• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis."

Copied!
9
0
0

Texto

Loading

Imagem

Figure 1. Flowchart for study selection.
Figure 3. Forest plot for secondary outcomes associated with biodegradable polymer BES versus durable polymer DES

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Cost-effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of complex coronary stenoses: results from the sirolimus- eluting balloon expandable stent in the treatment of

Impact of chronic renal insufficiency on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare metal stents.

Esses resultados permitem confirmar que Compêndio de literatura infantil: para o 3 o ano normal (1959), de Bárbara Vasconcelos de Carvalho, foi o primeiro do gênero a

Implantation of the biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent in patients with high SYNTAX score is associated with decreased cardiac mortality compared to a permanent

(2006) [4], “Drug- eluting stents versus arterial myocardial revascularization in patients with diabetes mellitus”, é evidente a vantagem da revascularização cirúrgica sobre

in 2006 [4], “Drug- eluting stents versus arterial myocardial revascularization in patients with diabetes mellitus”, it is evident that there is an advantage of coronary artery

A comparison of clinical and angiographic outcomes after Excel bioabsorbable polymer versus Firebird durable polymer rapamycin-eluting stent for the treatment of coronary artery

Revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction: everolimus-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass