Esta pesquisa foi realizada a partir de uma metodologia quantitativa, seguindo os preceitos da lógica objetivista. Um olhar qualitativo para a colaboração no trabalho em equipe poderá trazer novos desafios para o entendimento desse fenômeno, usando por exemplo, fundamentos subjetivistas. Estudos de casos também deverão contribuir para a identificação de novas variáveis que impactem a Qualidade do trabalho em equipe, ou ainda que moderem ou mediem sua relação com o Sucesso em PS.
Conforme observado na revisão da literatura, o processo de desenvolvimento de um software envolve a realização de uma série de etapas, cada uma composta de atividades diferentes que visam objetivos diferentes, e algumas vezes realizadas por atores diferentes. O estudo do trabalho da equipe do projeto de desenvolvimento de software decomposto nessas diferentes atividades, objetivos e atores, também poderá trazer uma compreensão mais ampla do papel da colaboração nos PS em toda a extensão dos PS.
Um outro fator limitante desta pesquisa foi o construto do sucesso em projetos, que foi estudado apenas nas dimensões de curto prazo. Estudos longitudinais, ou ainda considerando uma janela de tempo mais longa desde a finalização do projeto até a mensuração também contribuirão de maneira valorosa para relacionar o trabalho da equipe do projeto com o Sucesso em PS.
REFERÊNCIAS
Agarwal, N., & Rathod, U. (2006). Defining “success” for software projects: An exploratory revelation. International Journal of Project Management, 24(4), 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.009
Ahimbisibwe, A., Cavana, R. Y., & Daellenbach, U. (2015). A contingency fit model of critical success factors for software development projects: A comparison of agile and traditional plan-based methodologies. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2013-0060
Albertin, A. L. (2001). Valor estratégico dos projetos de tecnologia de informação. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 41(3), 42–50.
Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of project complexity - a review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201–204.
Baccarini, D. (1999). The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25–32.
Bilbao-Osorio, B., Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Insead, & World Economic Forum. (2013). The global information technology report 2013 growth and jobs in a hyperconnected world. Geneva,
Switzerland: World Economic Forum. Recuperado de
http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GITR_Report_2013.pdf
British Computer Society, & Royal Academy of Engineering (Great Britain). (2004). The challenges of complex IT projects. London: Royal Academy of Engineering.
Chiocchio, F., & Essiembre, H. (2009). Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review of Disparities Between Project Teams, Production Teams, and Service Teams. Small Group Research, 40(4), 382–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409335103
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of management, 23(3), 239–290.
Corrar, L. J., Paulo, E., & Dias Filho, J. M. (2014). Análise multivariada: para os cursos de administração, ciências contábeis e economia (5o ed). São Paulo: Editora Atlas.
Crawford, E. R., & LePine, J. A. (2013). A Configural Theory of Team Processes: Accounting for the Structure of Taskwork and Teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0206
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto (3o ed). Porto Alegre: Artmed Editora.
De Bakker, K., Boonstra, A., & Wortmann, H. (2012). Risk managements’ communicative effects influencing IT project success. International Journal of Project Management, 30(4), 444– 457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.09.003
De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191–1201. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.6.1191
De Wit, A. (1988). Measurement of project success. International journal of project management, 6(3), 164–170.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
Ebert, C., & De Neve, P. (2001). Surviving global software development. Software, IEEE, 18(2), 62–69.
Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams. Management Science, 46(12), 1554–1568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072
Gerhardt, T. E., & Silveira, D. T. (2009). Métodos de Pesquisa (1o ed). Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS.
Hackman, J. R. (1983). A normative model of work team effectiveness. DTIC Document.
Recuperado de
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA136398 Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares
structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2o ed). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne: Sage Publications.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-
6679190202
Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2005). Análise Multivariada de Dados (5o ed). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Han, W.-M. (2014). Validating differential relationships between risk categories and project performance as perceived by managers. Empirical Software Engineering, 19(6), 1956– 1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-013-9270-z
Han, W.-M., & Huang, S.-J. (2007). An empirical analysis of risk components and performance on software projects. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.04.030
He, J., Butler, B., & King, W. (2007). Team Cognition: Development and Evolution in Software Project Teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240210
Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization science, 12(4), 435– 449.
Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K. P., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2003). When teamwork really matters: task innovativeness as a moderator of the teamwork–performance relationship in software
development projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(4), 281– 302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.08.001
Hoegl, M., & Parboteeah, P. (2006). Autonomy and teamwork in innovative projects. Human Resource Management, 45(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20092
Hoegl, M., & Proserpio, L. (2004). Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects. Research Policy, 33(8), 1153–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.06.005
Hsu, J. S. C., Shih, S.-P., Chiang, J. C., & Liu, J. Y. C. (2012). The impact of transactive memory systems on IS development teams’ coordination, communication, and performance. International Journal of Project Management, 30(3), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.08.003
Iivari, J., Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (2004). Towards a distinctive body of knowledge for Information Systems experts: coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals. Information systems journal, 14(4), 313–342.
Ika, L. A. (2009). Project success as a topic in project management journals. Project Management Journal, 40(4), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20137
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 517– 543. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
International Project Management Association. (2006). ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline Version 3.0. Nijkerk: International Project Management Association.
Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., & Pick, R. A. (2003). The impact of IS department organizational environments upon project team performances. Information & Management, 40(3), 213– 220.
Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management. A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling (10o ed). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kim, Y.-M. (2009). Validation of psychometric research instruments: The case of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1178–1191. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21066
Komchaliaw, S., & Wongthongtham, P. (2010). A state of the art review on software project performance management. In 4th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems
and Technologies (p. 653–655). IEEE. Recuperado de
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5610581
Liang, T., Liu, C., Lin, T., & Lin, B. (2007). Effect of team diversity on software project performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(5), 636–653. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710750408
Lientz, B. P., & Larssen, L. (2006). Risk Management for IT Projects: How to Deal with Over 150 Issues and Risks. Newton, MA, USA: Butterworth–Heinemann.
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes. The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356. https://doi.org/10.2307/259182
Martins, G. de A. (2006). Sobre Confiabilidade e Validade. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios - RGBN, 8(20), 1–12.
Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061
McFarlan, F. W. (1981). Portfolio Approach to Information Systems. Harvard Business Review. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups, interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs/N.J: Prentice-
McLeod, L., Doolin, B., & MacDonell, S. G. (2012). A Perspective-Based Understanding of Project Success. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21290
Moraes, R. de O., & Laurindo, F. J. B. (2013). Performance evaluation of IT projects - the Shenhar and Dvir model. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8, 15–24. Müller, R., & Jugdev, K. (2012). Critical success factors in projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott –
the elucidation of project success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 757–775. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371211269040
Nidumolu, S. (1995). The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: Residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Information Systems Research, 6(3), 191–219. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.3.191
Project Management Institute. (2013). Um Guia do Conhecimento em Gerenciamento de Projetos (5o ed). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, Inc.
Ringle, C. M., Silva, D. D., & Bido, D. D. S. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling with the Smartpls. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(2), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2717
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH, http://www. smartpls. com.
Sancho-Thomas, P., Fuentes-Fernández, R., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2009). Learning teamwork skills in university programming courses. Computers & Education, 53(2), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.010
Sawyer, S. (2004). Software Development Teams: Considering three software development team archetypes and their implications. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 95–99.
Sawyer, S., & Guinan, P. J. (1998). Software development: Processes and performance. IBM Systems Journal, 37(4).
Sawyer, S., Guinan, P. J., & Cooprider, J. (2010). Social interactions of information systems development teams: a performance perspective. Information Systems Journal, 20(1), 81– 107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00311.x
Sharma, A., & Gupta, A. (2012). Impact of organisational climate and demographics on project specific risks in context to Indian software industry. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.003
Shenhar, A. J. (2004). Strategic Project Leadership® Toward a strategic approach to project management. R&D Management, 34(5), 569–578.
Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2009). Reinventando Gerenciamento de Projetos (1o ed). São Paulo: M. Books do Brasil Editora LTDA.
Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., & Maltz, A. C. (2001). Project success: a multidimensional strategic concept. Long range planning, 34(6), 699–725.
Shenhar, A. J., Levy, O., & Dvir, D. (1997). Mapping The Dimensions of Project Success. Project Management Journal, 28(2), 5–13.
Snow, A. P., Keil, M., & Wallace, L. (2007). The effects of optimistic and pessimistic biasing on software project status reporting. Information and Management, 44(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.009
Söderlund, J. (2005). Developing project competence: empirical regularities in competitive project operations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4), 451–480.
Söderlund, J., & Maylor, H. (2012). Project management scholarship: Relevance, impact and five integrative challenges for business and management schools. International Journal of Project Management, 30(6), 686–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.03.007
Staats, B. R. (2012). Unpacking Team Familiarity: The Effects of Geographic Location and Hierarchical Role: Unpacking Team Familiarity. Production and Operations Management, 21(3), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01254.x
Sudhakar, G. P. (2012). A model of critical success factors for software projects. Journal of
Enterprise Information Management, 25(6), 537–558.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17410391211272829
Sudhakar, G. P., Farooq, A., & Patnaik, S. (2011). Soft factors affecting the performance of software development teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 17(3/4), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591111143718
Sundstrom, E., McIntyre, M., Halfhill, T., & Richards, H. (2000). Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2699 4.1.44
Thamhain, H. J. (2004). Linkages of project environment to performance: lessons for team leadership. International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.005
Thamhain, H. J. (2009). Leadership lessons from managing technology-intensive teams. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 6(2), 117–133.
Thamhain, H. J. (2011). Critical Success Factors for Managing Technology-Intensive Teams in the Global Enterprise. Engineering Management Journal, 23(3), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2011.11431906
Tjosvold, D. (1986). The Dynamics of Interdependence in Organizations. Human Relations, 39(6), 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678603900603
Wallace, L., Keil, M., & Rai, A. (2004a). How software project risk affects project performance: An investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 289–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02059.x
Wallace, L., Keil, M., & Rai, A. (2004b). Understanding software project risk: A cluster analysis. Information and Management, 42(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.12.007
Wateridge, J. (1998). How can IS/IT projects be measured for success? International Journal of Project Management, 16(1), 59–63.
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Oppen, C. van. (2009). Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177–195.
APÊNDICE A – INSTRUMENTO PARA COLETA DE DADOS
O instrumento de coleta de dados foi organizado em três partes: a Parte 1 visou a coleta de dados descritivos acerca do respondente, da equipe do projeto, do projeto e da organização. A Parte 2 e a Parte 3, respectivamente, coletaram os dados que mensuraram a Qualidade do trabalho em equipe e o Sucesso em PS. Antes, porém, de responder o questionário, o respondente foi indagado sobre a duração do projeto e o tempo passado desde a conclusão do mesmo, como condicionantes para que o questionário pudesse ser respondido: