreat. 2019;176:625---30.
40.Jimenez JJ, Yunis AA. Protection from 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine-induced alopecia by epidermal growthfactor andfibroblastgrowth factorin theratmodel. CancerRes.1992;52:413---5.
41.HousseinAM. Chemotherapy-induced alopecia: new develop-ments.SouthMedJ.1993;86:489---96.
42.KnockaertM, Greengard P, Meijer L. Pharmacological inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases. Trends Pharmacol Sci.2002;23:417---25.
43.PorterAG,JänickeRU.Emergingrolesofcaspase-3inapoptosis. CellDeathDiffer.1999;6:99---104.
44.Lim YC, Kim H, Lim SM, Kim JS. Genetic analysis of a noval antioxidant multi-target iron chelator, M30 protecting againstchemotherapy-inducedalopeciainmice.BMCCancer. 2019;19:149.
45.TollenaarRA,LiefersGJ,RepelaervanDrielOJ,vandeVelde CJ. Scalp cooling has no place in the prevention of alope-ciainadjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancer.EurJCancer. 1994;30:1448---53.
46.Kadakia KC, Rozell SA, Butala AA, Loprinzi CL. Supportive cryotherapy:areviewfromheadtotoe.JPainSymptom Man-age.2014;47:1100---15.
47.Marks DH, Okhovat JP, Hagigeorges D, Manatis-Lornell AJ, Isakoff SJ, Lacouture ME, et al. The effect of scalp cool-ing on CIA-relatedquality of life in breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;175: 267---76.
48.GrevelmanEG,BreedWP.Preventionofchemotherapy-induced hairlossbyscalpcooling.AnnOncol.2005;16:352---8.
49.ShahVV,Wikramanayake TC, DelCantoGM, vandenHurkC, Wu S, LacoutureME, et al. Scalp hypothermia as a preven-tativemeasure forchemotherapy-inducedalopecia: areview ofcontrolledclinicaltrials.JEurAcadDermatologyVenereol. 2018;32:720---34.
50.Komen MM, Smorenburg CH, van den Hurk CJG, Nortier JWR.Factorsinfluencingtheeffectivenessofscalpcoolingin thepreventionofchemotherapy-inducedalopecia.Oncologist. 2013;18:885---91.
51.GregoryRP,CookeT,MiddletonJ,BuchananRB,WilliamsCJ. Preventionofdoxorubicin-inducedalopeciabyscalp hypother-mia: relation to degree of cooling.Br MedJ (Clin Res Ed). 1982;284:1674.
52.KomenMMC,SmorenburgCH,NortierJWR,vanderPloegT,van denHurkCJG, vanderHoevenJJM.Results ofscalp cooling duringanthracyclinecontainingchemotherapydependonscalp skintemperature.Breast.2016;30:105---10.
53.vandenHurkCJ,BreedWP,NortierJW.Shortpost-infusionscalp coolingtimeinthepreventionofdocetaxel-inducedalopecia. SupportCareCancer.2012;20:3255---60.
54.KomenMM,BreedWP,SmorenburgCH,vanderPloegT,Goey SH, vander Hoeven JJ, et al. Results of 20- versus 45-min post-infusionscalpcoolingtimeinthepreventionof docetaxel-inducedalopecia.SupportCareCancer.2016;24:2735---41.
55.KomenMMC,vandenHurkCJG,NortierJWR,vanderPloegT, NieboerP,vanderHoevenJJM,etal.Prolongingthedurationof post-infusionscalpcoolinginthepreventionof anthracycline-inducedalopecia: a randomisedtrialin patientswithbreast cancertreatedwithadjuvantchemotherapy.SupportCare Can-cer.2019;27:1919---25.
56.ctep.cancer.gov. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). Available from: https://ctep.cancer.gov/ protocolDevelopment/electronicapplications/ctc.htm#ctc50
[cited25.08.19].
57.Rubio-Gonzalez B, Juhász M, Fortman J, Mesinkovska NA. Pathogenesis and treatment options for
chemotherapy-induced alopecia: a systematic review. Int J Dermatol. 2018;57:1417---24.
58.Friedrichs K, Carstensen MH.Successful reduction of alope-ciainducedbyanthracyclineandtaxane containingadjuvant chemotherapyinbreastcancer---clinicalevaluationof sensor-controlledscalpcooling.Springerplus.2014;3:500.
59.ChristodoulouC,TsakalosG,GalaniE,SkarlosDV.Scalp metas-tases and scalp cooling for chemotherapy-induced alopecia prevention.AnnOncol.2006;17:350.
60.vandenHurkCJ,vandePoll-FranseLV,BreedWP,CoeberghJW, NortierJW.Scalpcoolingtopreventalopeciaafter chemother-apy can be considered safe in patients with breast cancer. Breast.2013;22:1001---4.
61.LemieuxJ,AmireaultC,ProvencherL,MaunsellE.Incidenceof scalpmetastasesinbreastcancer:aretrospectivecohortstudy inwomenwhowereofferedscalpcooling.BreastCancerRes Treat.2009;118:547---52.
62.Rugo HS, Melin SA, Voigt J. Scalp cooling with adju-vant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer and the riskofscalpmetastases:systematicreviewandmeta-analysis. BreastCancerResTreat.2017;163:199---205.
63.SatterwhiteB,ZimmS.Theuseofscalphypothermiainthe pre-ventionofdoxorubicin-inducedhairloss.Cancer.1984;54:34---7.
64.WitmanG, CadmanE,ChenM.Misuseofscalphypothermia. CancerTreatRep.1981;65:507---8.
65.Forsberg SA.Scalp cooling therapyand cytotoxic treatment. Lancet.2001;357:1134.
66.RossM,Fischer-CartlidgeE.Scalpcooling:aliteraturereview ofefficacy,safety,andtolerabilityforchemotherapy-induced alopecia.ClinJOncolNurs.2017;21:226---33.
67.ChanA,BauwensA,PontreS,JacksonS,McgloneF,Ernenwein T,etal.Efficacyofscalpcoolinginreducingalopeciainearly breastcancerpatientsreceivingcontemporarychemotherapy regimens.Breast.2018;41:127---32.
68.BelumVR,deBarrosSilvaG,LaloniMT,CiccoliniK,GoldfarbSB, NortonL,etal.Coldthermalinjuryfromcoldcapsusedforthe preventionofchemotherapy-inducedalopecia.BreastCancer ResTreat.2016;157:395---400.
69.VanDenHurkCJ,MolsF,VingerhoetsAJ,BreedWP.Impactof alopeciaandscalpcoolingonthewell-beingofbreastcancer patients.Psychooncology.2010;19:701---9.