Limitações e trabalho futuro

Face à atual situação de pandemia mundial, alguns dos planos originais no desenvolvimento da investigação tiveram de ser substituídos ou adaptados para um método de trabalho remoto. A divulgação da plataforma e o consequente aumento na participação no mCiências foi o aspeto mais afetado no desenvolvimento deste trabalho. A organização de um workshop pode ainda ser considerada no futuro, preferencialmente num contexto mais seguro. Através deste método é possível levar a divulgação da plataforma mCiências a um público mais alargado e proceder à aplicação dos processos de revisão e validação.

Apesar de um número de professores relativamente pequeno, os professores que participaram neste estudo referiram variadas formas e métodos no que diz respeito à integração do multimédia no ensino. Num futuro estudo, é importante estudar a prevalência destas práticas dentro de um conjunto de professores.

Para além da divulgação, a plataforma mCiências como espaço de afinidade, carece ainda de maturar o seu processo de construção. Além disso, verificou-se que poderá ainda não haver entendimento entre as duas componentes de partilha na plataforma, e por isso, a comunicação do mCiências precisa também de ser trabalhada.

Esperamos que os resultados deste trabalho possam ser levados em consideração na construção de um espaço de afinidade, e fomentar o futuro desenvolvimento do mCiências como espaço de afinidade.

88

Referências

Araújo, I., & Cabrita, I. (2015). Motivation for Learning Mathematics in Higher Education Through the "M@t-Educate With Success" Platform. EDULEARN15 Proceedings, 5704-5713. Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de Conteúdo. Lisboa, PT

Bennett, S., Maton, K., Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786.

Bower, M., Hedberg, J. G., & Kuswara, A. (2010). A framework for Web 2.0 learning design.

Educational Media International, 47(3), 177-198. doi:10.1080/09523987.2010.518811

Chasin, F., Gal, U., & Riemer, K. (2013). The Genealogy of Knowledge Introducing a Tool and Method for Tracing the Social Construction of Knowledge on Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Conference on Information Systems.

Colepicolo, E. (2015). Information reliability for academic research: review and recommendations.

New Library World, 116(11-12), 646-660. doi:10.1108/nlw-05-2015-0040

Direção Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência (2007). Resolução do Conselho de Ministros n.º 137/2007, 1.ª série, n.º 180, 18 de setembro de 2007. Retirado em 18 de junho de 2020, de https://dre.pt/pesquisa/-/search/628869/details/maximized

Diário da República (2018). Decreto-Lei n.º 55/2018, 1.ª série, n.º 129, 6 de julho de 2018. Retirado em 18 de junho de 2020, de https://dre.pt/pesquisa/-

/search/115652951/details/maximized Dodge, B. (1995). Some Thoughts About WebQuests.

http://webquest.org/sdsu/about_webquests.html

Donnelly, D., McGarr, O., & O'Reilly, J. (2011). A framework for teachers' integration of ICT into their classroom practice. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1469-1483.

doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.014

Fakomogbon, M., & Bolaji, H. (2017). Effects of Collaborative Learning Styles on Performance of Students in a Ubiquitous Collaborative Mobile Learning Environment. 8(3), 268-279. Faria, P. M., Araújo, I., & Vilaça, P. (2018). A technological solution for a collaborative mobile

89

Fields, D.A., Pantic, K., Kafai, Y.B. (2015). "I have a tutorial for this": The language of online peer support in the Scratch programming community. Proceedings of IDC 2015: The 14th

International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 229-238.

Gañán, D., Caballé, S., Conesa, J., Barolli, L., Kulla, E., & Spaho, E. (2014). A systematic review of

multimedia resources to support teaching and learning in virtual environments.

Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. (2012). Nurturing Affinity Spaces and Game-Based Learning. In C. Steinkuehler, K. Squire, & S. Barab (Eds.), Games, Learning, and Society: Learning

and Meaning in the Digital Age (pp. 129-153). Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139031127.015

Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009, May). Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age Web 2.0 and Classroom Research: What Path Should We Take Now? [Article]. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259.

https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x09336671

Groff, J. (2013). Technology-rich innovative learning environments.

Hernández, N., Gonzalez-Sanmamed, M., & Muñoz Carril, P. (2014). Planning Collaborative Learning in Virtual Environments. Comunicar, 21, 25-33. doi:10.3916/C42-2014-02 Hernández-Sellés, N., Munoz-Carril, P. C., & Gonzalez-Sanmamed, M. (2019). Computer-

supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools. Computers & Education, 138, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.012

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Liu, L., Gray, S., & Jordan, R. (2015). Using representational tools to learn about complex systems: A tale of two classrooms. Journal of Research in Science

Teaching, 52(1), 6-35. doi:10.1002/tea.21187

Hod, Y., Sagy, O., & Kali, Y. (2018). The opportunities of networks of research-practice partnerships and why CSCL should not give up on large-scale educational change.

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(4), 457-466.

doi:10.1007/s11412-018-9287-9

Hoosen, S. (2012). Survey on governments' open educational resources (OER) Policies. Vancouver/Paris: Commonwealth of Learning/UNESCO.

Huang, J., Shi, S., Chen, Y., & Chow, W. (2015). How do students trust Wikipedia? An examination across genders. Information Technology & People, 29, 750-773. doi:10.1108/ITP-12-2014-0267

90

Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help?

Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265.

Kelton, K., Fleischmann, K. R., & Wallace, W. A. (2008). Trust in digital information. Journal of

the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(3), 363-374.

doi:10.1002/asi.20722

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?

Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.

Kwon, K., Liu, Y. H., & Johnson, L. P. (2014). Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good vs. poor collaborators. Computers & Education, 78, 185-200.

doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.004

Legard, R., Keegan, J. & Ward, K. (2003). In-depth interviews. In: Richie, J. and Lewis, J., Eds., Qualitative Research Practice, Sage, London, 139-168.

Magnifico, A. M., Lammers, J. C., & Fields, D. A. (2018). Affinity spaces, literacies and

classrooms: tensions and opportunities. Literacy, 52(3), 145-152. doi:10.1111/lit.12133 Mai, J. E. (2013). The quality and qualities of information. Journal of the American Society for

Information Science and Technology, 64(4), 675-688. doi:10.1002/asi.22783

Martin-Villalba, C., Urquia, A., & Dormido, S. (2012). Development of virtual-labs for education in chemical process control using Modelica. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 39, 170-178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.10.010 Mazzardo, M. D., Nobre, A., & Mallmann, E. M. (2017). Recursos Educacionais Abertos: acesso

gratuito ao conhecimento? EaD em FOCO, 7(1), 27-36. doi:10.18264/eadf.v7i1.446 McKenna, K. (2016). A Deconstruction of the Distance Learning Milieu: Affinity Spaces in Higher

Education. (doctoral dissertation). University of Northen Colorado, Greeley, Colorado.

Mota, J. (2017). Multimedia in Science Teaching: from a repository to an Education community. (master's thesis). Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal Mota, J., Morais, C., & Moreira, L. (2018). Multimedia in Science Teaching: Bridging Scholars and

Science Educators. Edulearn18 Proceedings, 5528-5537

Mota, J., Morais, C., Moreira, L., & Paiva, J. C. (2017). mSciences: An Affinity Space for Science Teachers. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(3), 401-413.

91

Napal, M., Mendioroz-Lacambra, A. M., & Penalva, A. (2020). Sustainability Teaching Tools in the Digital Age. Sustainability, 12(8), 14. doi:10.3390/su12083366

Paiva, J. C., Morais, C., & Moreira, L. (2015). Multimédia no ensino das ciências: cinco anos de

investigação e ensino em Portugal. Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.

Paiva, J. C., Morais, C., & Moreira, L. (2016). MULTIMEDIA IN SCIENCE TEACHING: PEDAGOGY DESIGNS AND RESEARCH OPTIONS IN THE PORTUGUESE EDUCATION BETWEEN 2010-2014. Edulearn16: 8th International Conference on

Education and New Learning Technologies, 7690-7698

Patton, K., & Parker, M. (2017). Teacher education communities of practice: More than a culture of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 351-360.

doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.013

Popov, V., Biemans, H. J. A., Fortuin, K. P. J., van Vliet, A. J. H., Erkens, G., Mulder, M., Jaspers, J., Li, Y. (2019). Effects of an interculturally enriched collaboration script on student attitudes, behavior, and learning performance in a CSCL environment. Learning,

Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 100-123. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.004

Pordata (2019). Computadores no ensino básico e secundário: total e por nível de ensino –

Continente. Retirado de

https://www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Computadores+no+ensino+b%C3%A1sico+e+secund %C3%A1rio+total+e+por+n%C3%ADvel+de+ensino+%E2%80%93+Continente- 1112

Probst, G., & Borzillo, S. (2008). Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail.

European Management Journal, 26(5), 335-347. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2008.05.003

Ramos, J.L., Teodoro, V.D., & Ferreira, F. M. (2011). Recursos educativos digitais: Reflexões sobre a prática. Cadernos SACAUSEF VII, 11-34. Ministério da Educação e Ciência/DGIDC.

Sepúlveda, H., Moreira, L., Morais, C., & Paiva, J. C. (2015). Videotaped experiment in chemistry: Should I play it before or after sending students to the lab? Journal of Science

Education, 16(2), 63-65.

Sinha, S., Rogat, T. K., Adams-Wiggins, K. R., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2015). Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment. International

Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 273-307.

doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9218-y

Su, C. H., & Cheng, T. W. (2019). A sustainability innovation experiential learning model for virtual reality chemistry laboratory: An empirical study with PLS-SEM and IPMA

92

[Article]. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4), Article 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041027

Wallace, R. M. (2004). A Framework for Understanding Teaching With the Internet.

American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 447-488.

Wastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C., Quittre, V., Van de Gaer, E., & Monseur, C. (2013). The Use of ICT in Education: a survey of schools in Europe. European Journal of Education,

48(1), 11-27. doi:10.1111/ejed.12020

Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Seven Principles for Cultivating Communities of Practice. Retirado de

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265678077_Seven_Principles_for_Cultivatin g_Communities_of_Practice

Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Communities of practice - A brief introduction. Retirado de https://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/ Záhorec, J., Haškova, A., & Bilek, M. (2014). Impact of multimedia assisted teaching on student

attitudes to science subjects. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(3), 361-380. Retirado de https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-

93

Anexos