EFFECTS OF HEAD PRUNING AND DIFFERENT NUTRITIONAL SYSTEMS (CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL AND INTEGRATED) ON SEED YIELD AND
OIL CONTENT IN MEDICINAL PUMPKIN (CUCURBITA PEPO L.)
Dariush Zarei1, Ghobad Shabani2∗, Mohammad Reza Chaichi3 and Ali Akbarabadi4
1
Department of Medicinal Plants, Kermanshah Branch, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR), Iran
2
Young Researchers and Elite Club, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran 3
College of Agriculture, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, USA 4
Ph.D. Student of Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Lorestan, Iran
Abstract: To evaluate the effect of head pruning and different nutritional systems (chemical, biological and integrated) on yield and seed oil content in medicinal pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.), an experiment was conducted in Kermanshah/Iran during the 2013 growing season. The experimental treatments consisted of two levels – no head pruning, control (Co) and head pruning (C1) allocated to the main plots. Four levels of different fertilizing systems – control (without fertilizer) (T0), chemical (T1), biological (a combination of nitrogen fixing bacteria, Azospirillum brasilense and Glomus mosseae) (T2), and integrated fertilizing system (biological fertilizer + 50% chemical fertilizer) (T3) were assigned to the sub-plots. The experimental treatments were arranged as a split plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The results showed that the highest percentage of seed oil was obtained (37%) in the integrated nutritional system along with the head pruning treatment. The highest grain yields of 53 and 50 g per square meter were obtained in integrated and chemical fertilizing systems, respectively while no pruning was applied. The highest fruit yields of 3,710 and 3,668 kg per hectare were produced by chemical and integrated fertilizing systems, respectively. The biological nutrition system required more time to demonstrate its positive effect on the growth and yield of medicinal pumpkin.
Key words: medicinal pumpkin, nutritional system, pruning of head, seed oil and fruit yield.
Introduction
Medicinal pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) is an annual and one of the most important oil seed plants of cucurbitaceous family. It is native to tropical and subtropical regions (Gong et al., 2012). The highest percentages of protein and oil in pumpkin seed, reflecting the importance and the nutritional value of the product, have been reported in literature (Mohamed et al., 2009).
A low-input sustainable agricultural system can stabilize and maintain the health of environment (Ibrahim et al., 2013). The over-utilization of chemical fertilizers has caused environmental pollution, ecological damage as well as significant increases in crop production costs. Continuous and sustainable production of healthy food along with environmental health issues have been the major concern of farmers, researchers, politicians and policy makers in recent years (Horrigan et al., 2013). Khorramdel et al., (2010) stated that inoculating Nigella sativa seed with Azotobacter, Azospirillium brasilense and mycorrhiza increased the growth and net assimilation rate in the crop. Seed inoculation by mycorrhiza fungi and its positive effect on the growth and yield of some crops like peppermint, tomatoes and corn have been reported by some researchers (Pourhadi, 2012). Numerous researches have been focused on the synergistic impacts of integrated inoculation of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria and Mycorrhiza on the growth and development of a diversity of crops under different environmental conditions (Zarei et al., 2006). Jahan et al. (2011) reported that biological fertilizers increased protein and oil yield on pumpkin. Also, other researches have showed that the integration of biological fertilizers and manure application will result in the highest protein, oil yield and fresh fruit in the plant (Aghaee et al., 2013).
Material and Methods
The experiment was carried out at the Academic Centre for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR), Kermanshah, Iran during the 2013 growing season. The elevation of the site was 1,300 m above the sea level. Soil samples were taken from the top layer of the soil (0 to 30 cm) for the physical and chemical properties (Table 1).
The experimental treatments were arranged as a split plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The experimental treatments consisted of two levels – no head pruning control (Co) and pruning of head (C1) allocated to the main plots. Four levels of different fertilizing systems – control (without fertilizer) (T0), chemical (T1), biological (a combination of nitrogen fixing bacteria of Azospirillum brasilense and Glomus mosseae) (T2) and integrated fertilizing system (biological fertilizer + 50% chemical fertilizer) (T3) were assigned to the sub-plots.
Table 1. Selected physical and chemical characteristics of soil (0–30 cm depth) in the experimental site.
O.C (%)
N (%)
P (ppm)
K
(ppm) Soil texture PH
EC (ds/m)
1.2 0.12 10 490 Loamy silt 7.2 1.3
The plot size was 4 rows of planting (2 m apart) in each experimental plot (8×4 m). Seeds were inoculated in a plastic bag and mixed slowly with a biological fertilizer at room temperature. The amount of the chemical fertilizers (Ammonium phosphate, 16% N, 20% P2O5 at a rate of 500 kg/ha, and urea, 40 kg per 100 litre) in corresponding treatments were calculated based on soil test (Shabani et al., 2012). Phosphorus fertilizer was applied in bands along with each planting line. The seed was sown in late May. Urea application was split and applied in two stages of planting time and blooming stage, on July 15. Seeds were planted by hand at a depth of 5 cm. The first irrigation was applied immediately after planting, while the second irrigation was done three days later. Other irrigation cycle was done weekly (Shabani et al., 2012). The crop was harvested in early September and the measured characteristics included the main stem length, length of lateral branches, and number of lateral branches, 1,000-seed weight, seed yield, fruit yield, and seed oil content. For the purpose of determining the seed oil content, the method by Ghavami and Ramin (2007) was used.
Results and Discussion
There was a highly significant (p<0.01) difference between different levels of pruning on the fruit and seed yields. The effect of different nutritional levels on all measured traits was highly significant (p<0.01). The interaction effect of pruning and fertilizer systems on the 1,000-seed weight (p<0.01) was also highly significant. Our findings were also supported by Jahan et al. (2011) and Aghaee Okhcholar and Hassanzadeh Ghorttapeh (2013) who reported the positive effects of different levels of integrated biological and chemical fertilizers on yield and yield components of pumpkin.
1,000-seed weight
The chemical nutritional treatment (125 g) and integrated fertilizing system (121 g) produced the highest 1,000-seed weight (Table 2). It has been reported that the effect of pumpkin stem pruning significantly increased the yield, which supports the findings of this study (Gholipoori et al., 2007; Omidbeygi et al., 2006; Ebadi et al., 2006 and Kermani Poorbaghaiy et al., 2014).
In addition, some positive effects of integrated fertilizers and stem pruning on 1,000-seed weight of pumpkin have been reported by Shabani et al. (2012). The available nitrogen in chemical and integrated fertilizers plays an important role in metabolic processes and contributes in plant metabolism leading to an increased rate of dry matter accumulation in plant tissues and seeds (Hamzei and Najari, 2012).
Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillium brasilense by increasing nitrogen availability to the plants can play an important role in increasing the 1,000-seed weight. These probiotics also contribute to higher photosynthesis rate in leaves and stems. The chemical and integrated nutritional systems in both pruning and non-pruning treatments significantly increased the 1,000-seed weight compared to other treatments. These results could probably indicate the higher availability of essential nutrients in these fertilizers. There was a synergetic interaction effect of fertilizing and head pruning on the number of lateral stems and levels of photosynthesis, which could explain the higher 1,000-seed weight. The results reported by Shabani et al. (2012) on the effect of nutritional systems and stem pruning on pumpkin are in line with the results of this study.
Fruit yield
produced the highest fruit yields of 3,899.37 and 3,853.87 kg per hectare, respectively (Table 3). The minimum fruit yield of 2,755.3 kg per ha was produced in the control treatment (no fertilizer and no pruning treatment) (Table 3). Increasing the number of fruits due to the increased number of female flowers has been reported by Gholipoori et al. (2007). The formation of the first fruit acts as the physiological destination for photosynthetic assimilates which prevents the formation of the next fruit. Munir et al. (2007), assessing the different nutritional treatments of organic, chemical and integrated fertilizers on sunflower, reported the highest grain yield, oil and protein content in the integrated fertilizer treatment.
Table 2. The main effects of treatments on the traits.
Treatments
Main stem length
(cm)
Mean lateral stem length
(cm)
No. of lateral stems/plant
1,000-seed weight
(g)
Fruit yield (kg/ha)
Grain yield (g/m2)
Seed oil content (%)
T0 cd143.7 b96.4 c4.2 c109.7 c2874.07 c39.33 c18.91
T1 a195.6 a114 a6.5 a125 a3710 a53.23 a33.38
T2 b185.6 b97.1 b5.4 b115.7 b3434.06 b42.69 b21.79
T3 b192.2 a117 b5.8 a121 a3668.6 a50.40 a35.30
C1 291.5a b139.6 a5.6 a118.8 a3589.5 a48.4 a27.14
C0 67.1b a73 a5.3 a116.9 a3254.13 a44.3 a27.55
T0 to T3: Different nutritional systems, C0 and C1: No pruning of head and pruning of head.
Means with the same letter in each column are not significantly different at 5% probability level.
Seed yield
the main stem and the interaction of other corresponding treatments. The results of Aghaee Okhcholar and Hassanzadeh Ghorttapeh (2013) showed that the integrated application of biological and manure fertilizers produced the highest yield of fresh fruit per plant in pumpkin, which supports the results of this experiment. Jahan et al. (2011) also reported the positive and significant effect of different organic fertilizers on fruit and seed yields of pumpkin. The application of bio-fertilizers increased the seed yield of lentil and its components because of the hormonal activities by probiotic bacteria which stimulated the vegetative growth (Zahir et al., 2004).
Seed oil content
The chemical and integrated fertilizer systems across pruning treatments produced 33.38 and 35.30% of oil, so that the ratio of these treatments to biological and control treatments was highly significant (Table 2). The interaction effect of pruning and integrated fertilizing system produced the highest oil concentration of 36.38. The lowest oil content was produced in the control treatment (no fertilizing application) with and without pruning of head (18.22 and 18.94%, respectively) (Table 3). Different nutritional treatments contain different amounts of nutritional ingredients. The availability of nutritional elements in different nutritional treatments causes a significant difference on oil formation and concentration in oil seed plants. That is why the stem pruning of head was not much effective as the nutritional treatments were on oil content of pumpkin seed in this study.
Table 3. Interaction between nutritional systems and pruning of head on the traits.
Treatments
Main stem length
(cm)
Mean lateral stem length
(cm)
No. of lateral stems/plant
1,000-seed weight
(g)
Fruit yield (kg/ha)
Grain yield (g/m2)
Seed oil content (%) T0 C1 63.00c 76.50cd 5.90ab 109.33c 2993.90d 42.02b 18.94cd
T1 C1 78.20c 164.43ab 6.10ab 119.40ab 3899.37a 58.63a 32.96b
T2 C1 66.57c 50.85d 5.90ab 114.30ab 3611.17b 44.67b 21.97c
T3 C1 70.77c 205.23a 6.23ab 124.87a 3853.87a 53.33ab 36.38a
T0 C0 227.77b 92.23cd 4.57bc 110.07c 2755.33e 38.98c 18.22d
T1 C0 316.43a 125.10bc 6.90a 123.97a 3620.70b 50.17b 33.82ab
T2 C0 308.10a 99.47cd 3.77c 117.23ac 3256.97c 40.73bc 21.29cd
T3 C0 313.43a 126.73bc 5.47bc 124.17a 3483.50b 48.80b 35.89ab
T0 to T3: Different nutritional systems, C0 and C1: No pruning of head and pruning of head.
Means with the same letter in each column are not significantly different at 5% probability level.
adjust the physiologic and metabolic activities in plants resulting in better performance and growth (Ram Rao et al., 2007). Our results on pumpkin seed oil in this experiment supported the findings by Aghaee Okhcholar and Hassanzadeh Ghorttapeh (2013). However, Omidbeygi et al. (2006) reported that seed oil content is not affected by pruning of head. But in another study on pumpkin, the effect of stem pruning of head nodes of 10 to 14 was significant on oil and fatty acids (Gholipouri and Nazarnejad, 2007).
The interaction results showed that the highest oil content was seen in the integrated fertilizer system and pruning of head. The same treatment on lateral stems caused a significant increase in photosynthesis level and thereby the number and size of fruits. The 1,000-seed weight and oil content are highly correlated to the fruit yield. Not only may the correlation coefficient depending on the conditions and treatments vary, but also similarly to the present results, Naeemi et al. (2012) reported that a positive and significant relationship between 1,000-seed weight and seed yield of pumpkin was affected by organic fertilizer treatments.
Conclusion
According to the results of this experiment, the integrated fertilizer system and pruning of the medicinal pumpkin plant head could improve the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the fruit and its seed yield. Our results showed that the application of integrated fertilizer to substitute the chemical fertilizers could provide the nutrients needed for pumpkin to achieve its optimum growth. Based on the results of this experiment, it can be stated that using the chemical and integrated fertilizer systems along with the pruning of head played a significant role for the grain yield and oil content in pumpkin. It was shown in this study that combining biological and lower amounts (50%) of chemical fertilizer under favourable conditions will lead to increased pumpkin crop quantity and quality.
References
Aghaee Okhcholar, R., Hassanzadeh Ghorttapeh, A. (2013): Study effect of biofertilizer on yield, yield component, oil and protein content in Cucurbita pepo var. styrica (Text in Persian). Journal of Pajouhesh & Sazandegi. 99:99-111.
Ebadi, A., Gholipoori, A.Gh., Nikkhah-Bahrami, R. (2006): Effect of head pruning of head and between_row spacing on yield and yield components of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo
L.), (Text in Persian) Pajouhesh&Sazandegi Journal 78:41-47.
Ghavami, N., Ramin, A.A. (2007): Salinity and temperatures effects on seed germination of
Silybum marianum L. Gaertn. Commonication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 38:2681-26-91.
Gholipouri, A., Nazarnejad, H. (2007): The effect of stem pruning of head and nitrogen levels on some physio-chemical characteristics of pumpkin seed. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10(20):3726-3729.
Gong, L., Paris, H.S., Nee, M.H., Stift, G., Pachner, M., Vollmann, J., Lelley, T. (2012): Genetic relationships and evolution in Cucurbita pepo (pumpkin, squash, gourd) as revealed by simple sequence repeat polymorphisms. Theory Application Genetic, 124(5):875-891.
Hamzei, J., Najarei, S. (2012): Evaluation of the possibility of reducing nitrogen fertilizer application using nitroxin biofertilizer in the production of anise (Pimpinella anisum
L.) Medicinal Plant, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science (Text in Persian) 23(4):57-70.
Horrigan, L., Lawrence, R.S., Walker, P. (2013): How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives 10(5):445-456.
Ibrahim, M.H., Jaafar, H.Z.E., Karimi, E., Ghasemzadeh, A. (2013): Impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers application on the phytochemical and antioxidant activity of kacip Fatimah (Labisia pumila Benth). Molecules 18(9):10973-88.
Jahan, M., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Salari, M., Ghorbani, R. (2011): The effects of time of manure application and different biological fertilizers on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Cucurbita pepo L. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8(4):726-737.
Jahan, M., Amiri, M., Shabahang, J., Tahami, M. (2013): The effects of simultaneous application of different organic and biological fertilizers on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Cucurbita pepo L. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 11(1):73-87.
Kermani Poorbaghaiy, S.A., M. Pouryousef, Kh. Jamshidi, M.R. Azimi, (2014): Effects of plant density and main stem pruning of head on yield and its components of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepocon var. pepo var. Styriaca). Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic plants (Text in Persian) 30(1):1-9.
Khorramdel, S., Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Ghorbani, R. (2010): Effect of biofertilizers on the yield and yield components of black cumin (Nigella sativa L). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8(5):768-776.
Mohamed, R.A., Ramadan, R.S., Ahmed, L.A. (2009): Effect of substituting pumpkin seed protein isolate for casein on serum liver enzymes, lipid profile and antioxidant enzymes in ccl4-intoxicated rats. Advances in Biological Research 3(1-2):09-15.
Moradi, R., Nasiri Mahallati, M., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Lakzian, A., Nezhadali, A. (2011): The effect of application of organic and biological fertilizers on quantity and quality essential oil of Foeniculum vulgare Mill. (Fennel), Journal of Horticulture Science 25(1):25-33.
Munir, M.A., Malik, M.A., Saleem, M.F. (2007): Impact of integration of crop maturing and nitrogen application on growth, yield and quality of spring planted sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Pakistan Journal of Botany 39(2):441-449.
Naeemi, M., Akbari, Gh. A., Shirani Rad, A.H., Hassanlou, T., Akbari, Gh.A. (2012): Effect of zeolite application and selenium spraying on water relations traits and antioxidant enzymes in medicinal pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) under water deficit stress conditions. Journal of Crops Improvement, (Text in Persian) 14(1):67-81.
Omidbeygi, R., Mafakheri, S., Tavakoli, A. (2006): Study of the effect of pruning of head on some characteristics of medicinal pumpkin. Quartery Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science (Text in Persian) 37(4):10-12.
Ram Rao, D.M., Kodandaramaiah, J., Reddy, M.P. (2007): Effect of VAM fungi and bacterial bio-fertilizers on mulberry leaf quality and silkworn cocoon characters under semi-arid conditions. Caspian Journal Environmental Science 5(2):111-117.
Shabani, G., Ahmadi, M.K., Ahmadi, S., Golzardi, F. (2012): Study of the effects of nutrition systems and pruning of head on yield and oil content of medicinal pumpkin (Cucurbita pepa L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 4(9):547-549.
Zahir, A.Z., Arshad, M., Frankenberger, W.F. (2004): Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Applications and perspectives in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 81:97-168.
Zarei M., Saleh-Rastin, N., Alikhani, H.A., Aliasgharzadeh, N. (2006): Responses of lentil to co-inoculation with phosphate-solubilizing rhizobial strains and arbusclar mycorrhizal fungi. Journal of Plant Nutrition 29:1509-1522.
UTICAJI OREZIVANJA I RAZLIČITIH SISTEMA ĐUBRENJA (HEMIJSKOG, BIOLOŠKOG I INTEGRISANOG) NA PRINOS SEMENA I SADRŽAJ ULJA
KOD ULJANE TIKVE (CUCURBITA PEPO L.)
Dariush Zarei1, Ghobad Shabani2∗, Mohammad Reza Chaichi3 and Ali Akbarabadi4
1
Odsek za lekovito bilje, Ogranak u Kermanšahu,
Akademski centar za obrazovanje, kulturu i istraživanje (ACECR), Iran 2
Mladi istraživači i elitni klub, Ogranak u Malajeru, Islamski slobodni univerzitet, Malajer, Iran 3
Poljoprivredni koledž, Kalifornijski državni politehnički univerzitet, Pomona, SAD 4
Doktorant na Odseku za oplemenjivanje biljaka, Poljoprivredni fakultet, Univerzitet u Lorestanu, Lorestan, Iran.
R e z i m e
Kako bi se procenio uticaj orezivanja i različitih sistema đubrenja (hemijskog, biološkog i integralnog) na prinos i sadržaj ulja u semenu kod uljane tikve (Cucurbita pepo L.), eksperiment je sproveden u Kermanšahu/Iran tokom vegetacione sezone 2013. godine. Eksperimentalni tretmani su se sastojali od dva nivoa – kontrola, bez orezivanja (Co) i orezivanje (C1), na glavnim parcelama. Četiri nivoa različitih sistema đubrenja – kontrola (bez đubriva) (T0), hemijsko (T1), biološko (kombinacija azotofiksirajućih bakterija, Azospirillum brasilense i Glomus mosseae) (T2), i integralni sistem đubrenja (biološko đubrivo + 50% hemijsko đubrivo) (T3) su postavljena na potparcelama. Eksperimentalni tretmani su bili raspoređeni kao podeljena parcela, zasnovana na slučajnom potpunom blok sistemu sa tri ponavljanja. Rezultati su pokazali da je najveći procenat ulja u semenu (37%) dobijen u integralnom sistemu đubrenja zajedno sa tretmanom orezivanja. Najviši prinos zrna od 53 i 50 g po kvadratnom metru je postignut u integralnom odnosno hemijskom sistemu đubrenja, dok orezivanje nije primenjivano. Najveći prinos ploda od 3.710 i 3.668 kg po hektaru je dobijen u varijanti sa hemijskim odnosno inegralnim sistemom đubrenja. Biološki sistem
đubrenja je zahtevao više vremena, kako bi pokazao svoj pozitivan uticaj na rast i prinos uljane tikve.
Ključne reči: uljana tikva, sistem đubrenja, orezivanje, ulje u semenu, prinos ploda.
Primljeno: 14. maja 2015. Odobreno: 12. novembra 2015.
