• Nenhum resultado encontrado

PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ANTROPOLOGIA SOCIAL

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ANTROPOLOGIA SOCIAL"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texto

(1)

1 Curso: MNA -704 – Sociedades Camponesas (AS) (M)

Professores: Moacir Palmeira e Beatriz Heredia Nº de Créditos: 03

Período: 1º Semestre de 1985

Horário: 2ª Feira, 14:00 – 17:00 horas Local: Sala de Aula do PPGAS

O curso tem por objetivo familiarizar o aluno com os conceitos básicos manipulados pelos cientistas sociais voltados para o estudo do campesinato, remetendo-o, sempre que possível, às tradições teóricas que lhes servem de suporte. Valendo-se de uma perspectiva comparativa, pretende fornecer o quadro necessário à prática de investigação social.

1ª Sessão: Apresentação do curso.

2ª Sessão: A definição problemática.

REDFIELD, Robert. “Later Histories of the Folk Societies” In: The Primitive World and its Transformations. Middlesex, Penguin Books, 1968, pp.38-63.

FOSTER, George – “What is a Peasant”. In Potter et al.: Peasant Society: a Reader. Boston, Little Brown, 1967, pp.2-14.

SHANIN, Teodor. “Peasantry as a Political Factor”. In ___. Peasants and Peasant Society.

(Harmondsworth), Penguin Books, 1971, pp.238-263.

DALTON, George. “Peasantries in Anthropology and History”. Current Anthropology, vol.13, nº 3-4, june-oct. 1972, pp.385-415.

MINTZ, Sidney – “A note on the definition of Peasantries”. The Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 1, n°1, oct. 1973, pp. 91-106.

SILVERMAN, Sydel – “The Peasant Concept in Anthropologie”. The Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 7, n°1, oct. 1979, pp. 49-69.

QUEIROZ, Maria Isaura Pereira de – “O sitiante tradicional brasileiro e o problema do campesinato”. In ___: O Campesinato Brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro, Vozes, 1976, pp.7-32.

PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ANTROPOLOGIA SOCIAL UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO QUINTA DA BOA VISTA S/N. SÃO CRISTÓVÃO. CEP 20940-040

RIO DE JANEIRO - RJ - BRASIL Tel.: 55 (21) 2568-9642 - fax 55 (21) 2254.6695

www://ppgasmuseu.etc.br e-mail: ppgasmn@gmail.com

(2)

2 3ª Sessão: Comunidades e Aldeia Camponesa.

REDFIELD, Robert – “The little Community as a Whole”. In ___: The little Community and Peasant Society and Culture. London, The University of Chicago Press, 1965. pp. 1-16.

GEERTZ, Clifford. “Form and Variation in Balinese Village Structure”. In Potter et al.

Peasant Society: a Reader. Op. cit., pp.255-278.

Consulta

WOLF, E. – “Closed Corporate Peasant Communities in Mesoamerica and Central Java”

Peasant Society: a Reader. Boston, Little Brown, 1967. pp.230-246.

CHAMPAGNE, Patrick – “La restruturation de l’espace villageois”. Actes de la Recherche, n°3, mar 1975. pp.43-67.

4ª Sessão: Família e grupo doméstico.

BOUQUET, M. and DE HAAN, Henk – “Kinship as an analytical category in rural sociologiy: an introduction”. Sociologia Ruralis. Vol. XXVIII, nº 4, 1987, pp. 243-262.

THOMAS, W. And ZNANIECK, F. – “The Peasant Family” e “Marriage”. In The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. New York, Octagon Books, 1974, vol. 1, pp.87-128.

ARENSBERG, C.M. and KIMBALL, S.T. – “The Small Farm Family in Rural Ireland. In Anderson: Sociology of the Family. Middelesex, Penguin Books, 1971. pp. 19-42.

SEGALEN, M. – “Couple, Menage, Communauté”. In: __. Mari et Femme dans la societé paysanne. (Paris), Flammarion, 1980, pp. 43-85.

Consulta

GOLDSCHIMIDT, Walter and KONKEL, Evelyn J. “The Structure of the Peasant Family”.

American Anthropologist, vol.73, nº7, Oct.1971, pp.1058-1076.

5ª Sessão: Entre o grupo doméstico e a Aldeia.

CAMPBELL, J.K. – “The Kindred in a Greek mountain community”. In Pitt-Rivers:

Mediterranean Countrymen. Paris – La Hage, Mouton and Co. 1963. p.73-96.

FOSTER, George. “The Dyadic Contract: a model for the social structure of a Mexican

peasant village”. In Potter et al.: Peasant Society: a Reader. Boston, Little Brown, 1967,

pp.213-230.

(3)

3 FREEMAN, Susan Tax – “Egalitarian Structures in Iberian Social Systems: The contexts of turn-taking in town and country”. American Ethnologist, Vol. 14, nº 3, agosto 1987, pp. 470-490.

6ª Sessão: Economia camponesa, Grupo doméstico, Cálculo econômico.

FIRTH, Raymond. – “Capital, Saving and Credit in Peasant Society: a viewpoint from economic anthropology”. In ___: Firth, R and Yaney, B.S. (eds.). Capital, Saving and Credit in Peasant Society. Chicago: Aldine, 1964, pp.15-34.

POLANYI, Karl. – “The Economy as an Instituted Process”. In Polanyi et al.: Trade and Market in the Early Empires. New York: The Free Press, 1957, cap.XVI, pp.243-270.

CHAYANOV, A.V. “On the Theory of Non-Capitalist Economic Systems”. In Thorner et al The Theory of Peasant Community. Homewood: Lewin, The American Economic Association. 1966, pp.1-28.

Consulta

TEPICHT, J. – “La Nature de l’Economie Paysanne”. In:__. Marxisme et Agriculture: le paysan polonais. Paris, Armand Colin, 1973, pp. 13-46.

GALESKI, Boguslaw – Basic Concepts of Rural Sociology. Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1972, pp. 9-32.

7ª Sessão: Troca, mercado, praça de mercado.

SAHLINS, Marshall – “On the Sociology of Primitive Exchange”. In Banton The Relevance of Models for Social Anthropology, ASA Monographs 1, London: Tavistock Publications, 1969, pp.139-158.

BOHANNAN, P. and DALTON, G. – “Introduction”. In ___: Markets in Africa, Anchor Books, 1965, pp.1-32.

MINTZ, Sidney – “Men, Women and Trade”. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 13 (3), 1971, pp.247-269.

Consulta

PIAULT, Marc – “Cycles de Marché et ‘Espaces’ Socio-Politiques”. In MEILLASSOUX, C.

(ed.): The Development of Indigenous Trade and Market in West-Africa. London, Oxford

University Press, 1971, pp. 285-302.

(4)

4 8ª Sessão: Propriedade e reprodução da condição camponesa.

BOHANNAN, Paul. – “Land, Tenure and Land Tenure”. In BIEBUYCK (ed.): African Agrarian Systems. London: Oxford University Press, 1963, pp.101-111.

OU

BOHANNAN, Paul. – “African’s Land”. In: Dalton (ed.): Tribal and Peasant Economies.

New York: The Natural History Press, 1967, pp.51-60.

DURRENBERGER, P. and PALSSON, G. – “Ownership at sea: fishing territories and access to sea resources”. American Ethnologist. Vol. 14, nº 3. August 1987, pp. 508-522.

BOURDIEU, Pierre – “Célibat et Condition Paysanne”. Études Rurales, nº5-6, avril-spt., 1962, pp.32-135.

Consulta

FRIELD, Ernestine – “Dowry and Inheritance in Moderne Greece”. In Potter et al.: Peasant Society: a Reader. Op. cit., p.57-62.

CHAMPAGNE, Patrick – “Capital Culturel et patrimoine économique. Le cas de l’agriculture bressane”. Actes de la Recherche, nº 69, sept. 1987, pp. 51-66.

9ª Sessão: Cultura Camponesa I

FOSTER, Georges – “Peasant Society and the Image of Limitated Good”. In POTTER et al.:

Peasant Society: A Reader. Op. Cit., pp.300-321.

REDFIELD, R. “The Social Organization of Tradition. In POTTER et al.: Peasant Society: A Reader. Op. Cit., pp.25-44.

HESPANHA, A.M. – “Sábios e Rústicos: A violência doce da razão jurídica”, Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, nº 25/26, dezembro 1988, pp. 31-60.

TAUSSIG, Michael – “The Genesis of Capitalism amongst a South American peasantry:

Devil’s Labor and the Baptism of Money”. Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 19, nº 2, april 1977, pp. 139-155.

CHAMPAGNE, Patrick – “La fête au village”. Actes de la Recherche, n°17/18, nov 1977.

pp.73-84.

____________________ – “Le paysan à la plage”. Actes de la Recherche, n° 2, mars 1975.

pp.21-24.

10ª Sessão: Cultura Camponesa II.

(5)

5 BOURDIEU, Pierre – “La Société Traditionnelle: Attitude à l’égard du temps et conduit

économique”. Sociologie du Travail, nº 1, 1963, pp.24-44.

BOURDIEU, Pierre – “La Maison kabile ou le Monde Renversé”. In: POUILLON, Jean et MIRANDA, Pierre (eds.): Echanges et Communications, Mélanges offertes à C. Lévi- Strauss à l’occasion de son 60

e

anniversaire. Paris – La Haye, Mouton, 1970, pp. 739-758.

DARNTON, R. - “Histórias que os camponeses contam”. In:__. O Grande Massacre de Gatos. Graal. Rio de Janeiro, 1986, pp. 21-103.

11ª Sessão: Estado, política e campesinato I.

SILVERMAN, Sydel – “The Community-Nation Mediator in Traditional Central Italy”. In POTTER et al.: Peasant Society: A Reader. Op. Cit., pp.279-293.

WOLF, Eric. “Aspects of Groups Relations in a Complex Society: Mexico”. In SHANIN (ed.): Peasants and Peasant Society, Penguin Books, 1971, pp.50-68.

HOBSBAWN, Eric – “Peasants and Politics”. The Journal of Peasant Studies. Vol. 1, nº 1, oct. 1973, pp. 3-22.

MOORE, Barrington. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1967, caps. VII, VIII e IX, pp.403-483.

12ª Sessão: Estado, política e campesinato II.

WOLF, Eric. “On Peasant Rebellions”. In Peasants and Peasant Societies, In SHANIN (ed.):

Peasants and Peasant Society, Op. Cit, pp.264-274.

ALAVI, Hamza. “Paysans et Révolution”. Temps Modernes, ano 28, nº 306, jan. 1962, pp.1026-1072.

SCOTT, J. – “Everyday forms of Peasant Resistence”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol.

13, nº 2, jan. 1986, pp. 5-35.

BIANCO, L. – “Peasants and Revolution: The case of China”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 2, nº 3, abril 1975, pp. 313-335.

13ª Sessão: Campesinato: Persistência e Mudança

KAUTSKY, Karl, - La Cuestión Agrária. Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI, 1974, caps. I e VIII.

GALESKI, Boguslaw – Basic Concepts of Rural Sociology. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1972, caps. 5, 7 e 8, pp. 100-133; 151-206.

TEPICHT, Jerzy – “La nature de l’économie paysanne”. In:__. Marxisme et Agriculture: Le

paysan polonaise. Paris: Armand Colin, 1973, pp. 13-46.

(6)

6 MENDRAS, Henri – La fin des paysans. S/1: Actes Sud/Hubert Nyssen Editeur, 1984, pp.

287-316 (“Conclusion: Futurible”) e 311-354 (“Postface: Vingt ans aprés”).

14ª Sessão: Campesinato, Capitalismo e Cultura

WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel et al. – “Household Structure and Production Processes:

Preliminary theses and findings”. Review, vol. 3, Winter 1982, pp. 437-489.

MINTZ, Sidney – “The So-Called World System: Local iniciative and local response”.

Dialectical Anthropology, Vol. 2, nº 4, November, 1977, pp. 253-270.

WOLF, Eric. – Europe and the People Without History. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1982, pp. 1-23; 354-383; 385-391.

GEERTZ, Clifford – “Culture and Social Change: The Indonesian Case”. Man. Vol. 19, nº 4, Dec. 1984, pp. 511-532.

SAHLINS, Marshall – “Cosmologias do Capitalismo. O Setor Trans-Pacífico do ‘Sistema Mundial’”. Conferência apresentada à XVI Reunião Brasileira de Antropologia. Campinas, 27 a 30 de março de 1988 (mimeo).

ADAMS, Jane H. – “The Decoupling of Farm and Household: Differential Consequences of Capitalist Development on Southern Illinois and Third World Family Farms”. Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 30, nº 3, july, 1988, pp. 453-482.

ASANO-TAMANOI, Mariko – “Farmers, Industries and the State: The Culture of Contract Farming in Spain and Japan”. Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 30, nº 3, july, 1988, pp. 432-452.

ONG, Aihwa – “The production of possession: Spirits and the multinational corporation in Malasya”. American Ethnologist, vol. 15, nº 1, febr 1988, pp. 28-47.

15ª Sessão: Conceito, Imagens e Identidade.

REDFIELD, Robert – “Peasant Society and Culture”. In:__. The Little Community and Peasant Society and Culture. Chicago/London: Phoenix Books, 1965, Caps. 1 e 2, pp. 5-29.

BOURDIEU, Pierre – “Une Classe Objet”. Actes de la Recherche, n°17/18, nov., 1977. pp. 2- 5.

GRIGNON, Claude – “Le Paysan Inclassable”. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, n°4, juillet 1975. pp. 82-87.

RAMBAUD, Placide – “Les Agriculteus Polonais a la Conguete de Leur Identité”. Actes de

la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, n°41, fevrier 1982. pp.47-79.

(7)

7 M O N O G R A F I A S

I.

ARENSBERG, Conrad, M. & KIMBALL, Solon: Family and Community in Ireland.

Cambridge, Mass. Harvard Univiversity Press, 1968.

CAMPBELL, Joseph: Honour, Family and Patronage. New York, Oxford University Press, 1974.

FÉL, Edith and Hofer, Támas: Proper Peasants, Traditional life in a Hungarian Village.

Chicago, Aldine Publishing Company, 1969.

FIRTH, Raymond. Malay Fisherman: Their peasant economy. London, Routledge & Keagan Paul, 1968.

LEWIS, Oscar: Life in a Mexican Village: Tepoztlén restudied. Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1963.

VOGT, Evon: Zinacantan, a Maya Community in the Highlands of Chiapas. Cambridge, Mass., Belknap, 1969.

II.

BOURDIEU, Pierre & SAYAD, Abdelmalek : Le déracinement: la crise de l’agriculture traditionnelle en Algérie. Paris, Minuit, 1964.

DUVIGNAUD, Jean: Chebika; mutations dans une village du Maghreb. Paris, Gallimard, 1968.

FREEMAN, Susan: Neighbors: The social contract in a Castilian hamlet. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1970.

HINTON, William. Faushen; a documentary of Revolution in a Chinese Village. NewYork, Vintage Books, 1966.

SCOTT, Lamer C.: The moral economy of the peasant rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1976.

SHANIN. The ackward class, political sociology of peasantry in a developing society Russia 1919-1925. Oxford, Clarendon, 1972.

TAUSSIG, M.: The devil and commodity fetishism in South America. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press, 1980.

WARMAN, Arturo: Y Venimos a contradecir. México, Ed. De la Casa Chata, 1978.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

REDFIELD, Robert - Peasant Society and Culture (In: The Little Community and Peasant Society and Culture).. Chicago, The University of Chicago

REDFIELD, Robert - Peasant Society and Culture (In: The Little Community and Peasant Society and Culture).. In Gifts and

As obras de Karl Marx, Weber, Émile Durkheim e Marcel Mauss são tanto associadas a um momento constituidor do “social” como um campo de saber científico como as tradições de

REDFIELD, Robert - Peasant Society and Culture (In: The Little Community and Peasant Society and Culture).. Chicago, The University of Chicago

Mais detalhes ou alternativas serão apresentados no final da terceira semana ou no ínicio da quarta.. Gluckman, Max- “Les Rites de Passage”, in Essays on the Ritual of

“The Dyadic Contract: a model for the social structure of a Mexican peasant village”.. In Potter et al.: Peasant Society:

Como os dois cursos anteriores dados sobre o mesmo assunto em 1979 e 1980, o presente curso tem por objetivo fornecer instrumentos de análise para a pesquisa antropológica sobre

Num segundo movimento, o curso pretende discutir alguns temas clássicos que estruturam a reflexão das ciências sociais sobre a política, tais como clientelismo,