• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rankl expression predicts poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients: results from a retrospective and single-center analysis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "Rankl expression predicts poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients: results from a retrospective and single-center analysis"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texto

Loading

Imagem

Table 2. Spearman ’ s correlation between RANKL and RANK expression in primary gastric cancer patients.
Figure 2. Prognostic signi fi cance of RANKL and RANK expression in gastric cancer (GC) patients
Figure 3C) or III (P=0.075; Figure 3D) groups.
Figure 3. Prognostic signi fi cance of RANKL expression according to different clinicopathological factors in gastric cancer patients.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

surface expression, a higher number and percentage of RANKL- expressing neutrophils in AS patients were found when compared to healthy donors ( p   =  0.0022 and 0.0071,

High expression of Erk1 correlated with age, tumor location, size, depth of invasion, differentiation, Lauren’s classification, lymph node and distant metastases, regional lymph

Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that high-density of CD15 + neutrophils (Figure 2A), strong expression of CEACAM1 (Figure 2B), lymph node metastasis, high clinical stage

In this study, we found that both higher Gal-9 expression and negative Tim-3 expression were significantly associated with better overall survival ( P = 0.002, P = 0.010,

In those patients with FAP expression only in stroma tumors, although tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis corre- lated with FAP overexpression, the overall survival of

reduction in overall survival at three years was observed in patients with greater tumor invasion in the gastric wall, lymph node metastasis, the presence of angiolymphatic invesion

A high snail expression level is also a better prognostic indicator than MIB1 index, because the former predicts poor survival regardless of tumor grade and stage. The

Fascin immunoreactivity scores were signiicantly higher in tumors with lymph node metastasis ( p :0.002) and advanced stage presentation ( p :0.007).. There was no relation