Trabalhos Futuros

O m´etodo proposto foi implementado e comparado com os demais m´etodos analisa- dos nesta disserta¸c˜ao em trˆes bases diferentes, a BaseT este com cem mil e um milh˜ao de elementos no v´ertice D e a BaseF ilmes apresentada no apˆendice C. Essa an´alise de- monstrou a validade da Modelagem Participativa, entretanto novos experimentos devem ser feitos considerando:

• outros Sistemas Gerenciadores de Bancos de Dados voltados a Grafos, como o Aran- goDB e o OrientDB, cujo uso vˆem crescendo entre os desenvolvedores;

• outros equipamentos, com arquiteturas diferentes, com maior mem´oria, outros pro- cessadores, etc;

• outras configura¸c˜oes do Java, variando o Page Cache Sizing, o Heap Sizing e o Number of Open Files;

• outras bases, aplicando a modelagem a bases reais, com dados n˜ao fict´ıcios;

• outras modelagens da BaseT este conforme a Modelagem Participativa, onde dife- rentes respostas do projetista aos parˆametros do Grau de Incorpora¸c˜ao das Entida- des geram bases com estrutura diferentes, determinando o impacto das respostas no desempenho de acesso ao banco.

Outro trabalho futuro ´e o desenvolvimento de uma aplica¸c˜ao para a migra¸c˜ao de uma base relacional para um base voltada a grafos, conforme os crit´erios do m´etodo M 05.

A constata¸c˜ao de que nenhum dos m´etodos ´e mais eficiente em todos os cen´arios dessa base teste que os demais traz a luz a ideia de um outro m´etodo de modelagem que pode ser estudado e depois, se vi´avel, proposto. Neste novo m´etodo deve-se fazer um estudo dos v´ertices e relacionamentos para identificar um particionamento do grafo em diferentes grupos, que, conforme suas caracter´ısticas, poder˜ao ser ora migrados de acordo com o m´etodo M 01, outro grupo pelo m´etodo M 03 ou M 04 ou M 05.

Referências

ANGLES, R. A comparison of current graph database models. In: IEEE. Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW), 2012 IEEE 28th International Conference on. [S.l.], 2012. p. 171–177.

BATRA, S.; TYAGI, C. Comparative analysis of relational and graph databases. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), Citeseer, v. 2, n. 2, p. 509–512, 2012.

BORDOLOI, S.; KALITA, B. Designing Graph Database Models from existing relational databases. International Journal of Computer Applications, v. 74, n. 1, 2013.

BORDOLOI, S.; KALITA, B. ER Model to an Abstract Mathematical Model for Database Schema using Reference Graph. International Journal of Engineering Research And Development, e-ISSN, p. 51–60, 2013.

BREWER, E. A. Towards robust distributed systems. In: PODC. [S.l.: s.n.], 2000. v. 7. CHEN, P. P.-S. The entity-relationship model?toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), ACM, v. 1, n. 1, p. 9–36, 1976.

CODD, E. F. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM, v. 13, n. 6, p. 377–387, 1970.

DB-ENGINES. DBMS popularity broken down by database model. 2017. Dispon´ıvel em: <http://db-engines.com/en/rankingcategories>.

ERVEN, G. C. G. V. MDG-NoSQL: Modelo de Dados para Bancos NoSQL Baseados em Grafos. Disserta¸c˜ao (Mestrado) — Universidade de Bras´ılia, 2015.

FONG, J.; WONG, H. K.; CHENG, Z. Converting relational database into xml documents with dom. Information and Software Technology, Elsevier, v. 45, n. 6, p. 335–355, 2003.

FOWLER, M.; SADALAGE, P. J. NoSQL Essencial: Um Guia Conciso Para O Mundo Emergente Da Persistˆencia Poliglota. Novatec, 1a edi¸c˜ao, v. 1, n. 1.1, 2013.

GORDON, D. Warm the cache to improve performance from cold start. 2015. Dispon´ıvel em: <https://neo4j.com/developer/kb/warm-the-cache-to-improve-performance-from- cold-start/>.

GUNDY, K. V. Hot Ca$h: A Note on Performance Testing Neo4j. 2015. Dispon´ıvel em: <http://kvangundy.com/wp/hot-cache-testing-neo4j>.

HEUSER, C. A. Projeto de banco de dados: Volume 4 da S´erie Livros did´aticos inform´atica UFRGS. [S.l.]: Bookman Editora, 2009.

HUNGER, M. RDBMS to Graph. 2015. Dispon´ıvel em: <https://neo4j.com/blog/webinar-follow-relational-graph/>.

JAISWAL, G.; AGRAWAL, A. P. Comparative analysis of relational and graph databases. IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN), 2013.

KAGGLE. Oscar Nominations from 1927 to 2015. 2017. Dispon´ıvel em:

<https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/14493611/blog/data/oscars-1926-2015.csv>. KARP, P. D. A strategy for database interoperation. Journal of Computational Biology, v. 2, n. 4, p. 573–586, 1995.

LAKE, P.; CROWTHER, P. Concise guide to databases. [S.l.]: Springer, 2013.

LAMPOLTSHAMMER, T. J.; WIEGAND, S. Improving the computational performance of ontology-based classification using graph databases. Remote Sensing, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, v. 7, n. 7, p. 9473–9491, 2015.

LYSENKO, A. et al. Representing and querying disease networks using graph databases. BioData mining, BioMed Central, v. 9, n. 1, p. 23, 2016.

MARKOWITZ, V. M.; MAKOWSKY, J. A. Identifying extended entity-relationship object structures in relational schemas. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, IEEE, v. 16, n. 8, p. 777–790, 1990.

MONIRUZZAMAN, A. Newsql: towards next-generation scalable rdbms for online transaction processing (oltp) for big data management. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.7343, 2014.

NEO4J, T. Neo4j: The World Leading Graph Database. 2017. Dispon´ıvel em: <https://neo4j.com/product/>.

NEUBAUER, P. Neo4J JUG Karlsruhe. 2013. Dispon´ıvel em: <https://blog.synyx.de/2013/09/neo4j-jug-karslruhe/>.

NOSQL.ORG. NoSQL - Your Ultimate Guide to the Non-Relational Universe! 2017. Dispon´ıvel em: <http://nosql-database.org/>.

PARK, Y. et al. Graph databases for large-scale healthcare systems: A framework for efficient data management and data services. In: Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW), 2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on. [S.l.]: IEEE, 2014. p. 12–19. PRITCHETT, D. Base: An acid alternative. Queue, ACM, v. 6, n. 3, p. 48–55, 2008. QUIET AFFILIATE MARKETING. Free First-name and Last-name Databases (CSV and SQL). 2009. Dispon´ıvel em: <http://www.quietaffiliate.com/free-first-name-and- last-name-databases-csv-and-sql/>.

SEQUEDA, J. F.; ARENAS, M.; MIRANKER, D. P. On directly mapping relational databases to rdf and owl. In: ACM. Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. [S.l.], 2012. p. 649–658.

SIRIWARADHANA, S. From the entity-relationship to the property-graph model. 2014. Dispon´ıvel em: <http://lambdazen.blogspot.com.br/2014/01/from-entity-relationship- to-property.html>.

TEMPLE, O. popculture/IMDB 5000 Movie Dataset. 2016. Dispon´ıvel em: <https://data.world/popculture/imdb-5000-movie-dataset>.

TEOREY, T. J.; YANG, D.; FRY, J. P. A logical design methodology for relational databases using the extended entity-relationship model. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), ACM, v. 18, n. 2, p. 197–222, 1986.

VALE, V. Introdu¸c˜ao ao NoSQL. 2015. Dispon´ıvel em: <http://www.viniciusvale.com/nosql/>.

VIRGILIO, R. D.; MACCIONI, A.; TORLONE, R. Model-driven design of graph databases. In: Conceptual Modeling. [S.l.]: Springer, 2014. p. 172–185.

WARDANI, D. W.; KIING, J. Semantic mapping relational to graph model. In: IEEE. Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications (IC3INA), 2014 International Conference on. [S.l.], 2014. p. 160–165.