• Nenhum resultado encontrado

A fita reagente de urina Multistix® 10SG testada nesse estudo como método alternativo ao convencional para diagnóstico de peritonite em pacientes submetidos a diálise peritoneal apresentou excelentes resultados de sensibilidade e especificidade, além de altos VPP e VPN. Esse método poderia ser utilizado como um simples teste à beira do leito sempre que houver suspeita de infecção e, nesses casos, um resultado positivo tem valor diagnóstico para peritonite, autorizando o início de terapia antibiótica empírica. Um resultado negativo da fita reagente de urina sugere ausência de peritonite, porém deve-se estar atento a sintomatologia discreta ainda incipiente e observação de outros fatores e dados laboratoriais.

Tomando como base os nossos resultados e os estudos mencionados anteriormente, acreditamos que a fita reagente possa ser uma opção viável para um diagnóstico mais rápido e mais barato da peritonite em pacientes submetidos a diálise peritoneal. Clínicas de terapia renal substitutiva e até mesmo hospitais universitários muitas vezes não dispõem de estrutura laboratorial acessível em tempo integral. Assim a fita reagente de urina é uma ferramenta diagnóstica promissora. Sua simplicidade e seu baixo custo têm notória aplicabilidade no serviço público de saúde.

ABCDT. Associação Brasileira dos Centros de Diálise e Transplante. ABCDT. Disponível em: <http://www.abcdt.org.br> em 13 de fev. 2009.

ABREU, P.F. DRC e saúde pública. Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia. São Paulo, v.28, n.3, s. 2, p. 6 – 7, set. 2006.

ANTONSEN, S.; PERDERSEN, FB and The Danish Study Group of Peritonitis in Dialysis (DASPID). Comparison of Cytur Test and Chemstrip LN for detecting neuthrophils in CAPD – effluents. Peritoneal Dialysis International, Downsview, v. 10, p. 310 - 311, 2000.

ANTONSEN, S.; PERDERSEN, F.B.; WANG, P. and The Danish Study Group of Peritonitis in Dialysis (DASPID). Leukocytes in peritoneal dialysis effluents. Peritoneal Dialysis International. Downsview, v. 11, p. 43 – 7, 1991.

BARRETTI, P. Indicações, escolha do método e preparo do paciente para a Terapia renal substitutiva (TRS), na Doença Renal Crônica (DRC). Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, São Paulo, v. 26, n. 3 (supl. 1), p. 47 – 49, ago. 2004.

BARRETTI, P. et al. Peritonitis in Latin America. Peritoneal Dialysis International. Downsview, v. 27, n. 3, p. 332 – 339, may 2007.

BAYER, Clinitek ® 50. Manual para o usuário. E.U.A, 1996. 29 p.

BERNARDINI, J. et al. Randomized double blinded trial of antibiotic exit site cream for the prevention of exit site infection in peritoneal dialysis patients. Journal of American Society of Nephrology. Baltimore, v. 16, n. 2, p. 539 – 545, feb. 2005.

BRENNER, B.M. Nephrology, Brenner & Rector’s The Kidney. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1996, 2653p

BRAHM, M. A simple diagnostic method of peritonitis in patients on CAPD. Scand Journal of Urology and Nephrology, Stockholm, v. 18, n. 3, p. 223 – 5, 1984.

BROWN, F. et al. A quarter of a century of adult peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis at an Australian medical center. Peritoneal Dialysis International. Downsview, v. 27, n. 5, p. 565 – 574, sep. 2007.

CASTELLOTE, J. et al. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and bacterascites prevalence in assyntomatic cirrhotic outpatients undergoing large-volume

paracentesis.Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. Melbourne, v. 23, n. 7, p. 256 – 9, feb. 2008.

CASTELLOTE, J. et al. Rapid diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis by use of reagent strips. Hepatology, Baltimore, v. 34, n. 4, p. 893 – 6, apr. 2003.

CASTELLOTE, J. et al. Use of reagent strips for the rapid diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial empyema. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. New York, v. 39, n. 4, p. 278 – 81, apr. 2005.

CLOONAN, C.C.; GATRELL, C.B.; CUSHNER, H.M. Emergencies in continuous dialysis patients. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. Oxford, v. 8, p. 134 – 148, mar. 1990.

CHADBAN, S.J. et al. Prevalence of kidney damage in Australian adults: The AusDiab Kidney Study. Journal of American Society of Nephrology, Baltimore, v. 14, n. 7, p. 131 – 138, july. 2003.

CHAN, L.K., OLIVER, D.O. Simple method for early detection of peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. The Lancet. London, v.314, n. 8156 – 7, p. 1336 – 1337, dec. 1979.

CHOW, K.M. A risk analysis of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis. Peritoneal Dialysis International. Downsview, v. 25, n. 4, p. 374 – 379, jul. 2005.

COLLINS, A.J. United States Renal Data System 2005 Annual Data Report. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. New York, v. 47, s. 1, A5 – 6, jan. 2006

CORESH, J. et al. Prevalence of high blood pressure and elevated serum creatinine level in the United States: Findings from the third National Health in the United States survey, 1988 – 1994. Archives of Internal Medicine. Chicago, v. 161, n. 9, p. 1207 – 1216, may 2001.

COOPER G.L. et al. Lack of utility of routine screening tests for early detection of peritonitis in patients requiring intermittent peritoneal dialysis. Infection Control. Thorofare, v. 5, n. 7, p. 321 – 5, jul. 1984.

CRONEN, P.W.; MOSS, J.P.; SIMPSON, T. Tenckhoff catheter placement: Surgical aspects. American Surgeon. Atlanta, v. 51, p. 627, nov. 1985.

CROPPER, E. et al. Rapid diagnosis of peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Journal of Nephrology. Milano, v. 16. P. 379 – 383, may, 2003.

DATASUS. Banco de dados do Sistema Único de Saúde. SUS. Disponível em <http://www.datasus.gov.br>. Acesso em: 13 fev. 2009.

DAVENPORT, A. Peritonitis remains the major clinical complication of peritoneal dialysis: the London, UK, Peritonitis Audit 2002 – 2003. Peritoneal Dialysis International. Downsview, v. 29, s. 3, p. 297 – 302, may, 2009.

DAVIES, S.J et al. Longitudinal changes in peritoneal kinetics: the effect of peritoneal dialysis and peritonitis. Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation, Oxford, v.11, p 498 – 506, mar. 1996.

FARMER, C.K.T. et al. Leukocyte esterase reagent strips for early detection of peritonitis in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International. Downsview, v.20, n. 2, p. 237 – 9, mar. 2000.

FONTÁN, M.P. et al. Peritonitis-related mortality in patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International. Downsview, v. 25, n. 3, p. 274 – 284, may 2005.

FORTES, P.C. Controlling inflammation in peritoneal dialysis: the role of PD- related factors as potential intervention targets. Peritoneal Dialysis International. Downsview, v. 27, s.2, p.76 – 81, jun. 2007.

FREEHALLY, J; FLOEGE J.; JOHNSON R.J. Comprehensive Clinical Nephrology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier, 2007, 1239 p.

GADALLAH, M.F. et al. Role of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing postoperative peritonitis in newly placed peritoneal dialysis catheters. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. New York, v.35, n.5, p. 1014 – 1019, nov. 2000.

HAFEZ, M.H.; ABDELLATIF, D.A.; ELKHATIB, M.M. Prevention of renal disease progression and renal replacement therapy in emerging countries. Artificial Organs, Cleveland, v. 30, p. 501 – 9, jul. 2006.

HALL, G. et al. New directions in peritoneal dialysis patient training. Nephrology Nursing Journal. Pitman, v. 31, n. 2, p. 149 – 154, 159 – 163, mar. apr. 2004.

HAMER, R.A; EL NAHAS, A.M. The burden of chronic kidney disease. British Medical Journal, London, v. 332, n. 7541, p. 563 – 4, mar. 2006.

HAN, S.H et al. Reduced residual renal function is a risk of peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. Oxford, v. 22, n. 9, p. 2653 – 2658, sep. 2007.

HELD, P.J. et al. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: comparison of patient mortality with adjustment for comorbid conditions. Kidney International, New York, v. 45, n. 4, p. 1163 – 9, apr. 1994.

HILLEGE, H.L. et al. for the PREVEND study group. Microalbuminuria is common, also in a nondiabetic, nonhypertensive population, and a independent indicator of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular morbidity. Journal of Internal Medicine, Oxford, v. 249, n. 6, p. 519 – 26, june 2001.

ISEKI, K. et al. Risk of developing end-stage renal disease in a cohort os mass screening. Kidney International. New York, v. 49, n. 3, p. 800 – 5, mar. 1996.

JACOBS, J. et al. Correlation of leukocyte esterase detection by reagent strips and the presence of neutrophils: a study in BAL fluid. Chest. Park Ridge, v 118, p. 1450 – 54, nov. 2000.

K/DOQI CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. New York, v. 39, 2002.

KEOGH, A.M. Complications in peritoneal dialysis: peritonitis and exit-site

infections. Peritoneal Dialysis International. Downsview, v. 16, p. 464 – 7, 1996.

LEDERER, E.; OUSEPH, R. Chronic Kidney Disease. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. New York, v. 49, n. 1, p. 162 – 171, jan. 2007.

LESCANO, M. Métodos alternativos para o diagnóstico precoce de peritonite bacteriana espontânea em pacientes cirróticos. 2006. 74 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Medicina) – Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, 2006.

LIMA, F.L. Uma experiência em diálise peritoneal – o programa de diálise peritoneal da CLINESE. 2006. 75 p. Monografia (Graduação em Medicina) – Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, 2006.

LIU, B.F et al. Low phagocytic activity of resident peritoneal macrophages in diabetic mice: relevance to the formation of advanced glycation end products. Diabetes. New York, v. 48, n. 10, p. 2074 – 2082, oct. 1999.

LÔBO, J.V.D. Peritonite em pacientes renais crônicos em programa de diálise peritoneal da CLINESE. 2006. 81 p. Monografia (Graduação em Medicina) – Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, 2006.

MOLITCH, M.E. et al. The diabetes prevention program and its global implications. Journal of American Society of Nephrology, Baltimore, v. 14, p. 103 – 7, jul. 2003.

MOLYNEUX, E.; WALSH, A. Caution in the use of reagent strips to diagnose acute bacterial meningitis. The Lancet. London, v 348, p 1170 – 71, oct. 1996.

MONTENEGRO, J. Diálisis peritoneal en la insuficiencia renal crónica. In: Llach F, Valderrábano F, editores. Insuficiencia renal crónica. Diálisis y trasplante renal. Madrid : Ediciones Norma; p. 999-1047, 1997.

MORRISON HURLEY, R.L. et al. Detection of leukocytes in peritoneal effluent by test strip. The Lancet. London, v 317, n. 8217, p. 437 – 8, feb. 1981.

NOBRE, S.R. et al. Value of reagent strips in the rapid diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Hepatogastroenterology, Stuttgart, v. 55, n. 84, p 1020 – 3, may – june 2008.

NWANKWO, E.; BELLO, A.K.; EL NAHAS, A.M. Chronic kidney disease:

stemming the global tide. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, New York, v. 45, n. 1, p. 201 – 8, jan. 2005.

OREOPOULOS, D.G. et al. Prevention of peritonitis in patients undergoing CAPD. Peritoneal Dialysis International, Downsview, v. 6, n.1, 1986.

PARK, S.J. et al. Using reagent strips for rapid diagnosis of peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis. Toronto, v. 21, p. 69 – 71, 2005

PASSOS, V.M.A.; BARRETO, S.M.; LIMA-COSTA, M.F.F.; BAMBUI HEALTH AND AGEING STUDY (BHAS) GROUP. Detection of renal dysfunction based on serum creatinine levels in a Brazilian community. The Bambui Health Ageing Group. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, Ribeirão Preto, v. 36, p 393 – 401, mar. 2003.

PECOITS – FILHO R. Diagnóstico de Doença Renal Crônica: Avaliação da Função Renal. Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, São Paulo, v. 26, n. 3 (supl. 1), p. 4 – 5, ago. 2004.

PIRAINO, B. Infectious complications of peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International. Downsview, v. 17, p. 15 – 8, 1997.

PIRAINO, B. et al ISPS Guidelines / Recommendations. Peritoneal dialysis-related recommendations: 2005 update. Peritoneal Dialysis International, Downsview, v. 25, p. 107 – 131, mar. 2005.

RIELLA, M. C. Princípios de Nefrologia e Distúrbios Hidroeletrolíticos. 4. ed., São Paulo: Guanabara-Koogan, 2003, 1033 p.

RO, Y. et al. Rapid, simple, and reliable method for the diagnosis of CAPD

peritonitis using the new MMP-9 test kit. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. New York, v. 18, n. 4, p. 224 – 30, 2004.

ROMÃO – JÚNIOR, J.E. Doença Renal Crônica: Definição, Etiologia e

Classificação. Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, São Paulo, v. 26, n. 3 (supl. 1), p. 1 – 3, ago. 2004.

SAM, R. et al. Utility of a peritoneal dialysis leukocyte test strip in the diagnosis of peritonitis. Artificial Organs. Cleveland, v. 26, n. 6, p. 546 – 8, june 2002.

SAPEY, T. et al. Rapid diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis with leukocyte esterase reagent strips in a European and in a American Center. Journal of

Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Melbourne, v. 20, n. 2, p. 187 – 92, feb. 2005.

SAXENA, R; WEST, C. Peritoneal dialysis: a primary care perspective. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. Palo Alto, v. 19, p. 380 – 9, jul. 2006.

SBN. CENSO SBN – Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia 2008 – Disponível em <http://www.sbn.org.br>. Acesso em 15 janeiro de 2009.

SWARTZ, R.D. Chronic peritoneal dialysis: Mechanical anda infectious complications. Nephron. Los Angeles, v. 40, 29 – 37, 1985.

SZETO, C.; KWAN B.C.; CHOW, K. Peritonitis risk for older patients on peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International. Downsview, v. 28, n. 5, p. 457 – 460, set. 2008.

TEITELBAUM, I.; BURKART, J. Peritoneal dialysis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. New York, v. 42, n. 5, p. 1082 – 96, nov. 2003.

TOPLEY, N. Membrane longevity in peritoneal dialysis: impact of infection and bio- incompatible solutions. Advances in Renal Replacement Therapy, Philadelphia, v. 5, n. 3, p. 179 – 84, jul. 1998.

THAMER, M. et al. US nephrologists' recommendation of dialysis modality: results of a national survey. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. New York, v. 37, p. 1330 – 1, dec. 2001

THEVENOT, T. et al. Diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients by use of two reagent strips. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, London, v. 16, n. 6, p. 579 – 83, june 2004.

TWARDOWSKI, Z.J. Peritoneal catheter exit-site and tunnel infections. In: Nissenson AR, Fine RN, editors. Dialysis therapy. 2a ed. Philadelphia : Hanley & Belfus; p. 165-8, 1993.

TWARDOWSKI, Z.J. History of peritoneal access development. International Journal of Artificial Organs. Milano, v. 29, p. 2-40, jan. 2006.

USRDS – UNITED STATES RENAL DATA SYSTEM, Annual data report. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. New York, v. 37, s. 1 – 189, 2002.

VARGEMEZIS, V.; THODIS, E. Prevention and management of peritonitis and exit-site infection in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation. Oxford, v. 16, p. 106 – 8, 2001.

VAS, S. Changing picture of peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. New York, v.36, n. 5, p. 1057 – 8, nov. 2000.

VICENTE, A.M.G. et al. Scintigraphic diagnosis of infectious complications in renal failure patients undergoing hemodialysis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis or renal transplant. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. Curitiba, v. 48, p. 97-108, 2005.

VONESH, E.F. et al. Mortality in end-stage renal disease: a reassessment of differences between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Journal of American Society of Nephrology. Baltimore, v. 10, n. 2, p. 354 – 65, feb. 1999.

WANG, Q. et al. Albumin at the start of peritoneal dialysis predicts the development of peritonitis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. New York, v. 41, n.3. p. 664 – 669, mar. 2003.

FICHA DE COLETA DE DADOS

Nome:

Idade: _________ anos Sexo: □ M □ F Data de Nasc: ___/___/___ Etiologia da DRC:

Modalidade de TRS atual: □ DPAC □ DPA □ DPI Tempo de TRS:

Tempo em DP:

Já realizou outra modalidade □ Sim □ Não Qual?

Comorbidades: □ HAS □ DM □ Cardiopatia □ Outras: _____________________ COLETAS DE LÍQUIDO PERITONEAL: 1a Coleta: Data: Liquido turvo □ Dor abdominal □ Fita Observador 1 Observador 2 Citometria Gram Cultura: 1a Coleta: Data: Liquido turvo □ Dor abdominal □ Fita Observador 1 Observador 2 Citometria Gram Cultura: 1a Coleta: Data: Liquido turvo □ Dor abdominal □ Fita Observador 1 Observador 2 Citometria Gram Cultura:

COLETAS DE LÍQUIDO PERITONEAL EM SUSPEITA DE PERITONITE: 1a Coleta: Data: Liquido turvo □ Dor abdominal □ Fita Observador 1 Observador 2 Citometria Gram Cultura: 1a Coleta: Data: Liquido turvo □ Dor abdominal □ Fita Observador 1 Observador 2 Citometria Gram Cultura: 1a Coleta: Data: Liquido turvo □ Dor abdominal □ Fita Observador 1 Observador 2 Citometria Gram Cultura:

Documentos relacionados