ww w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b j i d
The
Brazilian
Journal
of
INFECTIOUS
DISEASES
Original
article
Cervical
human
papillomavirus
infection
and
persistence:
a
clinic-based
study
in
the
countryside
from
South
Brazil
Janaina
Coser
a,b,
Thaís
da
Rocha
Boeira
b,∗,
Jonas
Michel
Wolf
b,
Kamila
Cerbaro
a,
Daniel
Simon
b,
Vagner
Ricardo
Lunge
aaCursodeBiomedicina,UniversidadedeCruzAlta(UNICRUZ),CruzAlta,RS,Brazil
bProgramadePós-Graduac¸ãoemBiologiaCelulareMolecularAplicadaàSaúde,UniversidadeLuteranadoBrasil(ULBRA),Canoas,RS,
Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received4August2015 Accepted14October2015 Availableonline17December2015
Keywords: HPVprevalence HPVpersistence Cervicalcancer Epidemiology
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Humanpapillomavirus(HPV)infectioniscommoninsexuallyactivewomenandviral per-sistencemaycauseintraepitheliallesionsandeventuallyprogresstocervicalcancer(CC). ThepresentstudyaimedtoinvestigateepidemiologicalfactorsrelatedtoHPVinfection andtoevaluateviralpersistenceandCCprecursorlesionsfrequenciesinwomenfroma cityinthecountrysideofSouthBrazil.Threehundredwomenwererecruitedfroma pri-marypublichealthcareclinic.The patientswereinterviewedandunderwentsampling withcervicalbrushesforHPV-DNAdetection/typingbyaPCR-basedassayandcytological analysisbyPapsmeartest.HPVwasdetectedin47(15.7%)women.HPVinfectionwas sig-nificantlyassociatedwithyoungage(<30years)andlowsocio-economicstatus.Seventeen (5.7%)womenpresentedcytologicalabnormalities,threeofthemwithprecursorCC intraep-itheliallesions.Asubgroupof79womenhadbeenpreviouslyanalyzedandthirteen(16.4%) werepersistentlyinfected,twowithprecursorCCintraepitheliallesionsandhigh-riskHPV typesinfection(bothofthemwithoutcervicalabnormalitiesinthefirstexam).In conclu-sion,HPVinfectionwasassociatedwithyoungage(<30years)andlowfamilyincome;viral persistencewaslow(16.4%)butrelatedtoCCprecursorlesions;andHPV-DNAhighrisk typesdetectionwouldhelptoscreenCCinthepopulation.
©2015ElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrightsreserved.
Introduction
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is one of the most common causes ofsexually transmitted diseases in the worldwide.
∗ Correspondingauthorat:LaboratóriodeDiagnósticoMolecular,UniversidadeLuteranadoBrasil,92425-900Canoas,RS,Brazil.
E-mailaddress:thaisboeira@gmail.com(T.d.R.Boeira).
Ithastheabilitytoinfectepithelial andmayresist asymp-tomatic or cause a variety of diseases, including cancer.1
HPV infection is usually transient and most people elimi-nate the virus from the body with the effective action of the immune system after5.1–15.4 months.2 However,HPV
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2015.10.008
persistencecancausebenignlesions,knownaswarts(in dif-ferentparts ofthebody), orlow/highgradeintra-epithelial lesions(LSIL/HSIL)thatcanprogresstocancer,mainlyinthe uterinecervix.3 Further,HPVpersistence and consequently
cervicalcancer (CC)dependsonotherfactors,suchasage, high parity,smoking,long-termuse ofcontraceptives, sex-ualbehaviorandco-infectionwithothersexuallytransmitted infectiousagents.4
HPV prevalence ranges from 13.7% to 54.3% according to the studied population and geographic area in Brazil reviewed by.5 However, main epidemiological studies have
beenperformedinthecapitalsandmetropolitancities.These studies demonstrated that HPV infection was associated withmultiplesexualpartners6;youngage,morelifetimesex
partners and abnormal vaginal flora7 and non-stable
sex-ualpartners.8HPVpersistencealsopresentedfrequenciesas
differentas19.2%inPorto Alegre(Rio GrandedoSulstate) and 59.6% in Ouro Preto (Minas Gerais state)in two stud-ies performed in primary public health care clinics from Brazil.9,10
Thisstudy aimedto investigateepidemiological aspects associatedwithHPVinfectionandtoevaluateHPVpersistence inwomenfromthecityofCruzAltaandsurroundingsmall localities.ThiscountrysideregionislocatedintheNorthof theRioGrandedoSul(thesouthernmoststateinBrazil)and itismorethan300kmawayfromtherespectivecapitalcity (PortoAlegre).
Methodology
Studypopulationandsamplecollection
Across-sectionalstudywasconductedwith300womenwho acceptedtoparticipateinthe studywhileattendingforCC screeninginaprimarypublichealthcareclinic(Centerfor WomenandChildren)inthecityofCruzAlta(RioGrandedo SulState,Brazil)fromJanuary2012toApril2013. Epidemiologi-calinformations(socio-demographic,behavioral,andclinical) wereobtainedfromastandardizedindividualquestionnaire thatwasadministeredbyatrainedinterviewerinaprivate room. The research projectwas approved by the Research EthicsCommitteeoftheUniversityofCruzAlta(ProtocolNo. 078.0.417-09).
After each participant gave informed consent, cervical samples were collected from all participants for HPV-DNA testing and cytologicalanalysis. Clinicalsamples were col-lected by scraping the ectocervix and endocervix of each patientwithanendocervicalbrush,smearedonaglassslide (thatwasfixedimmediatelywithpolyethyleneglycolfor cyto-logical examination) and after stored in a buffer solution (EDTApH8.00.01M,SDS0.03M),andstoredat−20◦Cuntil
analysis.
Womenalsoenrolled inapreviousreport11 or withtwo
visitsinthisstudy(minimumintervaloftwelvemonths)were identifiedtoevaluateHPVpersistence.Atotalof79 (26.3%) womenattendedthesecriteria(57evaluatedintheprevious studyand22analyzedtwiceinthisstudy)andcomposeda subgrouptoinvestigateHPVpersistence.
The clinical management of the patients was in accor-dance with the “Brazilian classificationforcervical reports andrecommendedprocedures:recommendationsforhealth professionals”.12ThisprotocoldonotestablishHPVtestingin
theroutinescreening,soresultsofHPVtypeswerenotused inthemanagementofthepatients.
HPV-DNAdetectionandtyping
HPV-DNA testing was performed by nested polymerase chainreaction(nested-PCR)andrestrictionfragmentlength polymorphism(RFLP)aspreviouslydescribed.13Samples
pre-senting insufficientDNA for HPV typing were classified as inconclusive. Resultswere interpreted by twoindependent analystsandHPVtypeswereclassifiedintohigh-risk(HR)and low-risk(LR).14
Cytologicalanalysis
The cytological analysis was performed by conventional Pap smear test evaluated by two independent cytologists (conflictingresultsweresubmittedtoathirdevaluation).Cell abnormalitieswereclassifiedaccordingtotheBethesda Sys-tem2001.15Basically,itclassifiesthemodifiedcellsintonine
categories(fivetosquamousandfourtoglandularcells):(1) squamouscellcarcinoma,(2)high-gradesquamous intraep-itheliallesion(HSIL),(3)low-gradesquamousintraepithelial lesion(LSIL),(4)atypicalsquamouscellsofundetermined sig-nificance (ASC-US),(5)atypical squamouscells thatcannot excludeHSIL (ASC-H),(6) adenocarcinoma, (7)endocervical adenocarcinomainsitu,(8)atypicalglandularcells(AG),and (9)atypicalglandularcellsnototherwisespecified(AG-NOS). Normalcellsweredefinedasnegativeforintraepitheliallesion andmalignancy(NILM).
HPVpersistence
Womenwith twoevaluationswere classified into four cat-egoriesaccordingtotheHPVinfectionstatus:(1)persistent infection:HPV-DNApositiveinbothassessments;(2) conver-sion:HPV-DNAnegativeinthefirstvisitandHPV-DNApositive inthe follow-up;(3) elimination(clearance):HPV-DNA pos-itive onlyinthefirst evaluation;(4) withoutHPVinfection: HPV-DNAnegativeinbothvisits.
Statisticalanalysis
DataanalysiswasconductedusingtheSPSSversion17.0 soft-ware (SPSS Inc., USA). Association between HPV infection statusandothervariableswasdeterminedwiththechi-square test. Multivariate modelswere conductedusing amodified Poissonregression16totesttheindependentassociationsof
HPVinfectionwithsocio-demographic,behavioraland clin-icalcharacteristics.Associations thatpresentedvaluesofp
between 0.05 and 0.15 in bivariate analysis were regarded as havingborderline significanceand were included inthe modelingofconfoundingfactors.Allpvaluespresentedare two-tailedandthevaluesofp<0.05wereconsidered statisti-callysignificant.
Table1–Analysisofsocio-demographiccharacteristicsinwomenaccordingtoHPVstatus.
Variables Overall(n=300) WithoutHPV(n=253) WithHPV(n=47) p-Valuea
Age(years) 0.003 ≤19 28(9.3) 19(7.5) 9(19.1) 20–29 56(18.7) 41(16.2) 15(31.9) 30–39 59(19.7) 50(19.8) 9(19.1) 40–49 60(20.0) 57(22.5) 3(6.4) 50–59 59(19.7) 53(20.9) 6(12.8) ≥60 38(12.7) 33(13.0) 5(10.6) Schoolingb 0.247
Elementaryorlowereducation 178(60.8) 153(62.2) 25(53.2)
Mediumorhighereducation 115(39.2) 93(37.8) 22(46.8)
Totalhouseholdincome(inBrazilianminimummonthlywage) <0.001
≤1 126(42.0) 93(36.8) 33(70.2)
2–3 162(54.0) 151(59.7) 11(23.4)
>3 12(4.0) 9(3.6) 3(6.4)
Maritalstatusb 0.014
Marriedorstableunion 56(56.6) 54(60.7) 2(20.0)
Single/divorced/widowed 43(43.4) 35(39.3) 8(80.0)
Childrenb 0.016
Yes 232(78.1) 203(80.6) 29(64.4)
No 65(21.9) 49(19.4) 16(35.6)
Dataarereportedasnumberwithpercentinparentheses.
a
2testwasusedtocomparebetweenparticipants.
b Totaldonotcoincidesduetothelackofdata.
Results
Ofthe300womenevaluatedinthestudy,HPVwasdetectedin 47(15.7%).Ofthesepositivesamples,26(55.3%)hadsingleand 10(21.3%)multipleHPVtypeinfections(itwasnotpossibleto determinethetypeintheremaining11positivesamples).A totalof23viraltypeswereidentified;including15(65.2%)HR and8(34.8%)LR.TypesHRmostfrequentswere16(n=6),31 (n=4),45(n=4)and56(n=3).OtherHRtypeswere18,35,39, 52,53,58,59,68,70,73and82.TypesLRmostfrequentswere 6and81(n=3;each).OtherLRtypeswere11,42,44,55,64and 84.
HPVpositivewomenwereyounger(33.9±17.0years)than the HPV negative ones (41.8±14.7 years; p<0.001). Other socio-demographiccharacteristicssignificantlyassociatedto HPVinfectionwere:tohaveatotalhouseholdincomelower than oneBrazilian minimummonthly wage (p<0.001), not to be married (p=0.014) and to have children (p=0.016) (Table1).
Consistentcondomusewassignificantlyassociatedtothe HPVinfection(p<0.001).Otherbehavioralcharacteristics(age atfirstintercourse,numberoflifetimesexualpartners, smok-ingand contraceptiveoraluse)didnotpresent association withHPVdetection(Table2).
Regardingclinical aspects,HPVinfection wasassociated totheoccurrenceofcellabnormalitiesinthePapsmeartest (p<0.001). Further,HPVwas morefrequentin womenthat underwentaPaptestinthelasttwelvemonthsthaninthe otherones(p=0.031).Historyofsexuallytransmitteddiseases andconcurrentvaginalinfectionwerenotassociatedtoHPV infection.
All theaboveepidemiologicalvariableswithastatistical significanceinthechi-squaretestweresubmittedtothe mul-tivariateanalysis(exceptingmaritalstatusthatpresenteda high number ofmissed data and the expected occurrence ofcell abnormalitiesinthe PapsmeartestinHPVpositive women).HPVinfectionwasassociatedtothetotalhousehold income lower than one Brazilianminimum monthly wage (p=0.001),youngage(<30yearsold;p=0.028)anduseof con-dominallrelations(p=0.023)(Table3).
Inthecytologicalanalysis,mostwomendidnotpresent cellabnormalities(n=279;93%),243(87.1%)withoutHPVand 36(12.9%)withHPV.Seventeen(5.7%)womenpresentedcells alterations,fourteen(4.7%)ofthemonlywithatypicalcells, one(0.3%)withLSIL andtwo(0.7%) withHSIL.Thepatient withLSILwasinfectedbyHRtype45,whilethewomenwith HSILwereinfectedwiththeHRtype16andLRtype16plus 6 (mixedinfection).Four samples presentedunsatisfactory cytologyresultscausedbycontaminationwithbloodcells,pus andmucusinover75%ofthesmear(Table4).
Inthesubgroupof79womenwithtwovisits,46women (58.2%)showednoHPVinfectioninbothassessments.Almost allofthem(n=44;95.7%)hadnormalPapsmeartestonboth visits,buttwo(4.3%)presentedatypicalresults(oneASC-US andanotherASC-USplusAG-NOS,bothinthesecondvisit). Eighteen(22.8%)womeneliminatedHPVinfection,presenting normalcellsinbothPapsmeartests.Onlytwo(2.6%)women showedconversiontoanHPV-DNApositivestatus,but with-out cytological alterations. The remaining thirteen (16.4%) womenhadpersistentHPVinfection,mostofthemwithan HRtypeinthebaselinetest(n=11;84.6%).Allthesewomen presentednormalPapsmearinthefirstvisitandten(76.9%) hadthissameresultinthesecondexam,whilethree(23.1%)
Table2–AnalysisofbehavioralandclinicalcharacteristicsinwomenaccordingtoHPVstatus.
Variables Overall(n=300) WithoutHPV(n=253) WithHPV(n=47) p-Value*
Ageatfirstintercourse 0.248
<18 175(58.3) 144(56.9) 31(66.0)
≥18 125(41.7) 109(43.1) 16(34.0)
Lifetimesexpartners 0.147
1 144(48.0) 126(49.8) 18(38.3)
≥2 156(52.0) 127(50.2) 29(61.7)
Smoking 0.674
Yes 39(13.0) 32(12.6) 7(14.9)
No 261(87.0) 221(87.4) 40(85.1)
Contraceptiveoraluse 0.259
Yes 106(35.3) 86(34.0) 20(42.6) No 194(64.7) 167(66.0) 27(57.4) Condomuse <0.001 Yes 92(30.7) 67(26.5) 25(53.2) No 208(69.3) 186(73.5) 22(46.8) HistoryofSTD 0.275 Yes 48(16.0) 43(17.0) 5(10.6) No 252(84.0) 210(83.0) 42(89.4)
Concurrentvaginalinfection 0.977
Yes 57(19.0) 48(19.0) 9(19.1)
No 243(81.0) 205(81.0) 38(80.9)
LastPaptest 0.031
Firsttime 37(12.3) 27(10.7) 10(21.3) ≤1year 150(50.0) 124(49.0) 26(55.3) ≥2years 113(37.7) 102(40.3) 11(23.4) Paptest <0.001 Normal 279(94.3) 243(96.1) 36(76.6) Abnormal 17(5.6) 6(2.3) 11(23.4) Unsatisfactorysample 4(1.4) 4(1.6) 0(0.0)
Dataarereportedasnumberwithpercentinparentheses.
∗
2testwasusedtocomparebetweenparticipants.
Table3–MultivariateanalysisofriskfactorstoHPVinfectioninwomeninSouthBrazil(n=300).
Variable PRadjusted CI(95%) p-Value
Age 0.028
≥30years 1 –
<30years 2.00 1.08–3.72
Totalhouseholdincome 0.001
>1Brazilianminimummonthlywage 1 –
≤1Brazilianminimummonthlywage 2.74 1.55–4.86
Havechildren 0.438
Yes 1 –
No 1.28 0.68–2.42
Lifetimesexualpartner 0.262
1partner 1 –
≥2partner 1.36 0.80–2.31
Useofcondominallsexualrelations 0.023
No 1 –
Yes 1.87 1.09–3.22
FirstPaptest 0.761
No 1 –
Table4–CytologicaldiagnosisaccordingtothepresenceofHPVinfection.
Cytologicaldiagnosis WithoutHPV(N=253) WithHPV(N=47) Allwomen(N=300)
NILM 243(96.0) 36(76.6)a 279(93.0) ASC-US 4(1.6) 6(12.8)b 10(3.3) ASC-H 1(0.4) 1(2.1)c 2(0.7) ASC-H+AG 0(0.0) 1(2.1) 1(0.3) LSIL 0(0.0) 1(2.1)d 1(0.3) HSIL 0(0.0) 2(4.3)e 2(0.7) AG-NOS 1(0.4) 0(0.0) 1(0.3) Unsatisfactorysample 4(1.6) 0(0.0) 4(1.4)
Dataarereportedasnumberwithpercentinparentheses.NILM:negativeforintraepitheliallesionandmalignancy;ASC-US:atypicalsquamous cellsofundeterminedsignificance;ASC-H:atypicalsquamouscells,cannotexcludehigh-gradelesion;LSIL:low-gradesquamousintraepithelial lesion;HSIL:high-gradesquamousintraepitheliallesion;AG:atypicalglandularcells;AG-NOS:atypicalglandularcellsnototherwisespecified.
a IncludessixteencasesofinfectionsinglebyHPVtypeshighrisk:16(3cases),31and53(2caseseach),35,45,58,70,73and82(1caseeach)
andthreecasesofinfectionmultiplebyHPVtypes52and68;31and45;55and56;alsoincludessevencasesofinfectionsinglebyonlyHPV typeslow-risk:6,11,42,44,64,and84(1caseeach)andonecaseinfectionmultiplebyHPVtypes6and81.
b IncludesfourcasesofinfectionsinglebyHPVtypeshighrisk:31,52,56,59andtwocasesofinfectionmultiplebyHPVtypes16and35;39
and81.
c IncludeinfectionsinglebyHPVtype18. d IncludeinfectionsinglebyHPVtype45.
e IncludeoneinfectionsinglebyHPVtype16andoneinfectionmultiplebyHPV6and16.
presentedcellsabnormalities.OneofthesewomenhadAG associatedtoapersistentinfectionwithHRtype45,another presentedLSILassociatedtomixedinfectionsofHRtypesin bothvisits(18plus33inthefirsttestand16plus18inthe secondone) andthe lastonepresentedHSIL withamixed infection ofHRtype 52 and73 in thefirst visit and single infectionwithHRtype52inthefollow-up(Table5).
Discussion
The present work is a cross-sectional study with women attendedinapublichealthserviceinacity fromthe coun-trysidefromSouthBrazil.Inthisregion,HPVinfectionwas associatedwithfoursocio-demographical(youngage, mari-talstatus,parityandtotalhouseholdincome),onebehavioral (consistentcondomuse)andtwoclinical(cellalterationsin thePaptestperformedinthepresentstudyandpreviousPap testinginaperiodofoneyear)aspects.
Young age is a classical independent factor associated to HPV infection and it is well reported in the scientific literature.8,17,18Itisrelatedtothemoreintensesexualactivity
inthisage(thatfavorstheinfection)aswellastoan anatom-icalcharacteristicoftheyoungwomen(cervicalectopy)that
exposesthecolumnarepitheliumintheectocervix,makingit morevulnerabletopathogeninfections.19,20
It was also observed a significant higher proportion of single,divorcedorwidowedthanmarriedwomenwithHPV infectioninthebivariateanalysis.Howeverthisvariablewas notincludedinthemultivariateanalysisbecausethelimited dataavailable(n=99,lessthanonethirdofthetotalsample population).Otherstudies havealsofoundthisassociation, probablybecauseunmarriedwomenhaveahigherrisk behav-iorthantheseoneslivingwithastablepartner.21–23
Furthermore,itwasfoundasignificantlyhigherproportion ofHPVinfectedwomenwithchildrenthanthosewithout chil-dreninthebivariateanalysis.Howeverthisassociationwas notsignificantinthemultivariateanalysis.Intheliterature, somestudies founda positiveassociation10,24,25 while
oth-ersreportednosignificantrelationbetweenparityandHPV infection.6,26
Interestingly, total household income of less than one minimum Brazilian monthly wage (that means low socio-economystatus)wasstronglyandsignificantlyassociatedto HPVinfection inthebivariateand eveninthe multivariate analyses wage (p=0.001). Similar findings were reportedin othercountries27,28andalsointheNortheasternfromBrazil.29
AnotherstudyalsoreportedthatHPVwasmorefrequentin
Table5–CourseofHPVinfectionandclassificationofviraltypeinwomenfromSouthBrazil.
Courseofinfection Alla(N=79) HPVbaseline(N=33)
High-risk(N=19) OnlyLoworindeterminate risk(N=14)
Persistence 13(16.4) 9(47.3) 4(28.5)
Clearance 18(22.8) 8(42.2) 10(71.5)
Conversion 2(2.6) 2(10.5) 0(0.0)
NoHPV 46(58.2) – –
Dataarereportedasnumberwithpercentinparentheses.
publichealthservicesthaninprivateclinics,highlightingthe roleofthesocioeconomicstatusinHPVinfection.30Asaglobal
context,povertyorinsufficientincomeisasocialdeterminant forincreasedvulnerabilityofwomenandcaneitherinfluence theadoptionofpreventivemeasuresagainstsexually trans-mitteddiseasesorreducetheaccesstoinformationandhealth services.31 Thisreinforcestheneedforthedevelopmentof
preventionandcontrolprogramsinlow-incomepopulations. Several sexual behaviors have been associated to HPV infectioninotherBrazilianreports.6,8,32,33Inthepresentstudy,
HPV infection was surprisingly associated with consistent condomuse. Condomoffers goodprotectionagainst infec-tions,but HPVcan be transmittedby contactwith genital areas not covered by this preservative.34 Previous studies
havereportedaprotectiveeffectofcondomsinpreventing HPVinfection,butwithoutstatisticalsignificance.35,36In
addi-tion,misuseorproblemswithcondoms(breakage,slippage or incomplete use with delayed placement, early removal andevenreuse)arefactorsthatmayofferlessprotection,as reportedpreviously.37Condomusemayalsohavebeenmore
reportedthaneffectivelydoneinthepractice,consideringthat theuseissociallydesirable.34Finally,womenwithnewand/or
multiplesexualpartnersusecondomsmorefrequentlythan thosewhoonlyhaveoneregularpartnerandcouldberelated toahigherriskbehavioraspreviouslyreported.34,38
Ontheotherhand,itwasnotobservedassociationbetween HPVinfectionandthenumberoflifetimesexualpartners,age atfirstintercourseand historyofsexually transmitted dis-easeandotherconcomitantgenital infectiondemonstrated inpreviousstudies.6,32AnotherstudyconductedintheSouth
BrazildidnotfindassociationofthesecharacteristicsandHPV infection.39
In the cytological analysis, a lowpercentage of women withoutHPVinfection(4.1%)hadabnormalPapsmearwhile ahigherfrequencyofwomenwithHPVinfection(23.4%) pre-sentedatypicalcellsand/orLSIL/HSILasexpected.Regardless ofthedegreeofthelesion,allofthempresentedHRHPVtypes. Infact,normalcytologypredominatesamongwomenwithout HPVinfection,asshowninpreviousstudiesinBrazil7,26,40and
eveninothercountries.17,41
HPVpersistenceinthispopulationwas16.4%.Further, per-sistentHRHPVtypesinfectionwasassociatedwithabnormal Papsmearinthreepatients(oneAG,oneHSILandoneLSIL). ThefrequencyofAGislow,rangingfrom0.05%to2.1%,but thiscytologicalabnormalityhasclinicalsignificance(several casesprogresstoCC).42 Oncontrast,LSILand HSILare
rel-ativelycommon,accountingfor31%and9.7%(respectively), amongwomenwithcytologicalabnormalcervicalcells.43In
thissituation,HPV-DNAtestwouldbeusefultomonitorthe occurrenceofcervicallesionsinwomen.43–45
PapsmeartestisaneffectivemethodadoptedfortheCC screeningandshouldbeperformedonceayearineachwoman aged25–64.43 Thisproceduresignificantlyreducedthe
inci-dence ofcervical cancer in Brazil in the last five decades. Howeverseveral newCC patientshavebeen detectedeach yearandthisdiseaseisstilloneofthemaincausesofdeath inwomen.43Thereisconsistentevidenceontheperformance
of HPV-DNA testing combined with cytological analysis to detectcervicallesionswithmoreaccuracy.Somecountriesin EuropeandNorthAmericahaveadoptedHPV-DNAtestingin
clinicalpractice.ThelatestCCscreeningguidelinesofseveral internationalhealthinstitutionsrecommendedtheadoption ofcytologyandHPV-DNAtestingforanywoman.46,47
How-ever, HPV-DNA testingin combinationwith cytologyisnot routinelyperformedinthepublicclinicsinBrazil.The intro-duction ofHPV-DNAtesting couldhelp inthescreeningof precursorlesionsandintheeffectiveCCcontrol.43,46,48,49
Screening programs forcervical lesions in womenhave beenimplementedinthelastdecadesinBrazil.Suchefforts aimtodetectcancerprecursorlesionsandtoprovideearly treatmentforthepatients,reducingtheincidenceofuterine cervicalcancerinwomen.Thepresentstudywasconducted inoneofthispublicprimaryhealthcareserviceslocatedina medium-sizecityfromtheSouthofBrazil.Althoughwomenof onlyonecitywereincludedinthestudy,themajorityofthem isoflowsocioeconomicstatus,representingwomenattended bythehealthpublicservicesinothercitiesandregionsofthe country.Inthis sense,the datareportedherecontributeto abetterunderstandingoftheHPVepidemiologyandwillbe helpfultodefinepublichealthpoliciesinBrazil.
Inconclusion,the resultsofthisstudyindicate thatage lowerthan30yearsandlowfamilysocioeconomicstatusare associatedtoHPVinfectioninwomenfromthecountryside ofSouthBrazil.Further,itwasdetectedaprevalenceofHPV infectionof15.7%andarelativelylowHPVpersistence(16.4%), stronglyrelatedtoCCprecursorlesions.HPV-DNAhighrisk typesdetectionwouldhelptoscreenCCinthepopulation.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
Acknowledgments
TheauthorsthankthestaffoftheCenterforWomen’sHealth in Cruz Alta/RS and patients for their collaboration. We alsothankthetechniciansoftheUniversidadedeCruzAlta (CytopathologyLaboratory),UniversidadeLuteranadoBrasil (MolecularDiagnosticsLaboratory)whoperformedtechnical support and Simbios Biotecnologia for the partial finan-cialsupport.ThisworkwasalsosupportedbyFundac¸ãode AmparoàPesquisadoEstadodoRioGrandedoSul(FAPERGS; Grant1265-2551/13-4).
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1.BoschFX,BrokerTR,FormanD,etal.onbehalfoftheauthors ofICOMonographComprehensiveControlofHPVInfections andRelatedDiseasesVaccineVolume30Supplement5,2012; Comprehensivecontrolofhumanpapillomavirusinfections andrelateddiseases.Vaccine.2013;31:H1–31.
2.TrottierH,MahmudS,PradoJC,etal.Type-specificduration ofhumanpapillomavirusinfection:implicationsforhuman papillomavirusscreeningandvaccination.JInfectDis. 2008;197:1436–47.
3.StanleyMA.Epithelialcellresponsestoinfectionwithhuman papillomavirus.ClinMicrobiolRev.2012;25:215–22.
4.ArnheimDahlströmL,AnderssonK,LuostarinenT,etal. Prospectiveseroepidemiologicstudyofhuman
papillomavirusandotherriskfactorsincervicalcancer. CancerEpidemiolBiomarkersPrev.2011;20:2541–50.
5. AyresARG,SilvaGA.CervicalHPVinfectioninBrazil: systematicreview.RevSaudePublica.2010;44:963–74.
6. FernandesTAAM,MeissnerRV,BezerraLF,deAzevedoPRM, FernandesJV.Humanpapillomavirusinfectioninwomen attendedatacervicalcancerscreeningserviceinNatal, Brazil.BrazJMicrobiol.2008;39:573–8.
7. LippmanSA,SucupiraMCA,JonesHE,etal.Prevalence, distributionandcorrelatesofendocervicalhuman papillomavirustypesinBrazilianwomen.IntJSTDAIDS. 2010;21:105–9.
8. AugustoEF,dosSantosLS,OliveiraLHS.Human
papillomavirusdetectionincervicalscrapesfromwomen attendedintheFamilyHealthProgram.RevLatino-Am Enfermagem.2014;22:100–7.
9. MirandaPM,SilvaNNT,PitolBCV,etal.Persistenceor clearanceofhumanpapillomavirusinfectionsinwomenin OuroPreto,Brazil.BiomedResInt.2013:1–6.
10.RosaMI,FachelJMG,RosaDD,MedeirosLR,IgansiCN, BozzettiMC.Persistenceandclearanceofhuman papillomavirusinfection:aprospectivecohortstudy.AmJ ObstetGynecol.2008;99:1–7.
11.CoserJ,BoeiraTR,SimonD,FonsecaASK,IkutaN,LungeVR. Prevalenceandgenotypicdiversityofcervicalhuman papillomavirusinfectionamongwomenfromanurban centerinBrazil.GenetMolRes.2013;12:4276–85.
12.INCA.InstitutoNacionaldeCâncer–BRASIL.Coordenac¸ão GeraldeAc¸õesEstratégicas.DivisãodeApoioàRedede Atenc¸ãoOncológica.Diretrizesbrasileirasparao
rastreamentodocâncerdocolodoútero/InstitutoNacional deCâncer.Coordenac¸ãoGeraldeAc¸õesEstratégicas.Divisão deApoioàRededeAtenc¸ãoOncológica–RiodeJaneiro; 2011.
13.CoserJ,BoeiraTR,FonsecaAK,IkutaN,LungeVR.Human papillomaviusdetectionandtypingusinganested-PCR-RFLP assay.BrazJInfectDis.2011;15:467–72.
14.deVilliersEM,FauquetC,BrokerTR,BernardH-U,zurHausen H.Classificationofpapillomaviruses.Virology.2004;324:17–27.
15.SolomonD,NayarR.SistemaBethesdaparaCitopatologia Cervicovaginal–Definic¸ões,CritérioseNotasExplicativas.Rio deJaneiro:Revinter;2005.
16.BarrosAJ,HirakataVN.Alternativesforlogisticregressionin cross-sectionalstudies:anempiricalcomparisonofmodels thatdirectlyestimatetheprevalenceratio.BMCMedRes Methodol.2003;3:21.
17.BoschFX,BurchellAN,SchiffmanCM,etal.Epidemiologyand naturalhistoryofhumanpapillomavirusinfectionsand type-specificimplicationsincervicalneoplasia.Vaccine. 2008;26:1–26.
18.BrunoA,SerravalleK,TravassosAG,LimaBGC.Genotype distributionofhumanpapillomavirusinwomenfromthe stateofBahia,Brazil.RevBrasGinecolObstet.2014;36:416–22.
19.HwangLY,JLiebermanJA,MaY,FarhatS,MoscickiAB. Cervicalectopyandtheacquisitionofhumanpapillomavirus inadolescentsandyoungwomen.ObstetGynecol.
2012;119:1164–70.
20.MonroyOL,AguilarC,LizanoM,Cruz-TaloniaF,CruzRM, Rocha-ZavaletaL.Prevalenceofhumanpapillomavirus genotypes,andmucosalIgAanti-viralresponsesinwomen withcervicalectopy.JClinVirol.2010;47:43–8.
21.FoliakiS,BrewerN,PearceN,etal.PrevalenceofHPV infectionandotherriskfactorsinaFijianpopulation.Infect AgentCancer.2014;9:14.
22.GirianelliVR,ThulerLCS,SilvaGA.PrevalenceofHPV infectionamongwomencoveredbytheFamilyHealth ProgramintheBaixadaFluminense,RiodeJaneiro,Brazil.Rev BrasGinecolObstet.2010;32:39–46.
23.GravittPE,RositchAF,SilverMI,etal.Acohorteffectofthe sexualrevolutionmaybemaskinganincreaseinhuman papillomavirusdetectionatmenopauseintheUnitedStates. JInfectDis.2013;207:272–80.
24.JahdiF,KhademiK,KhoeiEM,HaghaniH,YarandiF. Reproductivefactorsassociatedtohumanpapillomavirus infectioninIranianwoman.JFamilyReprodHealth. 2013;7:145–9.
25.KasapB,YetimalarH,KeklikA,YildizA,CukurovaK,SoyluF. PrevalenceandriskfactorsforhumanpapillomavirusDNAin cervicalcytology.EurJObstetGynecolReprodBiol.
2011;159:168–71.
26.IgansiCN,dosSantosVK,daRosaMI,etal.HPVand Chlamydiatrachomatisgenitalinfectionamong
non-symptomaticwomen:prevalence,associatedfactorsand relationshipwithcervicallesions.CadSaudeColet.
2012;20:287–96.
27.KahnJA,LanD,KahnRS.Sociodemographicfactors associatedwithhigh-riskhumanpapillomavirusinfection. ObstetGynecol.2007;110:87–95.
28.ShieldsTS,BrintonLA,BurkRD,etal.Acase-controlstudyof riskfactorsforinvasivecervicalcanceramongU.S.women exposedtooncogenictypesofhumanpapillomavirus.Cancer EpidemiolBiomarkersPrev.2004;13:1574–82.
29.deMendonc¸aVG,GuimarãesMJB,LimaFilhoJ,etal.Human papillomaviruscervicalinfection:viralgenotypingandrisk factorsforhigh-gradesquamousintraepitheliallesionand cervixcancer.RevBrasGinecolObstet.2010;32:476–85.
30.OliveiraLH,RosaML,PereiraCR,etal.Humanpapillomavirus statusandcervicalabnormalitiesinwomenfrompublicand privatehealthcareinRiodeJaneiroState,Brazil.RevInst MedTrop.2006;48:279–85.
31.QuinnTC,OverbaughJ.HIV/AIDSinwomen:anexpanding epidemic.Science.2005;308:1582–3.
32.NonnenmacherB,BreitenbachaV,VillaLL,ProllaJC,Bozzetti MC.Genitalhumanpapillomavirusinfectionidentificationby molecularbiologyamongasymptomaticwomen.RevSaude Publica.2002;36:95–100.
33.RamaCH,Roteli-MartinsCM,DerchainSFM,etal.Prevalence ofgenitalHPVinfectionamongwomenscreenedforcervical cancer.RevSaudePublica.2008;42:123–30.
34.LamJU,ReboljM,DuguéPA,BondeJ,vonEuler-ChelpinM, LyngeE.CondomuseinpreventionofHumanPapillomavirus infectionsandcervicalneoplasia:systematicreviewof longitudinalstudies.JMedScreen.2014;21:38–50.
35.Sanchez-AlemanMA,Uribe-SalasFJ,Lazcano-PonceEC, Conde-GlezCJ.Humanpapillomavirusincidenceandrisk factorsamongMexicanfemalecollegestudents.SexTransm Dis.2011;38(4):275–8.
36.WinerRL,HughesJP,FengQ,etal.Condomuseandtheriskof genitalhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninyoungwomen.N EnglJMed.2006;354:2645–54.
37.SandersSA,YarberWL,KaufmanEL,CrosbyRA,GrahamCA, MilhausenRR.Condomuseerrorsandproblems:aglobal view.SexHealth.2012;9:81–95.
38.MacalusoM,DemandMJ,ArtzLM,HookEW.Partnertypeand condomuse.AIDS.2000;14:537–46.
39.EntiauspeLG,SilveiraM,NunesEM,etal.Highincidenceof oncogenicHPVgenotypesfoundinwomenfromSouthern Brazil.BrazJMicrobiol.2014;45:689–94.
40.OliveiraLHS,FerreiraMDPL,AugustoEF,etal.Human papillomavirusgenotypesinasymptomaticyoungwomen frompublicschoolsinRiodeJaneiro,Brazil.RevSocBrasMed Trop.2010;43:4–8.
41.deSanjoséS,DiazM,CastellsaguéX,etal.Worldwide prevalenceandgenotypedistributionofcervicalhuman papillomavirusDNAinwomenwithnormalcytology:a meta-analysis.LancetInfectDis.2007;7:453–9.
42.MarquesJPH,CostaLB,PintoAPS,etal.Atypicalglandular cellsandcervicalcancer:systematicreview.RevAssocMed Bras.2011;57:234–8.
43.CrothersJW,MountSL,HarmonM,WegnerE.Theutilityof humanpapillomavirustestinginyoungwomenwithatypical glandularcellsonPaptest.JLowGenitTractDis.2015;19:22–6.
44.HosteG,VossaertK,PoppeWAJ.TheclinicalroleofHPV testinginprimaryandsecondarycervicalcancerscreening. ObstetGynecolInt.2013:1–7.
45.SudengaSL,ShresthaS.Keyconsiderationsandcurrent perspectivesofepidemiologicalstudiesonhuman papillomaviruspersistence,theintermediatephenotypeto cervicalcancer.IntJInfectDis.2013;17(4):216–20.
46.JinXW,LipoldL,McKenzieM,SikonA.Cervicalcancer screening:what’snewandwhat’scoming?CleveClinJMed. 2013;80:153–60.
47.SchiffmanM,WentzensenN,WacholderS,KinneyW,GageJC, CastlePE.Humanpapillomavirustestinginthepreventionof cervicalcancer.JNCI.2011;103:368–83.
48.MayrandMH,Duarte-FrancoE,RodriguesI,etal.Human papillomavirusDNAversusPapanicolaouscreeningtestsfor cervicalcancer.NEnglJMed.2007;357:1579–80.
49.RoncoG,Giorgi-RossiP,CarozziF,etal.Efficacyofhuman papillomavirustestingforthedetectionofinvasivecervical cancersandcervicalintraepithelialneoplasia:arandomised controlledtrial.LancetOncol.2010;11:249–57.