Com base nas limitações e lacunas desta dissertação, foram identificados como trabalhos futuros:
Aprofundar os estudos sobre o Contexto de Negócios visando detalhar e delinear o contexto de software dentro de um sistema; Realizar estudos e experimentos utilizando diferentes técnicas para
cada um dos subprocessos do Problem-Based SRS;
Verificar a aplicabilidade do método proposto em Engenharia de Sistemas;
Aprofundar estudos sobre a aplicação do Axioma 2 e elaborar experimentos com grupos diferentes para comparar a qualidade das especificações através de métricas do conteúdo da informação; Elaborar experimentos integrando o Problem-Based SRS com outros
REFERÊNCIAS
BLANK, S.; DORF, B. The Startup Owner's Manual. 1. ed. Pescadero, CA: K&S; Ranch., v. 1, 2012.
BOURQUE, P.; FAIRLEY, R. E. Guide to the Software Engineering
Body of Knowledge, Version 3.0. IEEE. Piscataway, NJ, p. 346. 2014.
COHN, M. User stories applied: For agile software development. 1. ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional, v. 1, 2009.
DARDENNE, A.; VAN LAMSWEERDE, A.; FICKAS, S. Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Science of computer programming 20.1, 1993.
DAVEY, B.; PARKER, K. Requirements elicitation problems: A literature analysis. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, p. 71-82, 2015. Disponivel em: <http://iisit.org/Vol12/IISITv12p071-082Davey1929.pdf>.
DAVIS, A. et al. Effectiveness of requirements elicitation techniques: Empirical results derived from a systematic review. 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'06). Minneapolis: IEEE. 2006. p. 179 - 188.
DO, S.-H. Software product lifecycle management using axiomatic
approach. In Anais do ICAD2004 - 3rd International Conference on Axiomatic
Design. Seoul: ICAD. 2004.
DORI, D. Object-process methodology: A holistic systems paradigm. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.
GIORGINI, P. et al. Reasoning with goal models. In Conceptual
Modeling-ER, p. 167-181, 2002.
GSMA. Agreement for International SMS Hubbing Services 7.0. GSMA. London, p. 73. 2012. (AA.71).
GUMMUS, B. Axiomatic product development lifecycle. [S.l.]. 2005. HARUTUNIAN, V.; TATE, D.; SUH, N. Decision making and software
tools for product development based on axiomatic design theory. CIRP
HEITMEYER, C. Re theory meets software practice: Lessons from the software development trenches. IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2007). [S.l.]: IEEE. 2007.
HOFMANN, H. F.; LEHNER, F. Requirements engineering as a success factor in software projects. IEEE Software, p. 58-66, 2001.
IBM, K. C. Rational Team Concert 4.0.5, 17 Nov 2015. Disponivel em: <http://www-
01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSCP65_4.0.5/com.ibm.rational.rrm.help. doc/topics/r_vision_doc.html?lang=en-us>.
IEEE, C. S. IEEE Std 830-1998. IEEE recommended practice for
software requirements specifications. [S.l.]. 1998.
IIBA, A. Guide to the business analysis body of knowledge (BABOK
Guide). International Institute of Business Analysis. Toronto, Ontario, p. 272.
2009.
INCOSE. INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook. 2015. ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, v. 1, 2015.
ISO. ISO/PAS 19450:2015 Automation systems and integration -
Object-Process Methodology. ISO. [S.l.]. 2015. (19450).
ISO; IEC; IEEE. Systems and Software Engineering - Vocabulary
ISO/IEC/IEEE 24765: 2010. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
Piscataway, NJ. 2010.
ISO; IEC; IEEE. Systems and Software Engineering -Requirements
Engineering. Technical report. 2011. ISO; IEC; IEEE. New York, p. 94. 2011.
(29148).
JACKSON, M. A. Problem analysis using small problem frames. South
African Computer Journal, p. 47-60, 1999.
JACKSON, M. A. Problem frames and software engineering. Information
and Software Technology, 2005. 903–912.
JACOBSON, I.; BOOCH, G.; RUMBAUGH, J. Unified Software
Development Process. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, v. 1, 1999.
LEFFINGWELL, D.; WIDRIG, D. Managing software requirements: a use case approach. 2. ed. [S.l.]: Addison-Wesley Professional, 2003.
MATTAR, F. N. Pesquisa de Marketing - Metodologia, Planejamento,
MCKEAN, E. The new oxford American dictionary. Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
NEILL, C. J.; LAPLANTE, P. A. Requirements engineering: the state of the practice. IEEE Software, p. 40-45, 2003.
NOVAKOVIC, D.; HUEMER, C. A survey on business context. In
Intelligent Computing, Networking, and Informatics, p. 199-211, 2014.
OSTERWALDER, A. et al. Value Proposition Design: How to Create Products and Services Customers Want. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons., 2014.
OSTERWALDER, A.; PIGNEUR, Y. Modeling value propositions in e-
Business. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Electronic
commerce. New York: ACM. 2003. p. 429-436.
PEREIRA, A. M. Abordagem de especificação de requisitos baseada em projeto axiomático. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Tecnológica
Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, p. 168, 2011.
PIMENTEL, A. R. Uma abordagem para projeto de software orientado a objetos baseado na teoria de projeto axiomático. Tese de Doutorado,
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, p. 189, 2007.
PIMENTEL, A. R.; STADZISZ, P. C. Application of the independence axiom on the design of object-oriented software using the axiomatic design theory. J. Integr. Des. Process Sci., p. 57–69, 2006.
RAMESH, B.; JARKE, M. Toward reference models for requirements traceability. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, v. 27, n. 1, 2001. 58-93.
SOMMERVILLE, I. Software Engineering 9th. 9. ed. Boston: Pearson, 2010.
STADZISZ, P. C. et al. Relatório de Pesquisa – Sistema MicroER. LIT/UTFPR. Curitiba. 2016.
SUH, N. P. The Principles of Design. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, Inc., 1990.
SUH, N. P. Designing-in of quality through axiomatic design. IEEE
Transactions on Reliability 44.2, Jun 1995. 256-264.
SUH, N. P. Axiomatic design: advances and applications. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2001.
SUH, N. P. Complexity: theory and applications. New York, USA.: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2005.
SUH, N. P.; DO, S.-H. Axiomatic design of software systems. CIRP
Annals-Manufacturing Technology, p. 95–100, 2000.
TATE, D. A Roadmap for Decomposition: Activi2 ties, Theories, and Toolsfor SystemDesign. Tese de Doutorado, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, p. 210, Jul 1999.
THOMPSON, M. K. Improving the requirements process in axiomatic design theory. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, p. 115 – 118, 2013. TRISHA., G.; PEACOCK., R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources.
BMJ, 2005. 1064-1065. Disponivel em:
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68>.
VAN LAMSWEERDE, A. Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a roundtrip from research to practice [engineering read engineering]. Requirements Engineering Conference. Kyoto, Japan: IEEE International. 2004. p. 4-7.
WIEGERS, K.; BEATTY, J. Software Requirements 3. Redmond: Pearson Education. Microsoft Press, 2013.
YU, E. et al. Social modeling for requirements engineering. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2011.
ZOWGHI, D.; COULIN, C. Requirements Elicitation: A Survey of Techniques, Approaches, and Tools, Engineering and Managing Software Requirements. Engineering and Managing Software Requirements, p. 19-46, 2005.
APÊNDICE A - COROLÁRIOS E TEOREMAS DO AD
Este anexo apresenta os corolários e teoremas extraídos de Suh (2001, 2005).