• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Enhancement of pigment extraction from B. braunii pretreated using CO2 rapid depressurization

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Enhancement of pigment extraction from B. braunii pretreated using CO2 rapid depressurization"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texto

(1)

h tt p : / / w w w . b j m i c r o b i o l . c o m . b r /

Industrial

Microbiology

Enhancement

of

pigment

extraction

from

B.

braunii

pretreated

using

CO

2

rapid

depressurization

Edgar

Uquiche

a,b,∗

,

Ivette

Antilaf

a

,

Sonia

Millao

a

aDepartmentofChemicalEngineering,CenterofFoodBiotechnologyandBioseparations,BIOREN,UniversidaddeLaFrontera(UFRO),

Temuco,Chile

bAgriaquacultureNutritionalGenomicCenter,CGNA,TechnologyandProcessesUnit,UFRO,Temuco,Chile

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received6March2015 Accepted25September2015 Availableonline2March2016 AssociateEditor:GiseleMonteirode Souza Keywords: Botryococcusbraunii Celldisruption Chlorophylls Microalgae Supercriticalextraction

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Extraction ofcompoundsfrommicroalgaerequirescelldisruption asa pretreatmentto increaseextractionyield.Botryococcusbrauniiisamicroalgawithasignificantcontentof carotenoidsandotherantioxidantcompounds,suchaschlorophylls.CelldisruptionofB. brauniiusingCO2rapiddepressurizationwasstudiedasapretreatmentfortheextractionof

carotenoidandchlorophyllpigments.Westudiedtheeffectoftemperature(21–49◦C)and pressure(6–13MPa)duringstaticcompressiononpigmentrecoverywithsupercriticalCO2at

40◦C,30MPaandsolventflowof4.7LNPT/min.Withintheexperimentalregion,the extrac-tionyieldofcarotenoidsandchlorophyllsincreasedby2.4-and2.2-foldrespectively.Static compressionconditionsofhighpressureandlowtemperatureincreasedtheextractionof carotenoidsandespeciallychlorophylls.Weselected21◦Cand13MPaasthecelldisruption condition,whichproduced1.91g/kgd.s.ofcarotenoidsand14.03mg/kgd.s.ofchlorophylls. Pretreatedmicroalgagavea10-foldhigherchlorophyllextractionyieldcomparedtothe untreatedsample.Whileforcarotenoidsandtocopherolswere1.25and1.14-foldhigher, respectively.Additionally,antioxidantactivityofpretreatedmicroalga(33.22mmolTE/kg oil)wassignificantlyhigherthanthevaluefortheuntreatedsamples(29.11mmolTE/kgoil) (p≤0.05).Confocalmicroscopyimagesshowedmorphologicaldifferencesbetween micro-colonieswithandwithoutdisruptiontreatment,suggestingthatpartialcelldisruptionby rapiddepressurizationimprovedtheextractionofmicroalgacompounds.

©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisis anopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense

(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Introduction

Microalgaeareabroadgroupofautotrophicorganismswhich growby photosynthesis and can becultivated as a source

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:[email protected](E.Uquiche).

ofbioactivecompoundswithhighcommercialvalue.1

Botry-ococcus braunii isaunicellular green microalgaofthe class

Chlorophyceae,characterizedbytheproductionofchlorophyll pigments.B.brauniicellsareheldtogetherbyan extracellu-larmatrixcomposedofacross-linkedaldehydepolymercore

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.01.020

1517-8382/©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

(2)

andarecapableofproducinglargeamountsofhydrocarbons, exopolysaccharidesandcarotenoids.2,3 Thesehydrocarbons

arelargelystoredintheextracellularmatrix.4B.brauniiis

clas-sifiedintothreeracesA,BandL,dependingonthetypesof hydrocarbonsproduced.5Thepresenceofcarotenoidsismore

pronouncedinracesBandL.6Thecarotenoidsfoundinclude

␤-carotene,lutein,violaxanthin,canthaxanthin,astaxanthin, zeaxanthin.7,8 B. braunii isan interestingmicroalga forthe

extractionofhigh-valuecompoundsforusesinnutraceutical applications.7,9

Oneofthecharacteristicsofmicroalgaeistherigidityof theircellwalls.InB.brauniithewallofeachcellhasan inter-nal fibrillar layer made of polysaccharide and an external trilaminarsheath.4 CellwallofB. braunii iscomposed ofa

cellulose-likepolysaccharide(as␤-1,4-and/or␤-1,3-glucan).10

Cell disruptionis thereforenecessary torelease intracellu-larcompoundsandimproveextractionsolventaccess.11The

followingmethodshavebeenusedformicroalgalcell disrup-tion: sonication,11 high-pressure homogenizers,12 chemical

disruption,13enzymaticdegradation,14beadmilling,11,15and

microwaves.16

Studiescomparing methodsofmicroalga celldisruption have been reported inliterature. Differentmethods ofcell disruptiontoidentifythemosteffectivemethodfor extract-inglipidsfrommicroalgae(Botryococcussp.,Chlorellavulgaris,

and Scenedesmus sp.) wasinvestigated.13 Amongthe

meth-odstested(autoclaving,beadmilling,microwaves,sonication, andtreatmentwith10%NaClsolution),themicrowaveoven wasthemostefficientforlipidrecovery.Inotherstudywas investigateddifferentcelldisruptionmethodsforextracting lipidsfrommicroalgae(Chlorellasp.,Nostocsp.andTolypothrix

sp.),includingautoclaving,beadmilling,microwave, sonica-tionandtreatmentwith10%NaClsolution.17Thesonication

wasthe mostefficient methodforlipid recovery. However, thesonicationmethodhasbeenindicatedtobeunscalable. Beadmillingandhigh-pressurehomogenizingarescalablefor industrialuse.Celldisruptionbybeadmillisbasedon sub-jectingcellstohighstressproducedbyabrasionduringrapid agitationwithglassorceramicbeads.Thismethodiseffective withdifferenttypesofmicroorganism.18Incelldisruptionby

high-pressurehomogenizer,thecellsuspensionisforcedto passthroughanadjustabledischargevalvewitharestricted orifice.19 Castor and Hong,20 pointed out that mechanical

celldisruptionmethodsarenon-selectiveincellwall disrup-tion;this leadstotheformation ofsmall fragmentsofcell wall,increasingthedownstreampurificationburdenbecause these fragments are difficult to separate from the process stream.18

Gasparetal.21studiedtheeffectofthedecompressionrate

ondisruptionefficiencyintrichomesfromoriganumbracts. Theyobservedthatasthedecompressionrateincreased,the pressuredropacrosstheglandwallalsoincreased,resultingin higherdisruptionefficiency.Thus,disruptionoftheseglands wascausedbyapressure gradientformedacrossthegland wallsduringrapiddepressurization.DuringtheCO2

compres-sionstage,glandswereslightlypermeabletothepassageof CO2byaprocessakintodiffusion.

Studies ofcell disruptionusing CO2 rapid

depressuriza-tiontoimprovetheavailabilityofextractedsoluteshavebeen reportedinliterature.Thismethodisbasedonintroducing

a pressurized subcritical or supercritical gas into the cells followedbyrapiddepressurization,causingcelldisruption.18

During thestageofstatic compression,supercriticalCO2 is

verydiffusibleand canpenetratecells.21Afterthecells are

saturated with CO2, a sudden depressurisation is applied

and a pressure gradient across the cell wall is generated. Theyobservedthatasthedecompressionrateincreased,the pressure drop across the glandwall alsoincreased, result-inginhigherdisruptionefficiency.Thus,disruptionofthese glandswascausedbyapressuregradientformedacrossthe gland wallsduringrapiddepressurization.The cell disrup-tionoccursduetotheexpansionoftheCO2,whichimproves

thespeedandincreasestheextractionyield.22,23Furthermore,

cellsareexposedtominimalshearforces,sonoheatis gen-eratedwhichmightdamageheatsensitivecompounds,such ascarotenoidsandchlorophylls.

Temperature, pressure and exposure time during static compression are the operational variables that may affect the efficiency of cell disruption.24 Juhász et al.23 studied

the effect ofCO2 rapiddepressurization on endoglucanase

recoveryfromEscherichiacoli.Thetemperature(32–45◦C)and pressure (12–25MPa) affected the recovery of the enzyme, whileexposuretime(5–60min)hadnosignificanteffect.Rapid depressurization has been applied to disruption bacterial cells,25–27yeastcells,28,29gojiberryseeds,30rapepollen31and

trichomes.21,32

Extraction withsolvents isthe traditionaltechniquefor lipid extraction from microalgae. Lipids are traditionally extracted using nonpolar solvents, commonly n-hexane.33

However,theUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency listed n-hexaneamong187hazardous airpollutantsinthe 2002 National-Scale Air ToxicsAssessments because of its toxic nature.34 Supercritical fluid extraction has received

increasing attentionas anextractiontechnique, because it can provide high solubility, improved mass-transfer rates, and increased selectivity with small changes in the tem-peratureandpressureoftheextractionoperation.35 Carbon

dioxide (CO2) is probably the most widely used

supercrit-ical fluid, and has emerged as a substitute for n-hexane for the extractionof nonpolar solutesfrom biological sub-strates, duetoits inertness,non-toxicity, non-flammability andnon-explosiveness.36Furthermore,itsrelativelylow

crit-icalpropertiesmakeCO2(Tc=31.1◦C,Pc=7.38MPa)anideal

solventfortheextractionofthermallylabilecomponents.We studiedextractionfromB.brauniiusingCO2supercriticalfluid

at40◦Candpressures of12.5,20 and30MPa.37The

extrac-tionyieldandthefractionofthehydrocarbonsintheextracts bothincreasedwithpressureandat30MPathesecompounds wereobtainedrapidly.Theauthorsreportedthatchlorophylls werenotdetectedintheextracts.Santanaetal.38studiedthe

extractionoflipidsfrom B.braunii forbiodieselproduction. Theseexperimentswereconductedattemperaturesfrom50 to 80◦C and pressures from 20 to 25MPa. Lipid extraction yieldwasfoundtodecreasewithtemperatureandtoincrease with pressure.Carotenoids and chlorophylls are important antioxidants.39,40 Thesepigments can beextracted from B.

brauniiusingsupercriticalCO2,andcanbeusedasan

indica-torofcelldisruptioninthecaseofphotosyntheticmicroalgae speciescontainingchlorophyllandcarotenoids,becausethey arereleasedwhenthecellcollapseoccurs.41

(3)

Cell disruptionusing rapiddepressurization can be car-riedoutinsupercriticalextractionequipment,sothatafter pretreatment, temperatureand pressure conditions are set tocarryout the supercriticalextractionofthe lipidic com-pounds.Thisproceduresavestimeandminimizesequipment andlaborrequirementsaswellascontaminationandextract loss.24Also,itcanbescaledup toindustrialscale.20If

pre-treatmentandextractionareconductedinthesameextractor, thesubstratewillbeprotectedfromexposuretooxygenand hightemperature,avoidingoxidationreactions.Microalgacell disruptionusingCO2rapiddepressurizationhasnotyetbeen

reported in literature. In this work, we hypothesized that celldisruptionofB.brauniiusingrapiddepressurizationmay enhance the extractionyieldofpigments, carotenoidsand chlorophylls,byadjustingthetemperatureandpressure con-ditionsunderstaticcompression.Theobjectiveofthiswork wastoimprovetherecoveryofpigmentsfromB.brauniiwith supercriticalCO2,throughapretreatmentofcelldisruption

using CO2 rapiddepressurization. Responsesurface design

wasusedtoevaluatetheeffectofthestaticcompression con-ditionsonpigmentrecoveryfromB.braunii.

Materials

and

methods

Substrate

B.brauniiUTEXLB572wassuppliedbyUniversidadde Antofa-gasta (Antofagasta, Chile). This strain corresponds to race Bandwasculturedunderoutdoorproductioninpilot-scale panel reactors.42 Microalga samples consisted of air-dried

microalgae,whichwerecarefullymilledwithmortarand pes-tleuntilaparticlesizeoflessthanTylermesh40wasobtained. Averageparticlesizewas0.244mm.Themicroalgasamplehad amoisturecontentof7.9±0.2/100gdrysubstrate(d.s.) (deter-minedgravimetricallybydryinginanovenfor10hat102◦C) andanoilcontentof106±2g/kgd.s.(determined gravimet-ricallybyextractionwithtechnicalgradehexaneinSoxhlet apparatusfor10hat70◦C).Sampleswerestoreduntilusein dry,darkconditions,packedintheabsenceofoxygen.

Substratepretreatment

Theinitialsampleofmicroalgasamplesconsistedofair-dried microalgae. Thissample was divided into two fractions: a fractionwithouttreatmentbyrapiddepressurization(as con-trol),andtheotherfractionsubjectedtotreatmentbyrapid depressurization.ThepretreatmentusingCO2rapid

depres-surization began by loading ca. 5g of microalgae sample (substratecharacterized)intoa50cm3extractionvessel

(14-mminternaldiameter).Theextractionvesselwasplacedin anair-convectionovenofaSpe-edSFEunit(Applied Separa-tions,Allentown,PA).Priortopretreatment,airtrappedinthe extractionvesselwaspurgedbymeansofacontrolledflowof CO2.Theextractionvesselwasthenpressurizedwith

high-purity(99.95% pure)CO2 (Linde, Santiago, Chile), and kept

understaticcompression for1h, atdifferentcombinations oftemperature(21–49◦C) andpressure (6–13MPa).TheCO2

wasthenquicklyreleasedbyopeningavalve,whichallowed thepressuretodiminishtonormalatmosphericpressure;the

extractionvesselwasthenkeptatatmosphericpressurefora further10min.

Supercriticalextraction

Itwasthenre-pressurizedandthepretreatedsubstratewas extracted at 40◦C (temperatureof the air convection oven containing the extraction vessel, controlled automatically) and30MPa(extractionpressurecontrolledmanuallywithan air-booster pump), with 4.7L NPT/min of CO2 with a

sin-glesuperficialvelocityof1mm/s.Inallcases,theextraction wascarriedoutfor60min(correspondingtoaspecific con-sumptionofsolventof101.5kgCO2/kgd.s.),afterwhichthe

expansion valve (kept at120◦C) was opened. Of this way, rapid depressurization ofthe microalgae cells and consec-utivesupercriticalCO2extractionwerecarriedoutwiththe

samesubstratechargewithintheextractorvessel.This pro-cedureissimilartothatreportedinothersstudies.31,32The

oilrecoveredwasassessedgravimetricallybydifferenceusing cleanedanddriedglassvials,andtheextractedoilyield(Yoil,

g/kgd.s.)wasmeasured.Eachexperimentalassaywas con-ductedinduplicate.Recoveredoilextractswereusedforlater analysis.

Analysisofextracts

Carotenoid concentration (Ccar, g carotenoids/kg oil) was

quantified in an oil sample dissolved in chloroform p.a. (Merck,Darmstadt,Germany).Absorbancewasreadat452nm byspectrophotometryinaGenesys10SUV-Vis spectropho-tometer(ThermoFisherScientificInc.,Madison,WI).32 The

standard fortheanalysisofcarotenoids(␤-carotene typeI, ≥95% pure)was obtainedfrom Sigma–Aldrich (SaintLouis, MO). The carotenoid extraction yield (Ycar, g/kg d.s.) was

obtainedfromYoil×Ccar.Chlorophyllconcentration(Cchlor,mg

chlorophyllsaandb/kgoil)wasquantifiedinanoilsample dissolvedinethyletherp.a.andabsorbancewasreadat642 and 660nm inthe spectrophotometer.Chlorophyllaand b

contentsweredeterminedusingequationsreportedby Wrol-stadetal.43Thechlorophyllextractionyield(Y

chlor,mg/kgd.s.)

wasobtainedfromYoil×Cchlor.Thetocopherolconcentration

(Ctoc,gtocopherol/kgoil)ofselectedoilsampleswas

quanti-fiedat520nmin␣-tocopherolequivalents.44Thestandardfor

theanalysisoftocopherols␣-tocopherolwasobtainedfrom Sigma–Aldrich.Thetocopherolextractionyield(g/kgd.s.)was estimatedfromYoil×Ctoc.Antioxidantactivityofselectedoil

sampleswasmeasuredusingaTroloxequivalentantioxidant capacityassay.45Antioxidantactivitywasexpressedas

mil-limoleTroloxequivalent/kgoil.Troloxstandardwasobtained fromSigma–Aldrich(SaintLouis,MO).

Confocalmicroscopy

Controlsampleandmicroalgaepretreatedwithrapid depres-surization were observed with confocal microscopy. A microalgasample(100mg)wassuspendedin1mLof phos-phatebuffer(pH7.5at25◦C)inanEppendorftubeandfiltered throughaMilliporefilter(MilliporeCorp.,Bedford,MA).A solu-tion ofwhite calcofluor(Sigma–Aldrich, SaintLouis,MO)in dimethylsulfoxide(MerckKGaA,Darmstadt,Germany) was

(4)

Table1–Extractionyieldofcarotenoids(Ycar)andchlorophylls(Ychlor)byCO2at40Cand30MPaasafunctionof

temperatureandpressureofstaticcompression.

Run T [◦C] P [MPa] X1 [–] X2 [–] Ycar [gcar/kgd.s.] Ychlor [mgchlor/kgd.s.] 1 25 7.0 −1 −1 1.12 12.19 2 45 7.0 1 −1 0.73 11.53 3 25 12.0 −1 1 1.46 13.78 4 45 12.0 1 1 1.29 9.97 5 21 9.5 −1.41 0 1.72 10.78 6 49 9.5 1.41 0 1.00 7.44 7 35 6.0 0 −1.41 0.78 12.94 8 35 13.0 0 1.41 1.11 16.03 9 35 9.5 0 0 1.02 13.04 10 35 9.5 0 0 1.01 12.68 11 35 9.5 0 0 0.93 11.91 12 35 9.5 0 0 0.99 12.41

prepared in 1:10 ratio v/v. Suspension of microalgae was markedwith100␮Lofcalcofluorsolutionandincubated at roomtemperaturefor15min.Thesuspensionwascentrifuged inaHitachi centrifugeCT15E(HitachiKokiCo.,Ltd.,Tokyo, Japan). Microalgae samples were viewed using a Confocal LaserMicroscopeFV-1000(OlympusCorp.,Tokyo,Japan). Flu-oViewsoftwareFV-102.0(OlympusCorp.,Tokyo,Japan)was usedforimageacquisition(40×magnification).

Experimentdesign

Central composite rotatable design (CCRD) was used to evaluatetheeffectsoftheindependentvariables:coded tem-perature(X1,Eq.(1),whereTistemperature◦C),andcoded

pressure (X2, Eq. (2), where P is pressure in MPa), both

expressedindimensionlessunits,ontheresponsevariables: extractionyieldofcarotenoids(Ycar)andchlorophylls(Ychlor).

X1= T−35

10 (1)

X2= P−

9.5

2.5 (2)

The design was based on a two-factor factorial design (n=2),withtwolevels(codedvalues−1and+1.Thefactors

andtheirlevelsareshowninTable1.TheCCRDmatrixhad 4(2n)cubepoints(runs1–4)and4(2n)starpoints(runs5–8),

atanaxialdistancetothe centerof1.41 (˛=2n/4),and four

replications of the center points (runs 9–12) to determine experimental error(Table1). Experiments were carried out inarandomizedordertominimizetheeffectofunexpected variability inthe observedresponseduetoextraneous fac-tors.Asecond-ordermodel(Eq.(3))wasusedtodescribethe responsevariableYasafunctionofcodedtemperature(X1)

andcodedpressure(X2),

Y=A0+A1X1+A2X2+A12X1X2+A11X12+A22X22 (3)

whereA0isaconstant;A1andA2arelinearcoefficients;A12

isacross-productcoefficient;andA11andA22arequadratic

coefficients.Three-dimensionalsurfaceresponseplotswere generated by varying the two variables within the experi-mental range. The model fit was evaluated byanalysis of variance (ANOVA). Thecoefficientsofthe responsesurface equationwereestimatedusingDesignExpertDesign-Expert Software,version6.0.1(Stat-Ease,Inc.,Minneapolis,MN).The statistical significancewasbasedon thetotal errorcriteria withaconfidencelevelof95%.

Table2–Analysisofvarianceofregressioncoefficientsandstatisticalindicatorsofappropriatenessofthesecondorder modelselected.

Regressioncoefficient Ycar Ychlor

Estimate p-Value Estimate p-Value

A1 −0.1972 0.0003 −1.147 0.0080 A2 +0.1708 0.0009 +0.543 0.1274 A2 1 +0.1892 0.0008 −1.682 0.0019 A2 2 +1.018 0.0234 F-value 29.89* 13.75* r2 0.918 0.887 Adjustedr2 0.888 0.821 Lackoffit 8.00ns 5.30ns Signal-to-noiseratio 16.63 13.63 ∗ Significantatp0.001;ns:non-significant(p>0.05).

(5)

Results

and

discussion

The experimental results of the extraction yields of carotenoids(Ycar)andchlorophylls(Ychlor)asafunctionofthe

temperatureandpressureappliedduringstaticcompression areshowninTable1.Experimentaldataistheaverageoftwo measurements.Wenotethatthepressuredropoccurred in thefirst 10s.For celldisruption ofrapepollencollected by bees,wasreportedthatthepressure(treatmentat45MPa)was quicklyreleasedwithin1min.31Fortreatmentof

microorgan-ismwithcompressedCO2,wasreportedthatarapidrelease

oftheCO2 pressure(1.5–5MPa)waswithin4s.26 Oil

extrac-tion yield (Yoil) ranged from 84.43 to 103.01g/kg d.s. (full

datanotshown).Carotenoidextractionyield(Ycar,g/kgd.s.)

rangedfrom0.73to1.72g/kgd.s.,2.4-folddifferences. Chloro-phyllextractionyield(Ychlor,mg/kgd.s.)rangedfrom7.44to

16.03mg/kgd.s.,2.2-folddifferences.

Table2summarizesthestatisticalindicatorsobtainedfrom

theanalysisofvarianceappliedtothe second-ordermodel selected (Eqs. (4) and (5)). The modelwas considered ade-quatebecauseofthesignificanceofthemodel(p≤0.001),the non-significance ofthe lack offit (p>0.05)relative topure error,thehighsignal-to-noiseratio(>4)andhighcoefficientof determination(r2).Forinstance,thiscoefficientindicatesthat

themodelexplains91.8%ofthevariabilityinthecarotenoid extractionyieldYcar.The informationprovidedbythe

sta-tisticalindicatorswas complementedbyagoodcorrelation between predicted and experimental responses withinthe experimentalrangeinvestigated,forbothresponses,sincethe plotshowsaclosefitoftheexperimentalwiththepredicted values(datanonshown).

Extractionyieldsofcarotenoidsandchlorophylls

Analysisofvariancewasusedtoevaluatethesignificanceof themodel’sregressioncoefficients(Table2).Alargeregression coefficientandasmallp-valuewouldindicateamore signif-icanteffectontheresponsevariable.Significantcoefficients (p>0.05)wereusedtowritethesecondordermodels.The vari-ablewiththelargesteffectonthecarotenoidextractionyield wasthelineartermofthetemperature(p=0.0003),followed bythequadratictermofthetemperature(p=0.0008)andthe lineartermofthepressure(p=0.0009).Therewasno signifi-canteffectofthequadratictermofthepressure(p=0.5212), noroftheinteractiontermbetweentemperatureandpressure (p=0.2708).Thusthesecond-ordermodel(Eq.(4))establishes a statistically significant relationship between carotenoid recoveryandthetemperatureandpressureconditionswhen carryingoutrapiddepressurizationintheselected experimen-tal range(6≤P≤13MPa;21≤T≤49◦C). Coded variables are importantbecausetheygiveadirect,quantitativeindication oftheeffectoftheindependentvariablesonanydependent variable as a function of the selected experimental range. ThetermA2(=+0.1782),whichmultipliesthelineartermX2,

indicates that the carotenoidextraction yield increases by 0.1782g/kgd.s.whenthecompressionpressureincreasesby 2.5[=0.5(12–7)]MPawhileoperatingat35◦C(X1=0).

Ycar=0.9705−0.1972X1+0.1708X2+0.1892X21 (4)

The variable with the largest effect on the chlorophyll extractionyieldwas thequadratictermofthetemperature (p=0.0019),followed bythe linearterm ofthe temperature (p=0.0080)andthequadratictermofthepressure(p=0.0234). Therewasnosignificanteffectofthelineartermofthe pres-sure(p=0.1274)oroftheinteractiontermbetween tempera-tureandpressure(p=0.0670).Thus,astatisticallysignificant relationshipbetweenchlorophyllrecoveryandthe tempera-tureandpressureconditionshasbeenestablishedwiththe followingsecond-ordermodel(Eq.(5)).Thelineartermofthe pressure(A2=+0.543)wasnotremovedfromEq.(5)to

main-tainthehierarchyofthemodel.Tobettervisualizetheeffectof thetemperatureandpressureontherecoveryofcarotenoids

0.68 0.97 1.27 1.56 1.86 Y1 Y2 21 28 35 42 49 6.0 7.8 9.5 11.3 13.0 T: Temperature P: Pressure

A

B

15.45 13.47 11.49 9.51 7.53 13.0 11.3 9.5 7.8 6.0 21 28 35 42 49 T: Temperature P: Pressure

Fig.1–Surfaceplotofextractionyieldat40◦Cand30MPa

withCO2,for:(A)carotenoids(Ycar,gcar/kgd.s.)and(B)

chlorophylls(Ychlor,mgchlor/kgd.s.),asafunctionof

temperature(T,◦C)andpressure(P,MPa)oftherapid

(6)

andchlorophyllsintheexperimentalrange,surfaceresponse graphsweregeneratedusingthesecond-ordermodels

Ychlor=12.502−1.147X1+0.543X2−1.682X21+1.018X22 (5)

Effectsoftemperatureandpressure

Carotenoidrecoverydecreasedwithincreasingtemperature inthelowertemperature range(<40◦C).There wasa nega-tivelineareffect(A1=−0.1972)(Eq.(4))oftemperature.Thus,

weobservedthatcarotenoidrecoverydecreasesfrom1.86to 1.16g/kgd.s.whentemperatureincreasesfrom21to40◦Cat 13MPa.Intheuppertemperaturerange,over40◦C,the posi-tivenon-lineareffectoftemperature(A2

1=+0.1892)becomes

important and carotenoid recovery increases slightly with temperature.Similar behavior forYcarwas observedinthe

lowerpressurerange.

Tochlorophyllsrecovery,thenegativelineareffectof tem-perature (A1=−1.147) (Eq. (5)) was observed in the upper

temperature range (over ∼35◦C). When the temperature

increasedfrom35 to49◦Cat13MPa,Ychlor decreasedfrom

15.26to10.36mg/kgd.s.Thenegativenon-lineareffectof tem-perature(A2

1=−1.682)becomesimportantfortemperatures

below35◦C.This was reflected in the plateau for temper-atures between 30 and 35◦C, where there was a minimal changeinYchlor and15.41and 15.26mg/kgd.s.respectively

were obtained. Similar behavior for Ychlor for temperature

changeswasobservedinthelower pressurerange. Accord-ingtoanalysisofvariance,thequadratictermoftemperature contributed28%and37%toexplainingthebehaviorofYcarand

Ychlor,respectively.Thequadratictermofpressurecontributed

13%toexplainingthebehaviorofYchlor.

Carotenoidrecoveryincreasedwithpressure(A2=+0.1708)

(Eq.(4))towhatevertemperatureduringstaticcompression. TherewasapositiveeffectofpressureonYcar.Forinstance

Ycar increasedfrom 1.38 to1.86g/kgd.s. (1.3-fold increase)

whenthepressureincreasedfrom6to13MPaat21◦C.Similar behavior was observedfor Ychlor forpressure increases, in

theupperpressurerangeover9.5MPa.Therewasapositive effect of pressure on Ychlor. For instance Ychlor increased

from 10.81 to13.57mg/kg d.s. (1.3-fold increase)when the pressureincreasedfrom9.5to13MPaat21◦C.Forpressures below9.5MPa,thenon-lineareffectofpressure(A22=+1.018)

becomesimportant,andweobservedslightchangesinYchlor

with pressure. Supercritical extractions were performed underconstanttemperatureandpressureconditions, there-forethesolventpowerofCO2shouldnotchangewithinthe

extractionassays. However,microalgaextractsare complex mixtures of several interacting compounds. Probably the effectofquadratictermswouldbeexplainedbytheexistence ofsolute–soluteinteractions (anti-solvencyandco-solvency effects) and/or solute–matrix interactions that affect the solubility behavior of a compound of the mixture in the supercriticalphaseanditsrecoveryyield46(Fig.1).

Cell disruptionstudiesusing CO2 rapiddepressurization

havebeen reportedinliterature.Thecell disruptionof Ral-stoniaeutrophatoextractpoly(␤-hydroxybutyrate)(PHB)was studied.27AmultipurposeSFE-SFCsystemwasusedforthe

celldisruption,anditsefficiencywasmeasuredasPHB recov-ery.Extractionyieldincreasedwithincreasingpressurefrom 15to20MPa,butdecreasedat30MPa.Theauthorsattribute thenegativeeffectofhighpressuretothefactthatdisruption ofthecytoplasmmembraneoccursfasterthandisruptionof thecellwallat30MPa,resultingincellwallshrinkage,which hinderstheextractionofintracellularcompounds.Ina simi-larstudyontherecoveryofPHBfromR.eutrophacells,itwas reportedthatPHBrecoverydecreasedwithincreasingpressure from25to35MPaatconstanttemperature.47Wasstudiedthe

celldisruptionofE.coliusingCO2rapiddepressurizationfor

endoglucanaseenzymerecovery.23Thepressureduringstatic

compression(10–25MPa)hadasignificantpositiveeffecton enzymerecovery.Higherpressureresultedinbetterenzyme recovery. Therefore, the positive effect of pressure during static compressiononcell disruptionhasbeen observedat pressuresbelow20MPa.Withrespecttothecompression tem-perature, Hejazi et al.27 reported that biopolymer recovery

decreasedwhenthecompressiontemperaturerosefrom40 to70◦C.Theauthorsattributedthiseffecttothesupercritical CO2beingclosertoitsliquidstateatlowertemperatures:when

rapiddepressurizationoccurs,theCO2reachesitsgasstate

withmaximumvolumechange,whichinturncausesmore extensivecell walldisruption. Also,Khosravi-Daranietal.47

reportedthatPHBrecoverydecreasedwithincreasing temper-aturefrom30to40◦Catconstantpressure.Thusanegative effectoftemperatureduringstaticcompressiononcell dis-ruptionusingrapiddepressurizationhasbeenobserved.

Table3–ComparisonofsupercriticalCO2extraction(40Cand30MPa)betweenmicroalgaeuntreatedandpretreated

withrapiddecompression(21Cand13MPa).

Characteristics Untreated Pretreated Foldincrease

Oilextractionyield(g/kgd.s.) 76.97±1.51a 82.37±0.90b 1.07

Concentration(mg/kgoil) Carotenoids 17.02±0.93a 19.75±0.78b 1.16 Chlorophylls 19.36±1.68a 181.26±3.62b 9.36 Tocopherols 8509±55a 9059±39b 1.06 Extractionyield Carotenoids(g/kgd.s.) 1.53±0.15a 1.91±0.09b 1.25 Tocopherols(g/kgd.s.) 0.91±0.01a 1.04±0.01b 1.14 Chlorophylls(mg/kgd.s.) 1.38±0.35a 14.03±0.91b 10.2

Antioxidantactivity(mmolTE/kgoil) 29.11±0.51a 33.22±0.31b 1.14

(7)

Accordingtoourresults,theextractionofcarotenoidswas best at 21◦C and 13MPa with Ycar at 1.87g/kg d.s., while

theextraction ofchlorophyll was bestat32◦Cand 13MPa, with Ychlor at 15.45mg/kg d.s. In other words higher

pig-mentextractionwasobtainedintheexperimentalrangeof highpressure and lowtemperature, whichagreeswiththe observationsofpreviousauthors.23,27,47Thisrangeis

charac-terizedbyhigherCO2 density (about810–880kg/m3).When

the CO2 isdenser,its solvent power increasesand in

con-sequence sodoes the permeation capability ofCO2 within

thecell.Furthermore,whenthe CO2 density increases,the

net amount of gas absorbed into the cells increases and thisincreasestheforce causedbyrapiddepressurization.47

AmajorchangeinthevolumeoccurswhentheCO2returns

to the gaseous state due to rapid depressurization.27 This

suddenvolumechangeresultsinmoreeffectivecell disrup-tionandimprovestheavailabilityofpigmentsbysupercritical extraction.

Comparisonbetweenuntreatedandpretreatedmicroalgae

Table3shows acomparisonofsupercriticalCO2 extraction

(40◦Cand30MPa)usinguntreatedmicroalgaeandmicroalgae pretreatedusingrapiddepressurization.Forrapid depressur-izationpretreatment,weselected21◦Cand13MPaconditions tofavorrecoveryofcarotenoidsandchlorophylls.Thestatic time was kept constant at 60min. The extraction yields forcarotenoidand chlorophyll reportedin Table3 confirm the predictive power of the selected second-order models (Eqs. (4) and (5)). Table 3shows that there was significant difference (p≤0.05) incompound recoveryand antioxidant activity betweenoilsextracted withsupercriticalCO2 from

untreatedandpretreatedsamplesusingrapid depressuriza-tion.Weincludedthe measurementofantioxidant activity andquantifiedtotaltocopherols,whichareimportant antiox-idants.Thehighestdifferencewasobservedintheextraction ofchlorophylls,1.38and14.03mg/kgd.s.,foruntreatedand pretreated samples respectively. Chlorophyll pigments are produced and stored intracellularly in the chloroplasts.48

Mendesetal.37reportedthatinsupercriticalextracts(at40C

and 12.5–30MPa) obtainedfrom freeze-dried samples ofB. braunii,chlorophyllswerenotdetected.Therefore,thehigher extractionofchlorophyllsfrompretreatedsampleswithrapid depressurizationwouldbeaverygoodindicatorofcell disrup-tion.Tosupporttheseresults,observationsweremadeunder confocallasermicroscopy.

ConfocalmicroscopyimagesinFig.2showtheeffectofCO2

rapiddepressurization pretreatment on the morphology of microalgaecells.Fig.2Ashowsamicro-colonyofB.brauniinot treatedwithrapiddepressurizationascontrolsample.Intact cellwallscanstillbedistinguishedinthemicro-colony.Thisis clearwhenweobservethewallssurroundingthecellsstained blue(emission450nm),duetothereactionofcalcofluorwith thecellulosecomponentsofthecellwall.Fig.2Bshowsmajor destruction ofcellwalls inthe micro-colony towhichCO2

rapiddepressurization wasapplied:largecell wallintegrity waslost.Cellunitsarenotclearlydifferentiated,sincesome cellshavefusedtogether.Inaddition,redareasappeardue toanincreaseinthereleaseofchlorophyllpigments (emis-sion650–750nm),which wouldpermithigher extractionof

A

B

Intac cell wall

Partial cell disruption Release of chlorophylls

Fig.2–Confocalmicroscopyimagesofmicro-colonyofB.

braunii:(A)nottreatedwithCO2rapiddepressurization,as

controlsampleand(B)treatedwithrapiddepressurization

(bar=20␮m).

chlorophyllpigmentswithsupercriticalCO2ascomparedto

thecontrolsample(withouttreatmentwithrapid depressur-ization).Therewasthereforeanobservabledifferenceincell wall integrity between the untreated and pretreated sam-ples, whichresultedinincreasedextractionofcarotenoids, chlorophyllsandtocopherols,andinhigherantioxidant activ-ity in pretreatedsamples. These observations suggest that pretreatment using CO2 rapid depressurization improved

pigment extraction due to partial cell disruption of the microalgae.

(8)

Conclusions

ThisworkinvestigatedcelldisruptionusingCO2rapid

depres-surizationasasubstratepretreatmentforpigmentextraction from the microalga B. braunii. According to the response surfaceswe suggest aregion oflowtemperature and high pressureforthestaticcompressioncondition,whichfavors the extraction of carotenoids and especially chlorophylls. The combination of high pressure (13MPa) and low tem-perature(21◦C)duringstatic compression wasselected for the pretreatment ofmicroalgaewith purposesof compari-sonwithuntreatedmicroalgae.Oilfrompretreatedmicroalgae presentedbetterantioxidantactivityduetothehigher con-centrationofcarotenoids,chlorophyllsandtocopherols.From confocalmicroscopyimages,itwasobservedthatpartialcell disruptionofmicroalgaeimprovedpigmentextraction.CO2

rapiddepressurizationisasimpleandefficientmethodthat canbeemployedtorecoverimportantintracellular compo-nents,suchasthe pigmentsfrom B.braunii.Moreover,this pretreatmentisperformedatmoderatetemperatureswhich wouldprotecttheseheatsensitivecompounds.Thisisthefirst reportoncelldisruptionusingCO2rapiddepressurizationof

amicroalga.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

Acknowledgments

ThisresearchwasfundedbytheUniversidaddeLaFrontera (project DI11-0055) and Innova-CORFO (project 09CTEI-6860).OuracknowledgmentstoAgriaquacultureNutritional GenomicCenter,CGNA(R10C1001).

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1. Iba ˜nezE,CifuentesA.Benefitsofusingalgaeasnatural

sourcesoffunctionalingredients.JSciFoodAgric.

2013;93:703–709.

2. MetzgerP,RagerMN,FosseC.Braunicetals:acetalsfrom

condensationofmacrocyclicaldehydesandterpenediolsin

Botryococcusbraunii.Phytochemistry.2008;69:2380–2386.

3. SamoriC,TorrC,SamoriG,etal.Extractionofhydrocarbons

frommicroalgaBotryococcusbrauniiwithswitchablesolvents.

BioresourTechnol.2010;101:3274–3279.

4. LargeauC,CasadevallE,BerkaloffC,DhamliencourtP.Sites

ofaccumulationandcompositionofhydrocarbonsin

Botryococcusbraunii.Phytochemistry.1980;19:1043–1051.

5. SatoY,ItoY,OkadaS,MurakamiM,AbeH.Biosynthesisof

thetriterpenoids,botryococcenesandtetramethylsqualene

intheBraceofBotryococcusbrauniiviathenon-mevalonate

pathway.TetrahedronLett.2003;44:7035–7037.

6. GrungM,MetzgerP,Liaaen-JensenS.Algalcarotenoids,

primaryandsecondarycarotenoidsintworacesofgreen

algaBotryococcusbraunii.BiochemSysEco.1989;17:263–269.

7. RaoAR,SaradaR,RavishankarGA.Enhancementof

carotenoidsingreenalgaBotryococcusbrauniiinvarious

autotrophicmediaunderstressconditions.IntJBiomed

PharmaceutSci.2010;5:87–92.

8.VolovaTG,KalachevaGS,ZhiloNO,PlotnicovVF.

Physiologicalandbiochemicalpropertiesofthealga

Botryococcusbraunii.RussJPlantPhysiol.1998;45:775–779.

9.RaoAR,SaradaR,BaskaranV,RavishankarGA.Antioxidant

activityofBotryococcusbrauniiextractelucidatedinvitro

models.JAgricFoodChem.2006;54:4593–4599.

10.WeissTL,RothR,GoodsonC,etal.Colonyorganizationin

thegreenalgaBotryococcusbraunii(RaceB)isspecifiedbya

complexextracellularmatrix.EukaryoticCell.

2012;11:1424–1440.

11.RyckeboschE,MuylaertK,FoubertI.Optimizationofan

analyticalprocedureforextractionoflipidsfrommicroalgae.

JAmOilChemSoc.2012;89:189–198.

12.DouchaJ,Livansk ´yK.Influenceofprocessingparameterson

disintegrationofChlorellacellsinvarioustypesof

homogenizers.ApplMicrobiolBiot.2008;81:431–440.

13.LeeJ,YooC,JunS,AhnC,OhH.Comparisonofseveral

methodsforeffectivelipidextractionfrommicroalgae.

BioresourTechnol.2010;101:S75–S77.

14.GerkenHG,DonohoeB,KnoshaugEP.Enzymaticcellwall

degradationofChlorellavulgarisandothermicroalgaefor

biofuelsproduction.Planta.2013;237:239–253.

15.HalimR,RupasingheTWT,TullDL,WebleyPA.Mechanical

celldisruptionforlipidextractionfrommicroalgalbiomass.

BioresourTechnol.2013;140:53–63.

16.BillerP,FriedmanC,RossAB.Hydrothermalmicrowave

processingofmicroalgaeasapre-treatmentandextraction

techniqueforbio-fuelsandbioproducts.BioresourTechnol.

2013;136:188–195.

17.PrabakaranP,RavindranAD.Acomparativestudyon

effectivecelldisruptionmethodsforlipidextractionfrom

microalgae.LettApplMicrobiol.2011;53:150–154.

18.GeciovaJ,BuryD,JelenP.Methodsfordisruptionofmicrobial

cellsforpotentialuseinthedairyindustry–areview.Int

DairyJ.2002;12:541–553.

19.ChistiY,Moo-YoungM.Disruptionofmicrobialcellsfor

intracellularproducts.EnzymeMicrobTechnol.1986;8:194–204.

20.CastorTP,HongGT.Supercriticalfluiddisruptionofand extractionfrommicrobialcells.US5380826A;1995.

21.GasparF,LuT,SantosR,Al-DuriB.Modellingtheextraction

ofessentialoilswithcompressedcarbondioxide.JSupercrit

Fluids.2003;25:247–260.

22.NakamuraK,EnomotoA,FukushimaH,NagaiK,HakodaM.

Disruptionofmicrobialcellsbytheflashdischargeof

high-pressurecarbondioxide.BiosciBiotechBiochem.

1994;58:1297–1301.

23.JuhászT,SzékelyE,SimándiB,SzengyelZ,RéczeyK.

Recoveryofarecombinantthermostableendoglucanase

fromE.coliusingsupercriticalcarbondioxidecelldisruption.

ChemBiochemEngQ.2003;17:131–134.

24.Khosravi-DaraniK,MozafariMR.Supercriticalfluids

technologyinbioprocessindustries:areview.JBiochemTech.

2009;2:144–152.

25.LinHM,YangZ,ChenLF.Animprovedmethodfordisruption

ofmicrobialcellswithpressurizedcarbondioxide.Biotechnol

Prog.1992;8:165–166.

26.Debs-LoukaE,LoukaN,AbrahamG,GhabotV,AllafK.Effect

ofcompressedcarbondioxideonmicrobialcellviability.Appl

EnvironMicrob.1999;65:626–631.

27.HejaziP,Vasheghani-FarahaniE,YaminiY.Supercriticalfluid

disruptionofRalstoniaeutrophaforpoly(-hydroxybutyrate)

recovery.BiotechnolProg.2003;19:1519–1523.

28.LinHM,ChanECh,ChenCh,ChenLF.Disintegrationofyeast

cellsbypressurizedcarbondioxide.BiotechnolProg.

1991;7:201–204.

29.IsenschmidA,MarisonIW,vonStockarU.Theinfluenceof

pressureandtemperatureofcompressedCO2onthe

(9)

30.GuoliangL,JunyouS,YouruiS,etal.SupercriticalCO2cell

breakingextractionofLyciumbarbarumseedoiland

determinationofitschemicalcompositionbyHPLC/APCI/MS

andantioxidantactivity.LWT-FoodSciTechnol.

2011;44:1172–1178.

31.XuX,SunL,DongJ,ZhangH.Breakingthecellsofrapebee

pollenandconsecutiveextractionoffunctionaloilwith

supercriticalcarbondioxide.InnovFoodSciEmergTechnol.

2009;10:42–46.

32.UquicheE,HuertaE,SandovalA,delValleJM.Effectofboldo

(PeumusboldusM.)pretreatmentonkineticsofsupercritical

CO2extractionofessentialoil.JFoodEng.2012;109:230–237.

33.JohnsonLA.Theoretical,comparative,andhystorical

analysisofalternativetechnologiesforoilseedsextraction.

In:WanPJ,WakelinPJ,eds.TechnologyandSolventsfor

ExtractingOilseedsandNonpretroleumOils.Champaign,IL:

AOCSPress;1997:4–47.

34.UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency.http://

www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/nata2002/tables.html.AccessedJan,

2014.

35.BrunnerG.GasExtraction.AnIntroductiontoFundamentalsof

SupercriticalFluidsandtheApplicationtoSeparationProcesses.

NewYork,NY:Springer;1994.

36.delValleJM,AguileraJM.ExtracciónconCO2aaltapresión.

Fundamentosyaplicacionesenlaindustriadealimentos.

FoodSciTechnolInt.1999;5:1–24.

37.MendesRL,FernandesHL,CoelhoJAP,CabralJMS,Palabra

AMF,NovaisJM.Supercriticalcarbondioxideextractionof

hydrocarbonsfromthemicroalgaBotryococcusbraunii.JAppl

Phycol.1994;6:289–293.

38.SantanaA,JesusS,LarrayozMA,FilhoRM.Supercritical

carbondioxideextractionofalgallipidsforthebiodiesel

production.ProcediaEng.2012;42:1755–1761.

39.FiedorJ,BurdaK.Potentialroleofcarotenoidsas

antioxidantsinhumanhealthanddisease.Nutrients.

2014;6:466–488.

40.HsuCY,ChaoPY,HuSP,YangCM.Theantioxidantandfree

radicalscavengingactivitiesofchlorophyllsand

pheophytins.FoodNutrSci.2013;4:1–8.

41.GerdeJ,Montalbo-LomboyM,LinxingY,GrewellD,TongW.

Evaluationofmicroalgaecelldisruptionbyultrasonic

treatment.BioresourTechnol.2012;125:175–181.

42.BazaesJ,SepulvedaC,AciénG,etal.Outdoorpilot-scale

productionofBotryococcusbrauniiinpanelreactors.JAppl

Phycol.2012;24:1353–1360.

43.WrolstadRE,AcreeTE,DeckerEA,etal.HandbookofFood

AnalyticalChemistry:Pigments,Colorants,Flavours,Texture,and BioactiveFoodComponents.Hoboken,NJ:JohnWiley&Sons,

Inc;2005.

44.WongML,TimmsRE,GohEM.Colorimetricdeterminationof

totaltocopherolsinpalmoil,oleinandstearin.JAmOilChem

Soc.1988;65:258–261.

45.PellegriniN,SerafiniM,ColombiB,etal.Totalantioxidant

capacityofplantfoods,beveragesandoilsconsumedinItaly

assessedbythreein-vitroassays.JNutr.2003;133:2812–2819.

46.delValleJM,UrregoFA.Freesolutecontentand

solute-matrixinteractionsaffectapparentsolubilityand

apparentsolutecontentinsupercriticalCO2extractions.A

hypothesispaper.JSupercritFluids.2012;66:157–175.

47.Khosravi-DaraniK,Vasheghani-FarahaniE,ShojaosadatiSA,

YaminiY.Effectofprocessvariablesonsupercriticalfluid

disruptionofRalstoniaeutrophacellsfor

poly(R-hydroxybutyrate)recovery.BiotechnolProg.

2004;20:1757–1765.

48.GranickS.Biosynthesisofchlorophyllandrelatedpigments.

Referências

Documentos relacionados