Publicações e trabalhos resultantes

A partir das investigações e dos trabalhos realizados, foram produzidos dois artigos publicados em conferências relevantes à comunidade iStar e, cienticamente, bem concei- tuadas. Além disso, foi possível com a orientação do autor deste trabalho o desenvolvi- mento e defesa de um trabalho de nal de curso. Esses trabalhos são listados a seguir, na ordem em que foram citados, respectivamente:

1. PENHA, F., LUCENA, M., LUCENA, L. R., AGRA, C., and ALENCAR, F. M. (2016). A Proposed Textual Model for i-Star. In iStar (pp. 7-12);

Uma Notação Textual Modular e Escalável para Modelos de Requisitos iStar 1_;

3. MEDEIROS, A. da C. SMiLeCompiler: Um Analisador Sintático e Semân- tico para Notação Textual dos Modelos iStar. 2017. 69 f. Monograa (Gra- duação) - Curso de Engenharia de Software, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2017.

Referências

[1] YU, E. S. Social modeling and i*. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Articial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), v. 5600 LNCS, n. c, p. 99121, 2009. ISSN 03029743.

[2] GUBBI, J. et al. Internet of things (iot): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future generation computer systems, Elsevier, v. 29, n. 7, p. 16451660, 2013. [3] REIJERS, H.; MENDLING, J. Modularity in process models: Review and eects. In:

SPRINGER. International Conference on Business Process Management. [S.l.], 2008. p. 2035.

[4] LANGLOIS, R. N. Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of economic behavior & organization, Elsevier, v. 49, n. 1, p. 1937, 2002.

[5] BARJIS, J. The importance of business process modeling in software systems design. Science of Computer Programming, Elsevier, v. 71, n. 1, p. 7387, 2008.

[6] SOMMERVILLE, I. Engenharia de software. [S.l.]: PEARSON BRASIL, 2011. ISBN 9788579361081.

[7] ANNERVAZ, K. et al. Natural language requirements quality analysis based on business domain models. In: IEEE. Automated Software Engineering (ASE), 2013 IEEE/ACM 28th International Conference on. [S.l.], 2013. p. 676681.

[8] LARKIN, J. H.; SIMON, H. A. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive science, Wiley Online Library, v. 11, n. 1, p. 65100, 1987.

[9] OTTENSOOSER, A. et al. Making sense of business process descriptions: An experimental comparison of graphical and textual notations. Journal of Systems and Software, Elsevier, v. 85, n. 3, p. 596606, 2012.

[10] YU, E. S.-K. Modelling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering. Tese (Doutorado), Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada, 1996. UMI Order No. GAXNN-02887 (Canadian dissertation).

[11] ESQUIVEL, H. E. A service-oriented approach for the i * framework. Tese (Doutorado)  Valencia University of Technolog, 2008.

[12] ANNOSI, M. C. et al. Analyzing software process alignment with organizational business strategies using an agent-and goal-oriented analysis technique-an experience report. In: iStar. [S.l.: s.n.], 2008. p. 912.

[13] CARVALLO, J. P.; FRANCH, X. On the use of i* for architecting hybrid systems: A method and an evaluation report. The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, Springer, p. 3853, 2009.

[14] PARNAS, D. L. On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Communications of the ACM, ACm, v. 15, n. 12, p. 10531058, 1972.

[15] BALDWIN, C. Y.; CLARK, K. B. Modularity in the design of complex engineering systems. In: Complex engineered systems. [S.l.]: Springer, 2006. p. 175205.

[16] SWELLER, J.; MERRIENBOER, J. J. V.; PAAS, F. G. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, Springer, v. 10, n. 3, p. 251296, 1998.

[17] ALENCAR, F. et al. Integration of aspects with i* models. AOIS 2006, 2006.

[18] ALENCAR, F. et al. Towards modular i* models. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. [s.n.], 2010. p. 292297. ISBN 978-1-60558-639-7. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1774088.1774150>.

[19] FRANCH, X. Incorporating Modules into the i* Framework. CAiSE, p. 13, 2010. [20] PAIVIO, A. Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian journal of

psychology, v. 45, n. 3, p. 255287, 1991.

[21] FRANCH, X. The i * framework: The way ahead (presentation). Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 2012 Sixth International Conference on, n. May, p. 13, 2012. ISSN 2151-1349.

[22] LIMA, P. et al. Scalability of iStar: a Systematic Mapping Study. Wer, v. 45, p. 289302, 2016.

[23] SOMERVELL, J.; CHEWAR, C.; MCCRICKARD, D. S. Evaluating graphical vs textual secondary displays for information notication. In: CITESEER. Proceedings of the ACM Southeast Conference. [S.l.], 2002. p. 153160.

[24] SNOOK, C.; HARRISON, R. Experimental comparison of the comprehensibility of a uml-based formal specication versus a textual one. In: CITESEER. Proceedings of 11 th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE. [S.l.], 2007.

[25] SHARAFI, Z. et al. An empirical study on the eciency of graphical vs. textual representations in requirements comprehension. In: IEEE. Program Comprehension (ICPC), 2013 IEEE 21st International Conference on. [S.l.], 2013. p. 3342.

[26] HAREL, D.; RUMPE, B. Modeling Languages : Syntax , Semantics and All That Stu. p. 128, 2000.

[27] NUNES, C. M. Uma linguagem de domínio especíco para a framework i. Dissertação (Mestrado)  FCT-UNL, 2009.

[28] LUCENA, M. et al. Stream: a strategy for transition between requirements models and architectural models. In: ACM. Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. [S.l.], 2011. p. 699704.

[29] ALENCAR, F. et al. Towards modular i* models. In: ACM. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. [S.l.], 2010. p. 292297.

[30] GENON, N.; HEYMANS, P.; AMYOT, D. Analysing the cognitive eectiveness of the bpmn 2.0 visual notation. Software Language Engineering, Springer, p. 377396, 2011. [31] BALDWIN, C. Y.; CLARK, K. B. Managing in an age of modularity. Managing in the

modular age: Architectures, networks, and organizations, Blackwell Publishing, v. 149, p. 8493, 2003.

[32] CARES, C.; GUTIÉRREZ, J. F. istarml: principles and implications. In: CEUR WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS. iStar 2011: proceedings of the 5th International i* workshop: 29-30th August, 2011, Trento, Italy. [S.l.], 2011. p. 813.

[33] BEDOYA, F. et al. istarjson: a lightweight data-format for i* models. In: CEUR-WS. ORG. iStar 2016: Proceedings of the Ninth International i* Workshop, co-located with the 24rd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2016): Beijing, China, September 12-13, 2016. [S.l.], 2016. p. 3742.

[34] CARES, C. et al. Towards interoperability of i* models using istarml. Computer Standards & Interfaces, Elsevier, v. 33, n. 1, p. 6979, 2011.

[35] CARES, C. Ccistarml (v0. 6): A java package for handling istarml les.

[36] MAZANEC, M.; MACEK, O. On general-purpose textual modeling languages. In: DATESO. [S.l.: s.n.], 2012. v. 12, p. 112.

[37] PETRE, M. Why looking isn't always seeing: readership skills and graphical programming. Communications of the ACM, ACM, v. 38, n. 6, p. 3344, 1995.

[38] GRÖNNINGER, H. et al. Textbased modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.6623, 2014. [39] ENGELEN, L.; BRAND, M. van den. Integrating textual and graphical modelling

languages. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Elsevier, v. 253, n. 7, p. 105120, 2010.

[40] BOUCHER, Q. et al. Introducing tvl, a text-based feature modelling language. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-intensive Systems (VaMoS'10), Linz, Austria, January. [S.l.: s.n.], 2010. p. 2729.

[41] CLASSEN, A.; BOUCHER, Q.; HEYMANS, P. A text-based approach to feature modelling: Syntax and semantics of tvl. Science of Computer Programming, Elsevier, v. 76, n. 12, p. 11301143, 2011.

[42] ABDELZAD, V. et al. A textual syntax with tool support for the goal-oriented requirement language. In: iStar. [S.l.: s.n.], 2015. p. 6166.

[43] MEDEIROS, A. d. C. SMiLeCompiler: Um Analisador Sintatico e Semaantico para Notacao Textual de Modelos iStar. Tese (Graduação em Engenharia de Software - TCC), Natal, RN, Brasil, 2017.

[44] CAVALCANTI, P. d. L. Mapeamento sistemático sobre escalabilidade do i* (ISTAR). Dissertação (Mestrado)  FCT-UNL, Recife, Pernabumco, 2015.

[45] CRESWELL, J. w. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. [S.l.]: SAGE Publications, Incorporated, 2009.

[46] HODGE, D. R.; GILLESPIE, D. Phrase completions: An alternative to likert scales. Social Work Research, Oxford University Press, v. 27, n. 1, p. 45, 2003.

[47] BRYMAN, A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative research, Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA, v. 6, n. 1, p. 97113, 2006.

[48] NORMAN, G. R.; STREINER, D. L. Biostatistics: the bare essentials. [S.l.]: PMPH-USA, 2008.

APÊNDICE A