Referências
AMADORI, Carlos E. 2001. Semiótica, signos e in-terfaces. Dissertação de Mestrado, Programa de Estudos Pós -Graduados em Comunica-ção e Semiótica, PUC -SP.
ANDERSON, Michael & ARMEN, Cris 1998. “Dia-grammatic reasoning and color”. In: The Diagrammatic Reasoning Site [originalmente publicado em Proceedings of the 1998 AAAI Fall Symposium on Formalization of Reaso-ning with Visual and Diagrammatic Represen-tations]. Disponível em <uhavax.hartford. edu/Diagrams>, <www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/gal/ Diagrams>
ANDERSON, Michael & McCARTNEY, R. 1995. “Diagrammatic reasoning and color”. In: The Diagrammatic Reasoning Site [original-mente publicado em Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial In-telligence]. Disponível em <uhavax.hartford. edu/Diagrams>, <www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/gal/ Diagrams>
APEL, Karl -Otto 1995. Charles Peirce: from pragma-tism to pragmaticism. Amherst: Prometheus Books,
ATÃ, P. & QUEIROZ, J. 2014. “Iconicity in Peircean Situated Cognitive Semiotics”. In: Thellef-sen, T. & SørenThellef-sen, B. (eds.). Charles Sanders Peirce in His Own Words – 100 Years of Semio-tics, Communication and Cognition: 527-536. Berlin: Walter de Grouyter.
BALAT, Michel 1990. “Type, Trace, Ton, le ‘ton’ peircien”. Semiosis 57 -58: 81 -87.
______ 2000. Des fondaments sémiotiques de la psycha-nalyse. Montreal: L’Harmattan Inc.
BARWISE, Jon & ETCHEMENDY, John 1994. Hyperproof. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
BERGMAN, Mats & QUEIROZ, João. (eds.) 2014 The Commens Encyclopedia – The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies (New Edition). http://www.commens.org/encyclopedia BLACKBURN, Simon 1996. The Oxford dictionary
of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BLACKWELL, Alan F. (ed.) 2001. Thinking with diagrams. New York: Kluwer Academic. BORGES, Priscila M. 2010. Mensagens cifradas: a
construção de linguagens diagramáticas. Tese de Doutorado, Programa de Estudos Pós--Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica da PUC -SP.
BOUNFORD, Trevor 2000. Digital diagrams: how to design and present statistical information effecti-vely. New York: Watson -Guptill.
BRUNNING, Jacqueline 1997. “Genuine triads and teridentity”. In: Houser, N.; Roberts, D. & Van Evra, J. (eds.). Studies in the Logic of Char-les S. Peirce: 252 -270. Bloomington: Indiana University.
BURCH, Robert W. 1991. A peircean reduction the-sis: the foundations of topological logic [= Phi-lisophical inquiries 1]. Lubbock: Texas Tech University.
______ 1997. “Peirce’s reduction thesis”. In: In: Hou-ser, N.; Roberts, D. & Van Evra, J. (eds.). Studies in the Logic of Charles S. Peirce: 234 -251. Bloomington: Indiana University.
CATO, John 2001. User -centered web design. Boston: Addison Wesley.
CHANDRASEKARAN, B.; GLASGOW, Janice & NARAYANAN, N. Hari (eds.) 1995. Diagram-matic reasoning: cognitive and computational perspectives. Cambridge: MIT.
CHAUVIRÉ, Christiane 1995. Peirce et la significa-tion - introducsignifica-tion à la logique du vague. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
COLAPIETRO, Vincent 1993. Glossary of semiotics. New York: Paragon House.
De TIENNE, A. 1992. “Peirce’s semiotic monism”. In: Borbé, T. (ed.). Semiotics Unfolding: Proce-edings of the Second Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies. Berlin: Mouton. De WAAL, Cornelis 2001. On Peirce [The Wadsworth
philosophers series]. Belmont: Wadsworth. DEELY, John 1990. Basics of semiotics. Bloomington:
Indiana University Press.
DELEDALLE, Gerard 1990. Lire Peirce aujourd’hui. Paris: De Boeck Université.
DELEDALLE, Gerard & Réthoré, Joëlle 1979. Théo-rie et pratique du signe: introduction à la sémio-tique de Charles S. Peirce. Paris: Payot. FARIAS, Priscila 2001a. “Construindo diagramas
dinâmicos para as classes de signos de Peirce”. IV Jornada do Centro de Estudos Peir-ceanos do COS/PUC -SP.
______ 2001b. “Interactive diagrams for Charles Peirce’s classifications of signs”. In: Quei-roz, J. (ed.). The Digital Encyclopedia of Charles S. Peirce, disponível em <http://www.digi-talpeirce.fee.unicamp.br/>.
______ 2002. Sign design, ou o design dos signos: a construção de diagramas dinâmicos das classes de signos de C. S. Peirce. Tese de doutorado, Programa de Estudos Pós -Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica, PUC -SP.
______ 2005. “Images, diagrams and metaphors: a contribution from semiotics to information design”. In: Spinillo, C. G. & Coutinho, S. G. (eds.). Selected Readings of the Information Design International Conference 2003: 71 -78. Recife: SBDI – Sociedade Brasileira de Design da In-formação.
______ 2008. “O conceito de diagrama na semió-tica de Charles S. Peirce”. Tríades em Revista 1(1): 1 -13.
______ 2014. “Visualizing Reason”. In: Thellef-sen T. & SørenThellef-sen, B. (eds.). Charles Sanders Peirce in his own words: 100 years of semiotics, communication and cognition: 483 -486. Ber-lin: Walter De Gruyter.
FARIAS, Priscila & QUEIROZ, João 2000a. “Notes for a dynamic diagram of Charles Peirce’s clas-sifications of signs”. Semiotica 131 -1/2: 19 -44. ______ 2000b. “Sign design: semiótica aplicada
ao design e design aplicado à semiótica”. P&D Design 2000 – 4º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design vol. 2: 1047 -1054. Rio de Janeiro: AEnd -BR/Estu-dos em Design.
______ 2000c. “On a diagrammatic method for the understanding of Peirce’s 10, 28, and 66 classes of signs”. VIIth International Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Stu-dies. Dresden: IASS.
______ 2000d. “Sign Design: new strategies for the vi-sualization of sign processes and structures”. VIIth International Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies. Dresden: IASS. ______ 2001. “Sign Design: nuevas estrategias para
modelar procesos y estructuras signicas”. Signa 10: 127 -147.
______ 2003. “On diagrams for Peirce’s 10, 28, and 66 classes of signs”. Semiotica 147 (1/4): 165-184.
______ 2004. “10cubes and 3N3: Using interactive diagrams to investigate Charles Peirces clas-sifications of signs”. Semiotica 151 (1/4): 41 -63. ______ 2006. “Images, diagrams, and metaphors:
hypoicons in the context of Peirce’s sixty--six -fold classification of signs”. Semiotica 162 (1/4): 287 -308.
______ 2009. “Hypoicons in the context of Peirce’s extended theory of signs”. In: Smith, B. & Prewitt, T. J. (eds.). Semiotics 2006 -2007: 61--72. Ottawa: Legas.
______ 2014. “On Peirce’s visualization of the clas-sifications of signs: finding a common pat-tern in diagrams”. Charles Sanders Peirce in his own words: 100 years of semiotics, commu-nication and cognition: 527 -536. Berlin: Wal-ter De GruyWal-ter.
FISCH, Max 1986. Peirce, semeiotic, and pragmatism. Boomington: Indiana University Press. FLOWER, Elizabeth & MURPHEY, Murray G. 1977.
A History of philosophy in America. Vol. II. New York: Capricorn Books.
FREADMAN, Anne 1996. “Peirce’s second classifi-cation of signs”. In: Colapietro, V. M. & Ol-shewsky, T. M. (eds.). Peirce’s doctrine of signs: theory, applications, and connections: 143 -159. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
______ 2001a. “The Classifications of Signs (I): 1867 – 1885”. In: Bergman, M. & Queiroz, J. (eds.). The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digi-tal Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies. Disponível em <http://www.commens.org/encyclope-dia/article/freadman -anne -classifications--signs -i -1867 -1885>.
______ 2001b. “The Classifications of Signs (II): 1903”. In: Bergman, M. & Queiroz, J. (eds.). The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digi-tal Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies. Disponível em <http://www.commens.org/encyclope-dia/article/freadman -anne -classifications--signs -ii -1903>.
______ 2004. The machinery of talk. Charles Peirce and the sign hypothesis. Stanford: Stanford Uni-versity.
FREEMAN, Eugene 1934. The categories of Charles Peirce. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Company.
FRIGG, Roman & HARTMANN, Stephan 2006. “Models in science”. In: Stanford Encyclope-dia of Philosophy. Disponível em <http://pla-to.stanford.edu/entries/models -science/>. GAVA, Gabriele 2016. “Prescission”. In
Berg-man, M. & Queiroz, J. (eds.). The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peir-ce Studies. New Edition. Pub. 161017 -1124a. Disponível em <http://www.commens. org/encyclopedia/article/gava -gabriele--prescission>.
HAREL, David 1995. “On visual formalisms”. In: Glasgow, J.; Narayanan N. H. & Chandra-senkaran, B. (ed.): Diagrammatic reasoning: 235 -271. Cambridge: AAAI.
HAUSMAN, Carl R. 1993. Charles S. Peirce’s evolutionary philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University. HERETH, Joachim & PÖSCHEL, Reinhard 2011.
“Peircean algebraic logic and Peirce’s re-duction thesis”. Semiotica 186 (1/4): 141 -167. HERZBERGER, Hans 1981. “Peirce’s remarkable
theorem”. In: Sumner, L. W.; Slater, J.G. & Wilson, F. (eds.). Pragmatism and purpose: essays presented to Thomas A. Goudge: 41 -58. Toronto: University of Toronto.
HOFFMANN, Michael 2001. “The 1903 classifica-tion of triadic sign -relaclassifica-tions”. In: Queiroz, J. (ed.). The Digital Encyclopedia of Charles S. Peirce, J. Queiroz (ed.), disponível em <http://www.digitalpeirce.fee.unicamp. br/>.
HOOKWAY, Christopher 1985. Peirce. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
______ 2002. Truth, rationality, and pragmatism: the-mes from Peirce. Oxford: Oxford University. HOUSER, Nathan 1991. “A Peircean classification
of models”. In: Anderson, M. & Merrell, F. (eds.). On semiotic modeling: 431 -439. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
______ 1992. “On Peirce’s theory of propositions: a response to Hilpinen”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 23 (3): 489 -504. ______ 1997. “Introduction: Peirce as a logician”.
In: Houser, N.; Roberts, D. & Van Evra, J. (eds.). Studies in the Logic of Charles S. Peirce: 1 -22. Bloomington: Indiana University. ______ 2010. “Peirce, phenomenology, and
semio-tics”. In: Cobley, P. (ed.). The routledge compa-nion to semiotics: 89–100. London: Routledge. IM, Yun Jung 1998. “Semiótica para cursos de de-sign”. P&D Design 1998 - 3º Congresso Brasi-leiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design vol. 1: 170 -176. Rio de Janeiro: AEnd -BR/ Estudos em Design.
JAPPY, Antony 1984. “Peirce’s third trichotomy and two cases of sign path analysis”. Se-miotica 49 (1/2): 15 -26.
______ 1985. “‘Beauty’: sign -systems that work”. In: Kodikas/Code Ars Semeiotica 8 (1/2): 111--120.
______ 1989. “Peirce’s sixty -six signs revisited”. In: Deledalle, G. (ed.). Semiotics and Pragmatics (= Proceedings of the Perpignan Symposium on Semiotics and Pragmatics 1983): 143 -153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
______ 2004. Iconicity, Hypoiconicity. In M. Berg-man & J. Queiroz (Eds.), The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peir-ce Studies. New Edition. Pub. 131013 -1954a. disponível em http://www.commens. org/encyclopedia/article/jappy -antony--iconicity -hypoiconicity.
JOHANSEN, J. D. 1993. Dialogic semiosis. Indiana University Press.
______ 1999. A diagrammatic modeling of semio-sis. Semiotica 126 (1/4): 41 -73.
KENT, Beverley 1987. Charles S. Peirce: logic and the classification of the sciences. Montreal: McGill -Queens University.
______ 1997. “The interconnectedness of Peirce’s diagrammatic thought”. In: Houser, N.; Roberts, D. & Van Evra, J. (ed.). Studies in the Logic of Charles S. Peirce: 445 -459. Blooming-ton: Indiana University.
KETNER, Kenneth L. 1981. “The best example of semiosis and its use in teaching semiotics”. American Journal of Semiotics 1 (1/2): 47 -83. ______ 1986. “Peirce’s ‘most lucid and interesting
paper’: an introduction to cenopythagore-anism”. International Phylosophical Quarterly 26 (4): 375 -392.
______ 1995. A Thief of Peirce - The letters of Kenneth L. Ketner and Walker Percy (Samway, P., ed.). Jackson: University Press of Mississippi. LIEB, Irwin C. 1977. “Appendix B”. In: Hardwick,
C. S. (ed.). Semiotics and significs: the corres-pondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby: 161 -166. Bloomington: Indiana University.
LISZKA, James 1996. A general introduction to the semeiotic of Charles S. Peirce. Bloomington: Indiana University.
MARÓSTICA, Ana H. 1992. “Ars Combinatoria and time: LLull, Leibniz and Peirce”. Studia Llulliana 32: 105 -134.
MARTY, Robert 1982a. “C. S. Peirce’s phanerosco-py and semiotics”. Semiotica 41 (1/4): 169--181.
______ 1982b. “Le treillis des 28 classes de signes hexadiques”. Semiosis 25 -26: 1 -12.
______ 1990. L’algèbre des signes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
______ 1997. 76 Definitions of The Sign by C. S. Peirce. In: J. Ransdell (ed.). Arisbe. Disponível em <members.door.net/arisbe/menu/library/ rsources/76defs/76defs.htm>
MERRELL, Floyd 1991. “Thought -signs, sign--events”. Semiotica 87 (1/2): 1 -58.
______ 1996. Signs grow: semiosis and life proces-ses. Toronto: University of Toronto. ______ 1997. Peirce, signs and meaning. Toronto:
Uni-versity of Toronto.
MÜLLER, Ralf 1994. “On the principles of cons-truction and the order of Peirce’s trichoto-mies of signs”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30, 1: 135 -153.
MURPHEY, Murray G. 1993. The development of Peirce’s philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University.
NAUTA, Doede 1981. “Peirce’s three categories regained: toward an interdisciplinary re-construction of peircean frameworks”. In: Ketner, K. et al. (ed.). Proceedings of the Peirce Bicentenial International Congress. Lubbock: Texas Tech.
NÖTH, Winfried 1995. Handbook of semiotics. Bloo-mington: Indiana University.
OLSEN, Len 1999. “On Peirce’s systematic division of signs”. (manuscrito)
OWEN, Charles L. 1998. “Design, advanced plan-ning and product development”. In: P&D Design 98 – 3º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design vol. 1. Rio de Ja-neiro: AEnd -BR/Estudos em Design. PAAVOLA, Sami 2011. “Diagrams, iconicity, and
ab-ductive discovery”. Semiotica 186 (1/4): 297 -314. PAPE, Helmut 1993. “Final causality in Peirce’s
semiotic and his classification of the sciences”. Transactions of C.S.Peirce Society. XXIX (4):581 -608.
______ 1997. “The logical structure of idealism: C. S. Peirce’s search for a logic of mental pro-cesses”. In: Brunning, J. & Forster, P. (eds.). The rule of reason: 153 -184. Toronto: Univer-sity of Toronto.
PARKER, Kelly 1998. The continuity of Peirce’s thought. Nashville: Vanderbilt University.
PEIRCE, Charles S. 1976. New Elements of Mathematics by Charles S. Peirce (C. Eisele, ed.). The Hague: Mouton. [Obra citada como NEM, seguido pelo número do volume e número da página] ______ 1977. Semiotics and significs: the corresponden-ce between Charles S. Peircorresponden-ce and Victoria Lady Welby (C. S. Hardwick, ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University. [Obra citada como SS, seguido pelo número do volume e número da página]
______ 1982 -2000 [1839 -1914]. Writings of Charles S. Peirce – a cronological edition, Vols. 1 -6. (Peirce Edition Project, ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University. [Obra citada como W, seguido pelo número do volume e número da página] ______ 1994 [1866 -1913]. The collected papers of Char-les S. Peirce. Edição eletrônica reproduzindo Vols. I -VI (C. Hartshorne, & P. Weiss, eds., Cambridge: Harvard University, 1931 -1935), Vols. VII -VIII (A. W. Burks, ed., Cambridge: Harvard University, 1958). Charlottesville, Intelex Corporation. [Obra citada como CP, seguido pelo número do volume e número do parágrafo]
______ 1998 [1893 -1913]. The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings, Vols. 1 -2. (Peirce Edition Project, ed.). Bloomington: Indiana Univer-sity. [Obra citada como EP, seguido pelo nú-mero do volume e núnú-mero da página] QUEIROZ, João 1997. Sobre as 10 classes de signos de
C.S.Peirce. Dissertação de mestrado, Progra-ma de Estudos Pós -Graduados em Comu-nicação e Semiótica, PUC -SP.
______ 2002. Modelos de relações sígnicas na semio-se semio-segundo C. S. Peirce: evidências empírico--teóricas. Tese de doutorado, Programa de Estudos Pós -Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica, PUC -SP.
QUEIROZ, João & MORAES, Lafayette de (eds.) 2013. A lógica de diagramas de C.S.Peirce: im-plicações em ciência cognitiva, lógica e semióti-ca. Juiz de Fora: UFJF.
QUEIROZ, João & STJERNFELT, Frederik (eds.) 2011. “Diagrammatical reasoning and Peir-cean logic representations”. Semiotica 186 (special issue).
QUEIROZ, João 2006. “Introdução à divisão 3 -tricotômica de signos de C. S. Peirce.” Cadernos de Estudos Linguisticos (Instituto de Estudos de Linguagem/UNICAMP), 46 (2): 271 -282.
QUINE, W.V. 1995. “Peirce’s logic”. In: Ketner, K. et al (ed.). Proceeddings of the Charles S. Peir-ce BiPeir-centennial International Congress: 23 -31. Lubbock: Texas Tech.
RANSDELL, Joseph 1983. “Peircean semiotic”. (manuscrito)
______ 1997. “On Peirce’s Conception of the Iconic Sign”. In: Ransdell, J. (ed.). Arisbe. Dispo-nível em <www.door.net/ARISBE/menu/ library/aboutcsp/ransdell/iconic.htm> RASKIN, Jef 2000. The humane interface: new
direc-tions for designing interactive systems. Boston: Addison Wesley.
ROBERTS, Don 1973. The existential graphs of Charles S. Peirce. The Hague: Mouton.
ROBIN, Richard S. 1967. Annotated catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: Univer-sity of Massachusetts. [Referências aos ma-nuscritos e cartas de C.S. Peirce, citados res-pectivamente como MS e L e seguidos pelos números de página, seguem este catálogo] ROMANINI, Anderson Vinícius 2006. Semiótica
minuta - especulações sobre a gramática dos sig-nos e da comunicação a partir da obra de Char-les S. Peirce. Tese de Doutorado, Programa de Pós -Graduação em Ciências da Comu-nicação, ECA USP.
ROSENSTIEHL, Pierre 1988. “Combinatória”. In: Lógica -combinatória [= Enciclopédia Einaudi, vol. 13, R. Romano (ed.)]: 274 -335. Porto: Im-prensa Nacional – Casa da Moeda.
ROSENTHAL, Sandra 1997. “Pragmatic experi-mentalism and the derivation of the cate-gories”. In: Brunning, J. & Forster, P. (eds.). The rule of reason: 120 -138. Toronto: Univer-sity of Toronto.
SANDERS, Gary 1970. “Peirce sixty -six signs?”. Tran-sactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 6 (1): 3 -16. ______ 1995. A teoria geral dos signos: semiose e
auto-geração. São Paulo: Ática.
SANTOS, Flávio A. N. V. 2000. “Uma proposta de metodologia de projeto para uso em cur-sos de design”. In: P&D Design 2000 - 4º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvol-vimento em Design vol. 1: 489 -491. Rio de Janeiro: AEnd -BR/Estudos em Design. SAVAN, David 1977. “Questions concerning
cer-tain classifications claimed for signs”. Se-miotica 19 (3/4): 179 -195.
______ 1987 -1988. “An introduction to C.S.Peirce’s full system of semeiotic”. Monograph Series of the Toronto Semiotic Circle vol. 1.
SERSON, Breno 1997. “On Peirce’s pure grammar as a general theory of cognition: from the thought -sign of 1868 to the semeiotic the-ory of assertion”. Semiotica 113 (1/2): 107 -157. SHIN, Sun -Joo 1995. The logical status of diagrams.
New York: Cambridge University.
SIVASANKARAN, Vijai K. & OWEN, Charles L. 1992. “Data exploration: transposition ope-rations in dynamic diagrams”. Visible Lan-guage 28 (3/4): 451 -473.
SLESS, David 1997. “Transitions in information de-sign: a history”. In: Communication Research Institute of Australia web site, disponível em <http://communication.org.au/transitions--in <http://communication.org.au/transitions--information -design -a -history/> SOWA, John 2001. “Existential Graphs: MS 514 by
Charles Sanders Peirce with commentary by John F. Sowa”. Disponível em <http:// www.jfsowa.com/peirce/ms514.htm> SPINKS, C. W. 1991. “Diagrammatic thinking and
the portraiture of thought”. In: Anderson, M. & Merrell, F. (eds.). On semiotic modeling: 441 -481. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
STJERNFELT, Frederik 2000. “Diagrams as cen-terpiece in a Peircean epistemology”. Tran-sactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36 (3): 357 -92.
______ 2007. Diagrammatology: an investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology and semiotics. New York: Springer.
TURSMAN, Richard 1987. Peirce’s theory of scientific discovery: a system of logic conceived as semio-tics. Bloomington: Indiana University. VILLAS -BOAS, André 1999. O que é e o que nunca foi
design gráfico - the dub remix. Rio de Janeiro: 2AB.
WEINERT, Friedel 1999. “Theories, models and constraints”. Studies in History and Philoso-phy of Science Part A 30 (2): 303 -333. WEISS, Paul & BURKS, Arthur 1945. “Peirce’s
sixty -six signs”. Journal of Philosophy XLII: 383 -388.
ZELLWEGER, Shea 1982. “Sign -creation and man -sign engeneering”. Semiotica 38 (1/2): 17 -54.
______ 1991. “Peirce, iconicity, and the geometry of logic”. In: Anderson, M. & Merrell, F. (eds.). On semiotic modeling: 483 -507. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
______ 1992. “Cards, mirrors, and hand -held mo-dels that lead into elementary logic”. 16th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (manuscrito)
______ 1997a. “On a deep correspondence betwe-en sign -creation in logic and symmetry in cristallography”. In: Rauch, I. & Carr, G. (eds.). Semiotics Around the World: Synthesis in Diversity (= Proceedings of the 5th Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Stu-dies): 821 -824.
______ 1997b. “Untapped potential in Peirce’s ico-nic notation for the sixteen binary con-nectives”. In: Houser, N.; Roberts, D. & Van Evra, J. (eds.). Studies in the Logic of Charles S. Peirce: 334 -386. Bloomington: Indiana University.
