• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Clinics vol.66 número10

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Clinics vol.66 número10"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texto

(1)

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Further peer review failures

Horacio RiveraI,II

IDivisio´n de Gene´tica, CIBO, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara, Me´xico. IIGene´tica Humana, CUCS, Universidad de Guadalajara,

Guadalajara, Me´xico.

Email: [email protected] Tel.: 52 33 3618-9410

Although peer review has been used to maintain the quality of published research, it can be a ‘‘seriously flawed’’ process1 and might result in the publication of papers with errors. I refer here to the report2 of a de novo (2;16)(q36.3;p13.3)

translocation that is associated with Rubinstein-Taybi syn-drome (RTS). This report was published inClinicsand contains

a cytogenetic mistake in the depicted karyotype. Although the translocation is correct (2;16), the chromosome 2 breakpoint is juxtaposed to the centromere and not at 2q36.3. Thus, the telocentric der (2) is composed of the whole 2q (including the centromere) and is presumably capped with the 16p telomere whereas the whole 2p is attached to 16p13.3. Therefore, the correct karyotype should be written as 46,XX,t(2;16) (p11.2;p13.3)dn. In addition, the assertion by Torres et al.2

that their ‘‘RTS patient is the third reported case with a de novo t(2;16)(q36.3;p13.3)’’ is groundless because only one RTS patient with this translocation has been reported.3 In a

subsequent paper, Torres et al.4 have repeated the same

cytogenetic error. These remarks further stress that even serious mistakes may be unnoticed during the peer and editorial review process.

REFERENCES

1. Newton DP. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors. Account Res. 2010;17:130-45.

2. Torres LC, Lopes Chauffaille ML, Delboni TP, Okay TS, Carneiro-Sampaio M, Sugayama S. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: a female patient with a de novo reciprocal translocation t(2;16)(q36.3; p13.3) and dysgranulopoiesis. Clinics. 2010;65:107-9, doi: 10.1590/S1807-593220 100001000016.

3. Petrij F, Dorsman JC, Dauwerse HG, Giles RH, Peeters T, Hennekam RC, et al. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome caused by a de novo reciprocal translocation t(2;16)(q36.3;p13.3). Am J Med Genet. 2000;92:47-52, doi: 10. 1002/(SICI)1096-8628(20000501)92:1,47::AID-AJMG8.3.0.CO;2-H. 4. Torres LC, Sugayama SM, Arslanian C, Sales MM, Carneiro-Sampaio M.

Evaluation of the immune humoral response of Brazilian patients with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2010;43:1215-24, doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2010007500119.

Copyrightß2011CLINICS– This is an Open Access article distributed under

the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

CLINICS 2011;66(10):1833 DOI:10.1590/S1807-59322011001000025

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The purpose of the present work was to measure the stereotypic content of several professional groups in a Portuguese sample, by determining the culturally shared

Muitos cursos de graduação ainda man- têm uma visão restrita da atuação do fi- sioterapeuta, com ensino voltado para o tratamento de sequelas, o que dificulta o entendimento

Nesta secção será dada uma visão das Áreas de Processo PA de Nível de Maturidade, elucidando sobre o necessário para atingi-lo, este Nível considera as seguintes áreas de

The isokinetic dynamometer has been widely used to assess the muscle strength of elderly in- dividuals both in clinical practice and in research protocols. Although the amount

dos animais Foram feitas medidas de intensidade de campo elétrico dentro da caixa utilizada durante a exposição dos animais ao longo dos quatro tipos de tratamento 1 hora, 3 horas,

Mechanisms to ensure the quality of peer review and agility in the editorial process still pose challenges for many scientific journals, especially in Latin America, due to

More than 90% of peer reviewers surveyed in nursing journals continue to prefer the double blinding process and think it contributes to the quality of manuscripts published.. 5

From the dialogue with the research that has been produced and published in the main international journals within the field of marketing and consumer behavior, it is possible