• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Diagnóstico SWOT Pontos fortes

Os programas regionais estão bem definidos desde 1991 e constituem a ponta da lança da avaliação das aprendizagens. Foram observados progressos reais na implementação das estruturas de avaliação. As avaliações nacionais dos conhecimentos tendem a multiplicar-se. Pontos fracos

Subsiste uma discrepância entre os métodos utilizados nas avaliações nacionais e as normas internacionais. Alguns países não têm um sistema nem avaliações nacionais.

Oportunidades

Os intercâmbios Sul-Sul constituem um meio para melhorar a reflexão no âmbito das questões técnicas e institucionais. A avaliação dos conhecimentos é um pilar da ajuda ao desenvolvimento e aos financiamentos internacionais. Quase todos os países integraram uma vertente de conhecimentos escolares nos respetivos planos setoriais. Riscos

O financiamento assenta em parte em fontes externas e não é regular. Pode existir um efeito de substituição dos programas internacionais em detrimento das avaliações nacionais. Existe um risco de bloqueio político dos resultados.

RECOMENDAÇÕES

1. Favorecer a divulgação de documentos técnicos e científicos relativos à avaliação dos conhecimentos em língua francesa 2. Favorecer a reflexão Sul-Sul sobre o posicionamento institucional

das estruturas de avaliação (partilha de organogramas, missões e estatutos)

3. Organizar formações quanto à teoria de resposta aos aspetos a abordar, à criação de testes comparáveis no tempo e à criação de escalas de competências

4. Melhorar a informação sobre o financiamento das avaliações (origens e estrutura dos custos)

5. Favorecer a publicação online dos relatórios de avaliação 6. Efetuar avaliações regulares da qualidade (a cada 3 anos),

nomeadamente durante a implementação de reformas curriculares

7. Adotar os docentes como alvo no âmbito da divulgação dos resultados

Abadzi Helen (2006), Efficient learning for the poor: insights from the frontier of cognitive neuroscience (English). Washington, DC: World Bank.

ACER (2017), System-Wide Analysis of Assessment Practices (SWAAP), Concept note, GAML.

AERA (2014), Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Allen Reg, Elks Phil, Outhred Rachel and Varly Pierre (2016), Uganda’s assessment system: a road map for enhancing assessment in education, 14 September 2016, Heart/DFID.

Bashir Sajitha, Lockheed Marlaine, Ninan Elizabeth, Tan Jee-Peng (2019), L’école au service de l’apprentissage en Afrique, Banque Mondiale et AFD.

Anderson Kate, Muskin Joshua (2018), Learning Champions, How 15 countries, cities, and provinces came together to rethink learning assessment, February 2018, Center for Universal Education at Brookings.

Best M, Knight P, Lietz P, Lockwood C, Nugroho D, Tobin M (2013), The impact of national and international assessment programmes on education policy, particularly policies regarding resource allocation and teaching and learning practices in developing countries. Final report. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. Charton Hélène (2017), Mesurer et comparer les compétences des élèves : les leçons de la réforme du PASEC, Hors-série n° 5, 2017 : L’école en mouvements, p. 153-171.

CIEP (2006), Les évaluations en éducation au niveau international : impacts, contradictions, incertitudes, Réflexions et données extraites du séminaire international « L’évaluation au service de la qualité en éducation : pratiques et enjeux ». 29 mai - 2 juin 2006, CIEP.

Clarke Marguerite (2012), What Matters Most for Student Assessment Systems: A Framework Paper, SABER, World Bank.

CONFEMEN (2015), Un système national d’évaluation pour l’Éducation au Mali, Novembre (2015).

DFID (2011), Guidance Note: A DFID practice paper, National and international assessments of student achievement.

Elks Phil (2016), The impact of assessment results on education policy and practice in East Africa

DFID think piece, January 2016, Ark/DFID.

Forum Consultatif International sur l’Education pour Tous (2000), L’évaluation des acquis scolaires, Situation et tendances 2000, UNESCO.

Ghana Education Service, NEAU (2016), Ghana 2016 National Education Assessment, Report of Findings, RTI International for USAID.

Gove Amber, Dubeck Margaret M. (2015), “The early grade reading assessment (EGRA): Its theoretical foundation, purpose, and limitations”, International Journal of Educational Development, Volume 40, January 2015, Pages 315-322.

Greaney V. & Kellaghan, T. (2008), Assessing National Achievement Levels in Education, National Assessments of Educational Achievement, World Bank.

Greaney V. & Kellaghan, T. (2012), Implementing a National Assessment of Educational Achievement, National Assessments of Educational Achievement, World Bank, Perspectives.

Greaney V. & Kellaghan, T., (2012), Using the Results of a National Assessment of Educational Achievement, National Assessments of Educational Achievement, World Bank, Perspectives.

Hanushek E. A. (2015), The Knowledge Capital of Nations: Education and the Economics of Growth, MIT Press.

Ministère de l’éducation des Seychelles (2013), The National Assessment Framework p.7-9

PME (2019), Rapport sur les résultats 2019

PME (2012), Rapport sur les résultats 2012 : Pour un dialogue concret sur le suivi de l’accès à une éducation de qualité. (Novembre). Washington, D.C.: GPE.

Reddy Vijay (2010), “Cross-national achievement studies: learning from South Africa’s participation in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), Compare”: A journal of Comparative and International Education, Vol. 35, 2005.

Sandefur J. (2016), The Case for Global Standardized Testing.

Sayed Yusuf, Kanjee Anil (2013), “Assessment in Sub- Saharan Africa: challenges and prospects”, Assessment in education, Principles, Policy and practice, Vol. 20, N°. 4. UE (2014), Learning Assessments, DEVCO B4 Education discussion paper December 2014.

UIS (2018), Data to nurture learning : SDG4 data digest 2018, UNESCO.

UNESCO (2019), La promesse de l’évaluation à grande échelle des apprentissages: reconnaître les limites pour libérer les potentialités.

UNESCO BREDA (2017), National Learning

Assessment Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: Knowledge Sharing and Needs Assessment Regional Workshop, Final report, Dakar, Senegal, 6-8 December 2017, Réseau TALENT.

WEBOGRAFIA

UNESCO/GMR (2014), Rapport de suivi de l’EPT. UNESCO/GMR (2008), Rapport de suivi de l’EPT. Wagner D.A. (2011), Smaller, Quicker, Cheaper: Improving Learning Assessments for Developing Countries, Paris: UNESCO-IIEP.

World Bank (2018), World Development Report 2018 : Learning to Realize Education’s Promise.

World Bank (2018b), IDA, project appraisal document, Cameroon, Report No: PAD2366.

World Bank (2012), Uganda student assessment saber country report, SABER.

Páginas dos programas internacionais PASEC: http://www.pasec.confemen.org/

SACMEQ: http://www.sacmeq.org/

PISA: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/pisa-en-francais.htm

PIRLS e TIMSS: http://www.pirls.org/

UWEZO: https://www.uwezo.net/

Uma topografia da UNICEF sobre os conhecimentos

https://www.unicef.org/french/education/index_achievement.html

A abordagem do GPE dos sistemas nacionais de avaliação dos conhecimentos

https://www.globalpartnership.org/fr/blog/essai-pilote-dune- nouvelle-approche-de-levaluation-des-acquis-scolaires

A página do IIPE Learning portal

https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org

As promessas de avaliação segundo o NORRAG

https://www.norrag.org/the-promise-of-large-scale-learning- assessments-acknowledging-limits-to-unlock-opportunities-by- sobhi-tawil-and-maya-prince/

PERGUNTAS DE INVESTIGAÇÃO EXTRAÍDAS DOS TERMOS DE REFERÊN-

Documentos relacionados