• Nenhum resultado encontrado

After analysing the data fetched in this research, this study derived at this theory: the warmth of a service provider influences a consumer to display prosocial behaviour more than the competence of a service provider.

7.1 Implications for theory

First of all, this research theory does not imply that the success of a company is based on their warmth. Secondly, the theory does not insinuate that if a company shows warmth but shows incompetence, the company can still trigger a consumer to act prosocially. The theory implies that a company is more likely to spur the prosocial behaviour of a consumer if they act more warmly than competently. This is obvious from the research findings as both variables are significant, with warmth being more significant.

Furthermore, even though the context of this research is situated during the COVID-19 period, the findings can still be used to measure the relationship between a service provider’s warmth

and competence and a consumer’s prosocial behaviour in other contexts. In other words, the

results can be used to analyse business interactions that trigger helping behaviour in other problematic situations, apart from the COVID-19 crisis.

In addition, we can also derive implications from this study’s literature review. Fiske, Cuddy &

Glick (2018) stipulate that warmth has a direct association with prosocial behaviour. Their

research theory also intersects with the theory of William & Bargh (2005), which posits that

providing a physical appearance of warmth promotes prosocial behaviour. However, while

Fiske et. al (2018) and William & Bargh (2005) investigate only warmth’s influence on prosocial

behaviour, this research investigates the influence of both warmth and competence on

55

prosocial behaviour. In this respect, this research is similar to the research works of Scott, Mende, & Bolton (2013) and Kervyn, Fiske & Malone (2012). Their conclusions are also similar to this research theory.

Finally, this theory has provided a model which non-profit organisations can use to drive action and influence people to donate or volunteer to organisations that aim to help people in times of crises.

7.2 Managerial implications

We can derive managerial implications of this research’s theory from the research questions.

Firstly, if any company (particularly a non-profit organisation) seeks to draw a consumer’s attention to any ongoing crises (in this case, the COVID-19 pandemic), such a company might need to display more warmth, as well as competence. The same can be said for any non-profit organisation that seeks to influence a consumer to donate towards aiding affected people in times of crises. In the same vein, if a service provider, a government for instance, wants to get people to volunteer towards helping people affected by natural disaster, that government would have to demonstrate warmth traits, in addendum with competence traits. Lastly, to get people to cooperate with enacted regulations designed to mitigate a crisis (for example, a revolution), a government might need to display more warmth than competence.

7.3 Limitations

The first limitation with this research methodology is its choice to gather data on the web.

Because we utilised Qualtrics Survey to deploy the survey questions to recipients on the

internet, there was an imbalance in the identities of respondents that answered the survey.

56

For instance, an average of fifty per cent of the respondents were from Lisbon, Portugal. Also, an average of seventy per cent of the respondents have graduated from the university or about to. This might have influenced the findings in this research as the results reached might align with Portuguese graduates only and not the world in general.

Another trade-off we had to make was to ignore the creation and designing of a survey for service providers. The survey in this research was designed only for consumers and their

response to service provider’s warmth or competence. This suggests that the findings in this

research might be slightly one-sided and biased. This research would have been more non-partisan and objective if it had collected data from both consumers and service providers that interacted during the COVID-19 period.

7.4 Future research suggestions

Recall that in the analysis, the independent variables (IVs) (the service provider’s warmth and competence) were regressed on the dependent variable (a consumer’s prosocial behaviour), and the mediating variable was the COVID-19 pandemic. Future researchers are advised to compare the same IVs and DV using a different mediating variable, which can be the post-pandemic reality. Thus, future researchers might want to discover whether the warmth or competence of a service provider can influence a consumer to help people after a crisis, like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Also, we recommend future researchers to consider other control variables and extraneous variables that have been ignored in this study. Moreover, we recommend future researchers to test this research’s theory using a different contextual crises, different from the COVID-19 pandemic. For instance, future researchers might decide to test this research’s theory adapting the 2022 Russia-Ukraine war as a context.

57

Lastly, unlike this research’s methodology, we advise future researchers to collect data from both service providers and consumers to derive at a more objective result than the one in this study.

58

BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES

Afifah, N., & Asnan, A. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility, service experience and intercultural competence on customer company identification, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty (case study: PDAM Tirta Khatulistiwa Pontianak West Kalimantan). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 277-284.

Aaker, J. L., Garbinsky, E. N., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Cultivating admiration in brands: Warmth, competence, and landing in the “golden quadrant”. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 191-194.

Bierhoff, H. W. (2002). Prosocial behavior. Psychology Press.

Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic?. Advances in experimental social psychology, 20, 65-122.

Burkart, J. M., Allon, O., Amici, F., Fichtel, C., Finkenwirth, C., Heschl, A., ... & Van Schaik, C. P. (2014).

The evolutionary origin of human hyper-cooperation. Nature communications, 5(1), 1-9.

Brady, M. K., & Cronin Jr, J. J. (2001). Customer orientation: Effects on customer service perceptions and outcome behaviors. Journal of service Research, 3(3), 241-251.

Dunn, E. W., Whillans, A. V., Norton, M. I., & Aknin, L. B. (2020). Prosocial spending and buying time:

Money as a tool for increasing subjective well-being. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 61, pp. 67-126). Academic Press.

De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Bloemer, J. (1998). On the relationship between perceived service quality, service loyalty and switching costs. International journal of service industry management.

59

EL SEDDAWY, A. I., & MOHAMED, M. H. (2021). THE INFLUENCE OF COVID-19 ON E-COMMERCE TOWARDS ONLINE SHOPPING. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 99(6).

Etkin, A., Klemenhagen, K. C., Dudman, J. T., Rogan, M. T., Hen, R., Kandel, E. R., & Hirsch, J. (2004).

Individual differences in trait anxiety predict the response of the basolateral amygdala to unconsciously processed fearful faces. Neuron, 44(6), 1043-1055.

Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge University Press.

Fiske, S. T. (2018). Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Current directions in psychological science, 27(2), 67-73.

Grandey, A. A., Fisk, G. M., Mattila, A. S., Jansen, K. J., & Sideman, L. A. (2005). Is “service with a smile”

enough? Authenticity of positive displays during service encounters. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(1), 38-55.

Güntürkün, P., Haumann, T., & Mikolon, S. (2020). Disentangling the Differential Roles of Warmth and Competence Judgments in Customer-Service Provider Relationships. Journal of Service Research, 23(4), 476-503.

Halabi, S., Dovidio, J. F., & Nadler, A. (2008). When and how do high status group members offer help:

Effects of social dominance orientation and status threat. Political Psychology, 29(6), 841-858.

60

Huang, Y., Zhang, M., Gursoy, D., & Shi, S. (2020). An examination of interactive effects of employees’

warmth and competence and service failure types on customer’s service recovery cooperation intention. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.

Infanger, M., & Sczesny, S. (2015). Communion-over-agency effects on advertising effectiveness. International Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 285-306.

Kervyn, N., Fiske, S. T., & Malone, C. (2012). Brands as intentional agents framework: How perceived intentions and ability can map brand perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 166-176.

Kirmani, A., Hamilton, R. W., Thompson, D. V., & Lantzy, S. (2017). Doing well versus doing good: The differential effect of underdog positioning on moral and competent service providers. Journal of Marketing, 81(1), 103-117.

Kolbl, Ž., Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2019). Stereotyping global brands: Is warmth more important than competence?. Journal of Business Research, 104, 614-621.

Lowe, S., & Fothergill, A. (2003). A need to help: Emergent volunteer behavior after September 11th. Beyond September 11th: An account of post-disaster research, 293-314.

Lemmink, J., & Mattsson, J. (2002). Employee behavior, feelings of warmth and customer perception in service encounters. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management.

Lovelock, C. H., & Young, R. F. (1979). Look to consumers to increase productivity. Harvard business review, 57(3), 168-178.

Documentos relacionados