• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Pseudo-differential operators on a manifold, scalar case

distribution kernel Kp supported inside ΩU := (ϕ×ϕ)−1(Ω). Since ϕ(S) is a smoothing operator by the first part of the proof, we may as well assume that S= 0 so that P = Ψp. Under this assumption, we proceed as follows.

Let {χj} be a partition of unity on U such that suppχj ×suppχj ⊂ ΩU for every j. For each j we select an open neighborhood Uj of suppχj with Uj ×Uj ⊂ ΩU and a function χ0j ∈Cc(Uj) which is identically 1 on a neighborhood of suppχj. We consider the operator

Pj :=MχjP and observe thatPj =PjMχ0

j+Sj, withSj a smoothing operator supported in suppχj× Uj. We note that PjMχ0

j = Ψrj, whererj(x, ξ, y) = χj(x)p(x, ξ)χ0j(y).

We now observe thatKj = suppχ0j is compact and thatϕ(Kj)×ϕ(Kj)⊂Ω.Moreover, rj ∈ ΣdK

j. By application of Proposition 7.2.5 it follows that ϕrj) = Ψϕ(rj). The supports of the kernels of the operators Sj form a locally finite set, so that S :=P

jSj is a smoothing operator. Hence, so is ϕ(S).The sum P

jΨrj is locally finite, and therefore so is Q=P

jϕrj). Hence Q∈Ψd(V). We now note that P =X

j

Pj =X

j

Ψrj +S

so that ϕ(P) =Q+ϕ(S) is a pseudo-differential operator in Ψd(V).

Its principal symbol equals the principal symbol of Q, which is represented by the symbol q ∈Sd(V) given by

q(x, ξ) = X

j

ϕ(rj)(x, ξ, x)

= X

j

rj(ψ(x), dϕ(ψ(x))tξ, ψ(x))

= X

j

pj(ψ(x), dϕ(ψ(x))tξ)

= X

j

χj(ψ(x))p(ψ(x), dϕ(ψ(x))tξ)χ0j(ψ(x))

= X

j

χj(ψ(x))p(ψ(x), dϕ(ψ(x))tξ) = ϕ(p)(x, ξ).

7.3 Pseudo-differential operators on a manifold, scalar

Definition 7.3.1 Let d∈ R∪ {−∞}.A pseudo-differential operator P of order d on M is a continuous linear operator Cc(M) → C(M) given by a distribution kernel KP ∈ Γ−∞(M ×M,CM DM) such that the following conditions are fulfilled.

(a) The kernel KP is smooth outside the diagonal of M ×M.

(b) For each a ∈ M there exists a chart (Uκ, κ) containing a such that the operator Pκ :Cc(κ(U))→C(κ(U)) given by

Pκ(f)(κ(x)) =P(fκ)(x), (x∈U) belongs to Ψd(κ(U)).

Remark 7.3.2 Of course, by the Schwartz kernel theorem, each continuous linear oper-ator P :Cc(M)→C(M) is in particular continuous linear Cc(M)→C−∞(M), hence given by a distribution kernel KP ∈ Γ−∞(M ×M, DM ⊗CM). In the above formulation, the existence of the kernel is demanded in order not to rely on the kernel theorem.

Condition (a) asserts that KP has singular support contained in the diagonal of M, whereas condition (b) stipulates that the singularity along the diagonal is of the same type as that of the kernel of a pseudo-differential operator on Rn.

If ϕ : M → N is a diffeomorphism then by the nature of the definition the map ϕ : Ψd(M) → Ψd(N) is readily seen to be a linear isomorphism. Before proceeding we will show that the definition of pseudo-differential operator coincides with the old one in case M is an open subset of Rn.

Lemma 7.3.3 Let M be an open subset of Rn and let P : Cc(M) → C(M) be a continuous linear operator with distribution kernel KP. Then the following statements are equivalent.

(1) Conditions (a) and (b) of the above definition are fulfilled.

(2) P is a pseudo-differential operator in the sense of Definition 5.2.4.

Proof Clearly (2) implies (1), sinceM can be taken as the coordinate patch. We assume (1) and will prove (2).

We first assume that d = −∞. Then requirements (a) and (b) of Definition 7.3.1 guarantee that KP is smooth on all of M, hence that P is an integral operator with smooth kernel KP ∈Γ(M ×M,CM DM). Thus,P is an operator in Ψ−∞ in the sense of Definition 5.2.4.

We now assume that d ∈ R. By Lemma 6.1.6 each a ∈ M has an open neighborhood Ua in M such that the operator Pa : Cc(Ua) → C(Ua) given by f 7→ (P f)|Ua may be written asPa = Ψpa+Ta,withpa a symbol in Ψd(Ua) and with Ta∈Ψ−∞(Ua) a smoothing operator.

By paracompactness of M there exists a partition of unity {χj} on M such that for eachj the support of χj is contained in some set Uaj as above. We put Pj =Paj, pj =paj

and Tj =Taj.Then Pj = Ψpj +Tj.For each j we choose aχ0j ∈Cc(Uj) such thatχ0j = 1 on an open neighborhood of suppχj. Then χj(1−χ0j) = 0 so Tj0 := MχjP M(1−χ0j) has kernel [χj ⊗(1−χ0j)]KP which is smooth. The supports of these kernels form a locally finite collection, so thatT0 =P

jTj0 is a smoothing operator.

Moreover, we may write

MχjP Mχ0

j = Ψqj+MχjTjMχ0

j, withqj ∈Sd(M) supported by suppψj.It follows thatq =P

jqj is a locally finite sum and defines an element ofSd(M).Moreover, the smooth kernels of the operatorsMχjTjMχ0

j

are locally finitely supported in M ×M so that the operators sum up to a smoothing operator T.For f ∈Cc(M) we now have that

P f =X

j

χjP(χ0jf) +T0(f) = Ψq(f) +T(f) +T0(f)

and (2) follows.

If M is a smooth manifold, P : Cc(M) → C(M) a continuous linear operator, and U ⊂M an open subset, we agree to write PU for the operator Cc(U)→C(U) given by

PUf = (P f)|U, (f ∈Cc(U)).

The following results are now easy consequences of the definitions.

Exercise 7.3.4 If K ∈ Γ−∞(M ×M,CM DM) is the distribution kernel of P, then the restriction K|U×U is the distribution kernel of PU.

Exercise 7.3.5 LetM be a smooth manifold, andU ⊂M an open subset. Then for each P ∈Ψd(M), the operator PU belongs to Ψd(U).

In the sequel we shall make frequent use of the following results.

Lemma 7.3.6 Let P ∈Ψd(M) and let χ∈C(M).

(a) Let ψ ∈C(M) be such that suppψ∩suppχ=∅. Then MχPMψ ∈Ψ−∞(M).

(b) Let χ0 ∈C(M) be such that χ0 = 1 on an open neighborhood of supp χ. Then MχP −MχP Mχ0 ∈Ψ−∞(M).

Likewise, P Mχ−Mχ0P Mχ ∈Ψ−∞(M).

(c) Let {Pj} is a collection of operators from Ψd(M) such that the supports suppKPj of the distribution kernels form a locally finite collection of subsets of M×M. Then

X

j

Pj ∈Ψd(M).

Proof Let KP denote the distribution kernel of P. The distribution kernel K0 of the operator MχP Mψ equals K0 = (χ⊗ψ)KP. Since χ⊗ψ = 0 on an open neighborhood of the diagonal in M ×M,the kernel K0 is smooth. Hence (a).

We turn to (b). It follows from the hypothesis that (1−χ0) and χ have disjoint supports. Hence

MχP −MχP Mχ0 =MχP(I −Mχ0) = MχPM1−χ0 ∈Ψ−∞(M).

The second statement of (b) is proved in a similar way.

It remains to prove (c). Let Q = P

jPj. Then Q is a well defined continuous linear operator Cc(M) → C(M) with distribution kernel KQ = P

KPj. On the complement of the diagonal in M×M the kernel KQ is a locally finite sum of smooth functions, hence a smooth function. Let a∈M.There exists a coordinate patch U 3a whose closure in M is compact. The collection J of indices j for which suppKPj ∩(U ×U) 6= ∅ is finite. It follows that the kernel of QU equals

KQ|U×U =X

j∈J

KPj|U×U =X

j∈J

KPjU. Hence, QU equals the finite sum P

j∈JPjU and belongs to Ψd(U). It follows that Q ∈

Ψd(M).

Exercise 7.3.7 Let M be a smooth manifold, and P : Cc(M)→ C(M) a continuous linear operator with a distribution kernel that it smooth outside the diagonal in M ×M.

Let{Uj} be an open covering ofM. IfPUj ∈Ψd(Uj) for each j, then P ∈Ψd(M).

The following result indicates that pseudo-differential operators modulo smoothing op-erators behave like sections of a sheaf.

Lemma 7.3.8 Let {Uj} be an open covering of the manifold M.

(a) Let P, Q∈Ψd(M) be such that PUj =QUj for all j. Then P −Q∈Ψ−∞(M).

(b) Assume that for each j a pseudo-differential operator Pj ∈Ψd(Uj) is given. Assume furthermore that Pi =Pj on Cc(Ui∩Uj) for all indices i, j with Ui∩Uj 6=∅. Then there exist a P ∈Ψd(M) such that PUj −Pj ∈Ψ−∞(Uj) for all j. The operator P is uniquely determined modulo Ψ−∞(M).

Proof Let KP and KQ denote the distribution kernels of P and Q, respectively. Then KP|Uj×Uj andKQ|Uj×Uj are the distribution kernels ofPUj and QUj,respectively. It follows that KP−Q = KP −KQ is zero hence smooth on each of the sets Uj ×Uj, hence on the diagonal ofM×M.AsKP−Qis already smooth outside the diagonal, it follows thatKP−Q

is smooth on M ×M.Hence, P −Q∈Ψ−∞(M).

We turn to (b). Let Ω =∪jUj×Uj.Then Ω is an open neighborhood of the diagonal in M×M.LetKj ∈C−∞(Uj×Uj) denote the distribution kernel ofPj.LetUij :=Ui∩Uj 6=∅.

Then from the assumption it follows that Ki =Kj on (Ui ×Ui) ∩ (Uj ×Uj) =Uij ×Uij. From the gluing property of the sheafC−∞ on Ω it follows that there exists aK ∈C−∞(Ω) such that K =Kj onUj ×Uj for all j.

We will now use a cut off function to extendK to all ofM×M,leaving it unchanged on an open neighborhood of the diagonal. Let{χν}be a partition of unity of M,subordinate to the covering {Uj}. For each ν we select j(ν) such that suppχν ⊂ Uj(ν) and we fix a function χ0ν ∈ Cc(Uj(ν)) which is identically 1 on an open neighborhood of suppχν. The functions χν⊗χ0ν form a locally finitely supported family of functions in Cc(Ω).Put

ψ :=X

ν

χν ⊗χ0ν.

Let x ∈ M and let Nx be the finite collection of indices ν with x ∈ suppψν. Then the functionsχ0ν,forν ∈Nxare all 1 on a common open neighborhoodVx ofxinM.Moreover, P

ν∈Nxχν equals 1 on an open neighborhood Ux of x in M. It follows that ψ = 1 on Ux ×Vx. Hence, ψ = 1 on an open neighborhood of the diagonal in M ×M. Put P = P

νMχνPj(ν)Mχ0ν. Then P is a pseudo-differential operator on M with kernel equal to KP =X

ν

ν ⊗χ0ν)KPj =ψK.

For each j ∈U we have thatPUj has kernel

KP|Uj×Uj =ψK|Uj×Uj =ψKj.

It follows thatKP−KPj is smooth onUj×Uj,hencePUj−Pj ∈Ψ−∞(Uj).The uniqueness

statement follows from (a).

In fact, with a bit more effort it can be shown that Ψd−∞ defines a sheaf of vector spaces on M. More precisely, for two open subsets U ⊂ V of M the map P 7→ PU, Ψd(V) → Ψd(U) induces a restriction map Ψd(V)/Ψ−∞(V) → Ψd(U)/Ψ−∞(U) which we claim to define a sheaf. The following exercise prepares for the proof of this fact.

Exercise 7.3.9 Let Ω be smooth manifold, and let{Ωj}j∈J be an open cover of Ω.Assume that for each pair of indices (i, j) with Ωij := Ωi∩Ωj 6=∅a smooth function gij ∈C(Ωij) is given such that

gij+gjk +gkj = 0 on Ωijk := Ωi∩Ωj∩Ωk

for alli, j, k with Ωijk6=∅.Show that there exist functionsgj ∈C(Uj) such thatgi−gj = gij for all i, j. Hint: select a partition of unity {ψα}α∈A on Ω which is subordinate to the covering {Ωj}. Thus, a map j :A → J is given such that suppψα ⊂ Uj(α). Now consider gj :=P

αψαgjj(α). Exercise 7.3.10

(a) Show that with the restriction maps defined above the assignmentU 7→Ψd(U)/Ψ−∞(U) defines a presheaf onM.

(b) Show thatU 7→Ψd(U)/Ψ−∞(U) satisfies the restriction property of a sheaf.

(c) Use the previous exercise combined with the arguments of the proof of Lemma 7.3.8 to show that U 7→Ψd(U)/Ψ−∞(U) has the gluing property.