• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) vol.25 número62

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) vol.25 número62"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texto

Loading

Imagem

Figure  1.  Comparison  of  interpersonal  positions  between  the  groups.  A  =  Dominant,  B  =  Competitive,  C  =  Mistrusting,  D  =  Cold, E = Hostilite, F = Detached, G = Inhibited, H = Unassured, I =  Submissive, J = Deferent, K = Trusting, L = Wa

Referências

Documentos relacionados

These items were formulated to assess the degree of orientation towards the future, the valorization and integration of present experience as important to the future, and

the analytical style; item 25 - “I plan my classes prioritizing teaching strategies that favor detailed analysis of content”, which was originally thought to belong to

The three main goals of our study using the RWO, a measure of everyday problematic behaviors/negative outcomes that derive from decisions where CT seems to have been absent, were

The validity of the construct of the scale was demonstrated by positive correlations between the four dimensions of job crafting behavior and proactive personality,

This model made it possible to identify that, independent of body size and inaccuracy in perception of body size, considering one’s life to be bad, watching more hours per day

Next, the article Psychometric Studies of the Learning Strategies Scale for University Students , by Evely Boruchovitch, from Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil, and

As a result of the continuing efforts that have been systematically undertaken over the last few years, Paidéia today occupies a prominent place among the publications in the ield

Its main objective is to develop normative standards for the Rorschach method according to the assessment system of the Parisian School, addressing Brazilian adolescents