Figura 1 - Imagem de seio maxilar sem alteração na TCFC pré-operatória (A). Sete meses após a inserção do enxerto ósseo (B) observa-se imagem de espessamento da membrana sinusal (tipo polipóide).
Figura 2 – Mensuração da espessura da membrana sinusal no soalho de seio maxilar, em corte coronal da TCFC.
Figura 3 – Imagem de óstio permeável (A) e não permeável (B), em corte coronal da TCFC.
6. Referências
1. Alkan A, Celebi N, Bas B. Acute maxillary sinusites associated with internal sinus lifting: report of a case. Eur J Dent. 2008;2(1):69-72.
2. Anduze-Acher G, Brochery B, Felizardo R, Valentini P, Katsahian S, Bouchard P. Change in sinus membrane dimension following sinus floor elevation: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(10):1123-9.
3. Avila-Ortiz G, Neiva R, Galindo-Moreno P, Rudek I, Benevides E, Wang HL. Analysis of the influence of residual alveolar bone height on sinus augmentation outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(9):1082-8.
4. Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH, Resnik R, Reardon GT, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentristry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent. 2012;21(2):78-86.
5. Beretta M, Poli PP, Grossi GB, Pieroni S, Maiorana C. Long-term survival rate of implants placed in conjunction with 246 sinus floor elevation procedures: results of a 15- year retrospective study. J Dent. 2015;43(1):78-86.
6. Brullmann DD, Schmidtmann I, Hornstein S, Schulze RK. Correlation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) findings in the maxillary sinus with dental diagnoses: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(4):1023-9
7. Cabezas-Mojón J, Barona-Dorado C, Gómes-Moreno G, Fernández-Cáliz F, Martinez- González JM. Meta-analytica study of implant survival following sinus augmentation. Med Oral Patol Cir Bucal, 2012;17(1):e135-9.
8. Carmeli G, Artzi Z, Kozlovsky A, Segev Y, Landsberg R. Antral computadorized tomography pre-operative evaluation: relationship between mucosal thickening and maxillary sinus function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(1):78-82.
9. Chan HL, Wang HL. Sinus pathology and anatomy in relation to complications in lateral window sinus augmentation. Implant Dent. 2011;20(6):406-12.
10. Chiapasco M, Felisati G, Zaniboni M, Pipolo C, Borloni R, Lozza P. The treatment of sinusites following maxillary sinus grafting with the association of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and intra-oral approach. Clin Oral Implamts Res. 2013;24(6):623-9. 11. Cote MT, Segelnick SL, Rastogi, Schoor R. New York state ear, nose, and throat specialists’ views on pre-sinus lift referral. J Periodontol. 2011;82(2):227-33.
12. Del Fabbro M, Corbella S, Weinstein T, Ceresoli V, Taschieri S. Implant survival rates after osteotome-mediated maxillary sinus augmentation: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14 Suppl 1:e159-68.
13. Falco A, Amoroso C, Berardini M, D’Archivio L. A retrospective study of clinical and radiologic outcomes of 69 consecutive maxillary sinus augmentations associated whit functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30(3):633-8. 14. Janner SF, Caversaccio MD, Dubach P, Sendi P, Buser D, Bornstein MM. Characteristic and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane: a radiographic analysis using cone beam computed tomography in patients referred for dental implant surgery in the posterior maxila. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(12):1446-53.
15. Kara MI, Kirmali O, Ay S. Clinical evaluation of lateral and osteotome techniques for sinus floor elevation in the presence of an antral pseudocyst. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(5):1205-10.
16. Lana JP, Carneiro PM, Machado VC, de Souza PE, Manzi FR, Horta MC. Anatomic variations and lesions of the maxillary sinus detected in cone beam computed tomography for dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(12):1398–403.
17. Lee JW, Yoo JY, Paek SJ, Park WJ, Choi EJ, Choi MG, et al. Correlations between anatomic variations of maxillary sinus ostium and postoperative complication after sinus lifting. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;42(5):278-83
18. Lin YH, Yang YC, Wen SC, Wang HL. The influence of sinus membrane thickness upon membrane perforation during lateral window sinus augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(5):612-7.
19. Manor Y, Mardinger O, Bietlitum I, Nashef A, Nissan J, Chaushu G. Late signs and symptoms of maxillary sinusites after sinus augmentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110(1):e1-4.
20. Maska B, Lin GH, Othman A, Behdin S, Travan S, Benevides E, et al. Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening. Int J Implant Dent. 2017;3(1):1.
21. Pazera P, Bornstein MM, Pazera A, Sendi P, Katsaros C. Incidental maxillary sinus findings in orthodontic patients: a radiographic analysis using cone-beam computed tomography. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14(1):17-24.
22. Pommer B, Dvorak G, Jesch P, Palmer RM, Watzek G, Gahleitner A. Effect of maxillary sinus floor augmentation on sinus membrane thickness in computed tomography. J Periodontol. 2012;83(5):551-6.
23. Rak KM, Newell JD 2nd, Yakes WF, Damiano MA, Luethke JM. Paranasal sinuses on MR images of the brain: significance of mucosal thickening. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(2):381-4.
24. Rege IC, Sousa TO, Leles CR, Mendonça EF. Occurrence of maxillary sinus abnormalities detected by cone beam CT in asymptomatic patients. BCM Oral Health. 2012;10;12:30.
25. Shanbhag S, Karnik P, Shirke P, Shanbhag V. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of sinus membrane thickness ostium patency, and residual ridgeheights in the posterior maxila: implications for sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014, 25(6):755-60.
26. Tang ZH, Wu MJ, Xu WH. Implants placed simultaneously with maxillary sinus floor augmentations in the presence of antral pseudocysts: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(9):998-1001.
27. Timmenga NM, Raghoebar GM, Liem RS, van Weissenbruch R, Manson WL, Vissink A. Effects of maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery on maxillary sinus physiology. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111(3):189-97.
28. Torretta S, Mantovani M, Testori T, Cappadona M, Pignataro L. Importance of ENT assessment in strafifying candidates for sinus floor elevation: a prospoective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(100):57-62.
29. Wen SC, Lin YH, Yang YC, Wang HL. The influence of sinus membrane thickness upon membrane perforation during transcrestal sinus lift procedure. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(10):1158-64.
30. Zijderveld SA, van den Bergh JP, Schulten EA, ten Bruggenkate CM. Anatomical and surgical findings and complications in 100 consecutive maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(7):1426-38.
7. Apêndices
7.1 Artigo científico 2
Artigo elaborado segundo as normas da revista Clinical Oral Implants Research