saber. É um olhar transportado
já na ponta do escalpelo. Nesse
sentido, o olhar anatómico é um
olhar avisado acerca de si próprio,
é um olhar que sabe que sabe, ou
seja, que se (re)conhece na teoria
que o informa, nos meios de
que faz uso e nos propósitos que
persegue. É um olhar que sabe
de antemão o que quer ver e que
para isso se serve sem hesitar dos
utensílios necessários.
Cascais, 2004, p. 131-132
Alvelos, H. & Almeida, M. (2013). Images we read / imagens que lemos: sistemas visuais na origem, produção e comunicação de conhecimento científico (conferência multidisciplinar na Universidade do Porto), retirado em outubro 31, 2013 de http://imagesweread.wordpress.com.
Alves, M. (2009). Desenho: a imagem do conhecimento. As estratégias do desenho taxonómico enquanto mediadoras da nossa relação com o mundo. Tese de Mestrado. Faculdade de Belas Artes da Universidade do Porto, Porto. Armstrong, D. (1987). Bodies of knowledge: Foucault and the problem of human anatomy. In Scrambler, G. (eds.). Sociological theory and medical sociology. London: Tavistock.
Aumont, J. (1990). A imagem. Lisboa: Papirus Editora.
Baer, K. (2010). Information design workbook: graphic approaches, solutions, and inspiration + 30 case studies. United States of America: Rockport Publishers. Balsamo, A. (1999). Technologies of the gendered body: reading cyborg women. United States of America: Duke University Press.
Barlowe, D. & Barlowe, S. (1997). Illustrating nature: how to paint and draw plants and animals. New York: Dover Publications.
Barthes, R. (1998). A câmara clara. Lisboa: Edições 70.
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: a necessary unity. New York: Dutton. Beauvoir, S. (1975). O segundo sexo. Lisboa: Bertrand. vol. 1
Berger, J. (2004). Modos de ver. Lisboa: Editorial Gustavo Gili. Bessa, P. (2005). Representações do masculino e do feminino na sinalética. Tese de Douturamento. Departamento de Comunicação e Arte da Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro.
Bierce, A. (1911). The devil’s dictionary. United States of America: Doubleday. Billing, C. M. (2008). Masculinity, corporality and the english stage, 1580-1635. United States of America: Ashgate
Buckley, C. (1989). Made in patriarchy: toward a feminist analysis of women and design. In Margolin, V. (eds.). Design discourse: history, theory, criticism (pp. 251-264). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: on the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York & London: Routledge.
Broch-Due, V. (1993). Making meaning out of matter: perceptions of sex, gender and bodies among the turkana. In Broch-Due, V., Rudie, I. & Bleie. T. (eds.). Carved flesh cast selves, gendered symbols and social practices (pp. 53-82). Oxford/Providence: Berg Publishers.
Cascais, A. F. (2004). Entrar pelos olhos dentro: a cultura visual da medicina. In Corpo, técnica, subjectividades, revista de comunicação e linguagens nº33, Junho de 2004. (organização de Maria Lucília Marcos e António Fernando Cascais). Lisboa: Relógio D’Água Editores.
Csordas, T. J. (1997). Computerized cadavers: shades of being and representation in virtual reality. Retirado em setembro 13, 2013 de http://www.focusing. org/apm_papers/compucad.html.
Dervin, B. (1999). Chaos, order, and sense-making: a proposed theory for infomation design. In Jcobson, R. (eds.). Information design (pp. 35-58). United States of America: The MIT Press.
Eco, U. (2004 [1973]). O signo. Lisboa: Ed. Presença.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (1992). Myths of gender: biological theories about women and men. United States of America: Basicbooks.
bibliografia / 105
Gender Spectrum. (2013). Understanding gender. retirado em agosto 22, 2013 de https://www.genderspectrum.org/about/understanding-gender. Gil, J. (1997). Metamorfoses do corpo. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água Editores (2ª Ed.) Goodall, P. (1983). “Design and gender”, Block 9
Graña, F. (2004). Ciencia y tecnología desde una perspectiva de género. Projeto “Constitución y reproducción de estereotipos masculinos en el aula”. Uruguai, Montevideo: Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Retirado em junho 12, 2013 de http://www.choike.org/ documentos/grania2004.pdf.
Guild of Natural Science Illustrators. (2010). Science illustration, what is science illustration? retirado em abril 27, 2013 de http://www.gnsi.org/ science-illustration.
Hall, B. S. (1996). The didactic and the elegant. In Baigrie, B. (eds.). Picturing knowledge, historical and philosophical problems concernig the use of art in science (pp. 3-39). Toronto, Buffalo & London: University of Toronto Press.
Hall, S. (1997). Introduction. In Hall, S. (eds). Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 1-11). London: Sage Publications. Henriques, A. M. (9 de Maio de 2013). Na dinamarca, o horário nobre é para avaliar corpo de mulheres. retirado em maio 10, 2013 de http://p3.publico. pt/actualidade/media/7865/na-dinamarca-horario-nobre-e-para-avaliar- corpo-de-mulheres.
Hodges, E. (2003). The guild handbook of scientific illustration. New Jersey: Wiley & Sons.
Horn, R. E. (1999). Information design: the emergence of a new profession. In Jcobson, R. (eds.) Information design (pp. 15-34). United States of America: The MIT Press.
Hubbard, R. (1990). The politics of women’s biology. United States of America: Rutgers.
Hüppauf, B. & Weingart, P. (2008). Images in and of science. In Weingart, P & Huppauf, B. (Eds). Science images and popular images of the sciences. (pp. 3-31). New York, London: Routledge
IJpma, F. F., van de Graaf, R. C., Nicolai, J. P. & Meek, M. F. (2006). The anatomy lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp by Rembrandt (1632): a comparison of the painting with a dissected left forearm of a dutch male cadaver. In The journal of hand surgery / Vol. 31A No. 6 Julho–Agosto 2006.
Jordanova, L. (1989). Sexual visions: images of gender in science and medicine between the eighteenth and twentieth centuries. Great Britain: University of Wisconsin Press
Kemp, M. (1996). Temples of the body and temples of the cosmos: vision and visualization in the vesalian and copernican revolutions. In Baigrie, B. (eds.). Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science. (pp. 40-85) Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press.
Kinross, R. (1989). The rhetoric of neutrality. In Margolin, V. (eds.). Design Discourse: history, theory, criticism (pp. 131-143). Chicago & London: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
Lankow, J., Ritchie, J. & Crooks, R. (2012). Infographics: the power of visual storytelling. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Laqueur, T. W. (1987). Orgasm, generation, and the politics of reproductive biology. In Gallagher, Catherine & Laqueur, Thomas Walter. (eds.). The making of the modern body: sexuality and society in the nineteenth century (pp. 1-41). London: University of California Press, Ltd. originalmente publicado em Representations, no. 14, Spring 1986.
106 / bibliografia
Laqueur, T. W. (1990). Making sex: body and gender from the greeks to freud. United States of America: Harvard University Press.
Lawrence, S. C. & Bendixen, K. (1992). His and hers: male and female anatomy in anatomy texts for U.S. medical students, 1890–1989. Faculty Publications, Department of History. Paper 35. retirado em março 23, 2013 de http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historyfacpub/35.
Lupton, E. (1989). Reading isotype. In Margolin, V. (eds.) Design discourse: history, theory, criticism (pp. 145-156). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Lupton, E. & Miller, A. (1999). Design writing research: writing on graphic design. London: Phaidon.
Machado, J. (1967). Dicionário etimológico da língua portuguesa, com a mais antiga documentação escrita e conhecida de muitos dos vocábulos estudados (2ª ed.). Lisboa: Editorial Confluência/Livros Horizonte.
Marques, D. (2013). O que é a ilustração científica e quais as suas utilizações?, Qual a diferença entre uma ilustração e uma fotografia?. Retirado em abril 27, 2013 de http://www.dianamarques.com/portugues/perguntas.html. Massironi, M. [1937], (2002). The psychology of graphic images: seeing, drawing, communicating. Nova Iorque: Phychology Press
Massironi, M. (1982). Ver pelo desenho: aspectos técnicos, cognitivos, comunicativos. Lisboa: Edições 70.
Moore, L. J. & Clarke, A. E. (1991). Clitoral conventions and transgressions: graphic representations in anatomy texts, c1900-1991. In Feminist studies, Vol. 21, No. 2 (Summer, 1995), pp. 255- 301. JSTOR
Nead, L. (1992). The female nude: art, obscenity and sexuality. Londres e Nova Iorque: Routledge.
Omoregie, V. (2013). Vanessa Omoregie’s Camgirls Project. retirado em novembro 12, 2013 de http://zodculture.com/vanessa-omoregies-camgirls- project/.
O’Sullivan, T., Hartley, J., Saunders, D., Montgomery, M. & Fiske, J. (1994). Key concepts in communication and cultural studies. USA and Canada: Routledge (2ª Edição).
Ortner, S. B. (1974). Is female to male as nature isto culture? In Rosaldo, M. Z. & Lamphere, L. (eds.). Woman, culture, and society (pp. 68-87). Stanford,CA: Stanford University Press.
Pauwels, L. (2006). Introduction: the role of visual representation in the production of scientific reality. In Pauwels, L. (eds). Visual cultures of science: rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication (pp. vii-xix). United States of America: University Press of New England.
Pauwels, L. (2006). A theoretical framework for assessing visual representational practices in knowledge building and sciences communications. In Pauwels, L. (eds). Visual cultures of science: rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication (pp. 1-25). United States of America: University Press of New England. Petherbridge, D. & Jordanova, L. (1997). The quick and the dead: artists and anatomy. Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press. Pettersson, R. (2002). Information design: an introduction. United States of America: John Benjamins Publishing.
Petersen, A. (1998). Sexing the body: representations of sex differences in Gray’s anatomy, 1858 to the present. In Body & society, March 1998 vol. 4 no. 1 (pp. 1-15). London, Thousand Oaks e New Deli: Sage Publications.
Quental, J. (2009). A ilustração enquanto processo e pensamento. Autoria e Interpretação. Tese de Douturamento. Departamento de Comunicação e Arte da Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro.
Riley, P. (2011). The art of illustrating extinct life (picture of the day). Encyclopædia Britannica. Retirado em 3 março, 2013 de http://www. britannica.com/blogs/2011/11/art-illustrating-extinct-life-picture-day. Rogers, R., Stevenson, M. & Weltevrede, E. (2009). Social research with the web: digital methods initiative. Retirado em novembro 2, 2013 de http:// www.govcom.org/.
Rose, G. (2012). Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Schiebinger, L. (1987). Skeletons in the closet: the first illustration of the female skeleton in eighteenth-century anatomy. In Gallagher, C. & Laqueur, T. W. (eds.). The making of the modern body: sexuality and society in the nineteenth century (pp. 42-82). London: University of California Press, Ltd. Schiebinger, L. (1989). The mind has no sex? women in the origins of modern science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Simpson, M. (1994). Here comes the mirror men. In The Independent, London, Nov. 15, Retirado em junho 16, 2013 em www.marksimpson.com/ pages/journalism/mirror_men.html.
Stheir, A. B. & Lightman, B. (2006). Introduction. In Stheir, A. B. & Lightman, B. (eds.). Figuring out: science, gender and visual culture (pp. xv- xxx). United States of America: University Press of New England. Sturken, M, & Cartwright, L. (2001). Practices of looking: an introduction to visual culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Suleiman, S. R. (1985). Introduction. In Suleiman, S. R. (eds.). The female body in western culture: contemporary perspective (pp. 1-4). United States of America: Harvard College
Topper, D. (1996). Towards an epistemology of scientific illustration. In Baigrie, B. (Eds.). Picturing knowledge, historical and philosophical problems concernig the use of art in science (pp. 214-249). Toronto, Buffalo & London: University of Toronto Press.
Tufte, E. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Nuneaton: Graphics Press.
Tufte, E. (1990). Envisioning information. Chesmire, Connecticut: Graphics Press LLC
Tufte, E. (2006). Beautiful evidence. Chesmire, Connecticut: Graphics Press LLC
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tratactus logico-philsophicus, Londres: Kegan Paul Wood, P., AMI & GNSI. (1994). Scientific illustration: a guide to biological, zoological, and medical rendering techniques, design, printing, and display. United States of America: John Wiley & Sons. (2ª Edição)
World Health Organization [WHO]. (2013). What do we mean by “sex” and “gender”?. retirado em outubro 3, 2014 de http://www.who.int/gender/ whatisgender/en/.