ABSTRACT
ORIGINAL AR
INTRODUCTION
Mentaldisordershavehighratesofpreva-lenceinthegeneralpopulationandrepresent a significant potential demand for basic healthcareservices.Itisestimatedthat25to 30%ofconsultationsingeneraloutpatient servicesarerelatedtosuchproblems.1-4
How-ever,generalpractitionersfinditdifficultto diagnose and apply effective treatments to mental disorders.5 Furthermore, they are
usually very busy, and also skeptical about theirroleinmentalhealthassistance.6
Thedifficultyindiagnosingisthought to be not only due to lack of time for seeing such patients, but also because specific skills are needed for practicing goodoutpatientmedicalcare.7Physicians
aretrainedtodiagnoseaccordingtoillness categorybut,withregardtomentalprob-lems, they have difficulties in using psy-chopathologicallanguage.Oneimportant challenge in diagnosing mental disorders istheimprecisebiologicalbasisforthem, althoughrecentadvancesinneurosciences havebeenbringinginmeaningfulcontri-butions.Classificationsystemsformental disorders,suchastheDiagnosticandSta-tistical Manual of Mental Disorders and theClassificationofMentalandBehavioral Disorders,primarycareversion,havealso contributed towards an integrated evalu-ationofpatients,buttheymaybenotso accessibleforthegeneralpractitioner.8,9
Treatmentisanotherchallengethatneeds tobefacedfromvariousangles:development of communication skills, consideration of whichinterventionsaremostavailableand most appropriate among a broad range of existing treatments, prescription of drugs according to the best scientific evidence, considerationforpatients’preferencesand, finally,recognitionoftheinevitablelimita-tions.10,11Consequently,aswellastheneed
fornewknowledge,achangeofattitudeis required,andthiswillhaveaninfluenceon thelearningprocess,aswellasonthecontact withthepatients.12,13
A thorough review of the literature on mental health and primary healthcare reveals that psychiatrists and general practitioners do not always agree in their opinionsonthemostimportanttopicsto bediscussedwithincontinuingeducation. Furthermore,programsfocusedexclusively onthediagnosisanduseofmedicinesmay disregardthemaingoalforclinicalpractice in primary care: the capacity to develop and maintain a relationship with patients whohavecomplexproblems,withtheaim of facilitating attendance and treatment effectiveness.Evaluationofstudiesonthe teachingofpsychiatryinprimarycarepoint towardsthesamefact:toenableacquisition ofnewknowledgeandskills,anopenatti-tudeandengagementareneededinrelation totheattendanceofpatientswithmental problems. Programs based exclusively on knowledgehavehadlittleornoimpacton changesinattitude.Itisnecessarytoinclude opportunities for general practitioners to discuss their perceptions of psychiatry, mentalproblemsandtheattentiongivento theseproblemsinthehealthsystem.14
Thepresentstudywasdevelopedwithin atrainingprogramforgeneralpractitioners whoworkinprimarycareservices,withthe objective of ascertaining these profession-als’ opinions about attendance for people withmentalproblems,sothateducational techniquesregardingmentalhealththattake theseprofessionals’learningcharacteristics intoaccountcanbedeveloped.
POPULATION AND METHODS
The study followed a qualitative ap-proach towards evaluating the opinions
strategiesformedicaleducation
UniversidadeFederaldeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,Brazil
CONTEXTANDOBJECTIVE:Withinthecontext of primary health care and mental disorders, our aim was to study the opinions of general practitioners regarding attendance of people withmentalhealthproblems.
DESIGNANDSETTING:Qualitativefocalgroup study among primary care services in the cit-ies of Porto Alegre and Parobé, State of Rio GrandedoSul.
METHODS:Adeliberatelyselectedsampleof41 generalpractitionerswhowereworkinginbasic healthservicesmetinfocalgroups.Twovideos werepresented,whichsimulatedconsultations forpatientswithdepressionandpsychoses.The discussionsabouttheidentificationandhandling ofmentalhealthproblemswererecordedand assessedviacontentanalysis.
RESULTS:Theopinionsrelatedtothedifficulties ofdiagnosingandtreatingmentalproblems,the involvement of relatives in caring for patients, thedifficultyofcompliancewiththetreatment, theuncertaintyexperiencedbyphysiciansand thedifficultyofreferringpatientstospecialized services.
CONCLUSIONS: The general practitioners indicatedthattheyperceivedthementalhealth problemsamongtheirclientele,butthediagnosis andtreatmentoftheseproblemsarestillseenas ataskforspecialists.Thechallengeofcontinuing education on mental health requires methods ofinteractiveandcriticalteaching,suchasthe problem-basedapproach.
of a group of 41 physicians (internists, pediatricians, gynecologists-obstetricians, occupational health physicians and fam-ily and community physicians) who were workinginprimarycareservicesinthecit-iesofPortoAlegreandParobé,StateofRio Grande do Sul.The choice of population was deliberate: the participants were resi-dentphysiciansinfamilyandcommunity medicine from Murialdo Health Center, StateHealthDepartmentofRioGrandedo Sul,andfromtheoutpatientdepartmentof ashoefactory.
The technique for data collection consistedoffocalgroups.Theparticipants weregatheredinthreegroups:twooften individuals each and a third group of 21 individuals. The meetings of the groups werepartofatrainingprograminmental health,andtheywereprecededbyanother three meetings that had the objective of examining case studies regarding seven mentalhealthproblems(depression,sleep-ingproblems,alcoholanddrugproblems, anxiety,dementiaandunexplainedsomatic complaints).Twovideosproducedespecially forthisstudyandwerepresentedinthefo-calgroups,whichsimulatedconsultations forpatientswithdepressionandpsychoses thatlastedfor8and5minutes,respectively. Initially, some questions were put to the groups,tostimulatetheparticipantstoex-presstheiropinionsabouttheidentification andmanagementoftheproblemspresented in the videos.The conversations were re-cordedandtranscribed.Eachsessionlasted around60minutes,withactiveanddiffer-ent manifestations from the participants. Thestrategyofusingfocalgroupshadthe objectiveofgatheringopinionsthatcould helpinidentifyingbarriersagainstchange andinplanninginterventions.15-17
Thevideosfollowedascheduleinrelation to diagnostic aspects (present complaints, diagnosticcriteriaanddifferentialdiagnosis) andtreatment(essentialinformationforthe patient and relatives, recommendations for thepatientandrelatives,medicationandthe advicetoseekaspecialist),basedontheClas-sificationofMentalandBehavioralDisorders, primarycareversion.18
Thetranscribedtextsfromthegroupre-cordingswereassessedviathecontentanalysis technique.19Theanalysiscategorieswerebuilt
upfromtheunitsofmeaningthatwereiden-tifiedandtheobservedmaterial.Qualitative researchevidencemaybeveryusefulinhealth serviceevaluationandhelpincomprehending humanbehaviorinitssocialcontext.20
RESULTS
The reports from the groups showed severalindicatorsofphysicians’opinions,and analysisofthecontentofthetextsallowedthe followingcategoriestobedrawnup:
1.Opinions about the diagnosis of the problem
“Istartedlookingdifferentlyatthose patientswhoarealwaysinthehealth center and asking them other kinds ofquestions”.
“Generalpractitionershaveaharder investigativetask.Patientsmayarrive atthehealthcenterwithalotofcom-plaints,andwearetheonestoraisethe hypothesisofapsychiatricillness”.
Thephysiciansagreedthatmentalprob-lemsareverycommoninbasichealthcare servicesandconsideredthattheycouldtake careofthesepeopleiftheyreceivedthenec-essarytraining.Theyagreedthat,atmedical school,theteachingisdirectedtowardsthe trainingofspecialists,andthatiswhythey tendedtothinkthatlongconsultationsare neededinrelationtomentalproblems,i.e. “psychiatrist’stime”.Theyconsideredthat complementary tests are sometimes indis-pensable for the diagnosis.They found it necessarytofitthetheoreticalknowledgein withthepractice,andtoaskquestionssuch as:Howshouldthenormalbedifferentiated fromthepathological?Whataretheclues for the diagnosis? How should diagnostic categories be used? How should suicide riskbeidentifiedrisk?Howshouldorganic causesbeidentified?
2. Opinions about the handling of the problem
“Ingeneral,weleavecollegeknow-ing the theory. What we lack is hands-onpractice.”
“What we see the most is the pre-scriptionofbenzodiazepinetotreat sadnessratherthandepression...It’s easier, so that the patient doesn’t talkduringtheconsultation,which wouldmakeitlonger.”
Thegroupsfeltmoreconfidentabout dealing with depressive patients, but ex-pressedtheirinexperienceregardingsevere mentalproblemssuchaspsychoses.Some characteristicsthatwouldmakingattending psychotic patients more difficult were the
longtermevolution,theriskofaggression andthelongertimerequiredforattending tothem.
The physicians considered that there wereproblemsincontinuingthetreatment between crises, because of the difficulty in obtaining compliance from the patients. They recognized the importance of the physician’sattitudeinlinkingtheirtraining withthecontinuityofthetreatment,i.e.the waythephysiciantalkswithpatients:howhe advisesthemandexplainsabouttheillness. They became aware that they had doubts abouthowtohandlecriticalsituations,such assuicide,andconsideredthatthephysician, thehealthcareteamandthefamily’sconduct hasanimpactonthesecriticalevents.Home visitswereseenasastrategyforimproving therelationshipbetweenthehealthcareteam andthepatient.
Inthegroups’opinions,thetherapeutic arsenalincludesmedicines,psychotherapy, familysupportandactivities.Somedilem-mascameup:Whenshouldoneprescribe a drug? How should the medication be adjusted? When should one indicate psychotherapy? How should emergencies be dealt with? When should one indicate hospitalization? How should other sup-portservicesforthepatientbeused?How shouldthecontinuityofthetreatmentbe maintained?Facedwiththesedilemmas,the physiciansexpressedthefearofhavinginad-equateconduct,aswellasthesurprisethat itmightbepossibletosolvetheproblem. Theyadmittedthatitwaspossibletotreat mental health problems in primary care, recognizing the importance of the setting forhandlingthepatient.Theyquestioned theindiscriminateuseofmedicines,espe-ciallybenzodiazepine,andbelievedthatthe formationofatherapeuticlinkissomething thatrequiresalongtime.
3.Effectofthefamilyonthepatient
Inthegroups’opinions,therewasaneed forinvolvementbythepatients’familiesas allies in working towards success for the treatment.However,atthesametime,they noticed that some families were reckless towardsthepatient’scare.Theyconsidered thatphysiciansmustexercisearesponsibil-ity regarding the relatives of people with mentalproblems.
4.Patients’feelingsperceivedbythephysician
“Ifthegeneralpractitionergivesthe psychiatric diagnosis, the patient doesn’t accept it, but when the specialistsaysso,it’salaw.” “When the patient goes to the psy-chiatrist he already has the notion thathehasapsychiatricillness;he’s alreadyacceptedthat.”
The physicians noticed the difficulty thatpatientshadinacceptingthediagnosis and complying with the treatment.They considered that the teaching model used formedicine,whichisdirectedtowardsthe trainingofspecialists,isexposedtodiscredit frompatientsinrelationtogeneralpracti-tioners, and that this generates insecurity forclinicalpractice.
5. Feelings provoked in the physician by thepatient
“Thepsychiatricpatientcausesfearin thephysician,orthefearofnotknow-inghowtodealwiththesituation.” “Theyhavealotofproblemsandget depressed. I think, if it was me, I’d alreadyhavekilledmyself.It’scompli-catedtodealwiththat.”
The groups expressed a variety of feel-ings:inexperience,insecurityanduncertainty, especiallywhenattendingpsychosesandcriti-calsituations,whilealsovaryingasfarasthe satisfactionofbeingabletodealwithmental problems.Otherfeelingswere:fearrelatedto “madness”; fear of scaring the patient away withthediagnosisof“madness”;fearofbeing attackedbypsychoticpatients;anddifficulty inestablishingalinkwiththepatient.
6. Difficulties with the organization of theservices
“Thedifficultywiththesepatientsis thatwedon’tgetreferrals:wedon’tget apsychiatrist.”
“In emergencies, patients arrive in a situationofcrisis.Whenwedon’tgeta referral,weendupsedatingthemfor twoorthreedays.”
The physicians recognized the need for institutional resources such as health services and social assistance for attending toindividualswithmentalproblems.They considered that there were not enough of theseservicesyet,particularlyforattending to psychotic patients, but they foresaw a tendencytowardsimprovement.Theyfound difficultiesinreferringpatientswithmental disorders to the specialized services, and concluded that the disorganization of the healthsystemgeneratesalackofcontinuity andalargedemandforattendance.
DISCUSSION
A fundamental component in the formation of attitudes is the affective dimension.Thecognitiveandbehavioral aspects, i.e. the elaboration of ideas and the actions derived from them, are in-trinsically related to the feelings that go throughthoughtsandconduct.Fromthis complex relationship of cognition-affec-tion-conduct,amoreorlessfertilesoilfor learningwillresult.21Inthepresentstudy,
feartooktheformofuncertainty,insecu-rity,inexperienceandvulnerabilityofthe otherperson.Thisreactionmayoriginate fromthestigmaofmentalillnesses,from which physicians are not immune, and thismaycontributetowardstherejection of“madness”initsvariousmeaningsand theconsequentseparationof“mad”indi-viduals. Consequently, the acquisition of knowledge and formation of attitudes in relationtopatientswithmentalproblems maybesubjecttothefeelingsexperienced by the physician in his work, and to his imagination regarding mental illness, thereby either facilitating or causing dif-ficultytothelearningprocess.
The participants suggested that the mentalhealthtrainingreceivedatmedical schools had led to rather limited results. Eventhoughthedisciplinesofpsychiatry andmedicalpsychologyareincludedinthe curriculum,difficultiesariseinprofessional practicewhenitisnecessarytoidentifyand dealwithmentalproblems,fromtheleast tothemostseverecases.Overthelast50 years,severalstudieshavepointedinthe samedirection:itisnecessarytoimprove medical teaching in relation to mental health problems.The doubt is still what
to do to accomplish this enormous task. The educational requirements for facing the challenges of diagnosing and dealing withmentalproblemsdemandanattentive and critical attitude. This process must startatundergraduatelevelandcontinue throughoutprofessionaldevelopment.For reachingthisgoal,problem-basedlearning andinteractioninsmallgroupshavebeen shown to be superior to the traditional teaching models, which are limited to exposuretoinformation.22
Theseinnovationsinmedicalteaching are student-centered and based on priori-tiesbecause,intheeducationofadults,the learningtriggeristheabilitytoovercome challenges and solve problems. Learning throughproblemsolvingalsoleadsstudents to experience uncertainties, for instance about what and how to study. In health-careattendance,theprofessionalmayface uncertaintywhenchoosingthebestwayto act.Thisconditionofuncertaintymustlead toreflectionandasearchforknowledgeto makedecisions.Thecapacitytobearupto uncertaintiesinthecomprehensionofthe phenomena and the search for solutions, which are very important in relation to mentalhealthclinicalcare,mayconstitute ameaningfulcontributiontowardstheinte-gratedtrainingofthephysician.23-25
The problem-based approach used by generalpractitionershasdemonstrateditsef-fectivenessandacceptabilityinthetreatment ofmentaldisordersinprimarycare.26Inthis
sense,thepossibilityofworkinginprimary carewiththesupportofspecialiststhrough psychiatricconsultationsmayalsobeanim-portanttoolforcontinuingeducation.27
The group discussions raised sev-eralthemesthatwerenotdiscussedinthe training program, considering the general physician’spointofview:psychiatricemer-gencies, mental problems associated with other physical conditions and communi-cation problems in the physician-patient relationship.Otherthemeswerediscussed whilestudyingthecases,butdoubtsabout treatments with psychoactive drugs and psychotherapiesstillremained,aswellasthe difficultiesofknowinghowtoreferpatients tothehealthsystem.
develop the knowledge, skills and attitudes ofthegeneralpractitionerwhenattendingto peoplewithmentaldisorders.28
CONCLUSIONS
Theopinionsofthegeneralpractitio-nersindicatethattheyperceivethemental healthproblemsamongtheirclientele,but as something far from their intervention.
The diagnosis and treatment of mental problemsarestillseenasataskforspecial-ists, since this may demand lengthy time and sophistication. Nevertheless, in their dailyclinicalpractice,theyfacehavingto attend to people with mental disorders, possibly even in a situation of crisis, and theydotheirbesttofindsolutionsamong thevariousdoubtsanddilemmas.
Thechallengeofcontinuingeducation for doctors in relation to mental health requiresmethodsforinteractiveandcritical teaching, such as the problem-based ap-proach. Thus, new educational develop-mentsthatareappropriateforprofessional needsandtherealproblemsofthesedoctors’ communitiesarestillneededforimproving primarymentalhealthcare.
1. Almeida-FilhoN,MariJdeJ,CoutinhoE,etal.Brazilianmul-ticentricstudyofpsychiatricmorbidity.Methodologicalfeatures andprevalenceestimates.BJPsychiatry.1997;171:524-9. 2. BallesterDA,TietzmannA,BusnelloEA.CityofPortoAlegre:
the Brazilian Concept of Quality of Life. In: Goldberg D, Thornicroft G, editors. Mental Health in our Future Cities. London:PsychologyPress;1998.p.173-93.
3. OlfsonM,BroadheadWE,WeissmanMM,etal.Subthreshold psychiatricsymptomsinaprimarycaregrouppractice.Arch GenPsychiatry.1996;53(10):880-6.
4. Andreoli SB, Blay SL, Mari JJ. Escalas de rastreamento de psicopatologia. [Screening scales of psychopathology]. Rev PsiquiatrClin(SãoPaulo).1998;25(5):229-32.
5. KatonW,GonzalesJ.Areviewofrandomizedtrialsofpsychiatric consultation-liaison studies in primary care. Psychosomatics. 1994;35(3):268-78.
6. MashB,Meulenberg-BuskensI.‘Holdingitlightly’:theco-operativeinquirygroup:amethodfordevelopingeducational materials..MedEduc.2001;35(12):1108-14.
7. EssexB.Diagnosticpathwaysinclinicalmedicine:anepide-miologicalapproachtoclinicalproblems.London:Churchill Livingstone;1978.
8. DSM-IV-TR.Manualdiagnósticoeestatísticodetranstornos mentais.4thed.rev.PortoAlegre:Artmed;2002. 9. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Classificação de transtornos
mentaisedecomportamentodaCID-10–descriçõesclínicas ediretrizesdiagnósticas.PortoAlegre:Artmed;1993. 10. DowrickC.Theeducationalchallengeofmentalhealth.Med
Educ.2000;34(7):545-50.
11. PilgrimD,RogersA,ClarkS,ClarkW.Enteringpsychological treatment:decision-makingfactorsforGPsandserviceusers. JournalofInterprofessionalCare.1997;11(3):313-323.
12. Goldberg D.Training general practitioners in mental health skills.IntRevPsychiatry.1998;10(2):102-5.
13. SchnappWB,StoneS,NormanJV,RuizP.Teachingethicsin psychiatry.Aproblem-basedlearningapproach.AcadPsychiatry. 1996;20:144-9.
14. HodgesB,InchC,SilverI.Improvingthepsychiatricknowledge, skills,andattitudesofprimarycarephysicians,1950-2000:a review.AmJPsychiatry.2001;158(10):1579-86. 15. PattonMQ.Qualitativeevaluationandresearchmethods.2nd
ed.NewburyPark:SagePublications;1990.
16. MateusMDL.Estudoetnográficodepacientescomesquizofre-niaeseusfamiliaresemSãoVicente,CaboVerde[thesis].São Paulo:UniversidadeFederaldeSãoPaulo—EscolaPaulistade Medicina;1998.
17. DenzinNK,LincolnYS.Handbookofqualitativeresearch.2nd
ed.ThousandOaks:SagePublications;2000.
18. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Classificação de transtornos mentaisedecomportamentodaCID-10:diretrizesdiagnósticas edetratamentoparatranstornosmentaisemcuidadosprimários. PortoAlegre:ArtesMédicas;1998.
19. BardinL.Análisedeconteúdo.SãoPaulo:MartinsFontes;1979. 20. PopayJ,WilliamsG.Qualitativeresearchandevidence-based
healthcare.JRSocMed.1998;91(Suppl35):32-7. 21. EiserJR.Attitudes,chaosandtheconnectionistmind.Oxford:
Blackwell;1994.
22. OxmanAD,ThomsonMA,DavisDA,HaynesRB.Nomagic bullets:asystematicreviewof102trialsofinterventionstoim-proveprofessionalpractice.CMAJ.1995;153(10):1423-31. 23. FreireP.Educaçãocomopráticadeliberdade.RiodeJaneiro:
PazeTerra;1976
24. VenturelliJ.Educaciónmédica:nuevosenfoques,metasymétodos. Washington:OrganizaciónPanamericanadelaSalud;1997.
25. MamedeS,PenaforteJ,SchmidtH,CapraraA.TomazJB,Sá H. Aprendizagem baseada em problemas: Anatomia de uma novaabordagemeducacional.Fortaleza:HUCITEC;2001. 26. BusnelloEA,LimaB,BertoloteJM.Aspectosinterculturaisde
classificaçãoediagnósticotópicospsiquiátricosepsicossociaisna VilaSãoJosédoMurialdo.[Interculturalaspectsofclassification anddiagnosispsychiatricandpsychosocialtopicsinVilaSao JosedoMurialdo].JBrasPsiquiatr.1983;32(4):207-10. 27.
GoldbergD,GournayK.Thegeneralpractitioner,thepsychia-tristandtheburdenofmentalhealthcare.AvailablefromURL: http://www.iop.kcl.ac.uk/iopweb/departments/home/default. aspx?locator=519.Accessedin2004(Oct14).
28. FeuerwerkerL,KalilME,BaduyRJ.Aconstruçãodemodelos inovadoresdeensino-aprendizagem–asliçõesaprendidaspela RedeUNIDA.DivulgaçãoemSaúdeparaDebate.Available fromURL:http://www.redeunida.org.br/producao/div_licoes. asp.Accessedin2004(Oct14).
Congresspresentation:“Omédicogeneralistaeos problemasdesaúdemental”;authors:DinarteAlexandre Ballester,AnaPaulaFilippon,CarlaBragaandSérgio
BaxterAndreoli,atthe21st
BrazilianCongressofPsychia-try,Goiânia,Brazil,October2003.
Sourcesoffunding:Pan-AmericanHealthOrganization, CoordenaçãodeAperfeiçoamentodePessoaldeNível Superior(CAPES)assistanceagreementno.09-444/2002
Conflictofinterest:Thereisnoconflictofinteresttobe presentedbytheauthors.
Dateoffirstsubmission:March23,2004
Lastreceived:December12,2004
Accepted:December20,2004
AUTHOR INFORMATION
DinarteAlexandreBallester,MD,MSc.Departmentof SocialMedicine,PontifíciaUniversidadeCatólicadoRio GrandedoSul,RioGrandedoSul,Brazil.
AnaPaulaFilippon,MD.Residentphysician,Department ofPsychiatry,UniversidadeFederaldoRioGrandedoSul, RioGrandedoSul,Brazil.
CarlaBraga,MD.Residentphysician,HospitalSãoPedro, StateHealthDepartment,RioGrandedoSul,Brazil.
SérgioBaxterAndreoli,MD,PhD.DepartmentofPsy-chiatry,UniversidadeFederaldeSãoPaulo,Universidade CatólicadeSantos,SãoPaulo,Brazil.
Addressforcorrespondence: DinarteAlexandreBallester
R.PadreChagas,66—conjunto705 PortoAlegre(RS)—Brasil—CEP90570-080 Tel.(+5551)3222-8465
E-mail:[email protected]
Copyright©2005,AssociaçãoPaulistadeMedicina
RESUMO Omédicogeneralistaeosproblemasdesaúdemental:desafioseestratégiasparaaeducaçãomédica CONTEXTOEOBJETIVO:Nocontextodecuidadosprimáriosdesaúdeetranstornosmentais,oobjetivofoi conhecerasopiniõesdemédicosgeneralistassobreoatendimentodepessoascomproblemasmentais. TIPODEESTUDOELOCAL:Estudoqualitativo,porgruposfocais,nosServiçosBásicosdeSaúdeemPorto AlegreeParobé,RioGrandedoSul.
MÉTODOS:Umgrupode41médicosquetrabalhamemcuidadosprimáriosdesaúdefoiescolhidode modointencionalereunidoemgruposfocais.Foramapresentadosaelesdoisvídeos,quesimulavam oatendimentodepacientescomdepressãoepsicose.Discussõessobreaidentificaçãoeomanejodos problemasmentaisforamgravadasedescritaspelométododeanálisedeconteúdo.
RESULTADOS:Asprincipaisopiniõesdosmédicosreferiram-seàsdificuldadesparadiagnosticaretrataros problemasmentais,oenvolvimentodosfamiliaresnocuidadodospacientes,adificuldadedeadesãoao tratamento,asincertezasexperimentadaspelosmédicoseasdificuldadesparareferenciarospacientes aosserviçosespecializados.
CONCLUSÕES:Osmédicosgeneralistaspercebemosproblemasmentaisnasuaclientela,masconsideram queodiagnósticoetratamentodestesproblemasétarefadoespecialista.Odesafiodaeducaçãoconti-nuadaemsaúdementalrequermétodosdeensinointerativosecríticos,comoaabordagemdesolução deproblemas.