Literature listing
1. Books
1.1. Recent reports and other monographs
OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2007, ISBN: 978-92-64-03788-5. http://www.sourceoecd. org/stiscoreboard.
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Toolkit for Italy, The U.S. Commercial Service, Carrington E., Burr T., Lapini B, September 2007. http://buyusainfo.net/docs/ x_2596576.pdf.
Testimony Before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property-Risk and Enforcement Challenges. Statement of Loren Yager, Director International Affairs and Trade, 2007, Government Accountability Office. http://www.gao. gov/new.items/d08177t.pdf?source=ra.
Examining U.S. Government Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Senate Judiciary Committee, Full Com-mittee, Wednesday, November 7, 2007. http://judiciary. senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=3020.
Biopharmaceutical Products in the U.S. and European Markets, 6th ed. 2007, BioPlan Associates, Inc., 2 vol., 1602 pages. http://www.biopharma.com.
Compendium of patent statistics. Organisation for Eco-nomic Co-operation and Development, 2007. http://www. oecd.org/dataoecd/5/19/37569377.pdf.
Community Innovation Statistics – Fourth Community In-novation Survey and European InIn-novation Scoreboard 2006, European Commission, 2007. http://epp.eurostat. ec.europa.eu/pls/portal/url/page/PGP_MISCELLANEO- US/PGE_DOC_DETAIL?p_product_code=KS-SF-07-116.
1.2. Reviews are available as follows:
From Edison to iPod: Protect your ideas and make money. Frederick Mostert. Dorling Kindersley, 2007. ISBN
9781405319263. Reviewed by Davies I., European
Intellectual Property Review, 2007, 29 (9), 399–400.
Innovate like Edison: The Success System of America’s Greatest Inventor. Michael J. Gelb, Sarah Miller Caldicott, Dutton, 2007. Reviewed by Rosenstein B., USA Today, 2007. http://www.usatoday.com/money/books/2007-10-28-innovate-like-edison_N.htm.
Merchandising Intellectual Property. John N Adams with Julian Hickey. 3rd edn, Tottel Publishing, 2007, £168. Reviewed by Torremans P. European Intellectual Property Review, 2007, 29 (11), 474.
2. Journals
The listing in this issue includes entries found using ScopusTM, Elsevier’s abstract and indexing database which
gives access to 15,000 peer-reviewed titles from more than 4000 international publishers.
2.1. Search techniques, databases and analysis: classification: searcher certification
2.1.1. Search techniques, databases
A new era in chemical information: PubChem, Discovery-Gate, and chemistry central.
Baykoucheva S. Online (Wilton, Connecticut), 2007, 31 (5), 16–20.
Building a sound structure [database design and patents]. Adams M. Patent World, 2007, (196), 15–17.
No easy cure for patent problems. It discusses issues raised at the Information Retrieval Facility Symposium in November 07.
Griffin D. Information World Review, 2007, (December), 13.
Predicting citations to biotechnology patents based on the information from the patent documents.
Lin B.-W., Chen C.-J., Wu H.-L. International Journal
of Technology Management, 2007, 40 (39142),
87–100.
The Introduction of IPC Reform codes and their impact on DWPI.
STNews European Edition, 2007, 23 (2), 20–24.
www.elsevier.com/locate/worpatin
2.1.2. Analysis and statistics
A patent-based cross impact analysis for quantitative esti-mation of technological impact: The case of inforesti-mation and communication technology.
Choi C., Kim S., Park Y. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2007, 74 (8), 1296–1314.
Issued US patents, patent-related global academic and media publications, and the US market indices are inter-correlated, with varying growth patterns.
Daizadeh I. Scientometrics, 2007, 73 (1), 29–36.
Knowledge spillovers across Europe: Evidence from a Pois-son spatial interaction model with spatial effects.
LeSage J.P., Fischer M.M., Scherngell T. Papers in Regio-nal Science, 2007, 86 (3), 393–421.
Measuring industrial knowledge stocks with patents and papers.
Han Y.-J. Journal of Informetrics, 2007, 1 (4), 269–276. Technology mapping using patent literature for supply chain management.
Mittal A.K., Mirdha B. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 2007, 3 (4), 395–404.
Worldwide nanotechnology development: A comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976–2004). Li X., Lin Y., Chen H., Roco M.C. Journal of Nanoparti-cle Research, 2007, 9 (6), 977–1002.
2.2. Patents
2.2.1. Relating to life sciences and pharmaceuticals A spoonful of sugar [changing pharmaceutical market]. Streatfield S., Knowles J. Patent World, 2007, (196), 30–33. Embryonic stem cell patents and human dignity.
Resnik D.B. Health Care Analysis, 2007, 15 (3), 211–222. Generic competition and market exclusivity periods in pharmaceuticals.
Grabowski H.G., Kyle M. Managerial and Decision Eco-nomics, 2007, 28 (39206), 491–502.
History and progress of the generation of structural formu-lae in chemistry and its applications.
Gugisch R. et al. Match, 2007, 58 (2), 239–280.
Justification of subject-matter for legal protection of tradi-tional knowledge.
Liu Y. European Intellectual Property Review, 2007, 29 (11), 456–460.
Latest state of play of the implementation in the EU of the Biotech Directive 98/44.
CIPA Journal, 2007, 36 (8), 441–446.
Patent disclosure requirements and benefit sharing: A counterfactual case of Morocco’s argan oil.
Lybbert T.J. Ecological Economics, 2007, 64 (1), 12–18. Patents and access to antiretroviral medicines in Vietnam after World Trade Organisation accession.
Kuanpoth J. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2007, 10 (3–4), 201–224.
Stop what you are thinking: Are the cards stacked against generics?
van Wensveen C., Cox G. Pharma Patent Bulletin, 2007, 10 (5), 1,3–4.
The cleft-stick between anti retroviral drug patents and HIV/AIDS victims: an in depth analysis of the WTO’s TRIPs Art.31bis amendment proposal of December 6, 2006.
Ademariam S.W. Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2007, (4), 414–466.
The international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture within the current legal regime complex on plant genetic resources.
Gerstetter C. et al. The Journal of World Intellectual Prop-erty, 2007, 10 (3–4), 259–283.
The right dose [Canadian patented medicines].
Garland S., Hamilton S., Choi A. Patent World, 2007, (196), 25–28.
The Value-Relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Biotechnology Industry.
Yang Y.-W. Advances in Accounting, 2007, (23) 287–314. Traditional knowledge and intellectual property protec-tion: Past and future.
Desai P.N., Science and Public Policy, 2007, 34 (3), 185–197.
Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research.
Walsh J.P., Cohen W.M., Cho C. Research Policy, 2007, 36 (8), 1184–1203.
2.2.2. Relating to software
Getting technical – a method of doing business has no busi-ness at the patent office.
Harris K., Low T. Patent World, 2007, (197), 19–21. Keeping Score in the IP Game.
Sweet W. IEEE Spectrum, 2007, (November), http:// www.spectrum.ieee.org/nov07/5645.
Korea’s banks prepare to patent [business methods]. Chung H., Kim C.-J. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (October), 57–60.
The good, the bad, and the messy.
Thatcher M.E., Pingry D.E. Communications of the ACM, 2007, 50 (10), 1290961, 47–52.
The new developments in patent protection for inventions involving computer programs in China a study based on the newly amended Chinese patent examination guidelines.
Xiang Y., Shan L. IIC International Review of
Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2007, 38 (6), 659–668.
2.2.3. Policy and strategic issues
Colourful visions for the future [EPO scenarios]. Patent World, 2007, (197), 16–17.
Imagining the IP future [EPO scenarios].
Elahi S. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007,
(September), 72–75.
Do patents over-compensate innovators?
Denicolo V. Economic Policy, 2007, 22 (52), 679– 729.
Europe and the international community of states on the path towards a common patent strategy?
Schade J. IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2007, 38 (5), 517–520.
Examining the USPTO.
McDermott E. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (November), 42–49.
Now you’re speaking my language! [London Agreement]. Roberts G., Pitchford J. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (November), 58–62.
Patents as constitutional private property: The historical protection of patents under the takings clause.
Mossoff A. Boston University Law Review, 2007, 87 (3), 689–724.
Private value of European patents.
Deng Y. European Economic Review, 2007, 51 (7), 1785– 1812.
The need and purposes of a ‘‘nanotechnology Act” in Ger-many and Europe.
Beyerlein T. Nanotechnology Law and Business, 2006, 3 (4), 539–549.
2007 Patent reform bill: Will it benefit nanotechnology? Maebius S.B. Nanotechnology Law and Business, 2007, 4 (2), 171–177.
Why obviousness is anything but obvious.
Harris G. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (Novem-ber), 34–37.
2.2.4. Other patent topics Innovation in India.
Stembridge B. Thomson Knowledgelink Newsletter, 2007, (November), http://scientific.thomson.com/news/newslet-ter/2007-11/8418387/.
‘‘Stacking” and ‘‘picking” inventions: The patenting beha-vior of European inventors.
Mariani M., Romanelli M. Research Policy, 2007, 36 (8), 1128–1142.
A brief review of nanotechnology funding and patenting in Japan.
Escoffier L. Nanotechnology Law and Business, 2007, 4 (1), 101–108.
A European perspective on obviousness – a degree of flex-ibility.
Taylor R., McDonnell J. Patent World, 2007, (195), 14–15.
A new pitfall in patenting nanomaterial manufacturing: The need for reform.
Rutt J.S., Radomsky L. Nanotechnology Law and Busi-ness, 2006, 3 (4), 455–465.
Cause for careful planning – consequences of recent En-larged Board of Appeal decisions.
Abnett R., Millburn J., Sackin R. Patent World, 2007, (197), 25–27.
Cease and desist (please) [US patents].
Matheson J.A., Greenstein S. Managing Intellectual Prop-erty, 2007, (September), 28–30.
Commercial patent evaluation.
Hassler V. Proceedings of the ninth International
Conference on Telecommunications, ConTEL 2007,
4267468, 5.
Divisions over divisionals: Enlarged Board decisions G1/05 and G1/06.
Jackson T. CIPA Journal, 2007, 36 (9), 497–500. Global patent harmonisation and nodal governance: it’s ‘‘de´ja` vu all over again”.
Davies L. Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2007, (4), 466– 488.
How KSR applies to patent applications.
Isacson J. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (September), 60–62.
How Seagate affects patent owners and defendants [wilful-ness].
Tucher A., Huttner C. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (October), 31–34.
Institutionalized incentives for ingenuity-Patent value and the German Employees’ Inventions Act.
Harhoff D., Hoisl K. Research Policy, 2007, 36 (8), 1143– 1162.
Intellectual property rights abuses in the patent licensing of technology standards from developing countries: a study of some typical cases from China.
Zhan Y., Zhu X. The Journal of World Intellectual Prop-erty, 2007, 10 (3–4), 187–200.
Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey.
Giuri P. et al. Research Policy, 2007, 36 (8), 1107– 1127.
Iraqi patent law-In search of compliance with TRIPS. Malkawi B.H. IIC International Review of Intellectual
Property and Competition Law, 2007, 38 (5),
591–604.
It ain’t what you do it’s the way that you do it – govern-mental compulsory licensing.
Westerlund L. Patent World, 2007, (197), 29–34. Keeping secrets [UK trade secrets].
Anderson R., Turner S. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (September), 45–47.
Knowledge diffusion under patent with asymmetric firms. Mukherjee A., Sinha U.B. Economics Bulletin, 2007, 12 (9).
Legislation v case law: Introduction of the Bolar exemption in the EU and Japan.
Trenton A., Sha T. Patent World, 2007, (195), 29–33. New US patent rules – preparation is the key.
Vorhees C.M., Ludwig S.R. CIPA Journal, 2007, 36 (9), 490–493.
Not an obvious decision [Canada invalidity]. Locke G. Patent World, 2007, (196), 11–12. Patent law and practice in Kenya.
Sibanya B. IIC International Review of Intellectual Prop-erty and Competition Law, 2007, 38 (6), 648–659.
Patent litigation in the People’s Republic of China. Muller-Stoy T. IIC International Review of Intellectual
Property and Competition Law, 2007, 38 (5),
520–548.
Protecting the company jewels in an unprotected country [China].
Holstein W.J. Research Technology Management, 2007, (November–December), 14–16.
Reining in extraterritorial effects [US law]. Adamo K. Patent World, 2007, (195), 16–17.
Reverse engineering in support of litigation: Experiences in an adversarial environment.
Cox A., Smedley T., 2006, Proceedings-Working
Conference on Reverse Engineering, WCRE, 4023999, 288–290.
Telecom battles come to the courtroom [standards and pa-tents].
Nurton J. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (Novem-ber), 50–54.
The carbon nanotube patent landscape.
Nanotechnology Law and Business, 2006, 3 (4), 427–454. The Effect of Innovative Activity on Firm Performance: The Experience of Taiwan.
Anandarajan A. et al. Advances in Accounting, 2007, 23, 1–30.
The impact of patents on IP and business value. Forbes T. CIPA Journal, 2007, 36 (8), 446–448.
The importance of being first to file – The US patent Re-form Act of 2007.
Moradian P., Tsavaris J. Patent World, 2007, (197), 22–24. The legal status of academic employees’ inventions in Britain and Germany and its consequences for R&D-Agreements. Stallberg C.G. Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2007, (4), 489–530.
The market for patents in Europe.
Gambardella A., Giuri P., Luzzi A. Research Policy, 2007, 36 (8), 1163–1183.
The philosopher’s stone – research tools and reach through claims.
Pietacciolli D. Patent World, 2007, (196), 22–24.
U.S. Supreme Court makes it easier for patent licensee to have its cake and eat it too.
Silverman A.B. JOM, 2007, 59 (4), 80. UK needs clarity on Swiss-style claims.
Jones N., Ch’en F. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (September), 85–87.
University patenting and the pace of industrial innovation. Fabrizio K.R. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2007, 16 (4), 505–534.
University perspective on commercialization of IP. Martin M.J. Research Technology Management, 2007, (September–October), 13–16.
Using AHP in patent valuation.
Chiu Y.-J., Chen Y.-W. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2007, 46 (39301), 1054–1062.
What every plastics professional should know about pa-tents and patenting- Part 3: Lawful designing around valid U.S. patents.
Tayebi A. Annual Technical Conference-ANTEC, Confer-ence Proceedings, 2007, 2, 903–904.
Wilfulness standard: Is there a bright line? [US].
Conlin J.M., Roberg-Perez S.E. World Intellectual Prop-erty Review, 2007, 21 (9), 28–30.
2.3. Trademarks and Domain Names 2.3.1. Trademarks
Protecting and managing well-known trademarks.
Kanesarajah V. Thomson KnowledgeLink Newsletter, 2007, (November), http://scientific.thomson.com/news/ newsletter/2007-11/8418529/.
3-Dimensional perspectives.
Heath G., Peters M. Trademark World, 2007, (201), 24–27.
A minefield for the unwary...
Smith C. Trademark World, 2007, (202), 22–25. All change for UK trademarks.
Streets E. Trademark World, 2007, (202), 20–21.
An analysis of the E-Communities: Protection of trademarks and geographical indications for agricultural products and foodstuffs dispute.
Charlier C., Ngo M.A. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2007, 10 (3–4), 171–186.
Branding on the shelves [retailer’s marks].
Davies I., Scourfield T. Trademark World, 2007, (202), 32–35.
Brands on wheels [Direct Line case].
Withers K. Trademark World, 2007, (201), 12–13.
Causing confusion? Complementary goods and
similarity.
Henegan K Trademark World, 2007, (200), 20–21. Confusion over use: Contextualism in trademark law. Dinwoodie G.B., Janis M.D. Iowa Law Review, 2007, 92 (5), 1597–1667.
Copycats get the cream [UK legislation].
Lindsay C. Trademark World, 2007, (201), 14–15.
Fair-use-or-not.com [trademark defence].
Smith A., Bevan D. Trademark World, 2007, (202), 40–43.
Federal Court of Appeal rules in Jaguar’s favour. Drapeau D.S. Trademark World, 2007, (202), 16–17. Geographical indications and trade marks: Coexistence or ‘‘first in time, first in right” principle?
Resinek N. European Intellectual Property Review, 2007, 29 (11), 446–455.
Geographical indicators.
Cushley D., McDonald N. Trademark World, 2007, (200), 43–47.
Grounding trademark law through trademark use. Dogan S.L., Lemley M.A. Iowa Law Review, 2007, 92 (5), 1669–1701.
Here we go again... Trademark Use.
Badger C. Trademark World, 2007, (200), 29–31. I(tm): Avatars as trade marks.
Adrian A. Computer Law and Security Report, 2007, 23 (5), 436–448.
In the vernacular [linguistic checking].
Bennett P. Trademark World, 2007, (202), 18–19. Intel: A mark of distinction?
Howell C. European Intellectual Property Review, 2007, 29 (11), 441–445.
Internet revolution? Alternative root models in the Internet in the light of antitrust and trade mark law.
Meyer L., Utz R. European Intellectual Property Review, 2007, 29 (9), 362–370.
Major changes afoot in comparative advertising legislation and case law.
Brodie A. ITMA Review, 2007, (348), 8–12. Making sense of trade mark use.
Yap P.J. European Intellectual Property Review, 2007, 29 (10), 420–427.
Protection of privatisation of culture? The cultural dimension of the international Intellectual Property debate on geographical indications of origin.
Chesmond R. European Intellectual Property Review, 2007, 29 (9), 379–388.
The Company Names Adjudicator: a new weapon for corporate brand owners.
The recipe for successful restaurants [trade dress].
Ghajar B., Burt J. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (October), 28–30.
Trade mark licensing made easy: part two.
Herzfeld O., Bergavoy R. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (September), 63–67.
Trademark law and free speech: Protection for scandalous and disparaging marks.
Smith R. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 2007, 42 (2), 451–482.
Trademarks and tax havens.
Gellman L. Trademark World, 2007, (202), 29–31. Two sides to the coin [Community Trade Mark].
Dunstan S., Jackson N. Trademark World, 2007, (200), 39–42.
US ‘Famous Mark’ doctrine in doubt as Federal Court decisions lack consistency.
Schulte C.J. ITMA Review, 2007, (348), 22–23.
Why Chinese companies must build global brands. Ollier P. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (Octo-ber), 36–43.
2.3.2. Domain Names
A new era in domain disputes.
Alberts W., Trademark World 2007, (202), 45–48. DotAsia.
Taylor D. Trademark World, 2007, (201), 16–18. Taking you for a ride.
Pratt G. Trademark World, 2007, (200), 26–28.
The launch of Asia top level domain names: a briefing for members.
Wood N. ITMA Review, 2007, (349), 10–13.
2.4. Designs No entries.
2.5. Other IP; General IP Issues 2.5.1. Policy and strategic issues
Dispossession, intellectual property, and the sin of theoretical homogeneity.
Hoffstadt B.M. Southern California Law Review, 2007, 80 (5), 909–967.
Intellectual property strategy and best practices for R&D services in China.
Greguras F. Computer Law and Security Report, 2007, 23 (5), 449–452.
Knowledge as a global public good: The role and impor-tance of open access.
Verschraegen G., Schiltz M. Societies without Borders, 2007, 2 (2), 157–174.
The state of intellectual property education
worldwide.
Lakhan S.E., Khurana M.K. Academic Leadership, 2007, 5 (2).
2.5.2. Other IP Issues
Transforming intellectual property in China and Taiwan. Taplin R. Thomson Knowledgelink Newsletter, 2007, (November), http://scientific.thomson.com/news/newslet-ter/2007-11/8418532/.
China Focus 2007.
Managing Intellectual Property, supplement, 2007. Chinese intellectual property rights? Know before you go. Chapa O., LeMaster J. Thunderbird International Business Review, 2007, 49 (5), 567–590.
Australia IP Focus 2007.
Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (November), 74– 98.
Counterfeiting and piracy.
Haie-Fayle L., Hu¨bner W. OECD Observer, 2007, (Sep-tember), http://www.oecdobserver.org/news/fullstory.php/ aid/2278/.
Crisis at the top [WIPO].
Gupte E., Barraclough E. Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (November), 18–20.
Economic and Cultural impact on intellectual property violations: A study of software piracy.
Yang D., Sonmez M. Journal of World Trade, 2007, 41 (4), 731–750.
Japan IP Focus 2007.
Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (September), 96–115.
Mexico IP Focus 2007.
Managing Intellectual Property, 2007, (October), 65–87. Secrets Revealed: How Magicians Protect Intellectual Property without Law.
Loshin J. Social Science Research Network, 2007, (39288), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1005564.
The ‘‘adjusted future free income ratio”: a new methodol-ogy for determining IPR royalty rates.
Samson T. European Intellectual Property Review, 2007, 29 (9), 371–378.
The dynamics of commercialization of scientific knowledge in biotechnology and nanotechnology.
Uranga M.G., Kerexeta G.E., Campas-Velasco J. Eur-opean Planning Studies, 2007, 15 (9), 1199–1214.
The protection of intellectual property rights and endogen-ous growth: Is stronger always better?
Furukawa Y. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2007, 31 (11), 3644–3670.
2.6. Historical
An American inventor abroad: Part one. Gray L. Elevator World, 2007, 55 (8). An American inventor abroad: Part two. Gray L. Elevator World, 2007, 55 (9).
An ingenious idea! Corrugated board.
Pinnington T. International Paper Board Industry, 2007, 50 (9).
The man who really invented the diesel engine.
Ray K., Crighton D. MER-Marine Engineers Review, 2007, (May), 51–52. David Newton Crooked Thatch East End Hook Norton Banbury OX15 5LG United Kingdom E-mail address: [email protected]