• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Kabir Soeny, Barbara Bogacka Byron Jones, Thomas Bouillon

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Share "Kabir Soeny, Barbara Bogacka Byron Jones, Thomas Bouillon"

Copied!
107
0
0

Texto

(1)

OPTIMUMDOSING REGIMENSELECTIONFOR ATARGETDRUG CONCENTRATION

Kabir Soeny, Barbara Bogacka

Queen Mary, University of London

Byron Jones, Thomas Bouillon

Novartis Pharma AG

(2)

Introduction

Efficient Dosing Regimens Notation

Criteria of Efficiency Efficient Dosing Algorithm Applications and Extensions

Example: One-compartment Model Extension: Combination of Two Drugs Example: CoartemR

Population Optimum Dose Regimen Conclusions

(3)

Introduction

I Following the correct selection of a therapy based on the indication, an optimaldosing regimenis the most important determinant of therapeutic success of a medical therapy.

I Most physicians rely on the prescription information for choosing dosing regimens, so the ethical responsibility for supplying an optimal dosing regimen remains largely with pharmaceutical companies.

I In the past, the pharmaceutical industry was predominantly interested in achieving approval based on differentiation of the drug against placebo or an active comparator,

neglecting the optimization of dosing regimens.

(4)

Introduction

I Following the correct selection of a therapy based on the indication, an optimaldosing regimenis the most important determinant of therapeutic success of a medical therapy.

I Most physicians rely on the prescription information for choosing dosing regimens, so the ethical responsibility for supplying an optimal dosing regimen remains largely with pharmaceutical companies.

I In the past, the pharmaceutical industry was predominantly interested in achieving approval based on differentiation of the drug against placebo or an active comparator,

neglecting the optimization of dosing regimens.

(5)

Introduction

I Following the correct selection of a therapy based on the indication, an optimaldosing regimenis the most important determinant of therapeutic success of a medical therapy.

I Most physicians rely on the prescription information for choosing dosing regimens, so the ethical responsibility for supplying an optimal dosing regimen remains largely with pharmaceutical companies.

I In the past, the pharmaceutical industry was predominantly interested in achieving approval based on differentiation of the drug against placebo or an active comparator,

neglecting the optimization of dosing regimens.

(6)

Introduction

I Following the correct selection of a therapy based on the indication, an optimaldosing regimenis the most important determinant of therapeutic success of a medical therapy.

I Most physicians rely on the prescription information for choosing dosing regimens, so the ethical responsibility for supplying an optimal dosing regimen remains largely with pharmaceutical companies.

I In the past, the pharmaceutical industry was predominantly interested in achieving approval based on differentiation of the drug against placebo or an active comparator,

neglecting the optimization of dosing regimens.

(7)

Introduction

I The maximal safe dose was often chosen for confirmatory phase III trials and initially approved/administered to the general patient population.

I In several cases, this initial dose had to be lowered after marketing of the drug, in some cases, the entire program was stopped after unacceptable adverse effects within the high dose range occurred.

I Provision of theminimal clinical effective dose, the

maximum safe doseand theoptimal doseby indication not only improves the chances of a successful approval, but can cure the disease more effectively.

(8)

Introduction

I The maximal safe dose was often chosen for confirmatory phase III trials and initially approved/administered to the general patient population.

I In several cases, this initial dose had to be lowered after marketing of the drug, in some cases, the entire program was stopped after unacceptable adverse effects within the high dose range occurred.

I Provision of theminimal clinical effective dose, the

maximum safe doseand theoptimal doseby indication not only improves the chances of a successful approval, but can cure the disease more effectively.

(9)

Introduction

I The maximal safe dose was often chosen for confirmatory phase III trials and initially approved/administered to the general patient population.

I In several cases, this initial dose had to be lowered after marketing of the drug, in some cases, the entire program was stopped after unacceptable adverse effects within the high dose range occurred.

I Provision of theminimal clinical effective dose, the

maximum safe doseand theoptimal doseby indication not only improves the chances of a successful approval, but can cure the disease more effectively.

(10)

Introduction

I Here we present an algorithm for optimization of loading and maintenance doses

I of single drugs

I and two combined drugs, where the combination ratio is also optimized.

I This is achieved based on a target concentration or a therapeutic concentration window.

I We also present a design for an adaptive clinical trial and some simulation studies.

(11)

Introduction

I Here we present an algorithm for optimization of loading and maintenance doses

I of single drugs

I and two combined drugs, where the combination ratio is also optimized.

I This is achieved based on a target concentration or a therapeutic concentration window.

I We also present a design for an adaptive clinical trial and some simulation studies.

(12)

Introduction

I Here we present an algorithm for optimization of loading and maintenance doses

I of single drugs

I and two combined drugs, where the combination ratio is also optimized.

I This is achieved based on a target concentration or a therapeutic concentration window.

I We also present a design for an adaptive clinical trial and some simulation studies.

(13)

Introduction

Concentration of a drug in blood after administering a single dose.

(14)

Introduction

The concentration of a drug with multiple dosing.

The areas of under-exposure are marked with ‘-’ sign and over-exposure are marked with ‘+’ sign. The green line represents thetarget concentrationof the drug that is desired to be maintained.

(15)

Introduction

The concentration of a drug with multiple dosing.

The areas of under-exposure are marked with ‘-’ sign and over-exposure are marked with ‘+’ sign. The green line represents thetarget concentrationof the drug that is desired to be maintained.

(16)

Introduction

The areas of under- and over-exposure are to be minimized by anoptimum choice of dose levels.

We start assuming that the PK model is known and that we know the estimates of the model parameters.

(17)

Introduction

The areas of under- and over-exposure are to be minimized by anoptimum choice of dose levels.

We start assuming that the PK model is known and that we know the estimates of the model parameters.

(18)

Efficient Dosing Regimens

Notation

D= (d1,d2, ..., dn)denotes a vector of dosesdithat are administered atnoccasions, adosing regimen.

Ci(t,d1, . . . ,di)denotes the concentration of the drug at timet after dosesd1, . . . ,diare administered.

Functions∆i:D7→R≥0, D⊂Ri≥0,i=1, . . . ,n, are such that,

i(d1, . . . ,di) = Z ti

ti−1

|C(t,d1, . . . ,di)−Ctgt|dt,

whereCtgtdenotes the target concentration.

The∆-functions measure theareas of under- and over-exposurearound the target concentration. We denote by∆= (∆1,∆2, ...,∆n)the vector of∆-functions.

(19)

Efficient Dosing Regimens

Notation

D= (d1,d2, ..., dn)denotes a vector of dosesdi that are administered atnoccasions, adosing regimen.

Ci(t,d1, . . . ,di)denotes the concentration of the drug at timet after dosesd1, . . . ,diare administered.

Functions∆i:D7→R≥0, D⊂Ri≥0,i=1, . . . ,n, are such that,

i(d1, . . . ,di) = Z ti

ti−1

|C(t,d1, . . . ,di)−Ctgt|dt,

whereCtgtdenotes the target concentration.

The∆-functions measure theareas of under- and over-exposurearound the target concentration. We denote by∆= (∆1,∆2, ...,∆n)the vector of∆-functions.

(20)

Efficient Dosing Regimens

Notation

D= (d1,d2, ..., dn)denotes a vector of dosesdi that are administered atnoccasions, adosing regimen.

Ci(t,d1, . . . ,di)denotes the concentration of the drug at timet after dosesd1, . . . ,di are administered.

Functions∆i:D7→R≥0, D⊂Ri≥0,i=1, . . . ,n, are such that,

i(d1, . . . ,di) = Z ti

ti−1

|C(t,d1, . . . ,di)−Ctgt|dt,

whereCtgtdenotes the target concentration.

The∆-functions measure theareas of under- and over-exposurearound the target concentration. We denote by∆= (∆1,∆2, ...,∆n)the vector of∆-functions.

(21)

Efficient Dosing Regimens

Notation

D= (d1,d2, ..., dn)denotes a vector of dosesdi that are administered atnoccasions, adosing regimen.

Ci(t,d1, . . . ,di)denotes the concentration of the drug at timet after dosesd1, . . . ,di are administered.

Functions∆i:D7→R≥0, D⊂Ri≥0,i=1, . . . ,n, are such that,

i(d1, . . . ,di) = Z ti

ti−1

|C(t,d1, . . . ,di)−Ctgt|dt, whereCtgtdenotes the target concentration.

The∆-functions measure theareas of under- and over-exposurearound the target concentration. We denote by∆= (∆1,∆2, ...,∆n)the vector of∆-functions.

(22)

Efficient Dosing Regimens

Notation

D= (d1,d2, ..., dn)denotes a vector of dosesdi that are administered atnoccasions, adosing regimen.

Ci(t,d1, . . . ,di)denotes the concentration of the drug at timet after dosesd1, . . . ,di are administered.

Functions∆i:D7→R≥0, D⊂Ri≥0,i=1, . . . ,n, are such that,

i(d1, . . . ,di) = Z ti

ti−1

|C(t,d1, . . . ,di)−Ctgt|dt,

whereCtgtdenotes the target concentration.

The∆-functions measure theareas of under- and over-exposurearound the target concentration.

We denote by∆= (∆1,∆2, ...,∆n)the vector of∆-functions.

(23)

Efficient Dosing Regimens

Notation

D= (d1,d2, ..., dn)denotes a vector of dosesdi that are administered atnoccasions, adosing regimen.

Ci(t,d1, . . . ,di)denotes the concentration of the drug at timet after dosesd1, . . . ,di are administered.

Functions∆i:D7→R≥0, D⊂Ri≥0,i=1, . . . ,n, are such that,

i(d1, . . . ,di) = Z ti

ti−1

|C(t,d1, . . . ,di)−Ctgt|dt,

whereCtgtdenotes the target concentration.

The∆-functions measure theareas of under- and over-exposurearound the target concentration.

We denote by∆= (∆1,∆2, ...,∆n)the vector of∆-functions.

(24)

Efficient Dosing Regimens

Criteria of Efficiency

LetD= [0,dmax]nbe the class of all dosing regimensD, where dmaxis the maximum dose which can be administered.

Definition (ϕA-efficiency)

A regimenD? = (d1, . . . ,dn)∈Dis calledϕA-efficient if the function

ϕA(∆) = 1 n

n

X

i=1

i

is minimized byD? or equivalently

n

X

i=1

i

n

X

i=1

i

for allD∈D, where∆i = ∆i(d1, ...,di),i=1, ...,n.

(25)

Efficient Dosing Regimens

Criteria of Efficiency

LetD= [0,dmax]nbe the class of all dosing regimensD, where dmaxis the maximum dose which can be administered.

Definition (ϕA-efficiency)

A regimenD? = (d1, . . . ,dn)∈Dis calledϕA-efficient if the function

ϕA(∆) = 1 n

n

X

i=1

i

is minimized byD? or equivalently

n

X

i=1

i

n

X

i=1

i

for allD∈D, where∆i = ∆i(d1, ...,di),i=1, ...,n.

(26)

Efficient Dosing Regimens

Criteria of Efficiency

LetD= [0,dmax]nbe the class of all dosing regimensD, where dmaxis the maximum dose which can be administered.

Definition (ϕA-efficiency)

A regimenD? = (d1, . . . ,dn)∈Dis calledϕA-efficient if the function

ϕA(∆) = 1 n

n

X

i=1

i

is minimized byD? or equivalently

n

X

i=1

i

n

X

i=1

i

for allD∈D, where∆i = ∆i(d1, ...,di),i=1, ...,n.

(27)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Let

Lki ={di1k,di2k,di3k}

be the set of 3 possible doses (dose sets) that can be

administered at theith occasion,i=1, ...,n, andk-th iteration, k=1,2, ...,w.

Thus, the number of possible dosing regimens in this case is3n. Iteration No. 1

Set

L1i ={10%ofdmax, 50%of dmax, dmax} for alli=1, . . . ,n.

For each of the3ndosing regimens, we computeϕ(∆). D1 is the dosing regimen which minimizesϕ(∆).

(28)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Let

Lki ={di1k,di2k,di3k}

be the set of 3 possible doses (dose sets) that can be

administered at theith occasion,i=1, ...,n, andk-th iteration, k=1,2, ...,w.

Thus, the number of possible dosing regimens in this case is3n. Iteration No. 1

Set

L1i ={10%ofdmax, 50%of dmax, dmax} for alli=1, . . . ,n.

For each of the3ndosing regimens, we computeϕ(∆). D1 is the dosing regimen which minimizesϕ(∆).

(29)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Let

Lki ={di1k,di2k,di3k}

be the set of 3 possible doses (dose sets) that can be

administered at theith occasion,i=1, ...,n, andk-th iteration, k=1,2, ...,w.

Thus, the number of possible dosing regimens in this case is3n.

Iteration No. 1 Set

L1i ={10%ofdmax, 50%of dmax, dmax} for alli=1, . . . ,n.

For each of the3ndosing regimens, we computeϕ(∆). D1 is the dosing regimen which minimizesϕ(∆).

(30)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Let

Lki ={di1k,di2k,di3k}

be the set of 3 possible doses (dose sets) that can be

administered at theith occasion,i=1, ...,n, andk-th iteration, k=1,2, ...,w.

Thus, the number of possible dosing regimens in this case is3n. Iteration No. 1

Set

L1i ={10%ofdmax, 50%of dmax, dmax} for alli=1, . . . ,n.

For each of the3ndosing regimens, we computeϕ(∆). D1 is the dosing regimen which minimizesϕ(∆).

(31)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Let

Lki ={di1k,di2k,di3k}

be the set of 3 possible doses (dose sets) that can be

administered at theith occasion,i=1, ...,n, andk-th iteration, k=1,2, ...,w.

Thus, the number of possible dosing regimens in this case is3n. Iteration No. 1

Set

L1i ={10%ofdmax, 50%of dmax, dmax} for alli=1, . . . ,n.

For each of the3ndosing regimens, we computeϕ(∆). D1 is the dosing regimen which minimizesϕ(∆).

(32)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Let

Lki ={di1k,di2k,di3k}

be the set of 3 possible doses (dose sets) that can be

administered at theith occasion,i=1, ...,n, andk-th iteration, k=1,2, ...,w.

Thus, the number of possible dosing regimens in this case is3n. Iteration No. 1

Set

L1i ={10%ofdmax, 50%of dmax, dmax} for alli=1, . . . ,n.

For each of the3ndosing regimens, we computeϕ(∆).

D1 is the dosing regimen which minimizesϕ(∆).

(33)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Let

Lki ={di1k,di2k,di3k}

be the set of 3 possible doses (dose sets) that can be

administered at theith occasion,i=1, ...,n, andk-th iteration, k=1,2, ...,w.

Thus, the number of possible dosing regimens in this case is3n. Iteration No. 1

Set

L1i ={10%ofdmax, 50%of dmax, dmax} for alli=1, . . . ,n.

For each of the3ndosing regimens, we computeϕ(∆).

D1 is the dosing regimen which minimizesϕ(∆).

(34)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Iteration No. k

The dose setsLki are reconstituted based on the doses inDk−1. For example, ifdi3k−1was selected for i-th occasion in iteration k−1, the new dose set will be:

Lki = (

×di3k−1,di3k−1,min di3k−1 ,dmax

!) .

where∈(0,1)is a fixed constant, called theresolution. For each of the3ndosing regimens, we computeϕ(∆). Dk is the dosing regimen which minimizesϕ(∆).

(35)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Iteration No. k

The dose setsLki are reconstituted based on the doses inDk−1.

For example, ifdi3k−1was selected for i-th occasion in iteration k−1, the new dose set will be:

Lki = (

×di3k−1,di3k−1,min di3k−1 ,dmax

!) .

where∈(0,1)is a fixed constant, called theresolution. For each of the3ndosing regimens, we computeϕ(∆). Dk is the dosing regimen which minimizesϕ(∆).

(36)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Iteration No. k

The dose setsLki are reconstituted based on the doses inDk−1. For example, ifdi3k−1was selected fori-th occasion in iteration k−1, the new dose set will be:

Lki = (

×di3k−1,di3k−1,min di3k−1 ,dmax

!) .

where∈(0,1)is a fixed constant, called theresolution.

For each of the3ndosing regimens, we computeϕ(∆). Dk is the dosing regimen which minimizesϕ(∆).

(37)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Iteration No. k

The dose setsLki are reconstituted based on the doses inDk−1. For example, ifdi3k−1was selected fori-th occasion in iteration k−1, the new dose set will be:

Lki = (

×di3k−1,di3k−1,min di3k−1 ,dmax

!) .

where∈(0,1)is a fixed constant, called theresolution.

For each of the3ndosing regimens, we computeϕ(∆).

Dk is the dosing regimen which minimizesϕ(∆).

(38)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Iteration No. k

The dose setsLki are reconstituted based on the doses inDk−1. For example, ifdi3k−1was selected fori-th occasion in iteration k−1, the new dose set will be:

Lki = (

×di3k−1,di3k−1,min di3k−1 ,dmax

!) .

where∈(0,1)is a fixed constant, called theresolution.

For each of the3ndosing regimens, we computeϕ(∆).

Dk is the dosing regimen which minimizesϕ(∆).

(39)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Terminal Iteration No.w

The algorithm is terminated atwth iteration if diw =diw−1 ∀ i=1, ... ,n,

wheredik denotes the optimal dose to be administered at theith occasion, at thekth iteration.

Thus, the algorithm terminates when for the given resolution, no further improvement is possible.

By choosing appropriate resolution,Dwcan be driven as close as required to the most efficient dosing regimenD?.

(40)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Terminal Iteration No.w

The algorithm is terminated atwth iteration if diw =diw−1 ∀ i=1, ... ,n,

wheredik denotes the optimal dose to be administered at theith occasion, at thekth iteration.

Thus, the algorithm terminates when for the given resolution, no further improvement is possible.

By choosing appropriate resolution,Dwcan be driven as close as required to the most efficient dosing regimenD?.

(41)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Terminal Iteration No.w

The algorithm is terminated atwth iteration if diw =diw−1 ∀ i=1, ... ,n,

wheredik denotes the optimal dose to be administered at theith occasion, at thekth iteration.

Thus, the algorithm terminates when for the given resolution, no further improvement is possible.

By choosing appropriate resolution,Dwcan be driven as close as required to the most efficient dosing regimenD?.

(42)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Terminal Iteration No.w

The algorithm is terminated atwth iteration if diw =diw−1 ∀ i=1, ... ,n,

wheredik denotes the optimal dose to be administered at theith occasion, at thekth iteration.

Thus, the algorithm terminates when for the given resolution, no further improvement is possible.

By choosing appropriate resolution,Dwcan be driven as close as required to the most efficient dosing regimenD?.

(43)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Properties

Theorem

The ED Algorithm converges to the true unknownϕ-efficient dosing regimenD?when the resolution tends to 1, that is

→1 ⇒Dw→D?.

The major argument in the proof is that the unknown true optimal dosesdilie in the respective intervals, that is

di?

diw,min diw

,dmax

.

(44)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Properties

Theorem

The ED Algorithm converges to the true unknownϕ-efficient dosing regimenD?when the resolution tends to 1, that is

→1 ⇒Dw→D?.

The major argument in the proof is that the unknown true optimal dosesdilie in the respective intervals, that is

di?

diw,min diw

,dmax

.

(45)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Properties

We can decrease the under- and over-exposure by planning more frequent dosing.

C(t)whenτ =3h. C(t)whenτ =8h. ϕA(∆|.99) =0.5284. ϕA(∆|.99) =3.4515.

(46)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Properties

We can decrease the under- and over-exposure by planning more frequent dosing.

C(t)whenτ =3h. C(t)whenτ =8h. ϕA(∆|.99) =0.5284. ϕA(∆|.99) =3.4515.

(47)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Properties

We can decrease the under- and over-exposure by planning more frequent dosing.

C(t)whenτ =3h. C(t)whenτ =8h. ϕA(∆|.99) =0.5284. ϕA(∆|.99) =3.4515.

(48)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Properties

We can decrease the under- and over-exposure by planning more frequent dosing.

C(t)whenτ =3h. C(t)whenτ =8h.

ϕA(∆|.99) =0.5284. ϕA(∆|.99) =3.4515.

(49)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Properties

We can decrease the under- and over-exposure by planning more frequent dosing.

C(t)whenτ =3h. C(t)whenτ =8h.

ϕA(∆|.99) =0.5284. ϕA(∆|.99) =3.4515.

(50)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Example: one-compartment model

C(t,d) = FdKa

V(Ka−Ke)(e−Ket−e−Kat), where

Ka andKe denote the absorption and elimination rate constants, Vis the volume of distribution,

Fis the bio-availability.

For the calculations we take the following estimates of the parameters

( ˆKa, Kˆe, V,ˆ F) = (0.37ˆ h−1, 0.2h−1, 24L, 0.95). Also,Ctgt=3mg L−1anddmax =250mgand we considern=7 occasions to administer the drug withτj=6h,j=1, ...,7so that T=42.

(51)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Example: one-compartment model

C(t,d) = FdKa

V(Ka−Ke)(e−Ket−e−Kat), where

Ka andKe denote the absorption and elimination rate constants, Vis the volume of distribution,

Fis the bio-availability.

For the calculations we take the following estimates of the parameters

( ˆKa, Kˆe, V,ˆ F) = (0.37ˆ h−1, 0.2h−1, 24L, 0.95). Also,Ctgt=3mg L−1anddmax =250mgand we considern=7 occasions to administer the drug withτj=6h,j=1, ...,7so that T=42.

(52)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Example: one-compartment model

C(t,d) = FdKa

V(Ka−Ke)(e−Ket−e−Kat), where

Ka andKe denote the absorption and elimination rate constants, Vis the volume of distribution,

Fis the bio-availability.

For the calculations we take the following estimates of the parameters

( ˆKa, Kˆe, V,ˆ F) = (0.37ˆ h−1, 0.2h−1, 24L, 0.95).

Also,Ctgt=3mg L−1anddmax =250mgand we considern=7 occasions to administer the drug withτj=6h,j=1, ...,7so that T=42.

(53)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Example: one-compartment model

C(t,d) = FdKa

V(Ka−Ke)(e−Ket−e−Kat), where

Ka andKe denote the absorption and elimination rate constants, Vis the volume of distribution,

Fis the bio-availability.

For the calculations we take the following estimates of the parameters

( ˆKa, Kˆe, V,ˆ F) = (0.37ˆ h−1, 0.2h−1, 24L, 0.95).

Also,Ctgt=3mg L−1anddmax =250mgand we considern=7 occasions to administer the drug withτj=6h,j=1, ...,7so that T=42.

(54)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Example: one-compartment model

At resolution of=0.99,ϕA-efficient dosing regimen is D= (163.87, 69.04, 92.12, 87.00, 87.88, 88.49, 87.88).

The concentration profile is shown below.

(55)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Example: one-compartment model

At resolution of=0.99,ϕA-efficient dosing regimen is D= (163.87, 69.04, 92.12, 87.00, 87.88, 88.49, 87.88). The concentration profile is shown below.

(56)

Efficient Dosing Algorithm

Example: one-compartment model

The algorithm converged in 84 iterations (=0.99).

Convergence ofφA(∆). Convergence ofD= (d1, . . . ,d7).

(57)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Let the ratio of drug A to drug B in the tablet be1:θ. The problem then is two-fold:

Find the optimal ratioθin which the drugs should be combined and find the most efficient dosing regimenD?for the tablet.

I We have two target concentrationsCAtgtandCBtgt.

I The dosing regimen for the tablet will be DA+DB =DA(1+θ)

I We minimize

ϕC(∆) =ωϕAA(∆) + (1−ω)ϕBA(∆) whereω is a weighting constant.

(58)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Let the ratio of drug A to drug B in the tablet be1:θ.

The problem then is two-fold:

Find the optimal ratioθin which the drugs should be combined and find the most efficient dosing regimenD?for the tablet.

I We have two target concentrationsCAtgtandCBtgt.

I The dosing regimen for the tablet will be DA+DB =DA(1+θ)

I We minimize

ϕC(∆) =ωϕAA(∆) + (1−ω)ϕBA(∆) whereω is a weighting constant.

(59)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Let the ratio of drug A to drug B in the tablet be1:θ.

The problem then is two-fold:

Find the optimal ratioθin which the drugs should be combined and find the most efficient dosing regimenD?for the tablet.

I We have two target concentrationsCAtgtandCBtgt.

I The dosing regimen for the tablet will be DA+DB =DA(1+θ)

I We minimize

ϕC(∆) =ωϕAA(∆) + (1−ω)ϕBA(∆) whereω is a weighting constant.

(60)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Let the ratio of drug A to drug B in the tablet be1:θ.

The problem then is two-fold:

Find the optimal ratioθin which the drugs should be combined and find the most efficient dosing regimenD?for the tablet.

I We have two target concentrationsCAtgtandCBtgt.

I The dosing regimen for the tablet will be DA+DB =DA(1+θ)

I We minimize

ϕC(∆) =ωϕAA(∆) + (1−ω)ϕBA(∆) whereω is a weighting constant.

(61)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Let the ratio of drug A to drug B in the tablet be1:θ.

The problem then is two-fold:

Find the optimal ratioθin which the drugs should be combined and find the most efficient dosing regimenD?for the tablet.

I We have two target concentrationsCAtgtandCBtgt.

I The dosing regimen for the tablet will be DA+DB =DA(1+θ)

I We minimize

ϕC(∆) =ωϕAA(∆) + (1−ω)ϕBA(∆) whereω is a weighting constant.

(62)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Let the ratio of drug A to drug B in the tablet be1:θ.

The problem then is two-fold:

Find the optimal ratioθin which the drugs should be combined and find the most efficient dosing regimenD?for the tablet.

I We have two target concentrationsCAtgtandCBtgt.

I The dosing regimen for the tablet will be DA+DB =DA(1+θ)

I We minimize

ϕC(∆) =ωϕAA(∆) + (1−ω)ϕBA(∆) whereω is a weighting constant.

(63)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Let the ratio of drug A to drug B in the tablet be1:θ.

The problem then is two-fold:

Find the optimal ratioθin which the drugs should be combined and find the most efficient dosing regimenD?for the tablet.

I We have two target concentrationsCAtgtandCBtgt.

I The dosing regimen for the tablet will be DA+DB =DA(1+θ)

I We minimize

ϕC(∆) =ωϕAA(∆) + (1−ω)ϕBA(∆) whereω is a weighting constant.

(64)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Example: CoartemR

This is a combination of two drugs: 1. Arthemether (A)

2. Lumefantrine (B)

The current dosing regimen with the ration ofθ=6over three days gives a typical concentration profile as shown in the figure below.

(65)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Example: CoartemR

This is a combination of two drugs:

1. Arthemether (A) 2. Lumefantrine (B)

The current dosing regimen with the ration ofθ=6over three days gives a typical concentration profile as shown in the figure below.

(66)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Example: CoartemR

This is a combination of two drugs:

1. Arthemether (A) 2. Lumefantrine (B)

The current dosing regimen with the ration ofθ=6over three days gives a typical concentration profile as shown in the figure below.

(67)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Example: CoartemR

Alternative Regimen ITheEfficient Dosing Algorithmis applied keeping the same times of dosing and the same number of doses.

The Figure below shows the concentration profile of the two drugs for the optimum regimenD?I, withθ? =8.24.

(68)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Example: CoartemR

Alternative Regimen ITheEfficient Dosing Algorithmis applied keeping the same times of dosing and the same number of doses.

The Figure below shows the concentration profile of the two drugs for the optimum regimenD?I, withθ? =8.24.

(69)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Example: CoartemR

Alternative Regimen IITheEfficient Dosing Algorithmis applied with a different dosing schedule, 7 doses instead of 6 over the period of three days.

The Figure below shows the concentration profile of the two drugs for the optimum regimenD?II, withθ?=7.21.

(70)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Example: CoartemR

Alternative Regimen IITheEfficient Dosing Algorithmis applied with a different dosing schedule, 7 doses instead of 6 over the period of three days.

The Figure below shows the concentration profile of the two drugs for the optimum regimenD?II, withθ? =7.21.

(71)

Extension: Combination of two drugs

Example: CoartemR

Comparison of the dosing regimens and the combination ratios.

Dosing Regimen θ φC

DA= (80.0,80.0,80.0,80.0,80.0,80.0)

DB= (480.0,480.0,480.0,480.0,480.0,480.0) 6.00 135.2 DAI = (60.6,46.7,49.6,49.6,49.4,39.3)

DBI= (499.7,384.8,408.7,408.7,407.3,324.4) 8.24 106.8 DAII = (60.6,67.7,42.2,43.8,48.9,49.4,45.1)

DBII= (437.2,488.3,304.5,315.9,352.8,356.4,325.6) 7.21 80.7

(72)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Population PK Model

We consider the compartment model: C(t,d,β) = dKa

V(Ka−Ke)(e−Ket−e−Kat), whereβ= (Ka,Ke,V)are unknown parameters, Ka is the absorption rate constant,

Ke is the elimination rate constant, Vis the volume of distribution.

The aim is to maintain a target concentration, Ctgt=5mg/L for T =40h

by administeringn=5doses attk =0,8,16,24,32h.

(73)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Population PK Model

We consider the compartment model:

C(t,d,β) = dKa

V(Ka−Ke)(e−Ket−e−Kat), whereβ= (Ka,Ke,V)are unknown parameters, Ka is the absorption rate constant,

Ke is the elimination rate constant, Vis the volume of distribution.

The aim is to maintain a target concentration, Ctgt=5mg/L for T =40h

by administeringn=5doses attk =0,8,16,24,32h.

(74)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Population PK Model

We consider the compartment model:

C(t,d,β) = dKa

V(Ka−Ke)(e−Ket−e−Kat), whereβ= (Ka,Ke,V)are unknown parameters, Ka is the absorption rate constant,

Ke is the elimination rate constant, Vis the volume of distribution.

The aim is to maintain a target concentration, Ctgt=5mg/L for T =40h

by administeringn=5doses attk =0,8,16,24,32h.

(75)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Population PK model

We take the stage 1 model as

yij=C(tij,dij)exp{eij}, di = (d1, . . . ,di), βj = (Kaj,Kej,Vj)

and the stage 2 model as

 Kaj

Kej

Vj

=

Kaexp{bKaj} Keexp{bKej} Vexp{bVj}

,

where

eij∼ N(0, σ2), bj=

 bKaj

bKej

bVj

∼ N3(0,Ω)

andeijare independent frombj.

(76)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Population PK model

We take the stage 1 model as

yij=C(tij,dij)exp{eij}, di = (d1, . . . ,di), βj = (Kaj,Kej,Vj)

and the stage 2 model as

 Kaj

Kej Vj

=

Kaexp{bKaj} Keexp{bKej} Vexp{bVj}

,

where

eij∼ N(0, σ2), bj=

 bKaj

bKej

bVj

∼ N3(0,Ω)

andeijare independent frombj.

(77)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Population PK model

We take the stage 1 model as

yij=C(tij,dij)exp{eij}, di = (d1, . . . ,di), βj = (Kaj,Kej,Vj)

and the stage 2 model as

 Kaj

Kej Vj

=

Kaexp{bKaj} Keexp{bKej} Vexp{bVj}

,

where

eij∼ N(0, σ2), bj=

 bKaj

bKej

bVj

∼ N3(0,Ω)

andeijare independent frombj.

(78)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial

At stagekof the Trial:

Step 1 Apply the ED algorithm to determine the efficient dosing regimenDk for givenβˆk−1.

Step 2 Administer the dosing regimenDk to thekthcohort. Step 3 Obtain the PK responses at the respective

D-optimal sampling time points.

Step 4 Obtain the estimates of the PK parameters asβˆk. Step 5 Stop the trial if the stopping rule is met, otherwise

set k = k + 1 and repeat steps 1-4.

Step 6 Analyze the gathered data to recommend the best possible dosing regimen.

(79)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial

At stagekof the Trial:

Step 1 Apply the ED algorithm to determine the efficient dosing regimenDk for givenβˆk−1.

Step 2 Administer the dosing regimenDk to thekthcohort. Step 3 Obtain the PK responses at the respective

D-optimal sampling time points.

Step 4 Obtain the estimates of the PK parameters asβˆk. Step 5 Stop the trial if the stopping rule is met, otherwise

set k = k + 1 and repeat steps 1-4.

Step 6 Analyze the gathered data to recommend the best possible dosing regimen.

(80)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial

At stagekof the Trial:

Step 1 Apply the ED algorithm to determine the efficient dosing regimenDk for givenβˆk−1.

Step 2 Administer the dosing regimenDk to thekthcohort. Step 3 Obtain the PK responses at the respective

D-optimal sampling time points.

Step 4 Obtain the estimates of the PK parameters asβˆk. Step 5 Stop the trial if the stopping rule is met, otherwise

set k = k + 1 and repeat steps 1-4.

Step 6 Analyze the gathered data to recommend the best possible dosing regimen.

(81)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial

At stagekof the Trial:

Step 1 Apply the ED algorithm to determine the efficient dosing regimenDk for givenβˆk−1.

Step 2 Administer the dosing regimenDk to thekthcohort.

Step 3 Obtain the PK responses at the respective D-optimal sampling time points.

Step 4 Obtain the estimates of the PK parameters asβˆk. Step 5 Stop the trial if the stopping rule is met, otherwise

set k = k + 1 and repeat steps 1-4.

Step 6 Analyze the gathered data to recommend the best possible dosing regimen.

(82)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial

At stagekof the Trial:

Step 1 Apply the ED algorithm to determine the efficient dosing regimenDk for givenβˆk−1.

Step 2 Administer the dosing regimenDk to thekthcohort.

Step 3 Obtain the PK responses at the respective D-optimal sampling time points.

Step 4 Obtain the estimates of the PK parameters asβˆk. Step 5 Stop the trial if the stopping rule is met, otherwise

set k = k + 1 and repeat steps 1-4.

Step 6 Analyze the gathered data to recommend the best possible dosing regimen.

(83)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial

At stagekof the Trial:

Step 1 Apply the ED algorithm to determine the efficient dosing regimenDk for givenβˆk−1.

Step 2 Administer the dosing regimenDk to thekthcohort.

Step 3 Obtain the PK responses at the respective D-optimal sampling time points.

Step 4 Obtain the estimates of the PK parameters asβˆk.

Step 5 Stop the trial if the stopping rule is met, otherwise set k = k + 1 and repeat steps 1-4.

Step 6 Analyze the gathered data to recommend the best possible dosing regimen.

(84)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial

At stagekof the Trial:

Step 1 Apply the ED algorithm to determine the efficient dosing regimenDk for givenβˆk−1.

Step 2 Administer the dosing regimenDk to thekthcohort.

Step 3 Obtain the PK responses at the respective D-optimal sampling time points.

Step 4 Obtain the estimates of the PK parameters asβˆk. Step 5 Stop the trial if the stopping rule is met, otherwise

set k = k + 1 and repeat steps 1-4.

Step 6 Analyze the gathered data to recommend the best possible dosing regimen.

(85)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial

At stagekof the Trial:

Step 1 Apply the ED algorithm to determine the efficient dosing regimenDk for givenβˆk−1.

Step 2 Administer the dosing regimenDk to thekthcohort.

Step 3 Obtain the PK responses at the respective D-optimal sampling time points.

Step 4 Obtain the estimates of the PK parameters asβˆk. Step 5 Stop the trial if the stopping rule is met, otherwise

set k = k + 1 and repeat steps 1-4.

Step 6 Analyze the gathered data to recommend the best possible dosing regimen.

(86)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial: Simulation Study

For the simulation we assume the true population parameters beβ= (Ka,Ke,V) = (.85, .15, 17),σ2=.01and

Ω=

.015 0 0

0 .015 .005 0 .005 .005

.

Based on these parameters, the efficient dose regimen is: D = (145,90,95,95,95)

withϕ(∆5) =7.13.

(87)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial: Simulation Study

For the simulation we assume the true population parameters beβ= (Ka,Ke,V) = (.85, .15, 17),σ2=.01and

Ω=

.015 0 0

0 .015 .005 0 .005 .005

.

Based on these parameters, the efficient dose regimen is:

D = (145,90,95,95,95) withϕ(∆5) =7.13.

(88)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial: Simulation Study

The dosing regimen for the true model parameters and the D-optimum sampling timesξ?={0.10, 4.77,61.88}

(89)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Population Variability

Simulated profiles of concentration of a 100 patients

(90)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial: Simulation Study

We assume that some prior knowledge about the PK

parameters and population variability is available from previous studies.

Here we haveβ0=(1.5, .25, 13)T02=.5and

0=

.3 0 0

0 .4 .6 0 .6 .5

.

The parameters to be estimated are Ψk = βkk, σk2 whereωk = (ω11k, ω22k, ω33k, ω23k).

(91)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial: Simulation Study

We assume that some prior knowledge about the PK

parameters and population variability is available from previous studies.

Here we haveβ0=(1.5, .25, 13)T02=.5and

0=

.3 0 0

0 .4 .6 0 .6 .5

.

The parameters to be estimated are Ψk = βkk, σk2 whereωk = (ω11k, ω22k, ω33k, ω23k).

(92)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial: Simulation Study

We assume that some prior knowledge about the PK

parameters and population variability is available from previous studies.

Here we haveβ0=(1.5, .25, 13)T02=.5and

0=

.3 0 0

0 .4 .6 0 .6 .5

.

The parameters to be estimated are Ψk = βkk, σk2 whereωk = (ω11k, ω22k, ω33k, ω23k).

(93)

Population Optimum Dose Regimen

Adaptive Clinical Trial: Stopping Rules

Stopping Rules

1 The trial is terminated when the same dose regimen gets administered to two successive cohorts.

2 The trial is terminated at thekth iteration when the dose regimen for the next cohort coincides with D.

3 The trial is terminated at thekth iteration if all the elements ofΨkare within 10% of the true parameters.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Esse texto é uma resenha do livro A Europa de Gutenberg: O Livro e a Invenção da Modernidade Ocidental (Séculos XIII-XVI), do historiador francês Frédéric Barbier, lançado