• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Summary of part II: the homogeneous Universe - MESONPI

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Share "Summary of part II: the homogeneous Universe - MESONPI"

Copied!
51
0
0

Texto

(1)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Friedmann’s Equation

Energy Conservation

Summary of part II: the homogeneous Universe

Two paths: Newtonian General Relativity

Energy conservation (of test

particle) in spherical gravitational potential

First law of

thermodynamics

(+ special relativity)

(2)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Friedmann’s Equation

Energy Conservation

Summary of part II: the homogeneous Universe

Two paths: Newtonian General Relativity

Energy conservation (of test

particle) in spherical gravitational potential

First law of

thermodynamics (+ special relativity)

G µ⌫ = 8⇡ GT µ⌫

Homogeneous and isotropic line element

+ Einstein’s equation

(3)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Summary of part II: the homogeneous Universe

Two paths: Newtonian General Relativity

Homogeneous and isotropic line element

+ Null geodesic:

(4)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Summary of part II: the homogeneous Universe

Two paths: Newtonian General Relativity

a(t)dr = dt

Light propagation in co-moving coordinates ( c =1 )

Homogeneous and isotropic line element

+ Null geodesic:

(5)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Summary of part II: the homogeneous Universe

Two paths: Newtonian General Relativity

a(t)dr = dt

Light propagation in co-moving coordinates ( c =1 )

Homogeneous and isotropic line element

+ Null geodesic:

Flux:

(6)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Summary of part II: the homogeneous Universe

Two paths: Newtonian General Relativity

a(t)dr = dt

Light propagation in co-moving coordinates ( c =1 )

Homogeneous and isotropic line element

+ Null geodesic:

Flux:

For K = 0

(7)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Summary of part II: the homogeneous Universe

Two paths: Newtonian General Relativity

a(t)dr = dt

Light propagation in co-moving coordinates ( c =1 )

Homogeneous and isotropic line element

+ Null geodesic:

Flux:

For K = 0

(8)

Copyleft Martín Makler

The Dark Side of the Universe

Episode II

The Accelerating

Universe

(9)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Type Ia Supernovae and Cosmology

Advantages:

Extreme Luminosities (10 9 - 10 10 L )

 May be detected at

large distances

(10)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Very homogeneous

 Standardizable candles

Type Ia Supernovae Light Curves

(11)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Type Ia Supernovae and Cosmology

Advantages:

Extreme Luminosities (10 9 - 10 10 L )

Very homogeneous

 Standardizable candles

Disadvantages:

• Rare and random events

~ 1/500 yr/galaxy

• Short duration

Solution:

• Automated search

• SCP, High-z team

(12)

Copyleft Martín Makler

The Accelerating Universe

Dark Energy or Cosmological Constant

• Hubble diagram for large distances

The expansion is accelerating

But

(13)

Copyleft Martín Makler

The Decelerated Universe!

(14)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Current Results

14

Betoule, et al. ApJ, 2014, 568, A22;

arXiv:1401.4064

Joint light-curve analysis (JLA)

p = w ⇢

Combined with CMB (+flat):

Combined with BAO (+flat):

(15)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Scale factor

Evolution of the Universe (Λ = 0)

Age x H 0 -1 a

Figure: Kepler Oliveira, Maria de Fátima Saraiva Astronomia e Astrofísica, http://astro.if.ufrgs.br /

Age of the Universe

(16)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Age of the Universe

 Acceleration

solves the age problem

Figure: Kepler Oliveira, Maria de Fátima Saraiva, Astronomia e Astrofísica, http://astro.if.ufrgs.br /

(17)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Dark Energy

2/3 of the energy density of the Universe are in the form of Dark Energy! (or Λ = 0)

Evidences:

 Accelerated expansion of distant galaxies

 Age of the Universe

 Small curvature

 Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect

 Combined analyses of cosmological observables (cosmic concordance)

Candidates (Taxonomy of Dark Energy):

 Cosmological constant

 Scalar field:

– Quintessence

– Quartessence, k-essence, spintessencia, snot...

Modified gravity

(18)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Part III

The Homogeneous Universe II:

A Brief Thermal History of the Universe

(19)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Nucleosynthesis:

Alchemy in the primordial Universe

Production of 7 Li, 3 He, D, 4 He

z ~ 10 4 , 3MeV,T ~ 10 10 K - 10 9 K, 1s a 3min “after BB”

Cartoon from http://blueox.uoregon.edu/~karen/astro123/lectures/lec20.html

(20)

Copyleft Martín Makler

(

Light Element Production

Figure: Kepler Oliveira, Maria de Fátima Saraiva Astronomia e Astrofísica, http://astro.if.ufrgs.br /

Radiation dominated

Universe: )

Radiation dominated Universe:

• H = H(T)

• interaction rate f(T) depends only on

η = n b /n γ

(21)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Light Element Abundance

Production of 7 Li, 3 He, D, 4 He with the same η !

D is the best “baryometer”

Independent of

Dark Matter

(22)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Recombination

Happens at 0.26eV instead of 13.6eV!

plasma

neutral matter

Figure from http://blueox.uoregon.edu/~karen/astro123/lectures/lec20.html

(23)

Copyleft Martín Makler

When the temperature drops below 3.000K the electrons get bounded to the nuclei

 The Universe becomes transparent

 Light propagates freely

Figure from http://blueox.uoregon.edu/~karen/astro123/lectures/lec21.html

Recombination

(24)

Copyleft Martín Makler

The Cosmic Microwave Background

“Photosphere”

seen from our galaxy

Expect to see:

Black body with redshift

z ~ 1000

(25)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Spectrum of the CMB

Wavelenght [cm -1 ]

100σ error bars

thermal spectrum with

T = 2.725 ± 0.002 K

(26)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Cosmic Microwave Background I

Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Map

 Epoch of matter and radiation decoupling (about 380.000 years after the “Big-Bang”).

T 0 = 2.725 ± 0.002. Redshift, z = 1089.

 Highly homogeneous primordial Unverse

Dipole: ΔT = 3.346 ± 0.017 mK  v gal = 360 Km/s

Contrast: 1x 400x

(27)

Cosmic Microwave Background I

Copyleft Martín Makler

Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Map

 Epoch of matter and radiation decoupling (about 380.000 years after the “Big-Bang”).

T 0 = 2.725 ± 0.002. Redshift, z = 1089.

 Highly homogeneous primordial Unverse

Dipole: ΔT = 3.346 ± 0.017 mK  v gal = 360 Km/s

Contrast: 1x 400x

(28)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Some Milestones in the History of the Universe

kT (radiation) Event 2 x 10 -4 eV Today

10 -3 eV Galaxy formation

0.26 eV H recombination ( matter-radiation decoupling )

10 eV Matter domination

300 keV Formation of light elements (He 4 , He 3 , D e Li)

(primordial nucleosynthesis)

0.5 MeV End of leptonic era ( e

+

e

-

annihilation )

100 MeV End of hadronic era and beginning of leptonic era

( hadronization, annihilation hadron anti-hadron )

1000 GeV Electroweak phase transition

10 15 GeV Bariosynthesis? Great Unification?

10 19 GeV End of quantum era? Inflation?

(29)

Copyleft Martín Makler

The Perturbed Universe CMB anisotropies and

Large-scale Structure

(30)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Anisotropies in the Cosmic Background

T 0 = 2.725 ± 0.002.

redshift, z = 1089

 The primordial Universe was highly homogeneous

 Dipole:

Δ T = 3.346 ± 0.017 mK

v gal = 360 Km/s

 Temperature fluctuations:

Nobel prizes: 1978, 2006

(31)

Copyleft Martín Makler

WMAP2008

Cosmic Microwave Background

Power Spectrum

(32)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Planck 2015 Anisotropy Map

32

(33)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Relativistic perturbation theory

 The starting point is the perturbed Robertson-Walker metric

 At the linear level modes decouple

 Scalar perturbations:

(for a perfect fluid Φ = Ψ)

(34)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Results from the linear analysis

Need for Dark Matter

 Baryonic matter: can only cluster after decoupling t dec ~ 380.000 years

and for r > λ J (Jeans length)

 Cold Dark Matter starts clustering at t eq ~ 56.000 years (matter-radiation equality)

 Baryons follow the Dark Matter potential wells

 Silk damping decreases the amplitude of baryon

perturbations

(35)

Copyleft Martín Makler

CMB Anisotropies

 Primary Anisotropies

Doppler effect

Intrinsic temperature fluctuation

Sachs-Wolfe effect

 On large scales

 Sachs-Wolfe plateau

 On small scales:

baryon acoustic oscillations

(36)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Integrated Sachs-Wolfe Effect

 Cumulative effect of gravitational shifts

 Linear evolution, Ω M = 1  φ = const.

 Late effect:

 Correlation between the cosmic microwave background and large-scale structure!

Dark Energy

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/19419

(37)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Combining the Contributions

 Damping:

 Photon diffusion in hot regions (Silk damping)

 Finite thickness of last scattering surface

ht tp: // ba ckground.uc hi ca go.e du/ ~w hu/ phys ic s/ tour .ht m l

(38)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Angular Power Spectrum

+polarização…

• As predicted

• Concordance model

• Only 6

parameters fit the data!

l

l ≈ 180°/θ

WMAP5

(39)

d A ⌘ D

(for ✓ ⌧ 1)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Angular Diameter Distance

39

Standard ruler

d A may decrease with z!

D = a (t 1 ) r 1

thus such that d A = a (t 1 ) r 1

(40)

d A ⌘ D

(for ✓ ⌧ 1)

d A = (1 + z ) 2 d L

Copyleft Martín Makler

Angular Diameter Distance

40

Standard ruler

D = a (t 1 ) r 1

thus such that d A = a (t 1 ) r 1

Valid for any space-time!

(41)

Angular scale of acoustic horizon at decoupling:

Acoustic horizon

Angular diameter distance

At z ~ 1000 is mostly sensitive on For a flat Universe,

Copyleft Martín Makler

Peaks in the Cosmic Microwave Background

where Sta nda rd rule r

AK = 1 ⌦ 0

A ' 1

(42)

Copyleft Martín Makler

The Universe is flat!

Dark Matter Dark Energy

Power spectrum according to WMAP5

l

(43)

Copyleft Martín Makler

The wholly grail of Cosmology

Dark Matter and Dark Energy

ordinary matter: 4%

Dark

matter:

~ 22%

The Universe is (almost) flat remaining ∼ 74%:

dark energy

l

(44)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Planck 2015 power spectrum

44

Planck collaboration, 2016, A&A 594, A11 (2016)

(45)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Secondary Anisotropies

 Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect

 Gravitational Lensing

 Rees-Sciama effect

 Gravitational waves

 Scattering: reionization

and Sunyaev Zel’dovich

(46)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Sunyaev Zel’dovich Effect

 Efeito Compton inverso

 Distorção da RCF em escalas de arcmin

 Independente de z

(47)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Advantage of Sunyaev Zel’dovich Effect

 X-ray flux drops as (1 + z ) -4

 Decrement is independent from z

X-ray emission

SZ effect

(48)

Copyleft Martín Makler

CMB Polarization

(49)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Polarization Spectrum

 TE and EE components

 BB component

 Gravitational

waves

(50)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Planck Polarization Map

50

(51)

Copyleft Martín Makler

Polarization Power Spectra

51

Planck 2015

Imagem

Figure from http://blueox.uoregon.edu/~karen/astro123/lectures/lec20.html
Figure from http://blueox.uoregon.edu/~karen/astro123/lectures/lec21.html

Referências