• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Updated angiosperm family tree for analyzing phylogenetic diversity and community structure

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "Updated angiosperm family tree for analyzing phylogenetic diversity and community structure"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texto

Loading

Imagem

Table 1. Families in R20160415.new that are not included in APG IV, and their phylogenetic positions as indicated by APG III (2009).
Table 2. Corrections to the age estimates of the corresponding nodes in ‘ages’ files due to misleading information in Bell et al
Figure 1.  Community trees for the Forest of Seu Nico Dynamics Plot (A, dated by exponential distribution from Bell et al
Figure 2.  Correlations among the phylogenetic diversity (MPD is mean pairwise distance, MNTD is mean nearest neighbor distance,  PD is phylogenetic diversity) and measures of phylogenetic community structure (NRI is net relatedness index, NTI is nearest t

Referências

Documentos relacionados

A igualdade entre homens, mulheres e escravos era, assim, menos encarada por Platão como um direito do que como um meio de melhorar o governo da cidade. Historicamente, o segundo

5.5 MAC-MPRR protocol: optimal values of w and p for different number of nodes, as well as the optimal throughput, the average number of nodes successfully transmitting an RTS packet,

Table 2 – Mean numbers of productive nodes, number of leaves, and distance between nodes in branches located in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of coffee cultivars, in subplots

Face às mais recentes orientações publicadas, sobre a melhor evidência científica para sustentar e guiar as equipas que prestam cuidados perioperatórios a clientes idosos

done between track analysis and phylogeny of the studied group is important as the generalized tracks and biogeographical nodes formed by phylogenetically-related species are

The proposed model is represented by a weighted semantic network composed of two kinds of nodes – one for presenting the concepts (concept nodes) and the other for

As some methods are more sensitive to variation in deeper phylogenetic nodes (COMDIST) while others capture variation mostly associated with shallower nodes (COMDISTNT, UniFrac

ML methods of ancestral state reconstruction treat the character states at internal nodes of the tree as parameters and attempt to find the parameter values that maximize