Este trabalho permitiu concluir que é possível classificar o impacto ambiental de matérias-primas utilizadas em produtos cosméticos por meio de critérios de análises estabelecidos, informações disponíveis em banco de dados, métodos alternativos, cálculo do PEC/PNEC e utilização de uma matriz.
Por meio do desenvolvimento de uma estratégia integrada de análise de matérias-primas, foi demonstrado ser possível a seleção ou substituição de matérias-primas com menor impacto ambiental no desenvolvimento de produtos cosméticos, gerando produtos mais sustentáveis para o meio ambiente.
Com os resultados obtidos pode-se comprovar o claim de “mais sustentável” ou com
“menor impacto ambiental” de forma quantitativa e auxiliar a indústria cosmética a contribuir com a preservação ambiental. Este trabalho é inovador, pois até o momento não existem ferramentas propostas para a avaliação detalhada de produtos cosméticos quanto ao impacto ambiental. Além disso, o presente estudo contribui com a possibilidade da geração de um banco de dados internacional para ser empregado no desenvolvimento de produtos cosméticos mais sustentáveis.
REFERÊNCIAS
AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE ÁGUAS MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE (ANA).
Cadernos de Recursos Hídricos: disponibilidade e demandas de recursos hídricos no Brasil.
Maio, 2005.
ATTWOOD, D et al. Princípios de físico-químicos em Farmácia vol. 4. Edusp, 3º ed. São Paulo, 2003.
BRAUSCH, M. J; RAND, M. G. A review of personal care products in the aquatic
environment: Environmental concentrations and toxicity. Chemosphere. United States, p.
1518-1532, 2010.
BRUNELLI, E., et al. Effects of a sublethal concentration of sodium lauryl sulphate on the morphology and Na+/K+ ATPase activity in the gill of the ornate wrasse (Thalassoma pavo).
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. V.71, p. 436–445.Nov, 2007.
BU, Q; et al. Personal care products in the aquatic environment in China: A review. Journal of Hazardous. School of Environment, THU–VEOLIA Joint Research Center for Advanced Environmental Technology Tsinghua University, State key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control. China, p. 189–211, Aug., 2013.
CARLSSON, C; et al. Are pharmaceuticals potent environmental pollutants? Part II:
Environmental risk assessments of selected pharmaceutical excipientes. Science of the total environment. Sweden, p. 88-95, Jun, 2005.
COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) Nº 358/201 of 9 april 2014. Amending Annexes II and V to Regulation (EC) Nº 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on
Cosmetic Products. April, 2014.
CONCAWE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS ECOLOGY GROUP. Environmental Classification of petroleum substances summary data and rationale Report no. 01/54. Brussels, Oct., 2001.
COSING (COSMETIC INGREDIENTS AND SUBSTANCES). Disponível em: <
http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/cosing/index.cfm?fuseaction=search.simple>.
Acesso em 18 de outubro de 2014.
COWAN-ELLSBERRY, C; et al. Environmental Safety of the Use of Major Surfactant Classes in North America. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology.
United States, v.44, p.1893–1993, 2014.
CRADLE TO CRADLE. Material Health Assessment Methodology Cradle to Cradle CertifiedCM Product Standard Version 3.0. Charlottesville, 2012.
CUMMING, J. L. Environmental Fate, Aquatic Toxicology and Risk Assessment of Polymeric Quaternary Ammonium Salts from Cosmetic Uses. Thesis Griffith School of Environment Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology Group Griffith University.
February, 2008.
DANISH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Survey and Health and Environmental Assesssment of Preservatives in Cosmetic Products Nº 138. Ministry of Environmental and Food. Copenhagen, 2015.
D’AVINO, L; et al., 2015. Environmental implications of crude glycerin used in special products for the metalworking industry and in biodegradable mulching films. Industrial Crops and Products.V. 75,p. 29-35. March, 2015.
DEL ROSARIO, et al. Detection of pharmaceuticals and other personal care products in groundwater beneat and adjacente to onsite wastewater treatment systems in a coastal plain shallow aquifer. Science of the Total Environment. V. 487, p. 216-223. May, 2014.
DOBBINS, L.L; et al. Probabilistic Ecological Hazard Assessment Of Parabens using
Daphnia Magna and Pimephales Promelas Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. v. 28, No 12. p. 2744-2753, Mar., 2009.
EDINBURGH CENTRE FOR TOXICOLOGY. Environmental Risk Assessment. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme)/IPCS (International Programme on Chemical Safety) Training Module No. 3 Section B. Edinburgh, 1999.
ENVIRONMENT AGENCY. UV-Filters in cosmetics – Prioritisation for environmental assessment. Rio House Waterside Drive, Aztec West Almondsbury, Dec., 2008.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA). Guidelines on the information to be contained in environmental impact statements. Ireland, March, 2002.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION DOCUMENT. Screening-level hazard characterization glycol esters category. United Sates, June, 2010.
EUROMONITOR INTERNATIONAL. Disponível em: < www.euromonitor.com>. Acesso em 24 de setembro de 2015.
EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR ECOTOXICOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY OF CHEMICALS.
Environmental Risk Assessment of Difficult Substances, Technical Report No. 88. Brussels, June, 2003.
EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU. Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment.
Apr., 2003.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU. IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 5333-42-6 (Octyldodecanol). Feb., 2000a.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU. IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 105-99-7 (dibutyl adipate). Feb., 2000b.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU. IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 100-51-6 (Benzyl alcohol). Feb., 2000c.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU. IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 56-81-5 (glycerin).Feb., 2000d.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU.IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 122-92-5 (stearyl alcohol). Feb., 2000e.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU.IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 122-99-6 (Phenoxyethanol). Feb., 2000f.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU.IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 102-71-6 (Triethanolamine). Feb., 2000g.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU.IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 107-41-5 (Hexylene glycol). Feb., 2000h.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU.IUCLID Dataset Substance ID:64742-46-7 (C13-14 Alkane). Feb., 2000i.
HASHMI, M.Z et al. Hormetic Responses of Food-Supplied Pcb 31 to Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) Growth. Dose Response. United States, 2015.
HERMANN, H; et al. Aquatic ecotoxicity of Lanthanum – A review and na attemp to derive water and sediment quality criteria. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. V. 124, p.
213-238. Nov, 2015.
HOPPER, T.L, et al. Accumulation of triclosan from diet and its neuroendocrine effects in Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus) under two temperature Regimes. Marine Environmental Research. V. 112, p. 52-60. Sept, 2015.
INSTITUTO DE QUÍMICA UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL.
Disponível em: <www.iq.ufrgs,br/ead/fisicoquimica/ordem_um.html >. Acesso em: 29 de outubro de 2015.
JOHANSSON, O; et al. Literature Survey of Surfactants in the Nordic Countries. Goodpoint AB. Nov., 2012.
KIMURA, K; et al. Occurence of preservatives and antimicrobials in Japanese rivers.
Chemosphere. V. 107, p. 393-399. Feb, 2014.
KONNECKER, G. et al. Environmental properties and aquatic hazard assessment of anionic surfactants: physico-chemical, environmental fate and ecotoxicity properties. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. United States, p.1445-1460, April, 2011.
LEOPOLD, L.B. et al. A procedure for evaluating environmental impact. U. S. Geological Survey. Washington, 1971.
LIBRALTO, G; et al. Seawater ecotoxicity of monoethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine. Journal of Hazardous Materials. V. 176, p. 535-539. Nov, 2009.
MCMARTIN, K. Propylene Glycol. Encyclopedia of Toxicology (Third Edition). P.1113–
1116. Sept, 2014.
MANOVÁ, E; et al. Organic UV filters in personal care products in Switzerland: A survey of occurrence and concentrations. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. V. 216, p. 508– 514. Aug, 2012.
MONTAGNER, C. C; et al. Occurrence and potential risk of triclosan in freshwaters of São Paulo, Brazil—the need for regulatory actions. Environ Sci Pollut Res. Berlin, August, 2013.
NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT–RTP DIVISION OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY (EPA). Nanomaterial Case Studies: Nanoscale Titanium Dioxide in Water Treatment and in Topical Sunscreen.EPA/600/R-09/057F. Nov., 2010.
NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS NOTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT SCHEME (NICNAS). Polymer of low concern public report.Tilamar Fix A1000 File No PLC/1015. May, 2012.
NICNAS NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS NOTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT SCHEME (NICNAS). Priority Existing Chemical Assessment Report No. 30. GPO Box 58, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia. Jan., 2009.
OFFICE OF POLLUTION PREVENTION AND TOXICS U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA). Design for the Environment Program Alternatives Assessment Criteria for Hazard Evaluation. United States of America. Aug., 2011.
OFFICE OF PREVENTION PESTICIDES, AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA). Inert Reassessment of Methyl p-Hydroxybenzoate (methylparaben). Washington, DC, p. 1-15. Set, 2005.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD).
Guideline for testing of chemicals Ready Biodegradability (301 B). July, 1992.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD).
Guidelines for the testing of chemicals Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test (201). July, 2002.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD).
Guidelines for the testing of chemicals Partition Coefficient (n-octanol/water): Shake Flask Method (107). July 1995.
PUBMED. Disponível em: <https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Methyl_4-hydroxybenzoate#section=Vapor-Pressure > Acesso em 15 de outubro de 2015.
PUBMED.Disponível em:
<http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/DSorbitol#section=Top> Acesso em: 10 de outubro de 2015.
REGULATION (EC) No 1272/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 2008. Official Journal of the European Union. Dez., 2008.
RESOLUÇÃO - RDC Nº 29, de 1º de junho de 2012. Regulamento Técnico Mercosul sobre a Lista de Substâncias de Ação Conservante Permitidas para Produtos de Higiene Pessoal, Cosméticos e Perfumes. Brasil, Junho de 2012.
SCENIHR (SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON EMERGING AND NEWLY IDENTIFIED HEALTH RISKS); SCCS (SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON CONSUMER SAFETY);
SCHER (SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS).
Addressing the New Challenges for Risk Assessment. Brussels, Oct, 2012.
SIDS INITIAL ASSESSMENT PROFILE OECD. 1,2--DIHYDROXYPROPANE SIDS Initial Assessment Report for 11th SIAM UNEP Publications. United States, May, 2001.
SIDS INITIAL ASSESSMENT PROFILE. Alkylamidopropyl betaines SIAM 23. P, 17-20 Oct., 2006. Disponível em: <http://webnet.oecd.org/Hpv/ui/handler.axd?id=8e660767-927e-40d7-ae67-d04c7a9e786a> Acesso em: 10 de outubro de 2015.
SILVA et al. Ecotoxicity and genotoxicity of a binary combination of triclosan and
carbendazim to Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. V. 115, p. 279–
290. Feb, 2015.
SOBEK, A., et al. In the shadow of the Cosmetic Directive — Inconsistencies in EU environmental hazard classification requirements for UV-filters. Science of the Total
Environment. Department of Applied Environmental Science (ITM), Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm. Sweden, p.461-462, May, 2013.
STEPAN COMPANY SUBMITTED TO THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Sodium sulphate (sodium laureth sulfate; CAS NO. 3088-3 l-l): Test Plan. May, 2006.
SUN, X.X; et al. Screening of surfactants for harmful algal blooms mitigation. Marine Pollution Bulletin. V. 48, p. 937-945, 2004.
TOLLS, J; et al. Environmental Safety Aspects of Personal Care Products— A European Perspective. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. United States,Vol. 28, p. 2485–
2489, 2009.
TOXICOLOGY/REGULATORY SERVICES, INC. Fatty Nitrogen Derived Cationics Category High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals Challenge.Test Plan. Dec., 2001.
TOXNET. Disponível em:
<http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgibin/sis/search/a?dbs+hsdb:@term+@DOCNO+203> Acesso em: 15 de outubro de 2015.
TOXNET. Disponível em:
<http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgibin/sis/search/a?dbs+hsdb:@term+@DOCNO+5634 > Acesso em 10de outubro de 2015.
TSUI et al. Occurrence, distribution and ecological risk assessment of multiple classes of UV filters in surface waters from different countries. Water research. China, V. 6, p. 55-65. Sept, 2014.
TSUI et al. Occurrence, distribution and ecological risk assessment of multiple classes of UV filters in marine sediments in Hong Kong and Japan. Journal of Hazardous Materials. V.
292, p. 180–187. March, 2015.
WILLING, A. Lubricants based on renewable resources ± an environmentally compatible alternative to mineral oil products. Chemosphere. Germany, v.43, p. 89-98, 2001.
CONCLUSÕES
Inicialmente este trabalho revisa os principais critérios estabelecidos pelos órgãos de maior relevância internacional, além dos métodos biotecnológicos alternativos atualmente disponíveis, visando uma análise do impacto ambiental aquático gerado por matérias primas de produtos cosméticos enxaguáveis. O presente estudo aborda e compara os parâmetros estabelecidos por órgãos internacionais como Environmental Proctetion Agency (EPA), Cradle to Cradle (C2C) e Regulamento Europeu 1272/2008 para a avaliação do impacto ambiental. Os parâmetros de ecotoxicidade das principais classes de matérias-primas constituintes dos produtos cosméticos enxaguáveis foram definidos, possibilitando o desenvolvimento de produtos mais sustentáveis para o meio ambiente, priorizando substâncias que ofereçam menor impacto ambiental.
Em seguida, este estudo disponibiliza uma ferramenta integrada de análise para classificação de matérias-primas utilizadas em produtos cosméticos enxaguáveis por meio dos critérios de análise estabelecidos, banco de dados, métodos alternativos e da matriz para a análise do impacto ambiental. Esta ferramenta foi aplicada em 40 matérias primas de diferentes classes (filtros solares, emolientes, umectantes, tensoativos e conservantes) e permitiu a seleção daquelas com menor impacto ambiental, ou ainda a substituição em formulações existentes, gerando assim produtos mais sustentáveis para o meio ambiente. Com os resultados obtidos neste estudo pode-se comprovar o claim de mais sustentável ou com menor impacto ambiental de forma quantitativa. Além disso, este trabalho contribui com a possibilidade da geração de um banco de dados internacional para ser empregado no desenvolvimento de produtos cosméticos mais sustentáveis, preservando o meio ambiente.
REFERÊNCIAS
AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE ÁGUAS MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE (ANA).
Cadernos de Recursos Hídricos: disponibilidade e demandas de recursos hídricos no Brasil.
Maio, 2005.
ATTWOOD, D et al. Princípios de físico-químicos em Farmácia vol. 4. Edusp, 3º ed. São Paulo, 2003.
AUSTRALIAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY. Environmental Risk Assessment Guidance Manual for industrial chemicals. Published by the Environment Protection and Heritage Council., February 2009.
BLAIR, B. D, et al. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products found in the Great Lakes above concentrations of environmental concern. Chemosphere. United States, v. 93 p. 2116–
2123. July, 2013.
BOXALL, A; et al. Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment: What Are the Big Questions? Environmental Health Perspectives. V. 120 n. 9. Sept, 2012.
BRAUNBECK, T; LAMMER, E. Fish Embryo Toxicity Assays. Prepared for German Federal Environmental Agency. Dessau, March, 2006.
BRAUSCH, M. J; RAND, M. G. A review of personal care products in the aquatic
environment: Environmental concentrations and toxicity. Chemosphere. United States, p.
1518-1532, 2010.
BRUNELLI, E., et al. Effects of a sublethal concentration of sodium lauryl sulphate on the morphology and Na+/K+ ATPase activity in the gill of the ornate wrasse (Thalassoma pavo).
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. V.71, p. 436–445.Nov, 2007.
BU, Q; et al. Personal care products in the aquatic environment in China: A review. Journal of Hazardous. School of Environment, THU–VEOLIA Joint Research Center for Advanced Environmental Technology Tsinghua University, State key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control. China, p. 189–211, Aug., 2013.
CARLSSON, C; et al. Are pharmaceuticals potent environmental pollutants? Part II:
Environmental risk assessments of selected pharmaceutical excipientes. Science of the total environment. Sweden, p. 88-95, Jun, 2005.
CASSANI, S; GRAMATICA, P. Identification of potential PBT behavior of personal care products by structural approaches. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy.V. 1, P. 19–27.
Nov, 2015.
CAZARIN, K; et al. Redução, refinamento e substituição do uso de animais em estudos toxicológicos: uma abordagem atual. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Farmacêuticas Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences,.Brasil, vol. 40, n. 3, Set., 2004.
COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) Nº 358/201 of 9 april 2014. Amending Annexes II and V to Regulation (EC) Nº 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on
Cosmetic Products. April, 2014.
CONCAWE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS ECOLOGY GROUP. Environmental Classification of petroleum substances summary data and rationale Report no. 01/54. Brussels, Oct., 2001.
COSING (COSMETIC INGREDIENTS AND SUBSTANCES). Disponível em: <
http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/cosing/index.cfm?fuseaction=search.simple>.
Acesso em 18 de outubro de 2014.
COWAN-ELLSBERRY, C; et al. Environmental Safety of the Use of Major Surfactant Classes in North America. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology.
United States, 44:1893–1993, 2014.
CRADLE TO CRADLE. Material Health Assessment Methodology Cradle to Cradle CertifiedCM Product Standard Version 3.0. Charlottesville, 2012.
CUMMING, J. L. Environmental Fate, Aquatic Toxicology and Risk Assessment of Polymeric Quaternary Ammonium Salts from Cosmetic Uses. Thesis Griffith School of Environment Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology Group Griffith University.
February, 2008.
D’AVINO, L; et al., 2015. Environmental implications of crude glycerin used in special products for the metalworking industry and in biodegradable mulching films. Industrial Crops and Products.V. 75,p. 29-35. March, 2015.
DANISH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Survey and Health and Environmental Assesssment of Preservatives in Cosmetic Products Nº 138. Ministry of Environmental and Food. Copenhagen, 2015.
DEL ROSARIO, et al. Detection of pharmaceuticals and other personal care products in groundwater beneat and adjacente to onsite wastewater treatment systems in a coastal plain shallow aquifer. Science of the Total Environment. V. 487, p. 216-223. May, 2014.
DÍAS-CRUZ, M; BARCELÓ, D. Chemical analysis and ecotoxicological effects of organic UV-absorbing compounds in aquatic ecosystems. Trends in Analytical Chemistry. V.28, P.
708-717. 2009.
DIRECTIVE 2004/38/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2004. Official Journal of the European Union. April, 2004.
DOBBINS, L.L; et al. Probabilistic Ecological Hazard Assessment Of Parabens using
Daphnia Magna and Pimephales Promelas Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. v. 28, No 12. p. 2744-2753, Mar., 2009.
DUDZINA, T; et al. Concentrations of cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes in European cosmetic and personal care products: Prerequisite for human and environmental exposure assessment.
Environment International. V. 62, p. 86-94. Oct, 2013.
EDINBURGH CENTRE FOR TOXICOLOGY. Environmental Risk Assessment. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme)/IPCS (International Programme on Chemical Safety) Training Module No. 3 Section B. Edinburgh, 1999.
ENVIRONMENT AGENCY. UV-Filters in cosmetics – Prioritisation for environmental assessment. Rio House Waterside Drive, Aztec West Almondsbury, Dec., 2008.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA). Guidelines on the information to be contained in environmental impact statements. Ireland, March, 2002.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY EPI SUITE. Disponível em:
<http://www2.epa.gov/tsca-screening-tools/epi-suitetm-estimation-program-interface>.
Acesso em: 25 de outubro de 2015.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION DOCUMENT. Screening-level hazard characterization glycol esters category. United Sates, June, 2010.
EUROMONITOR INTERNATIONAL. Disponível em: < www.euromonitor.com>. Acesso em 24 de setembro de 2015.
EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR ECOTOXICOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY OF CHEMICALS.
Environmental Risk Assessment of Difficult Substances, Technical Report No. 88. Brussels, June, 2003.
EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU. Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment.
Apr., 2003.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU. IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 5333-42-6 (Octyldodecanol). Feb., 2000a.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU. IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 105-99-7 (dibutyl adipate). Feb., 2000b.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU. IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 100-51-6 (Benzyl alcohol). Feb., 2000c.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU. IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 56-81-5 (glycerin).Feb., 2000d.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU.IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 122-92-5 (stearyl alcohol). Feb., 2000e.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU.IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 122-99-6 (Phenoxyethanol). Feb., 2000f.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU.IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 102-71-6 (Triethanolamine). Feb., 2000g.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU.IUCLID Dataset Substance ID: 107-41-5 (Hexylene glycol). Feb., 2000h.
EUROPEAN COMISSION EUROPEAN CHEMICALS BUREAU.IUCLID Dataset Substance ID:64742-46-7 (C13-14 Alkane). Feb., 2000i.
FERRERO, P.G, et al. UV Filters bioaccumulation in fish from Iberian river basins. Science of the Total Environment. P. 518-525. March, 2015.
GAVRILESCU, M; et CHISTI, Y. Biotechnology—a sustainable alternative for chemical industry. Biotechnology Advances. V. 23, p.471-499. May, 2005.
GRINDON C; et al. Integrated Decision-tree Testing Strategies for Environmental Toxicity With Respect to the Requirements of the EU REACH Legislation. ATLA. United Kingdon, v.
36, Suppl. 1, p. 29–42. 2008.
HAMAN, C; et al. Occurence, fate and behavior of parabéns in aquatic environments: A review. Water Research. V.68, p.1-11. Oct, 2014.
HASHMI, M.Z et al. Hormetic Responses of Food-Supplied Pcb 31 to Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) Growth. Dose Response. United States, 2015.
HERMANN, H; et al. Aquatic ecotoxicity of Lanthanum – A review and na attemp to derive water and sediment quality criteria. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. V. 124, p.
213-238. Nov, 2015.
HOPPER, T.L, et al. Accumulation of triclosan from diet and its neuroendocrine effects in Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus) under two temperature Regimes. Marine Environmental Research. V. 112, p. 52-60. Sept, 2015.
INSTITUTO DE QUÍMICA UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL.
Disponível em: <www.iq.ufrgs,br/ead/fisicoquimica/ordem_um.html >. Acesso em: 29 de outubro de 2015.
JJEMBA, K. Excretion and ecotoxicity of pharmaceutical and personal care products in the environment. Ecotoxicology and Environment Safety.Nov., p. 113-130, 2004.
JOHANSSON, O; et al. Literature Survey of Surfactants in the Nordic Countries. Goodpoint AB. Nov., 2012.
KAISER, D; et al. Ecotoxicological effect characterisation of widely used organic UV filters.
Environmental Pollution. V. 163, p.84-90. Dec, 2011.
KALOGERAKIS, N; et al. The role of environmental biotechnology in exploring, exploiting, monitoring, preserving, protecting and decontaminating the marine environment. New
Biotechnology. V. 32, p. 157-167. Jan, 2015.
KIM, J.W et al. Acute toxicity of pharmaceutical and personal care products on freshwater crustacean (Thamnocephalus platyurus) and fish (Oryzias latipes). The Journal of
Toxicological Sciences. Japan, v. 34, p. 227-232. Dec, 2008.
KIMURA, K; et al. Occurence of preservatives and antimicrobials in Japanese rivers.
Chemosphere. V. 107, p. 393-399. Feb, 2014.
KONNECKER, G. et al. Environmental properties and aquatic hazard assessment of anionic surfactants: physico-chemical, environmental fate and ecotoxicity properties. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. United States, p.1445-1460, April, 2011.
KRUHLAK, N; et al. Progress in QSAR toxicity screening of pharmaceutical impurities and other FDA regulated products. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. v. 59 p. 43–55. Nov, 2006.
LECHUGA, M; et al. Acute Toxicity of Anionic and Non-ionic surfactants to aquatic organisms. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. V. 125, p. 1-8. Nov, 2015.
LEOPOLD, L.B. et al. A procedure for evaluating environmental impact. U. S. Geological Survey. Washington, 1971.
LIBRALTO, G; et al. Seawater ecotoxicity of monoethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine. Journal of Hazardous Materials. V. 176, p. 535-539. Nov, 2009.
LIU, J. L; WONG, M. H. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs): A review on environmental contamination in China. Environmental International .v. 59, p. 208-224, Jul, 2013.
LOMBARDO, A; et al. Optimizing the aquatic toxicity assessment under REACH through an integrated testing strategy (ITS). Environmental Research. V. 135, p. 156-164. Sept, 2014.
MANOVÁ, E; et al. Organic UV filters in personal care products in Switzerland: A survey of occurrence and concentrations. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental
MANOVÁ, E; et al. Organic UV filters in personal care products in Switzerland: A survey of occurrence and concentrations. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental